Preview: Penn State 2010 Comment Count

Brian

Other stuff: Mathlete preview. PSU drive chart against Illinois. Linebacker U previews it from the PSU side of things.

Essentialspenn-state-logo

WHAT Michigan at Penn State
WHERE Beaver Stadium, Happy Valley, PA
WHEN 8:00 Eastern, October 30th 2010
THE LINE Michigan -3
TELEVISION National on ESPN
WEATHER Clear, mid-40s
Negligible wind

Run Offense vs Penn State

This is hard to get a read on due to key injuries on both sides. Michigan expects that David Molk, Denard Robinson, and Michael Shaw will be ready to go after the bye week. Any could still be nursing injuries that make them less effective. Penn State's situation is considerably murkier. We know FS Nick Sukay and DE Eric Latimore are out. The following players are all somewhere between questionable and probable:

  • LBs Khairi Fortt (stinger, DNP Minnesota), Gerald Hodges (broken leg; played against Minnesota and got two tackles), Bani Gbadyu (played vs Minnesota), LB Michael Mauti (played vs Minnesota)
  • DEs Jack Crawford (DNP Minnesota) and Sean Stanley (situational pass rush, not actually injured but in the JoePa doghouse).

All but Crawford (who is very doubtful) are likely to play. At what level is unknown.

The DE issues have been so severe that 310 pound freshman DT Jordan Hill started outside against Minnesota and played most of the game. He was not good, providing zero pass rush and looking like a train trying to double back when the Gophers ran misdirection against him. If he plays much against Michigan he'll be crazy vulnerable on the read option. Penn State is experimenting with freshman Fortt as a standup DE, but he's 230 pounds and should be crazy vulnerable to getting donkeyed by Lewan or Dorrestein. Absent Crawford, Penn State is picking its poison.

The other DE is usually Pete Massaro, a redshirt sophomore who missed last year with an ACL tear. He's a thousand times better than anyone else PSU played against Minnesota, but he's just a guy at the moment.

The interior line is still very good. Ollie Ogbu, who you may remember stuffing DeBord stretches in the 2007 Penn State game, is now a Brooks Bollinger Memorial Eighth Year Senior; Devon Still was a touted recruit and is now entering his upperclass years. They have consistently penetrated opposing offensive lines and are usually the guys responsible for PSU shutting down a run play—Ogbu has 29 tackles and 5.5 TFLs already; Still has 5.5 TFL, three of those sacks. They're thin past the starters, however. Backup DTs have one solo tackle between them. 

The linebackers have not lived up to expectations. Don't take my word for it:

Penn State has decided to rent out the "Linebacker U" moniker this season to just about any other team not named Penn State.  The group of linebackers are not playing the way we have come to expect our linebackers to play.  I'm not sure if it is just this group of guys, or if we were spoiled by having such amazing linebackers (Dan Connor, Sean Lee, Paul Posluszny) with great instincts that we just have come to expect all of our LBs to read and react to plays as quick as that trio did. …We need this group to play better if there is any chance we are going to upset Michigan.

bani-gbadyu In the Penn State games I've watched Colasanti and Mauti have eaten a lot of blocks. PSU fans like Mauti better than their other guys, so I may just have caught him on an off day or coming off an injury. Colasanti is slow of foot and if a blocker gets out to him he's done. PSU is rotating heavily so Hodges, Gbadyu (right), Nate Stupar, and possibly Fortt are likely to see snaps. Fortt and Hodges are athletic but mistake-prone; Gbadyu and Stupar are veterans no one thinks much of—Gbadyu seems like an Ezeh-level whipping boy for PSU fans.

From this come the numbers:

Opponent Carries Yards TD YPC
Alabama 32 190 1 5.9
Iowa 35 127 1 3.6
Illinois 54 282 0 5.2
Minnesota 34 140 0 4.1

That's three bad performances and a decent one against Iowa. Minnesota is not good at football. Against beleaguered Purdue the week before they managed 4.3 a carry. It is not good when your run defense is marginally ahead of this year's Boilers.

After a bye week Michigan is seventh nationally in rushing offense, averaging 6.5 YPC. Iowa and Michigan State slowed the Denard Robinson train down, and "slowed" may not be the right word. Robinson still averaged 5.8 YPC against Iowa and the team as a whole put out 196 yards on 41 carries against what was the #2 rushing defense in the country and is currently #8. If Michigan hadn't ended up in a big hole thanks to turnovers and its defense they could have put up truly epic numbers given the competition. At this point questions are dispersed: this is a for real rushing attack with a for real offensive line and the explosive Robinson.

Michigan's wild card here is Michael Shaw. He was splitting carries with Vincent Smith approximately down the middle before an injury sidelined him for Indiana and limited him to just seven carries against Michigan State and Iowa; he's got the breakaway speed Smith lacks and if healthy could provide a secondary run threat with the potential to test Penn State's battered safety corps.

Key Matchup: Denard Robinson against DE Not Named Massaro. With Crawford out and the delicious possibility of lumbering freshman DT in space, Michigan should be able to put its most explosive player in advantageous positions with the zone read. If it's Fortt, Robinson should be running off tackle at him frequently. Either way that's the place to attack.

Pass Offense vs Penn State

chaz-powell 
nickelback was a receiver last year

Penn State's results to date:

Opponent Att Cmp Yards TD Int Eff YPA
Alabama 24 16 229 2 0 174.3 9.5
Iowa 22 16 227 1 1 165.3 10.3
Illinois 19 15 151 1 0 163.1 7.9
Minnesota 49 26 299 3 1 120.4 6.1

Not so good. You've got the two game manager types that saw their teams run out to insurmountable leads of two touchdowns in the first half and put the passing in the garage, Nathan Scheelhaase, and Adam Weber, and three of the four put up impressive passer efficiency ratings. The Mathlete has them 37th but a lot of that was  built in games against Kent State and Temple; Iowa and Alabama offset with Illinois being hugely negative and Minnesota positive but not enough to offset the Illinois game.

Penn State's pass rush is weak. They're 97th in sacks; as discussed in the previous section they are getting very little from the injury-wracked DEs. Whenever Hill or Latham is out there Michigan is going to be able to single block without trouble; Penn State's best bet may be to throw that guy against Lewan in the hopes that Massaro or Stanley can generate something against Dorrestein. In passing situations Stanley or Fortt should come in to replace the guy who's essentially a DT, which will provide more of a challenge.

The PSU secondary is also thin and young after Sukay's injury. They've moved Drew Astorino to the free safety position and he sounds like a faster combination of Kovacs and Cam Gordon—small, iffy tackler, questionable angles. The differences are in speed and experience. He's returning starter who was honorable mention ABT last year and has returned some punts. The second guy may be freshman Malcolm Willis, who was forced into the lineup after third safety Andrew Dailey had some minor injury problems of his own. Willis tackled well and had more of an impact on the game than either of the starters.

The corners aren't much deeper. D'Anton Lynn is a league-average corner who Penn State fans are very much in favor of for the same reason Troy Woolfolk's injury caused the rending of garments in Ann Arbor. The other guy, Stephen Morris, came in for a beating after the Minnesota game for sloppy coverage and horrible tackling. There are rumors that Chaz Powell might leap into the starting lineup or at least see significant time. This would be risky, since Powell has taken the same "you're a corner, I mean WR, I mean corner, I mean WR, I mean corner" career path that James Rogers has.

That lack of depth means it's going to be another boring week on the UFR D formation chart. Expect nothing but 4-3 unless Michigan gets in third and a billion.

This should be a much easier matchup for Michigan than Iowa and (sigh) Michigan State were. PSU is scrambling to get any sort of pass rush and their linebackers drag out of position a ton in zone; all the rotation makes it likely that no one player will have the consistency in drops either the Iowa or MSU linebackers (who never come off the field) did.

Key Matchup: Roundtree and Gallon vs Lynn and Morris (Powell?) on the bubble. Michigan's most effective passing attacks come from threatening the bubble against teams that can't handle it, then exploiting their over-reaction to it after it works the first few times. With dodgy tackling cornerbacks and injury issues at safety, Michigan should be able to give Denard some easy throws and go from there.

Run Defense vs Penn State

This is going to be slightly hard to believe but this should be… advantage… Michigan?

NotSureIfSerious

If Mike Martin is 100%, yes, serious. Penn State against BCS opponents and Minnesota:

Opponent Carries Yards TD YPC
Alabama 31 127 0 4.1
Iowa 21 76 0 3.6
Illinois 24 81 0 3.4
Minnesota 30 145 1 4.8

Okay, so no one's going to mistake Michigan's D with Alabama, Iowa, or (sigh) Illinois any time soon but the throbbing danger sign for the Penn State rushing game isn't so much the YPC numbers but the distribution. On the road against Alabama in Robert Bolden's second start the run/pass breakdown was 50-50. Against Iowa, Penn State called 43 passes and 21 runs. With a freshman quarterback! In Iowa City! Minnesota even did a somewhat respectable job one week after giving up 126 yards on 12 carries to Dan Dierking. Northern Illinois put up 297 rushing yards on them. Penn State couldn't do much of anything before inserting Silas Redd late.

What's wrong with the Penn State rush offense? Pick a problem. The top two tight ends are out for the year, leaving Penn State with a true freshman or WR Brett Brackett—they literally cannot field a reasonable "big" package. Their fullback is a converted linebacker who can lay the wood but is really erratic. And the offensive line is a shambles. They've got one guy—guard Stefen Wisnewski—who's okay to good and four guys who are turrible. The tackles are 6'3" and 6'4" and can't move. When Penn State tries stretch plays they get slanted past like they're not there. The interior line cannot get a push on anyone. Royster apparently showed up to camp overweight and lacks the je ne sais quoi that will see him break PSU's all time rushing record sometime Saturday.

The many limitations of the blockers have seen Penn State totally shelve the stretch, which has been the play most deadly against Michigan's combination of mediocre/freshman defensive ends and overrun-happy linebackers. They're also limited in their ability to pull linemen—about all they can do with consistent(-ish) success is do inside zone stuff and drive block.

The lone bright spot has been freshman Redd, a darting runner with outstanding balance and the quickness to turn a broken play into something positive. Though he occasionally does that freshman thing where you try to bounce everything outside because you think it's still high school, he's PSU's version of Hopkins—fans are clamoring for more of him. Stepfon Green, who you may remember from such plays as "Gratuitous 80 Yard Screen Touchdown," is still around; he's a north-south runner with excellent top end speed but not a lot of wiggle—i.e. just the kind of guy Michigan desperately needs but Penn State can't use much because a busted block is a two yard gain with him.

On the other side of the ball, Michigan may have found a middle linebacker in Kenny Demens. If they have found such a thing and he's actually the guy he seemed like against Iowa, Michigan's run defense could (should?) improve from meh to somewhat respectable. We'll probably see some holes in his game against a team that's had an opportunity to scout him, but those will probably show up in the passing game. Penn State is not at the point where they can do much other than the basics.

Mike Martin has been proclaimed 100% after the bye week; if that's accurate Penn State isn't going to get much in the A gaps this week and will have to head further outside, where Roh can be contained and Banks/Black beat up. The DEs versus the tackles will be a matchup of twin weaknesses and could provide Penn State what running game they're going to have.

A bold prediction: Michigan holds PSU under 4.0 YPC.

Key matchup: Banks/Kovacs/Mouton keeping contain on runs that threaten to go outside the tackle. PSU isn't going to get much up the middle if Martin is healthy and Demens for real, but Iowa made a lot of hay on the outside.

Pass Defense vs Penn State

There are three entirely different balls of wax here depending on who actually plays for Penn State. Kevin Newsome is the easy one. He'll run a wildcat offense that will throw only when absolutely necessary and will be super bad at it. It doesn't sound like Robert Bolden is going to play but if he does he will be able to cut apart Michigan's secondary if given time.

matt-mcgloin 
gunslinger w/ gunslinger beard

The most likely opponent tomorrow, though, is walk-on Matt McGloin. McGloin came on in relief of Bolden and went 6 of 13 for 76 yards, two beautiful touchdowns, and one awful interception. Apparently he fancies himself a Favre-ian gunslinger; he reminded me of a walk-on version of Forcier. He's capable of almost anything down to down. The two touchdowns to Derek Moye could not have been better throws, especially the second—a picture-perfect fade against great coverage. His interception was a Sheridan special, a vastly underthrown ball chucked into double coverage. Several other incompletions were no-hopers to Tacopants. And that's all we know. Those thirteen passes are McGloin's career to date.

Penn State's receivers are huge or tiny with little in between. The two outside guys are 6'5" Derek Moye and 6'3" Justin Brown, with 6'5" quasi-TE Brett Bracket playing a lot in the slot and sometimes moving down to be a highly ineffective inline blocker. 5'7" Devon Smith is the slot waterbug du jour; Graham Zug also gets time but has been a drop machine this fall and finds himself marginalized. No one in this unit, even the tiny guy, is likely to shake many tackles. They are not YAC guys.

This will no doubt bring thunder down from the sky and see McGloin put up 500 yards, but the PSU receiving corps might actually be a good matchup for the Michigan secondary. James Rogers may not be able to change directions without going BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP but he is 6'1" with good leaping ability; JT Floyd isn't quite as big but he's a decent-sized corner too. Remember how Michigan neutralized Michael Floyd? Yeah, that could happen.

Michigan could also see a reprise of that weird 2008 game where Sheridan owned the Metrodome. McGloin may be a walk-on but so is the best player in Michigan's secondary. I have no doubt guys will be open and coverages busted as Penn State mounts some number of legitimate scoring drives between 2 and n.

On passing downs Michigan will probably drop eight, count on Martin, Roh, and Van Bergen to slice through PSU's all-guard offensive line, and wait for bad throws and decisions. There should be enough of those for Michigan fans to feel as good about their defense as they did after the first half of the Notre Dame game.

Key matchup: Demens, Mouton, Rotating Spur, and Kovacs against Brackett and Smith underneath. McGloin is going to be throwing a bunch of short routes and Michigan's going to have to cover them so McGloin can go out there and just have some fun in his Wrangler jeans by throwing several horrific interceptions.

Special Teams

Massive Penn State advantage because of one thing: the kicker. Colin Wagner is 14 of 17 on the year. Michigan's rotation is 2 of 8. The punt and punt return units are basically a wash, with Michigan looking a little less awesome in raw yardage but not enough that it seems like it will be a difference.

Kickoffs will be advantage Penn State, as M decommit Anthony Fera is getting them to the endzone and Michigan's kickers are getting them to the eight. Penn State has a big advantage in kick return yardage but since that's mostly from a touchdown against Youngstown State its relevance is questionable.

Key Matchup: STOP KICKING THE DAMN BALL

Intangibles

tumblr_l9y0vi2p321qzt6upo1_500

Cheap Thrills

Worry if...

  • The Anointed Kenny Demens reverts to The Enigmatic.
  • Denard's throwing is still goofy even after the bye week.
  • Martin does not look 100%.

Cackle with knowing glee if...

  • Penn State actually rolls with Freshman DT as a contain guy on the zone read.
  • The Hopkins is unleashed.
  • Penn State has to bring a safety into the box.

Fear/Paranoia Level: 4 (Baseline 5; +1 for Road Night Game In Happy Valley, –1 for Against A Walk-On With Inadvisable Beard, –1  for Behind An Offensive Line Equivalent To Michigan's 2008 Edition, –1 for Versus A Defensive Line Choosing Between A DT And A LB At The Contain Denard Position, +1 for General Overconfidence Check, +1 for We Make The Turnovers Real Good, –1 for But Seriously Kenny Demens.)

Desperate need to win level: 10 (Baseline 5; +1 for Penn State Is Not Good, +1 for Bowl Eligibility, +1 for Margin Of Error Is Out The Window, +1 for If You Lose To This Shambles Of A Team And Their Walk-On Quarterback It's Curtains, +1 for And Who Wants To Draw The Curtain Over Denard?)

Loss will cause me to... spend the next four weeks talking about Harbaugh.

Win will cause me to... exhale.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

If Bolden does not play, Penn State will require several acts of God to win. Here is why in a statistic: Michigan's rushing defense is giving up 4.0 YPC. Penn State's rushing defense is giving up 4.0 YPC. They are equivalent. Michigan's rush offense is ripping foes for 6.5 YPC; Penn State is trundling along at… 4.0 YPC. This holds up even when you get all fancy. By the Mathlete's reckoning, the #2 Michigan rush offense is going up against the #53 Penn State rush defense. The inverse matchup is an evenly matched pillow fight that sees #93 take on #96. And most of this went down before Kenny Demens supplanted Ezeh and Penn State started scrambling for real at defensive end and safety.

If Penn State is going to win this game it's going to be by shredding a very shreddable Michigan secondary. If Bolden is slinging it around like he did against Minnesota, Penn State can keep within striking distance and all it will take is an all-too-predictable pile of Michigan mistakes to lose the game. If it's some combination of McGloin and Newsome the punts and picks will be too frequent for Penn State deal with, mistakes or no.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:

  • Hopkins gets more carries than any other back.
  • Robinson hits 150 yards rushing and 200 passing.
  • Special teams costs Michigan something between 3 and 7 points.
  • Michigan, 31-21.

Comments

WeaponX

October 29th, 2010 at 3:06 PM ^

A fine speech.  If not for the fact that you make specific references to the season and the game, I would think that you were quoting an actualy pre-game speech from the glory days.  I got tingles. 

I am both so scared and so excited for this game.  I guess that's what fear/paranoia level is about!

I would +1 you if I had the mgopoints to be allowed to do so.

stillMichigan

October 29th, 2010 at 12:54 PM ^

Just wish Brian would analyze Michigan Run vs. PSU D last to remove that huge knot I get in my gut when our secondary is scrutinized. 

Brian's fear/paranoia of 4 seems a bit low, of course my baseline is 10 these days. 

4godkingandwol…

October 29th, 2010 at 12:55 PM ^

... my expectation going in, my expectation still.  I'm more concerned about offensive and defensive improvement and consistency from a judgment of the coaches standpoint.  And given the youth (yes, that's mostly on the coaches), I'm willing to give it another year.

 

michgoblue

October 29th, 2010 at 1:12 PM ^

This PSU team is a less talented version (way less) than the ND team that we faced when Dayne Crist went out of the game.  If I recall, our D help up pretty amazingly when Crist was not in the game.  (I recall a few actual 3 and outs).    Brian's 4/10 fear and paranoia level seems about right.

Yostal

October 29th, 2010 at 1:14 PM ^

the Russian proverb: Доверяй, но проверяй "doveryai, no proveryai", or "Trust, but verify."

I trust, based on everything that I have read that Michigan should be able to win this game.

However, until I see that 6 in the W column, until I can verify that, I will be very very afraid.

Доверяй, но проверяй

Yostal

October 29th, 2010 at 5:46 PM ^

In CNN's "Cold War" series (which cannot be purchased on DVD due to reclassification by the DoD but can be seen on Google Video), episode 22 "Star Wars" , the NSC brought in a Russia expert before the Geneva summit and was told that in order to capture Reagan's attention, tell him a story, and give him small short bursts.  So she hit upon the old Russian proverb "doveriai, no proveria", "trust, but verify" and Reagan's eyes lit up because she knew that was exactly his feeling toward dealing with Gorbachev.  Trust, but verify.

RadioSimon1983

October 29th, 2010 at 1:20 PM ^

with short easy passes for Denard.  Get his confidence up early.  He was clearly rattled after some bad throws in the past two games.

 

Also run at their crap outside line like mad.

VaUMWolverine

October 29th, 2010 at 1:27 PM ^

definitely send me underground. Ugh. I dont even want to think about it. On the flip side, I told all of my friends before the season started (and tweeted it fwiw) that Michigan would go 8-4 and win a bowl game. A win against PSU would go a long way in helping that come true. I also want to state the obvious...if Michigan doesnt turn the ball over, they can win against any Big10 team.

victors2000

October 29th, 2010 at 1:50 PM ^

It's so funny how forgotten it is that we are 5-2!  We are going to wake up Sunday as if from a bad dream; we'll be 6-2, bowl bound, in the top 25...we'll be walking on sunshine...

griesecheeks

October 29th, 2010 at 2:15 PM ^

Michigan 34-27.

M-    7  13  14  0

P-  14    3    7  3  

Scoring:

P- McGloin 20 yard TD pass to Moye (PAT Good)

M- Hopkins 3 yard TD run (PAT GOOD)

P- Royster 18 yard TD run (PAT GOOD)

= P 14, M 7 after 1st Q

M- Robinson 25 yard TD pass to Roundtree (PAT FAILED)

M- Robinson 5 yard TD run (PAT GOOD)

P- FG Wagner 40 yds (END OF HALF)

= M 20, P 17 after 1st Half

M- Robinson 28 yard TD run (PAT GOOD)

P- Royster 5 yard TD run (PAT GOOD)

M- Forcier 12 yard TD pass to Koger (PAT GOOD)

= M 34, P 24 after 3rd Q

P- Wagner 35 Yd FG

= M 34, P 27 End of Game.

 

In Happy Valley, on TV in primetime, Penn St will do more than they probably should be able to do to stay in this game. I'm calling 2 Michigan turnovers that will prevent us from putting this game away. Denard throws another early int, and Hopkins fumbles.

McGloin throws a first drive TD and Royster has an annoyingly effective game that will cause many of us to start ripping our hair out. Generally, he'll look better than he should, but will cool off in the 2nd half.

I agree with Brian's prediction for Denard. He'll have a solid game in both areas, but won't necessarily be lights-out good. I do think we'll once again see Tate at some point, and not even because of an injury.

Broekhuizen hasn't missed an extra point, you say? Oops, well, he misses one tomorrow in the 2nd Q.

Demens generally regresses back to "Enigmatic", is a culprit in the PSU rushing attack, but seals the game with an interception late in the 4th Q. One of the freshmen corners makes one great interception despite more of the usual.

Rushing:

M - Robinson 25-155-2, Hopkins 10-45-1, Smith 10-35-0, Shaw 5-25-0

P - Royster 25-125-2 (I disagree on this front with Brian... i think McGloin will have annoying success passing, and will loosen us up in the running game), Green 15-55-0

Passing:

M - Robinson 12-18-150-1-1, Forcier 6-8-75-1-0

P - McGloin 18-35-235-1-2

Receiving:

M - Roundtree 6-90-1, Hemingway 5-75-1, V Smith 4-40-0

Princetonwolverine

October 29th, 2010 at 2:31 PM ^

What are the odds with a bye week we have worked on a fake kick? Take your pick: kickoff, punt or field goal. Extra points are our strength.

InterM

October 29th, 2010 at 3:17 PM ^

Before we try the onside kick, I'd like to see a regular kickoff land in-bounds.  I'm all for the fake field goal, however -- although it'll be hard to trick an opponent into thinking they need to defend against a real one.

UMSwoosh

October 29th, 2010 at 3:14 PM ^

I would just like to see our offense take advantage of a defensive stop. Multiple times this year we have actually made a stop and the offense comes up empty, putting the pressure back on the defense. Let's convert to go up 14 points and we can make different defensive calls based on the offense they would be running.

iawolve

October 29th, 2010 at 3:48 PM ^

First, they were getting rolled so they had to pass. Second, Iowa shut down at halftime and utilized Lloyd-ball so the YPC suffered a bit. I don't feel the PSU defense over achieved that game. Honestly a pretty boring game to be at considering it was at night with IA-PSU..

KMJ

October 30th, 2010 at 12:53 PM ^

I think of Mario Manningham in the endzone with time expiring.

Also...McGloin may be a Wrangler jeans-wearing gunslinger, but the PSU O-Line is not good.  Very few QBs have the ability to be good and remain healthy with a bad O-Line.

I predict Denard gets 200+ (10+ yards/carry) on the ground and 200+ in the air.  The only thing that prevents this is if Michigan intentionally limits his carries (in which I predict 100+ yards running and 270+ in the air for Denard).

Finally, in a reverse jinx, I predict that Sparty wins at Iowa by a final score of 7-0 on a  trick play called, "Jail break!"  Too soon?

Hannibal.

October 29th, 2010 at 4:33 PM ^

Most of the projections for McGloin in this game have been way too optimistic on his behalf, methinks.  Walk-ons are walk-ons for a reason.  Walk-ons with 13 career passing attempts = death.  We have found this out the extremely hard way here at Michigan.  McGloin is Nick Sheridan.  He went 6 for 13 against Minny for 76 yards, with 42 of those yards coming on one pass attempt.  A lot of people like to say "but wait, Nick Sheridan vs Minnesoota!".  My response is "yeah, what of it?"  Sheridan had 200 passing yards on 30 attempts and got away with throwing numerous balls into coverage.  And that was his high point.  I don't see why McGloin is such a big threat to carve us up if Tommy Rees, Nick Montana, and Zach Frazer were incapable of doing just that with a better supporting cast. I won't try to defend our abysmal defense, but the teams that have carved us up in Big Ten play are ranked #1, #3, and #4 in the conference in passing. 

Search4Meaning

October 29th, 2010 at 8:25 PM ^

PSU...

Nu-bee QB, average receivers, ineffective O line, sub standard running game, poor linebacking, weak pass rush, decent DE's and a good kicking game.

 

I'm shaking in fear... ok, maybe not shaking-just a little concerned.

M31 - PSU 24

cjpops

October 30th, 2010 at 1:01 AM ^

Recent history says UM loses this game.
<br>I'm hoping that UM bucks the "late season collapse" trend, but, I don't have a good feeling about this one.
<br>
<br>At night, on road, intense pressure, young team, critical game in grand scheme of things...
<br>
<br>PSU 31
<br>UM 28
<br>
<br>Final comeback drive thwarted by a (predictable?) UM turnover.

David F

October 30th, 2010 at 3:14 PM ^

"Loss will cause me to... spend the next four weeks talking about Harbaugh."

Let's not exaggerate. We are playing Penn St., on the road, on Saturday night. They are not the Penn St. of yore, but they're not a snackycake.

We might lose. We're only 3.5 point favorites. But even so, if we can take care of Illinois and Purdue then Rodriguez will still be around. Heck, he might be around even if we go 6-6.

The upside next year is too high to start rebuilding all over again. As long as the team looks improved throughout this season compared to the previous season, Brandon will keep him around.