Spring Stuff, 2017: Offense Comment Count

Brian

The following folks did not play and are thus unmentioned: Drake Harris, Juwann Bushell-Beatty, Nolan Ulizio, Ian Bunting, JaRaymond Hall.

In addition, a few guys got the you're-a-starter hook: Mason Cole, Chris Evans, and Kekoa Crawford were only out there briefly.

A little more feelingsball

34022452206_a29eeae8b9_z

HI [Bryan Fuller]

That was fun! I enjoyed it. The weather was terrific and the game was sort of an actual one insofar as OL depth permitted it and there was football to be observed and conclusions to be drawn from that football. At no point did anyone put on a little mesh hat so they could run an hour of kickoff drills.

Jim Harbaugh may be completely unpredictable in many things—he did not talk to reporters after the spring game, oddly—but he's made Michigan football very fun. I appreciated this on Saturday, sitting outside and watching the actual football. So, it seems, did many other people: I've usually just driven to the Crisler parking lot and parked. This would have been impossible on Saturday. The announced attendance (57,000 and change) was a totally made up number but it seemed plausible. What a nice change.

Highlights

Quarterback

33929833052_973895571d_z

[Patrick Barron]

So... this might be a thing. If you recall, last year we entered the spring game expecting John O'Korn to be the starter; there had been some mumbles that Wilton Speight was right in the thick of it that most people discounted because of previous mumbles about how great O'Korn looked in practice. The spring game was an inflection point:

I am now convinced it's a real competition. Wilton Speight only had six attempts, but he completed five of them, confidently. I also had the benefit of observing the Ford Field practice, where nobody seemed clearly ahead of the pack at quarterback. Another piece of evidence in favor of a real competition: no quarterback got a quick you're-a-starter hook. John O'Korn is not a lock.

On Saturday Speight didn't get a you're-a-starter hook. He got a you-threw-a-101-yard-pick-six hook. John O'Korn took over for his team's final two drives, driving for touchdowns on both. Meanwhile, Brandon Peters did this:

One pick six marred an otherwise confident and accurate performance. The two best throws in there are probably the ones to Nate Schoenle, about whom more in a second. The first was a third and long conversion at 4:30 that looks a lot like the guy we saw on Peters's high school tape—unusually, I mean that as a compliment. He's got his guy, he knows it, and he tosses an accurate, catchable ball. Peters's ability to vary speeds is uncanny for a young quarterback, and it's good to see some of that is translating to college.

The second is the Schoenle wheel route to open the winning drive, which is just... dang, man. That's a hell of a throw, and Peters was making it most of the day despite a strong and swirling wind. (The earlier fade down the sideline that Jordan Glasgow got over the top on felt like it had been pushed by that wind.)

Peters moved decisively to get out of the pocket when necessary, scrambled for a touchdown, did not throw into coverage much, and was accurate on all but a couple throws. He looked very plausible at the same time Speight struggled.

As always you do not want to read too much into a disjointed, pressure-laden spring game. Unlike last year's QB competition this one has an incumbent. It's always hard to dislodge a guy who has a season under his belt, especially a guy who was reasonably good last year. Speight finished third in the league in passer rating and #2, Perry Hills, had 18 attempts a game. He's still the starter, probably. The spring game added "probably" to that sentence.

Running back

33928544601_f1da79c02c_z

easy for Isaac [Eric Upchurch]

Chris Evans got three carries and then sat for the day, in case you were wondering if he was a sure-fire starter. That's the same playing time De'Veon Smith got last year. Evans looked as shifty as he did a year ago but may have added some extra YAC power; hard to tell in that brief glimpse.

So instead of that let me tell you a thing about Evans: he coaches a local kids flag football team. This in and of itself is odd and very, very Harbaugh. An acquaintance of mine relates that his kid is in this flag football league, and that his game was at 7:15 in the morning, with a potential second game at 9:30 if his kids' team won. Chris Evans is at this game. Not because his team is playing—his team is the one waiting for the winner at 9:30. Chris Evans is... taking notes? Watching intently? Is Chris Evans, starting Michigan running back, scouting a flag football game at 7 in the morning? Yes. Yes he is.

One other Evans-related note: while he didn't participate in much of it, I'd be surprised if the frequent five-wide shotgun looks weren't related to his ability to catch the ball out of the backfield. Hopefully Michigan gets on the good side of that McCray-Dalvin Cook go route matchup this year.

In Evans's absence we got a lot of Karan Higdon (12 carries to lead everyone), Kareem Walker, Ty Isaac, and walk-ons. Higdon and Isaac looked like Higdon and Isaac; both were the beneficiaries of the second-team DTs getting consistently gashed. I continue to like Higdon's combination of sharp cuts and low pad level and think he'll a productive #2. Isaac looks fine, but his touchdown was untouched and he didn't make a ton on his own. Walker didn't get a ton of opportunity he did have another run like he did last year where he bounced off some tackles to gain additional yards.

Your walk-on du jour here is Tru Wilson, who was quick through the hole and very small. Very little chance he breaks through the five scholarship guys who will be on campus this fall.

Wide Receiver and Tight End

34016446456_df490cb58f_z

Black can go get it [Eric Upchurch]

The wide receivers are going to be young but that might not matter. Kekoa Crawford got a quick hook and can be penciled in as a starter. Donovan Peoples-Jones and Tarik Black certainly look the part already. DPJ was held relatively in check by Keith Washington, and I'm already like "impressive job, Keith Washington" when he's been on campus for two years and DPJ has been on campus for two months.

Black played the part of Guy Opposite Dennis Norfleet on O'Korn's touchdown drives, running the same fade over and over against Benjamin St-Juste for completions and flags. Black is bouncy, 6'4", and adjusts well to balls in the air. He's all right. Meanwhile, Brandon Brown got a shot of Nico Collins veritably looming on the sidelines.

xOhSI7s (1)

The guy behind him to the right is 6'2" Brad Hawkins. Collins is huge. Collins, Black, DPJ, and Hawkins are a veritable fleet of catching-radius guys who can go get contested balls and make quarterbacks right. That is one recruiting class. Also they got Oliver Martin. I'd managed to forget how ridiculous this WR class was.

In the slot, Eddie McDoom was doing McDoom things before an apparently ankle injury knocked him out. On replay that injury didn't seem too bad: there was no plant or twist. Ankle injuries generally don't keep guys out months and months, so he's probably going to be fine this year. Here's hoping, because I don't want to disappoint this guy.

Curse everything in the world that prevents us from selling that.

Also in the slot was walk-on Nate Schoenle, who was on the receiving end of Peters's best throws of the day. One was a tough diving catch on the game-winning drive. At 6'2" Schoenle gives you downfield ability a lot of slots lack and Peters is clearly comfortable with him; I mentioned him as a guy generating buzz before the game and he'll generate more of it now. Nate Johnson didn't get a target, IIRC. Schoenle looks like a real threat for slot PT.

[UPDATE: Johnson did make a catch, fumbling as he fought for extra yardage.]

So with all that it's getting late early for Drake Harris and Moe Ways. Harris did not participate, and for a guy with his injury history facing down this wide receiver class that is tough. Ways did play but not until the second half when the rotation was getting deep indeed. Two of his plays were questionable, as well. He ran a four yard route on third and five; he messed up his footwork so badly on a back-shoulder fade that both of his feet were out of bounds on a potential touchdown. (Ambry Thomas got hit with a flag for holding him, FWIW.)

33956587031_0dfa7757b6_z

Eubanks looks the part now [Patrick Barron]

At tight end Nick Eubanks appears to have made a move. He looks like a tight end now, which is step one. He was also targeted frequently. Michigan only found middling success doing so; the sheer number of balls he saw implies he's been making plays this spring. Here he only almost made a play, dropping a tough fade route from Peters after executing a textbook Manningham slow-and-extend to wall off the safety he'd gotten over the top of.

As a recruit Eubanks was regarded as a crazy athlete who needed seasoning. He's probably a year away from delivering on that athleticism; he certainly looks the part now.

Zach Gentry, meanwhile, both does and does not. Does he look like a tight end? No.

33678589500_6542b9987b_z

no [Bryan Fuller]

Does he look like Jeff Samardadjzijaadfh? Kind of. Except tall!

That's a busted coverage and not exactly black-belt receivering but just look at the guy and his long loping strides and ability to shake enough to put not-Kovacs on his butt. Spring reports frequently noted that Gentry fielded a ton of targets, and sure if I'm a quarterback I'll look for the guy who puts Jake Butt's catching radius to shame. I feel a Funchess move coming on.

Ty Wheatley Jr is Michigan's sole remaining Kaiju, and that makes me sad. When I checked out his blocking that made me happy, though. He had another of his catches where he looks implausibly fast for a large man, and with Asiasi's departure he's going to get a ton of PT; he's Michigan's top blocking TE by a mile now and he brings a two-way ability that could be lethal. Just has to develop a bit.

Offensive line

33220714064_6e06fec351_z

if Runyan could be a real RT candidate that would be nice [Bryan Fuller]

The spring game format seemed designed to keep the defensive line from annihilating everyone and succeed in that regard. The starting line, or close to it, was kept together; the backups mostly got Michigan's second-team DL. And while those second-team DTs are huge alarm bells, that's another post.

This is for this post: I was pleasantly surprised by the lack of defenders swallowing a tailback two yards in the backfield. Setting aside five yards lost when Kareem Walker unwisely decided to reverse field, Michigan backs were TFLed for a total of six yards. That means that the OL was getting its assignments right virtually the whole day. I don't expect that when one OL is playing deep into the regular season; for two to mostly get it right in spring, with all the rotation they've been doing, is impressive. Steve Lorenz keeps bringing up the Ewing Theory in relation to the OL departures...

3. I'm sticking with my Ewing Theory belief on the offensive line's potential in 2017. Ace Anbender at MGoBlog picked out former PWO Andrew Vastardis as a guy who stood out today and I'm inclined to agree. Vastardis was one of three or four PWOs last cycle the staff believed would, not could, be a difference maker sooner rather than later. He's not going to start this season, but he was a good indicator that a lot of guys have improved this off-season. Cesar Ruiz is ready. The pieces still need to be shuffled out, mainly at right tackle, but holes were paved consistently today.

...and I can see that. If Michigan can field a line that doesn't have a guy who runs by first-level defenders on the regular that would be good for their YPC and my blood pressure.

Your starter-ish line was: Cole/Bredeson/Kugler/Onwenu/Runyan, with Cesar Ruiz and Andrew Vastardis from the second unit impressing both myself and Ace. Given the context...

...we shouldn't anoint the guy as Glasgow 4.0 just yet. Straight up dominating some bad players is a good first step, and he did that. Most of Michigan's big runs came when the second-team DL got caved in by the second-team OL.

Also in walk-ons I'd love to get lucky on: ominously-named Greg Robinson has plausible size at 6'6" 290, per a yet-to-be-updated roster, and played a bunch at left tackle. He got blown up on a couple runs and did not seem nearly as fluid as Vastardis.

Ruiz got some run at guard in the second half, FWIW, but Bredeson never kicked out to tackle. These things seem to be contradictory since the OL with Ruiz at guard necessarily has Bredeson at RT. Michigan either 1) thinks Bredeson can't play tackle, 2) thinks he needs all the time at guard he can get to get ready for the season, or 3) thinks a guy on the roster is a capable RT. That latter could be Bushell-Beatty, who we did not see because of injury, or Runyan. Your author is guessing that #2 is the truthiest here, after Bredeson's understandably error-prone freshman year.

Blitz pickups were pretty bad; unclear if that was a tailback issue or a QB issue or an OL issue. Probably some of all three. Blitz pickups in spring against Don Brown and squat missile dude Devin Bush were always going to be a problem. They are a problem. It would only be notable if they were not a problem.

Comments

Ron Utah

April 17th, 2017 at 1:35 PM ^

I think Higdon was one of the best performers of the day, if not the best.  His vision was great, his cuts were sharp, and he seems even quicker than last year.  I agree that he deserves to be lauded for all of those things.  I also agree that, to my eye, he is at least equal to Evans as a runner.  His production on Saturday was awesome, but watching him looked even better.  This will be our best RB group in a decade, IMO.

I would add, however, that it does appear that Evans has the lead in the competition, but this is largely a nominal distinction--I expect them to get roughly equal carries for the season and the "hot hand" to get more during certain games.

The last thing I'll say is that while it would have been nice for Brian to point out Karan's accomplishments, and even nicer for him to notice the improvement, that none of this really matters.  If Higdon earns the job, he'll have it, and his play does all the talking that is necessary.  Love that you back him up, but he doesn't need it--he's a damn fine RB and I expect he'll have a great 2017.

Ziff72

April 17th, 2017 at 1:36 PM ^

I love Higdon's running style and I'm pulling for him.  As someone close to him have you discussed the play against Ohio St last year  when he made the wrong cut that cost him potentially 20+ yards? 

I'm curious if you discussed the play with him and if you have was there anything a fan might find interesting about what happened that we could never know?  

Thanks and keep up with the good insight.  I appreciate it.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 1:47 PM ^

It was the same play he scored on in the Rutgers and PSU game. McMillan crossed Masons face and it was a difficult block. In order to make the cut people are talking about....Karan would've had to anticipate it upon receiving the hand off and go against the design of the play. Impossible? No. But as a guy not being featured per say and with only a handful of snaps in this game...he tried to execute the play as it was called. The right tackle was not running free to the right as a leader blocker for nothing. The play required a great block from Cole and he didn't quite get there. Karan didn't anticipate it and make a middle field cut. I chalk it up to Raekwon making a play Raekwon makes.

umbig11

April 17th, 2017 at 2:06 PM ^

He is the best "inside" runner we have. Evans' role is a little different and he will get the starts. The 1-2 is Evans/Higdon, with Walker and Isaac getting some carries.

Mr. Yost

April 17th, 2017 at 11:32 PM ^

...is that an internet threat?

Why are you so defensive over Karan? He plays sports...you don't have to be Michael Jordan to have some doubters when you play sports. I don't care what sport or what level. As for this topic, not everyone is going to see it your way.

You disagree with Brian, that's okay. Hell, I disgree with the OL analysis...I thought Onwenu looked terrible. Speight was bad, but he got no help, IMO. That was a much "rosier" take on the OL than I would've written. Mine would've said we have Cole, Bredeson and "eeek" let's hope guys develop - positive, Ruiz and Kugler both looked fine with shotgun snaps for the most part.

But the tough guy deal is silly. You sound like you're his big brother and he's 4 years old and can't defend himself or he's not old enough to shrug it off as yet one more person doubting him (even though I don't think Brian was doubting him).

MichiganMan14

April 18th, 2017 at 1:32 AM ^

Not sure where that is coming from. This argument is old and tired. The running backs that played on Saturday did well. Evans looked quick and has put on good weight. Should be a nice stable this year. Still need a power back to emerge but those carries likely go to Khalid Hill this year. Over this whole deal. Spring game analysis should cover the actual spring game. Not adjacent information about the guy you wanted to write about that didn't play much in the game.

Mr. Yost

April 18th, 2017 at 10:06 PM ^

Your opinion. But bottom line is you don't run the site...Brian does and to be honest, he can write about whatever he damn well pleases.

Doesn't mean you, or I have to like it. In this instance, you don't like it...there have been plenty of other times where I may not have liked or agreed with what he wrote. But I'll be damn if I'm going to get bent out of shape on what something does on their own website.

For the rest us...well, heck yeah I'll have an opinion, lol.

boliver46

April 17th, 2017 at 1:22 PM ^

I know folks are always clamoring for the back-up...

But pretty sure I saw a few batted balls on Peters.  With him being GIGANTIC - is there something about his throwing motion that makes him more susceptible?  

On one, guy who batted it had barely left the ground and was able to get a hand on what looked like an attempted mid-distance throw...

Monocle Smile

April 17th, 2017 at 1:27 PM ^

Peters is big, but not gigantic. Speight is larger.

The batted balls were both Hurst, and on the second one he lunged forward and swatted it basically as soon as it left Peters' hand. Hurst is not a small dude.

boliver46

April 17th, 2017 at 2:23 PM ^

isn't huge to you?

Ok then, Sasquatch.

I'm 6'3" and he verily towers over me.  But ok then.

And you proved my point saying he lunged FORWARD and not UP. 

In reply to by boliver46

pescadero

April 17th, 2017 at 2:34 PM ^

6'5" is TALL not huge... and he's probably more like 6'3" or 6'4".

 

I played basketball in HS against a guy that was 6'8", 210 lbs. He wasn't huge, just tall.

 

In reply to by boliver46

Monocle Smile

April 17th, 2017 at 3:13 PM ^

Speight is 6'6" and heavier than Peters. Both are technically bigger than me, but Peters is barely taller and not much heavier. JBB, Newsome, Ty Wheatley...those guys are gigantic.

Hurst isn't small, either, and had full arm extension to bat the ball. When you're close to the QB and he's throwing a dart over the middle, you don't need to execute a volleyball block. Watch the play again. Throwing a football isn't like a jump shot where a taller dude can just lob it over a defender easily.

Ron Utah

April 17th, 2017 at 1:37 PM ^

His throwing motion is a bit low.  That's also a reason he has a quick release, compact motion, and can fire darts into small windows.

Also, Hurst is a beast.  He'll block a few more passes this season.

Pepto Bismol

April 17th, 2017 at 1:54 PM ^

I keep reading that Crawford was quickly pulled.  I'm currently watching the 3rd quarter, and he's still running routes.

Update: Made catch on last play of 3rd, ran route on first play of the 4th.

Pepto Bismol

April 17th, 2017 at 7:17 PM ^

Glad you appreciate it. Also, Nate Johnson had a catch (Brian said he didn't get a target) and Moe Ways was sprinting behind Gentry into the end zone on the game's first TD (Brian says Ways didn't play til the 2nd). Does it matter in the grand scheme? Not at all. But if you want me to care about your positional breakdown, yeah, kind of does. I don't know how much you're really paying attention if you tell me Crawford was yanked starter-style when I watched the dude play the entire friggin' game.

Trader Jack

April 18th, 2017 at 9:15 AM ^

Yes, it does. Like when you kept saying Higdon's first TD was against the starting front 7, even though both starting DTs were out of the game. Sometimes people just make mistakes, it's ok.

UMQuadz05

April 17th, 2017 at 1:27 PM ^

You know, an OL of:

Cole/Bredeson/Kugler/Onwenu/somebody

doesn't fill me with nearly as much panic as I thought it would.  It sucks we don't have Newsome, but this group could be...OK?  And there are a few bullets in the chamber in case this particular lineup doesn't work out. 

Kevin13

April 17th, 2017 at 1:29 PM ^

I thought the OL actually did a decent job during the game. I think the sooner they can settle on a starting 5 and get them working together as a unit the better off we will be. Guess need to see a couple of the young guys this fall, but I think there is enough talent there to have a good line this year.

Rabbit21

April 17th, 2017 at 1:31 PM ^

The Ewing theory on the OL is an interesting one and semi-plausible if the issue with the OL was more being able to process assignments in time.  Wonder if it more comes down to having both Drevno and Frey working on the OL and helping with assignments and explaining the frame of the play.

Rabbit21

April 17th, 2017 at 1:56 PM ^

Completely fair and I'm with you, but if nothing else it's a reason to have some hope and I think it's an interesting take.  

Realistically, I think this team is looking at 7-5 primarily because of OL issues.  If they do better than that, I think it will be because the Ewing theory has some merit.  

Whole Milk

April 17th, 2017 at 3:51 PM ^

7-5 is about as low of a projection as I have seen. Just taking a look at the schedule, I assume you would have them losing all of their games against good-great teams (Florida, Wisc, Penn State, OSU), and losing one to their average or worse group? I personally just think a lot would have to go wrong to lose five games. I think it's safe to assume 8-4 is the floor, assuming of course that the DL doesn't get decimated by injury.

Rabbit21

April 17th, 2017 at 4:20 PM ^

tl:dr I fully expect this record but won't be going to Ann Arbor torch and pitchfork over it.

It's a young team and I'll believe Michigan can win a big game in the spotlight when I see it.

I think the defense will be good, but will break at critical moments due to youth/growing pains/lack of depth and there just will not be the horses on the O-Line for the offense to push past.

So yeah, I have Florida, Wisconsin, Penn St., and OSU as losses, along with an expectation of something stupid happening in at least one of the other games.  I have a lot of faith in Harbaugh and a lot of faith in this team, BUT it is really young and has some key weaknesses, along with a mentality of blowing it in the clutch that takes a while to fix.  

I expect this to be a growing/learning year, setting the team up for big years down the stretch, I'm not being pessimistic, more just taking into account how much struggles on the O-Line have defined previous Michigan seasons.  

 

bronxblue

April 17th, 2017 at 7:12 PM ^

I have no idea why people are assuming Florida is a loss. What in the past 2 years would lead people to believe a Harbaugh-led team would be beaten by a Jim Mcelwain team, especially one with a lot of player losses the past couple of years and below-average (for Florida) recruiting behind it.

MI Expat NY

April 17th, 2017 at 1:49 PM ^

Isn't it a misuse of the term "Ewing theory," though?  If you understand the Ewing theory to be a team improves after a star player is lost, usually because the team is better suited to play a style that doesn't work for the star player, then how does that relate to the O-Line.  Certainly we didn't lose any stars.  We lost three guys that ranged from "eh" to servicable to somewhere in the ok/good range.  Hardly qualifies for Ewing theory.

That said, I would obviously be happy if O-Line was actually an improvement on last year despite being young/thin.  I was cautiously of the opinion that they would perform on the same level as last season.  It would be great to do better than that.  

MI Expat NY

April 17th, 2017 at 2:18 PM ^

Yeah, I mean, I get it.  Team is losing guys and thus evryone expects to take a step back, but there's a possibility that things actually improve.  In the vaguest sense it fits.  But in reality, replacing a position group that was experienced but never really excelled with young, talented players and actually taking a small step forward isn't really an oddity in college football.  It would make more sense using Ewing Theory as a shorthand if the line was really good last year.

On the other hand, it's not like Bill Simmons ever used "Ewing Theory" in a coherent manner.  

 

Magnus

April 17th, 2017 at 1:40 PM ^

I may be wrong, but I do think Bredeson played a bit of right tackle at one point in the second half of the spring game. I don't think he was in there for long, but it was at least a couple plays.

Mongo

April 17th, 2017 at 1:59 PM ^

I think Frey could take just the PWO guys and deliver a competitive OL. My expectations are huge from what I saw on the tape of the spring game, despite needing more pass pro work (but who is going to stop our 1st team DL anyway?). Frey could be JH's best hire, next to Brown. This season will be better than folks realize because of Frey and the future is very bright for Michigan's OL culture. Drevno can now concentrate on game planning opponents versus OL development, which is also huge for in-season success.

OwenGoBlue

April 17th, 2017 at 2:37 PM ^

I was impressed. I'm not that stressed about DL depth (DT logic outlined below), but some of that is based on thinking Ron Johnson was largely at DT for spring depth/building versatility purposes. You hear anything on him during the spring? Seems like Luiji will be able to play on passing downs from day one based on his tape/all star game performance but would be great to have another guy there. SDE depth with Kemp/Jeter/new guys seems like it will be fine.

Mr. Yost

April 17th, 2017 at 6:19 PM ^

If they were, they had their head in the sand. 

CB is the only position where I think people were "iffy" and probably still are to some extent. Every other position is just about the same or better...as you mention, it's the depth that has to be developed, but we have so many quality, talented, highly regarded young players that even that isn't worry losing sleep over. Especially on a Harbaugh team. For example, if Kwity Paye is playing...you know what his job is. That will be his only job all year.

Harbaugh's great at using the strength of guys until the rest catches up. So for Kwity...use that speed and go get the QB in obvious passing situations. We'll worry about holding up against the run throughout the year in practice...but when you're in during the game? See ball. Get ball. That's it.

Just like McDoom last year. Or even Chris Evans early on until the rest caught up.

Anyway...I don't think too many people expected a significant dip. Everything I've seen on here is people saying they don't expect to be #1 again, but this can be a top 10 defense. If we can replace Jourdan and Channing at a reasonable level, we're fine. In some ways we're better because the players Brown recruited for his system will be playing.

Mr. Yost

April 17th, 2017 at 11:50 PM ^

I agree with just about everything he posts...but disagree once and it drudges up some memories I see. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

"Not much dropoff, right?" to me implied that a good amount of us felt there would be more than "not much" dropoff. I honestly haven't seen one person even hint at that and I'm on this board every single day.

If you would've posted "How about those ILBs? Faster, right?" Everyone would've had the same reaction I did to umbig11's post. It was pretty much a given when you swap Bush for Gedeon and knowing what Hudson brings to the table.

As I said, most everyone has said for months that we expect no dropoff with the starting defense (every caveat I've seen is the CBs and a few folks have mentioned Winovich vs. late-season Charlton).

Anyways - I give the credit (see our exchange in Magus' TTB preview threads), that one seemed obvious. If it was in reference to the caveats above or WRs, TEs, OL, K, or P...it makes perfect sense. Those are the areas where people (both M fans and non-M fans) have been discussing us taking a step back.

OwenGoBlue

April 17th, 2017 at 2:31 PM ^

Looking forward to the D post with the DTs. I'm not super alarmed just yet given that Dwumfour was out, a mass influx of DL talent comes in during the summer and Gary will undoubtedly get some snaps inside (even if those are just scattered passing downs). Aubrey is ready to play a role so thinking they just need to find 40ish good snaps/game out of Dwumfour/Hudson/Marshall/Myers/DIB/Paea.