Preview: Penn State 2014 Comment Count

Brian

275px-Big10-Uniform-PSU[1]Essentials

WHAT Michigan vs Penn State
WHERE Michigan Stadium,
Ann Arbor MI
WHEN 7 Eastern
October 11th, 2014
THE LINE Michigan -1
TELEVISION ESPN2
TICKETS Starting at 32 bucks
WEATHER clear, 0% chance of rain
50 dropping to 40 by 10
negligible wind

Overview

Penn State is probably not real good. They've got offensive line issues up the wazoo, they beat a middling-at-best Rutgers 13-10, they escaped UCF with a last-second field goal. I guess I'm sayin' there's a chance. Vegas is saying there's a downright fair chance. When it's all tied it up it's anyone's game as long as they're there to make plays, right?

Injury Guesses

PROBABLY IN: Taylor, Funchess, Wilson, as all played last week.

MAYBE: Shane Morris, who Michigan dressed last week in a classic "nuh-uh" move.

Erik Magnuson is reaching the timeframe where he may be available after his rumored high ankle sprain, but it's more likely he waits until after the bye week.

PROBABLY OUT: Delano Hill, Derrick Green, Jabrill Peppers, Desmond Morgan.

Run Offense vs Penn State

Michigan showed signs of life against Rutgers, going for 5.5 yards a carry without anything particularly long. Tiny flags were waved across the ramparts of Ann Arbor

Now Penn State wheels the big guns in. Michigan is staring down the barrel of this:

Opponent Att Yards Avg. TD
UCF 27 41 1.5 2
Akron 21 83 4.0 0
Rutgers 34 121 3.6 1
Massachusetts 25 28 1.1 0
Northwestern 37 116 3.1 3
sack adjusted

None of these teams are good at running the ball—Akron is in fact highest in YPC at 58th. And Michigan is shockingly proficient in statland, 32nd in YPC thanks to steamrolling Appalachian State and Miami (Not That Miami). But at this early juncture a big chunk of PSU opponents' ranking comes from facing PSU, and the Nittany Lions lead the country in YPC allowed at 1.99. They can say YOU DON'T WANT THIS and the right answer is probably "yessir."

A quick sanity check of their personnel reveals that they should be pretty good. Ace:

The defensive ends also played quite well. RU's right tackle couldn't handle the size/speed combo of SDE Deion Barnes, who looks very capable of producing a similar mismatch against Ben Braden. WDE CJ Olaniyan is also quick around the edge, though he did get blown off the ball a few times against the run; that didn't burn PSU much in this game because of Zettel.

Hull is the standout in the middle of the defense, and while neither of the outside linebackers are at his level, they cover a lot of ground sideline-to-sideline against both the run and the pass. Wartman missed last weekend's Northwestern game with an arm injury but is expected to be back on Saturday—he practiced in full pads on Wednesday.

These guys are all experienced upperclassmen even after the offensive line was forced to raid the DL for both starting guards this offseason. There's not a whole lot of depth, as this is the year Penn State's sanctions bite most deeply, but they've been plenty good enough to boot opposing offenses off the field quickly enough to stay fresh.

These guys are legit, and that should be alarming to a Michigan unit that overpowered a small Rutgers front last week but threatens to be overpowered themselves this weekend.

Key Matchup: Tackles versus ends. Michigan's weak point meets Deion Barnes and CJ Olaniyan, and since it only takes one messed up block to blow up a play…

[Hit THE JUMP for a GIANT MACAQUE terrorizing THE STREETS OF BANGKOK this is NOT A REFERENCE to ANY PLAYER it's just WEIRD]

Pass Offense vs Penn State

Penn State Syracuse Football

Alex, I'll take "Symptoms of Michigan Dysfunction, 2007-2014" for $600.

Devin Gardner returned to the starting lineup last week and had an excellent game aside from his usual crippling interception; this was obscured by some drops and a general lack of opportunity caused by Michigan penalties and other errors restricting him to 22 attempts. He is what he is: we have a "Devin Gardner explodes in all directions" tag. But he can move the ball.

Penn State has been good in this department as well; opponents are completing just 53% of their passes and they've only given up 2 TDs to 6 INT, 5 of which of course came from the guy who just shredded Michigan's secondary. The YPA allowed, on the other hand, is only meh at 6.8 given the opponents they've faced. PSU does have a healthy number of sacks with 13.

Worse for Michigan is that PSU gets a lot of its production by just rushing four guys. Zettel, Barnes, and Olaniyan have combined for seven sacks in five games, and 10 of those sacks come from DL. They have a right to rush four and guys who can win one on one battles with Michigan's tackles. Zettel also promises to be a handful for the interior:

The defensive line works very well as a unit. Austin Johnson holds his ground at the nose, allowing Anthony Zettel to do what he does best: slash into the backfield with regularity.

The defensive line works very well as a unit. Austin Johnson holds his ground at the nose, allowing Anthony Zettel to do what he does best: slash into the backfield with regularity.

Zettel would later record a sack with the same quick spin move; he also drew a couple holding calls and generally lived in the Rutgers backfield. He's got great burst off the snap, uses his hands well, and possesses an array of moves to free himself from blockers. Yes, it would've been nice to get this guy three years ago.

In the secondary, Adrian Amos and Jordan Lucas are the headliners. Amos, a CB/S hybrid, is capable at either spot; Lucas is a physical tackler and capable cover guy. Again, the secondary is thin but the top guys are mostly capable. PSU does have a slight tendency to give up chunk play; if Michigan can find time to test the intermediate sections of the field Funchess could rack up a number of those 15-25 yard catches.

Key matchup: Gardner versus the Turnover Gremlin. Bad gremlin! Stop.

Run Defense vs Penn State

1013_SPT_JP-PSU-28_53813611[1]

up close and personal

Take the Penn State rush defense and Michigan rush offense and invert them. Now ratchet your confidence meter up further. This is what Penn State has done on the ground so far this year:

Opponent Att Yards Avg. TD
UCF 28 57 2.04 1
Akron 31 106 3.42 0
Rutgers 33 64 1.94 1
Massachusetts 45 228 5.07 5
Northwestern 25 50 2 0

Due to limitations in available data these are not sack adjusted, but you can subtract 14 carries and add 72 yards to that and it is still approaching Michigan-2013-level abominable. In two Big Ten games, Penn State is averaging fewer yards than their national-best defense cedes.

This is due in large part to their massive offensive line issues. They could be spotted a mile away as Penn State is deploying a position-switch starter at guard after flipping DTs Brian Gaia and Derek Dowrey to OL; those guys now rotate. With Miles Diffenbach out with injury and touted left tackle Donovan Smith showing some cracks against the Wildcats, it is open season on TFLs.

It doesn't help that the Penn State tailbacks are pedestrian. Zach Zwinak has always been a back who gets tackled by the first guy after falling forward for a couple extra yards; Bill Belton is considerably more explosive but won't be mistaken for Melvin Gordon any time soon.

Meanwhile, Michigan's run defense returned to its previous rather good state against Rutgers one week after Minnesota gashed them alarmingly. If their performance against rushing offenses approximately on Penn State's level is not another mirage of competence that evaporates as soon as anyone puts their faith in it, they should put up numbers approximately as dominating as UCF/Rutgers/Northwestern did.

There is that whole mirage thing, yes; I still have to assume that the data we have has some bearing on the future, otherwise these previews devolve into small children giving you the bird and screaming CAUSATION DOES NOT EXIST YOUR MOLECULES COULD FLEE FROM EACH OTHER AT ANY MOMENT.

If Penn State does rush for big chunks against Michigan you can find me in a heap under the bed trying to hold my molecules together, is what I'm saying.

Key Matchup: Michigan DTs versus penetration, and over-penetration. We want them to get into the backfield, and they probably will. We do not want them going so hard and so far that Penn State can design those cutback runs and get big chunks. 

Pass Defense vs Penn State

Christian Hackenberg Penn State v Central Z5hH_btkyi_l[1]

RUN! JUST RUN AWAY FROM EVERYTHING! LEAVE THE STADIUM! Y'ALL TOO DUMB TO LISTEN TO ME, THE GUY YELLING AT YOU IN A THEATER!

This blog's extensive offseason posting of a mocking highlight video featuring Gary Nova set to Miley Cyrus's "Wrecking Ball" set up a sizeable karmic debt that came due last Saturday. Nova went nova in our delicate parts to the tune of 400 passing yards. When the mushroom cloud cleared gone was all hope that Michigan's defense could hold the fort long enough for its offense to do much of anything. We formally apologize for this, but would like you to know that we are not accountable for it and it is all the medical staff's fault.

Fortunately, opposing this rag-tag band of survivors is another equally desperate unit. Anyone who's seen a Penn State game this year knows what it is to be the guy at a horror movie who screams "RUN!" at the characters, because every door is a turnstile and behind it are orcs for Christian Hackenberg.

Hackenberg has coped admirably with this fact; he's still been sacked 14 times. If we assume every Hacknberg carry is an accident of protection—off by one or two carries if it's off at all—that number shoots up to 35. That is an absolute butt-ton of disrupted plays halfway into a season and that doesn't account for the myriad throwaways, passes harassed into inaccuracy, and the like. A reasonably protected Hackenberg isn't completing 58% of his passes with a 4-6 TD-INT ratio. But he's not reasonably protected.

Penn State is also a mite deficient at wide receiver. DaeSean Hamilton leads with 36 catches for 502 yards so far, numbers that are indubitably respectable; Geno Lewis is just behind him, and then Chris Godwin has nine catches. That's two freshmen and a sophomore; the next guy in is also a freshman. There have been several incidents this season where they haven't been on the same page. Unfortunately, they seem to run a lot of the stuff that Michigan has been bad at defending:

Geno Lewis is Penn State's big play threat, capable of finding gaps between zones deep downfield...

...or grabbing a slant and getting a big chunk after the catch. PSU threw a lot of slants in this one with middling success aside from the play linked in the previous sentence, but with how often Michigan has allowed free inside releases this season, Hackenberg could find more success with them this weekend.

And if they can get that they can neutralize a lot of the OL problems with three step drops.

Penn State make up for the experience deficit at WR with a pile of tight ends; man-mountain Jesse James is the most prominent. He's what Michigan hopes Ian Bunting becomes in a couple years: a 6'7" mid-range target who is tough to defend without ladders.

Meanwhile, Michigan… sigh. A combination of no pressure from the DL and lots of open wide receivers caused that Nova in our parts. Blake Countess was repeatedly victimized and is beginning to feel like a cornerback version of Devin Gardner: broken, hazily looking out over a burning city wondering where it all went wrong. The safeties didn't show up in the right place often enough. Jake Ryan seemed out of position a lot. These things don't seem likely to get fixed; neither does it seem likely that they will all be a bad against Penn State.

Michigan should have enough third and long opportunities to boot PSU off the field, but they'll biff a frustrating number.

Key Matchup: Michigan coverages versus Hackenberg's reads. We've seen quarterbacks confidently fire in rhythm most of this year, preventing Michigan from getting to the QB or intercepting anything. If Michigan can just force Hackenberg to go to a second guy, a lot of the time that is going to end poorly for Penn State.

Special Teams

Penn State kicker Sam Ficken has developed into a reliable option after a rocky start to his career; he hit the game-winner against UCF and is 10/12 on the year. Both misses came from within 40, and he's got a long of just 42, so he's not a killer like Utah's dude; don't get your hopes up he misses much.

Freshman punter Chris Gulla has been bad, and worse recently: he's averaging 38 yards a kick and only managed to scratch out 35 on six punts against Northwestern. Penn State seems to be on the verge of a change, as Aussie Daniel Pasquariello has gotten three opportunities the last couple weeks.

Despite the short punting, PSU's given up five returns for 60 yards, so there could be some opportunity. This is a weakness.

Penn State hasn't done much with returns this year and doesn't appear to have a standout option. The punt return guy is Jesse Della Valle, who's very much in the "catch it and run it back a few yards to be safe" mold.

Michigan's special teams are an ongoing wreck, neither capable of covering or returning anything and in possession of a shaky-ish kicker.

Key Matchup: YOU PUT ELEVEN GUYS ON THE FIELD AT LEAST MOST OF THE TIME

Intangibles

4020970527_c4f1f6f2e3_m[1]

results for "Paterno Cat" are disappointing
has no one put cokebottle glasses on their cat
I mean this is just obvious, people

Cheap Thrills

Worry if...

  • You find yourself consumed with uncertainty about whether you want Michigan to win for the short term health of the program or not win for the long term health of the program.
  • Zettel and Olaniyan rampaging through Michigan's offensive line threatens to make you so sad you lose consciousness.
  • Basketball season is delayed.

Cackle with knowing glee if..

  • Beyonce shows up at halftime again on a video board
  • They play Pour Some Sugar On Me
  • The game ball is delivered by the world's largest rat

Fear/Paranoia Level: 6 (Baseline 5; -1 for LOL Their OL, +1 for OLE Their DL, –1 for Ha They Almost Lost To Rutgers, +1 for We Did Lose To Rutgers, +1 for And Gary Nova Went Boom, –1 for We're Favorites!, +1 for I Assume Sharps Are Making Massive Bank Betting Against Michigan Every Week (Yes Except Last Week When Michigan Covered By A Blocked XP, Mr Gambling Pedant))

Desperate need to win level: 5 (Baseline 5; +1 for Good Feelings Are Good, –1 for Season Goals Are What Now, +1 for Night Game Win Streak To Preserve, –1 for Losing Does Bring Us Additional Clarity On The Off Chance That The Message Board Weirdos Are Not Brandon-Hired Astroturfers But People With Legitimate Information To The Effect That This Is Not Definitely Over, –1 for Meh, +1 for I Like The We Own Penn State Cheer And Wish For It To Be Even A Little Accurate Again)

Loss will cause me to... ride the world's largest rat into the distance, fading away as I exit camera range. 

Win will cause me to... feel happy for the players until the next time it's made clear the program regards fans as nothing more than wallets who should shut up.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

You know those games from the 50s when punting on second down seemed kind of reasonable but nobody was brave enough to do so? That.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:

  • Sludgefart espectaculo, with total rushing yards under 150 between both teams.
  • PSU's DL outperforms Michigan's and this is the difference in the game.
  • Penn State, 17-14

Comments

NuclearLion

October 10th, 2014 at 4:40 PM ^

Hey guys, I've been checking out a lot of your coverage of the game this week over here, and I'm really impressed. It's really in-depth and fun to read. So thanks!

I'd say that many PSUers are as pessimistic about this game as you guys are though lol. Personally, I think UM wins somewhere around 25-13 give or take.

My question is thus: it's clear from the coverage on MGoBlog this week and in a lot of the comment section that it seems the UM fanbase has pretty much given up on Brandon/Hoke. I'm curious what your impressions are with respect to whether or not these feelings are shared by the players, too. Do you think the players given up on their overlords the way the fans have? 

I haven't gotten a chance to watch too much UM this fall for various reasons, but I did catch most of the RU game, and I didn't see a team that's given up whatsoever. I think there's a real good chance they put it together against the Nittany Lions this week, with it being a prime-time game and really needing a win to keep bowl eligibility in play.

In any event, hopefully it will be a clean, well-officiated game tomorrow night, and not a complete tire fire.

UMForLife

October 10th, 2014 at 4:52 PM ^

I don't think the players have given up. They will play hard, regardless. There is still a little of pride left in them, for what it is worth.

I am not sure if the bowl eligibility will be the motivation. If you haven't heard, I will bet you my M pride that our practice team will beat your practice team by 23 points.

Alas, I am not as confident as you are about our victory, when we play in the real game.

Hoping for a good game as well. With all the negativity sorrounding both programs, it will be good to have a great game on national TV. Hopefully, it restores some prestige.

Go Blue!

Bodogblog

October 10th, 2014 at 4:53 PM ^

They certainly have not given up.  They fought back really well against Rutgers last week, and should have had a chance to play on from about the 38 yard line with ~3 minutes to go and a fresh set of downs.  Doesn't mean they would have or should have won (Rutgers deserved it), but they made the 3rd and 9 play and would have had a better shot than a 58-yard field goal. 

But these things always have a limit.  If they start to get beaten, and they're clearly in bad positions and PSU starts getting easy yards and TD's, and on the other side we're runnig into stacked fronts and getting stuffed, they'll start to teeter.  At some point they'll break if the coaching keeps putting them in bad positions, they keep playing poorly as players, and they keep losing. 

petered0518

October 10th, 2014 at 4:57 PM ^

I don't think they have given up on Hoke, but I also don't think that is grounds for keeping him. Winning is part of the coaches job in addition to developing his players.

 

Almost every functional sports team develops a family mentality, especially when a guy like Hoke intentionally fosters it in his players. That is one of the really cool things about being part of a team and I think it is great that the players defend each other and their coach. But that mentality also makes it so that their opinion on the competence of Hoke is heavily biased and shouldn't be a factor in evaluating a coach. 

 

Anyone objectively analyzing Hoke's coaching acumen during his tenure at Michigan has to be coming to the conclusion that he is in over his head. There is no other explanation for our inexorable decline over the last three years.

The FannMan

October 10th, 2014 at 5:01 PM ^

Well, welcome to MGoBlog.  We are generally reasonable folk around here.  However, we are not in a good place at the moment.

My own uninformed view is that the players have not given up, nor are they likely to.  If Brady Hoke told them to run through a wall, they would try to do it.  In fact, that is basically what our running game has been like for the last year and a half.

To answer a question that you didn't really ask but maybe were getting at - I don't think Hoke has lost the team.  By all accounts, he is a very nice guy who generally cares for the kids.  I think the only college coaches who lose teams are complete a-holes.  See Lane Kiffin at USC.  Hoke is not Lane Kiffin, and is not likely to have the team turn on him.  Hoke's problem is that he is simply in far over his head.

M-Lemon

October 10th, 2014 at 5:06 PM ^

Thanks for the refreshing perspective--we're not the only pessimistic fans!  As for your question, I think the players like and respect Hoke and want to see him succeed.  They have not given up and have the potential to make any game interesting (see last year's OSU game).  That does not mean they will win, but I think we may see a good game tomorrow night.  GO BLUE! 

The FannMan

October 10th, 2014 at 4:49 PM ^

Penn State 30 - Michigan 13

Hack + slants x our inability to cover = 30 points for PSU who won't need to run the ball but will try anyway because BigTen!

Run competency mirrage is a mirrage - PSU DL competency not-mirrage + 3 INTs for Gardner = 2 FGs and one good looking drive out no where for us.

Caveat - Unless we put 10 guys our on punt coverage again, in which case 37 to 13.

Bonus Prediction - a good chunk of the student section shows up late, and then leaves because the game is out of reach by half.  People blame it all on a "protest" rather than the fact that Brandon has so alienated the future of the fanbase that they would rather sit around and do nothing than come to a Michigan football game.  This warps into a need to protect poor Dave from those nasty protesters who don't support the players. 

 

UofM Die Hard …

October 10th, 2014 at 5:00 PM ^

Win will cause me too..."feel happy for the players until the next time it's made clear the program regards fans as nothing more than wallets who should shut up."

 

 

Makes me sad

 

 

ChicagoGangViolins

October 10th, 2014 at 5:17 PM ^

 
It'll be the arm tackling for us.  Hackenberg shows us some quarterbacking. PSU 31 M 10. Shite! again methinks.
 

alum96

October 10th, 2014 at 5:32 PM ^

I have a lot of points PSU, less points UM in this one.

Stop me if you have heard this one before

  • Run offense generally stifled
  • A few run plays that say "hey there is hope for 2017 OL"
  • Holding calls
  • Lots of 2nd and long and 3rd and long
  • Funchess makes a few catches early
  • Funchess is erased in 2nd half
  • Darboh and Chesson spend an afternoon with PSU DBs counting hairs on their necks
  • Butt makes an appearance in the stadium..then is dutifully ignored for 98% of the actual game
  • AJ Williams gets extensive playing time
  • Devin makes 2-3 runs where you go "why doesnt he do that 10-12x a game"
  • PSU blitzes Devin into oblivion on every 3rd down
  • Devin throws to PSU a few times in reaction as opposing players are his definition of "2nd read"
  • PSU catches it at least once

On the other side of the ball

  • DL does some run stopping
  • LBs look lost against TEs/RBs
  • Safeties do not appear in the TV screen on deep passes
  • Countess gets burned
  • Frank Clark "just misses" multiple times
  • Henry envelops a few PSU runners
  • Hackenberg has the longest scramble of his life
  • Hackenberg begins 2015 Heisman campaign
  • The game is pretty close deep into the 2nd quarter. PSU gets the ball with 90-120 seconds left in the half and 80+ yards to go.  We all talk about getting them in a 3 and out...they proceed to drive the entire length of field and score.
  • We come out in the 3rd flat, and PSU scores readily
  • Mattison says after the game he should have made adjustments during the game

See also Northwestern, Maryland, and Indiana games.

At least script will flip some vs MSU and OSU... most of the good things above won't exist.

snarling wolverine

October 10th, 2014 at 6:01 PM ^

It seems like we're always overrating our defense going into any game against a team with a pulse.  It's not very good.  I expect PSU to score 24-30 points.  Our O will have to step it up.

 

UMForLife

October 10th, 2014 at 6:19 PM ^

It will always be something that doesn't work. Something that worked well, will not work this week. So, I am expecting PSU passing yards to be restricted and the rushing yards will demoralize us this week. That is just the way it goes. It is as if the coaches focus on the issue from last week and the players have a short term memory loss and forget what they learned the previous week.

uminks

October 10th, 2014 at 6:54 PM ^

Q1:    UM 7 -  PSU  14

Q2:     UM 3 -  PSU 3    Half time UM 10 - PSU 17. 

Q3:     UM  3 - PSU 10 

Q4:     UM 0 -  PSU 7

PSU 34  -  Michigan 13. 

mcmillan56

October 10th, 2014 at 7:21 PM ^

If michgans O-line comes to play this week which I believe is improving every week and Gardner can play like he did last week michigan should pull off the win I'm just worried about our secondary going against Christian Hackenburg

mcmillan56

October 10th, 2014 at 7:22 PM ^

If michgans O-line comes to play this week which I believe is improving every week and Gardner can play like he did last week michigan should pull off the win I'm just worried about our secondary going against Christian Hackenburg

Bando Calrissian

October 10th, 2014 at 8:09 PM ^

Brian, we may not be seeing Beyonce, but we will probably see something called "PixMob."

In just 24 hours, the MMB will be Taking the Field with PixMob. Our students and staff have been working tirelessly with the PixMob team to put together this very special halftime show, and we can't wait for you to see the final result. We don't want to give away too many details, but for an idea of some of the special effects that might be incorporated in the show, be sure to head to http://pixmob.com/. We'll see you tomorrow Under the Lights!

"Connect Crowds, Reinvent Rituals." I can't even. 

A2D2

October 10th, 2014 at 8:11 PM ^

  • Long line of former players welcomes team out.  Team acts fired up.  In Bradyland, dad now has 565 sons. 
  • The game begins with a big play and a UM score.  The crowd goes wild!
  • PSU gets snuffed - three and out.  The crowd goes wilder!
  • UM goes 27 yards in 14 plays and settles for a field goal that didn't blocked, fer goodness sakes.  The crowd cheers!
  • PSU responds with a field goal.  The crowd responds with applause. 
  • Then UM drives, but Gardner throws an unexpected interception - wow, that's different.  PSU returns it to the UM 20 and on the next play Hackenstorm-trooper throws one over Countess's head - wow that's unexpected - for a TD.
  • UM punts, PSU gets a field goal.  13-10 at the half.

 

polite applause as the team leave the fiel

  • Second half is "pure Michigan".  Gardner unexpectedly throws two more ints, Smith loses a fumble, and somebody else loses one just for good measure.  Wow, that's just plain unexpected.......
  • Side note:  attendance is announced as 101,010 which explains the 30,000 empty seats, which stands to reason, since we find out later that the stadium actually seats 147,901 "we had a little math problem that has now been corrected" (per Dave Brandon's interview on the Michigan Insider Monday).
  • Gardner finishes 13-31, 167 yards and 3 ints.  Smith carries 16 times for 50 yards (a vast improvement over last year Brandy will say next week on the coach's show).  Garner is sacked 5 times, wow,that's unexpected.......
  • Christian "stormtrooper" Hackenburg goes 27-34 for 376 yards and 3 TDs.  He is named Big 10 offensive player of the week (Brandy's comment on the coach's show is "by anybody's numbers that's a 10% improvement over last week, Brady").
  • UM is named the (just plain) offensive team team team of the week.

 

  • final score:  PSU 34, UM 10

In the words of Adrian Monk, "I could be wrong, but I don't think so"

 

 

You Only Live Twice

October 10th, 2014 at 9:10 PM ^

Enjoy those times A2D2... they don't last long and it's fun to be able to make up your own age-appropriate explanations. My 11 yo is almost 12 now and in the space of the year I have gone from being the all wise all knowing mom to evidently being mentally infirm.

Just for the laugh I got from your comment... and because Brian always gives us some hope of being able to cackle with knowing glee... Michigan 27 PSU 10

In reply to by You Only Live Twice

A2D2

October 11th, 2014 at 12:26 PM ^

I do have plenty of room in Section 36 that I didn't have just a couple of years ago.  Nope, no more cramped quarters for us.....we can spread out and get stuff at the concession stand quickly, and go to the bathroom at halftime and not miss the band, and get to our car really fast after the game.  Yep, it's all good!

On the other hand, a few successful trips to the red zone would be nice....................

 

Sugaloaf

October 10th, 2014 at 9:21 PM ^

New Banner Quote:
Sludgefart Espectaculo

And the banner can be a photo of trampled mud after everyone flees for the exits in the third quarter. The Michigan Difference.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Leonhall

October 10th, 2014 at 10:27 PM ^

As others have said, close first half, we could be up like 14-6 or 14-10. PSU makes adjustments, we don't, Hoke claps, Gardner probably gets hurt knowing out luck. We lose 34-17. Brandon is fired Monday morning.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

LightTheLamp

October 11th, 2014 at 12:52 AM ^

wait, so they have offensive line issues and they beat the mighty Rutgers?! They are coming off a wife weekend, but our crazy reality show of a program has had an off week so I guess it will be close. They have a better QB, other than that we are similar teams, so on a betting standpoint give me PSU and the points.

Tater

October 11th, 2014 at 3:52 AM ^

Sadly, PSU is good enough to beat Michigan.  In a way, though, it's a no-lose situation.  If the Wolverines beat PSU, we finally get to scream and yell in happiness.  If they lose, we may get to see David Brandon gone at the beginning of the week.  

 

 

DarthStarks

October 11th, 2014 at 11:24 AM ^

to take advantage of his athletic ability, if the plan is not to use him in the running game, is to have him take deeper drops when setting up to pass.  We've already established he's missing recievers by ten yardsl how having him take 7-8 steps, giving him a little more time to see the field, and in the event PSU's D-line bust through, he has the space to use his feet to get away.  But I'm not a coach here.