In Soviet Unverified Voracity, Otter Eats Crocodile Comment Count

Brian

BASKETBALL. This is Henri The Otter Of Ennui's brother, Hank The Otter Of Swank. He's trying to eat a crocodile.

large[1]

He has been watching Michigan basketball and is feeling rather metal. \m/

Don't drink? Grantland's Andrew Sharp profiles Nik Stauskas, and, uh…

Shooter. Shooter shooter shooter shooter shooter shooter. His ballhandling has made him a more complete scorer this year, but let’s not kid ourselves. That Wayne song was all about Stauskas.

This feels like meme backlash. Yes, Stauskas is nasty whenever provided an opportunity to launch, and sometimes even when not provided one.

But he has an almost 50/50 split between twos and threes and Michigan's highest FT rate by a wide margin. Shooter-shooter-shooter shooters have profiles more like Zak Irvin's 1:3 ratio of twos to threes and 21 FTAs on the season. Oh, and they're not top ten in the Big Ten in assists.

So… no, Andrew Sharp. No.

But kinda yeah. HAHAHAHA

image_thumb36[1]

The main problem with this chart is it doesn't seem to give full credit to the shot right before the half, which was launched from Botswana.

Down goes a guy considerably worse than Frazier! Nevermind that business about Michigan's relative immobility as a three. After Duke and Syracuse losses to Wake Forest and Georgia Tech, respectively, the door is wide open for Michigan to move up to a 2. Also helping is Nebrasketball, which moved into the top 50 in RPI with a win over Indiana. That provides Michigan a couple extra wins in that overvalued category.

Michigan's still definitively behind three teams (Florida, Wichita, Arizona) but they've got a shot at everyone else. They are behind another five or six outfits and thus can't hit that 1 spot without a miracle, but two is at least a 50/50 proposition with Duke ceding advantage with a horrible loss.

In RPI terms the relative equality in record is because of an easier schedule. Duke is 4-4 against RPI top 50; Michigan is 8-5, 10-5 as long as Nebraska sticks. Duke also has one additional bad loss after tonight and zero road pedigree. Michigan is 7-2 on the road in the Big Ten. Beat an Indiana team that may be without Noah Vonleh and has definitely exited the bubble picture and I'm guessing a semifinal exit in the BTT will be good enough for a two.

Foot… ball? SB Nation takes an in-depth look at what Doug Nussmeier will do differently than Al Borges. This passage reinforces just how bonkers Michigan's approach was last year:

For example, the Michigan offense involved six primary run schemes: power, iso, draw, horn (a tackle lead play), inside zone, and outside zone. It's worth noting here, just for comparison, that NFL run-game guru Alex Gibbs believes that a ground attack should be built almost entirely on just inside and outside zone.

"Horn" was a little-used counter on which Michigan's tackles struggled to execute because of a lack of experience. The tackles struggled to execute. You know, the good, veteran dudes.

HOORAY

The run game will likely be built around inside zone and remain committed to the concept from week to week. Whereas Borges would build a million different constraints and play calls around multiple different run and pass schemes, Nussmeier will run inside zone in multiple ways, from multiple formations, and with different constraints built off of it to counter defensive responses. At Alabama, players would rep inside zone against every single defensive look that might come up, ensuring it could be called against any opponent.

Hooray.

Brutal. Tom Seeberg, father of Lizzie, speaks on his daughter's death. After issues here this is compelling:

"I think the context of revealing his name maybe adds to maybe why we certainly accused Notre Dame of conducting a superficial investigation," Seeberg said Tuesday on WGWG-FM 87.7. "But maybe it adds context to why they might conduct a superficial investigation. In a he-said-she-said matter, you can quickly gather forensic evidence to try to determine what happened there, or you can let it linger like they did. Let evidence spoil."

Please read the whole item; it's a fair piece for one that comes from father of deceased person who may or may not have been assaulted by a Notre Dame football player. It may have taken a while, but at least Michigan took what action was available to it—ex post facto or not—in its situation. Some of the things Seeberg's father states apparently sans emotion are crippling.

This is the point where it's really easy to fall into either THEY ARE TERRIBLE homerism or I AM OUTRAGED signaling; I'm not trying to do either and the Chicago Tribune does a terrific job of not doing so either while still allowing the to-date mysterious story from the Seebergs to come forth.

Walton profiled. Derrick Walton on The Journey, which remains a disappointingly but understandably whitewashed version of life in the Big Ten:

Damn if they don't get some remarkable video, though. That shot through Trey Burke to Beilein against Kansas… damn.

Well then, do something about it. Mark Cuban's NCAA rant has been disassembled various places, and deservedly. Cuban asserts that the one-and-done rule is somehow the NCAA's deal, and things go downhill from there. He also asserts that people would be better off if the D-League was a real alternative, which it won't ever be because the NBA would rather take the marketing bonanza that is the NCAA tournament and apply it instead of trying to make the Fort Wayne Mad Antz relevant nationally.

There is a solution here. It's easy, actually: the NBA moves to an NHL-style draft where any relevant player is automatically inserted at 18. This preserves their eligibility. The NBA then allows teams to sign draftees but forces them to guarantee contracts one year longer than their eligibility would last (IE, signing a guy out of HS: five year contract, freshman 4 years, etc) except in the case of graduating seniors, who are owed nothing.

If there's a five-round draft, say, that

  • increases NCAA popularity as NBA fans check out their prospects,
  • reduces bad NBA contracts for unready or plain overrated prospects,
  • encourages the NBA to sign guys when they're ready and only then,
  • allows LeBron-type prospects to immediately hit the NBA like they deserve to.

That is a vast improvement on the current system and 1000% more fun than anything Mark Cuban's come up with.

Here's an interesting metric. Bill Connelly has a novel stat: solo tackle rate for offenses. The teams at the top of this ranking correspond closely to spreads: Kansas State, Texas Tech, Arizona State, Baylor, Indiana. Michigan was middle of the pack; MSU and ND towards the bottom. Meaningful? No idea.

Etc.: Nebraska is one win over Wisconsin from punching their NCAA dance ticket. Viva Nebrasketball! Everything you need to know about that one incredible Iowa cheerleader. His name is Oz! Jim Delany is just the worst. Football is  faster than ever now, for a given version of "now" that includes 1968.

Michigan is included as part of a scouting report series on "second-tier" contenders; nothing in it you don't already know except that Michigan apparently struggles against teams that push tempo. Um?

Comments

maznblu

March 6th, 2014 at 5:53 PM ^

I wonder if Connelly's solo tackle rate helps explain why the extreme spread teams have generally good records and pile up yardage, but sometimes struggle to win against high-quality opponents.

Spreading the defense out leads to more solo tackles.  If your team has a talent advantage, then your playmaker is trying to make a less talented player make the tackle.  Win.

However, if the opposing player is equally talented, if not more, then they make the tackle.  Lose.

It seems that it would follow that spread teams can sometimes have only one really talented player on offense and have a good bit of success (see Robinson, Denard) because they can win more of those one-on-one battles.  But maybe the schematic advantages shrink when up against a quality opponent?  In the end, does it mostly just come down to overall talent (The Team, The Team, The Team)?

GRFS11

March 6th, 2014 at 7:02 PM ^

Interesting idea on the NBA draft.  I wonder, though, how would the NBA/NCAA handle kids that are drafted at 18, come back for a few years of college ball, and then "re-enter" the draft (as they are able to do in hockey)?  

Magnum P.I.

March 6th, 2014 at 7:42 PM ^

I'm convinced that the schizophrenic complexity of our offense last season was about three-quarters of the explanation for our abhorrent line play. I expect our line to be better this year, even without Lewan and Schofield.

Fired Borges.

Roc Blue in the Lou

March 6th, 2014 at 9:57 PM ^

APPLAUSE, APPLAUSE on the SB Nation piece regarding Nuss and finding his "one thing"...i mentioned a month ago my incredulity when BigAl pulled out his 2 point masterpiece in the Bowl Game...something the tv commentators mentioned as being so creative that we would be seeing that copied by other teams.  I remembered then thinking:  how could we have spent soooo much time prepping that one psychadelic play when our entire running game was in shambles????  Jack Palance explained it best:  the secret to life is "One thing.  Just one thing.  You stick to that and everything else don't mean shit."  Don't be no city slicker, Nuss!

Mpfnfu Ford

March 6th, 2014 at 10:34 PM ^

They're competitors, in a way that NCAAFB and NFL are legally not allowed to be. The NFL's antitrust exemption is contingent on them not competiting head to head on Saturdays and Fridays with CFB and HSFB. So the NFL can put in rules that help the college game and strengthen it.

But NBA and NCAA don't have that kind of relationship, and often have games on at the same time competiting with one another for ratings. Hence why the NBA has spent the last 20 years undermining and (successfully) harming college basketball. They're never going to do anything that helps college basketball unless it's an overwhelmingly positive thing for the NBA, and even then, they're more likely to continue undermining.

west2

March 7th, 2014 at 9:13 AM ^

are cute little weasel like animals seen in Disney movies aren't they? 6 foot carnivorous croc eating mutants? Another sign that the apocalypse is upon us. Question: if Stauskas was a college football player-he would be?