What an awesome start. I could watch those highlights over and over and cackle with glee. I think I will again.
This is maaaaybe premature there, ESPN. Maryland #1 FWIW.
9/4/2010 – Michigan 30, UConn 10 – 1-0
First there were those two years of almost unrelenting misery. Then there was this offseason, the third consecutive in which seemingly every week saw another stomach-churning burst of negative publicity for things that don't matter very much individually but aggregate like nanorobots gone awry. Then there was all that sitting in the stadium as described on Saturday, envisioning different ways the future could play out, giving each a letter grade and having no grasp of which were likelier than others. Then there was Keith Jackson and a ribbon-cutting and a flyover and fireworks (Amurrica!). Then there was this:
There was a brief moment where I discreetly wiped my eyes and hoped no one was looking, and then there was another flyover.
By the coin toss I was bobbing up and down on an imaginary pogo stick, trying to do anything with the energy that threatened to shut my brain off. I was hyped up, yo. The only thing I can remember like it was Football Armageddon. It's probably for the best that I didn't have anything handy to headbutt.
I had no idea what was going to happen, but there were grades for all of it.
A+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. Would watch again.
What was it like for Auburn fans the first time they saw Bo Jackson? For Georgia fans when they saw Herschel Walker? Was it like that?
I can't recall anything similar in the Michigan canon. Braylon had 80 yards against Washington, Hart 124 against San Diego State. Breaston touched the ball eight times. Manningham did once. I'm too young to remember Wheatley's debut. Defensive players are too infrequently involved, and their jobs too arcane, to have the same obvious impact. Receivers, too—even a stellar debut will see the guy touch the ball maybe ten times. It's an accomplishment for quarterbacks when their first starts don't end in flaming disaster.
It's only at running back that you can unearth some guy three standard deviations above the norm at various forms of moving, put him on the field, and give everyone the epiphany of awesome.
But even the debut of one of those Godzilla running backs doesn't compare because Denard Robinson had a Godzilla tailback debut and was one late fourth down conversion away from setting a Michigan Stadium record for completion percentage. Last year he was so clueless he couldn't run the offense, so transparently not a quarterback he went 14 of 31 with four interceptions on the season and played wide receiver against Ohio State.
So I think this might be literally true: Denard Robinson's performance against UConn was the greatest leap from one game to the next in Michigan history. Possibly college football history. He went from a guy who could not run the offense or throw the ball to one of the greatest statistical achievements* in the history of the program.
Nothing, not even the ludicrous fever dreams on message boards that rivals fans point at and laugh, could keep pace. Expectation was left in the dust by the end of the first quarter. The reasonable best case scenario fell away on the first drive of the second half when Robinson whipped a ball over the middle for sixteen yards on third and eleven. The possibility this was all a dream gave it up on Michigan's final drive when Robinson rolled out and lofted a touch pass to Kevin Koger. Not even fever dreams have that kind of audacity.
By the end, all that was left was reality, as unrecognizable as it is. Rival fans are reduced to stammering "buh-buh-but he'll get injured" in the hopes that will happen before Robinson gets a crack at their defense; 7-5 seems… eh… doable. After last year everyone's fighting to keep their hopes in check; this is proving very difficult indeed.
I kept biting myself in the second quarter, just to check about the fever dream bit. You build all this up in your mind before the season, think about the way things can go, say "Anything can happen, and the wait is over," and then find out you didn't really believe it. This was not part of the anything after all the months leading up to the pogo stick moment a minute before kickoff.
Because at some point around five minutes left, the energy drained out of the stadium. When Edsall called a timeout to get the ball back it was irritating and people booed. With a minute and a half left, I thought about the cold and what I should eat. I was bored, and thanks to that now I can't stand how far away next Saturday is.
*(313 against Ohio State still wins, I think, but it's hard to come up with anything else.)
PREBULLET SECTION OF REASSURANCE! Repeat after me: this was not last year's Notre Dame game.
A quick list of downers:
And now that we're done with that:
Unfortunately, I think that might be an artifact of the jam-packed dedication festivities. There's no time for that old time rock 'n' roll when you're running down the top five plays in Michigan Stadium history (which by the way: no Wangler to Carter? WTF, internet?), introducing a bunch of program icons and Greg Mathews, and so forth and so on. Unless they continue to fill those gaps with stuff, Lose Yourself threatens a return. They should just pick a top five list every week: top five catches. Top five runs. Interceptions, fumbles, comebacks, etc.
AnnArbor.com photo gallery. Ring of terror. Denard as QB EAGLES. The HSR takes a look at some stats. MVictors has some extra stadium details and bullet points on the goings-on, plus an outstanding SNL reference:
My Q&A session would have gone something like this:
Me: “Do you remember when…umm, Denard ran up and down the field a bunch of times?”
Rich Rod: “Yes.”
Me: “That was so cool.”
The B-25 Mitchell bomber that flew over Michigan Stadium Saturday as a part of the rededication ceremonies was a similar model to the one flown over Tokyo by the Doolittle Raiders. The Doolittle Raid was an audacious plan by an unconventional man who felt a strong sense that, in the wake of Pearl Harbor, America had to do something to strike at the heart of the Empire of Japan, so what better than to design a crazy, shouldn't work on paper, never been tested plan that would break the Japanese of their long-held belief of invincibility, and boost American morale...
If it worked.
Braves and Birds is thrilled he's not the only one anymore. Denard is apparently a P-38 Lightning.
Every offensive snap? Every offensive snap:
In UConn's only chance to showcase itself against a name-brand non-Big East opponent this year, the Huskies looked more like one of Michigan's typical September MAC cupcake opponents.
The good: UConn will never have to play against Denard Robinson again, and thank God for that. A few weeks ago I drew the ire of Michigan fans by saying I felt the Huskies had more talent than the Wolverines. Clearly, I was wrong. After yesterday, I'd say that on-balance, for every position but quarterback, the teams are pretty equal, maybe with Michigan grabbing a slight edge. But holy hell what a difference that quarterback makes. Video I had seen of Robinson didn't even come close to doing justice to the monster that he was yesterday. I don't care if UConn always struggles against mobile QBs, Robinson is something special.
The good: Michigan fans and Michigan Stadium. I can't say enough good things about the Michigan fans I met in Ann Arbor yesterday. They were a fantastic, friendly and knowledgeable bunch that created an incredibly welcoming and fun atmosphere. Inside the stadium I think the contingent of Husky fans acquitted themselves nicely, but they were completely overwhelmed by the size and passion of the Wolverine crowd. A fantastic experience all around.
What an awesome start. I could watch those highlights over and over and cackle with glee. I think I will again.
it was a pretty good day
Question, I thought by playing Gardner already burned his readshirt? But you say "but if Michigan goes into 2014 without a redshirt senior Gardner that will be a major missed opportunity." I thought there was a previous thread on that...
Yep, Gardner's normal freshman redshirt is burnt now. He could still be injured and receive a medical redshirt should he play in no games after Bowling Green, but yeah, its toasty. The other thing that is confusing is this: "I was irritated they played Will Campbell on special teams because he could redshirt if he's not even second team at NT. This is bad for multiple reasons." Will Campbell is a true sophomore. He can't redshirt unless its medically (someone please correct me if I'm wrong).
You can redshirt at any point in your college career. It doesn't have to be your first year in the program. You get 5 years to play 4 and can sit out, or redshirt, any one of them. So if Campbell never saw the field this year, they could treat it as a RS year.
I wonder what the percentage of players having a redshirt year taking that redshirt at any point other than their freshman year is. Its gotta be low. I think the reason Campbell played then is because the coaches have no false notions of him not playing at all this year. They wanted him to get the message that he needed to work to get back into the rotation, and if he does it, they fully intend to play him.
It has to be pretty low in football, but might be higher for other sports. I know that it happens a lot for Cross Country / indoor track / track runners. Often a runner will stay for 5 years and then use redshirt seasons as training seasons, avoiding the stress of racing for a few months by rotating their redshirt year through each of the three sports.
Like, say, Troy. Because you don't get a medical redshirt if you've still got a redshirt year. You have to use that up first. The medical comes into play if 1. you've played and get hurt or 2. if you've used your redshirt, as say a freshman, and get hurt later. Sometimes they'll grant you that 6th year.
I think that is wrong. A redshirt can be any year. The rule is 5 years to play 4.
Ohio State has a true junior lineman taking an academic redshirt this year, to make sure he stays eligible.
Insert joke here.
Actually that seems impressively on the up-and-up. Entirely correct set of priorities. Better to keep them eligible the conventional way, but this sure beats the scandal-laden FSU/UNC/etc alternative.
Won't Woolfolk take a medical redshirt as well? I thought he played as a true freshman.
He doesn't have to apply for a medical redshirt. He can take a regular one if he never plays.
I believe you're correct but Devin could get a wink, wink ,nudge ,nudge Hamstring or groin injury that causes him to miss the rest of the season after Tate's disciplinary issue is over. I believe it has to occur before 4 games are played or a certain amount of snaps are attained though. Maybe Campbell is just a disciplinary thing too since he came into camp over weight and he'll get reps soon, Like this Saturday or something.
I might be wrong on this but I always thought you could redshirt any year out of the first four to get the fifth.
EDIT: Just saw the same point made below but I do believe it is correct. For instance, if Forcier were to come back strong, Gardner could still conceivably redshirt next year when the QB situation was further stabilized.
I actually think Devin can STILL redshirt this year. One or 2 plays does not automatically chew up one year of eligibility. I remember Tony Gant getting injured in the 2nd or 3rd game of the season in 84 or 85 (can't remember which). He broke his leg on a punt return vs. Wisconsin and was granted a 6th year medical redshirt.
It just so happens that Karsch and Anderson were talking about this this morning and they cited some rule that says you can still redshirt if you've played LESS than 50% of your team's games in the first half of the season (wording is whacky, but that's how they put it).
I remember Tony Gant getting injured
In order to get a Medical Redshirt, Devin would have to see limited playing time in the first few games and suffer an injury. The option of a standard redshirt is no longer available this year. He could, in theory, take a standard redshirt either of the next few years if he doesn't see any game time.
That's a myth. It's not true. The reason it worked for Gant is he was injured.
What? No Henri!?
Haha, that was fantastic. I missed posts like this so much. Please please please don't be a mirage and evaporate. If the team plays like that week in and week out, there are going to win a bunch of games.
I also can't wait to see the entire chapters of the playbook that we didn't open on Saturday.
Yes, me too! I almost wish we didn't display that pass to Robinson and saved it for ND. At the same time, I think that play will still work a few times, just need to get the opposing defense used to a few bubble screens, and then boom, we're in!
Sidenote, talking to some ND fans, they seem to think Michigan not playing Tate this week is to trick ND this week. I think that's a silly thought, but it's funny that they're starting to wonder what to expect on saturday.
Or they continue to run the play and now that it's on film, DBs are backing down to cover the deep routes and the bubble screen opens up for big gains.
I think we learned a lot about Michigan on Saturday. One thing that's blatantly obvious, Denard Robinson is a defensive coordinator's nightmare.
Sidenote, talking to some ND fans, they seem to think Michigan not playing Tate this week is to trick ND this week.
Can you blame them? They're probably still a bit shellshocked from last year. I hope that someday soon we can have that Tate with this Denard.
Arguably the best first start by a Michigan QB ever is one hell of a trick.
I know... I can't wait to see what else RR's got up his sleeve...
Sure, prepare for Tate all week, and then try and figure out Denard cold. Works for me! (Not holding my breath...)
right before final drive and I may be off by a tenth or so but remember: 5.1 Smith, 4.7 Shaw.
Somebody needs to run the numbers here. This has become one of the major issues among the doubters but it looks like probably a nonissue.
that UConn blog is full of IT. Our Oline and WRs are MUCH better than theirs. our Dline is also better. that offensive performance is attributable to the OLine as much as to Denard.
IS IT SATURDAY YET?!?!!??!!??!?!?!
You always say it best Brian. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
the Slippery Rock score. The guy in front of me theorized that it had disappeared because SR plays night games, making the score unavailable for announcement during M games, but their schedule disproves that notion. In any case, I'm glad to see that great tradition return.
Also: their jerseys say "The Rock." How great is that?
A two day old Slippery Rock score is announced not just once, but two different times during Saturday's game. Awesome.
Big QB rushing yardage. Slippery Rock score announced. Biggest stadium. If a kid named Woolfolk was on the field it would have felt just like 1978.
What's the tradition behind announcing the Slippery Rock score?
Back in the 70s (and 80s, I think) the stadium announcer would read the Slippery Rock score after reading all the other scores from the major games. The crowd would go nuts when Slippery Rock won and boo loudly when they lost.
It was just a fun, quirky tradition -- the largest football crowd cheering wildly for a little school with an unlikely name. Most fans over 40 would probably remember it.
Don Canham actually had Slippery Rock play one of its games at the big house once. IIRC it drew a pretty good crowd.
And they played twice at the Big House. The first time they set an attendance record for their division.
And I think it kinda died out because Slippery Rock didn't appreciate it, because they thought we were making fun of them. When really, it was meant with all warmth.
I swear I remember it when I attended games as a kid in the early-to-mid 1990s.
Happy to hear it's back.
I statrted going to U of M games in the 1950's with my U of M parents and they loved the Slippery Rock schtich. How long has this been going on ( can you here the Mo-town?) been going on.... Reaaly does anybody know when they first started announcing the score?
And those downers are legitimate, despite our collective basking in the afterglow. Will not rehash them here, but suffice to say, if a team slows down DR it will be very interesting to see how we react. I think this strikes the correct tone: amazement at DR, suddenly sprouting optimism, combined with some realism and remembering that premature exhilaration is um, embarrassing. Not that I know anything about that.
How was the sound in the stadium? Was it noticbly louder than years past?
I was on the 33 yard line, row 19, seemed a lot louder, the student section echoed during the spell-out m-i-c-h-i-g-a-n and when the whole stadium rose up on third Downs it was damn loud
Yes, it was but the incredible happenings in the game will amplify noise a lot too.
I was in section 43, 46 rows up and I think on a calm day the band with mics will be much better sounding. I didn't hear much echoing. It was just weird at times because of the random movement of air. The reason I say this is because the warthogs were not very loud when they went over us. I usually wet myself when those things fly over and this time they were not loud at all. I attribute that to the wind.
The band being amplified brings a whole new feel to the stadium and there really is no need for rawk music.
extra cripsy, please.
And what kind of side would you like with that...?
I do think the UFR will show a lot more pressure than you suggest here. Roh was terrorizing their backfield the whole first half. No sacks, true, but a LOT of hurries if I remember and they were relying almost exclusively on quick developing pass plays so not a lot of opportunities for sacks.
After watching Donovan McNabb, Vince Young, Troy Smith, Dennis Dixon, etc. shred the Michigan defense as dual threat QBs for all these years it feels really good to inflict that kind of helpless frustration on others. Now that guy plays for Michigan!
and you can throw Juice Williams in there. After more than a decade of watching these guys run all over us and wanting to pull your hair out and put a brick through your TV, we finally have one of our own. I thought one of Denard's most impressive plays was when 2 or 3 defenders converged on him in the pocket and it looked like a sure sack, but he somehow spun out of it and got the pass off. Even though it was incomplete, it reminded me of Troy Smith et. al. and how frustrating they were to watch.
Extra miler imo.
Great, great post. I loved the Amélie clip. As usual, it captures our mood perfectly. A little snicker at "introducing a bunch of program icons and Greg Mathews" (I love the guy but . . . yeah). This whole thing just feels like waking up after a bad dream. Is it time for the 2006 OSU game yet?