I brought this up in the insanity thread (you know the one I mean). The thing i don't get is this: why are these 2 QBs considered to reside
at opposite ends of the spectrum? i mean, if Navarre is 1 and Mike Vick
is 100, i get the sense that sheridan is like 55 and Threet is a 45.
why do people think sheridan is an 85 and threet a 15? (i hope it's
obvious that i'm not talking talent/NCAA09 scale in this metric, but
rather 'style of QBing' independent of talent)
And it's the same with the offense... one QB will not have a greatly
different package than the other. because (IMO) both are closer in
skill sets than most think, I think the offense is essentially INDEP of
the QB (removing CB23 and Feagin aside). Therefore, what it comes down
to is this: which can run this offense more successfully? that means
which is more accurate, makes better decisions, holds on to the ball
and yes, which can make a little something out of nothing with their
legs or their arm or their pocket presence or whatever.