Spring! Yes! Sort Of! Comment Count

Brian

7078576629_1d5142be3b_z[1]

Eric Upchurch. Upchurch's spring gallery.

The Spring Game came and went and I don't think it was just me: this one seemed flat in comparison to previous editions. The last time Michigan had a spring game so devoid of intrigue it was 2007, when senior versions of Hart and Henne ruled on offense and Lloyd Carr was the coach. Carr often seemed like he'd prefer it if his team played in front of no one, and this tendency was most frequently expressed at spring games. 2007 was boring and that was the way of things: boring.

Since:

  • 2008: closed to the public thanks to Michigan Stadium construction, we still get our first glimpses at the spread offense… and our doom. The sense of the willies you got reading descriptions of what went on (you dismissed it as meaningless spring game stuff because you didn't want to ruin your summer as well as your fall) was the first indicator of what we were in for. The turnover party did not stop until the season did.
  • 2009: Tate Forcier's coming out party. Program savior gets a run out for the first time as an early enrollee, performs brilliantly, everyone high-fives. Ace puts together Weapon of Choice video that is then recut into Weapon of Choice w/ Christopher Walken video. Youtube now thinks this video is set to Avril Lavigne's "Girlfriend," which is Skynet-level commentary on how that Forcier thing worked out.
  • 2010: Denard Robinson's coming out party. Program savior gets a run out for not quite the first time but definitely the first one in which he looks like a plausible quarterback, performs brilliantly, everyone high-fives. Afterwards mgovideo published cutups of all three QBs' snaps so people could engage in Lincoln-Douglass debates about who should be the starter.
  • 2011: Will Al Borges stuff Denard Robinson into a pro-style offense designed for the exact opposite sort of quarterback? Answer: argh, yes. Spring game spawns offseason-long running debate about whether it's pure folly to move away from all shotgun, all the time. Borges participates in internal conflict version of that debate and generally sides with the shotgun crew, except against Iowa, for which we all pay dearly.

The past four years the spring game has been an important data dump that has indicated quite a lot of things about Michigan's season to come. Doom in 2008. Better quarterbacking the next couple years but with a fatal flaw: Forcier and Robinson's blowout performances came against Michigan's defense, which merely blew. Last year displayed to all how bad an idea it was to go under center a majority of the time.

This year Michigan spent about the same number of snaps as last year in the spread, ran Denard out there for one series, gave the established top tailback a few carries, and the whole thing was… just there, flopping around being dull and stuff.

Maybe this opinion is influenced by the fact that I wasn't there, but I don't think so. The things we think we found out are generally less exciting than "introducing DENARD ROBINSON!" and less important than the possibility we might totally screw him up. This is a sign of health in a program. It just makes this post a little less throbbingly important than it has been recently.

Anyway, there were some things we did learn…

Video

DonkeyPuncher231 (please change that username someday, dear DP) has spliced together just about the whole thing:

The official site put out a highlight video about half that length:

Box Scorin'

An unofficial box score from AnnArbor.com. Notables:

  • Gardner two of seven with an INT and 36 yards passing.
  • Bellomy six of nine but the same yardage as Gardner.
  • Gardner 9 rushes for 41 yards.
  • Toussaint five for 39.
  • Rawls 9 for 39.
  • Hayes and Smith had one yard between them on 11 carries.
  • "Unknown" caught two balls for 20 yards. Tacopants?

That data in hand, let's talk turkey.

 

Backup Quarterback Derby? I've Never Heard Of Such A Thing

6932489716_202b893064_z[1]

Upchurch

Michigan's coaches took the Colonel Tressel approach to the obvious #1 storyline of the day, Russell Bellomy looking a lot better than Devin Gardner. Bellomy praise was ladled out but when a reporter asked point-blank who the #2 guy was, Hoke's response:

If you were to name a No. 2 quarterback today, who would it be?

“Well, it’s Devin.”

I see nossing. I do not comment on Devin Gardner throwing multiple five-yard dumpoffs in a manner that John Shurna thinks is unusual and Northwestern's perpetual 6'9" euro center who takes threes despite never making any of them thinks is inaccurate. Neither do I comment on Gardner throwing an interception that, while a pretty good play by one Blake Countess, was also very late.

Borges's Bellomy praise was specifically parceled out after a section of Gardner hype:

You gave most of the snaps to Devin Gardner and Russell Bellomy today …

“Yeah, that’s what we were trying to develop. We decided before we came in that we were only going to play Denard just a little tiny bit. We wanted to see these other kids.”

Thoughts on their springs overall?

“Yeah I think Devin in particular has had an outstanding spring. He’s really done some very nice things and has developed in the position more and more. Needs more time in situations like this where there’s a lot of people watching and the pressure’s on and all that, but he has really done a nice job. And Russ -- I said it last week and the week before -- Russ has been steady and solid and [when] guys get open he hits them. He makes very few mistakes. He’s just one of those kinds of guys. He too is very athletic and can get himself out of some messes. He’s a solid guy.

If Gardner's been really good and Bellomy uninspiring but solid and mistake-light throughout the spring, only one of these traits came through on Saturday.

Twitter took the evidence on hand, considered it carefully, and wrote out a PhD thesis about how Gardner was terrible forever and Bellomy should be the backup quarterback as Gardner became LarryJustin FitzeraldBlackmon. And, yea, because twitter always has the most considered opinions these were not immediately regretted in the morning and… actually, hold that twitter sarcasm for one twitter moment.

Do we of the twitter hivemind regret that? Let's consider the evidence. Last year Gardner got into various games and threw 23 passes. He was 11 of 23 for 176 yards (7.6 YPA), one touchdown, and one INT. There was also this:

The defense would like to add this:

That's not much to go on. Let's make our data big, at least insofar as it can be made so.

In three consecutive spring games he's looked bad. You may remember Jake Ryan bursting onto the scene last year with a pick six thrown directly at his dome by Gardner. Yeah. Stuff on Gardner from the last spring game post:

As per usual, many events from the spring game are in the eye of the beholder. Is Devin Gardner's inability to find anyone open an indictment of him, an indictment of the second-team wide receivers, or… uh… like… people being covered? I know that latter seems improbable but I have seen football games in which this has happened. …

Unfortunately, there was a lot that was unambiguously bad, most of it from the quarterbacks: interceptions whistled yards over the intended receiver's head or thrown directly at linebackers, a Mallett-like plague of dropped snaps, offsides calls, etc. The general impression was more 2008 than 2010. … The QBs sucked on their own. …

Devin Gardner was also inaccurate in drills. They have this dig route where a slot receiver works to the seam then cuts his route off 15 yards downfield and Gardner was consistently missing it.

Robinson went out and did okay for himself after that business, minimizing its importance in our attempts to judge him. For Gardner it remains a big chunk of the time we've gotten to see him.

Here's the video of the year previous:

A summary of that from the immediate aftermath:

Devin Gardner looked raw as hell, fumbling snaps, scrambling into trouble, and reverting to that ugly shotput motion whenever he was forced to throw on the run. He looked like a freshman, which is okay because he is a freshman. However, the torrent of spring hype that suggested Gardner would probably not redshirt because he would be Michigan's best quarterback by UConn… eh, not so much. Maybe it was just a bad day. Even if it was an off day, Robinson showed enough to relegate Gardner to the bench for the first couple games and hopefully his whole freshman year.

Gardner did show the his deep touch on a third and long seam to Odoms that was laid in perfectly. Odoms dropped it.

Gardner got safetied and intercepted on the same play and still probably had a better overall outing than he did yesterday.

So. This is our oeuvre. Now consider Michigan's situation:

  • They didn't even attempt a long pass yesterday, presumably because they were all covered. After tight end, wide receiver is the position on offense that could most use an instant talent infusion.
  • Most of the unambiguously  good things Gardner did yesterday involved his legs. That scamper down the sideline… good lord y'all. It's not a big stretch to declare him the best athlete on the team outside of Denard, and given that size and wingspan he could be pushing close to #16.
  • Bellomy looks like a competent game manager should the need arise.
  • Given Robinson's previous two seasons at QB, the need almost certainly will arise.
  • Moving Gardner away from quarterback gives Michigan exactly two QBs this year and next and means either a true freshman or low-profile redshirt sophomore starts for M in 2013.

What do you do with that? Hell if I know. If you still had Forcier around and recruited a 2012 quarterback I would be at the post office right now watching Hoke mail a bow-clad Gardner* to Jeff Hecklinski. If there were enough of us and a fiddle we'd probably be singing Hava Nagila and dancing.

*[He's also wearing a full uniform, pervs.]

In Michigan's current situation, moving Gardner is asking for this interlude in game nine:

Matt-Millen-Will-McDonough-580[1]

MCDONAUGH: Michigan's quarterback is now Jack Kennedy. Ask not what your team can do for you, Jack, amirite? 
MILLEN: He looks really, really sweaty.
MCDONAUGH: Astute observation, Matt. Jack Kennedy is soaked in a bodily fluid we dearly hope is sweat.
MILLEN: Someone should get him an IV. I… what is that? That can't be healthy.
MCDONAUGH: Jack Kennedy is leaving a trail of viscous material behind him that must be a slurry of sweat and pure, distilled fear. Here's the snap. Kennedy hands off from the I-form… Vincent Smith with a one-yard loss.
MILLEN: Can all that fluid really be coming out of his body?
MCDONAUGH: Take it from my uncle Morty: all that and more. Vincent Smith with a one-yard loss.
MILLEN: How can he even hold on to the ball?
MCDONAUGH: I have no idea. This series of one-yard losses may be the most heroic in football history. Vincent Smith tackled for a loss of one.
MILLEN: Just look at him not fumble that snap despite having lost half his body weight in the past six minutes.

dal_ok_ksu_booth_20111029[1]

MCDONAUGH: It's kind of beautiful.
MILLEN: For spacious skies. For aglumb waves of grain. For purple mounted mohair above the fruit-tossed Spain. AMERICAAAAAAA—
MCDONAUGH: Hagerup in to punt.
MILLEN: –AMERICAAAAAAAA, GOD SPED HIS FACE ON THEEEEEE. AND CROWN THY HOOD WITH BROTHERGOOD FROM PEA TO SHINGLING PEA.
MCDONAUGH: Inspiring stuff from Ann Arbor. Michigan has six yards of offense at the half. We'll be back after this commercial break.

SCENE. This may have been drug-induced.

Anyway. They'd probably just put Gardner in and hope they hadn't stunted his development to the point where he'd be totally useless. Things would go poorly.

Could you blame them that much, though? If Hoke reaches for the brass ring next fall and it blows up in his face because Denard goes down and the guy who was supposed to be his backup is at wideout, I probably wouldn't even be mad. It would suck, but I want a guy who will swing for the fences.

While the coaches are going out of their way to make it sound like that is not in the cards, sometimes the relationship between reality and what coaches have to say to not have horrible things happen is great. If Devin wants to be the #2 QB going into fall Michigan would be foolish not to downplay the WR stuff until he's on campus in the fall. Once he's there, then talk to him about moonlighting while still being the #2.

Gun to the head, I think he does see a lot of time at WR in fall camp. He'll still practice most of the #2 QB snaps but also taking a share of snaps at WR when Denard is out there. They'll teach him one of the four spots—probably Hemingway's—and use him in certain three and four wide receiver packages for 15-20 snaps a game. If he proves to be a top-flight guy quickly Michigan might not have much choice about using him more in tight games, but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

If Denard goes down for any length of time, it'll be Devin.

Meanwhile there are 20 or 21 other positions Michigan has to fill…

All Eyes(z) On Campbell

"It just means I can't slip at all, because I got 120 eyes on me now," Campbell said of leading the team on the field.

Well… there's no denying he looked a lot better.

041412_SPT_Spring_Game_MRM_02_fullsize-thumb-590x391-108936[1]

Not literally. His name is Rio and he dances on the sand. Via AnnArbor.com

Like, a lot. Last spring game guy was a lump who managed to not get blown off the ball most of the time and just about never did anything. During the year he was largely that with some nice plays mixed in, but too infrequently to be encouraging. In the spring game he had clearly progressed enough to actually beat his man to the gap more than once.

You know all those runs Rawls had where he had to abort mission and find another hole? Most of those were headed at Campbell. Since we got a baseline for Ricky Barnum in the time he got before his ankle injury last year—decent Big Ten player even then—that's a hopeful sign.

Mattison and Hoke hated it, though, hated everything. I am factoring in further improvement as this line Heningers themselves into ship shape by fall. Enough to survive a 'Bama onslaught? Probably not, but they'll be okay afterwards.

Other DL Items

Roh and Black each showed some pass-rush ability from their spots and neither got ostentatiously rammed into the endzone on a big run play. The going was tough for the offense. With four-ish starters back from an OL that paved the way for Michigan running backs—IE, no Denard—to average 5.7 YPA last year, I'll place that in the good column. The extremely tenuous good column.

One nice thing the moves do is it allows Mattison to play a ton of games with his line. Black and Roh can both function as outside DEs just fine, so Mattison can call plays where the line slants and stunts such that one of those guys ends up playing a WDE-ish slot whenever he wants. What Michigan lacks in bulk they'll have to make up for with quickness and the element of surprise; Mattison will have some chess pieces to do that with next year. Note that the touch sack on the Gardner waggle came from the containing… Black. Usually your three-technique is not the guy asked to do that.

The depth here was also encouraging. Richard Ash made a couple nice plays, which I was not expecting. One was an excellent string-out on a stretch play that forced the tailback to awkwardly cut behind him. I was beyond not expecting that. I don't think John Gasaway will get on me if I say I was shocked. Yeah. Later he showed up two yards in the backfield directly in the path of an iso; he got blocked from the side but the bounce he forced saw Marvin Robinson chop poor Vincent Smith down for a one-yard loss.

Redshirt freshman Keith Heitzman also was a standout on the second units, though his inability to flow down the line at the proper angle was the main issue on Rawls's fourth-and-short touchdown. He got into the backfield plenty. Once you've got a guy who can get there it's not that hard to get him to take the right angle against air.

Injuries

306217_386741454694083_145265025508395_1221994_717048127_n[1]

Toussaint clubberates Morgan, via the Wolverine

None serious. Desmond Morgan took a cut block from Fitzgerald Toussaint and limped his way to the sidelines for the day; a source indicates that is not serious and shouldn't affect him at all. Jerald Robinson also had a minor boo boo that should not affect him.

The only player to miss the game was backup SDE Nate Brink, and that injury was no surprise since it happened before the Sugar Bowl. Barring a non-contact injury, Michigan should hit fall camp with everyone on the roster ready to go. Everyone save Brink, the suspended Josh Furman, and the mysteriously absent-but-returned now Tamani Carter got a full spring session in.

So they've got that going for them. That's a lot better than last year when five or six important players, including Toussaint and Lewan, were sidelined.

The Burzynski Start

World, meet Joey Burzynski, the redshirt sophomore walk-on who started at left guard in the spring game. That's not a huge surprise since a lot of shadowy spring practice reports praised him as a potential contributor and he had seen some time with the ones in the King of Tight Frames' highlight videos throughout the spring. His start may not mean anything more than Michigan wanted a decent right tackle (Elliott Mealer) on the second unit to give Bellomy a little time, but the guy started the spring game and must be considered an obvious member of the two-deep.

This is a development that strikes me as concerning. Redshirt freshman Chris Bryant has been getting a lot of shadow praise for a year now and he doesn't seem to be anywhere close to finding a starting job. Not only is he behind Mealer on most days when Mealer is a guard, he's behind Burzynski. Decrement your Bryant excitement meters.

No offense to Burzynski, but until proven otherwise the assumption here is that the spot featuring a walk-on is going to be a problem. Even if it's not that's a spot that will be subject to fierce competition in fall.

Q: does Michigan have enough faith in one of its incoming freshman tackles to move Kalis from primary tackle backup—this site's assumed role for him as a freshman—to left guard competitor? A: Dunno. I do know they like Ben Braden a lot, like far more than the recruiting sites did. Whether he's got the polish to be that third tackle or not I don't know. I would look at insta-move of Kalis inside as a good sign as far as Magnuson and Braden go. That'll be something to watch for in the spring.

Thomas Rawls: Ramming Speed

We got a few carries from Toussaint to remind us that yes, Virginia, Michigan has a true feature back again. The headliner amongst the backups was sophomore Thomas Rawls, who showed a knack in short-yardage ramming and the sort of spread-oriented north-south RAGE runs that Brandon Minor used to specialize in.

It was the short yardage that was most impressive. Michigan's OL was rarely getting Rawls the holes they intended to get him. I'll leave the debate about whether that was Mattison's DL being better than expected or the OL worse for people who enjoy debating impossibilities; what was certainly impressive is that when that happened to Rawls he downshifted behind wherever the intended hole was supposed to be and burst into the next one over—closer to the middle of the field. He lowered his head, knocked guys back, and showed enough presence of mind to reach the ball across the goal line when he was suspended near it. Your short-yardage back: check.

Rawls also displayed that north-south bowling ball mentality on a couple of belly plays from the gun on which flailing arm tackles failed to bring him down and he fell forward after contact. He's got enough of a package to also provide breathers for Toussaint when he wants out. He'll get 5-10 carries a game this year and fill a role. Not sure if he'll ever reach feature back status with two more years of Toussaint and the Isaac(?)/Smith cavalry coming in next season, but he doesn't have to to be a good idea.

Vincent Smith: Did I Do Something Wrong?

Dear Tiny Jesus,

It's me, Vincent. All praise to your save percentage. Could you make sure the spring game is the last time I ever run an iso play from under center? I never go anywhere and it hurts a lot when six 300 pound defensive tackles fling me into the natatorium.

Congratulations on your call-up with the Blue Jackets.

Tiny Bros Before Other Bros,
Vincent

(Smith will be the third down back again and will level some dudes way bigger than he is to open up third down conversions. The power of Rawls hopefully compels Michigan not to run Smith out of the I any more.)

Disappointingly Absent

Spring game disclaimers apply, but where were Jerald Robinson and Roy Roundtree? They were out there. They were not targeted frequently. IIRC Roundtree got a hitch from Robinson on the first drive and then was not gone to again. Robinson featured from time to time but never as a downfield receiver, always as a checkdown option and usually a checkdown option being given a crappy pass.

The only receiver to make an impact was Gallon. I'd prefer Michigan's main target to be a big dude with a bigger catching radius, no offense Denard.

Secondary Status Quo

7078554489_4ed0609cd4_z[1]6932478862_a97ebdb253_z[1]

Upchurch

After a series of video clips heavily featuring comer Terrence Talbott with the ones instead of JT Floyd it was Floyd who got the start Saturday. He played well, making quick tackles on the short stuff. Later he broke up a slant on a goal-line situation only to get a horsecrap PI call (BOOO PRETEND REF, BOOO). While Talbott got some run, I don't think Floyd's job is under serious threat. Especially after Mattison gushed about him at that Glazier clinic some months ago.

As a unit the secondary was excellent. Countess got a pick and there were very few downfield completions. A skinny post from Gardner to Gallon stands out as the only one of note. Default note about how that makes the WRs look bad goes here; comparison to Michigan defenses pre-Mattison also does. To virtually skunk an offense in 60 plays is quality. With Talbott emerging Michigan seems to go four-deep at corner, maybe five or six depending on how ready Hollowell and Taylor are. The comparison to the Never Forget days is wondrous.

If the depth isn't quite as good at safety at least Jarrod Wilson and Marvin Robinson seemed on top of things… most of the time. Wilson was the guy Rawls made most of his highlights against. If either starter goes down there will be some hairy moments. One of the two should be able to replace 80% of Kovacs next year.

Robinson is out of the doghouse and to see him play well was good because I'd gotten some practice buzz that indicated he was out of shape. He's obviously not; he seems tuned in. Michigan will need him. Even if Furman's stuff was as minor as his lawyer suggests he'll be behind this fall. If it's not as minor he might not be available for a while.

Do Not Be Alarmed, Rich Rodriguez Is Still In Arizona

Formations and such: Michigan still can't run out of the I worth a lick, which is fine by me. I suppose we have to downshift into that stuff eventually, but I'd rather it be clear as day that the way to go is shotgun just to prevent any further Iowa-like misunderstandings of where Michigan's capabilities lie.

Aside from that the most interesting aspect of the day's formations was the most common set: two backs, three WRs, shotgun. That was the meat and bones of the spread and shred in its Slaton/White/Schmitt heyday and Michigan has a pretty good replica of that in Toussaint/Robinson/Hopkins, albeit without the spread-oriented OC and the lethality of the spread in the early aughts as allies.

This says what everyone expects about the TEs—yuck—and suggests that if Michigan can't block 'em they're going to spread 'em. If it's going to work they are going to have to make that gray area defender pay for cheating. We'll see.

Brandin Hawthorne: Mauler of Walk-ons

The most interesting thing that happened after Jack Kennedy entered, signaling the end of serious attention from most folk, was Brandin Hawthorne going ham. He shot a gap for a backfield TFL reminiscent of his slice into the Irish backfield late in that game, then intercepted a TE-bound ball on the next play.

He made a few other tackles here and there and looked… really good.

Now, we've seen him on the field and there's only one way Hawthorne making contact with a Big Ten blocker ends. That would be "poorly," and that would be why Desmond Morgan took his job last year and won't give it back this year.

I'm just saying, though. Just sayin' that when Michigan goes to a nickel package on a passing down I think having Hawthorne in there as a blitzer and cover guy instead of Morgan would behoove Michigan. Morgan's a little ponderous on his pass drops, and if it's a passing down Hawthorne's limitations against rushes aren't relevant. Just sayin'. Throwin' it out there.

You, athletic department intern who has to read these things: don't say you got it from me. Ask Mattison to repeat that thing he was saying a couple months ago about using Hawthorne as a nickel WLB and how smart that seemed even before he was killing walk-ons in the spring game. Yeah.

Miscellaneous

Game bits:

  • Bellomy ran a QB power from the gun, so it's still there and it might stick around for a while. Bellomy did decently with it.
  • There were also a few inverted veers, none of which went for a ton of yards. Gardner did impressively juke himself into a crease outside on one; he was blown dead before he could test it.
  • Kaleb Ringer had an impressive track-and-tackle on Hayes in the open field off a dumpoff. Next play he whiffed a tackle on Toussaint (I think it was him).
  • Jeremy Jackson's lack of separation from Blake Countess was… not surprising.
  • Demens blanketed a Brandon Moore TE out that Gardner shouldn't have thrown but did; he made a nice play on the ball. His coverage is an underrated aspect of his game.
  • Antonio Poole only popped up on my radar when he lost leverage on a Gardner scramble late.

Weather could have been worse. This is what Indiana was facing down for their now-cancelled spring game:

image

Tre Roberson put the One Ring into the fires of Mount Press Box and things returned to normal.

Random picture on the twitter:

Aqi7cKpCAAEA7jG[1]

Tuley-Tillman, Bosch… OH GOD WHAT DID THEY DO TO DENARD BREATHE BREATHEEEE

LaQuon Treadwell with Morris and Bosch:

ekavt[1]

Elsewhere

Photos from Maize and Blue Nation, AnnArbor.com, AnnArbor.com again (alumni game), and MVictors. Rod Payne came dressed as Raiden:

041412_SPT_Alumni_Game_MRM_02_fullsize[1]

Melanie Maxwell/AnnArbor.com

Alumni game recap at AA.com.

Bullets and whatnot from:

Also AA.com has an article on Burzynski.

Comments

WolverineHistorian

April 16th, 2012 at 2:33 PM ^

All I remember about last year's Spring game was Denard looking horrible and many people here going into panic mode because of it. 

And as someone who went to every spring game from 1998 to 2007, I can say almost all of them were devoid of intrigue and seemed flat.  Rarely was there even a game with Lloyd.  It was more of several different scrimmages going on around the field at the same time so you always seemed to miss something.  They never turned the old scoreboards on in the stadium and instead had a portable one on the field.  8 times out of 10, the weather was dark, cloudy, high chance of rain, usually cold.  Most of the star players were almost always injured so they never even suited up.  Around 2004ish, the fans were no longer allowed to go on the field afterwards to get autographs of the players.  I actually got a little bored after a while.  And that's saying something coming from me.

Very rarely did the outcome of the spring game predict much of what would happen once football season rolled around for me.  I remember Carlos Brown looking like Tryone Wheatley in spring and Navarre looking like Tom Brady.  At the 2000 spring game, Hayden Epstein kicked a 60 yard field goal but was later known for many wide rights during the season.  You get a somewhat accurate preview for a few players but nothing dramatic. 

readyourguard

April 16th, 2012 at 2:48 PM ^

The fumbled snap seemed to be Denard's fault.  He stepped away before getting the ball.  It was a good snap by Barnum.

Demens is doing a nice job of reading and filling.  He had a nice collision with a blocking Hopkins.

I thought the line came off the ball pretty well.  They were making good contact.  Conversely, our DL had good movement too, but I'm very concerned about the cut-backs against us.

Nobody will take away any useful information about this scrimmage.  It was intentionally bland.  I'm certain the coaches just want to find out who can play and who's capable of being a quality backup.  Honestly, the work begins NOW for the Alabama game.  We have to get stronger and watch a shit-ton of film.

 

Hardware Sushi

April 16th, 2012 at 3:03 PM ^

So much good stuff in this post.

  • Gotta start off with calling Rod Payne Raiden. I was realy hoping he wouldn't put his arms up post-Fatality move and call lightening down from the skies, thus cancelling the game.
  • I thought, while Hawthorne made a good play, Jack Kennedy's INT was a case of one-too-many hops after his drop. It was that last bunny hop that ruined his timing. I know I'm not making bold statements here; the BTN guys did a good job on that one.
  • Devin didn't do himself any favors with the way he threw it, but I'm less concerned with that than the fact the he didn't have anyone open. I know Brian broke down last Spring's opinions of Devin to similar results and maybe I'm being stubborn - I still choose to believe he's dealing with not being the number 1 QB getting reps with the number 1 guys. I choose to believe familiarity and rhythm are huge immeasurable factors in QB play. Maybe that ignorance is my bliss.
  • WOOO DENARD FITZ 2012! There have to be some good election year bumper stickers that can make there way into the MGoStore, right? If we kickstart an MGoScholarship and give away 'free' bumper stickers, do we still get a cease and desist letter from the University?

One Inch Woody…

April 16th, 2012 at 3:08 PM ^

Please Brian, write every post high on Vicodin. This was simply hilarious. I held it in until the Millen/Mcdonough troupe commentary on Kennedy and you made me laugh in my ultra-quiet, yet busy research lab and I received quite a few glares of death.

dahblue

April 16th, 2012 at 3:42 PM ^

Really?  Did you really say this:

...the obvious #1 storyline of the day, Russell Bellomy looking a lot better than Devin Gardner. 

That was the "obvious #1 storyline"?  Not Rawls showing well?  Not Will looking svelte?  That's only the case for a grade-A, Silky Johnson-esque hater who's hell bent on the Devin Gardner to WR thing...even though similar comments about Denard (who never threw an interception in a spring game (or 15 in regular games) would be blasphemy.  No one is making that the #1 story but MgoBlog.

Dude, it was a practice; Devin's got a great arm and great future at Michigan.  Be happy about that and appreciate that his errors came in a practice.  He's got plenty of time to work it all out.

Silky.  Keep it real, my man.

BiSB

April 16th, 2012 at 4:18 PM ^

He didn't say that Devin was terrible and should be resigned to special teams gunner duty. He said Bellomy had a better day... which was (IMO) true. And in the absence of any real breaking news, when the 3rd string QB outperforms the presumed 2nd string QB, that becomes your headline.

Sure, Rawls looked good. So did Big Will.  So did lots of guys. But the best news of the day doesn't necessarily mean the biggest news of the day.

dahblue

April 16th, 2012 at 7:04 PM ^

It's debatable whether Bellomy had a better day.  To me, he looked like Tate-lite, but I was very happy with him as a 3rd string option.  Very happy.  However, the reports (other than Brian's) about the Spring Game were not about Devin.  They were about Rawls, Will, Countess, "the defense".  There's nothing "obvious" about a story when no one is reporting other than the guy calling it "obvious".

wolverine1987

April 16th, 2012 at 4:36 PM ^

working there. Um, to each his own opinion of what the #1 storyline of the spring game was, but I can tell you that WAY more people in my circle discussed Devin than the fact that Rawls looked good, or Will's tummy. And you do know that QB almost always gets more pub in every article about football everywhere right? 

Oh, and to address your point about it being verbotten here to discuss moving Denard to WR but it's ok somehow (to Brian) to discuss it for Devin. There is a reason for that: Denard has proven, even before he played a game last season, that he was, by leaps and bounds, the best QB on our team. That is an objective fact. To move him because someone assumed that Devin would be a better QB and then we'd get both on the field is both a completely different situation than we are in now, and also (now) kinda dumb. Brian is talking about moving the clear, undisputed #2 QB to a position of great need. Totally different situation.

WolvinLA2

April 16th, 2012 at 6:53 PM ^

Different schools do it differently.  Also, some schools do it differently from year to year.  It's possible that in future years when our numbers are higher (such as a small previous senior class, many early enrollees or many capable walk-ons) that we play a full game.  As it stood this year, we were almost 30 scholarship guys short, between the 22 coming in the fall, the scholarships we have open, and Furman-like situations. 

bronxblue

April 16th, 2012 at 4:38 PM ^

So with the Spring Game over, I can now return to my UM fan fiction about Smith and Gallon joined forces to battle the forces of evil as superhero mountain goats!

echoWhiskey

April 16th, 2012 at 5:35 PM ^

Don't take this as advocating for Devin, but on that 4th and 22 against State, he was trying to make a play.  I mean, it's 4th and 22.  It was never going to work, but he was giving it a go.  On the flipside, on the good Illinois play, he still looks like he is guiding the ball rather than throwing it... and I haven't seen evidence that he's corrected that yet.

baldurblue

April 16th, 2012 at 5:46 PM ^

I went to the spring game with my brother and got there late, as we walked up the steps on the east side of the stadium, Tim Hardaway Jr. was signing a couple autographs.  He walked the steps next to us.  We were sitting up in the box section so we had tickets, and as we pulled them out, THJ looked and me and said, "do we need tickets for this?" 

I looked dumb and mumbled something like, "we have them but you don't need them."  It was awesome.

burger22

April 16th, 2012 at 6:39 PM ^

I attended the spring games in 1993, 2004, 2010 and watched the game on tv this year.  This was the most positive I've felt afterwards, although my expectations have been lowered.  1993 was so exciting that I didn't attend again until 2004.  The highlights of 1993 was Steve Everitt and 2 other graduated linemen standing on the top bleachers in the north end zone with their shirts off yelling at the players and coaches on the field.  1993 was a disappointing season, though.

The highlight on 2004 was Braylon Edwards going deep on Marlon Jackson and Gutierez overthrowing the play by 10 yards,

I thought Gardner was more impressive than most people thought and I wouldn't say Bellamy outperformed him because the 1st team D was far superior to the 2nd team.  My description would be that Rawls looked like an all american v. the 2s and a servicable back v. the 1s.  Gardner obviously started shaky, but I thought he improved as the scrimmage went and by the end he still looks to me like he can be very good for 2 years.

I thought the D potentially could be very good, I think they should be better than last year.  Countess looks like he's continuing to develop into our next NFL corner.  Our linebackers look good to me and our 2nd string linebackers could start for some Big 10 schools.  Jibreel Black still needs to learn the position but I think can be really good, and if we can find enough depth at DLine, I think this group has the potential to be pretty good.

Offensively, I'm concerned about left guard, but our line overall looked pretty good, especially Lewan and Schoeffield.  Gallon looks good, Jerald Robinson looks servicable.  I thought Fitz looked awesome.  He looks stronger, faster and more explosive to me.  but overall I think the offensive looks miles ahead of last year.  Even though we didn't show much, it looked to have an identity  of mostly spread with a staple of plays under center, whereas last year the O definitely lacked idenity.

If the players work hard all summer, Team 133 could really have a special season.  Let's hope...

"Those Who Stay Will Be Champions!"

 

WolvinLA2

April 16th, 2012 at 6:54 PM ^

For all the talk about Jibreel Black being undersized - he doesn't look it to me.  He doesn't look like BWC, but he looks big enough to play 70% of the snaps at the 3-tech.

M-Wolverine

April 16th, 2012 at 9:09 PM ^

Sorry Jack, but that was pretty damn funny.

Don't know for a fact one way or another, but it is possible they were praising Devin because he was the better QB for most of the Spring, and they knew people would be freaking out over one practice of the whole session.  

Have you heard the skuttlebutt on Braden from someone who knows the coaches? Because we have a good tradition of taking the best linemen in the State that the services don't love quite as much and turning them into beasts.

I'll be more worried about the receivers when I see Denard isn't connecting with them, rather than back-ups.  And all the Talbott hype might not have been to worry JT Floyd (you're right, he may be entrenched), but was serving notice to Countess. Not that the kid is doing anything wrong, but Mattison has made it clear he's making sure freshmen who have had early success aren't going to get big heads and live off their past, but instead strive to be great. No one thought it might be Blake that TT could be pushing, because, well, duh, but it might just be keeping him honest. And as you said, depth.

 

He's got enough of a package to also provide breathers for Toussaint when he wants out.

DonAZ

April 16th, 2012 at 9:43 PM ^

2008 - "The turnover party did not stop until the season did."

I don't mean this as flamebait ... I'm simply reporting what I saw at the UofA spring game last Saturday -- pretty much the same thing.  Ball control was an issue.

Third Down Guy

April 16th, 2012 at 10:13 PM ^

She's my 5-year old daughter!  I took that picture.  Kyle & Logan were super nice guys!  They're bigger in person.  When we were walking away she asked me "Dad, were those guys giants?"  Haha!  She's a huge Michigan fan!!  She can name every player (well alright...not EVERY - but most), their number and position, as well as, the coaches and coordinators.  I took her to her first game last year and I didn't know how long she'd last....so we walked around at halftime.  Five minutes into halfway she asked "Dad, can we go back in now?"  I sing "Hail to the Victors" to her every night.  She wants so badly to meet Denard!!!

SFBayAreaBlue

April 16th, 2012 at 10:20 PM ^

hem-haw,....  oh boy.  Where to start?  BWC might be looking more svelt, but he did not give an inspiring performance.  It's not just his pad level, his first 2 steps are terrible and his motor and pursuit are questionable.  He only really got off the ball well on about 4 snaps.  Most of the time he was popping right up and not getting any forward momentum.  This is the first time I'v watched extensive video of him, and after watching 3+ years of Mike Martin, there was a lot left to be desired.  

It wsn't all bad, he does one thing really well.  He can submarine on short yardarge plays.  But when he's on his feet he gets moved away from the point of attack too easily.  I don't think he can be an everydown guy for us.  I'd put him in a four point stance and have him shoot gaps, but you can't do that on every play.  

The other problem is that without him we're going to be very undersized.  We've all seen what Roh and Black can do, they are fairly athletic, but when we go up against a beefeater team, you can see that they might get worn down by the constant pounding and slow death of say a wisconsinesque rushing attack.  

Hawthorne looked good, but I've been high on him since last year.  I still think something else contributed to his lack of playing time given that his major weakness, engaging blockers, was also Morgan's major weakness, but that could just be tinfoil hat thinking.  

If anyone has access to BWC, get him in a four point stance and teach him to bear rush every day. EVERY DAY.  You know how they make running backs carry a ball with them everywhere when they have fumble problems, BWC should have to push around a sled that is about 3 feet tall everywhere he goes.  He really needs to work on his forward acceleration coming out of his stance. 

I haven't seen extensive video of Pipkins yet, so I can't comment on that, but I expect we'll be rotating a lot of bodies on the d-line next fall. To keep them fresh because of the size issues and because of limited situational skill sets.  

Decatur Jack

April 16th, 2012 at 10:55 PM ^

1. Who scored the two touchdowns? RAOWZ!

2. WOOO RUSSELL BELLOMY! Always liked that guy. (Although my friends want to know how a three-star Texas QB can possibly be better than a five-star Michigan QB. I said "because his highlight video played 'Black and Yellow' instrumental.")

3. Jack Kennedy lol. That guy sucks.

funkywolve

April 17th, 2012 at 1:00 AM ^

I've seen a few comments about the lack of separation the wr's got and really, that was the case in 2011 too.  Most of the big plays in the passing game last year came because either the defense had a breakdown or the UM wr was covered pretty well but made a great read on the ball.  It wasn't like the UM wr's last year were blowing by people or spinning the db's around on double moves. 

To a certain extent i think that will be the case again this year.  With Denard and the wr's having another year under their belt with this offense maybe there will be some new wrinkles that get guys open, but none of the wr's UM has have shown the blazing speed or pinpoint route running that will create space in the passing game.

TyrannousLex

April 17th, 2012 at 11:00 AM ^

this manufactured backup QB controversy. It would be splendid if there was good depth on both lines and QBs on the roster had been taught some level of passing mechanics. That's not what Hoke has, and it will be a few years until he does.

Bellomy didn't look that much better than Gardner; people are just using a different set of expectations to measure them. (I like Bellomy expect him to play well at some point.)

Gardner needs to calm down, and that was his problem in the limited snaps he saw last season. Chances are good that the only way Gardner settles down is decent real game experience. He needed to play significantly in last season's non-conference schedule, but with a lost half against WMU and Robinson needing learning snaps that wasn't possible. This year's non-conference schedule doesn't look really condusive to Gardner playing time either.

This team is in some trouble if Robinson misses significant time, no matter which backup comes in to replace him.