Sports Blog Heisman: With Bias! Comment Count

Brian

The is a sports blog version of the Heisman again, which I'm participating in because goddammit Ndamukong Suh needs something.

3. CJ Spiller, Clemson

I followed Spiller's recruitment as Michigan was briefly involved because Spiller's apparently one and only criteria for choosing a school was immediate playing time. This eventually sent him to Clemson in a shock upset over local favorite Florida State.

Spiller immediately proved that his criteria were silly. Here is a list of schools at which CJ Spiller would not have found immediate playing time:

  •  

The end. Clemson over the last few years has been intermittent top-ten brilliance from Spiller interspersed with the overwhelming Clemson-ness of the whole thing. Why Spiller instead of Ingram or Gerhart? Spiller was also a special teams destroyer—a preposterous five return touchdowns on the year—and threat in the passing game. Those guys are both close; I tend to value guys who regularly turn in huge plays over those who grind out gains by running over opponents.

2. Brandon Graham, Michigan

Okay, okay, since this is the only vote I'm sure Graham will receive this is by definition a homer vote, but I did watch every snap of his year about four times and have done so with NFL beast Lamarr Woodley, too, and Graham graded out better than Woodley despite being the only player on the defense more intimidating than a six-year-old girl.

He hits harder than Glen Winston:

He did this a lot:

A lot:

Seriously, lots:

On that last one he turned Brian Bulaga, projected first rounder, into horsemeat.

He's the most impressive defensive lineman I've seen since…

1. Ndamukong Suh, DT, Nebraska

Last weekend. This award shouldn't be about stats, it should be about the most ridiculously good player to play college football in any given year. But if it is about stats, uh… 82 tackles (leading the team), 25 TFLs, 12 sacks, and ten(!!!) PBUs from a defensive tackle. I had this crazy idea to promote Brandon Graham for the Heisman that I dropped about a quarter into the Big 12 championship game. Tim's got a whole diary on this, though he's way harsh on Rittenberg IME. I'm going to be so pissed when Suh comes in second because 10% of the voters turned in their ballots before the games were over.

Comments

Don

December 11th, 2009 at 12:47 PM ^

at any level of football. How else can you describe an award purportedly for the best player when 50% of the players are automatically removed from consideration at the outset? That's why Charles Woodson is the only truly deserving recipient of the award since players stopped playing both ways.

Northern Fan

December 11th, 2009 at 2:01 PM ^

Agree with you. I changed the channel to the awful ESPN presentation of the college football awards last night. Every year they spread the awards around to all the players, no surprise!! Then I see that they give Suh three awards and he steals the show in some aspects. Isn't that what the Hesiman is about? McCoy wins best quarterback Gerhart wins best running back Suh wins 3,4 or 5 awards couldn't keep count Set us up for Ingram as your heisman trophy winner. SUCKS!! SUH baby!

aawolve

December 11th, 2009 at 1:07 PM ^

As you all know, Pryor is a tough mother to take down one on one in the backfied, but Graham broke down and made a really nice play. I really look forward to following his NFL career, he's one of my all-time favorites, maybe #1.

blueloosh

December 11th, 2009 at 1:26 PM ^

Love the post. If you were any less of a genius though I would have made a comment about the use of criteria/criterion (in a less backhanded way than I just did).

Hannibal.

December 11th, 2009 at 1:30 PM ^

Ingram has a signifcantly higher ypc than Gerhart and Spiller and he played against much tougher defenses than either one of them. I doubt that Suh will come close to winning it. Most people never saw him until the Big 12 title game since Nebraska didn't play in any really big games until then and a big portion of Big 12 country will vote for McCoy. This will be the ultimate "plurality Heisman". I think Ingram has the best shot at it.

Callahan

December 11th, 2009 at 1:44 PM ^

I'm going to be so pissed when Suh comes in second because 10% of the voters turned in their ballots before the games were over.
Or the other voters who submitted their votes after the SEC Championship game.

Callahan

December 11th, 2009 at 2:25 PM ^

Good question. I'm not sure if regional bias is so prevalent anymore because of the national TV packages and multiple ESPN channels for everyone but the Pac-10 makes it so that everyone can see virtually all SEC/Big Ten/Big East/Big XII games. Not to say that sports writers don't vote for the local guy. Drew Sharp voted Dan Lefebvre third behind Ingram and CJ Spiller, or so he says. (That's almost as egregious as Joe Falls voting Buddy Bell for AL Manager of the Year in 1996 when the Tigers lost over 100 games). It happens, but I don't think it's as widespread as it used to be.

jg2112

December 11th, 2009 at 2:28 PM ^

The saddest thing about the Winston video clip is hearing Wayne Larivee say "The All America junior from Detroit, Michigan" and unfortunately realizing Larivee was wrong because Graham is a senior.

wiscwood

December 11th, 2009 at 2:35 PM ^

Today is my 49th birthday! I want a BCS bowl, an undefeated team, and oh yeah a Heisman Trophy winner on my team playing for the National Championship. In 1997 I got my wish. I'll get it soon, I can wait. To heck with Brian Kelly!!! Stay Up! This is the time of the True Blue Bloods!! GO BLUE!!!

michfan4borw

December 11th, 2009 at 3:59 PM ^

Assuming an NFL team selects Graham early for the NFL, does anyone think that recruits will recognize the positive effects that RR's staff had on BG's development? I'm concerned that our team isn't getting enough top D-line recruits to commit to our program. While coaches of other programs might point out that BG was a Carr guy, I hope that recruits notice the development of BG under RR and Barwis. For more evidence, one only needs to look at what a beast Mike Martin continues to develop into. First time posting here, but I've visited many times. Thanks to Brian for giving me a place to go now that I no longer go to the free press or to annarbor.com (terrible journalism at both sites).

jamiemac

December 11th, 2009 at 4:14 PM ^

I'm fine with any ballot that has Suh, Gerhardt and Spiller as 1-2-3 in any order. They were the three most dominant and exciting players for the season. It's not their fault they played on flawed teams. Its a questionable award process, for sure, that even takes more credibility hits, IMHE, if Tobow, McCoy or Ingram wins. But, I will give Brian a major league pass for putting Brandon on his mock ballot. Again, it aint his fault he plays on a flawed team.

wiscwood

December 11th, 2009 at 5:07 PM ^

Michigan Football is not doing well. The Heisman is a joke when Michigan doesn't win it. When Michigan players wins the Heisman it is awesome. I can not say certain awards "suck" because at this point for me food isn't as good when Michigan is bad. Right now the Michigan Nation is angry and jaded. Life will have meaning again when awards will be won by Wolverines. I just can't fall in despair because Michigan has fallen on rough times. Michigan will be great again for sure. I think what I hate the most is that Buckeyes are in football nirvana. Beating Michigan is their only love in life. They also think that they have overcome the overall games in the series. I hate those guys! I hate the Badgers too.

dakotapalm

December 11th, 2009 at 5:48 PM ^

Spiller is VERY good and VERY talented: but the best defenses against whom he played almost entirely shut him down. TCU and South Carolina gave up very little, opening KO vs. USC excepted.

readyourguard

December 11th, 2009 at 11:16 PM ^

I ran that clip about a dozen times, starting it just before the moment of impact. What an incredible collision. Beautiful stuff. And then, in the 2nd clip, I watched quintessential Mouton. He runs lateral to the line of scrimmage. That's just back football technique....at ANY level.