Spring Stuff, 2017: Offense Comment Count

Brian

The following folks did not play and are thus unmentioned: Drake Harris, Juwann Bushell-Beatty, Nolan Ulizio, Ian Bunting, JaRaymond Hall.

In addition, a few guys got the you're-a-starter hook: Mason Cole, Chris Evans, and Kekoa Crawford were only out there briefly.

A little more feelingsball

34022452206_a29eeae8b9_z

HI [Bryan Fuller]

That was fun! I enjoyed it. The weather was terrific and the game was sort of an actual one insofar as OL depth permitted it and there was football to be observed and conclusions to be drawn from that football. At no point did anyone put on a little mesh hat so they could run an hour of kickoff drills.

Jim Harbaugh may be completely unpredictable in many things—he did not talk to reporters after the spring game, oddly—but he's made Michigan football very fun. I appreciated this on Saturday, sitting outside and watching the actual football. So, it seems, did many other people: I've usually just driven to the Crisler parking lot and parked. This would have been impossible on Saturday. The announced attendance (57,000 and change) was a totally made up number but it seemed plausible. What a nice change.

Highlights

Quarterback

33929833052_973895571d_z

[Patrick Barron]

So... this might be a thing. If you recall, last year we entered the spring game expecting John O'Korn to be the starter; there had been some mumbles that Wilton Speight was right in the thick of it that most people discounted because of previous mumbles about how great O'Korn looked in practice. The spring game was an inflection point:

I am now convinced it's a real competition. Wilton Speight only had six attempts, but he completed five of them, confidently. I also had the benefit of observing the Ford Field practice, where nobody seemed clearly ahead of the pack at quarterback. Another piece of evidence in favor of a real competition: no quarterback got a quick you're-a-starter hook. John O'Korn is not a lock.

On Saturday Speight didn't get a you're-a-starter hook. He got a you-threw-a-101-yard-pick-six hook. John O'Korn took over for his team's final two drives, driving for touchdowns on both. Meanwhile, Brandon Peters did this:

One pick six marred an otherwise confident and accurate performance. The two best throws in there are probably the ones to Nate Schoenle, about whom more in a second. The first was a third and long conversion at 4:30 that looks a lot like the guy we saw on Peters's high school tape—unusually, I mean that as a compliment. He's got his guy, he knows it, and he tosses an accurate, catchable ball. Peters's ability to vary speeds is uncanny for a young quarterback, and it's good to see some of that is translating to college.

The second is the Schoenle wheel route to open the winning drive, which is just... dang, man. That's a hell of a throw, and Peters was making it most of the day despite a strong and swirling wind. (The earlier fade down the sideline that Jordan Glasgow got over the top on felt like it had been pushed by that wind.)

Peters moved decisively to get out of the pocket when necessary, scrambled for a touchdown, did not throw into coverage much, and was accurate on all but a couple throws. He looked very plausible at the same time Speight struggled.

As always you do not want to read too much into a disjointed, pressure-laden spring game. Unlike last year's QB competition this one has an incumbent. It's always hard to dislodge a guy who has a season under his belt, especially a guy who was reasonably good last year. Speight finished third in the league in passer rating and #2, Perry Hills, had 18 attempts a game. He's still the starter, probably. The spring game added "probably" to that sentence.

Running back

33928544601_f1da79c02c_z

easy for Isaac [Eric Upchurch]

Chris Evans got three carries and then sat for the day, in case you were wondering if he was a sure-fire starter. That's the same playing time De'Veon Smith got last year. Evans looked as shifty as he did a year ago but may have added some extra YAC power; hard to tell in that brief glimpse.

So instead of that let me tell you a thing about Evans: he coaches a local kids flag football team. This in and of itself is odd and very, very Harbaugh. An acquaintance of mine relates that his kid is in this flag football league, and that his game was at 7:15 in the morning, with a potential second game at 9:30 if his kids' team won. Chris Evans is at this game. Not because his team is playing—his team is the one waiting for the winner at 9:30. Chris Evans is... taking notes? Watching intently? Is Chris Evans, starting Michigan running back, scouting a flag football game at 7 in the morning? Yes. Yes he is.

One other Evans-related note: while he didn't participate in much of it, I'd be surprised if the frequent five-wide shotgun looks weren't related to his ability to catch the ball out of the backfield. Hopefully Michigan gets on the good side of that McCray-Dalvin Cook go route matchup this year.

In Evans's absence we got a lot of Karan Higdon (12 carries to lead everyone), Kareem Walker, Ty Isaac, and walk-ons. Higdon and Isaac looked like Higdon and Isaac; both were the beneficiaries of the second-team DTs getting consistently gashed. I continue to like Higdon's combination of sharp cuts and low pad level and think he'll a productive #2. Isaac looks fine, but his touchdown was untouched and he didn't make a ton on his own. Walker didn't get a ton of opportunity he did have another run like he did last year where he bounced off some tackles to gain additional yards.

Your walk-on du jour here is Tru Wilson, who was quick through the hole and very small. Very little chance he breaks through the five scholarship guys who will be on campus this fall.

Wide Receiver and Tight End

34016446456_df490cb58f_z

Black can go get it [Eric Upchurch]

The wide receivers are going to be young but that might not matter. Kekoa Crawford got a quick hook and can be penciled in as a starter. Donovan Peoples-Jones and Tarik Black certainly look the part already. DPJ was held relatively in check by Keith Washington, and I'm already like "impressive job, Keith Washington" when he's been on campus for two years and DPJ has been on campus for two months.

Black played the part of Guy Opposite Dennis Norfleet on O'Korn's touchdown drives, running the same fade over and over against Benjamin St-Juste for completions and flags. Black is bouncy, 6'4", and adjusts well to balls in the air. He's all right. Meanwhile, Brandon Brown got a shot of Nico Collins veritably looming on the sidelines.

xOhSI7s (1)

The guy behind him to the right is 6'2" Brad Hawkins. Collins is huge. Collins, Black, DPJ, and Hawkins are a veritable fleet of catching-radius guys who can go get contested balls and make quarterbacks right. That is one recruiting class. Also they got Oliver Martin. I'd managed to forget how ridiculous this WR class was.

In the slot, Eddie McDoom was doing McDoom things before an apparently ankle injury knocked him out. On replay that injury didn't seem too bad: there was no plant or twist. Ankle injuries generally don't keep guys out months and months, so he's probably going to be fine this year. Here's hoping, because I don't want to disappoint this guy.

Curse everything in the world that prevents us from selling that.

Also in the slot was walk-on Nate Schoenle, who was on the receiving end of Peters's best throws of the day. One was a tough diving catch on the game-winning drive. At 6'2" Schoenle gives you downfield ability a lot of slots lack and Peters is clearly comfortable with him; I mentioned him as a guy generating buzz before the game and he'll generate more of it now. Nate Johnson didn't get a target, IIRC. Schoenle looks like a real threat for slot PT.

[UPDATE: Johnson did make a catch, fumbling as he fought for extra yardage.]

So with all that it's getting late early for Drake Harris and Moe Ways. Harris did not participate, and for a guy with his injury history facing down this wide receiver class that is tough. Ways did play but not until the second half when the rotation was getting deep indeed. Two of his plays were questionable, as well. He ran a four yard route on third and five; he messed up his footwork so badly on a back-shoulder fade that both of his feet were out of bounds on a potential touchdown. (Ambry Thomas got hit with a flag for holding him, FWIW.)

33956587031_0dfa7757b6_z

Eubanks looks the part now [Patrick Barron]

At tight end Nick Eubanks appears to have made a move. He looks like a tight end now, which is step one. He was also targeted frequently. Michigan only found middling success doing so; the sheer number of balls he saw implies he's been making plays this spring. Here he only almost made a play, dropping a tough fade route from Peters after executing a textbook Manningham slow-and-extend to wall off the safety he'd gotten over the top of.

As a recruit Eubanks was regarded as a crazy athlete who needed seasoning. He's probably a year away from delivering on that athleticism; he certainly looks the part now.

Zach Gentry, meanwhile, both does and does not. Does he look like a tight end? No.

33678589500_6542b9987b_z

no [Bryan Fuller]

Does he look like Jeff Samardadjzijaadfh? Kind of. Except tall!

That's a busted coverage and not exactly black-belt receivering but just look at the guy and his long loping strides and ability to shake enough to put not-Kovacs on his butt. Spring reports frequently noted that Gentry fielded a ton of targets, and sure if I'm a quarterback I'll look for the guy who puts Jake Butt's catching radius to shame. I feel a Funchess move coming on.

Ty Wheatley Jr is Michigan's sole remaining Kaiju, and that makes me sad. When I checked out his blocking that made me happy, though. He had another of his catches where he looks implausibly fast for a large man, and with Asiasi's departure he's going to get a ton of PT; he's Michigan's top blocking TE by a mile now and he brings a two-way ability that could be lethal. Just has to develop a bit.

Offensive line

33220714064_6e06fec351_z

if Runyan could be a real RT candidate that would be nice [Bryan Fuller]

The spring game format seemed designed to keep the defensive line from annihilating everyone and succeed in that regard. The starting line, or close to it, was kept together; the backups mostly got Michigan's second-team DL. And while those second-team DTs are huge alarm bells, that's another post.

This is for this post: I was pleasantly surprised by the lack of defenders swallowing a tailback two yards in the backfield. Setting aside five yards lost when Kareem Walker unwisely decided to reverse field, Michigan backs were TFLed for a total of six yards. That means that the OL was getting its assignments right virtually the whole day. I don't expect that when one OL is playing deep into the regular season; for two to mostly get it right in spring, with all the rotation they've been doing, is impressive. Steve Lorenz keeps bringing up the Ewing Theory in relation to the OL departures...

3. I'm sticking with my Ewing Theory belief on the offensive line's potential in 2017. Ace Anbender at MGoBlog picked out former PWO Andrew Vastardis as a guy who stood out today and I'm inclined to agree. Vastardis was one of three or four PWOs last cycle the staff believed would, not could, be a difference maker sooner rather than later. He's not going to start this season, but he was a good indicator that a lot of guys have improved this off-season. Cesar Ruiz is ready. The pieces still need to be shuffled out, mainly at right tackle, but holes were paved consistently today.

...and I can see that. If Michigan can field a line that doesn't have a guy who runs by first-level defenders on the regular that would be good for their YPC and my blood pressure.

Your starter-ish line was: Cole/Bredeson/Kugler/Onwenu/Runyan, with Cesar Ruiz and Andrew Vastardis from the second unit impressing both myself and Ace. Given the context...

...we shouldn't anoint the guy as Glasgow 4.0 just yet. Straight up dominating some bad players is a good first step, and he did that. Most of Michigan's big runs came when the second-team DL got caved in by the second-team OL.

Also in walk-ons I'd love to get lucky on: ominously-named Greg Robinson has plausible size at 6'6" 290, per a yet-to-be-updated roster, and played a bunch at left tackle. He got blown up on a couple runs and did not seem nearly as fluid as Vastardis.

Ruiz got some run at guard in the second half, FWIW, but Bredeson never kicked out to tackle. These things seem to be contradictory since the OL with Ruiz at guard necessarily has Bredeson at RT. Michigan either 1) thinks Bredeson can't play tackle, 2) thinks he needs all the time at guard he can get to get ready for the season, or 3) thinks a guy on the roster is a capable RT. That latter could be Bushell-Beatty, who we did not see because of injury, or Runyan. Your author is guessing that #2 is the truthiest here, after Bredeson's understandably error-prone freshman year.

Blitz pickups were pretty bad; unclear if that was a tailback issue or a QB issue or an OL issue. Probably some of all three. Blitz pickups in spring against Don Brown and squat missile dude Devin Bush were always going to be a problem. They are a problem. It would only be notable if they were not a problem.

Comments

Magnus

April 18th, 2017 at 12:39 PM ^

There's not a whole lot of meaning behind your stats, and here's why: 

Ty Isaac had a higher YPC average (9.4 to 6.8), had the longest run of the day (28 to Higdon's 27), and scored 1 TD on fewer than half the carries (so Isaac would have been on pace to score 2.4 TDs on 12 carries).

I don't see you propping up Isaac and saying he and Evans and Higdon are all neck-and-neck or equals. If spring game stats are all that matters, then here's the pecking order:

1. Ty Isaac
2. Tru Wilson
3. Karan Higdon
4. Chris Evans
5. Kareem Walker

Also, TDs can be an overrated stat. Higdon's first TD was a nice run, but plunging in from 2 yards out in the 4th quarter? Any one of the backs could have scored that second TD. If scoring TDs determines what the depth chart should look like, then Khalid Hill needs to be The Man.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 5:16 PM ^

The Spring Game was a success and the young talent looked great. Even if you want to take it THERE....Karan scored twice and we had a section of family to see it. Butt hurt? No sir. Lol. Saturday was a great day all around.

Gulogulo37

April 17th, 2017 at 10:30 PM ^

Except Brian is singing the praises of Higdon. He's just singing Evans' praises more. That's what's so dumb about his ranting. Not to mention he could take a second to organize his thoughts or spellcheck. Looks like he's just furiously pounding the keyboard.

Trader Jack

April 17th, 2017 at 2:00 PM ^

Describing Brian's comments on Higdon as politically motivated marginalization comes off as petty, biased, and unfair. The PT Evans received during the spring game is representative of someone who the staff expects to rely on as a starter. Higdon looked great and if he's earned the right to play in the coaches eyes, he will. You know that. Right now, based on what Brian is obviously hearing from sources inside the program and spring game PT, Chris Evans looks to be in line to start. What's wrong with him saying that? Most of the section on Evans above was about him coaching a youth football team anyway... no need to get up in arms about him getting more ink than Karan when the majority of it is about something off the field.

Monocle Smile

April 17th, 2017 at 4:51 PM ^

M-Dog's charactization of a Little League dad is pretty-spot on. If that quote gets you upset enough to make baseless, laughable accusations directed towards Brian, then you need to step away for your own sake because you're starting to put a foot into helicopter territory.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 4:59 PM ^

Little league Dad. If that's your opinion of me then that is fine. I called out factually incorrect information. I also speak to the people in the program to include the past and current running back coaches and am not throwing opinion out there to be gospel. A lot of this information on this blog is opinion and not actually in tune with what's going on. So if me saying stating what I have is being a Little League Dad...than I guess I'll have to be labeled that be whoever feels that way. Get information correct and stay objective I what I would respond with. I don't think Jay and Tyrone are lying when we talk.

In reply to by MichiganMan14

Monocle Smile

April 17th, 2017 at 5:07 PM ^

You're doing a good job earning that label, so I'm not about to take anything you say very seriously. I have a low opinion of your honesty on this topic.  You're not being objective. You're carrying a torch and it's insanely obvious to a number of users.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 5:13 PM ^

No sir. You have yours and I have mine. I have not belittled anyone or any players. It is not uncommon on this board to conversely be be-littled for your opinion and I'm well aware. Your opinion of me matters not and I've staTed my issue with information being presented that was not factual. Like I said before, I've stayed out of the politics and will continue to as long as obvious attempts of marginalization are not made against players in manners I feel unjust. Don't talk about flag football and then graze an 81 yards 2 tds performance and top it off with comments of how it was largely against backup DT play. It was done behind a #2 Oline against the #1 front seven.

Monocle Smile

April 17th, 2017 at 5:17 PM ^

Have fun in Bolivia. No skin off my back. A shame to see you about to fall from being a respected insider to little more than a butthurt troll whose favorite player isn't lovingly caressed enough by the blog writers. All because you can't control your emotions.

The groupthink accusations and pretentious self-righteousness are the cherries on top.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 5:26 PM ^

Hey it is what it is. I haven't disrespected anybody. If I'm sent to Bolivia then the Lord of the Flies effect lives strong on this blog. I don't have to be here. Definitely don't have to win people over to justify my existence. If me saying what I feel without belittling results in mods banishing me then it is what it is.

In reply to by MichiganMan14

Reader71

April 18th, 2017 at 9:45 AM ^

I don't disagree with you. But you kind of represent Karan on this board, and he might not like someone taking your position publicly. I went through something like this myself -- my dad never realized that he had to stop being a fan and had to keep some opinions to himself or risk embarrassing me. Obviously, I don't know anything about you and your guy. But it's something you might want to think about.

In reply to by MichiganMan14

Magnus

April 18th, 2017 at 12:43 PM ^

You claim to be in tune with what's going on behind the scenes (and I believe that to be somewhat true), so can you answer this:

Why did Higdon get left in for the whole spring game while Chris Evans was yanked early? Harbaugh has tended to pull clear starters early, and he leaves in the other guys for more time in spring practices. If Higdon is equal to or above Evans, then I would assume he wouldn't have led the team(s) in touches.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 5:07 PM ^

Little league Dad. If that's your opinion of me is then that is fine. I called out factually incorrect information. I also speak to the people in the program to include the past and current running back coaches and am not throwing opinion out there to be gospel. A lot of this information on this blog is opinion and not actually in tune with what's going on. So if me saying stating what I have is being a Little League Dad...than I guess I'll have to be labeled that be whoever feels that way. Get information correct and stay objective Is what I would respond with. I don't think Jay and Tyrone are lying when we talk.

Trader Jack

April 17th, 2017 at 6:01 PM ^

I mean, you can just keep copy pasting the same quotes over and over but that's not addressing any of the points I made. What's funny is your opinion of things, that Chris and Karan are good players who will both get carries, is exactly the same one most of us have here. Including Brian. Your issue is the assumption that Evans will be the starter, tho? Or that Brian should've spent more time talking about Higdon instead of the harmless, enjoyable story about Evans coaching a youth team? It's such an odd hill for you to die on. You really think Brian has an agenda to marginalized Higdon? There's no way that's true. He's been on Karan's bandwagon since basically the beginning.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 6:39 PM ^

Nobody is dying. The comment about backup DTs and the running back race being conceded is directly contrary to a lengthy conversation that I just had with the RB Coach. That's my point. Watching the film and seeing Hurst in there on on of his TD runs simply makes my point that his work was not done on backups. That is all. I've kept it pretty simple. I haven't spoken of actual politics and goings on as its in house and not for blogs. This is all about a stated opinion. The write up is all about a back that did not make waves while 2 other backs scored 3 tds. Am I the only one that sees this? How is this not odd? Lol people are running to defend the OP when I've taken a simple front of defending kids who performed on Saturday and we're glossed over for details of flag football and assumptions of depth charts that are untrue per the damn RB Coach lol.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 6:44 PM ^

That being said....when a kid has 12 carries and scores twice with 81 yards I would expect to see actual brake down of what that kid did. Instead we were fed details of unrelated off field stuff and neither Karan or Ty's play was actually broken down. The running back position seems to be the only position that this was the case. I guess I'll just be crazy and "Little League Dad".

Franz Schubert

April 18th, 2017 at 7:25 PM ^

I agree that Higdon was marginalized in the write up. This board is a hive of followers and you should not expect objective posters. The blog has historically created overly contrived memes that get repeated to infinity, and the Evans coaching story is an attempt to create another. In other words, just don't bother pointing out anything that deviates from the narrative.

Magnus

April 18th, 2017 at 8:19 PM ^

It's a human element being injected into a sports story. Good writing is able to weave the two together.

I guess some of you people just want charts and stats, not words and thoughts.

Trader Jack

April 17th, 2017 at 9:16 PM ^

But the only reason Evans "did not make waves," as you said, is because he was taken out early... like the other presumed starters. Higdon will play and seems like a really good back. So does Evans. Chris is the presumed starter. The end.

It sounds like you expected Brian to be really impressed by Karan and were surprised and disappointed when you didn't see more written about his performance. That's fine. But nobody is marginalizing anybody. The RB group is just more of a known quantity than probably any other offensive position. Therefore, it didn't get as much coverage.

MichiganMan14

April 18th, 2017 at 11:17 AM ^

Mt point was very simple. Talk about the backs that were out there on the field and about what they did. Not flag football. If a kid....any kid scores 2 tds in a Spring Game it should be talked about. Peters has been talked about as he should. Why weren't the running backs broken down in similar fashion. This include Ty and Kareem. Painting me out like I'm LaVar Ball is the prerogative of the individual but what I'm actually doing is asking for uniformity and coverage of the actual play. Notoriety is fleeting anyway and not why kids play. Just would be nice to see the actual play talked about at the same length as flag football. If that's grounds for labeling me then fine. I stand by my points and also stand corejected about Hurst being in on some plays that actually saw Marshall in his place.

Gulogulo37

April 17th, 2017 at 10:40 PM ^

"Nobody is dying."

It's a metaphor...

Also, I just watched Higdon's first TD. Lawrence Marshall and Carl Myers are the DTs. Myers gets blasted out of there and Higdon runs through the wake. Since you're making the point of how this was against the 1st-team D, I'd just like to point out it's not. Good for Higdon for taking advantage of it, but it's not like that was Barry Sanders eluding 5 tackles. 

MichiganMan14

April 18th, 2017 at 11:11 AM ^

Our vantage points won't be the same. Not going to argue your opinion but I certainly do not share it. A long discussion with Wheatley has solidified my opinions on the matter.

bronxblue

April 17th, 2017 at 7:20 PM ^

You called it a political statement driven by an agenda. You seem to be literally the only person who took some benign comments as such. Higdon will be a good back this year, but he looks a lot like the good player he was last week. Evans, though, is a better receiver out of the backfield and looks capable of running through tackles a bit more. Everyone is going to see the field, but Evans is the leading returning rusher by a healthy margin and seems to have altered his style a bit. That's worth noting and discussing a bit. I doubt Brian meant any disrespect in doing so.

Rabbit21

April 17th, 2017 at 1:28 PM ^

I know you have a connection, but this feels like an over-reaction.  

Evans was pulled after only a few plays - fact.

Similar in fashion to how D. Smith got pulled out last year - fact

This is a pattern with established starters - fact.

Brian is relating how this should probably be interpreted, nothing else.

The write-up was complimentary of Higdon and I have yet to read a bad word on him or say how he won't play.  There's also the fact that running back depth isn't a question of particular interest to anyone, we know it's good, and the question of who starts isn't particularly interesting, given the rotational patterns at RB under this staff.  I am unsure how you got the impression of marginalization out of that.

 

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 1:43 PM ^

"Higdon and Isaac looked like Higdon and Isaac; both were the beneficiaries of the second-team DTs getting consistently gashed. I continue to like Higdon's combination of sharp cuts and low pad level and think he'll a productive #2."

Rabbit21

April 17th, 2017 at 1:51 PM ^

Ummm.....yeah.  Still not sure how that's marginalization.  It seems more complimentary of Higdon's playing style while acknowledging some things(such as mostly runnign against 2nd string DT's who had problems during the game) that may have skewed perception of the performance.  Again, with respect to the fact pattern I laid out, I am still not seeing how anything Brian wrote was inflammatory.  

Appreciate your story in regards to Higdon and very much appreciate the perspective you have brought to the board in terms of what is going on with the program and helping humanize a guy who seems to be an A+ person.  Right now it just feels like you're turning it up to 11 and that's not going to help your cause.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 4:33 PM ^

1. The assumption of Karan being a "productive #2" is wrong. 2. Pointing out bad 2nd string DT play ad why Karan was successfull is also wrong. Hurst is not a 2nd string and he is a beast. These two points are both subtle attempts at marginalization. I don't make stuff up and believe it or not try to be objective as possible. Never said one bad word about other backs. Karan is no #2 to Chris and after speaking with both Jay Harbaugh and Tyrone Wheatley at length this Saturday, this is very much a battle and there is much shuffling still the be done. So again, do not throw in this "productive #2/success against 2nd string DT stuff out there when it's not been decided or true respectively. If we want to talk extra curricular activity....then we would have to talk non-profits and community service work. Karan does a ton of that.

MI Expat NY

April 17th, 2017 at 5:44 PM ^

What does it matter?  Nobody expects Evans to be a 25 carries per game workhorse with nothing for the backups.  It'll probably be 15-18 for one back, 10 for another, and a handful for someone else.  I'd expect Evans to most often get the most carries, but there will probably be a game or two where Higdon is the lead back on the day.  

You seem to be hanging your hat on one comment about the DT play, while ignoring that the only substintatve comment about Higdon's play was very complimetnary.  I also don't see why you think the assumption that Evans is the leader at the moment is that offensive to you.  Evans seemed like he was "ahead" most of last season.  He was more productive the last few games of the season.  And his early pull from the spring game is indicative of being the first string guy.  None of that is definitive of what will be, and there's plenty of time for Higdon or someone else to establish himself as the lead back.  But at the same time, that seems to be what's true at the moment.  And that's ok!  

Magnus

April 18th, 2017 at 1:09 PM ^

"The assumption of Karan being a productive #2 is wrong."

What's wrong about it? Will Karan not be productive? Will he be the #1 back? There are only a couple things that could be wrong about this statement, and neither one of those things seems to be the case.

I guess Higdon could be an unproductive #1 back, but I doubt that's the direction you're taking this.

MichiganMan14

April 17th, 2017 at 1:58 PM ^

Along with Bush...Hudson...Kinnel...R. Johnson....Glasgow...R.Jones and a bunch of guys who will either be starting on defense playing a ton on defense this year. It's important to actually look at the film....or the OP paragraph would have you thinking the TDS were scored on players who weren't actually playing. This is why the marginalization is being called out. The actual TD and the personnel on the field during it is directly conflicting with the quoted synopsis. Hurst is not only a starter....he is a likely All-B1G defensive tackle so....about that quote again....

stephenrjking

April 17th, 2017 at 2:15 PM ^

There's a difference between analysis of one play (which Brian does not offer) and a look at the overall personnel makeup. And on that play (at the 50 second mark of the OP highlight film, for those curious) I see the offense attacking the opposite side of the line from Hurst, and... caving in guys not expected to be starters, like Reuben Jones. At any rate, the point about the backup DTs is that a lot of the yards picked up by Higdon and Isaac took place in a context that teaches us little about next year, since it doesn't resemble what they will face in real games this fall.

It was still a nice run for Higdon and if our OL gets to the point that it can cave in top level DLs like that he'll have those in real games. 

But you're missing the entire point. The purpose of the post isn't to evaluate every play; it's to give significant information that might not otherwise be available. And RB is easily the least questionable position on the team. Brian has concluded Evans is in line to be the starter; Higdon continues to be exactly what we expected, which is a good back who will contribute significantly this season, along with Isaac and probably Walker. We've known it would be a solid rotation since the moment the Orange Bowl ended. 

Since there isn't much newsy stuff out of RB, Brian didn't invest much analysis on it, looking instead at the suddenly interesting QB competition, the fleet of young receivers, the TEs, and of course the OL. Which is to say, literally every other spot on the field is less settled than RB.

So reporting that Higdon looked good and that he liked the way he runs is, um, not marginalization. Reading some sort of bias into this simply doesn't make sense.

You're making it personal and it doesn't need to be. You haven't shown inclination to this in the past, so I don't think this is a regular thing, but for whatever reason you're on the wrong track here. 

Magnus

April 18th, 2017 at 1:18 PM ^

Full summary of who was playing defense on Higdon's 10-yard TD:

Reuben Jones
Carl Myers
Lawrence Marshall
Carlo Kemp
Mike McCray*
Devin Bush, Jr.*
Khaleke Hudson*
Benjamin St-Juste
Keith Washington
Tyree Kinnel*
Jordan Glasgow

There were 4 presumed starters, and the entire defensive line was second-stringers or lower.

jakerblue

April 17th, 2017 at 2:06 PM ^

Pretty sure saying Higdon looked like Higdon, was more of a compliment than a dig. That there was nothing drastically different than what we've seen (which is a good thing, I'm pretty sure the consensus here is that he is a good RB).

Saying they were the beneficiaries of the second-team DTs is just saying that it's a spring game, and even if he ran well there isn't much to read into because it wasn't against the top guys.

ABOUBENADHEM

April 17th, 2017 at 2:54 PM ^

I like his downhill, quick cut style, which seems to me to be maturing, little by little. To me, he still seems to be running and thinking a bit vs. running more on instincts. That's not a criticism, more a comment on how much there is to learn. I am still confused by how often Higdon was called on last year to run wide when I don't think that is his strength. I too thought Higdon played well, as much as one can tell from stats from a quasi-real game and mixed rosters. I did not look much at Higdon's, nor anyone else's, performance in pass protection. My sense is that the RB's that get the most PT this year, will be those that can run AND protect the QB.