Home
DON'T PANIC

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • BlogPoll
    • Join
    • Blogpoll Editorial Guy @ CBS
    • Votes By Blog
    • Votes By Team
    • Voting Philosophy
    • Links For Voters
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2011 Recruiting Board
    • 2010 Recruiting Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
Home

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • Brian @ TSB
  • Brian @ Bucknuts
  • Hail To The Victors 2009
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • @MGoBlog (Twitter)
  • mgo.licio.us
  • RSS Feed
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Blah Blah Blah
  • Bo Schemblogger
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • MGoBlue Football
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Football Recruiting
  • Michigan Football Saturdays
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • Michigan Sports Center
  • Ron Bellamy's Underachieving All Stars
  • Spawn of M Zone
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Diag
  • The Game
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Three And Out
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Varsity Blue
  • When Carcajous Attack!
  • Wolverine Liberation Army
  • Wolverines Daily
  • iBlog For Cookies

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinitalk
    • Illini Basketball Fans
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Hoosier Report
    • Behind The Plate
    • Cannot Falter
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • Buck Bravo
    • TNABACG
  • Northwestern
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • ND Choo Choo
    • The House Rock Built
    • The Blue-Gray Sky
  • Ohio State
    • We Will Always Have Tempe
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Jim Tressel's Head
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • November 2009 (72)
  • October 2009 (107)
  • September 2009 (132)
  • August 2009 (94)
  • July 2009 (56)
  • June 2009 (42)
  • May 2009 (41)
  • April 2009 (49)
  • March 2009 (59)
  • February 2009 (60)
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

CFB Betting Odds

Get free Michigan Wolverine college football predictions and NCAA basketball picks.

For the best football picks and online football betting information visit BangTheBook.com

Get great Michigan college football tickets for an amazing price from OnlineSeats. We have every team and every sport, including Tigers tickets.



Sports Betting Lines: Betting on All Sports: Real sports betting action. Try LinesMaker.com for free sports betting lines updated in real time. Massive free sports bets and cash bonuses for new members. Sign up for free!

Sports Betting Lines: Preview all sports betting lines and odds at LinesMaker! We have live betting odds and lines for all sports events. It doesn't get any better than this: Sportsbetting3.com offers the best college football betting and pro football NFL betting. Like casino games? Discover the best online casinos at the top casino site, Plazacasinos.com

Check out the Penn State preview. Get free College Football Picks from the National Sports Advisors.

Get free College basketball Picks and basketball odds at Doc's Sports.

Have a fantasy league? You can find quality Trophies for every sport at Lamb Awards.

Fooball Betting from Bet Vega.

TheSeats.com has tickets for all your NCAA football favorites like the Michigan Wolverines, Nebraska Cornhuskers, Wisconsin Badgers, Rose Bowl tickets and many more!

Beveled Guilt

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Baseball Early Signings
    formerlyanonymous - 1 hour ago
  • On The Eve of Battle....
    jsquigg - 1 hour ago
  • By The Numbers - The Game
    The Mathlete - 5 hours ago
  • Big 10 Picks: What Is Michigan Football Edition
    jamiemac - 6 hours ago
  • Ugly Game of the Week - Week 12 Is MAC-tacular!
    stubob - 7 hours ago
  •  
  • 1 of 292
  • ››
more
  • An Interview with Dillon Baxter
    TomVH - 3,769 views
  • Michigan has gone from a rally team to a fall apart team
    Brhino - 3,423 views
  • 2010 Outlook - The Defense
    AC1997 - 3,323 views
  • A Countenance More in Sorrow Than in Anger
    Misopogon - 2,707 views
  • The Rodriguez Record Developing Defensive Talent at UM
    PurpleStuff - 2,485 views
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
more
  • What it means to me to be a "Walmart Wolverine"
    Plegerize - 103 comments
  • A Countenance More in Sorrow Than in Anger
    Misopogon - 72 comments
  • An Interview with Dillon Baxter
    TomVH - 66 comments
  • Michigan has gone from a rally team to a fall apart team
    Brhino - 48 comments
  • Spread Run Game Nuances
    steve sharik - 45 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Tom
  • CBS's Spencer Tillman picks Michigan over OSU
    1 replies
  • Offensive UFR
    3 replies
  • New Record for M Defense?
    2 replies
  • should michigan have....
    4 replies
  • Fire Rich Rod buttons
    14 replies
  • Rich Rodriguez Chant for tomorrow
    4 replies
  • This is'nt going to happen but what if???
    23 replies
  • Words of Wisdom from Charles Woodson
    10 replies
  • Take the Over or the Under?
    9 replies
  • Anti-Ohio State Chants
    11 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 41
  • ››
  • Don't liveblog the OSU game
    23 replies
  • CBS's Spencer Tillman picks Michigan over OSU
    1 replies
  • Offensive UFR
    3 replies
  • Hanlon Letter
    25 replies
  • should michigan have....
    4 replies
  • New Record for M Defense?
    2 replies
  • Picture Inspired by Shredder
    12 replies
  • This is'nt going to happen but what if???
    23 replies
  • Fire Rich Rod buttons
    14 replies
  • I made a hype video
    8 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 41
  • ››
  • 500 things we love about Ohio st.
    155 replies
  • 97.1 (mike valenti) reporting that the ground has been laid to let RR go if michigan gets blown out...
    129 replies
  • OT: Friday Night College Football Open Thread
    126 replies
  • I'm sorry guys...I just can't get excited about this game.
    123 replies
  • Michigan Wisconsin Game thread
    102 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 82
  • ››
  • Questions about some less talked about prospects
    7 replies
  • News that was reported a couple hours ago...
    53 replies
  • Holmes Onwukaife Update
    28 replies
  • "Weekend visitors" thread
    37 replies
  • Tate's Status - Weekend Visitors
    22 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

Football betting

If you're looking for online football betting, look no further! Party Bets is safe, fast and secure.

NCAA basketball odds

Get live NCAA basketball odds from multiple sportsbooks at OddsShark.com

Sad Pandas

By Brian — October 12th, 2009 at 10:39 AM — 124 comments
Filed under:
  • column-type things
  • game columns
  • iowa
  • rich rodriguez
  • sad panda
  • tate forcier
  • trip report
  • wtf

10/10/2009 – Michigan 28, Iowa 30 – 4-2, 1-2 Big Ten

 tate-forcier-benched denard-robinson-is-a-sad-panda

screenshot via MVictors; Denard Robinson as sad panda from the News via Genuinely Sarcastic and Mike Desimone.

This is probably a time to dispense with the fooferah and get right to the heart of the matter. From our vantage point from the endzone of Kinnick Stadium our instant assumption when Denard Robinson came in was that Forcier had gotten hurt on one of two earlier plays. We couldn't see a whole lot, but we saw a lot of Michigan's third quarter—unfortunately because they spent it next to the wrong endzone. Forcier banged his hand on someone's helmet, then later took a wicked shot from some defensive lineman or another moments after launching another incompletion.

When Robinson came out with around six minutes left, we had a debate about the idea, coming down on the side of "not good." Though Robinson was surprisingly effective driving Michigan for a score-tightening touchdown, the run-based nature of the drive stripped more than three minutes off the clock and saw Michigan attempt an onside kick with about 3:20 left and one timeout. This, too, was seen as a sign that Forcier was hurt: surely if you're going to cast your lot with Denard Robinson on a drive to win you need the ability to run the ball quite a bit. Kicking deep with only Robinson available is tantamount to waving the white flag.

So all that fit together and when Robinson came out after Michigan's defense thwarted Iowa on their attempt to strangle the game, it made sense. Forcier was unavailable, and this was the best Michigan could do. And, hell, it was working all right until Robinson eschewed what looked like a wide open Martavious Odoms in favor of Michigan's third or fourth jump ball into safety coverage. This one did not clatter to the turf harmlessly. As we say in UFR, EOG.

So… yeah. The news that Forcier had to be bodily escorted off the field before Michigan's last drive was less than thrilling. I'm sure this will be breaking no new ground after a couple days of checking in on the blog to see just which items raging about the decision needed to be excised, but for the record:

WHAT

THE

HELL

?

There are a billion comments across the internet calling the decision "indefensible," many of them drawing direct parallels to the last time a Michigan team visited Iowa. John Beilein sat Manny Harris down for overtime, Michigan lost when Iowa hit an array of circus shots and Manny's replacement, David Merritt, continued being a walk-on instead of Manny Harris, and a very large number of people were peeved, livid, or somewhere in between. This space in the aftermath of that decision:

If he thought Michigan had a better chance to win with David Merritt on the floor, he's nuts. More likely he had about reached his limit and sat him in what appears to be a fit of pique. I get that: Harris at the moment is a basketball doppelganger of Braylon Edwards in his afro phase, when he was benched because he and Carr weren't "on the same page" despite his clear superiority to Michigan's other receiving options. Edwards wised up and blew up. Harris? We'll see.

I would have preferred the teachable moment had not come in overtime of a crucial road game, though. You know.

The two incidents are creepily similar, and my opinion about Saturday is about identical to my opinion about the Manny benching: there were a ton of good reasons to make the move that don't come close to outweighing the enormous one that argued against it. If Michigan had gotten that onside kick and Robinson had three minutes to work with, okay. With 1:40 on the clock, no timeouts, and sixty yards to go, no.

------------------------

So where does that leave us? Michigan's just experienced a two point loss on the road against a top-15 team during which they were –4 in turnover margin. They got outgained again. Forcier was pretty terrible. Robinson displayed both his talent and his limitations. Rodriguez made a poor decision in the heat of the moment, bursting this site's obvious hope that he was Jesus Ferguson. They're 4-2 in the league with three games they should win left, which would leave them at 7-5 if they don't pick off one of Penn State, Wisconsin, or Ohio State. A walk-on has permanently ascended to the starting lineup.

Add that all together and you get… I don't know. A jumbled mess that's clearly not as soul-destroying as last year's merry band of incompetence but not in any respect good. Michigan has been significantly outgained in each of four games against teams outside of the MAC, and mitigating factors like special teams and turnovers can no longer patch those gaps up. After all that at the start of the season, Michigan's settled about where everyone expected they'd be: still digging out from nuclear winter, looking towards the future with hope and the present with tolerance, at best.

The emotions I had coming out of Kinnick were as much of a mess as the team is. Michigan shot itself in a thousand different ways, busting coverages on two tight end touchdowns and a third and twenty-five that was more damaging than any of the five (five!) turnovers they gacked up with little assistance from Iowa. It was really frustrating to walk away feeling that Michigan should have won but for their own errors—errors that at this point are obviously a fundamental part of what the team is—but the memory of last year hovered, suggesting that the mere idea that errors were only a part of the whole this time around represented progress. Clearly, there is a long way yet to go.

Bullets

  • I know I make fun of people in the comments who believe I have some sort of crazy power over the fortunes of Michigan football that I only use for evil, but dammit Greg Mathews, not only did you drop a punt, give Iowa the ball at the Michigan 16, and eventually lead to that short-field Tony Moeaki touchdown, you did it mere hours after I suggested that I should stop typing HOLD ON TO THE DAMN BALL as the key matchup in the special teams section. It's hard not to feel personally responsible even though that's completely insane.
  • Have seen a number of complaints about the timeout with 27 seconds left before halftime. I wanted Rodriguez to call it at the time; after some consideration I think that was probably not a good idea either. Even if Michigan gets a stop on that third and ten they'd have the ball somewhere on their side of the field with 12 seconds on the clock or whatever. In general I like the bent of Rodriguez's decisions; that one was wrong.
  • Another TO complaint: Michigan shouldn't have taken one on third and ten from the one and a half. Just take the penalty there and Michigan's got another 40 seconds to work with on their final drive. I understand it's hard to break the natural inclination to take a timeout when the playclock gets way low, though. That's a corner case that doesn't come up much.
  • I don't know exactly whose fault the two busted coverages were but if, as rumored, it was Mike Williams I don't know what you do about it. Woolfolk was physically capable at cornerback and Michigan finally went with the press man they've been talking about since Greg Robinson got hired. Williams definitely let an Iowa receiver behind him on third and twenty-fing-five, and if Moeaki was his guy on either of his touchdowns he's directly responsible for all three Iowa touchdowns. Maybe Iowa would have done something with the last drive, but the first Moeaki TD was on third and twelve; a stop there is a FG attempt. A stop on the third and twenty-five is a punt.
  • Michigan did break out some new stuff, grinding Brandon Minor into the line from the I on a successful, Bo-pleasing late touchdown drive and debuting a quick pitch to the sideline that never looked like it was going anywhere but also never failed to gain four to six yards. The former is something Michigan could have tried against State; the latter was probably hampered by Forcier's shoulder issues.
  • It seemed like after the first interception from Forcier that he refused to throw to receivers who were open. On a couple third downs there were slants available (I think) that Forcier did not take, instead running around as is his wont. I was pretty frustrated by him, and imagine that Rodriguez was ready to strangle the kid.
  • Graham shouldn't be rushing the punter on a punt safe, not that it mattered.

Trip Report Section

City. I can tell you about a lovely Econolodge in Davenport, Iowa, but despite driving out Friday and spending about all of Saturday in Iowa City, I can't tell you much about the city itself. My momentary first impression was that this was a foofy college down as I strolled by some organic eatery down one of those cobbled pedestrian streets you see wherever people are trying to create an area for foot traffic. Then we went in a bar that had six things on the menu, asked if you wanted ranch with your waffle fries, and attempted to purvey something called a "walking taco," which the waitress explained was "um, it's like Doritos in a bag with some meat and cheese and onions and taco stuff thrown in." The stalls in the bathroom didn't have doors on them.

So I was a little confused. I was referring to this experience at the Black Heart Gold Pants tailgate, and I was talking about this place we were, and when asked where, exactly, we were I rakishly pulled out my zinger: "the place with no doors on the stalls." The response was "which one? There are lots of those." So… yeah. Iowa City leans towards the no doors on the stalls. I guess. I saw the inside of a bar, a parking lot, and Kinnick. I am not a one-man Yelp here.

Fans. Excellent. There was the usual dose of meathead yellin' at the guys in the wrong colors—sort of, anyway, the difference between maize and blue and black and gold is not drastic—that you get whenever you go anywhere other than South Bend. Other than that everyone was perfectly nice. At no point did I feel like someone was going to hit me, which is more than I can say for the last few trips to Columbus or East Lansing.

I will note that the male student body of Iowa appears to be 80% meathead.

Kinnick experience, in total. Very classy. All brick exterior, looks like I'd like to see Michigan Stadium end up looking like once they figure out what they're going to do in the endzones:

kinnick-stadium-exterior

Anthony Ciatti

And the interior:

kinnick-stadium-concourse

Anthony Ciatti

The stadium itself was a bit smaller than I'd expected. Our seats were strange: section "NB," which ended up standing for "North Bleachers" and was not listed on the map or at all familiar to the first two people we tried to talk to about just where the hell we were supposed to sit. An usher had clue, though, and directed us to five rows of makeshift metal bleachers that were literally on the field in the endzone. We stood the whole game, which was fine because from appearances so did the rest of the place.

Despite that, it didn't seem particularly noisy. It got loud on important third downs but I thought it was about on part with Michigan Stadium. FWIW. I am apparently terrible at discerning variable noise levels, given my reaction to this year's addition of luxury boxes.

There's a full gallery by Anthony here.

PIPE IT IN BABY. The Iowa marching band might as well not exist. I don't know if this was a homecoming thing, but they didn't even march pregame—the alumni band did—and had a seriously abbreviated halftime show so that a Hawkeye inductee to the CFHOF could get his due. During the game they hardly played, and when they did play they mostly played marching band versions of songs that had already been piped in over the PA.

Oh, also:

This disaster was played incessantly over the PA, and we, not being 14-year-old-girls, didn't know what it was. Friend of Blog joked that it was probably a Jonas Brothers song, and we laughed, and then we thought to ourselves IS that a Jonas Brothers song? It turns out no, but it's by the Black Eyed Peas, which is 95% as emasculating. Hell, this imeem playlist by one Shelby Veppert, who—no foolies—is a 19-year old from Columbus who lists Nickelback(!!!) as one of her favorite bands, has the song sandwiched between two Jonas Brothers songs. If Michigan Stadium ever has anything that can be considered a sort of theme song I'm going to buy out Ann Arbor Torch & Pitchfork, and if it's ever something as terrifyingly fey as that thing, I'll storm the castle myself.

Site note: Michigan's homecoming activities murder Iowa's, chop them up, and put them in a bag. Iowa basically has the alumni band play the fight song and march off the field, then has a tedious announcement of various alumni who helped out and the members of the homecoming court*. And that's it. Michigan has a goofy prohibition-era cheer, awesome flipping 80-year-old alumni cheerleaders, a terrific combined-band halftime show, and that one crazy old drum-major who rips it up every year. I love homecoming at Michigan Stadium, and was excited to get the Iowa version of it. I didn't get it.

*(The homecoming king was a bioengineering (or something along those lines) major named Rohit… Naha… Romin… fromblobololgbogl. The telltale pause from the very Iowan public address announcer after the poorly-pronounced "Rohit" promised three seconds of pure unadulterated awesome, and that promise was delivered upon.)

  • Login or register to post comments
  • ShareThis

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 11:29 PM #1
Pasty White Irishman
Joined: 2009-10-12
Points: 3
Offline
Hawk Fan Comments...

Brian,

I was impressed with the Wolverines, and while I can understand Michigan fans being down I see a lot of progress. This team plays harder than any of three loss Lloyd's last few teams. I think you physically matched up well, which hasn't always been the case against a Ferentz coached Iowa team.

You guys get great athletes as always and RR will get them into the system. I think the brand of ball will be very, very exciting.

Please, please beat those bastards in Columbus!

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 4:25 PM #2
Slinginsam
Joined: 2009-06-17
Points: 186
Online
Why CoachRod Went Batshit

I am guessing Tate is given fairly specific reads and checks for which to look. Perhaps he overstepped his boundaries several times, temporarily forgetting that this is no longer an improv routine at a Scripps Ranch HS game, but rather, a veteran, highly disciplined D-I opponent who has memorized hours of film of how you move and to whom you are throwing.

RichRod probably warned him of this: that teams will be on to your "schtick" as the season progresses, so better not stray too far off of the line, sonny.

Like the Clint Eastwood line...."a man's GOT to know his limitations".

Just my opinion.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 13th, 2009 at 12:51 AM #3
funkywolve
Joined: 2008-10-08
Points: 147
Offline
Who knows

but Tate doesn't look that comfortable in the pocket. Looks much more comfortable when he's rolling out or scrambling.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 4:28 PM #4
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 2009-06-03
Points: 5173
Offline
Did he really "Go Batshit"?

Did he really "Go Batshit"? I've read this a few times. He yelled at a QB who had made repeated bad decisions, and, trailing by two scores with 7 minutes left in the game, had just taken 2 delay of game penalties with the clock melting away. Tate's a true freshman, and he'll get better, and he'll learn, I have no doubt. But RR has never yelled at kids for just messing up - I imagine the clock management was what infuriated him.

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 5:00 PM #5
Papochronopolis
Papochronopolis's picture
Joined: 2009-09-17
Points: 263
Offline
I agree, I don't really see

I agree, I don't really see what the issue is here. I clearly remember Carr going "batshit" a number of times.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 4:06 PM #6
Darth Vader
Darth Vader's picture
Joined: 2009-10-01
Points: 13
Offline
Fans!

I'd just like to second the overall great Iowa fan experience - not too much hostility like you'd expect from MSU and OSU, where the possibility of getting hit by something is quite high. we tailgated right across the street from one of the big lots (Myrtle lot I believe) and we had nothing but fun with our direct neighbors, who were Iowa alum, and those passing by.

beer, food, and football seemed to make everyone OK with just having a good time. our outfits might have helped some I guess... especially once we got to the stadium. other than 2 points (or some turnovers), it was a fantastic weekend!

"We call it the great Michigan Spirit."

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 3:16 PM #7
WestCoastWolverine
Joined: 2008-10-09
Points: 584
Online
Let's be honest...

this game should've been Michigan's worst nightmare. Near freezing cold, night game, pumped up and liquored up crowd, Iowa's strong defense, etc. I made the pick before the season that Michigan would beat Iowa. Before the game I thought I'd be eating those words big time, to the tune of a 20-point drubbing. After a close 2-point loss, I'm actually quite pleased with the effort. I was not happy with Tate's decisions but this is part of the ups and downs of a true freshman QB. Michigan will get well against Delaware State and I think they'll make amends against PSU for losses to MSU and Iowa.

M is toight

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 3:10 PM #8
ajscipione
Joined: 2009-08-31
Points: 207
Offline
Thanks Brian.

Great journalism as usual, backed up with logic and reason. I'm fairly happy we are 4-2 at this point in the season. I just wish we didn't have that second conference loss. I'm hoping we can knock off either Penn State, Wisconsin, or OSU and maybe end up 9-3 for the season.

AJ Bluefan

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 3:08 PM #9
canderso3
Joined: 2009-08-18
Points: 14
Offline
Storming the field is a "tradition" that Iowa students do...

This "tradition" has been around for a few years. When I was a student at Iowa (2003-2007), the students rushed the field for every win. This included when Iowa beat highly ranked Michigan in 2003, and also when they beat Akron to open the season in 2004. Didn't really matter who the opponent was.

Pretty lame, IMO.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 3:15 PM #10
ajscipione
Joined: 2009-08-31
Points: 207
Offline
I agree. I would...

think it would mean more if they just did it for special wins. At least they don't storm the field when they lose.

AJ Bluefan

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 3:05 PM #11
OMG Shirtless
OMG Shirtless's picture
Joined: 2009-08-16
Points: 1913
Offline
Anyone else notice the

Anyone else notice the Michigan fans that must have been sitting in the Iowa student section that ended up on the field also?

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 3:04 PM #12
SeattleChris
Joined: 2008-09-06
Points: 35
Online
What happened to putting all our eggs in the 2011 basket?

Aren't most of you the same people that were singing that tune in the offseason? Honestly, I think we'll all look back on these two losses as key learning experiences for our Frosh QB's and the rest of the team late in the season and next year. Here is summary of the lesson from Iowa:

1) Tate needs to get more comfortable in the pocket and deliver the ball on the money when he has time, not just when he is running around in sandlot "hero" mode.

2) Denard just flat out needs more passing experience and pressure to understand when to throw the ball away and progress in his reads, his three bad picks all came when he was trying to go downfield and forced it; experience help this, but going from run, run, dink

3) the Defensive coaches are doing all they can to make both scheme and personnel adjustments to put us in a position to win games

4) Coach Rod needs to chill out on the sidelines and demand excellence with more coddling vs. screaming since these two are so young, but that's probably just Rod being a Dick and I don't expect that to change.

5) We are spoiled as hell even though we just had the worst season in recent history everyone now expects this to be Michigan back to its statistical norm. It sucks that we lost two games we had a chance to win, just at it was great that we won two games that we just as easily could've lost. Those wins were huge confidence builders and we will reap the benefits in the future. Yes it sucks that we are 4-2 vs. 6-0 but get over it.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 13th, 2009 at 8:28 AM #13
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 2009-02-18
Points: 1670
Offline
Agree a bit

"1) Tate needs to get more comfortable in the pocket and deliver the ball on the money when he has time, not just when he is running around in sandlot "hero" mode. "

Because Tate is 6'1" it is hard to pass when you are in the pocket. If you noticed during the game he had a few passes batted down whenever he tried throwning from the pocket. I think he completed one and had three knocked down. He is very accurate on the run outside the pocket, I think that is where he does his best work. I don't think there is any need for he or the coaches to restrict him to throwing in the pocket.

"4) Coach Rod needs to chill out on the sidelines and demand excellence with more coddling vs. screaming since these two are so young, but that's probably just Rod being a Dick and I don't expect that to change. "

These are not 10 year old kids we are talking about, they don't need to be hugged and kissed after they screw up IME. Just because a coach gets mad doesn't make him a dick. I coach a few sports and get mad on occasion but don't think it makes me a dick. RR is an intense coach and showed the more coddling side when the screw ups were happening earlier in the season. As the season progresses, so do coaches expectations for their players and thus, the intensity on the sidelines increases. I think his reaction was appropriate given the circumstances.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 13th, 2009 at 3:49 PM #14
SeattleChris
Joined: 2008-09-06
Points: 35
Online
Quick Reply to Yarmouth

1) My point wasn't that the coaches should limit Tate, it's just that when he doesn't break contain, he needs to learn to be comfortable inside the pocket vs. on the run. There were multiple times when Iowa's dline held contain where he had time but had to make a decision from within the pocket and he didn't look comfortable. This is a coaching point where he can improve by either stepping up or moving around in the pocket vs. potentially running outside right into a sack, not that he did this but just a point for improvement. Denard has the same issue. Agree on the point about him being 6'1'' though.

4) Was a bit tongue in cheek but anyone who has played sports knows that after you f-up and know it the last thing you want is some red-faced coach screaming at you, but hey I'd rather have Rod's intensity than the opposite.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 8:25 PM #15
MGoViso
Joined: 2009-09-27
Points: 45
Offline
Totally agreed

I don't quite get some of the pessimism Brian had about the team--despite some pretty poor play at times, we're a couple plays away from undefeated. Of course there's "a long way to go" for serious NC contention, but that's true for all but maybe 5-6 teams out of 120. There's not a long way to go to get back to respectability; as long as M beats the three softies and steals one or two out of three tough games left, everyone will know they're back.
Although whenever I think of "a couple plays away" I also think of that quote from The Mighty Ducks: "Yeah, but six inches the other way and you'd have missed completely."

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 2:29 PM #16
imafreak1
Joined: 2008-07-02
Points: 122
Offline
one question

To all those who are despondent and rapidly reducing their expectations. What was your preseason expectation? I saw everything between 5-7 and 8-4. Michigan is right on target for 7-5 with the same shot they had at 8-4 as they did at the start of the season.

This team is talented and can largely blame themselves for the loses. The QBs and OL have been much better than expected.

What is the problem? You expected Michigan to beat the #12 team on the road?

Loses hurt. And however the lose happens it feels like the hurt is special. It's not. Losing because you turn the ball over 5 times is acres better than losing by 35.

This season has been a resounding success so far. RR has been great. Be happy.

Give it to Wheatley!

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 2:39 PM #17
jonny_GoBlue
jonny_GoBlue's picture
Joined: 2009-09-05
Points: 755
Offline
I disagree...

Losing by 2 after turning the ball over 5 times hurts a whole lot more than losing by 35. I walked away from this one feeling like we could have and probably should have won.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 2:51 PM #18
jmblue
Joined: 2008-11-07
Points: 5565
Online
This type of loss is painful

This type of loss is painful because we were so close, but getting blown out is just an incredibly depressing feeling - confirmation that your team isn't that good. I'd rather take the agonizingly close one.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:23 PM #19
Ernis
Ernis's picture
Joined: 2008-09-23
Points: 1706
Offline
n/a

eh, nevermind

That's right, Dude. 100% certain.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:18 PM #20
Wazoo
Joined: 2008-07-10
Points: 29
Offline
HOLD ON TO THE DAMN BALL

How many others thought of Brian's omission as soon as Mathews botched the punt?

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 4:47 PM #21
TSWC
Joined: 2009-09-08
Points: 39
Offline
Yep

Seriously immediately after the drop I muttered "Dammit, Brian!" Not that I actually think has some magical power or anything.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:12 PM #22
enlightenedbum
Joined: 2009-06-06
Points: 231
Offline
When I went to Iowa in 2003

When I went to Iowa in 2003 (also homecoming) with a group of band friends, it was obvious that the alumni band was far superior to Iowa's normal band. One of the alums who looked to be about 45 even had a snarky shirt on about it.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:09 PM #23
Engin77
Joined: 2008-07-02
Points: 2513
Online
The Time Out

taken third and ten from the one and a half was made by Minor. It looked to me like there was a sideline call which most of the team saw and adjusted to, but Tate did not. Minor called the TO to avoid a busted play and possible turnover or safety. Today's press conference disclosure of Tate's concussion makes this a more likely explanation.

Freep-free since Sept. 1, 2009

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 13th, 2009 at 8:18 AM #24
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 2009-02-18
Points: 1670
Offline
Dude, come on

The concussion occurred on one of the last two plays Tate took part in. This happened well before that.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:53 PM #25
Heisman Epstein
Heisman Epstein's picture
Joined: 2008-07-08
Points: 69
Online
Rushing the field

Did anyone else in attendance find it a little odd that the students rushed the field after the game (albeit very casually)? My thought was: you beat an unranked team in a game in which you were favored. Act like you've been there before. That said, I also "rushed" the field and took a few pictures with my friends. I wondered if this was just a homecoming thing, but the goalposts were taken down by security and guarded. I guess it will end up being Iowa's biggest home game of the year, but still.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 3:03 PM #26
WestCoastWolverine
Joined: 2008-10-09
Points: 584
Online
Fans rushed

the field probably because they felt a little fortunate their Hawkeyes came away with a victory.

M is toight

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:12 PM #27
Other Chris
Other Chris's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 1194
Offline
As Musburger and Herbstreit pointed out repeatedly

Iowa is second to Florida in their unbroken winning streak. So, maybe that is field-rush worthy. Also, after a night game, in the bitter cold, why not rush the field? A little warm up.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:06 PM #28
WichitanWolverine
WichitanWolverine's picture
Joined: 2009-09-30
Points: 525
Offline
Hell Yeah

Love the Hayden Epstein shoutout. Well Done.

Forever remembering 11/22/03.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:37 PM #29
WolverineinTX
Joined: 2009-10-12
Points: 3
Offline
Yakety Sax and other comments

Two things:

1) I feel personally responsible for the turnovers in this game for some reason... A co-worker of mine was listening to ESPN radio here in Dallas and before every Wade Phillips press conference, they play the 'Yakety Sax' song. On Thursday before the game, I heard the song coming from his speakers... I feared that this was a bad omen but tried to forget about it*.

2) Right before Forcier was pulled, I remember the ABC sideline reporter commenting about how on the previous 3 and out, as Tate was coming off the field, RR was pretty frustrated and Forcier's response (according to the sideline reporter) was "I don't know what you want"... If true, this could have prompted RR's decision to sit Forcier (although I wish he would have put him back in with 1:40 left).


*I know that I personally have no ability to affect the outcome of each play, yet I still feel personally responsible.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:38 PM #30
A Case of Blue
A Case of Blue's picture
Joined: 2009-03-22
Points: 863
Offline
Thank you for that factoid,

Thank you for that factoid, which I will now proceed to share with every Cowboys fan I know, just to rub things in a little bit.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:14 PM #31
themoonisdown09
themoonisdown09's picture
Joined: 2009-09-15
Points: 149
Offline
I also got the feeling

I also got the feeling from watching it on ABC that Forier was on the bench because he was being punished. I really hope that's not the case and that he indeed was injured.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 13th, 2009 at 8:15 AM #32
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 2009-02-18
Points: 1670
Offline
I have to say.....what?

You would rather Tate be injured than be sat because he was a little rattled?? Are you serious? Being rattled is to be expected in a game like this, especially for a true frosh. He will get over that and be better for experiencing it. An injury (especially a concussion) is serious many unknown possibilities. To say you were hoping he was injured rather than simply being sat down because he was rattled is beyond insane IME.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:24 PM #33
hailblue
Joined: 2009-09-29
Points: -34
Offline
Brandon Minor Toward the end of the game?

I thought that Minor should have been in there on Michigan's last td drive... When Robinson eventually ran it in for the TD. My friends and I watching the game really wanted some Minor Rage in there to punch it in. Did he get banged up at the end of the game? Was he in the play on that particular TD?

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:31 PM #34
El Jeffe
El Jeffe's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 930
Offline
Would the TD have been worth

Would the TD have been worth more if Minor had scored it? Not sure what your point is here.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:04 PM #35
hailblue
Joined: 2009-09-29
Points: -34
Offline
wow...cocky are we..

My point was i was asking if he was injured? He is the best blocker we have...He should have been in if he was healthy. Of course it doesn't change the out come. I wasn't questioning the coaching. I was concerned that our best player was injured again.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:27 PM #36
El Jeffe
El Jeffe's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 930
Offline
Not cocky, only confused. You

Not cocky, only confused. You stressed the penultimate drive, so it seemed like you thought there was something especially meaningful about his not being in there on that drive.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:07 PM #37
enlightenedbum
Joined: 2009-06-06
Points: 231
Offline
Minor was in (and wide open

Minor was in (and wide open deep) on the Denard INT.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:41 PM #38
dex
dex's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 2374
Offline
ha

Running back TDs count as 9 in the final 7 minutes of road games. It's the bonus round.

great and omniscient Grand Poobah of the WLA

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 1:06 PM #39
bouje
bouje's picture
Joined: 2008-09-30
Points: 1746
Offline
Especially when they haven't let up a rushing TD

in 33 quarters. We got that +8 games no rushing TD's double bonus!

"A house divided against itself cannot stand"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:18 PM #40
mendrygal
mendrygal's picture
Joined: 2009-09-14
Points: 35
Offline
Not Suprising

12 seconds into the game I predicted that Donovan's pick-6 would be our best offensive play. I think it was. I guaranteed a D-Rob pick in the last drive, and agree that he's a 3 minute drive guy, not a 1:40 guy. As bad as Tate's looked in games, he can pull it together in prevent defense time. With 5 turnovers, playing away at a top 15 team, losing by 2 shouldn't feel bad. But it does.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 13th, 2009 at 8:10 AM #41
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 2009-02-18
Points: 1670
Offline
So you're a prophet

I have to say, people who come out and tell everyone how they're predictions were right on the money drive me a little crazy, especially when they only predicted them to themselves.

If you can do simple math you know that UM didn't need drive the length of the field for a TD in 1:40. Couple that with the fact that TF showed just as high an afinity for throwing bad passes in this game that DR has shown in his playing time and I don't see what all the fuss about him playing is about. He made a bad pass and it was picked. What did TF show during this game that gives anyone the confidence that he wouldn't have done the same thing given the chance?

The time was not a huge factor in this case. They needed to get into field goal range and had DR seen Odoms open, he may have gotten them there on that catch with plenty of time to spare. All that is irrelevant now, but lets keep things in perspective, especially when we are implying a proven coach doesn't know how to coach and we do.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:16 PM #42
Drakeep
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 21
Offline
Agreed

As I was walking out of Kinnick all I could think of to say to other M fans was "Don't worry, we're fine." and I believe that.

After what happened last season you have to be encouraged. In our two losses we've been in the games until the end despite be gashed on the defensive side of the ball. That's progress my friends.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 13th, 2009 at 8:01 AM #43
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 2009-02-18
Points: 1670
Offline
I disagree

Saying we were gashed on the defensive side of the ball against MSU is accurate, saying we were against Iowa isn't, IME. Take away those two plays to the TE and we had an excellent game on D IME. The points are mainly a result of the great field position they were given by our numberous turnovers.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:13 PM #44
WichitanWolverine
WichitanWolverine's picture
Joined: 2009-09-30
Points: 525
Offline
Really?

I'm surprised at how somber your tone is after the game. I thought we put up a hell of a fight and felt fairly good despite the loss.

In my opinion, we lost for 4 reasons:

1. Big (short) pass plays. I agree that Williams is likely to blame for these. Specifically, that first Moeaki (sp?) TD should not have gone for so many yards.

2. Turnovers. Self-explanatory. We were simply making a lot of freshman mistakes. Even our seniors (Mathews, ugh).

3. Forcier. Maybe the kid forgot to pack his swagger, but he seemed to have much more time in the pocket than Iowa's D-Line was supposed to give him, and didn't do much with it.

4. Lack of white pants. Kidding, but I was a bit disappointed after all the hype.

I thought we played well other than that. Graham looked great. Kovacs played well, aside from one blown tackle I saw. Minor ran the ball consistently. Overall a good outing, especially our run defense.

I fear, however, that we may find Iowa is not as good as we'd like. I think they're highly overrated, especially with Stanzi at the helm. Similar to ND and Indiana (who got pasted by Virginia over the weekend, yikes).

Forever remembering 11/22/03.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:31 PM #45
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 1976
Offline
If you "fear that Iowa is overrated" then

why would you feel good about the loss? I feel ok myself, but if they do turn out to be worse than believed, as WMU is in addition to Indiana, I would feel worse than now.

MGoBlog "Circle Jerker"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:46 PM #46
WichitanWolverine
WichitanWolverine's picture
Joined: 2009-09-30
Points: 525
Offline
huh?

Iowa is a good team. I am glad we played them tough. But I don't think they deserve their #11 ranking and don't see them contending for a national championship or beating OSU.

Every team we've played so far (except for Iowa) has been shown to be fairly weak. Hopefully Iowa can run the tables and do big things, but I don't see that happening. If Iowa falls apart, which they may, then yes, I would feel worse about this game than I currently do. That's why I said I fear their collapse. I'm not sure I completely follow your question...

Forever remembering 11/22/03.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:49 PM #47
Other Chris
Other Chris's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 1194
Offline
Because a lot of what needs to be fixed is in Michigan's control

Do a few more things right, this is a W. You can see things coming together, the D is improving. So all-in-all, this is not a loss like some last year when you wondered if you'd ever enjoy football again.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:06 PM #48
The FannMan
The FannMan's picture
Joined: 2008-11-25
Points: 465
Offline
"Rohit… Naha… Romin… fromblobololgbogl"

Brian, I often read this blog when I eat lunch. Your description of Iowa's homecoming king's name damn near caused me to choke on my sandwich. Wouldn't you have felt awful!

BTW, I agree with others that you are being a bit too down on the team. It is disappointing b/c this was a winnable game. But, on the other hand, this ended up being a winnable game! That is progress and that is good.

"Ships, shoes, basketballs, whatever," Lucas-Perry said. "We're burning ours first, because we're coming to take theirs. We want it bad."

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:06 PM #49
cjpops
Joined: 2009-09-01
Points: 52
Offline
Still laughing

I'm still laughing at the Black Eyed Peas song. Out loud. In front of my computer screen. That song SUX!

I think Forcier's been hurt much worse than has been let on. His arm was HANGING in the IU game. He's toughed it out for the last few weeks, but, I'm not surprised that he didn't finish the game. Plus, he was underwhelming against Iowa, to be sure.

And, finally: if Denard completes the pass underneath (to Odoms?) instead of launching it downfield, I think UM would've had a shot for a FG to win. Receiver would've caught it at around the UM 45 and had room to run upfield before going OOB.

Let's admit it - we're all spoiled with UM's late heroics this year. I was sure they were going to come back and win again. It can't happen every time.

The big issue on this team is NOT QB. It's defense.

Let Denard Robinson play ALL GAME this Saturday. Let Tate rest and get healthy...

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: October 12th, 2009 at 12:02 PM #50
antidaily
antidaily's picture
Joined: 2009-05-21
Points: 79
Offline
Re:Rohit, the indian bioengineering Homecoming King

After the announcement, the Iowa guy next to me says, "What? Apu is our homecoming king!?" and boo'd him.

It should be noted that roughly 75% of the fans I encountered didn't actually go to school at Iowa.

--
antidaily.com

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.