Preview: Wisconsin 2016 Comment Count

Brian

Wisconsin-BadgersEssentials

WHAT Wisconsin at Michigan
WHERE Michigan Stadium
Ann Arbor, MI
WHEN 3:30 Eastern
October 1st, 2016
THE LINE Michigan –10.5
TELEVISION ABC
TICKETS From $106
WEATHER overcast, mid-60s
probably some drizzle
 
PFF grades provided by Pro Football Focus.

Overview

Wisconsin is in an odd place on Michigan's schedule, as this is the first time I can remember that there's a nonconference game after the start of—

what's that now
they are?
how many damn teams does this conference have now

Anyway. The Certainly Part Of The Big Ten Wisconsin Badgers come to Michigan Stadium for the first time since people rode dinosaurs to the discotheque. They're coming off two hot-hot-hot wins over Certainly Top Ten Teams LSU and Michigan State. They're riding high with a legitimately terrifying defense and... an offense. That's not bad, per se. It's good for one 17 play touchdown drive a game. Anyway, the defense!

Run Offense vs Wisconsin

3979166

Sheehy(94) is the star on the line

The loss of star OLB Vince Biegel is a huge blow to the Badgers. Biegel and fellow OLB TJ Watt are far and away Wisconsin's best defensive players; without him it seems like Wisconsin will move Jack Cichy, he of the three straight sacks in the bowl game, to OLB and bring in one of the backup ILBs they're already rotating.

That shift seriously dents what is probably the best linebacker corps in the nation. Wisconsin runs a 3-4, so there are four of them; PFF has all of them +2.5 or better, with Biegel at +7.4 and Watt at +8.3. UW's given four other LBs significant snaps so far this year, so Biegel's replacement won't be fresh off the turnip truck. Whoever it is will be a massive downgrade.

As far as the run game goes, Michigan has to be looking at planet-sized nose tackle Olive Sagapolu with some concern after struggling against Colorado's Josh Tupou. Ace doesn't think it'll be a thing, though:

Up front, Sheehy was easily the most impressive lineman. NT Olive Sagapolu is a massive 340 pounds, but I don't think he'll give Mason Cole nearly as much trouble as Colorado's immovable NT Josh Tupou. Sagapolu didn't hold up too well to double-teams; LJ Scott didn't have much opportunity to establish himself because of the score, but when he had success it came right up the gut:

That was also a rare instance of Sheehy getting handled one-on-one. The other starting DE, Chikwe Obasih, is undersized for a 3-4 at 267 pounds and looked it for much of this game. Even for a 3-4 DE, his production is really lacking—no tackles in this game, only three (two solo) on the year—and he was the lineman most easily taken on and moved out of his lane by single blocking.

Connor Sheehy is a very legit 3-4 DE, albeit a guy who offers nothing rushing the passer. The other two guys are just kind of there.

Despite this, Wisconsin battered MSU into meek submission and held Leonard Damn Fournette in relative check. This is because linebackers, mostly. TJ Watt is a fullback-destroying missile, and everyone in that unit grades out positively.

Wisconsin comes up against a Michigan run offense that got right in a big way against Penn State, with four running backs all ripping off big chunk runs en route to over 300 yards. Issues abounded before that, however, and promise to crop up once again now that Michigan is playing a team with (mostly) first teamers in the front seven. Previous versions of the Michigan run offense under Harbaugh have taken one step back for every one forward. Consistent production this Saturday would be a game-changer for season expectations, but seems unlikely. Michigan will get some yards. Michigan will get stuffed more than they care to.

Wild card: Jabrill Peppers. With Noah Furbush back and Wisconsin inclined to run on first down this is a game where you can buy Peppers a bunch of offensive snaps by running an actual 4-3 on some downs. Even if they do keep him out there all the time, this is a game where 8-10 Peppers touches could contain in them the seed of a critical touchdown.

KEY MATCHUP: MASON COLE versus OLIVE SAGAPOLU and MICHIGAN'S OL IN GENERAL against CHIP AND RELEASE ON ZONE RUNS. This is kind of the same thing. Michigan would like to mitigate the big damn nose tackle. Mason Cole had major issues against Tupou and needs to do better against a not as good version, and the line as a whole needs to actually hit guys before releasing to the second level when they run zone stuff.

[Hit THE JUMP for CERTAINLY AN OFFENSE]

Pass Offense vs Wisconsin

160903FB-0584-42

Watt, Wisconsin, repeat

This will be all about protecting Wilton Speight and what happens when Michigan doesn't. Biegel's absence will be hugely helpful:

With Biegel out, Watt and rotation DL Alec James are the only Badgers with positive pass rush grades per PFF. That's a huge dent in their productivity, one that Wisconsin will hope to replace by getting more aggressive with Cichy. Survey says: possible but relatively unknown. Cichy's three sacks against USC were impressive but this year he's got a slightly negative rush grade; he's mostly made his hay with excellent coverage and good run D.

MSU was baffled by the vast array of blitzes Wisconsin deployed from their 3-4, and Michigan has shown a certain weakness in that department as well. They're going to get through on a semi-regular basis, and Michigan has to hope that Speight is able to continue his wily ways to escape pressure and get checkdown yards. The alternative is a replay of the sack-strip-fumble-TD against Colorado and is Michigan's most obvious path to defeat. A Michigan team that gets down early because of turnovers created by pass rush and has to come back with a jittery and possibly wounded Speight is in tough.

The Wisconsin secondary has graded out well so far per PFF, with four of five major contributors positive. Safety D'Cota Dixon is the exception mostly thanks to some run issues. The corner trio of Sojourn Shelton, Derrick Tindal, and Lubern Figaro have all been good in coverage. Opponent caveats do apply, but LSU's WRs are excellent if completely underutilized.

Michigan's end of this is... fine, I guess. Speight bounced back from a bad Colorado game to be efficient, if worryingly inaccurate, against Penn State. Michigan's receiver trio has been good so far, with the notable exception of an uninvolved Jehu Chesson. Pass protection has been mostly fine except for some blitz issues and Colorado getting after Grant Newsome.

KEY MATCHUP: GRANT NEWSOME versus TJ WATT. Watt's still a beast and while Michigan can expect him to come most of the time with Biegel out, he's good enough to win despite being picked up. Newsome meanwhile had his hiccups against Colorado and will be tested repeatedly by not only Watt but a truckload of other guys.

Run Defense vs Wisconsin

image_handler

Ramcyzk is PFF top ranked tackle

We have a pretty good idea what happens when Wisconsin goes up against a good defense. LSU is #7 in S&P+; MSU is #21. In both those games Wisconsin ran about 60% of the time, acquired just over 300 yards, and scored ~14 points with their offense*. Michigan is #2 in S&P+.

As far as the ground game goes, much depends on the health of the Wisconsin line. Jon Dietzen and Micah Kapoi are questionable for Saturday per the official Wisconsin injury report. If neither can go the line will be the same as it was against MSU. That means sophomore Brett Connors at center, and the untimely demise of same. Ace:

On multiple occasions, Connors moved to the second level without providing a chip on a DT who one of the guards could not reach without help; this is something Brian has brought up when talking about Kyle Kalis's issues in the past, and it's a great way to cede a TFL. He'd also had a couple flat-out whiffs on DTs lined up right over him.

He was worse as a pass-blocker.

Wisconsin has had awful injury luck on the offensive line, with a ton of guys washing out of the program altogether. They've just about put together an effective starting five, but the dropoff after the starters is steep.

Michigan will still get challenged either way. They've gone up against four straight spread teams to start the year. Wisconsin is a hard shift in the other direction. It's not one that'll shock Michigan, which goes up against manball every day in practice, but their approach so far this year has been to run a 4-2-5 defense with Jabrill Peppers as a SAM linebacker. The spreads have not tested that.

Meanwhile, PFF has LT Ryan Ramczyk as their #1 OT in the country both on the ground and overall. Michael Dieter (+6.3) and Beau Benzschawel also grade out(+4.3) very well. Wisconsin has four tight ends who play and while none of them are maulers they are all massive steps up from Mike Gesicki. Troy Fumagalli has been omnipresent when healthy and is +1. That's a wee bit different than Gesicki's freshman Funchess impression. Like Michigan, the Badgers rotate fullbacks, and PFF likes both. This unit is a huge step up from anyone Michigan's seen so far this year.

However, there are a couple of weak points. RT Jacob Maxwell's grading out negatively against both run and pass, and that last spot has been an issue no matter who mans it. Wisconsin will find it hard to hide those trouble spots against a Michigan defensive front that has stars across it and a set of incredibly active defensive tackles—both Ryan and Matt Godin have sideline to sideline range, as strange as that is to say. PFF also doesn't think much of any of Wisconsin's backs.

The results so far this year have been decidedly mediocre, with the weak points overwhelming the positives. Corey Clement had a 22-yard run against MSU and averaged 1.5 YPC on his other 22 caries. With Clement sidelined against Georgia State, three Wisconsin backs combined to average 3.8 YPC on 42 carries. UW managed a respectable day against LSU and Dare Ogunbowale had a solid per-carry average against MSU. Other than that and a hamblasting of Akron it's been kind of grim.

While there's significant uncertainty because Michigan hasn't played a team like this, yet, Wisconsin's track record suggests that they won't be doing much against this Michigan front. All it takes is one busted block to submarine most plays, and no matter where the sore spots are along the Wisconsin front, Michigan has a dude ready to exploit them. With Wisconsin lacking much big-play capability—they're 71st in 10+ yard runs, 84th in 20+, and 95th in 30+—they're not likely to have a breakout run that gets their stats up to okay despite the slog it'll be most of the day.

*[Wisconsin had a fumble return TD and a five yard TD drive off a dropped punt snap against MSU. They also had a couple of short field goal drives against LSU set up by an LSU fumble and a failed fourth-and-one conversion.]

KEY MATCHUP: TACO CHARLTON and RASHAN GARY against POWER O. Gonna see a lot of it since asking the iffy bits of the UW line to zone is asking for a Glasgow party in the backfield. Wormley will be fine. Charlton and Gary—I'm guessing Winovich is limited to passing downs in this one—are bigger question marks. I mean, they'll probably be fine. But if there's a weak spot on the DL it's those guys holding up to double team hammerings.

Pass Defense vs Wisconsin

MJS UW Football Practice_Green Bay0090.jpg

Hornibrook is new enough that most shots are from practice

It's exceedingly rare for anyone who's already beaten a top ten team to voluntarily switch quarterbacks, but that's what Wisconsin did midway through their struggle against Georgia State. Bart Houston, the rootin'-est, tootin'-est quarterback east of the Pecos river, exited with 18 attempts and just 91 passing yards; redshirt freshman Alex Hornibrook entered, threw for ten yards an attempt, and has seemingly grabbed the job for good.

Hornibrook was shepherded through the MSU matchup, throwing mostly on third down and frequently at Demetrious Cox. Almost half of his completions came against Michigan State's boat anchor at safety; Hornibrook went 7/8 on attempts at him. The eighth was an interception that Cox dropped. Wisconsin passed on just 6 of 22 first downs.

Hornibrook tended to get his work done by feathering in spooky accurate passes to mostly covered receivers:

This is good. It could turn bad in a hurry if throws like this completion...

...end up being beginner's luck rather than the dawning of an heir to Tom Brady. Also it must be stated that MSU's secondary is still heavily in question; all it took for ND to surge back in their game against the Spartans was constant throwing on every down.

Wisconsin leans heavily on its top three receivers. Those are Fumagalli, the tight end, and wide receivers Robert Wheelwright and Jazz Peavy. Wheelwright is a bulky 6'3" guy with downfield jump-ball abilities but not a ton of ability to separate. Peavy is a smaller, quicker guy. He's had a few drops and is only bringing in 52% of his targets; he's a bit boom or bust. The other two have reliable hands, especially Fumagalli.

Michigan's pass defense has been impregnable aside from a bunch of slants Colorado hit. This is a different situation with a crowded middle of the field and Jourdan Lewis, so those issues are not likely to recur. One thing that may translate for UW as the Michigan linebacker level overreacting to play action. It's easy to see Fumagalli popping open repeatedly for chunks.

Other than that each dropback will be a calculated risk. Wisconsin's been middling at protecting their QB; Michigan is the top havoc rate defense in the country; Hornibrook is a redshirt freshman going up against a Don Brown defense that will have guys pop up out of nowhere.

Weird things happen and Michigan has been bust-prone so far this season, but the default actions here are going to be successful chunk plays to Fumagalli on play action and heavily contested, possibly dangerous throws from a quarterback under siege on frequent passing downs.

KEY MATCHUP: DELANO HILL, JABRILL PEPPERS, and DYMONTE THOMAS versus FUMAGALLI SHORT and PEAVY LONG. Peavy's their best chance at a field-flipping play and Fumagalli's their best shot at a third down conversion. Both of those come down to the safeties not busting assignments.

Special Teams

The other big injury news this week was Wisconsin kicker Rafael Gaglianone getting knocked out for the season. He also missed last week's game; senior walk-on Alex Endicott replaced him. Endicott missed an extra point and hit his first FGA of his career, a 41-yarder hit in the third quarter with Wisconsin already up 20-6. While that was straight down the middle, Wisconsin seemed to be trying to avoid field goals. (Alternative explanation: Paul Chryst is good at fourth down decisions.)

The rest of Wisconsin's special teams have been middling. They have one 15 yard punt return and nothing else in the return game; their kickoff guy gets touchbacks 60% of the time; they've given up four returns on 13 punts, one of which Akron returned for a touchdown. Those punts are short: UW is averaging under 40 yards a punt. Ace reports that Wisconsin is a pro-style punting team. Which... dude.

Michigan's had some issues here with Kenny Allen's mysterious affliction. Michigan eschewed a bunch of long-ish field goals last week to go for it on fourth down. One of those was fourth and seven and very probably a FGA if Michigan had confidence in Allen; Harbaugh did not after watching him warm up. (Neither did your author.) He's still kicking off and punting so whatever it is can't be too bad; that's something to keep an eye on.

Michigan's punting has also been iffy. They've returned to pro-style punting themselves and gave up a couple chunk returns to Colorado. (Michigan punted once against PSU.) Lower that usual sample sizes there, but they look set to give Wisconsin a shot at a return.

The rest of Michigan's special teams have been terrific. They've blocked five kicks, gotten three huge returns from Peppers, who's averaging 23 yards a pop on punts, and given up nothing on kickoffs. 

KEY MATCHUP: JABRILL PEPPERS versus A PRO STYLE PUNTING TEAM. You guys.

Intangibles

tumblr_lu3d39k9Ph1r3cmgco1_400

Cheap Thrills

Worry if...

  • Hornibrook is indeed the second coming of Tom Brady and continues his trend of delicately placed balls just past the outstretched hands of coverage.
  • The absence of Gaglianone causes Chryst to go for the fourth downs he should go for.
  • Speight gets a couple missiles to his midsection early.

Cackle with knowing glee if...

  • Michigan's defensive line is in Wisconsin's base.
  • The running backs repeat their PSU performance.
  • Oh my God they're going to pro style punt at Jabrill Peppers

Fear/Paranoia Level: 5 (Baseline 5; +1 for Two Top Ten Wins, –1 for Against Teams Headed For 7-5, +1 for They Get After The QB, –1 for Their Injury Situation Is Deeply Unfortunate For Them, +1 for Even So This Is A Defense The Likes Of Which Michigan Has Not Seen Yet, +1 for Also They Have Many Manballers Who Are Good, –1 for QB In His Second Start Against Rampant Defense, –1 for Are You Going To Manball The Manballers?)

Desperate need to win level: 10 (Baseline 5; +1 for Wisconsin Fans Are Really Mad About Michigan For Some Reason And I Find This Annoying Since The Teams Haven't Played Since 1880, +1 for Given Big Ten Schedules I Assume That This Is For 40 Years Worth Of Bragging Rights, +1 for Some Stakes On This Season, Yup, +1 for Think Of The Internal Discussions At The Wall Street Journal, +1 for Remember That Guy Who Tried To Tear Steve Breaston's ACL? Screw That Guy!)

Loss will cause me to... shame-eat six pounds of cheese.

Win will cause me to... yell "GUESS YOU'RE NOT THE SECOND CHROMING" at Paul Chryst as he exits the field.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

Despite the loss of Biegel I expect the Wisconsin defense to keep Michigan relatively in check. Last week offers some hope they'll be able to grind it a bit; I'll have to see it to believe that Michigan's having a genuinely good outing against a tough run defense.

Speight remains a wildcard; the UCF version of him could get picked off a few times and set Wisconsin up to score without having to drive the field. I'd be fine with a game exactly like the PSU game. I'll take inaccurate incompletions even if they result in a punt.

On the other side of the ball it should be boa constrictor time. Wisconsin struggled with an MSU defensive line that's good but not Michigan's caliber, and Michigan doesn't have a big blinking THROW AT ME sign in the secondary. Hornibrook should be under a ton of pressure and figures to have at least a few moments he reacts badly; the Wisconsin ground game won't go anywhere.

A lot of punting is on the docket, with Michigan getting more extended drives. In a game of field position, Jabrill Peppers is a huge edge over Not Jabrill Peppers, and that should lead to a comfortable win.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:

  • Peppers takes back another punt.
  • Jake Butt goes over 100 yards receiving.
  • Wisconsin averages under three yards a carry.
  • Michigan, 26-11.

Comments

lhglrkwg

September 30th, 2016 at 2:57 PM ^

I am terrifyingly in agreement with Dear Leader. This looks like it shoould be a slow but comfortable win for that reason I am terrified I'm missing something. I think the key factor is new quarterback vs unending pressure. Wouldnt surprise me to see him throw up an extremely ill advised pick 6 under pressure. Gonna be there tomorrow for the first time in a few years! Go blue!

ggoodness56

September 30th, 2016 at 2:58 PM ^

Perhaps some trickery on the offensive side of the ball to loosen things up a bit? 

 

It would be nice to put some of these linebackers on skates. All of these guys bearing down on Speight scares me. 

reshp1

September 30th, 2016 at 3:05 PM ^

I don't know if Clement's YPC is a function of his OL or his ability, but he looks legit to me. Hard to bring down, and has a quick burst and enough change of direction to keep from taking tackle attempts square. I'm actually kind of scared of him. 

Defensively, I don't think Wisconsin has faced an offense capable of throwing the ball yet. Part of that is their QB pressure, but a lot is opponent ineptitude. Will their front 7 be able to stay as aggressive as they've been if there's a threat of getting passes thrown over them? Can their corners and safeties manage against our WR corps with a QB that can actually make some throws? I have a feeling they get exposed a bit this game.

stephenrjking

September 30th, 2016 at 3:30 PM ^

"Defensively, I don't think Wisconsin has faced an offense capable of throwing the ball yet."

The pessimist in me suggests that we cannot yet know whether or not this will remain true after tomorrow.

Speight seems steps above O'Connor, of course, and the LSU QB position is a federal disaster area, but our downfield game hasn't exactly lit the world on fire yet. Keep in mind that Oregon, while using a different offense, still lit up Colorado through the air in ways Michigan did not come close to.

dragonchild

September 30th, 2016 at 4:15 PM ^

Speight's inaccuracy vs. PSU is a cause for concern, but there's a mounting body of evidence that Speight was dinged up in the Colorado game.  So, that's an outlier that can be safely dismissed.

The thing I'm wondering about is, with Speight playing as badly as he did against Colorado, were O'Korn and Morris THAT far behind him?  That this was never a 3-way race at all?  They didn't look bad during the Spring game.  I'm not quick to advocate pulling the starting QB just for a few bad plays, but against Colorado, Speight was downright awful and obviously hurt.  Our #2 and #3 are that unviable?  Because if Wisconsin lands a few hits, I don't think the stuff we did against Colorado will be as effective.

PhillipFulmersPants

September 30th, 2016 at 5:07 PM ^

that he wanted to see how Speight would respond, gut it out ... let his teammates see him tough through the pain and challenge?  Earn their faith and trust?  

You could be right and the coaches didn't have much faith in the two guys behind him. Hope that's not the case for depth reasons.  But at any rate, Harbaugh's explanation - he strikes me as the kind of coach who would do that type of thing, particularly with the QB position.  

Agree it would likely be an entirely different proposition if they tried it against a defense like Wisconsin's.  

 

reshp1

September 30th, 2016 at 4:26 PM ^

Speight had maybe one half where he was anywhere near as bad as Harris and O'Connor were in their games against Wisconsin. Harris got benched for a Purdue transfer and O'Connor has looked almost as bad against other defenses, good and bad. So, I think it's safe to say those guys are just bad and it wasn't Wisconsin making them look bad. 

Meanwhile, for all the issues Speight has had, his overall numbers are good to excellent and he has made some great throws to offset the bad ones. He also has been very adept at handling pressure and finding his checkdowns. It's impossible to say how he will handle Wisconsin's pressure since we too have not really faced competition that good, but the data available looks positive to me. Getting drilled and then having to finish the game hurt against a decent defense in CO is about as much adversity as a QB can face and he mostly passed. 

I think his output will drop as you would expect against a step up in competition level, but I'm not worried about it falling off a cliff entirely either. That's probably good enough win if he avoids the big, game changing mistakes/turnovers.

 

EDIT: I also believe our receiving targets are better than anything Wisconsin has faced. Between Darboh, Chesson, Perry, Butt, and even Hill, we'll have a versatile bunch of eligible receivers attacking all over the field on any given play. 

FrankMurphy

September 30th, 2016 at 3:05 PM ^

One thing I didn't see mentioned: Butt, Chesson, and Darboh are 6'6", 6'3", and 6'2", while Wisconsin doesn't have a starting DB taller than 5'11". So our receivers could have a big game if Speight can evade the pass rush and get them the ball. 

Phinaeus Gage

September 30th, 2016 at 3:15 PM ^

Our offense is a little better than theirs. Our defense is a little better than theirs. Our special teams are definitely better than theirs. Our coaching staff is better than theirs. The only way we lose is turnovers. If we win that battle, I expect an early grind turning into a comfortable victory.

UMProud

September 30th, 2016 at 3:19 PM ^

Great write up and the homer in me is definitely sort of concerned about the W defensive unit.  This game should let us know what type of OLine we truly have.

Also always appreciate your sense of humor in these posts it leavens the readability!

PopeLando

September 30th, 2016 at 3:20 PM ^

A billion jet sweeps, daring them to be faster to the corners than us? Wisconsin may be death up the middle, but they looked not so great to the outside vs MSU. Maybe they weren't scared of the MSU offense...

Alumnus93

September 30th, 2016 at 3:21 PM ^

what a relief it is to see us perpetually favore by double digits. sure beats seeing hokes teams as perpetual underdogs

Ronnie Kaye

September 30th, 2016 at 3:27 PM ^

When is the last time "desperation level to win" wasn't a 10 with five jokes added to the baseline? Just eliminate that section.

GoBlue C4

September 30th, 2016 at 3:38 PM ^

Michigan's offense is better, Michigan's defense is better, Michigan's coaching is better and Michigan is playing at home. 27-13 Michigan, and I'm only giving them 13 because I think Wisconsin gets 1 short field off a turnover

gbdub

September 30th, 2016 at 3:51 PM ^

I can't say I watched super closely, and pore-o-vision, but it seemed like Sparty had a number of good opportunities against the Wisconson secondary. Trouble was O'Connor couldn't hit them, and when he did, he was inaccurate enough that the receivers couldn't do much with it after the catch (then again Speight had that latter problem against PSU as well).

Michigan has better receivers than MSU, and unlike LSU we're willing to use them. I think the chances will be there if Speight can hit tem.

 

reshp1

September 30th, 2016 at 4:48 PM ^

I saw this too. The safety was slow to come over the top on a few occasions and receiver had a good cushion on the corner. That's a tough throw to make, but it was there. There were some throws O'Connor actually did make underneath that look promising for Butt and Perry to exploit. 

Stringer Bell

September 30th, 2016 at 4:22 PM ^

This game won't be close.  Wisconsin beat a now unranked LSU team in essentially a home game, then beat maybe a top 25 MSU team in a game that was much closer than the score indicates.  Michigan is by far the best team they'll have played, and it will show.  Michigan wins by 20.

Lefthighkick

September 30th, 2016 at 5:45 PM ^

is the reason I'll be sleeping soundly tonight. This has all the makings of a dogfight, give me the team that figures to get a huge boost in field position off of kickoffs and punt returns.

24-10 Michigan.

I Love Lamp

September 30th, 2016 at 7:20 PM ^

Hawaii and UCF were foregone conclusions. Colorado terrified me. PSU was similar to Hawaii and UCF. Wisconsin scares me, but not like Colorado. I really don't think they have the horses to keep up with us. I believe their D will cut our scoring roughly in half, but they will have a rough time scoring more than 14. Turnovers are key. We take care of the ball, we take care of business. I'm looking at a score similar to Brian's, 27-10 good guys

uminks

September 30th, 2016 at 10:51 PM ^

I'm sure he's saving some plays for @ MSU and @ IA but will let it all out against @ OSU. It would not surprise me if we see O'Korn for stretches in this game along with the wildcat. I've heard O'Korn has been doing very well in practice the last two weeks and usually Harbaugh likes to play people who practice well.

TheCool

September 30th, 2016 at 11:11 PM ^

If Speight plays well to very good we win easily.

If Speight plays just ok it'll be closer yet comfortable victory.

If Speight plays poorly the game will be close.

This is what I think with the exception of there being a lot of a combination of turnovers/big plays/terrible calls etc.

Alumnus93

October 1st, 2016 at 9:12 AM ^

the utter lack of deep ball to Chesson makes me wonder if Harbaugh has been leaving it off tape, just for this or the msu game. Chesson just crushed the Florida cb and haven't seen it since...