Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 23 hours ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 day ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 days ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 6 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,479 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,071 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,064 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 1,022 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 838 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 33 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 31 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 15 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 6-18-13
    Ace - 10 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • MLIVE per ESPN: Derrick Green "Future Star"
    10 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    37 replies
  • OT - US soccer players who play for foreign countries
    22 replies
  • OT: GIF Tourney IV
    17 replies
  • CIC to Consider Starting Own Coursera-like System, BTN-style
    12 replies
  • MgoUser Crystal Ball Picks
    53 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo: Early Returns & Gripes
    46 replies
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    12 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    41 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    37 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    65 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    112 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    31 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    25 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    13 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT - US soccer players who play for foreign countries
    22 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    37 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo: Early Returns & Gripes
    46 replies
  • MLIVE per ESPN: Derrick Green "Future Star"
    10 replies
  • MgoUser Crystal Ball Picks
    53 replies
  • OT: GIF Tourney IV
    17 replies
  • CIC to Consider Starting Own Coursera-like System, BTN-style
    12 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    41 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    37 replies
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    12 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    77 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    31 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    65 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    13 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    112 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    112 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • John U. Bacon on the GA Student Section
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    77 replies
  • Cornwell to Bama
    76 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Why some corners can't play zone coverage

    i find this extremely interesting

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-Urban Meyer not on the Bo Schembechler-Woody Hayes level, Hoke says, pointlessly because who would believe it was

    i may have altered the title

    0 comments
  • Police: Man arrested for masturbating while riding bike through The Diag

    i thought this was america

    0 comments
  • Miami fans leave Game 6 early, miss incredible ending

    like I said on twitter: that was almost as intense as Iowa NIT games

    0 comments
  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Robinson And Guildenstern Are Dead

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — November 22nd, 2010 at 1:08 PM — 181 comments
Filed under:
  • 2010 wisconsin
  • game columns
  • greg robinson's stuffed beaver
  • jeremy gallon
  • onside kicks
  • rich rodriguez

11/20/2010 – Michigan 28, Wisconsin 48 – 7-4, 3-4 Big Ten

wisconsin-touchdown

Detroit News

During my illustrious high school quiz bowl career* I ran across a question about Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, the Tom Stoppard play about a couple of bit players in Hamlet. It started off "the first 47 words of this play are 'heads,'" at which point someone else rang in and answered. Later I'd find out via the miracle of DVR that the reason the first 47 words of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead are "heads" is because one of the characters flips a coin over and over again. It always comes up heads. Rosencrantz or Guildenstern—it's unclear who is who for the duration—arrives at the conclusion that they are "within un-, sub-, or supernatural forces."

This weekend I'm scanning the message board for threads to terminate with extreme prejudice when I run across something from Mgrowold about the events of Saturday's second half:

Wisconsin then proceeded to run the ball 32 out of 33 times in the second half of today's game.  As I sat in the stadium it occurred to me that if a running play was "heads" and a passing play was "tails" then the Badger's play calling went something like this: heads, heads, tails, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads and then heads.

Wikipedia describes Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead as an "absurdist, existentialist tragicomedy." This is Greg Robinson rubbing a beaver on Kenny Demens's face in the midst of a game where the Michigan defense gave up 560 yards and Scott Tolzien's only incompletion was a James Rogers interception, his third in two games:

At this point the column writes itself.

-----------------------------------------

Apparently this is not literally true and now I have to put words down.

This is disappointing; you always hope if you really, really nail it in the first couple paragraphs you can watch the words appear as if by magic and then you won't have to seriously think about what happened in a game where Wisconsin punted once for the second consecutive year. Not accurate.

Obviously that was awful. Michigan had no answer to Wisconsin's series of basic "hai guys we're Wisconsin" runs. They went back to the same stupid 3-3-5 with Kenny Demens lined up two inches from his nose tackle's butt that got Michigan obliterated against Penn State. Wisconsin's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern second half was immensely, grindingly depressive but did have a secondary effect: it mostly absolved the improbably young secondary from blame. The front seven/eight aren't universally freshmen and should be able to hold a team under, I don't know, 350 yards of rushing.

I said my bit on the job status of Rodriguez and Robinson already. Michigan put up 28 that would have been 31 if not for a missed 30 yard field goal. That's on par with Wisconsin's worst performances of the year—Michigan State put up 34 but got a punt return touchdown, Iowa put up 30. The defense was the same incoherent mess it's been the whole year. It was more depressing than I expected, but at this point whatever, right?

Saturday reinforced both positions. Our defensive coordinator literally rubs small stuffed animals on people's faces. Denard Robinson broke the I-A record for rushing yards by a quarterback and is the first guy in history to have 1500 rushing yards and 2500 passing yards in the same season. Michigan is the most dichotomous team in at least the last decade of college football, and while I won't be horribly upset if Rodriguez does get the axe I still think the best thing for the next year or two is to see what happens when Denard Robinson is an upperclassman and the defense isn't starting four freshmen and three more sophomores. Michigan did manage to achieve the modest goals set before it, albeit in unimpressive fashion.

-----------------------------------------

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are boyhood friends of Hamlet summoned to a castle undergoing chaos. They've got no idea what's going on, are used as pawns, stumble around cluelessly, and end up hanging by their necks until they are dead. Woefully underprepared and doomed from the start, their deaths are both unfair and unavoidable. The third act is set on the boat they take to England and their deaths; they discover the letter sent with them says to execute Hamlet, then discover the Hamlet's fateful switch.

Much of the last bit is devoted to a discussion of how the pair can be so important as to necessitate their execution. I wonder if that's how Rodriguez felt as he watched the half of his team he delegates to someone else ground into a fine dust, like Jeff Casteel had switched his defense with one that read "execute this man."

*(We were actually pretty good, the Wisconsin/Iowa of Michigan high school quiz bowl at the time. We'd own most teams we played but would consistently lose close games to Salem, CC, DCD, and a Henry Ford Harrison team that had lucked into the National Geography Bee winner. We prided ourselves on not having uniforms, at least.)

Existentialist, Absurdist, Tragicomic Non-Bullets

Jeremy Gallon special teams error limit: determined. It is ten billion. I'm obviously on the tolerant side of the scale when it comes to coaching errors (outside of obvious game theory errors, about which I have an Al Qaeda level of zealotry) but JESUS GOD RICH RODRIGUEZ WHY DID YOU LET JEREMY GALLON RETURN KICKS AND PUNTS FOR TEN GAMES.

On the bright side, Michigan's kick returns finally seemed like a net positive aside from the Gallon fumble. Which aaaaargh. The strange thing about those returns was that Wisconsin seemed to be putting them exactly where they wanted—right along one sideline—and still gave up big returns seemingly every time.

A note on how meaningless the NCAA's official kick return stats are: in one game Michigan went from a horrendous debacle to essentially average. They're 67th now. I'll ping Brian Fremeau for his fancy stats at the end of the year to see what the actual damage was in the kick return game.

Small move towards Pulaski. Hey: surprise onside kick that absolutely should have worked but for two Michigan players whiffing on opportunities to recover. Since Wisconsin was going to score anyway, the only tactical error was not doing this two additional times. Also, the last one was not a surprise but it was beautifully executed by the kicker. Maybe that's what they've been practicing all year.

If Roy Roundtree drops a sure first down the next pass will be batted skyward and intercepted 15 yards behind the line of scrimmage. Fact. Please stop doing this, Roy.

First half struggles. The offense didn't score in the first half due to a confluence of events. Event the second: field goal kicker durrr combined with coaching durrrr about the field goal kicker durrrrr. Event the first and many other bits: Robinson couldn't throw straight. Wisconsin shoved guys up to the LOS and dared Michigan to throw deep. Michigan threw deep. Robinson missed guys by yards and yards, including an open Vincent Smith on that third and six that eventually led to field goal durrrr.

In the second half Robinson hit a series of bombs, forced Wisconsin to back off, and Michigan went TD, TD, TD, fate induced post-Roundtree INT, TD. Again, the design of the offense is excellent and while Robinson's lack of accuracy is now an established issue this level of performance with two seniors on the field is remarkable.

God, this was awful. I hate to embed this and inflict it on the public at large, but this was awwwwwful:

I'm actually a fan of Old Hat Creative's work with Michigan's hype videos but Notre Dame fans would laugh at this treacly debacle. Athletic department: I will write sentimental stuff with 10% of the schmaltz for free. I will pay you if this is the alternative. Guh.

Things that were good. A fond farewell to drum major David Hines Jr., whose backbend will remain legendary, and various other band seniors. The MMB bounced back from a year in which they forced Carl Grapentine to say "the clown who laughs outside as he cries inside" and deployed a series of accessible halftime shows that did not involve various operas of the 19th century. The Wizard of Oz halftime was good, Lady Gaga translates to marching band in a shockingly effective fashion, and the hockey band just played the old Hockey Night in Canada theme. Thumbs up.

Bret Bielema: still a huge jerk. This isn't a surprise from a guy who saw one of his special teams scrubs attempt to injure Steve Breaston and then pretended it didn't even happen, but Bret Bielema said his team sent "a message" by chop-blocking one of Michigan's linemen on that first-half drive that didn't end in a touchdown. You know, that one.

Elsewhere

Michigan Exposures with a bunch of pictures, including the random F-15E wandering around the stadium before kickoff, a panoramic shot, and:

  • Pregame
    banner-touch
  • Game
    slippery-rock
  • Postgame
    art-deco-m

I should start regularly linking Mike DeSimone's comprehensive picture galleries, which collect everything shot on a game-by-game basis and act as a crutch here.

I made this facial expression at the exact same time!

Joe Stapleton says he feels sorry for Rodriguez. On RR's postgame mini-rant about the exceptional youth in the secondary:

It's an excuse and reality. As much as I would like to say it, the biggest problem with the defense isn't the abjectly awful coaching of defensive coordinator Greg Robinson (Though it certainly doesn't help — as gaudy as Wisconsin's offensive numbers were, they could have been a lot worse if the Badgers would've taken advantage of the WIDE-open middle of the field through the air). It's the youth in the secondary.

Some say, without thinking, that this is Rodriguez's fault. He should've recruited more (and better) defensive backs. Here's the thing: he had defensive backs. They all just kinda ... left. That, or they got injured.

I'm at the point where losing Vlad Emilien, no matter how not good he may have been, is a strike against you, but by in large most of the departures were ordained like a post-Roundtree drop INT. Wojo's column is along the same lines as this one.

AnnArbor.com runs a poll of their own about RR's job security; the ones run around here earlier in the year by The White Tiger are more extensive but MGoBlog actively discourages people from the militant wing of the fanbase from participating so the numbers at AA.com are probably more representative. They've got 3300 votes in with 41% saying boot him, 22% saying "one more year," and 33% saying "I support him." A very strange 2% of people took the time to vote "I don't care." That's a majority saying keep him but it's vastly short of the 81% who voted "keep him" at 7-5 in the poll around these parts. (Michigan had yet to play Illinois and Purdue when that poll was deployed.)

Across various blogs the reaction seems to be mostly "not surprised." Touch The Banner:

This is a game that I expected Michigan to lose.  Almost everyone did.  That's not to say that I wasn't frustrated by some of the things that the coaches and players did - and the offensive production in the first half was somewhat embarrassing - but ultimately, this outcome is what most educated observers foresaw.

TTB does say the constant use of Vinopal as a blitzer was stupid, which yeah. Burgeoning Wolverine Star:

Wisconsin is that good. It's not surprising, then, that Michigan struggled so mightily against an oversized, veteran unit that is unquestionably the best outfit in the Big Ten. That doesn't make Michigan's complete inability to stop the run or their general defensive incompetence any less disappointing, but it does mitigate it somewhat.

Mets Maize:

My prediction--Wisconsin 45-28--and similar ones around the blogosphere was closer than the Vegas spread (-4.5 Wisconsin). We knew we were outmatched, plain and simple. Too many things had to go our way and JJ Watt's self-tip and pick was not one of them. The disparity between Wisconsin's physicality and Michigan's, uhhh, collection of 18-year-old biceps was worlds apart. I'm sort of glad the game flew by.

The Hoover Street Rag busts out Jefferson's inaugural address in a plea for people who think one side or the other of the Rodriguez debate is full of idiots. MGoFootball peruses the board for choice bits.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:14 PM | Bielema joins... (Score:1)
Yard Dog
Yard Dog's picture
Joined: 10/07/2009
MGoPoints: 163

one Mr. Danny Hope as eternal coaching douchebags.  I think I have to now put Bielema in the lead, as he will last longer at Wisky than Hope will at Purdue, and I'm looking for a real long term hate affair.  Looks like I have my wish.

"I am delighted to have you play football. I believe in rough, manly sports."
 - Theodore Roosevelt

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:16 PM | I posted here a week or so ago, that Bielema was my least (Score:1)
champswest
champswest's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 2017

favorite Big Ten coach.  Maybe, least favorite in all of the land.  He always seems to be on the least noble side of any controversy, and he seems to find himself in a lot of them.

"I hate losing more than I like winning." - Zack

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:15 PM | The unexpected (Score:1)
Yostal
Yostal's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2786

I never thought I would see an assessment of late 1990s Michigan high school quiz bowl as a footnote anywhere on football blog, but there it was, and it was spot on.

Hated losing to CC.  I was pretty darn good in an era where you could be pretty darn good without any real effort, and I hated losing to those guys.

Craig Barker || The Hoover Street Rag || Twitter

"The Michigan fanbase: a cynical, Eeyorish bunch even in the best of times."

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:38 PM | CC '91 here.  The uniforms (Score:1)
Jebus
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 246

CC '91 here.  The uniforms were not my idea, but we were pretty good.

You may resume your unbreakable faith in David Brandon's pimp hand.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 6:20 PM | pictures! (Score:1)
peg dash fab
peg dash fab's picture
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 119

pictures, or it didn't happen

  • Login or register to post comments
November 24th, 2010 at 10:05 AM | Maybe they won't beat us up if they can tell there are 6 of us (Score:1)
jwschultz
jwschultz's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 448

This is just so late it isn't even funny (and no one will ever see it), and this picture demonstrates ably the principle, "Don't send a cameraphone to do a camera's job in a bad lighting situation," but I found one of the old 'jerseys' in my closet at my parents' house:

Go Shamrocks!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:03 PM | Only varsity quiz bowl match (Score:1)
Bando Calrissian
Bando Calrissian's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 7964

Only varsity quiz bowl match I ever lost in 4 years was to DCD. 

 

Resentment has only recently faded.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:26 PM | "Please stop with the offense's high national rankings" (Score:1)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7198

I'll never understand the desire of so many Michigan fans to hate their football team.  Don't you dare enjoy watching an elegant and lethal offense! Joy ist verboten!

Surely we have the nation's most masochistic fanbase. 

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:08 PM | That elegant and lethal (Score:1)
Bluemandew
Joined: 11/18/2010
MGoPoints: 961

That elegant and lethal offence that put up a goose egg in the first half? That elegant and lethal offence with around 10 turnovers in the last 3 games. Sure they put up a lot of numbers and thats great. We all love to watch Denard and this offence when he is on. But forgive us if we all aren't woo hoo are offence amazing in another loss.

Just do it!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:13 PM | Meh (Score:1)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7198

Forgive me for not being angry that an offense that relies so heavily on sophomores is committing turnovers.  At this point, I care way more about whether the offense is moving the ball (which it is) and whether we have wide open receivers and runningbacks streaking all over the field (which we, like, always do). 

And, from a selfish perspective, I care whether the team is entertaining as hell to watch.  Which it is. 

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:21 PM | I guess I am on the side of (Score:1)
Bluemandew
Joined: 11/18/2010
MGoPoints: 961

I guess I am on the side of the fence that says awsome yard tottals but how about some points to go with them. I am not angry with the offense. I just think you cant hang the  D for this Wisconson loss when the 0 hung them out to dry in the first half.

Just do it!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:23 PM | Really? So it's the youth? (Score:1)
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2935

This is the third year in a row where we have horrible turnover margins. Do you project a stop to this trend sometime? Next year I suppose, just like we have all said (including myself) every year of the RR era.

"Everyone gets dumped Gabe. Let me give you some advice: a little coverup on your Adams Apple will make it appear smaller. Which will make you appear less like a transvestite." 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:30 PM | Yes (Score:1)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7198

I project next year, when the entire offense will be experienced upperclassmen.  We've started a first-year starter three years in a row.  I don't know how anyone can reasonably expect that not to have a major affect on turnover margins.  

I also project us to start running at expectation when it comes to fumbles at some point. 

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:33 PM | Next year (Score:1)
msoccer10
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 1585

is damn right.

The youth the first year gave way to even younger players in year two. Now we have sophomores on offense and freshman on defense. Next year it will be juniors on offense and sophomores on defense. Both will improve and everyone will be happier next year.

And I didn't know if the turnover trend would get better, but my predictions have been pretty good. 6-6 first year (ok, I was off, but I was way more pessimistic than most entering the year), 5-7 second year, 7-5 third year (changed from 9-3 after Turner, Emelien left and Woolfolk got hurt). Next year we will be at least 9-3 if Rodriguez stays.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:37 PM | Yes, really - third year in a row with a first year starting QB (Score:1)
robpollard
robpollard's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 601

Threet, Foricer and Robinson brought with them zero/near zero experience before they started each of the last three seasons. 

It isn't a huge logical leap that first-year starting QBs tend to turn the ball over much more than experienced starters. Just look at Iowa, Wisconsin and MSU and how Stanzi, Tolzien and Cousins have improved in the turnover era.

This isn't rocket science.

It only ends once. Anything that happens before that, is just progress.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:30 PM | All responses were fair, but also t be fair you must (Score:1)
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2935

admit that every person on this blog almost without exception, predicted before the season that our turnover margin would improve, despite the relative youth, because of one more year's experience overall. Now there seems to be some backstroking hindsight on that.

"Everyone gets dumped Gabe. Let me give you some advice: a little coverup on your Adams Apple will make it appear smaller. Which will make you appear less like a transvestite." 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:05 PM | This is definitely true.  But (Score:1)
LJ
LJ's picture
Joined: 07/05/2008
MGoPoints: 619

This is definitely true.  But the fact that there were no turnover problems at WVU have to make you think it's an inexperience issue.  We've just happened to field extremely inexperienced teams three years in a row, which I think is the root of most of our problems.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:17 PM | What is offence? (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8071

Please forgive my asking, and don't take offense to this question, but are you Canadian or British? Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:17 PM | No I am not British or (Score:1)
Bluemandew
Joined: 11/18/2010
MGoPoints: 961

No I am not British or Canadian. Just have always been horrible at spelling. I know it is a lethal flaw on the internet.

Just do it!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:26 PM | Hey it's cool (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8071

I have become complacent with my spelling in an era of spell check.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:32 PM | ^^no shit^^ (Score:1)
GunnersApe
GunnersApe's picture
Joined: 11/19/2009
MGoPoints: 4114

I still bat .500 with the spell checker.

Fuck it, Dude, let's go bowling.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:56 PM | I actually am very impressed (Score:1)
OSUMC Wolverine
OSUMC Wolverine's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 1105

I actually am very impressed with our offenses ability to pull off big plays against prevent defenses.  The whole point of prevent is to keep everything in front of you and not allow the big plays and we do it over and over.  My only issue is that we dont try more long balls early in the games to loosen things up before we are down because we have faced 8+ in the box the whole first half.  We run a fairly conservative game plan on offense until the game is getting out of reach for fear of the game getting out of reach due to offensive errors.  Thats great if you have a defense that can at least hold their own against shaky opponents but we do not have that luxury this year.  Every game we have a chance to win has to be a rat race and we have been unwilling to run until its too late.  I dont expect any conservative play calling this week on O or D.  Robinson probably sees the TUOOS game as his only chance at retaining his job and RR has to realize that sitting on a single digit lead or deficit against TUOOS at home will not suffice.  The gloves will be off the offense from the get go.

That 'elegant and lethal' offenSe is the only reason we are not 3-8 right now...woo hoo.

Reality is an illusion created by an unsafe drop in blood alcohol levels that exposes one to the idiocy of others.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:20 PM | I am not saying our offenSe (Score:1)
Bluemandew
Joined: 11/18/2010
MGoPoints: 961

I am not saying our offenSe is horrible. My problem is with the people who wave our offensive yardage numbers like a flag of victory then want to hang the defense. When you don't score in the first half or have 5 turnovers in a game with our defense against a good team you might as well go home. Our defense stopped Wisc on there first drive . What happens if our O goes down and scores? Yards are great but if you don't score they don't mean crap.

Just do it!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:52 PM | We all love watching the (Score:1)
mackbru
mackbru's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3070

We all love watching the offense click. Everyone does. But I'd say it's more like "sometimes lethal" or "potentially lethal." It's lethal against weak teams; it's lethal when we're down 24-3. It consistently put us in holes against quality teams.

But it should get to lethal. Hopefully. If our o doesn't get to that point, we're hosed.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:29 PM | What, are we supposed to be (Score:1)
dieseljr32
dieseljr32's picture
Joined: 04/19/2009
MGoPoints: 1498

What, are we supposed to be mad that our offense is good?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:02 PM | Well, his point is (Score:1)
caup
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1917

that all of those points and yards are garbage stats put up against a defense that is either complacent in a blowout or at that point is using a "prevent defense" scheme.

If that's what happened is true, that's a valid point.  But I don't think that's completely accurate.  The Michigan offense put the defenses of Iowa and Wisconsin and PSU on their heels in those second halves and had them legitimately concerned.

His post does have some merit, though. Gotta score in the first half, when the battle is joined. See: Illinois game.

Go Blue

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:19 PM | I agree that it was troubling (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12618

I agree that it was troubling to be down that much in the first half, but Wiscy was not in a "prevent:" when UM scored on 4 of the first 5 possessions in the second half.  When the team on the other side of the ball scored 67 points in a game and showed an ability to score against basically everybody on the schedule, you don't just pack it in at halftime and say "let them get going a bit, I'm sure if it gets close we can stop them." 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:23 PM | No Prevent (Score:1)
Bodogblog
Bodogblog's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 7634

Prevent is 2 safeties deep, keep everything in front of you, tackle and drag out the clock.

Was there a safety helping w/ Stonum in the 2nd half? No. Just like the 1st. Man coverage with no help, Stonum made plays at will. That's not a prevent. Ditto the pass plays for Tate against Iowa. Could be complacency, but doubt it.

I'm concerned why we stall in the first half, but it seems more related to us. We play tight early. But guys were open, blocks were being made. If Denard hits the wide open steaks in the first half, a different game. He will next year and the year after

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:29 PM | Hey, I totally agree with you (Score:1)
caup
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1917

Just want to make that clear.

Go Blue

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:39 PM | damn you (Score:1)
Bodogblog
Bodogblog's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 7634

rationality has prevented me from 1) getting my own version of UNACCEPTABLE on, and 2) edit steaks to streaks

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:57 PM | Disproved (Score:1)
smwilliams
smwilliams's picture
Joined: 08/20/2010
MGoPoints: 1763

Already disproved this in another thread.

We outgained Michigan State and Iowa in the 1st half, put up about 200 yds against Penn State in a half where I think we had 3 or 4 total drives.

Yes, the offense stalled against Wisconsin and put up the majority of their yards and points in the 2nd half, but throughout much of the 2nd half, a defensive stop would've legitimately made it a game.

Please stop with the factually inaccurate meme that the offense puts up hollow points and yards since, you know, it's incorrect.



 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:27 PM | If we had a killer D that was only giving up 10 or 12 points per (Score:1)
champswest
champswest's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 2017

game and most of us were raving about them even though we were still 7-4, guys like you would still be critical of us for appreciating the defense.  Do we have to wait for an undefeated season and a national championship before we are allowed to say good things about our team?

"I hate losing more than I like winning." - Zack

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:32 PM | How the hell do you still have 41 MGoPoints?!? (Score:1)
CompleteLunacy
CompleteLunacy's picture
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1168

 

Our offense leads the nation by leaps and bounds in hollow yards, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Right, because Lloyd Carr NEVER EVER fielded an offense who underperformed and didn't get 40 points per game against everyone.

You can sound all poetic and such, but our offense put up 28 (should have been 31, damnit) against a pretty good and experienced Wisco defense. You're targeting the wrong part of the team, man, because that should be more than enough to AT LEAST give you a shot at winning the game in the 4th quarter. .

I'm not a lunatic. Seriously, i'm not.

Ok, maybe just a little bit. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:26 PM | What does it matter if Lloyd (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 29060

What does it matter if Lloyd Carr's offenses underperformed?  That's a bit of a non-sequitor. 

The relevant point here is that our offense is supposed to be incredible, able to score on anyone, but in fact it tends to get most of its points after we've fallen well behind.  It's a frustrating trend.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:18 PM | Oh (Score:1)
Yostal
Yostal's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2786

While I liked the video initially, I come back to the same issue I had with the video when it first played: "The place where Yost built his empire"

No, that would be Ferry Field.  While I am happy to give the Old Man a great deal of leeway on things like this, that was just wrong.

Craig Barker || The Hoover Street Rag || Twitter

"The Michigan fanbase: a cynical, Eeyorish bunch even in the best of times."

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:01 PM | Perhaps they were referring (Score:1)
bsand2053
bsand2053's picture
Joined: 04/14/2010
MGoPoints: 1657

Perhaps they were referring to the fact that Yost built the Big house?  Hopefully, but I think you are right.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:45 PM | That was the intrepretation I (Score:1)
Yostal
Yostal's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2786

That was the intrepretation I was willing to grant and I have decided to move on from that point.

Craig Barker || The Hoover Street Rag || Twitter

"The Michigan fanbase: a cynical, Eeyorish bunch even in the best of times."

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:24 PM | really? because I don't ever (Score:1)
Wahlberg
Wahlberg's picture
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 216

really? because I don't ever remember that being on the requirements list when he was hired.  Everyone was really excited about the offensive potential when he was hired and last time I checked the offense is pretty darn good.

I critcize RR for not recruiting the secondary and linebacker positions harder in the '09 class but the attrition has abiliterated any depth we (used to) have at those positions.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:30 PM | Sorry, that had already happened before Rod got here. (Score:1)
TennBlue
TennBlue's picture
Joined: 10/12/2010
MGoPoints: 3319

The 2006 and 2007 recruiting classes, particularly on the defensive side, were not good.  Pretty bad, actually.  We don't get to sign free agents, we're stuck with who we've got on the roster.  It was foreordained when Rod was hired that we would have a bad defense this year.

God bless 'em, they're playing their hearts out - but this year's seniors as a group just aren't very good, and no amount of coaching was going to make them better.  The freshmen and sophomores are Rod's responsibility, but they're not exeperienced enough yet to be good.

It's not making excuses, it's just plain facts.  The sky is going to remain blue no matter how much you want it to be pink. 

I expect substantial improvement next year.  If we remain this bad, then there will be something seriously wrong.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:20 PM | That Michigan stadium video (Score:1)
cjpops
cjpops's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 1709

That Michigan stadium video is horrendous.  I couldn't pull myself away, tho.  Just staring, slack jawed into the computer screen.

"If you shoot me, you're liable to lose a lot of those humanitarian awards."

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:29 PM | Puke (Score:1)
UAUM
UAUM's picture
Joined: 11/03/2010
MGoPoints: 1037

I actually puked in my mouth.  It was like watching reality TV.  Trash, but you just can't pull yourself away from it.

 

Your MGoLawyers in Columbus.  Unabashedly representing the interests of Wolverines all across enemy territory and now back hoMe.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:10 PM | eh (Score:1)
snowcrash
Joined: 07/22/2008
MGoPoints: 1586

I watched it with the sound off. It didn't seem that bad.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:33 PM | The thing that made it (Score:1)
lbpeley
lbpeley's picture
Joined: 01/29/2009
MGoPoints: 1620

atrocious was the narrator's voice. He sucked massive donkey dong. What he was reading would have been much more bearable if he wasn't trying to sound like Barwis lite.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:40 PM | The announcer sounds like minor league hockey (Score:1)
robpollard
robpollard's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 601

Couldn't we have paid Keith Jackson a cool hundred thousand to do these things? 

Or heck, I don't know, get someone already on the payroll like Frank Beckmann, who has a good voice and we already know, do this?  Who the heck is this atrocious voice over guy?

It only ends once. Anything that happens before that, is just progress.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:01 PM | Oh man it FIRED ME UP! (Score:1)
might and main
might and main's picture
Joined: 11/18/2008
MGoPoints: 950

I say to hell with all our real families ... we should all get together for Thanksgiving dinner at the Big House!!!  We are part of history!  We are the Victors!  We have majestic magic on our side!  Make that: Majestic Magic.  No, make that MAJESTIC MAGIC!!! 

ah hell, never mind.


  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:20 PM | that was badger, not beaver that they were having rubbed (Score:1)
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 5175

on them, repeatedly, in fact, and yeah--I think GERG is a goner. The stench is so bad that it doesn't even matter whether any of it is his fault anymore. Nice deployment of the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern thing, btw.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:20 PM | This is bloggity gold: (Score:1)
Surferrosy
Surferrosy's picture
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 201

Our defensive coordinator literally rubs small stuffed animals on people's faces.

As the creeper that girdles the tree-trunk 
the Law runneth forward and back --
For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf,
and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:31 PM | Mind Blowing (Score:1)
mgofootball4
mgofootball4's picture
Joined: 06/21/2009
MGoPoints: -99999841

I couldn't believe that actually happened.  Wow, holy shit, and damn. 

G. Robinson's schemes aren't putting his players in position to succeed, but I'll have full faith in his coaching abilities if he tosses and rubs a few buckeyes on his players this Saturday. 

www.MGOFOOTBALL.com

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:53 PM | Speaking of mammals- what is (Score:1)
Glutton
Glutton's picture
Joined: 08/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2132

Speaking of mammals- what is that mascot in the green "00" jersey in the endzone photo?

"But it is better to live here in sackcloth and ashes than to own the whole state of Ohio."

-- Lafcadio Hearn

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:23 PM | That's the Slippery Rock (Score:1)
mikoyan
mikoyan's picture
Joined: 09/06/2010
MGoPoints: 1942

That's the Slippery Rock Mascot.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.