Run Field Throw Hit Pitch: Softball vs Florida, and Baseball vs the Future Comment Count

Seth

pizzasoftball

What: Softball in Game 1 of the Championship (best of 3) Series
When: Tonight, 8 ET
Where to watch: ESPN2 or WatchESPN
Line: There are two, one down each foul line. What?

Preview: Florida is good at softball. They won the national championship last year, beat Michigan 2-1 at the start of this season when Michigan was mercy-ing everyone else, and rolled through the rest. They were the #1 seed with gusto, and beat Tennessee and LSU by a combined 11-2 before having some difficulty dispatching rival-like-thing Auburn 3-2 in extra innings. Like Michigan they are mentally tough as nails.

Lauren Haeger is their pitcher and if you put her on any team they might be where Florida is. She beat out the greatest player in Michigan softball history for the player of the year award and might have deserved to. If Sierra Romero is Miguel Cabrera: softball edition, Haeger is Babe Ruth if Ruth pitched every day. She had a .678 slugging and a 1.24 ERA, averaging a strikeout per inning. I don't have to show you a photo; if you tune in your lizard instincts will immediately recognize the threat.

Ringing the Bell

We also say adieu to baseball. I have two fandoms that predate memory: Tigers and Michigan football. I got on the Red Wings bandwagon about the time Cheveldae was the hot backup we all wanted to start, and Michigan basketball with the '89 run, trading that in for hockey when I got to college because 1998-2002 duh. Pistons were and remain a team I'm into when they're good—other than that I keep myself conversant on Steph Curry etc. because America cares. I keep a peripheral knowledge of other things in case something beeps.

Last month Michigan Baseball beeped.

16894331289_917f38df46_b

An average team in a suddenly average league this year, Michigan was out of the bubble unless it could sweep its way into an auto-bid through the Big Ten tourney. This they did, taking out then #4 Illinois in the third of a four-game tournament.

If the alarm made an intelligible sound it was "Carmen Benedetti", Michigan's own Ruth-like object, though he only pitched 14 innings (and tallied 23 strikeouts in them). Benedetti hit .352 and led the team in power numbers from 1st base.

I'd like it if someone else wrote the epitaph on this team because I missed most of the fun; this week I watched the two Louisville games and missed the two against Bradley. L'ville was the host team so I got to see Michigan lose while getting boo'ed. They looked likely to steal the first one until the last inning when right fielder Johnny Slater dove to catch a foul ball with less than two outs and the game-winer ready to tag from 3rd. The second game was a blowout.

Bakich has them headed in the right direction and this year was certainly a step that way. It may have been the tourney taste that basketball got when they surprised Clemson then ran at Blake Griffin until Blake Griffin was like "you are Zak Novak!" If you look at the Wikipedia entry for Beilein's first team it's short and mentions Manny Harris. If you look at the second one there are individual game recaps and memes like "Queme los Barcos!" This team felt like that team.

Softball recap: You were alive for this.

I didn't get into Michigan softball until it was nearly too late—the summer after graduation while I was still hanging around Ann Arbor and umpiring the IM level of it. That was the Marissa Young team, with a young Jessica Merchant and Nicole Motycka on it. Young was the draw; you knew when watching her that you were seeing one of the greats. She'd do things like pitch a no-hitter in the first frame of a double-header, then hit two home runs in the second game.

It was so much fun. Unless you were around for the 19-teens or shortly thereafter (i.e you are Craig Ross) you have no idea how much of a blast it is to go to a ballpark and defy every somber convention baseball's built up since. They would sing at bat music for each other. They would hurl insults at the other bench. They had pepper cheers and everyone came out to greet home runs. Nobody knew what the limit could be so everyone showed up for the Big Ten championship game with MSU; they lost it.

Two years ago they adopted a kid. Not legal-adopted—they just had a little girl they adored so they put her on the team. That was the team with Wagner and Driesenga, and the more raw versions of this team's stars. It wasn't like they went away in the interim—Michigan softball has been an elite program for longer than I've followed it; Hutchins was an heir apparent assistant here when Harbaugh was the quarterback. But again you got that otherworldly talent vibe, especially from Wagner. Megan Betsa's commitment was a huge deal.

The Year of the Pizza

17162203663_6af3712182_k

Fuller

Like before, this team has been building over years and picked up fans in its swell. It has the pizza theme and Sierra Romero (and she has another year!) already puts Denard out of the conversation for greatest Michigan athlete of the decade. It marches to the beat, literally—she starts a beat and they all dance to it—of Lauren Sweet, the most catcher catcher in the history of the tools of ignorance.

I dunno do you really need to know how they beat up on UCLA (the Duke of the sport) and a bunch of SEC powerhouses, how this 'Ship series was ordained movie-style when Michigan opened the season against all-business, defending champion Florida and got thoroughly beat despite the closeness of the score? Do you really need a narrative, or unbelievable statistics, or any of the other accoutrements we pump into sports to keep them lively when they're not? Here's the softball update: they play incredible softball with incredible irreverence. Enjoy the game.

Comments

Wolverine Devotee

June 1st, 2015 at 6:27 PM ^

Small correction: there is no h in Nicole Motycka's last name.

Just wait until you see how many records--team and individual--have been set this season. I'll be doing a post on them once the season ends since there's certainly a long, long list of them. 

Gucci Mane

June 1st, 2015 at 6:38 PM ^

Is it frowned upon to comment on the looks of some of the players ? Let's just say when you want to compare stats between Lauren hager and Sierra Romero, there's a substational difference you spot right away.

NotADuck

June 1st, 2015 at 7:43 PM ^

While it isn't frowned upon to comment on the looks of players (positively), it is frowned upon to compare and contrast them.  It's standing in a hallway and giving every girl who walks by a 1 to 10 ratiing based solely on their appearance.

That's high school stuff buddy.  Last time I checked this is softball, not a beauty contest.  Let's leave things like that to immature 14-year-olds.

justingoblue

June 2nd, 2015 at 3:44 PM ^

Sadly there's no way I would rank Denard "best" but he was a first team AA, won the Silver Football as B1G MVP and held the NCAA QB rushing record among other various Big Ten and Michigan records. He was also second team All-B1G and honorable mention AA in 2011 and honorable mention All-B1G in 2012.

The distinction should be between individual and team sports. Romero is absolutely in the discussion for team sports and would probably get my vote if we're talking 2005-present.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denard_Robinson#College_honors_and_awards

Wolverine Devotee

June 1st, 2015 at 7:32 PM ^

I'm sorry but that's BS.

Trey was here for two years, Denard didn't win a championship of any kind and Hunwick didn't dominate a sport. And I love all three of those guys.

I've watched Romero's entire career. Every game and track+compile stats after every game. She has broken nearly every single Michigan career record and her junior season isn't even over yet.

She came in as a Freshman, to a national powerhouse program that dominates its conference yearly, and set the single season home run record.

She has a chance to be the only 4-time All-American in program history next year and will most likely win National Player of the Year. 

She is feared by every single team that plays against her. You can see it when she goes up to bat.  

By the time she is done here, she'll have more rings than fingers and will have more team and individual hardware than the three athletes mentioned above combined.

Seth

June 1st, 2015 at 9:16 PM ^

I didn't say Romero moved Trey out of the conversation. I said she moved Denard out. I wouldn't have Hunwick in there either, and since I can't believe he didn't win the Hobey Baker I have to remove Porter too. If we're doing this:

  • Trey Burke: Naismith, let team to nat championship game as soph, left for NBA
  • Romero: Set every hitting record at M, much improved infielder was iffy now B-plus, 2nd in PoY as junior, one year left.
  • Sam Mikulak: 35 individual titles, led M to nat championships in '13 and '14

Can't tell what would have been with 4 years of Burke but can't credit him for it either. Mikulak has to win this by any measure that I'd include Romero in.

J.

June 1st, 2015 at 9:49 PM ^

I suppose it depends upon your defintion of "greatest."  I choose "largest impact upon the university, team, and fanbase."

Sorry, but President Obama is unlikely to ask if Sierra Romero is in the audience the next time he's in Ann Arbor.  Denard Robinson shone in front of millions of people.  Sierra shines in front of tens or hundreds of thousands.  Denard broke his share of Michigan records as well, and his star power outshines his lack of Heisman trophies.  (And if he'd had better coaching on better teams... good gracious).

I don't mean to take anything away from the accomplishments of the softball team, but it remains a niche sport.  If Michigan were to add a couple of additional swimming and diving national championships, it wouldn't make their star swimmer greater than Denard, who -- almost singlehandedly -- gave us all a reason to believe in Michigan football during its darkest hours in the past ~40 years.

mchicagoblue

June 1st, 2015 at 9:23 PM ^

Denard won a Sugar Bowl. And Denard never had a team around him as good as what Romero has. He also never had a coach as good as Hutch.

And I can't hold it against Trey that he was only at Michigan for two years. Good players move on to the next level. That's just how the sport works. There is no next level for softball like the NBA.

Wolverine Devotee

June 2nd, 2015 at 12:39 AM ^

I think that would be dumbing down our standards.

"Those Who Stay Will Be Champions"

Bo talked about how he never had a 4-year class that didn't win the Big Ten.

If you want to count a bowl victory as a championship, then I guess it's just a matter of interpretation of the word championship.

Again, I celebrated that bowl win like a crazy man. That was a thrilling season. Love all three of those guys. Probably my favorite three guys that I have watched play in each of those sports.

But Sierra Romero is simply in a different class. 

J.

June 1st, 2015 at 6:54 PM ^

Sorry, hurling insults is not something I choose to celebrate.


Given that there is an NCAA softball tournament, Michigan may as well win it.  (Go Blue!) But, their team should be held to the same standards as any one else representing Michigan.  Michigan means sportsmanship, class, and doing things the right way -- Beilein, not Calipari, and Bo, not Jimmy Johnson.  Michigan does not mean taunting the opponent.

And the team could win the next four national championships and nobody from those teams will ever come close to Denard.  Sorry, that's just football at Michigan. :-)

NotADuck

June 1st, 2015 at 7:34 PM ^

Softball benches are basically their own student section.  I don't see the problem with a few mild jabs at your opponent every now and then.  Anyone who actually gets offended by that sort of thing needs a reality check.  Lighten up a little, buddy.  Life is more fun that way.  :)

dragonchild

June 1st, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

Unless you were around for the nineteen-teens or shortly thereafter you have no idea how much of a blast it is to go to a ballpark and defy every somber convention baseball's built up since.

I don't live in A2 so unfortunately I can't partake in these festivities but I had a similar experience in HS.  Our boys' basketball team was drawing all the attention with talent, expectations & a good coach.  To call the girls' team an "afterthought" would've been flattery.  But the starting PG on the boys' team had a leetle sister, and she practiced against. . . the starting PG of the talented boys' team.  Against local girls' talent, she was impossible to stop.  She wasn't a great shooter, but there wasn't a defense in the region that could keep her from running the offense.  And our center?  Undersized at 5'10", but she was a fierce lady, and she would out-muscle girls 2-3" taller than her for rebounds.  Watched by a small pep band about 2 dozen strong, the JV cheerleaders and about a hundred parents & fans, they quietly won games.  They made the regionals.  They kept winning, and made the state tourney.

During the run the team, the cheerleaders, the band and the crowd were the closest-knit sporting experience I'd ever enjoyed in my life.  Everyone went to watch the boys' run, so the only ones who watched the girls wanted to be there.  No miracle ending, unfortunately.  In the state tourney they faced bigger, quicker teams and exited in back-to-back losses, but I was proud of their effort.  Other sports moments were more exciting -- some games I've played in, or watching the '97 football team as a student.  But those games meant more to me, as a person, than watching the greater achievements of athletes I've never interacted with.  I envy M's softball fans.  They're getting the best of both worlds.

rob f

June 1st, 2015 at 7:39 PM ^

When it comes to understanding the attitude of fun that is Michigan Softball, you get it, unlike "J."   I've been a fan of baseball and softball for a long time; while I love competition and love both sports, softball is just more "fun".  That fact was never more obvious than this past weekend, as the juxtaposition of the two sports (Michigan Baseball/Michigan Softball) displayed.

And "J.", I don't mean that as any kind of derogatory comment towards you,  but those insults you complain about are in fun and but a small part of the overall attitude of fun and "incredible irreverence" Seth wrote of so well.  You might not see it or appreciate it, but part of the fun of watching women's softball vs. watching men's softball is that you eventually come to the realization that the players on the field don't have to treat it as a somber life-or-death experience at the expense of being ultra -competitive.  Those girls are every bit as competitive as the men of Michigan sports; they just thrive better within the framework of having no framework to encumber them.

I'll put the comparison this way, if it helps:   Fans at  MLB ballparks all over the country are rabid fans of their teams.  But other than slight differences from ballpark to ballpark overall, they are more the same than different across the country from ballpark to ballpark---with one exception:  the fans who go to Oakland A's games.   Those fans aren't just rabid fans, they're rabid ANIMALS !   Maybe its not the perfect comparison, but that "A's" attitude, to me, is very similar to the attitude of fun and "incredible irreverance" that Seth speaks of and that I see when I watch Michigan Softball. 

J.

June 1st, 2015 at 9:37 PM ^

No offense taken, and you may be right that the insults are intended to be "in fun."  I simply don't find that relevant.  In my mind, there are standards for sportsmanship.  Michigan is far from perfect -- Nik Stauskas brushed the line, and maybe even crossed it once or twice.  Mike Hart's "little brother" comment was probably across the line as well, and I saw Chris Perry come and taunt the Oregon student section before putting up 26 yards in a 31-27 loss.  Insulting the other team, whether in jest or not, obliterates that line, espeically when it's done during the game in earshot of the fans.

I don't have a problem with having fun -- Denard has fun; Mitch McGary has fun -- but I have a problem with showing disrespect to the opposition.  I understand that "talking trash" is -- unfortunately -- considered par for the course for many sports today, men's and women's alike. But it is unsportsmanlike -- a sportsman will let his play speak for him and treat his opponent with respect.  To cheer this unsportsmanlike behavior is to endorse it, and I will not.  The coaches on Michigan's softball staff have a responsibility to their players to teach them how to have fun without denigrating their opponent.

Michigan can, and should, be better than the type of behavior described in this post.

Seth

June 1st, 2015 at 10:45 PM ^

"Sporstmanlike" is a term that should have been retired in 1870, which is about the time that various aristocracies realized they couldn't remain the only people allowed to play the sports they came up with.

That and children's sports. If I'm coaching a team up through high school JV I agree with you.

Understand the point of trash talk: it raises the competitive level by raising the stakes and how badly you want to beat the other guy. You say something you are honor bound to back that up. You get said to, you are honor bound to step up. Pride is fed to the beast that is winning.

There are levels of sport where you shouldn't sacrifice pride or raise the level of competition. I don't want high school freshman ballers ruining their shoulders for life for freshman ball, and kids that age are not mature enough to properly channel their emotions. The older the players get and the higher the level of competition, the more it's appropriate.

And you're not going to get rid of it. Kids my age grew up on the Fab Five and the Bad Boys, and we'd go out on the cracked asphalt every recess and say horrible things to each other because we were 10-year-old boys following our social coding to compete.

But at highly competitive levels, whining about sportsmanship for jeering is just that.

"Sporstmanship" can still be applicable but "ethics" means the same thing. You don't intentionally injure another player, for example. 

TreyBurkeHeroMode

June 2nd, 2015 at 3:31 PM ^

Fans at MLB ballparks all over the country are rabid fans of their teams. But other than slight differences from ballpark to ballpark overall, they are more the same than different across the country from ballpark to ballpark---with one exception: the fans who go to Oakland A's games. Those fans aren't just rabid fans, they're rabid ANIMALS ! Maybe its not the perfect comparison, but that "A's" attitude, to me, is very similar to the attitude of fun and "incredible irreverance" that Seth speaks of and that I see when I watch Michigan Softball.

It's also the difference between soccer fans and soccer supporters. The fomer is a somewhat passive "Yay team, good job!" spectating, and the other is wholehearted engagement in the game and attempting to influence the outcome by channeling passion to your team while knocking the other team off their game by (virtually) whatever means necessary.

Mgotri

June 1st, 2015 at 7:14 PM ^

Growing up in Ann Arbor, my best friend's dad would coming home from work and take us to baseball games in the late eighties early nineties. Being kids, we would run around the outside of outfield fence. As the years went on we made it over to alumni more and more. This all culminated when, as freshmen at Michigan, we went to more softball games than baseball games. With that said. This is the best team I have seen. I love watching them every game



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

NotADuck

June 1st, 2015 at 7:28 PM ^

That last paragraph could cynically be interpreted as "I don't know much about this team other than the basics and the game is hours away so I'm going to wing it and hope you are at least a little inspired to watch."

Well Seth, consider me inspired.  A job well done sir, I salute you.  :)

Seth

June 1st, 2015 at 8:26 PM ^

Ironically I wrote that paragraph first. The Florida preview was the last bit I hurriedly typed without thoroughly scouting.

Baseball fandom kind of wore me out on the minutiae of game to game events. This person or that person coming through in a big moment is relevant to that person but not to future events. The exception is an exceptional play, like several that LSU's centerfielder made during the WCWS before facing M, and Sierra Lawrence getting around on a tough pitch to score the winning two, then having the heads-up to steal home while LSU was napping.

PublicSector

June 1st, 2015 at 10:32 PM ^

I'm no softball expert, and obviously in an attempted double play a runner on third scores 100% of the time (at least in baseball), but with runners on 3rd and 1st with no out (and 1 out and 2 out) - why not have the runner at 1st attempt to steal? The pitcher is throwing "rise balls" six, seven feet high and the catcher has already sent one into center field. If she's out you still have the tying run at third. If she's safe - winning run in scoring position. And in THE MOST LIKELY CASE the defense screws it up the tying run scores and the winning run is at least at second.

M-Dog

June 2nd, 2015 at 11:24 AM ^

Sierra Romero (and she has another year!)

I forgot about that.  I'm so used to the idea that every great player leaves school early, that I just assumed she was gone at the end of the season.  But this reminded me that not everything in D1 sports is a cynical pit stop on the way to the dollas.

 

CR

June 2nd, 2015 at 7:49 PM ^

...writing, Seth.

I am happy to see the attention being paid to the game and that you have really captured the feel of it.

Also very happy to see a Marissa Young reference. Fine hitter, better at first base and even better on the mound; best change I have ever seen.