Preview: Penn State Comment Count

Ace

THE ESSENTIALS

WHAT Michigan (16-5, 6-2 B1G) vs
Penn State (11-10, 2-6)
WHERE Madison Square Garden
New York, New York
WHEN Noon ET, Saturday
LINE Michigan -7 (KenPom)
TV BTN
PBP: Gus Johnson
Analyst: Jon Crispin

Right: Michigan won the first leg with ease. [Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog]

THE US

Caris LeVert is "unlikely" to return to the court tomorrow, though John Beilein said this afternoon that he's been doing more in practice.

Also of note from Beilein's presser today: he said either DJ Wilson or Kam Chatman needs to step up so the main members of the rotation can get more rest.

THE LINEUP CARD

Projected starters are in bold. Hover over headers for stat explanations. The "Should I Be Mad If He Hits A Three" methodology: we're mad if a guy who's not good at shooting somehow hits one. Yes, you're still allowed to be unhappy if a proven shooter is left open. It's a free country.

Pos. # Name Yr. Ht./Wt. %Min %Poss SIBMIHHAT
G 33 Shep Garner (inj.) So. 6'1, 185 86 23 No
Nominal point is more of a scorer. Shooting better from 3 than 2.
G 3 Devin Foster Sr. 6'2, 205 50 13 No
Low usage, bad finisher (21/47 2P) and FT shooter, turnover-prone.
F 0 Payton Banks (inj.) So. 6'6, 220 71 22 Yes
Decent finisher and rebounder, iffy outside shooter.
F 10 Brandon Taylor Sr. 6'6, 225 80 28 No
Huge usage, middling efficiency (47/35/72 shooting splits).
C 44 Julian Moore So. 6'10, 235 41 16 Very
Good rebounder and decent rim-protector, draws fouls and hits FTs.
C 32 Jordan Dickerson Sr. 7'1, 245 44 11 Very
Top-25 block rate, excellent offensive rebounder, low usage.
F 1 Deividas Zemgulis Fr. 6'6, 220 30 15 Yes
Good scorer inside arc, but only 8/31 on threes.
F 5 Donovon Jack Sr. 6'9, 210 33 19 Kinda
Decent inside-outside scorer, but turnover-prone and huge foul rate.

Penn State has undergone some lineup changes since they visited Crisler a few weeks back. Sophomore Julian Moore took the starting center job from senior Jordan Dickerson, starting guard Josh Reaves is out with mono, and two more starters—including PSU's top guard—are banged up:

Garner's absense would be significant; not only is he their lead guard, but he plays a whopping 86% of the team's minutes and PSU is already thin in the backcourt.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the preview.]

THE THEM

Modified from the last PSU game preview.

Penn State's top dog is forward Brandon Taylor, who takes nearly 30% of the team's shots when he's on the floor, and while he's not deadly he's relatively effective at 47% shooting inside the arc and 35% from three. Taylor draws just under six fouls per game and makes 72% of his free throws. He'll draw Zak Irvin in a matchup of undersized fours that can stuff the stat sheet.

Sophomore Shep Garner is the nominal point guard on a team that doesn't have anyone who truly fits the profile. Garner's had a tough time finding his shot in Big Ten play; while he's at 82% from the line with a solid FT rate, he's making 40% of his twos and 26% of his threes. With Reaves out and Garner questionable, freshman Isaiah Washington, who's 8/35 from the field this season, might get a much larger share of the minutes than normal.

Sophomore wing Payton Banks does solid work on the boards and can finish inside the arc, but he's hoisting a lot of threes that aren't going in (20/74 3P), and now he's dealing with a back issue. Manning the middle is 6'10" sophomore Julian Moore, who's started the last three games over seven-footer Jordan Dickerson, one of the nation's best shot-blockers and a force on the offensive glass. Moore is fourth in the conference in defensive rebounding; otherwise his numbers don't match up with Dickerson's.

THE RESUME

Michigan thumped PSU by 23 at Crisler in the first meeting of these teams. Since then, the Nittany Lions have gone 2-4 in Big Ten games with wins over Minnesota and Northwestern. They gave Wisconsin a game at home, but were blown out by MSU, Purdue, and Ohio State.

THE TEMPO-FREE

Conference-only numbers.


Four Factors explanation

The PSU offense relied on second chances and minimizing turnovers to cover for sub-par shooting in non-conference play; their efficiency has been further hampered now that they're tenth in the conference in turnover rate, though they still get to the line quite often. Their shooting remains bad, especially from three, where they languishing under 30% in conference games.

The Nittany Lions force an average number of turnovers and are 11th in the B1G in the other three main defensive categories. They've been lit up from the outside; B1G opponents are hitting 39% of their threes.

THE KEYS

Make them earn it. Penn State isn't a good shooting team, so they lean hard on their free-throw shooting, getting 24% of their points at the line—more than any other Big Ten team. Michigan, of course, is notoriously foul-averse under Beilein, and outside of Brandon Taylor (6/6 FT) they did a good job in the first matchup of forcing PSU to make shots from the field. With the way this team shoots, there's no reason to give them freebies.

Run that high screen. I had this as a key the last time around and Mark Donnal scored 16 points on 7/10 FG while Zak Irvin tallied seven assists. So, yeah, do that again.

Find that last rotation guy. If Beilein is serious about getting Wilson or Chatman more minutes to save the legs of the rest of the rotation, this is the game to do it with Indiana and MSU looming next week. Wilson looks closer to being able to make a positive contribution; he's slowly but surely picking up how to play more like a big man. If he's capable of giving Irvin a breather at the four without too much of a dropoff, that'd be huge for this team. 

THE SECTION WHERE I PREDICT THE SAME THING KENPOM DOES

Michigan by 7.

The Wolverines manhandled PSU in their first meeting and the Nittany Lions are less healthy now than they were then. If Garner can't go, this should be a gimme game, and hopefully one in which Beilein can safely tinker with the rotation.

ELSEWHERE

UMHoops preview. Maize n Brew preview.

Comments

bklein09

January 29th, 2016 at 5:10 PM ^

Maybe it accounts for the uninspiring games against Minny and Rutgers where we didn't come anywhere close to the lofty spread?

Not trying to be overly critical, but this is a neutral site game and we are a team still missing it's best player. We could easily blow their doors off again, or we could get into a dogfight and come out on the wrong end. Mostly depends on how we shoot at MSG.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

AC1997

January 29th, 2016 at 5:09 PM ^

I have to disagree a little with your thoughts on Wilson.  I think what they actually need for him is to play more to the mid-range and athletic guy he is.  Sometimes he acts like he's Duncan Robinson out there and that's not where he is as a player.  They need him to be more like GR3 was - a mid-range and baseline guy who limited his outside jumpers.  

Also, he's vanished from the rotation the last couple of games after getting early minutes.  I think they've been trying to move him to the 4 spot as they have three other guys at the 5 and want to be prepared for match-ups that will strain Irvin/Dawkins/Robinson at the F spots.  But why hasn't he played lately?  

Also, why HAS Chatman played?  Hopefully they're rewarding him for good practices, but he's been so bad on the court that they have to quickly pull him again.  It's clear Beilein wants a true PF option to emerge so they're not constantly playing a 6'6" shooter in that spot......but I haven't seen anything from either player except maybe 5 minutes of Wilson that suggests they're ready.  We're going to need them.....

umchicago

January 29th, 2016 at 6:58 PM ^

JB always wants a shooter in that #4 spot.  that's why chatman doesn't play.  his outside shot is horrible.  wilson hit some 3s earlier in the year but has been poor since. that's why he doesn't play any more either.

if either guy could shoot, they would get 10 min at the #4.

AlwaysBlue

January 29th, 2016 at 11:39 PM ^

true. Beilein has said that he doesn't care about offense from Chatman right now. He needs him to play defense and make the right pass on offense. I suspect Wilson is having the same problems.

AC1997

January 29th, 2016 at 5:11 PM ^

I think if Levert doesn't get any time in the big games next week we need to officially worry.  I have no doubt that Michigan is being extra careful after getting burned last year with so many injuries that they may not have been as cautious with as warranted, but this is going on a month now.  I was hoping he would be able to play a few minutes against PSU to shake off the rust.  Now I'm to the point where I hope he can provide a 10 minute spark against Indiana and maybe a little more agianst MSU.  

MGoDoughnut

January 29th, 2016 at 6:04 PM ^

Not saying Beilein owes fans an explanation for Caris' health status, but feels like he's been saying "Caris is looking great" for more than a month, which suggests that Caris has not, in fact, looked great

scottiek65

January 30th, 2016 at 12:51 PM ^

Anyone else feel like we are getting injury reports on Caris like its the NHL Playoffs?? how the NHL Hockey clubs always say "Lower Body Injury" and nothing more. 

when i saw that game, it didnt look like a bad ankle sprain it was just an awkward turn and landing on the break. I think now it was worse than it looked then. I think Caris returns for Indiana Tuesday. 

MarkleyNJ

January 29th, 2016 at 6:26 PM ^

Thanks for the write-up Ace.

Hopefully, we start out getting  a big lead, and get some players on the bench some playing time and confidence.  

If we can hit just an average number of 3s, our offense really flows.   Do not look forward to a nail-biter.

Would love to see Aubrey build off the spark he provided last game, for Zak to continue providing his all-around game, and for Derrick to get us in the fast-break.

Will be there tomorrow at MSG with my son cheering on the Maize and Blue. 

Go Blue!

Jason Kapsner …

January 29th, 2016 at 8:17 PM ^

How much time does Pat Chambers have left at PSU? He's in his fifth season and the team has never once shown any sign of leaving the B1G basement. Are they content with being completely hopeless in one of the revenue sports?

NittanyFan

January 29th, 2016 at 8:47 PM ^

Setting the scene, I'll go back in PSU b-ball history: PSU hoops was actually solid (although not great)  under Bruce Parkhill for the 1st half of thee 1990s.  Finished strong in the A-10, then was a viable mid-tier B1G team in 2 of the 3 years Parkhill coached in the B1G. 

But Parkhill quit and then-assistant Jerry Dunn took over.  Dunn was TERRIBLE except for the 1 year he had the Crispin brothers draining shots from 40 feet out and PSU made the Sweet 16.  Dunn was coach for 8 years.  The fact that he was terrible was pretty obvious to me from year 1, and the program really declined long-term.  But PSU didn't care and Dunn got 8 years and even when he was fired, it was almost a reluctant firing.

Then Ed DeChellis was coach.  He got 8 years too.  Losing seasons in each of his first 5 years before he had an NIT Championship year in Year 6 and went to the NCAA in Year 8.  Then he left for a Patriot League school (!!!!), and in so many words he basically said "I'm leaving because this program gets little administrative support."

So that's the "ambient environment" in which Chambers operates.  As long as he doesn't embarass the school or anything, he can probably go 13-17 for another 3-4 years and collect some nice paychecks before PSU might actually do something.  

PSU DOES have some decent recruits coming in in 2016-17, so we'll see.  But as for the rest of this year: PSU will do as it usually does, pull an isolated upset somewhere along the line and end-up in 11th or 12th place.  Same old, same old.

snarling wolverine

January 29th, 2016 at 10:54 PM ^

Hair seems to be critical to the success of PSU coaches.  First, Parkhill and his luxurious mane seemed to have the program on good footing...

...but then there was Dunn, whose hairline receded quickly...

  

...and then DeChellis, barely hanging on to a few strands:

 

...and finally Chambers, for whom the follicle battle has been surrendered.

The Samson effect in evidence?

 

NittanyFan

January 29th, 2016 at 11:40 PM ^

there's no doubt Parkhill was paying $150 for haircuts back in the day.

His hair may have also helped him with the PSU co-eds.  That was always the story from those in the know (my roommate was the b-ball head student manager).

In that picture you posted (it's from the mid-1980s), you can see that Dunn ONCE had hair.  Dunn lost that battle.  The other guy is actually Brian Hill ---- the future Orlando NBA coach.  Parkhill definitely had a good assistant there: he plucked him from Lehigh.

Another good thing about the pictures: while Parkhill has a controlled look that says "my players are running my offense in an efficient manner", the other 3 have looks that say "what on Earth is happening out there?!?  Stop turning the ball over!!!"  

Good stuff!

SagNasty

January 30th, 2016 at 11:07 AM ^

Get this win and get to 7-2 in the conference. Pretty good first half of season considering the injury to Caris. I still think 10-8 and conference would get them in the tournament but that would mean a 3-6 finish which I believe this team can do much better.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

blue90

January 30th, 2016 at 11:27 AM ^

7-2 would be great if they win today (knock on wood) and finishing at 10-8 would be a let down.  I think they can get to 12-6, but regardless, 11-7 certainly gets them in, 10-8 probably does too.  I think this team still has an upet or two in them, especially when Caris comes back and we play some of these better teams at home.  I see 2-3 against the ranked opponents we have left and a good likeliness 3-2.  IU, MSU, Purdoo, Iowa, Maryland, Maryland being the only game away.  It think IU is overrated and the other teams are damn good but we can one or two more besides IU because they're at home and we will have Caris back.  They win today but I think it will be close 77-69.

scottiek65

January 30th, 2016 at 12:39 PM ^

I love how it is like we tricked the B1G and PSU. we turned a road game at PSU to a home game at MSG.  Thats a home game. We own NYC!  i feel like we have 10 home games and 8 road games now.