In all of this discussion of Feagin, some people seemed to suggest that RR should have never brought him aboard. I understand their concern if RR knew of the drug dealing and other arrests.
My question is, what are people looking for in character of their recruits? At what point does a recruit's background outweigh the talent he brings to the field?
Do people believe that any hiccup in a kid's past should disqualify him from UM football? Or is there a certain amount of leeway that is allowed?
Certainly kids with questionable backgrounds have been recruited to UM in the past and RR has shown a willingness to bring certain people aboard at WVU (people talk about PacMan and Chris Henry, but they should really look up Pat Lazear). So this is nothing foreign to either UM and RR.
So where is the line? Or is this just simply a situation that must be looked at on a case by case basis?