Spring Position Battles: Offense Comment Count

Brian

patrick-omameh-pensive The kids are in and the winter sports are slowly strangling whatever hopes you had, so the next major event you won't stare at a bottle of pills after is spring practice. Time for primers. Positions I'll be looking at hard in a month or two:

Left Tackle

The Departed

Fifth-year senior Mark Ortmann graduates. Ortmann was no Jake Long but by the end of his career at Michigan he was a solid pass protector and okay in the run game. If Michigan can get an equal performance from a freshman or sophomore that's a win.

The Candidates

The favorite is redshirt sophomore Patrick Omameh, who drew into the lineup late last year when David Molk went down with injury and the right guard spot became persistently unsettled after David Moosman slid over to center. Omameh made a few impressive plays downfield…

…and was generally functional. Though he ended up at guard last year that was an effort to get Michigan's best five linemen on the field more than anything else. Omameh has always been regarded a left tackle prospect.

Omameh's main competition will come from two redshirt freshman. Taylor Lewan was a late-blooming prospect from Arizona who got acres of hype—the Long comparisons were rife—and has an enormous ceiling. Omameh has experience on Lewan but if those two are far and away the top two candidates for starting jobs they might leave Omameh at guard and insert Lewan. Michael Schofield is another redshirt freshman who was well-regarded as a recruit and will have a shot at the job, but he may be better suited for right tackle.

Hoping for… Lewan. Jumping into the starting lineup as a freshman would be Long-like for a guy who has drawn Long comparisons, and it would presumably allow Omameh to slide over to right tackle to help lock down the area from which most of Tate Forcier's wild-ass scrambles were born.

Expecting… Omameh. With three starts to his name and no current starters a threat to move to left tackle, Omameh is a prohibitive favorite.

Right Guard

The Departed

The aforementioned Moosman was Michigan's most consistent offensive lineman the last two years when not forced to play center due to Molk's injuries. Though he was consistent, he wasn't great; his prominence says more about the state of Michigan's line the last couple years than his future in the game. He wasn't invited to the NFL combine.

Since Moosman spent most of the year at center and his replacement was a combination of Huyge, Ferrara, and Omameh with the latter performing the best, Michigan should expect improved production here.

The Candidates

john-ferrara-osu If Lewan or Schofield blows up, Omameh is the likely starter here… unless he gets shifted out to right tackle. But that's another spot.

Assuming the tackles are not in such surplus that Michigan can toss them about the interior line willy-nilly, Michigan faces a choice between old and young. The old guy in the mix is fifth-year senior John Ferrara (right), a guy who was flipped from defensive tackle in Rodriguez's first year at Michigan and saw spot starts in 2008. He was supplanted last year by a couple of guys who displayed serious limitations, but he's more seasoned than the other options.

The other options are a pair of highly-touted southerners. Redshirt sophomore Ricky Barnum decommitted from Florida just before signing day and was actually the second-team left tackle last year. The assumption here is that Omameh was more ready to play and left tackle was not open, so the best backup lineman practiced at the most available spot—right guard after Molk went down—and the second best practiced at the toughest. That would be Barnum. He came highly touted and after two years prepping he's the most likely guy. If it's close, Michigan will probably go with the younger player.

The other prime candidates are Elliot Mealer, who saw a little time last year as a backup, and redshirt freshman Quinton Washington. The soft-spoken Washington picked Michigan over South Carolina late in last year's recruiting cycle and drew lavish praise from the coaches:

"To my understanding, he's their number one lineman they are going after in the nation. That's point blank what coach Rodriguez told me Friday night."

Washington is a rare combination of size and linebacker-erasing agility and could be a major star. His ceiling is very, very high. If he doesn't win a job this year he will be the heavy favorite to replace Steve Schilling in 2011.

Hoping for… Realistically, Barnum. He should be ahead of Washington at this point and Washington getting the nod over him would probably say more bad things about Barnum than good things about Washington. In fairy land where Michigan embarks on a four-year journey with Lewan as Jake Long 2.0 and Washington as Steve Hutchinson 2.0, Washington. No offense to Ferrara, but I'd take a starting spot for him as a very bad sign.

Expecting… Barnum.

mark-huyge-penn-state Right Tackle

The Departed

No one. Whoever's here this fall should be better, whether it's the same players with more experience or someone displacing them.

The Candidates

The reason this position is listed prominently is performance of the two semi-incumbents. Perry Dorrestein and Mark Huyge (right, holding the hell out of a Penn State lineman) were functional in the run game but revolving doors in pass protection. A not so random protection metric from last year:

PROTECTION METRIC: 14/29. Huyge –5, Schilling –3, Minor –2, Ortmann –1, Shaw –1, Koger –1, Moosman –1, Omameh –1.

That is by far the lowest percentage in UFR history. The culprits are the usual by now: Huyge on the edge, Schilling getting blasted back into the pocket, and several other folk having individual moments of struggle.

That happened to be a game that Huyge played right tackle; when Dorrestein got the start he was the guy leading the way with big minuses.

Michigan had little choice but to rotate those two last year. This year they have options. The aforementioned Lewan and Schofield come off redshirt years; Omameh will probably move back to tackle in spring, too. All these guys have been talked about already.

Hoping for… in the scenario where Lewan erupts, Omameh.

Expecting… early, a rotation similar to last year's. Huyge takes over late and his pass protection remains a major issue.

Tailback

The Departed

Brandon Minor and Carlos Brown were polar opposites in many ways but shared a knack for getting injured constantly. Despite having not one but two senior tailbacks, Michigan was forced to go to true freshman Vincent Smith late last year as both veterans looked on dourly from the sidelines holding various aching extremities.

Kevin Grady is also gone, though he was mostly a fullback last year.

Production should be about even; Brown and Minor were hardly at full speed last year.

The Candidates

They are diverse and sundry. With Vincent Smith out until fall with an ACL tear, five or six players will battle for carries. Mike Shaw is the one you've seen before. His freshman year was exciting, but his promise dipped as a sophomore. Shaw runs wildly. He's a zippy guy with the occasional fantastic move…

…but his vision is lacking and he's had fumble issues. This spring will be a turning point in his career. If he gets left in the wash by freshmen he's headed for kickoff return duties and not much else. Chances are he improves enough to be a part of the rotation; he has Brown-level speed.

Other folk are murkier. Mike Cox displayed impressive balance on a couple of garbage-time carries against weak opponents but has done nothing else so far and fell behind Smith almost as soon as he hit the practice field. He could find use as a short-yardage back or Soul Train extra. Cox is the only other player in the spring tailback derby to have seen a carry at Michigan.

The other three players are freshmen, be they redshirt or true. Fitzgerald Toussaint, the redshirt, is the most likely to have a breakout spring. He enrolled in fall—Smith got in early, giving us an early glimpse—and then broke his collarbone. That forced him out of a month of practice and relegated him to scout team duties, but before that he was a jump-cut maniac at Youngstown Liberty who racked up three or four 50+ yard touchdowns per game. When I profiled Toussaint prior to his enrollment, I was higher on him than Smith:

While I think Vincent Smith can be a good back in the Michigan offense, Toussaint has the bigger recruiting rep, better track numbers, and heart-stopping highlights; my bet is that he's the most successful tailback out of this class. I love the combination of moves, zone suitability, and flat-out speed cited by ESPN and demonstrated at track meets and football games.

And while Smith has outpaced even this site's positive take on him in year one, the main thing I'll be looking for this spring is Toussaint translating his sprinter's speed and audacious cuts to Michigan Stadium.

True freshmen Austin White and Stephen Hopkins have enrolled early and will get their shots as well. White is a slot/tailback who might be reminiscent of a Dorrell Jalloh or Darius Reynaud; he comes with less hype than Toussaint and I assume he will redshirt. Hopkins is the lowest-rated back of anyone on the roster but at 6-foot and 230-240 pounds there is a distinctly vacant role on the roster he might be the man to fill. Michigan needs a short-yardage moose.

Hoping for… Smith's healthy return and Toussaint living up to his crazy film.

Expecting… pretty much that, with Shaw factoring in as needed.

Others

My assumption remains that Devin Gardner is headed for a redshirt. Still, getting a look at the future of Michigan's quarterback position will be a priority for many. Roy Roundtree and Martavious Odoms have a stranglehold on slot receiver, but an extended look at Jeremy Gallon with an eye towards "please God, send us a punt returner" will be welcome. On the outside, Junior Hemingway is a lock and it will take some doing to displace Darryl Stonum. With Ricardo Miller, Jeremy Jackson, and Jerald Robinson all in early there's a chance someone displays an ability to adjust to deep balls.

Finally, I wonder if any of the tight ends can catch now.

Comments

mgovictors23

February 9th, 2010 at 4:18 PM ^

The position I'm most excited about by far is offensive line. It seems like we finally have talented options to work with at last and it will be interesting to see how the young guys do in the spring.

Jivas

February 9th, 2010 at 4:50 PM ^

He was a top-100 player last year, correct? And he's primarily an outside receiver? I have to imagine he'll push Stonum more than the incoming freshmen will.

mgopat

February 9th, 2010 at 5:07 PM ^

Great analysis. I think you're being a little bearish on Mike Shaw (I think he could be the next Steve Slaton if he puts it all together) but on the whole this is some great discussion for a snowy February.

Mountaineers Fanatic

February 9th, 2010 at 5:41 PM ^

For me, the OL will definately be where most of the exciting competition lies. The right side of the OL, especially the RT killed drives all too often last year. I expect the OL to get a lot better this year as guys mature and get another year under their belt. If the OL can improve like I think they can, I expect big things from this offense. Another spot that will be interesting will be QB. Well, maybe not so much the QB position, but the QB players. I have no doubts the coaches want to redshirt Gardner so I will leave him out of this discussion. My interest is in DRob. He is too good to sit on the sidelines. I like the way RR used him against OSU and I expect to see a lot more of it this year. I'm thinking two years from now, Tate and Devin will fight it out for starting QB and DRob will move to another position. RB will be interesting simply because the two starting RBs last year were injured every game. I think it will come down to two main RBs and whichever is having the better day will get the most carries

sharkhunter

February 9th, 2010 at 5:48 PM ^

how good is it to evaluate starters? Seems like Oline and Dline play at 50-75%. Can't sack QB. I remember seeing the lines standing up and engaging in school yard type pushing. Maybe it is good to avoid injuries but hard to evaluate linemen.

SysMark

February 9th, 2010 at 6:00 PM ^

If nothing else it is nice to read through this and realize RR's first recruits are ending redshirts and the roster is starting to fill up with quality depth, if still lacking some experience. This year could be a real turnaround.

mendrygal

February 9th, 2010 at 6:08 PM ^

I just read Chengelis' Detroit News article(that paper's ok to read, right?) talking about how DG enrolled late and is in a dorm room with a non-athlete. Is there anyway you guys up there can track this dude down and get him on this site so we can make sure DG's getting his rest, eating well, watching film, all that stuff? Plus we can referee roommate issues, like setting limits on phone calls at night, and volume limits for his(the roommate's)stereo and stuff. DG's comment was he doesn't know if his roommate knows who he is yet. I'm anxiously waiting for someone creative on this site to make an Odd Couple YouTube video of the 2 of them.

leftrare

February 9th, 2010 at 6:19 PM ^

Brian's discussion of OLs by position was, by the nature of the task, thick with contingencies to the point where neither he nor we come away with much clarity. What if we were to list the entire platoon in rank order of the number of snaps we'd see them taking? I'll try: 1. Schilling 2. Molk 3. Omameh 4. Hugye 5. Barnum Actually, a full complement of tackles, guards and center. Next, from the bench: 6. Washington 7. Ferrara 8. Lewan 9. Dorrestien 10. Schofield 11. Khoury 12. Mealer What's great about this is the number 12, as opposed to 6 in 2008. I can't see how the unit won't be substantially better than 2009, even after subtracting two starters. This group of players gets no more or less hype in places like this then squads in the past. Remember those great back-to-back classes of Mitchell, Ciulla, Gallimore, Dibenidictus, then Moosman, Ortmann, Zirbel, Schifano, McAvoy? The OL was stacked, we thought. But, not one of those guys was(or will be) drafted. The 2 star Reuben Riley, with a club on one hand, beat out some of those guys and later, Ferrara, a DT filled in after their departure. Dann O'Niell was the prototypical Debord-Moeller lineman. He's gone because he didn't or didn't want to fit the system. I think this may be the year when the "system" guys retained by the staff will be put to the test and I can't wait to see RR & co proven right.

switch26

February 9th, 2010 at 8:41 PM ^

can't wait to see fitz toussaint, hopefully there is a lot of improvement to be seen. I hope denard improves significantly by UCONN

Jon Benke

February 9th, 2010 at 11:03 PM ^

Denard Robinson be the backup QB. First of all, Tate won't take every snap of every game, win or lose, so we'll need someone that can take those reps, and that's Denard. If all goes well, next year, when Tate is a junior, Devin Gardner and Conelius Jones are red-shirt freshmen, and you want to move DR into a different role, so be it. But for this year, I think we need DR at QB, and only QB.

Jon Benke

February 9th, 2010 at 11:13 PM ^

The better the line, the better the offense, which means more wins for Michigan. So while it's nice to get our hopes up, it's hard to lean on young linemen to make an impact. That said, I don't think it's improbable that a combination of; Taylor Lewan, Patrick Omameh, Quinton Washington, Michael Schofield, and/or Ricky Barnum makes such an impact. The nice thing is, while all nice recruits, and we have heard positive rumblings of each, it's easier to have hopes of a group of five than just one or two. Best case is that two of these guys grab a strangle hold onto their respective positions, while the rest add depth to what should be a pretty good line. I really like that depth.

trueblueintexas

February 9th, 2010 at 11:34 PM ^

I'm surprised Brian did not propose a starting line of Huyge, Schilling, Molk, Omameh, Dorrestein. That line up combines the most overall starts/experience of everyone on the roster. I know Omameh was originally projected as a LT but I thought he played fairly well at RG and I would suggest the line is thinner in the interior than at the tackles and needs him there more. Especially if Molk is not fully recovered. O-line more than any position except QB is about development and maturation. I will not be surprised if either one or both of Huyge and Dorrestein steps up this year.

trueblueintexas

February 9th, 2010 at 11:44 PM ^

No position on the field has more potential to make plays than the quarterback. I could easily see Coach Rod using Tate 70% of the time and using D-Rob 30% of the time. That would garauntee getting the ball in D-Rob's hands more than any other position every game while giving Tate the consistency needed to be the starting QB. I can only assume with a full year under his belt, D-Rob will have progressed enough in his development (as well as the guys around him) to where he can truly be a dual threat when in the game.

bigbluetrue

February 10th, 2010 at 2:32 AM ^

for basically saying the same thing RR said a few days ago. It's a little less field time than what dmozz was envisioning but RR did address it. From Freep • Denard Robinson is staying at quarterback but needs to be on the field, too, which was difficult last year with Forcier starting. Coaches haven’t talked about him returning kicks, but that might be a possibility. “Denard’s a competitive guy, as you all know,” Rodriguez said. “He just wants to play. He’s a quarterback, and we’re going to keep him at quarterback, but the nice part is once you learn quarterback, you’re going to know every other position on offense. So it’s easy to say both (Forcier and Robinson) go in there at some times.” Printer link from Freep. http://www.freep.com/print/article/20100204/BLOG14/100204035/Rich-Rodri… Also from AA.com Rodriguez said there are no plans to move Robinson from quarterback, but conceded “he’s too good of an athlete just to stand if he’s not playing all the time at quarterback.” “I think the 15 practices in the spring will help immensely because it’s slowed down,” Rodriguez said. Enough that he could help in the return game or on defense? “Well, not on defense, but certainly - I haven’t talked to him about it, we haven’t talked really much about anything until we get in spring practice, but whether he does some returns and all that, he’ll probably be open to it,” Rodriguez said. “Denard’s a very competitive guy. You all know him, he just wants to play. But again, he’s a quarterback and we’re going to keep him at quarterback.” http://www.annarbor.com/sports/um-football/devin-gardner-conelius-jones…

cjpops

February 10th, 2010 at 9:33 AM ^

However, this frightened me: "his (Shaw) vision is lacking and he's had fumble issues. This spring will be a turning point in his career. If he gets left in the wash by freshmen he's headed for kickoff return duties and not much else." I hope that we can keep the fumbling to a minimum, especially on kick returns. Could be flashbacks to RR's first year, but, there seem to be a lot of mistakes on returns by UM. It will be interesting to see what (and who) materializes/develops on offense in the Spring. More importantly, perhaps, is to see how much improvement on defense UM can make. That's the key, IMHO.

saveferris

February 10th, 2010 at 12:46 PM ^

Who projects to back up Molk at center if Angry Michigan Center-Hating God strikes again (please....no)? With Moosman gone and Pace a true freshman, which lineman do we keep in the "In Case of Emergency - Break Glass" box?