Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (55)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Does Expansion Actually Lead to More Recruits From a Certain Region?
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 2 days ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 4 days ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 4 days ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 982 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 802 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 785 views
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 685 views
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 674 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 18 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 17 comments
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 13 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Champions League Final - Borussia Dortmund vs Bayern Munich
    4 replies
  • Burke & THJ NBA Draft Workout Videos
    5 replies
  • Urban Meyer regrets the way his Florida tenure ended, said Alabama should have lost three games
    22 replies
  • M v. ULL Super Regional Open Thread
    36 replies
  • I'm meeting Trey Burke today!
    36 replies
  • Mike Farrell: Michigan and Hokies tied in lead for Da'Shawn Hand
    62 replies
  • Help Finding Great Video Clips
    18 replies
  • Friday night drinking thread
    32 replies
  • OT: The Tigers game is very interesting
    97 replies
  • Michigan wrestlers accused of Molotov cocktail possession suspended indefinitely
    65 replies
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    191 replies
  • Softball Super Regional v. Louisiana-Lafayette, game 1
    55 replies
  • Sam Webb write up on five-star center Elijah Thomas
    17 replies
  • There should be 110,000 Rubber Chickens at the ND Game
    40 replies
  • OT- Miguel Cabrera is good at baseball, visual proof
    36 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Urban Meyer regrets the way his Florida tenure ended, said Alabama should have lost three games
    22 replies
  • M v. ULL Super Regional Open Thread
    36 replies
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    191 replies
  • OT: Champions League Final - Borussia Dortmund vs Bayern Munich
    4 replies
  • Mike Farrell: Michigan and Hokies tied in lead for Da'Shawn Hand
    62 replies
  • Burke & THJ NBA Draft Workout Videos
    5 replies
  • I'm meeting Trey Burke today!
    36 replies
  • Help Finding Great Video Clips
    18 replies
  • Friday night drinking thread
    32 replies
  • Softball Super Regional v. Louisiana-Lafayette, game 1
    55 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    160 replies
  • Sam Webb write up on five-star center Elijah Thomas
    17 replies
  • OT- Miguel Cabrera is good at baseball, visual proof
    36 replies
  • Michigan wrestlers accused of Molotov cocktail possession suspended indefinitely
    65 replies
  • Which Pay Site Is Best?
    63 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    193 replies
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    191 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    160 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    151 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    146 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    146 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    141 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    117 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    110 replies
  • OT: The Tigers game is very interesting
    97 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    93 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Burke says Michigan can be 'just as good' next year with McGary, Robinson III leading

    yes plz

    0 comments
  • SEC coaches with tiny faces

    I don't think they changed Les at all actually

    1 comments
  • This college baseball team is the best at postgame interviews

    national champs baby

    1 comments
  • Rounding up the latest in NCAA absurdities.

    Patrick Hruby is doing God's work.

    0 comments
  • Cornell wrestler tops Michigan's Trey Burke for Sports Illustrated award | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

    first comment: "EVERY ATHLETE HAS ASPIRATIONS OF WINNING AND WE HAVE OUR FAVORITES BUT IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO OTHER STUDENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, TOO!"

    0 comments
  • Burke hearing he'll go two through six in NBA draft

    stupid Pistons and their refusal to tank properly

    0 comments
  • 2013 NHL Draft Prospect: Andrew Copp

    rundown of Michigan's riser

    0 comments
  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Robinson And Guildenstern Are Dead

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — November 22nd, 2010 at 1:08 PM — 181 comments
Filed under:
  • 2010 wisconsin
  • game columns
  • greg robinson's stuffed beaver
  • jeremy gallon
  • onside kicks
  • rich rodriguez

11/20/2010 – Michigan 28, Wisconsin 48 – 7-4, 3-4 Big Ten

wisconsin-touchdown

Detroit News

During my illustrious high school quiz bowl career* I ran across a question about Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, the Tom Stoppard play about a couple of bit players in Hamlet. It started off "the first 47 words of this play are 'heads,'" at which point someone else rang in and answered. Later I'd find out via the miracle of DVR that the reason the first 47 words of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead are "heads" is because one of the characters flips a coin over and over again. It always comes up heads. Rosencrantz or Guildenstern—it's unclear who is who for the duration—arrives at the conclusion that they are "within un-, sub-, or supernatural forces."

This weekend I'm scanning the message board for threads to terminate with extreme prejudice when I run across something from Mgrowold about the events of Saturday's second half:

Wisconsin then proceeded to run the ball 32 out of 33 times in the second half of today's game.  As I sat in the stadium it occurred to me that if a running play was "heads" and a passing play was "tails" then the Badger's play calling went something like this: heads, heads, tails, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads, heads and then heads.

Wikipedia describes Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead as an "absurdist, existentialist tragicomedy." This is Greg Robinson rubbing a beaver on Kenny Demens's face in the midst of a game where the Michigan defense gave up 560 yards and Scott Tolzien's only incompletion was a James Rogers interception, his third in two games:

At this point the column writes itself.

-----------------------------------------

Apparently this is not literally true and now I have to put words down.

This is disappointing; you always hope if you really, really nail it in the first couple paragraphs you can watch the words appear as if by magic and then you won't have to seriously think about what happened in a game where Wisconsin punted once for the second consecutive year. Not accurate.

Obviously that was awful. Michigan had no answer to Wisconsin's series of basic "hai guys we're Wisconsin" runs. They went back to the same stupid 3-3-5 with Kenny Demens lined up two inches from his nose tackle's butt that got Michigan obliterated against Penn State. Wisconsin's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern second half was immensely, grindingly depressive but did have a secondary effect: it mostly absolved the improbably young secondary from blame. The front seven/eight aren't universally freshmen and should be able to hold a team under, I don't know, 350 yards of rushing.

I said my bit on the job status of Rodriguez and Robinson already. Michigan put up 28 that would have been 31 if not for a missed 30 yard field goal. That's on par with Wisconsin's worst performances of the year—Michigan State put up 34 but got a punt return touchdown, Iowa put up 30. The defense was the same incoherent mess it's been the whole year. It was more depressing than I expected, but at this point whatever, right?

Saturday reinforced both positions. Our defensive coordinator literally rubs small stuffed animals on people's faces. Denard Robinson broke the I-A record for rushing yards by a quarterback and is the first guy in history to have 1500 rushing yards and 2500 passing yards in the same season. Michigan is the most dichotomous team in at least the last decade of college football, and while I won't be horribly upset if Rodriguez does get the axe I still think the best thing for the next year or two is to see what happens when Denard Robinson is an upperclassman and the defense isn't starting four freshmen and three more sophomores. Michigan did manage to achieve the modest goals set before it, albeit in unimpressive fashion.

-----------------------------------------

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are boyhood friends of Hamlet summoned to a castle undergoing chaos. They've got no idea what's going on, are used as pawns, stumble around cluelessly, and end up hanging by their necks until they are dead. Woefully underprepared and doomed from the start, their deaths are both unfair and unavoidable. The third act is set on the boat they take to England and their deaths; they discover the letter sent with them says to execute Hamlet, then discover the Hamlet's fateful switch.

Much of the last bit is devoted to a discussion of how the pair can be so important as to necessitate their execution. I wonder if that's how Rodriguez felt as he watched the half of his team he delegates to someone else ground into a fine dust, like Jeff Casteel had switched his defense with one that read "execute this man."

*(We were actually pretty good, the Wisconsin/Iowa of Michigan high school quiz bowl at the time. We'd own most teams we played but would consistently lose close games to Salem, CC, DCD, and a Henry Ford Harrison team that had lucked into the National Geography Bee winner. We prided ourselves on not having uniforms, at least.)

Existentialist, Absurdist, Tragicomic Non-Bullets

Jeremy Gallon special teams error limit: determined. It is ten billion. I'm obviously on the tolerant side of the scale when it comes to coaching errors (outside of obvious game theory errors, about which I have an Al Qaeda level of zealotry) but JESUS GOD RICH RODRIGUEZ WHY DID YOU LET JEREMY GALLON RETURN KICKS AND PUNTS FOR TEN GAMES.

On the bright side, Michigan's kick returns finally seemed like a net positive aside from the Gallon fumble. Which aaaaargh. The strange thing about those returns was that Wisconsin seemed to be putting them exactly where they wanted—right along one sideline—and still gave up big returns seemingly every time.

A note on how meaningless the NCAA's official kick return stats are: in one game Michigan went from a horrendous debacle to essentially average. They're 67th now. I'll ping Brian Fremeau for his fancy stats at the end of the year to see what the actual damage was in the kick return game.

Small move towards Pulaski. Hey: surprise onside kick that absolutely should have worked but for two Michigan players whiffing on opportunities to recover. Since Wisconsin was going to score anyway, the only tactical error was not doing this two additional times. Also, the last one was not a surprise but it was beautifully executed by the kicker. Maybe that's what they've been practicing all year.

If Roy Roundtree drops a sure first down the next pass will be batted skyward and intercepted 15 yards behind the line of scrimmage. Fact. Please stop doing this, Roy.

First half struggles. The offense didn't score in the first half due to a confluence of events. Event the second: field goal kicker durrr combined with coaching durrrr about the field goal kicker durrrrr. Event the first and many other bits: Robinson couldn't throw straight. Wisconsin shoved guys up to the LOS and dared Michigan to throw deep. Michigan threw deep. Robinson missed guys by yards and yards, including an open Vincent Smith on that third and six that eventually led to field goal durrrr.

In the second half Robinson hit a series of bombs, forced Wisconsin to back off, and Michigan went TD, TD, TD, fate induced post-Roundtree INT, TD. Again, the design of the offense is excellent and while Robinson's lack of accuracy is now an established issue this level of performance with two seniors on the field is remarkable.

God, this was awful. I hate to embed this and inflict it on the public at large, but this was awwwwwful:

I'm actually a fan of Old Hat Creative's work with Michigan's hype videos but Notre Dame fans would laugh at this treacly debacle. Athletic department: I will write sentimental stuff with 10% of the schmaltz for free. I will pay you if this is the alternative. Guh.

Things that were good. A fond farewell to drum major David Hines Jr., whose backbend will remain legendary, and various other band seniors. The MMB bounced back from a year in which they forced Carl Grapentine to say "the clown who laughs outside as he cries inside" and deployed a series of accessible halftime shows that did not involve various operas of the 19th century. The Wizard of Oz halftime was good, Lady Gaga translates to marching band in a shockingly effective fashion, and the hockey band just played the old Hockey Night in Canada theme. Thumbs up.

Bret Bielema: still a huge jerk. This isn't a surprise from a guy who saw one of his special teams scrubs attempt to injure Steve Breaston and then pretended it didn't even happen, but Bret Bielema said his team sent "a message" by chop-blocking one of Michigan's linemen on that first-half drive that didn't end in a touchdown. You know, that one.

Elsewhere

Michigan Exposures with a bunch of pictures, including the random F-15E wandering around the stadium before kickoff, a panoramic shot, and:

  • Pregame
    banner-touch
  • Game
    slippery-rock
  • Postgame
    art-deco-m

I should start regularly linking Mike DeSimone's comprehensive picture galleries, which collect everything shot on a game-by-game basis and act as a crutch here.

I made this facial expression at the exact same time!

Joe Stapleton says he feels sorry for Rodriguez. On RR's postgame mini-rant about the exceptional youth in the secondary:

It's an excuse and reality. As much as I would like to say it, the biggest problem with the defense isn't the abjectly awful coaching of defensive coordinator Greg Robinson (Though it certainly doesn't help — as gaudy as Wisconsin's offensive numbers were, they could have been a lot worse if the Badgers would've taken advantage of the WIDE-open middle of the field through the air). It's the youth in the secondary.

Some say, without thinking, that this is Rodriguez's fault. He should've recruited more (and better) defensive backs. Here's the thing: he had defensive backs. They all just kinda ... left. That, or they got injured.

I'm at the point where losing Vlad Emilien, no matter how not good he may have been, is a strike against you, but by in large most of the departures were ordained like a post-Roundtree drop INT. Wojo's column is along the same lines as this one.

AnnArbor.com runs a poll of their own about RR's job security; the ones run around here earlier in the year by The White Tiger are more extensive but MGoBlog actively discourages people from the militant wing of the fanbase from participating so the numbers at AA.com are probably more representative. They've got 3300 votes in with 41% saying boot him, 22% saying "one more year," and 33% saying "I support him." A very strange 2% of people took the time to vote "I don't care." That's a majority saying keep him but it's vastly short of the 81% who voted "keep him" at 7-5 in the poll around these parts. (Michigan had yet to play Illinois and Purdue when that poll was deployed.)

Across various blogs the reaction seems to be mostly "not surprised." Touch The Banner:

This is a game that I expected Michigan to lose.  Almost everyone did.  That's not to say that I wasn't frustrated by some of the things that the coaches and players did - and the offensive production in the first half was somewhat embarrassing - but ultimately, this outcome is what most educated observers foresaw.

TTB does say the constant use of Vinopal as a blitzer was stupid, which yeah. Burgeoning Wolverine Star:

Wisconsin is that good. It's not surprising, then, that Michigan struggled so mightily against an oversized, veteran unit that is unquestionably the best outfit in the Big Ten. That doesn't make Michigan's complete inability to stop the run or their general defensive incompetence any less disappointing, but it does mitigate it somewhat.

Mets Maize:

My prediction--Wisconsin 45-28--and similar ones around the blogosphere was closer than the Vegas spread (-4.5 Wisconsin). We knew we were outmatched, plain and simple. Too many things had to go our way and JJ Watt's self-tip and pick was not one of them. The disparity between Wisconsin's physicality and Michigan's, uhhh, collection of 18-year-old biceps was worlds apart. I'm sort of glad the game flew by.

The Hoover Street Rag busts out Jefferson's inaugural address in a plea for people who think one side or the other of the Rodriguez debate is full of idiots. MGoFootball peruses the board for choice bits.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:21 PM | Oh, come on... (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38880

Who doesn't love rubbing up against a stuffed beaver?

 

Everyone's doing it nowadays.....

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:24 PM | Denard's NCAA record (Score:1)
denverblue
denverblue's picture
Joined: 09/05/2009
MGoPoints: 488

"Denard Robinson broke the I-A record for rushing yards by a quarterback and is the first guy in history to have 1500 rushing yards and 2500 passing yards in the same season."

Mgoblue's stats show Denard at 2229 yards passing. He hasn't broken 2500 yet, though between OSU and the bowl game, he probably will.

The record I heard getting tossed around was that he was the first 1500/1500 guy, which would also make him the first 2000/1500 guy.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:30 PM | Tough loss, but I'm still not mad (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8048

The beating was expected. However, I was hoping the defense would show up on the heels of its performance at Purdue.

The maddening part for me was the coaches' stubborness to stick with that bullshit 3-3-5 even though we were getting gashed. I never saw four DL, and if there was, I missed it. Vinopal got slammed backward every time he tried to blitz.

And you're right about Roy dropping an easy first down and then the interception following on schedule.

I just really hope we show up to play Ohio State with some sort of pulse. If not, and we are beaten soundly, I will not cry if RR is replaced.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:48 PM | The 3-3-5 (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

I remain a Rodriguez supporter and I already consider this season a success, but after watching the games and hearing that WVU people have told Sam Webb that Michigan isn't doing a lot of the things that Casteel does at WVU, I can't get behind any coach who wants to run the 3-3-5, at least as it's currently being run at Michigan.  I think that you have to have three d-linemen and four LBs or four d-lineman and three LBs when you're going up against the Wisconsins of the world. 

As for blitzing Vinopal, I hoped that I was mis-seeing things during the game.  That just seems...less than wise. 

Robinson seems like a very decent guy but he needs to be replaced.  RR also needs to give the new coordinator the freedom to do what he sees fit. 

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:55 PM | Vinopal (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8048

Vinopal was coming off the edge quite a bit, and never once, was able to get pressure. 

As for this 3-3-5, or whatever they run, I hate it. We have three undersized DL and then an additional three or four guys at the LOS who are smallish. I don't think it will work and I agree Gerg needs to go.

We need a D-coordinator who is fiery and can recruit like a Mofo. I don't think Gerg even really recruits. He's too busy playing with that damned stuffed animal.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:16 PM | Off-season topic (Score:1)
GunnersApe
GunnersApe's picture
Joined: 11/19/2009
MGoPoints: 4101

My dream/IMHO:

Go down to TCU and study or steal away one of there up and coming D coaches and make him M's DC. 4-2-5/4-3, hell Boise St. studied it and came out the next year and beat them with it (also ran a 4-1-6 form they adapted off of it). The only D coach that should be kept is B. Tall.

The 4-2-5 seems to be the new base D for spread/pro teams, bring in another LB(4-3) for the big teams but at least there is consistency with a four man front. 3 DL should only be on the field when M is up by 20 in the 4th and are in a total prevent.

Fuck it, Dude, let's go bowling.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:29 PM | I love this (Score:1)
Bodogblog
Bodogblog's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 7587

please implement

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:31 PM | Agreed (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8048

Even if it takes dump truck filled with cash, make it happen.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:51 PM | How much (Score:1)
romeyjdogg
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1207

more evidence do we need that the 3-3-5 alignment gets gashed every game? Seriously, why the hell did they go back to this? When the O-lineman and TEs take out your 3 D-lineman and 3 LBs and your free hitters are people like Avery and Vinopal, what the hell do you expect? I don't knock the guys out there, just the coaches. Unreal.

Unless we're playing against a spread team, ditch the 3-3-5!

 

/rant

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:31 PM | Ahhhh, one of my favorite movies. (Score:1)
Subrosa
Subrosa's picture
Joined: 08/16/2008
MGoPoints: 325

R&G are Dead is pure, unadulterated gold.

Anyone up for a game of questions?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:34 PM | Post Mortem (Score:1)
Kolesar40
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: -876

1) Why was Vincent Smith in the game on the last drive? We had our second string qb, and wrs in at that time, and given our rb situation, he should have been on the bench and Hopkins should have been in. That was a horrible decision, and I hope he is not lost for OSU.

2) Why does Stonum look/act hurt after every single tackle? They guy is extremely fragile.

3) Brian hit it on the head. It seems that immediately following a dropped pass (usually from Roy) we turn it over. Very disturbing.

4) I was clamoring for 8 in the box and give up the pass. In the 2nd half, we knew they were running, put 8 in the box and still got hammered. They could have thrown crossing routes to Toon all day had they wanted to.

5) Hard to believe we are still attempting FGs 11 games into the season. 30 yards away, in the middle of the field. The numbers will continue not to lie, and RRod has to understand that.

6) Demens might have put up Ezeh like numbers this week. Our LBs were getting sealed on the backside all day, and thus the gaping cutback lanes. All the LBs playing away from the play side were guilty of this.

7) Bielema is now my least favorite coach in the Big Ten. Tressel,and Dantonio are close behind.

8) Go Blue. Beat OSU.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:25 PM | 1) Vincent Smith is the most (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27477

1) Vincent Smith is the most trusted pass blocker on the team.

2) Who cares?  Stonum has rarely been injured, and the lone injury on Saturday (for which he was carted off the field) looked fairly serious.  I don't care how he looks; I care how he plays, and he played well.

7) Dantonio's still the biggest ass.  Regardless of whether Bielema runs up the score or "teaches a lesson," at least he doesn't make a habit of welcoming convicts back onto his team with open arms on the day they're released from jail.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:37 PM | I understand (Score:1)
Kolesar40
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: -876

he is the most trusted pass blocker. That does not mean he should be on the field when RRod is clearly givng second string guys some reps. Given our lack of depth, let other guys get reps, and save Smith for OSU.

I care if a guy is hurt or not. I thought he played great, but the signs that he is either hurt, or fragile is telling in a game where he ended up leaving with a serious injury. Seems like his condition was leading to a mroe serious injury.

I wont argue vehemntly on #7. I can see arguments from all sides on this one.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:08 PM | I'm not disagreeing with you (Score:1)
dcmaizeandblue
Joined: 04/01/2010
MGoPoints: 674

I'm not disagreeing with you but didn't Bielema have a running back who could only play home games due to the fact he wasn't allowed out of the state last season or the year before?  I recall hearing something to that effect but it may have been exaggerated. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:31 PM | 2 -  I don't know what you're (Score:1)
BlueGoM
BlueGoM's picture
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 2838

1 - I think Stokes and Jackson were out there at least in part due to the fact that Stonum was hurt and Hemingway kept acting like he was hurt, IIRC.

2 -  I don't know what you're talking about.   If there is WR that has proven to be fragile it is Junior Hemingway who missed most of his first 2 seasons with injuries.

3- I think (hope) Brian was being facetious.  It makes no sense that if a player A drops a pass on one play, the next play is going to be an INT regardless of what play is called.

4- we put 8 in the box?  I guess I didn't notice because it obviously never worked.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:48 PM | #1 (Score:1)
Kolesar40
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: -876

 

 

Agreed. But it was clear with Tate in the game, down 3 scores with 2 minutes left and 1 truisted rb, we should be preserving health. All the more if we already have 2 receivers down.

 

#2 Go back and watch the game. Stonum looks injured after each tackle. Again, it has nothing to do with how well he played, but it is obvious. My observation was not a comparison, but rather commentary on Stonum in this game. Heminway has obviously suffered more injuries.

#3 I think he was being facetious as well, but that does not discount the fact that it has happened multiple times this season. it is horrible coincidence/fate, not causation.

#4 Again go back and watch the game. We crept safeties up to the line and it made absolutely no difference.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:40 PM | Dude, for serious, did you (Score:1)
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1367

Dude, for serious, did you see what happened to Stonum's knee on replay?

I also think Brain was kidding about the turnovers you mention in #3, unless you are seriously concerned that D-lineman catching their own deflections is some how linked to dropping passes.

Give it to Wheatley!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:52 PM | Obviously, he wasn't being (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 28972

Obviously, he wasn't being serious, but it's weird that that exact two-play sequence - Roundtree dropping a pass followed by a DE tipping and intercepting a pass on the next play - has happened to us twice in the last three games.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:59 PM | Plus (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7894

Plus, in the middle of those three games against Purdue, Roundtree dropped a pass and Denard lost a fumble on the next play from scrimmage

Cree-fucking-py

Where can we find this prop bet for Saturday?

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:51 PM | I'm not saying anything new, (Score:1)
glewe
glewe's picture
Joined: 08/25/2010
MGoPoints: 445

I'm not saying anything new, but Stonum got slammed into the ground not once, but twice on that play. I couldn't see from where I was sitting what exactly he had hurt, but I'm guessing it was everything. That was a serious injury.

Also, Dantonio is my least favorite, followed by Bielema. 83 points is not acceptable to put up against a lousy team. Tressel seems respectable enough from all accounts I've heard but then I haven't been paying attention for quite long enough to judge.

Twenty-two Michigan Wolverines
put on the gloves of gray.
And as Revelli played The Victors,
they laid Woody Hayes away.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:35 PM | points in second half (Score:1)
TCPW
TCPW's picture
Joined: 10/02/2008
MGoPoints: 15

Good read except for the points.  Once again the offense racks up points in the second half with the game virtually decided. 

I was one of the 81% that said keep him at 7-5, but I am sick of the excuses.  I can no longer except this type of performance.  Yes Wisconsin is a good team, but an at home blow out on senior day???  The leadership from RR is poor at best.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:48 PM | Virtually decided (Score:1)
msoccer10
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 1585

If the game was virtually decided, its only because the defense and special teams cannot be expected to contribute in any meaningful way, because we were only down ten points less than halfway through the 3rd quarter.

I was very dissappointed in our offense, because I knew we needed to keep pace with them in the first half in order to have a chance, but if we had an average defense that could keep Wisconsin to say 14 first half points, we are in a close contest until the end.

Also, don't forget, because of Gallon's fumble, Wisconsin had 6 possesions in the first half and Michigan really only had 4.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:39 PM | Thank you Brian.  (Score:1)
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 13180

Thank you Brian. 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:40 PM | Funny, we were the Michigan (Score:1)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11829

Funny, we were the Michigan State of quiz bowl teams: a pretty good team that wound up third in the state thanks to getting the easy side of the bracket and one good win while the other side of the bracket destroyed itself.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:48 PM | God I wish I could argue with (Score:1)
bryemye
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 2374

God I wish I could argue with you.

My Blog

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:49 PM | Perhaps you can condense all (Score:1)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7062

Perhaps you can condense all your thoughts into a single comment, rather than spamming 5 different responses to nobody?

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:51 PM | #4 (Score:1)
EZMIKEP
Joined: 10/13/2008
MGoPoints: 908

Did you really have to put that? Like that was anyones fault but a bunch of whiny assholes on a witch hunt. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:24 PM | Facts (Score:1)
romeyjdogg
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1207

Are facts.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:57 PM | Except when they are made up (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12593

Except when they are made up by a leacherous newspaper journalist with an axe to grind.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:14 PM | How is #2 really his fault?  (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12593

How is #2 really his fault?  The team had maybe 2-3 defensive starters/significant contributors on senior day.  That's not on RR.  Yes, the recruiting on defense is his responsibility, but he also inherited a team with little depth on the defensive side. 

With #3, he recruited one of the best kickers in the country, held multiple tryouts, etc.  What else can he really do for kids who apparently can no longer kick a ball through the uprights.  Hagerup has been very good - is that his fault?  The kick returns have been atrocious and there is no reason Gallon should be back there, but I honestly don't think the returns have been a major cause of UM's struggles this year.

As for #4, do you honestly think that was RR's fault, or was it the compliance departments AND a head-hunting hack job by the local newspaper?  I mean, the NCAA basically absolved him of major responsibility, found little in the way of infractions, and continually refuted the claims made in the Freep. 

#1 and #5 I agree with to an extent, and I expect they will be factors going forward in Brandon's evaluation of the program.  But take a deep breath man.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:32 PM | I'd say it's half his fault. (Score:1)
mackbru
mackbru's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3068

I'd say it's half his fault. Lloyd left things a little shaky on the defensive front (though not entirely so). But RR lost key recruits/transfers. A weak, young secondary needed, at the very least, depth. He hurt his cause there. And, although there seem to be a few promising young players, does anyone get the sense that many of RR's d recruits are surefire future stars? Can't be sure yet, of course. And they seem to play hard. But there aren't many young d players that make you say, "Wow! In a year or two, that kid's gonna be unstoppable!" Hope it proves otherwise, though.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:56 PM | I won't disagree that RR (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12593

I won't disagree that RR beats some blame, but Warren left with eligibility because he was fed bad advice from scouts - I don't blame a guy for leaving if he could be drafted in the 1st/2nd round.  There is little RR can do to change a kid's mind about that, even if it turned out to be wrong.

As for the secondary, the team does have depth - it just is injured or very young.  Next year the team will have 8-9 guys with multiple game experience, and that will be huge. 

RR recruited top guys like Cissoko, Turner, Christian, etc. - guru approved kids who either never made it on campus, left for reasons beyond the coach's control, and are still very young.  Recruiting some of these kids and failing to develop them does fall on RR in part, but he had little in the way of depth when he stepped into Schmebechler Hall to protect against these types of issues.  That falls on Carr. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:49 PM | @ Ed Shuttlesworth (Score:1)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14314

Rod's tenure has been utterly lacking in attention to detail in everything other than his role as de facto offensive coordinator:

1.  Two DCs, both bad. 

And of course, neither of the two bad DCs (a) were Coach Rodriguez's first choice, or (b) were so clearly, obviously bad choices on paper that they were coaching malpractice to have made them.  We may yet find out what kind of defense Michigan can field under Rich Rodriguez, if Jeff Casteel becomes the new DC in the next 90 days.

2.  Almost unimaginably bad defensive talent.

Others beat me to it; that is Rich Rodriguez's fault how?  We recruited near-equal numbers of defensive and offensive recruits, with very heavy emphasis in DB's in the last two recruiting classes.

3.  Horrific special teams, right down to 4 for 13 in field goals and a kick returner who's forced one of Michigan's most literate recent graduates, our friendly blogmaster, to resort to ALL CAPS to get his point fully across.

I agree with our blogmaster.  And guess what.  Ohio State's blogmasters have been complaining for much of the year about the Buckeyes special teams.  You may be able to find some of those complaints at www.FireTressel.com.  Have a nice day.

4.  Probation for not paying attention and organizing practice and compliance.

You.  Just.  Lost.  All your bullshit are belong to us now.  Any alleged "Michigan fan" who asserts Stretchgate as any sort of a serious, credible knock on Rich Rodriguez is FAIL.  Go away.  Get out.  The Freep story was nothing more than demonstrable bullshit.  The NCAA investigation came up with nothing more than truly silly bullshit.

5.  Very poor performances coming out of the tunnel for the first half against top-half Big Ten teams.

Wait a minute here; 'first half against top-half...'  Brian said there wouldn't be any math.  Since I'm no good at fractions, and because I instead operate exclusively in whole numbers, I say this -- Rich Rodriguez runs our offense and has taken it from one of the worst units in the nation, to one of the best, with absoltuely no letup in sight, and perhaps some historic levels of achievement in the coming years.  How's that?

Against all this, an offense that can move the ball against mediocre teams in both halves and against good teams in one half ... well, let's just say it pales.

Fractions again.

We are simply non-competitive with the top four or five teams in the Big Ten.   Including LITTLE BROTHER, against whom, comparing last year and this, we've badly regressed.

You know, there are a lot of teams in the Big Ten who don't think MSU has "regressed."  Like, uh, Wisconsin.  Look, I don't like the losses to MSU.  I won't make any excuses for our losses or for Sparty's wins.  I will make the case, quite happily, that judging Rich Rodriguez by the measures that you seem to desire, I'd like him to be the guy to continue to lead our football program:

  • "Progress"?  He's made historic progress with our offense, which is what he does.
  • "Defensive coordinator"?  RR's first choice was Jeff Casteel.  I think that choice, and the past three years of defensive results at WVU, reflects very well on RR, thank you very much.  It'd be nice if we can get Casteel.
  • "NCAA violations"?  100% pure horseshit.
  • "The future of the program"?  What's your suggestion?

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:56 PM | hate to point out taht Shafer is doing well at Syracuse (Score:1)
Blue Blue Blue
Blue Blue Blue's picture
Joined: 06/20/2010
MGoPoints: -999596

of all places.   maybe running the DC out pronto is not always good.

still expect GERG to be gone, mostly to pacify the right wing element of our fanbase.

Michigan Man

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:31 PM | I'll let the tacky (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 28972

I'll let the tacky "right-wing" comment slide and note this: Shafer effected improvement immediately at Syracuse.  A good DC can do that.  Greg Robinson's track record (not just at Michigan, but everywhere) strongly suggests that he flat-out isn't a good DC.  The results speak for themselves.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 27th, 2010 at 1:29 PM | Or maybe GERG isn't a bad (Score:1)
mgoblue0970
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 845

Or maybe GERG isn't a bad coach after all but (heck, both Shafer and GERG) couldn't succeed in an environment where the contradictory HC, who parrots "scheme doesn't matter", shoves a gimmick scheme down the throat of the DC. 

Perhaps it's hard to do well in an environment where the DC has no prior experience with the gimmick scheme.

Perhaps it's hard to do well in an environment where the gimmick scheme highlights the team's weaknesses.

Perhaps Shafer is doing well at 'Cuse because he doesn't have bestest buddies of the HC undermining his decisions and actually has some leeway to actually coach. 

I'm glad Shafer is doing well.  He and his family was as excited as anyone to come to Michigan.  I'm glad to see he's found a home if for just a bit.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:49 PM | Go for 2... (Score:1)
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 1863

I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere, but when UM scored to make it 24-6, I really don't get why they didn't go for two.  At that point, you're down three scores if you can get three tds with two point conversions.  I realize there was a ton of game to go, but to catch up from 24-0 at 7 points a chunk, you needed three stops.  Did anyone realistically think that was going to happen?  I think the best bet would have been to try to get 8 every time and hope to get two stops and get lucky and catch up.  The way it ended up playing out, it didn't matter, but I think that was a mistake on Rodriguez's part. 

Also, the continued shots at Robinson without continued acknowledgement of Rodriguez's significant responsibility for the defensive debacle just doesn't make sense to me.

Also, saying the offense kept up their end of the bargain by putting up totals equivilant to MSU and Iowa in an incomplete analysis when all of those points were scored after the game was out of reach.  This has happened three times now, it is a pattern, not an outlier. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:05 PM | If I remember right, we had (Score:1)
bluebyyou
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 2683

If I remember right, we had 100 yards total O at the end of the first half.  I am also frustrated by those who look at total yards.  I look at only one thing...wins and losses.  Nothing else matters.

How about not using the three time outs at the end of the half, when we were starting to move the ball.  What was the rationale behind that?

Let us not forget, that GERG was Rod's hire.  

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:59 PM | Two problems I can see ... (Score:1)
zlionsfan
zlionsfan's picture
Joined: 10/31/2008
MGoPoints: 624

one is, obviously, you need to be able to convert, or at least have an estimated chance of success greater than two times the AGH KICKER rate. 24-0 at 8 points a try requires two stops, sure, but at 6 points, it requires 4 ... counterpoint: perhaps this could have served as practice for when they really need a two-point conversion, but I don't know how much that helps. Second counterpoint: this team is probably better off trying twos than most teams in the country, given the AGH KICKER and the options the offense has, no matter how much some people seem to dislike it.

The other is the potential for a four-point swing, which is probably a significant risk on a pass play. Twos are less of a gamble in the pros, where the only results are 0 and 2, but in college, a poor decision can leave you in almost the same boat from which you were trying desperately to escape. Counterpoint: perhaps this is why you practice them, in situations where who the hell cares, so you get some results you can analyze for future use.

Conventional wisdom, also known as "coaching not to get blamed", probably suggests that you don't go for two until later in the game. Rodriguez doesn't strike me as the type to stick to "the chart", so I'm guessing that it was Reason #2 ...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:14 PM | I would say (Score:1)
CompleteLunacy
CompleteLunacy's picture
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1167

because UM actually gained momentum, why risk ruining it with only a chance at an extra 2 points? If our kickers were unreliable on extra points, then you have a point...but as it stands, even with our great offense, hitting a two point conversion on 3 straight touchdowns would be very unlikely. 

And momentum on this young team is paramount. Remember, they did go on to immediately score 7 more points after that first TD. (And 7 more after that...though Wisco had scored again, of course). 

I'm not a lunatic. Seriously, i'm not.

Ok, maybe just a little bit. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 4:33 PM | Kind of... (Score:1)
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 1863

You have a point with the momentum thing.  Not getting it would defintiely be a downturn of the momentum.  It's a decent point.

"hitting a two point conversion on 3 straight touchdowns would be very unlikely. "

True, but was it less likely than getting the required three stops on that day against that team?  Maybe, maybe not.  I'm not saying going for two was a great option, but I think, all things considered, it was a better option. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:59 PM | In the most high and palmy (Score:1)
evenyoubrutus
evenyoubrutus's picture
Joined: 11/04/2008
MGoPoints: 4734

In the most high and palmy state of Rome,
A little ere the mightiest Julius fell,
The graves stood tenantless, and the sheeted dead
Did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets

Here's to you, Julius.  Your friends betrayed you, but they truly thought what they were doing was tenable justice.

Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more

-Brutus

Not that I loved Rich Rod less, but that I loved Michigan more.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:59 PM | Why is it that our supposedly excellent offense (Score:1)
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2928

scores roughly the same against Wisconsin's defense as MSU/Iowa? Isn't our only claim to fame this year that despite awful defense we have an awesome offense? Where is it against any good team? Where? And why do we, by Denard's own words, "come out flat" in the first half, on senior day and against the #7 team in the country? What is the explanation for that? Argh. Sorry, but I can only say coaching.

"Everyone gets dumped Gabe. Let me give you some advice: a little coverup on your Adams Apple will make it appear smaller. Which will make you appear less like a transvestite." 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:07 PM | With respect to the offense (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12593

With respect to the offense production, it should be noted that the team only had 4 real possession in the first half, and probably left 3-10 points on the field.  The difference between UM and those other two teams is that they could actually, you know, stop Wisconsin and get the ball back.  Plus, the offense you see out there now is short a couple of starting RBs, one of its better Olinemen, and some of the WRs were dinged up.  Definitely some blame should fall on the coaches, but this offense isn't close to the one that we saw even a couple of weeks ago.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:17 PM | Huh? (Score:1)
romeyjdogg
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1207

V. Smith is the starting RB. He was playing the first half. Stonum, Roundtree, and Hemmingham were healthy the first half. Your argument is invalid, sorry.

As much as it sucks, the offense cannot come out flat and expect the defense to help them out. This offensive struggle seems to be the norm against good teams, unfortunately. So maybe now we can accept that the offense is not as bullet proof as everyone is saying. Yes, they have improved, but no they aren't great.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:38 PM | Not having Lewan (Score:1)
caup
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1915

was big.  He has been really good against top DEs this year.  Not having Shaw also hurt us. He was a pivotal contributor against Illinois.  He runs the veer better than any of our other RBs.

The best excuse for the offensive ineptitude in the first halves, I think, is nerves.  They come out tight because they KNOW they have to score on every possession.  When they biff a wide-open play due to nothing except poor execution they get even tighter the next possession.

Go Blue

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 3:09 PM | And youth is part of nerves (Score:1)
CompleteLunacy
CompleteLunacy's picture
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1167

One more year of experience, and this offense starts scoring at all times in the game against everybody, and not just when the opposing team has gained a multi-score lead. That, and somehow fielding an average defense next year will help alleviate the enormous (and unfair) pressure put on the offense to produce every time they get the ball.

I'm not a lunatic. Seriously, i'm not.

Ok, maybe just a little bit. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:52 PM | Smith is the starting RB (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12593

Smith is the starting RB largely because Shaw was hurt, and Odoms is also gone.  Maybe I over-generalized the loss of some playmakers, but now the team is short Gallon and maybe Smith, so the injuries are piling up.  Lewan being out was huge.  So there were some injuries on the offense that certainly contributed to the slow start. 

My point is that, yes, a still-young offense struggled against good defenses, but at least in part that is due to some injuries that have robbed it of some depth. 

Also, let's not act like good defenses don't hold back most good offenses.  OSU was held in check by Wisconsin, then dropped about a hundred points on Purdue and Minny.  They struggled against Iowa and PSU (until PSU started throwing picks).  That is an offense that, statistically at least, is close to UM's.  The offense has certainly regressed a bit, but that is to be expected when you replace BGSU and UMass with Wiscy and Iowa.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 5:20 PM | sure (Score:1)
ahs22
Joined: 10/03/2009
MGoPoints: 18

sure 3-10 points were left on the board but thats been a recurring issue throughout the RR era.  I think a lot of times on this board, turnovers are underestimated as a display of problems with the offense rather than mere instances of bad luck

  • Login or register to post comments
November 22nd, 2010 at 2:02 PM | JESUS GOD RICH RODRIGUEZ WHY (Score:1)
Seth
Seth's picture
Joined: 10/14/2008
MGoPoints: 48336

JESUS GOD RICH RODRIGUEZ WHY DID YOU LET JEREMY GALLON RETURN KICKS AND PUNTS FOR TEN GAMES.

Answer:

BECAUSE DARRYL STONUM, WHO IS OBVIOUSLY OUR BEST KICK RETURNER, IS ALSO OUR BEST DEEP THREAT AND HE MIGHT GET INJURED.

So of course that happened.

(Blogger alias: "Misopogon") This team is under construction. We thank you for your patience.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.