We will win this game simply because our team is better. They have a freshman QB and lost a bunch of athletes from sanctions.
Preview: Penn State 2013
State College, PA
|WHEN||5 PM Eastern
October 12th, 2013
|THE LINE||M –2.5|
|WEATHER||partly cloudy, mid 60s dropping to 50s, 10% chance of rain|
I ADMIT IT, AND I'D DO IT AGAIN, SEE? YEAH, SEE?
Penn State enters their game against Michigan reeling after their first-ever loss to Indiana, that by a whopping 20 points. While Penn State's attempts to get back into the game created a bit of a point avalanche for the Hoosiers, Indiana racked up almost 500 yards in a decidedly non-fluky victory.
With a 37-34 loss to UCF that wasn't really that close also in the rear view mirror, Penn State is teetering on the brink of a sanctions-imposed abyss. A win against Michigan forestalls that for a while yet. A home loss to go 3-3 with two gimmies and spirits will deflate.
Run Offense vs Penn State
Glenn Carson tackles will hit double digits
Penn State's rushing defense has been schizophrenic. They've obliterated Eastern Michigan and Kent State. Those teams are really terrible at offense, sure. Syracuse is actually decent-ish and Penn State held them under a hundred yards; their main backs combined to acquire 3.5 yards an attempt on 28 carries.
In their other two games they've been shredded.
- UCF got two runs of 40+ yards and averaged 6.7 yards an attempt, quarterbacks excluded.
- Indiana was a bit less prolific but also ripped off a 40-yarder and averaged 5.2 a pop, team and QB rushes excluded.
Ace hopped on Google Talk to describe with wonder IU's backbreaking 75-yard touchdown drive to go up 28-17, because it was all rushes and screens. Vintage Penn State defense this isn't.
Sanctions have started to bite heavily, especially in the linebacker corps, where Nyeem Wartman and Ben Kline have been knocked out of the lineup and Mike Hull has been playing hurt, visibly. He missed EMU and Kent State and has limped through the last couple games. That leaves senior returning starter Glenn Carson, a fringe NFL prospect, as the only fully healthy starter. Hull's making do at one spot and 5'10" converted safety Stephen Obeng-Agyapong is operating as a permanent nickelback at the other. Against Indiana, PSU used Carson and Hull as the ILBs; against Michigan they'll have to hope all three guys can read and react in the box, because if you think Michigan sees 5'10" linebacker and 250 pound SDE and isn't going to manball faces you've got another thing coming.
Given Michigan's success at reducing turnovers with a grinding style, expect them to continue that until Penn State proves they can stop it—and I mean stop it, not just reduce it to 3 or 4 yards. This is actually a situation in which you may be able to "wear down the opponent," because the opponent is operating with 61 scholarship players. Penn State has a tough task against tackle over: shift under and Lewan's blowing your DE off the ball. Shift over and you're asking a lot of Obeng-Agyapong.
The cat-and-mouse game will play a large role in success here, as Michigan's overload is susceptible to a similar overload from Penn State and counters were limited and not particularly effective against Minnesota. They had a couple of weakside isos and one honest-to-God counter; only one of those plays was particularly successful.
With Fitzgerald Toussaint obviously instructed to get upfield fast and hard on threat of pudding bath, Michigan will grind out another low-TFL, low-YPA, lots of third-and-short running performance, leaving big plays to relatively infrequent passes.
Key Matchup: Kerridge, Butt, and Kalis/Bryant against Penn State linebackers. Yeah, I'm taking it for granted that the Red Sea will part on these power plays, whether it's by playing straight up for Lewan adjusting to slant games PSU comes up with. That'll leave the lead block convoy against PSU's hallowed but flagging LB corps.
[Hit THE JUMP for Come to Penn Shhhhhhtate!]
Pass Offense vs Penn State
Like the rush defense, PSU throttled Syracuse, EMU, and Kent State and was crushed themselves against UCF and Indiana. Passing lines in those two games:
- Blake Bortles, UCF: 20/27, 288 yards, 10.7 YPA, 3 TD, 1 INT
- Nate Sudfeld, Indiana: 23/38, 321 yards, 8.4 YPA, 2 TD, 1 INT
If you're thinking that defending probably didn't go too well in those games if Penn State couldn't defend either the run or the pass in them, well, yeah. Here is the Bortlesing:
Hitches hitches hitches, and then getting beat over the top. Penn State's in damage control mode at corner.
Short on players, Penn State moved corner Adrian Amos to safety before the season and generally makes due with Obeng-Agyapong as their nickel in passing sets. The corners are both sophomores who committed in the immediate aftermath of Penn State's sanctions and had one other BCS offer each, and that's only if you count Temple. Lucas was thought to be a safety by the sites, Williams a wideout. Williams is a position switch starter that signals desperation, as he was still a wideout until PSU's spring practice.
They've got size, but if they're not playing off Jeremy Gallon he will eat them alive, and this seems like a defensive backfield that is going to have trouble sticking with Funchess just like Minnesota did.
Penn State's pass rush has collected 11 sacks on the year, with no more than two from any one person. Ace said they didn't blitz much against Indiana but they've got to be bringing guys at least sometimes since DBs and LBs have 4 of their sacks.
The question for Michigan is: are they the kind of offense that disassembles these guys or vice-versa? If you're going by career Gardner YPA, the answer is hell yes. If you're going by your eyes, the answer is closing your eyes and praying. Against Minnesota, Michigan mitigated the eyes thing by working Gardner into the game slowly and putting him in a lot of situations where they were able to get him time and his receivers space because Minnesota was overplaying the run.
They're not going to be able to get away with quite as much crunch in this one—Michgian's going to have to throw more than 17 times. That'll up the pressure on Gardner and AJ Williams and expose Michigan to more danger. The potential rewards from Michigan's newly sexy WR corps demand exploration of the possibilities, though.
Key matchup: Gardner versus himself, still.
BONUS key matchup: AJ Williams versus PSU DEs in pass protection. Feels like Michigan's going to have some opportunities to hit big plays over the top as long as they can keep Gardner clean on tackle over play action.
Run Defense vs Penn State
Hyyyyarrr! Prepare for the GINGERBEARDENING
Starting tailback Zach Zwinak is a Weisman-like moose good at pounding his way forward and not much of a breakaway threat. He was highly effective against UCF but only moderately so against the rest of the schedule. Like Michigan's ground game against Minnesota, he's likely to get you a small number of yards play in, play out.
Backup Bill Belton is a smaller, quicker guy with a better YPC and more sparing usage. He'll probably see around ten carries; sophomore Akeel Lynch got plenty of effective run late in the Kent State and EMU blowouts but has seen little time in competitive games.
This is a Notre Dame-like offense that spreads the field and hands off too infrequently for fans' taste, which could pose Michigan some problems. They've responded to passing spreads with a lot of nickel packages that lift their nose tackle in favor of another pass-rush threat. It says here that practice should stop immediately since the extra pass-rush threat has not actually threatened any pass rush and it's time for senior Quinton Washington to get the playing time he deserves. He was Michigan's best lineman against Minnesota, easily, and if his presence can cut down on third and shorts he should be in there.
Even if he is, the rest of Michigan's line is young or undersized or liable to miss assignments and Zwinak should have a relatively productive day as Michigan's excellent inside linebackers have to work through too much trash to keep him to two yards very often.
Key Matchup: Quinton Washington and Three Tech Du Jour against double teams. Michigan is going to flee the box and
Pass Defense vs Penn State
This will be a stern test for Michigan's passing defense. Despite having a true freshman slinging the ball around, Penn State has shown no compunction against having Christian Hackenberg fling it plenty. He's had one game under 30 attempts, that 28 against UCF, and is coming off an arm-wearying 55 against the Hoosiers.
After a torrid start with 70% completions over his first three games, he's come back to earth with a 13 of 35 performance against Kent State(!) and a mediocre 6.2 YPA in that pass-happy Indiana game. He's been interception prone, as you might expect: four on the year and it probably should be more after he was fortunate to get away with some throws against the Hoosiers. Ace:
…when the game was close, he was very erratic, alternating gorgeous darts to the opposite hash with late throws to the perimeter that should've been intercepted (I have four of those in my notes) and several passes either behind or over his receivers. …this is a talented true freshman who plays like a talented true freshman. Some of his passes actually elicited a "wow" from me while watching; others produced a "whoa"—as in "whoa, how did that not get picked off?"
Par for the course there, and Hackenberg hasn't faced a defense that would strike anyone as even average unless you want to count UCF. Do you want to do that? I'm guessing probably not.
Hackenberg's primary target is of course Allen Robinson, who's probably the best receiver in the Big Ten and one of the best in the country. With Penn State basing out of three-wide formations with a standup tight end, Michigan's desire to stick Blake Countess in the slot and ride or die with Taylor and Avery on the outside in the nickel package will be put to the test. I expect they'll stick with it. Also something they'll stick with: all two deep safeties playing conservative, all (most) of the time.
Penn State's prolific tight end corps has also been damaged by injury. Matt Lehman went out for the year in the Syracuse game and Kyle Carter "nearly broke an arm" in the same game; he's been limited. Spectacularly-named Jesse James has found more playing time, but he's in the Funchess mold: all catch, no block.
Michigan has played mostly soft zone coverages this year, giving teams seven-yard hitches and bleeding yardage as they prevent big plays. This would be a great strategy if they could just get to the quarterback by themselves. They can't. Hackenberg is a statute, so their tendency to vacate rush lanes may be a little less painful than it was against Minnesota… or more so if a guy breaks open deep.
Jake Ryan may return in this one; if he does the assumption here is that he becomes a nickel DE opposite Brennen Beyer, and is about as good as Frank Clark is because even bionic men take some time to get back into the swing of things.
Key Matchup: Robinson versus Avery/Taylor. Michigan's D is predicated on not giving up big plays. Robinson is going to get his, but as long as they're 15 yard chunks and not 60 yarders Michigan will have time to get Hackenberg in mistake mode.
After a confidence-shattering start to his career, PSU kicker Sam Ficken has recovered to become a reliable option. He's 8/10 on the year with both misses outside of 40 and he's hit 3/5 from that distance, including a 54-yarder against Kent State. This has unfortunately not caused Bill O'Brien to revert to a more old-timey fourth down approach.
Punter Allen Butterworth is not so fortunate. After averaging 37 yards a pop last year he's nosed that up to 40 this year. This is still short enough that only a third of his attempts are getting returned, those for an average of six yards each.
Penn State got big punt returns in their first two games from Jesse Della Valle, and you know the thing about Michigan's punt coverage. That's going to be a nervous few moments; call the punting even.
Key Matchup: YOU DO NOT LET THE BALL TOUCH YOU UNLESS YOU ARE THE DESIGNATED PUNT RETURNER AND THEN YOU CATCH THE BALL, NOT DROPPING IT, AND SO FORTH AND SO ON.
- Devin Gardner's first pass, which comes in the third quarter, bores through the chest of Hull and pops out into the waiting arms of another Penn State defender, whereupon he returns the ball 30 yards until Gardner ninja-kicks him, reclaims the ball, runs 90 yards the other way balancing the ball on his head like it's Calcutta laundry, and runs all the way out of the endzone for a Penn State touchback.
- Michigan again has trouble defending runs out of spread nickel stuff.
- The manball isn't working.
Cackle with knowing glee if...
- Hackenberg is the magic turnover guy in this game.
- Redzone items become decisive what with Michigan's ability to manball up and Penn State's general lack of blocking guys.
- Devin Funchess is going King Kong on PSU's secondary.
Fear/Paranoia Level: 5 (Baseline 5; +1 for Road Spells Trouble, +1 for Vegas Line Is Unaccountably Tight For A Team That Just Got Blitzed By Indiana, –1 for They Did Just Get Blitzed By Indiana, –1 for Funchess Versus Converted WR, –1 for Manball Seems Like A Good Idea, +1 for BOB Is Just As Good At Decisions As Hoke)
Desperate need to win level: 7 (Baseline 5; +1 for WE'RE GONNA WIN THIS HORRIBLE CONFERENCE, –1 for We're Probably Not Going To Do That, +1 for BUT WE MIGHT, +1 for Must Add To Spectacular Blues Brothers PSU Excuse Shirt, –1 for Coinflip Game On The Road Against An Okay Team, +1 for Winning Is Fun)
Loss will cause me to... mutter something about how this was probably going to happen after the whatnots against Akron and UConn, maybe punt a cow or something.
Win will cause me to... Akron and UConn were flukes! And none of those players are even on the team anymore! Why don't you bring up Michigan's loss to Iowa Pre-flight, you nattering nabob! S-E-C! We're #1!
The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:
While there's zero similarity between Michigan's offense and the drag-race approach Indiana takes, a lot of the weaknesses exposed against the Hoosiers are the same ones exposed against a more conventional UCF team: Penn State doesn't get a ton of pass rush and lacks anything approximating a star. This makes them like Michigan's defense, except lighter (the SDE is 250, a LB is 200) and more injured. Michigan should be able to manball them, or at least force them into similar overplays against manballing that leave secondary members on islands with Gallon and Funchess. Michigan will move the ball and score.
On the other side of the ball, it's another passing spread. Expect an outing similar to the one Michigan had against Notre Dame where Michigan has its issues stopping the opponent until it reaches the redzone, whereupon the constricted field and general inability of the opponent to grind it out causes them to be less efficient than M. One factor in Penn State's favor if this scenario comes to fruition: O'Brien is a full-on Romer convert who will go for anything plausible. Michigan's going to have to make some fourth down stops to win.
While I think Michigan will win, there's a huge swing in the QB turnover category that means I won't be surprised if Michigan loses or runs rampant.
Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:
- Gardner turns it over six times. Spencer Brinton replaces him in the second half.
- Tackle over is still quite frequent; Michigan passes more from it, using a back to help AJ Williams and going max protect deep several times. Gardner's YPA is over 10.
- Two PSU drives in the redzone come up empty as BOB goes for it and Mattison dials up a stuff.
- Michigan, 32-24.
I hope so. It would be very depressing to see a true freshman QB shred the secondary.
"Hackenberg is a statute"
And a freshman at that, so he's a statute of limitations (har har).
If the secondary gets shredded, it'll be their WR that does the damage.
It's amazing to me Mgoblog survived this long without your insights. This will be Hoke's best road victory hands down. Beaver Stadium will be rockin'
and the former was a home game, while the latter was a neutral site game.
I have stuck my head out of the bunker, but will not fully come out until we exit Happy Valley happily with a solid win.
I think we're better...but HAVE YOU SEEN US PLAY WELL ON THE ROAD? In that type of atmosphere? Not really. Gardener better do something besides panic and turn the ball over. Oline better show up. With improvement. Same eith dline. Hate to be a Debbie downer but c'mon guys. Win a big game in the road.
Nearly 51 trips around the sun have taught me that it is impossible to predict what will happen.
At Penn State is willing to admit Joe Paterno harbored a pedophile
What's the deal with the Cage user handle? I'm familiar with his story. Like I said, just curious why you went with that.
He had a similar incident to the one that involved explosives and a railroad tie. Only it occurred on stage of filming a porn scene, and it wasn't a railroad tie.
he/she didn't answer if that was the case.
Picking nits and ruining the moment, here, it was a homemade tamping rod. Of course, that would work with double entendre as well.
I'm reminded often of the possible dis concordance of head trauma/surgery with functionality. PG, as you know, was an interesting case. I think of him often, especially in regards to frontal lobe injuries.
broad, general thought brought about by my reading of this review and subsequent shrug. I am as big a Michigan fan as ever. I lived and died with the basketball team every step of the way, there is no general decline of my Michigan love and addiction. That being said, I am finding myself strangely and uncomfortably complacent in my fandom. I want to get excited for this game, I want really do, just like I wanted to watch last week with real investment and excitement. I am just finding myself, eh, like not really caring as much as I want to and as much as I always have. I feel like a metaphor for our student section. I don't like this feeling. Does anybody else share this feeling? Why is it here? Is it going to go away?
I think the close games against Akron and Uconn put a celing on this team for some people. Many think that even though we're 5-0, going for 6-0, we still have no legit shot to get to the Rose Bowl or the National Championship like a lot of people thought before the season.
Not saying I think like that, actually I think this team is much better than people give it credit for, but that might explain some of your apathy.
I really hope that nobody thought we had a legitimate shot at going to the National Championship. That wasn't ever going to happen.
The Rose Bowl is a possibility, but has always been an outside shot. And Oregon would *kill* us.
Not that I disagree with what you are saying, but I doubt many people believed Notre Dame had a legitimate shot at going to the NCG last year. Anything can happen.
and believing that it will happen are two way different things.
You are suffering from post-UCONN/Akron malaise. Jimmy Carter described the same thing in 1979 about the 70's. It's like: We now know we aren't as good as I thought we were, so, I'm not going to emotionally invest in this thing.
Basically, you're protecting yourself, aren't you. You don't want to get too excited about a team that suggests it's going to crash hard at some point, and when it's really painful -- e.g. against Sparty (who'll only complete 2 forward passes that day).
What will change that? The team getting f'ing good. If we crush PSU by 24, then start smashing our November opponents similarly towards the Deathmarch with The Evil Empire, your interest is going to go up, up, up.
worries me. While I want to believe it is just a product of the moment, and the less than inspiring efforts against Akron and UConn, I feel like it is kind of transcending that. I mean, when can we be good? At what point this year can Michigan be recognized as being good? With the Big Ten reputation being what it is nationally, does anybody care? Will anybody care? Is it possible for Michigan to be good right now? Is it possible for any Big Ten team to actually be good again unless and until a Big Ten team gets to the national championship and beats Alabama or LSU? I just feel like with the increased national focus of college football and the overall national perspective about the Big Ten, this is all starting to just feel like kind of a futile exercise at this point. I am not saying I care what "they" think, I am just not quite sure what I want as a fan, ya know? I just can't get a pulse on what wins mean anymore in this conference and at this time. I know this is all a little existential for a Penn State game preview, but the basketball team going to the Final Four reminded me what my fandom used to feel like for football, and I am having a realization that it has in fact changed.
Who cares what anybody else thinks about the B1G or how UM stacks up against team X? We are not the ones playing and while there is a certain vicarious thrill we as fans may get when our team wins, that comes with the tradeoff that we have no control over the outcome. It may be a defense mechanism if you find yourself less excited or confident about this game.
Before the season and early into it, there were a lot of posts on here with high expectations and then everybody collectively checked themselves when there were a couple close wins against inferior opponents. Fortunately, this doesn't mean the season is doomed, even if expectations may be tempered.
Here are some examples of other teams that had early struggles but had good seasons:
This is a normal reaction to realizing that all of life is suffused with old age, sickness and death. The truth behind all truths is that life involves suffering. A second truth is that the basis of this suffering is wanting to win and not wanting to lose. The third important truth is that there's a way out of this suffering, which leads us to a fourth truth. The answer to suffering is Teamocil. Or Welbutrin. But I prefer Teamocil for the side-effects.
Thus spake Siddhartha.
or Zarathustra. Or something...
... not a one season flash in the pan. It may seem like Hoke is just reiterating 'coach-speak' when he says his goals for the football team are winning B1G championships and competing in the Rose Bowl, but he's on to something. Until we are winning 3-4 B1G championships per decade and competing against the best the PAC 12 has to offer (who most consider the 2nd best conference and beginning to challenge the F'ing SEC), we shouldn't expect to be in the conversation for the National Championship, or the upcoming 4-team playoffs. The Wolverines have their destiny in their own hands, and it's as simple as keep winning on the football field, start racking up Bowl wins, and keep making progress on the recruiting trail. The rest will take care of itself, and as a Michigan fan, our own sense of well-being will be best served with a heaping side of patience... we're moving in the right direction. A convincing victory in Happy Valley, with little or no turnovers, should convince all observers (without an agenda) that UM is making progress; unfortunately, most of the national media writers who vote in the AP have just such an agenda... but I really do believe a ranking in the top 20 is all Michigan currently deserves... and if we lose to Penn State, not even that.
There are a number of reasons why many of us feel this way.
We are in our seventh consecutive year of our team being unpredictable and inconsistent.
This feels a bit like a throw-away year because those of us who follow the team closely have been talking about 2014 and 2015 being the breakout years.
Plus a lot if us thought this team, while not being elite, would look stronger than it has thus far.
It's frustration, malaise, and impatience melded together.
I will also admit to harboring bitterness in regards to the lack of upperclass talent on this team...as a result of the efforts of the previous coaching staff.
setting coaching staff aside -- it feels like 2009 or 2010 and we are collectively holding our breaths and hoping the wheels don't fall off. Penn State was right in the midst of the wheels falling off in those years.
I understand. I hate to bring this up, but after the way Michigan started strong in some of the RR years and then limped to the finish is probably still lingering for some people. I think some fans are waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I don't know if "complacent" propoerly describes my mental status right now, but your overall disposition is eerily similar to mine. I definitely wasn't jacked up before the Gopher game, and usually the first B1G game of the year gets my blood flowing back to pre-season levels. I think Akron and UConn deflated me more than I originally thought. The only cure for this borderline malaise is a good ol' curb-stomping of future foes. So I guess I answered my own question...replace "complacent" with "malaise" and we're on the same page.
what I do HATE feeling is so damned uncomfortable that my skin is almost crawling a day in advance of the damned game because I am so unsure which DG shows up and so anxious for these guys to dispell the ghosts of Akron and CT Present (with a tip of the ol' sombrero to Charles Chickens).
I think that Borges continues to play the game pretty close to the chest, that this is no Devin Gardner coming out party, and that therefore we win but win small. And I think that slowly bringing Devin back to full speed is a good plan, given his psyche. But every game this year except ND has been a kind of exercise in caution, with required baby aspirin at each step. At least in November, win or lose, we/they will be forced to pull out the stops.
if you need help getting fired up try:
1) drinking whiskey - before long youll get upset with a play that ONLY goes for 6 yards
2) listen to the MSU pregrame show - always pisses me off
3) yell at the tv - if you pretend they can hear you but are just ignoring you it works even better
4) drop copious amounts of pcp - you will be riled up for sure...for most likely 2-3 days
and most importantly,
5) its UM football - we only get 12-14 games a year so enjoy them to their fullest. GET F'ING PUMPED!
p.s. i read your post to myself in an eeyore voice. it was entertaining...and sad. dont be sad
We all loved Michigan football. Innocently. Then came the night games, the hype, College Gameday, flyovers, helmet stickers, Legens Patches, Seven Nation Army, the "Michigan fergodsakes" mystique, and even a Final Four.
Now remove it all. No special UTL, no special jerseys. A good-not-great start to the season. Just a regular game with the absence of marketing. And you have a bland taste in your mouth, where that would have once been tasty.
It isn't marketing. Jeebus. We don't need special jerseys to get excited. What everyone else describes above is pretty on point, but one thing this isn't is a lack of "marketing".
P.S.- Please don't reply, if you say that word three times DB might hear you.
You mean Betelgeuse?
michigan is going to flee the box and...?
Pass defend? At least, I assumed he was being all clever by making "Pass Defense vs. Penn State" the very next thing written.
blake countess will take a pick 6 to the house
Seriously. Possibly two. Don't rule it out.
What a pick 6 is? Taking it to the house is redundant
that "redundant" actually means "unnecessary or superfluous" and not "repetitive" as many people think? (not saying that you didn't know, just getting my nerd on)
Be unnecessary or superfluous?
Not that all things repetitive are unnecessary.
I've got a pretty good feeling Countess will take a pick six to the house for a TD and give our team six points tonight.
takes a long touchdown run into the endzone for a touchdown.
Oooo, I'm sorry. We were looking for "Borges sucks" or "Fire Rich Rod." So that'll cost you all your remaining MGoPoints.