Puck Preview: Penn State
THE ESSENTIALS
WHAT | Michigan (19-11, 11-5 B10) vs PSU (16-12-4, 8-7-1 B10) |
---|---|
WHERE | Pegula Ice Arena, State College PA |
WHEN | 7 PM Friday 3 PM Saturday |
LINE | nope |
TV | BTN plus (ie: no) |
[@ right: Bill Rapai]
THE THEM
It says something that Penn State's farm-fresh program has become instantly competitive in the Big Ten. Half of that is Penn State, which is regularly selling out and has an attractive hockey-specific arena to offer.
The other half is the worrisome state of the league.
Things seemed a bit more worrisome three weeks ago, when Penn State was 7-2-1 in the Big Ten and had vague at-large hopes. Since they've been in a tailspin, losing five of their last six.
THE GENTLEMEN OF NOTE
-
Taylor Holstrom, Casey Bailey, and David Goodwin. Addressed as a group because they are a group. Penn State has a very legit top line. You can see it in the plus-minus: these guys range from +12 to +14; there's a second-ish line that's just above even, and then you get into minuses.
-
Bailey leads PSU in scoring with a 21-16-37 line. 1) that production has continued in the Big Ten (10-10-20), and 2) a lot of that production is even strength, with just 4 PP goals.
-
Holstrom is the setup man with a 7-22-33 line.
-
Goodwin is a highly productive third wheel at 13-16-29.
PSU has another three or four guys who are somewhat productive depending on whether you're looking at the season as a whole or just the Big Ten. Scoring threat drops off relatively swiftly after that.
Michigan would be advised to try to line-match the Copp line against the Penn State gunners, but that'll be more difficult on the road.
THE GOALIE
All three Penn State goalies have seen significant time this year. Over the last month the competition has narrowed to juniors Matthew Skoff and PJ Musico. Musico has a solid .923 save percentage but has struggled somewhat lately; Skoff is at .905. Despite that disparity, Skoff has seen twice as much time as Musico.
Skoff and Musico both gave up five goals last weekend to Ohio State, so your guess is as good as any. Whoever gets the Friday start will see playing time Saturday contingent on his performance.
THE SPECIAL TEAMS
Penn State's power play is effective at 22%; their penalty kill is weak at 80%. Similar to Michigan except slightly worse in both categories.
THE LAST TIME
PSU and Michigan split a series at Yost back in November. Penn State scraped out a frustrating-for-M 3-2 win in a game they got outshot 40-28. The next night Michigan bombed 'em 8-1 in a game where shots were a lot closer. Hockey is weird.
THE STAKES
Michigan has a three point (ie: one game) lead on Minnesota for the Big Ten title, with MSU and PSU lurking around .500 further back. A sweep guarantees Michigan a piece of the title if they get at least a split from the MSU home and home finale; drop points, as Michigan has been wont to do of late, and they'll be relying on Meh Minnesota to help 'em out. (They've done that, splitting their last two series.)
Even more importantly, Michigan is the definition of a bubble team in the pairwise. They have four games left against .500-ish teams, and three are on the road—going 3-1 in this stretch should see them enter the Big Ten Tourney with a good shot at an at-large bid even if they don't get the auto. Anything worse and things start to look dicey.
If Michigan does end up hunting an auto-bid they would very much like to do so from one of the bye spots in the Big Ten tournament. Two games in two days is much easier than three in three.
Penn State's got a decent record but they've got a very bad SOS number so they're definitely on the outside looking in when it comes to an at-large. They are five points back of second place in the league and the second bye, so that's likely their goal.
THE PREDICTION
If Michigan can keep the top line contained with the Copp line and use Hyman and Larkin to strike at the relatively soft underbelly of the Penn State roster… they could still be undone by randos unchecked in the slot and bad goaltending. But this does look like a relatively good matchup for Michigan: a team that's been scuffling that doesn't punish mistakes much save for the guys everyone needs to be alert for.
Here's hoping they can get 1-0-1 or better.
Will make this weekend easier for sure.
Even with that though, Penn State is good at home and this is one of their biggest home series of the year. I think Michigan's friday night demons will continue to haunt them.
PSU 4-3, Michigan 5-1
Hate to be that guy but Holstrom's line is 7-26-33.
Pretty damn annoying that all these games are on BTN Plus. I thought the new conference was supposed to get a lot of games on the tv.
where I live I also get a "BTN Overflow Channel" ....... why not show some ice hockey there?
I know there are quite a few people who get this "BTN Overflow Channel."
On Wednesday night, things got incredibly stupid. Penn State @ Ohio State basketball ran a little bit long. 2:00 left in the game, Ohio State up 10, which is a significant margin but the game wasn't over yet, stranger things have happened. BTN decided to cut away to the Purdue @ Michigan State game. Which is fine, but then BOTH BTN and the Overflow Channel had Purdue/MSU. Isn't that the point of an Overflow channel --- when a game "goes long"???? (I live in Kentucky, FWIW)
Anyway, TL;DR --- how about officially having a BTN2?
Hockey > women's basketball. In my opinion.
I really do enjoy watching women's sports like softball, volleyball, and soccer but cannot understand the push for networks to air women's basketball. It's terrible.
My only guess is that it's readily available TV that networks use to meet some internal diversity requirement, because it is awful TV. I guarantee you they're not airing it because it gets good ratings.
when it comes to their conference tournaments, Hockey and Women's BB will get equal BTN treatment.
A 1st-round game involving lower-seeded teams, with 150 people in attendance (PSU vs. Wisconsin hockey from Joe Louis Arena!!!) will get broadcast live nationwide on BTN.
Hockey > women's basketball but women's basketball > Dance Moms
because the BTN has been great for me - an out of stater. I know in A2 / Detroit / Michigan, most of Michigan's games used to be on TV, but for me prior to the BTN, I'd have to hope an FSD feed was picked up by FSC Atlantic or something. The BTN (and thus BTN2Go) gets me probably 75% of Michigan's games available for viewing. The only games I can't see this year would be the BTN Plus (and I actually caved and paid for it for this month).
So while I understand Michiganders frustrations, it's been terrific for us out-of-staters
I hope they still don't have the "409" on their uniforms, regardless hopefully we pound them into the ground.
The stickers were initially the idea of the ice hockey coaches --- once it trickled up the AD food chain, they objected and the stickers left.
I wasn't a fan of the stickers at all ...... "tone deaf" is an appropriate adjective for them.
I think the only way to watch the games this weekend to pay $10 for that BTN Plus package and watch the jumbotron feed like when we played at the Big Lots Arena in Columbus. It's crappy coverage and it is on a significant time delay so you can't listen on the Michigan audio feed.
What also sucks is that the game tomorrow is at the same time as the basketball game so I will have to take the ipad to Crisler.
This is big series for us and a could seriously use a sweep.
Go Blue!!!
I bought it before the OSU-jumbotron-feed game so for my month I'll get three games- that one and the two PSU games. For $3.33/game, it's worth to me to see even a crappy feed over listening to radio. Hockey is a bad sport for radio play-by-play
PSU concerns me because they just fire a ton of shots at the net and our goalies are... sketchy.
Ugly game so far...
Exactly may be they will improved.
Not looking tough in net. He hasn't picked up a solid sabe yet, PSU goalie has been impressive.
stellar performance with the season on the line, boys. Crikey...
Comments