Scrappy Used To Be An Insult Comment Count

Brian

3/25/2016 – Michigan 3, Notre Dame 2 (OT) – 25-7-5
3/26/2016 – Michigan 2, North Dakota 5 – 25-8-5, season over

25964265392_0b5e1b65cb_z

[Patrick Barron]

When things went badly for Michigan this year, they tended to go bad in bunches. An inability to get a clean zone exit against certain hyperactive teams led to periods where Michigan got bombarded in its own end. Until the tournament these periods weren't even against good teams, since there weren't any on the schedule.

Half the time Michigan would fight back out of these holes, sometimes wielding puck-loaded tommy guns. (Literally: before the North Dakota game Michigan was 4-4-4 going into the third period down.) While the Notre Dame game wasn't quite as explosive as various Big Ten comebacks, they did rebound from a horrendous second period on Friday to get a grip on the game, one they would eventually use to win the game on a gorgeous behind-the-back pass from JT Compher.

That was something. Through two periods that game felt like nothing so much as the last time Notre Dame and Michigan played. That CCHA championship game was Michigan's last ditch attempt to salvage their tourney streak. Michigan grabbed an early lead in the kind of game that feels over as soon as the opposition ties it; Notre Dame tied it. There was a flicker there of something different. If only someone else, something else loomed.

There was no similar respite against North Dakota, and that's the problem.

Michigan and North Dakota are, or at least were, mirror images of each other. They recruit speed and skill directly after high school. They're piled high with NHL draft picks. They win a ton of games and get shot down in the tournament by bloody, goofy fate. But these last two meetings, spread out as they are over five years, demonstrate that the programs have diverged.

The first was the Tiny Jesus game. Michigan got outshot 2 to 1, gave up a blizzard of grade A scoring chances, and saw Shawn Hunwick stone every last one of them. I thought about that game on Saturday; North Dakota fans thought about that game on Saturday. Neither of us were happy to think about that game. Never has a team absolutely crushing their opponent without having anything to show for it on the scoreboard induced so much despair in their own fans as I imagine North Dakota did during that first period. At one point shots were 15-3, and all underthings were in danger of soiling.

That state of affairs took an irrationally long time to resolve itself, because single elimination playoff hockey is barely weighted plinko. You know this; you saw Michigan bomb Air Force's goalie over and over to no effect. The "hot goalie" thing has always seemed to be a bad way to think about the fact that hockey is pretty random.

Anyway, this is what I meant when I said the plinko was in our favor this year: Michigan wasn't in North Dakota's class except on the scoreboard. By the end of the game Michigan had once again been outshot 2 to 1. They gave up nearly 50 shots.

25964259622_195e578cd6_z

[Barron]

In the years bookended by these games, North Dakota has been slashed down in the Frozen Four twice and at this stage twice. Michigan saw entire four-year careers come and go without a tourney bid. Last year's team had the NHL rookie of the year, another guy who played 70 games right out of college, and Hobey finalist Zach Hyman and couldn't make the tourney. A team with Jacob Trouba on it missed the tourney. This team features a top line of future NHLers, one of whom was so rampant he will win the Hobey himself, and Racine's performance is the only thing disguising the fact they got run off the ice by North Dakota.

The talent is there; has always been there. The team is not on an elite level anymore.

I guess trying hard and going down fighting to a vastly superior team is preferable to some of the alternatives we saw over the past few years. That assertion was featured in some pushback on Twitter after I said "it's over" for Red, as if Michigan—Michigan!—was some try-hard program that's just happy to be here. I guess some people are just happy to be here, these days.

I was one of them for most of the year because I'd resigned myself to the fact that Michigan hockey isn't what it once was. This is indisputably true. Michigan once was a team with a 22-year tourney streak. Michigan used to go out like North Dakota, shaking their fists after dominating attack time and possession. That hasn't happened for a long time, and it's hard to envision a Red team that will do that in the future.

So, no, Michigan Daily, Red should not return next year. This season is not a return to form. It is an extension of same against a terrible schedule with a transcendent one-and-done. If there wasn't a ready-made candidate waiting in the wings there might be a case. But there is, and it's time for Mel Pearson to get the job he's waited 30 years for. Only Red can make that call; here's hoping he does.

Bullets

A thought for Steve Racine. For Racine to finish this season with a save percentage of .914 is a danged miracle. Even so he has to endure goofs like Dave Starman deriding him as Michigan's weak point despite the fact that there can't be another goalie on a decent team in the country who endured the same shot quality he did. He made some big mistakes at times—two goals came from outside the blueline this year—but he is clearly Michigan's best goalie since Shawn Hunwick.

The statistics will not reflect this assertion. The scatter charts will.

large[1]

The Big Ten excuse doesn't fly. Have seen a number of assertions that Michigan was ill-prepared to play North Dakota because they are good and the Big Ten is not. Such assertions fail to deal with the fact that Michigan got run over by Ohio State just three weeks ago, that Michigan didn't even win the not good league, that Michigan had control over 14 nonconference games and came up with BU and nobody else within spitting distance of an at-large bid.

Michigan's defense was a travesty most of the year; there was plenty of opportunity to fix it,  but it didn't get fixed, just like it didn't get fixed any of the last four years.

Looking towards next year. Mike Spath says that Werenski, Downing, and Connor are almost certainly out the door and that Motte and Compher will get pushed by NHL teams to sign.

Those two guys will have to decide between getting a jump on their entry level contracts or returning and having the flexibility Zach Hyman did after his senior year. Hyman forced a trade to the Leafs and is now in the NHL permanently since Mike Babcock loves him. I've also heard that Compher is in Ross and has a very high profile degree he can complete next year, which is motivation to return.

If Michigan gets Motte and Compher back their lines might look something like this:

  1. Motte-Compher-Kile
  2. Calderone-Marody-Warren
  3. Dancs-Shuart-Pastujov
  4. Lockwood-Merl-Sanchez

Pastujov, Sanchez, and Lockwood should be mid-round picks in the upcoming draft.

D:

  1. De Jong-C. Martin
  2. Cecconi-Boka
  3. L. Martin-Luce

Luce will be a mid-round pick.

That's not bad but it lacks an out-and-out star on defense unless Luke Martin, who's eligible for the 2017 draft, is the top-15-pick various mock draft sites are projecting him as.

If Compher and Motte depart things start getting grim. The only forwards not listed above are Evan Allen, Niko Porikos, and incoming PWO Lukas Samuelsson.

Breakout failures. It was uncanny how North Dakota destroyed Michigan by attacking the second pass. Most of the time a D's pass up to a forward saw that F under immediate pressure, whereupon he either threw it up the ice blindly or turned it over right there. It reminded me of watching the USMNT play Germany in the most recent world cup. North Dakota's forecheck is a high press that destroyed Michigan's offensive rhythm for most of the game. Their goals were more or less both on the power play; at 5x5 they did not score.

5x5: all of it. Michigan had one full power play in 130 minutes of hockey and drew one other penalty. This was a disaster for the nation's top power play. It resulted from a combination of excellent discipline from opponents, Michigan's inability to possess the puck, and refs lacking the courage to blow the whistle.

This was particularly acute in the Saturday game. An obvious interference call as Motte attempted to dump and chase in the first five minutes of the North Dakota game went unpunished, and after that it was free-for-all for both teams. By the third period Michigan defensemen could get their stick slashed out of their hands repeatedly with no reaction from the referee.

North Dakota was the superior team and deserved to win the game, but I'm frustrated that the game tilted even further to them because the refs decided that playoff hockey has different rules than regular hockey.

A fitting end. Michael Downing's slashing penalty with two and half minutes left was the final nail in the coffin, and a fitting way for him to go out. It was a two-handed chop down on a guy's arm in a situation where you'd rather just let the guy take his shot. I can't remember a more frustrating player other than maybe the freshman version of Jack Johnson, and Johnson was incredible as a sophomore.

Meanwhile Downing never shook the violence and bad decisions that plagued his game at Michigan. Notre Dame's opening goal on Friday was an odd-man rush he ceded with an awful decision. He then compounded it by falling down as the play entered the defensive zone.

I don't think Michigan will miss a beat without him. They went 3-0 during his various suspensions this year.

Comments

turd ferguson

March 28th, 2016 at 4:47 PM ^

I love Red.  I will always love Red.  I think that man brought a lot of happiness (and happy, horrible stress) to my life and built something that I will enjoy for a very long time.  But I'm with you that it's time for Pearson.  Pearson took Michigan Tech from shitshow to respectable overnight and from respectable to good a couple of years later.  His teams outperform any reasonable expectations from the talent they have, and he'd have more than enough talent to work with in Ann Arbor.  If Pearson signals that he'd decline an offer right now, then I'm fine holding off for another year, partly just to take another run at him then.  But I hope Red realizes that the best way to serve the program he built is to bring Pearson back to Michigan, and then I hope that Red himself gets the recognition he deserves.

Kevin13

March 29th, 2016 at 9:18 AM ^

Red is a legend, but his prime is well past him and it's time to turn the program over to someone else, hopefully Mel. The team seems to under perform every year and never play up to the talent level they have. I just think, at Red's age, he just doesn't relate to these kids anymore and doesn't know how to get the best out of them anymore.

Yostnut

March 29th, 2016 at 11:28 AM ^

I have to say that I find this "Fire Red" talk mystifying. How can you say that he doesn't relate to kids today or get the best out of them when we just saw a line wirh three blue chip recruits score over 80 goals? Lots of kids still want to play for him. Yeah, we couldn't beat NoDak, but not many teams can. And, hockey plinko. And maybe Red hasn't one the big one for a while, but he has more tourney wins than any active coach. Who has a better resume? Maybe Jack Parker, but nobody else. Mel Pearson is a great coach at Tech, and he should get consideration to be our next coach when Red does retire, but there's no guarantee at all that he'll be able to run a top tier program like Michigan successfully. I mean, was Tech in the tourney? Be careful what you wish for.

Bigku22

March 28th, 2016 at 4:55 PM ^

I know it works for basketball, but bball is a sport where generally the better team wins a majority of the time. On hockey, having a one game elimination tourney where regionals are played on back to back nights vs different teams is beyond stupid. It's sets up basically a complete random tournament with huge variance in regards to what the end result will be. Regionals should be best of 3, or take the champions league format and play 2 games back to back and the winner is the higher aggregate total. Anything but a one game elimination. This is one of my big turn offs with college hockey, it's just a fluke tournament with no real predictive nature.

turd ferguson

March 28th, 2016 at 5:21 PM ^

Yeah, I always feel like Michigan's chance to win the tournament, once they're in, is 1/2^4.  It just feels random.  Personally, I'd love to see an eight team tournament with best-of-3s for three straight weeks.  The automatic bids don't do much for me, especially when it's not that cool/fun/surprising when there's an upset, and eight teams in the tournament seems like more than enough given the relatively small number of schools with programs.  I'm not sure that teams 9-16 really deserve getting as good a shot at a title as they get.  Plus, I remember thinking the CCHA best-of-3s were a lot of fun, though that might just be sentimentality talking.

Bigku22

March 28th, 2016 at 6:51 PM ^

Best of 3. Less teams. Anything other than the current "spin of the roulette wheel" the tourney is now. It renders the seeding and really the majority of regular season body of work meaningless.

In the basketball tourney getting a 1 seed is crucial, and has been verified by years of data in which a 16 has never beat a 1. That level of predictiveness make upsets when they do happen, truly meaningfull and shocking. It also provides value for the teams that have performed best during the regular season. In hockey its just a complete crap shoot. 

Idk maybe that's just the random nature of hockey which bothers me. The NHL playoffs which are best of 7 still see a high level variance and lower seeds upsetting higher seeds is pretty commonplace. Regardless, it's hard to really value the accomplishments of a tournament that just feels like a bunch of coin flips. If you land heads 4 times in a row, congrats you're the National Champ. 

gwkrlghl

March 28th, 2016 at 6:05 PM ^

12 teams, two game aggregate the first two rounds, then the frozen four. I don't know why they bailed off it immediately but it did prevent one notable would-be upset

(2) Lake State lost their first game 4-3 to (6) Merrimack but then won game 2 5-0 to advance and they ended up winning the whole thing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_NCAA_Division_I_Men%27s_Ice_Hockey_Tournament

Sambojangles

March 29th, 2016 at 9:50 AM ^

I dunno, I think it's more the fact that it's only 16 teams compared to 64 (I mean 68). If the basketball tournament were only the Sweet 16 teams, we might realize that it is almost as random as hockey. This year, all four 1s made it to the Sweet 16 (Elite 8 even) but only one made it to the Final Four. I think the fact that 1s make it to the FF as much as they do is more a function of an easier path in the first couple rounds, where they play a 16 (and never lose) and an 8/9 (generally a mediocre team from a big conference or an at-large from a mid-major, not great teams either way).

King Douche Ornery

March 28th, 2016 at 4:59 PM ^

Even the guys who write blogs for this blog complain like stuck pigs about refereeing.'

Geezus this is the whiniest, crying bunch of fan boys in the world.

Yinka Double Dare

March 28th, 2016 at 5:05 PM ^

The Blackhawks love Motte (he came in for a lot of glowing reports from last year's prospect camp) and have several pending UFAs in their top 3 lines. I'd expect them to sign him.

gwkrlghl

March 28th, 2016 at 5:06 PM ^

Downing makes bone headed plays but at least tries. Guptill was lazy. He could've been a superstar but instead decidely he'd rather coast up and down the ice. Llwellyn has to be in Downing's realm as well as he had less talent and a gift for taking the stupidest collection of penalties I've ever had the misfortune of seeing a single player take

MichiganHockey27

March 28th, 2016 at 5:22 PM ^

Does anyone feel neutral about Downing leaving?  As mentioned above, his recklessness and turnovers make him a defensive liability.  He's definitely a physical defenseman, which fits well at the next level, and the B1G has already been quick to suspend him.  I can argue it's addition by subtraction, but if he could clean up the defensive zone play I wouldn't mind having him on the PP next year.  Blue liners are going to have to step up big time next year, especially on the PP.

As for Red, it's hard to argue against a legend.  I'm very biased, and I believe he's ran this program the way it should be ran for the last 32 years.  I put as much blame on Wiseman and Powers as I do Red for the last couple of years.  I personally would like to see him come back for one more year, but wouldn't be opposed to seeing Mel come in.  I have a lot of respect for him, and know he'll continue taking us in the right direction.  

Don

March 28th, 2016 at 9:27 PM ^

Doesn't Red control who his assistants are? He's the head coach, right?

He's 76 years old. The number of head coaches in any sport at this level who are truly getting the job done at that age is miniscule. He should have voluntarily retired several years ago, and that's not unfair or a disservice to him or his achievements at Michigan.

I'm not trying to minimize what retirement for somebody like Red means. It means taking him out of the thing that he's been doing for virtually his entire life—being around hockey and hockey players on a near-daily basis. It's a huge adjustment that many professionals dread, since their life seems empty otherwise.

The problem is that time cannot be denied. Its passage rob your skills and energy. You cannot defeat it; all you can do is delay it. Red has done an amazing job in his career, and hanging it up in no way diminishes what he's achieved. If he hadn't been savaged over the last 15 years by the continual departure of his most talented players before they even became juniors, there's no doubt in my mind that he'd have at least two more national championships.

Sac Fly

March 28th, 2016 at 7:37 PM ^

If you've been watching games pre 2005, and I mean at the games, you would know the difference between old Red and new Red. Red used to be a drill sergeant during games. He's not anymore. The word out of practice is that he's more hesitant to chew a guy out; subsequently guys like Kevin Clare and Alex Guptil have come through and shit on the program. That would have never happened under old Red. Old Red chewing the team out used to be something of legend. He is a legend, but he's not the old Red anymore. It's time to hang it up.

rob f

March 28th, 2016 at 10:57 PM ^

is over (they came oh-so-close to blowing a 3-0 lead in the final few minutes), I'll finally ask: If not Mel, then what? What if he says no? That's my biggest worry here. I don't feel nearly as confident of Mel's return as I did of Harbaugh saying yes to Hackett. And I absolutely DON'T want Wiseman (or Powers, though thankfully he doesnt seem as likely to be under consideration) to be the fallback option. Let's not be Wisky or Minnesota and blow it. Both programs were contenders pretty much yearly until choosing wrong HC's and having the bottom drop out. Michigan has been so uneven for a long enough period of time now that it's absolutely vital that we get a top-notch HC or we become a perennial 2nd level team in a 2nd level conference.

Michigan Difference

March 29th, 2016 at 11:37 AM ^

Sure, Mel is a Michigan Tech alum and Harbaugh is a Michigan alum, but Mel spent the majority of his adult life living in the Ann Arbor area and coaching at Michigan, whereas Harbaugh had not lived in Ann Arbor since college.

The 49ers were a mess, but he likely would have his pick of 4 or 5 NFL teams.  On the other hand, there are only a handful of college hockey teams at the level of Michigan and turnover is typically less, meaning if Mel turned down Michigan, he may not get a similar opportunity down the road.

Alton

March 29th, 2016 at 11:59 AM ^

Well, Mel is 57 years old and his contract with Michigan Tech expires when he is 62.  I am pretty certain that getting job offers "down the road" isn't a concern for him--either he wants to coach at Michigan or he wants to stay in Houghton. 

I don't know what is going on, but for some reason I suspect that they are trying to get Pearson right now, and they will keep trying for one more year while Berenson coaches, but will also have a backup candidate lined up in case Pearson says "no."

This is all, of course, pure speculation.

Alton

March 29th, 2016 at 1:49 PM ^

How do you know that?  I have heard people state pretty confidently that he is probably just going to stay in Houghton; I have heard other people like you state just as confidently that he is just waiting for a call from Ann Arbor.

I suspect that both groups are lying to me, and Mr. Pearson will only make a decision when he has to.