Rutgers 26, Michigan 24 Comment Count

Seth

at the People's Climate March on Sept. 21 in New York City. (Adam Glanzman)

Adam Glanzman/special to MGoBlog

Human beings, and not just those associated with Michigan, are capable of extraordinary incompetence. The biggest brain fart tonight was when a guy watched Amara Darboh make a catch, take two steps, dive out of bounds, and place the ball on the ground, then “confirmed” it “incomplete.” The call on the field was malpractice; getting it wrong with the benefit of a DVR and HDTV is so staggeringly separated from reality that most fanbases will go for sinister explanations.

A Michigan Man knows better. Watching this program try to manage a clock, manage an offense, or manage a press release is the kind of thorough education in the extent of the human capacity for ineptitude that you’ve come to expect from the nation’s top public university.

“Blame the refs!” explains why Wile had to attempt a 56-yarder—which Rutgers blocked—and why Michigan had just one timeout to throw against a 1st down-and-kneel drive to end the game. It doesn’t explain why Michigan manipulated the clock to leave their opponent a comfortable 120 seconds to drive at the end of the first half. Or why they forgot they had Funchess for two quarters. Or why a heretofore deep and competent secondary gave up 404 yards to Gary Nova, overcoming a record previously held by the John L. Smith Razorbacks.

Michigan stayed in it, partly because Rutgers is Rutgers. Also because Devin Gardner laughed off two tackle attempts en route to a 19-yard 4th quarter touchdown that needs to be put to Autumn Thunder immediately. I feel awful about how this guy’s career has gone. Given the schedule from here, the Wolverines would be lucky to go 6-6 and unlikely to win four. When the team is this bad and the coaches’ meat this dead, we can check out, or just enjoy the occasional exploits of those who won’t.

People are just stupid sometimes; even Unpossible Throw God Gary Nova himself took a false start(!) this game. This will be important to remember whenever it’s time to commence  a headhunt as inevitable as the Big Ten’s empty apology. Humans are only tenuously rational creatures, and as soon as a coaching search commences, all contact with reality is lost.

Comments

SHub'68

October 5th, 2014 at 10:36 AM ^

I kind of figured it didn't much matter at that point.

But to play along, kicking was dumb.  Let's say he makes it and we take a 1 point lead.  There was tons of time left on the clock for Rutgers to get into field goal range.  And we all know they would have (OK, we don't but, yes we do).  So the upside of the field goal was that, assuming he actually pulls it off, you give a kid confidence who is sorely in need of it.  Otherwise, I feel reasonably certain the end result of the game would have been the same.

So say we pull off the unlikely 4th down conversion.  This gives us more chances to eat clock, getsus closer, and opens the possibility that we might actually score a touchdown, forcing Rutgers to do likewise.

Would have went for it.  And actually thought that's what we were going to do.

Knight

October 5th, 2014 at 12:09 AM ^

Not the first time Michigan has gotten screwed on a review. It has happened too much these last few years. Hopefully when (if) we are good again there will be more reviews that go Michigan's way. Missing a call on the field is one thing, but having seemingly obvious replays get called incorrectly is infuriating. Just a crazy run of bad play, bad coaching, and bad luck for the Wolverines.

Djmiller32789

October 5th, 2014 at 12:10 AM ^

To make a move......dropped balls, untimely penalties, missed blocking assignments, breakdowns on defense, turnovers, and bad coaching decisions equals bad coaching! Unfortunately we need to fire Hoke because our next hire must be the right one or Michigan will Start to lose its power! 0-2 since 1967!!!!!!

ThoseWhoStayUofM

October 5th, 2014 at 12:27 AM ^

Look forward to Les Miles in Maize and blue and an athletic director who sees people in the stadium, not numbers with $s in front of them. Michigan men call it as it is. The guy in the booth had money riding on Rutgers. That is the only reasonable explanation.

maracle

October 5th, 2014 at 1:08 AM ^

Well pending any offseason chaos next season we should have even more talent than this season, and this season there's a lot of talent.

 

Which is why the results are so frustrating.  Rich Rod had some bad years where multiple positions didn't have a single guy that should make a two-deep at Indiana.  I could at least sort of understand those years... This team should actually be pretty good.  Fucking that up is why this coaching staff is as good as gone.

ReegsShannon

October 5th, 2014 at 12:19 AM ^

I guess you guys don't watch enough Lions games. They get one of those calls atleast once a year. It's a dumb rule, but you can't blame the refs for calling the rules correctly.

Waxing Gibbous

October 5th, 2014 at 12:25 AM ^

http://cfn.scout.com/2/1317370.html

Rule 2, Section 4, Article 3, paragraph b: If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent) he must maintain complete and continuous control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or in the end zone. This is also required for a player attempting to make a catch at the sideline and going to the ground out of bounds. If he loses control of the ball which then touches the ground before he regains control, it is not a catch. If he regains control inbounds prior to the ball touching the ground it is a catch.

Waxing Gibbous

October 5th, 2014 at 12:34 AM ^

when they changed the rule above to be like the NFL's.

Yes, refs do mess up, but not in this case. The process isn't complete until he is down with control of the ball, or makes a football move.

The refs did get this one right. The ball came out when he landed out of bounds = incomplete pass.

Not that I agree with the rule mind you ... but it IS the rule now.

MGoBlue96

October 5th, 2014 at 12:56 AM ^

He did not fall to the ground during the catch. He caught it, than clearly took two full steps. The dive (which was not a product of the actual catchl) was after he had already established possession by taking two steps. The two steps and dive are 100% football moves, and that is how that play is routinely called in college football.

AnthonyThomas

October 5th, 2014 at 2:39 AM ^

Holy shit do us all a favor and stop digging this hole deeper. You read the rule incorrectly and should probably give up the fight.

It was a catch and the call was wrong. It doesn't change the fact that this team and athletic department are led by an incompetent coach and some soulless, corporate bat creature. 

MGoBender

October 5th, 2014 at 10:10 AM ^

I was watching the game with two college refs.  I made the same argument you guys are making (he took two steps!  he dove forward!) and they both knew it was going to be upheld as incomplete before the review.

The rule is broken.  The correctly refs applied the shitty rule.  As my friends said, if there was wiggle room, they booth guy would have ruled a catch because OBVIOUSLY JUST WATCH THE PLAY AND USE YOUR BRAIN.  But the way the rule is written, it was incomplete.

RobSk

October 5th, 2014 at 1:22 AM ^

just 100% wrong.

The reason they kept using the words 'athletic move' is because that described what Darboh did after he caught the ball, took two steps, turned his body and dove for the first down marker. There is simply no possible way to suggest that he was still in the process of catching the ball, as the referee who was standing 5 feet away and staring right at the play would agree, since he called it a first down and a catch. Only the guy 30 yards away who was on the other side of Darboh's body could possibly think anything else.

      Rob

Sopwith

October 5th, 2014 at 1:49 AM ^

he was not going down in the act of catching the ball-- he was going down in the act of running with a ball that he already possessed.  If he dived, caught the ball with clear possession, and the ball then came loose after hitting the ground, it's incomplete despite earlier possession.  But that's not what happened here.

Sopwith

October 5th, 2014 at 1:48 AM ^

The Calvin Johnson calls against the Lions were the correct call because in those cases, the player was going to the ground in the act of catching the ball.  Darboh wasn't; he had clear possession while upright and dived out of bounds, stretching the ball ahead of him, which then came loose upon hitting the ground.  But the catch was completed-- he was running-- so there was no need to stretch "completion" to the point where he hit the ground.

littlebrownjug

October 5th, 2014 at 12:25 AM ^

Michigan's running game was better than what I saw all of last year, and it seemed like Mattison just had a really tough night. Rutgers' OC took advantage of him, and they are just going to have to accept that not enough pressure is generated by this front to play aggressive on the corner. Also, the safeties were atrocious.

For such a small stadium, it was suprised how loud it was. Generally, the fans were respectful, and I enjoyed the experience. It was criminal that Michigan did not bring its band, as there would have been plenty of room for them in either corner opposite the corner, and we did not even bring a small pep band. That is a major failure for the AD given how many Michigan alumni live in the NYC area.

The MSU game will be ugly.

bostonsix

October 5th, 2014 at 12:26 AM ^

Its freaking Rutgers! What in all honesty does a blown call make? If Rutgers can move the ball at their own will, and stuff us on defense for most of the game what in all honesty would a piss poor win "hypothetically " make? One more chance for Hoke? A glimmer of hope for the rest of the season? This is all just one big joke.

MGoBlue96

October 5th, 2014 at 1:02 AM ^

Officials and replay officials have a job to do like anybody else.They don't get a fucking pass because a team deserved it or left themselves vunerable. Yes, we all aware of the shitty job the coaching staff has done and that the pass defense was awful to night, but that doesn't mean a horribly botched call that occured on a crucial drive in a 2 point game shouldn't be talked about.

bostonsix

October 5th, 2014 at 2:44 AM ^

Than the two other blown calls by the reffs that was in our favor? Pass interference thrown by the sideline judge 20 yards behind the play, and the missed Facemask by Taco resulting in a punt from there end zone, makes up for that crappy call. And, I bet there are zero players in that locker room blaming the loss on that one bad call. We had plenty of opportunities to get ahead in the game prior to the "last drive". Its ridiculous to claim that the players probably feel cheated because of the bad officiating.