Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (55)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Does Expansion Actually Lead to More Recruits From a Certain Region?
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 3 days ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 4 days ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 4 days ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 998 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 809 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 808 views
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 709 views
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 692 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 18 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 17 comments
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 13 comments
  • Does Expansion Actually Lead to More Recruits From a Certain Region?
    maizeonblueaction - 8 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Hockey picks up '15 defenseman, MSU decommit
    3 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 5 Open Thread
    21 replies
  • Midwest Elite 7 on 7
    6 replies
  • OT: Champions League Final - Borussia Dortmund vs Bayern Munich
    39 replies
  • Burke & THJ NBA Draft Workout Videos
    10 replies
  • Urban Meyer regrets the way his Florida tenure ended, said Alabama should have lost three games
    48 replies
  • M v. ULL Super Regional Open Thread
    80 replies
  • I'm meeting Trey Burke today!
    45 replies
  • Mike Farrell: Michigan and Hokies tied in lead for Da'Shawn Hand
    79 replies
  • Help Finding Great Video Clips
    19 replies
  • Friday night drinking thread
    33 replies
  • OT: The Tigers game is very interesting
    99 replies
  • Michigan wrestlers accused of Molotov cocktail possession suspended indefinitely
    67 replies
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    198 replies
  • Softball Super Regional v. Louisiana-Lafayette, game 1
    55 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    198 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 5 Open Thread
    20 replies
  • Hockey picks up '15 defenseman, MSU decommit
    3 replies
  • Urban Meyer regrets the way his Florida tenure ended, said Alabama should have lost three games
    48 replies
  • Mike Farrell: Michigan and Hokies tied in lead for Da'Shawn Hand
    79 replies
  • I'm meeting Trey Burke today!
    45 replies
  • Burke & THJ NBA Draft Workout Videos
    10 replies
  • OT: Champions League Final - Borussia Dortmund vs Bayern Munich
    39 replies
  • Urbs and his obsession with butts
    54 replies
  • Help Finding Great Video Clips
    19 replies
  • Midwest Elite 7 on 7
    6 replies
  • M v. ULL Super Regional Open Thread
    80 replies
  • Michigan wrestlers accused of Molotov cocktail possession suspended indefinitely
    67 replies
  • Friday night drinking thread
    33 replies
  • There should be 110,000 Rubber Chickens at the ND Game
    42 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    198 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    193 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    160 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    151 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    146 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    146 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    141 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    117 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    110 replies
  • OT: The Tigers game is very interesting
    99 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    93 replies
  • M v. ULL Super Regional Open Thread
    80 replies
  • Mike Farrell: Michigan and Hokies tied in lead for Da'Shawn Hand
    79 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Burke says Michigan can be 'just as good' next year with McGary, Robinson III leading

    yes plz

    0 comments
  • SEC coaches with tiny faces

    I don't think they changed Les at all actually

    1 comments
  • This college baseball team is the best at postgame interviews

    national champs baby

    1 comments
  • Rounding up the latest in NCAA absurdities.

    Patrick Hruby is doing God's work.

    0 comments
  • Cornell wrestler tops Michigan's Trey Burke for Sports Illustrated award | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

    first comment: "EVERY ATHLETE HAS ASPIRATIONS OF WINNING AND WE HAVE OUR FAVORITES BUT IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO OTHER STUDENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, TOO!"

    0 comments
  • Burke hearing he'll go two through six in NBA draft

    stupid Pistons and their refusal to tank properly

    0 comments
  • 2013 NHL Draft Prospect: Andrew Copp

    rundown of Michigan's riser

    0 comments
  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Preview: Outback Bowl

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — December 31st, 2012 at 2:05 PM — 55 comments
Filed under:
  • 2013 outback bowl
  • game previews

51eiJHfdAKL._SL500_SS500_[1]Essentials

WHAT Michigan vs South Carolina
WHERE Everybody Loves Raymond Stadium
Tampa Bay, FL
WHEN 1:00 PM Eastern
January 1st, 2013
THE LINE South Carolina –5.5
TELEVISION ESPN
WEATHER partly cloudy, mid-70s, minimal chance of rain

Again this preview assumes that Denard Robinson is basically a wildcat guy when he lines up at quarterback now. Hoke just reiterated that Gardner will start and Robinson will play "some quarterback," and by "some quarterback" he means "wildcat guy."

Run Offense vs South Carolina

hi-res-156590025_crop_exact[1]

happy thoughts

This was two things against Ohio State: Denard Robinson and disaster. Stripped of the one back with any credentials to his name by a gruesome injury to Fitzgerald Toussaint, Michigan all but abandoned any thought of running the ball with the men misnomered "running backs" in the first half, and then proved the wisdom of that decision—if not the wisdom of their second-half playcalling—by getting stuffed almost literally every time they touched the ball after halftime.

The results were grim. Vincent Smith and Thomas Rawls had ten carries between them for a total of 14  yards. Rawls gained a total of two yards on five carries while turning in this career lowlight:

That is likely the point at which we remember Rawls hype deflating entirely as he's relegated to Kevin Grady duty for the rest of his career.

It's not like Rawls is alone in that department. Toussaint followed up a breakout 2011 (1041 yards on 187) by dropping almost two yards from his per-attempt average, going from 5.6 a pop to 3.9. Vincent Smith managed 2.8; Rawls is actually at the top of the heap with 4.2 thanks to a couple of garbage time runs against Purdue and Illinois. When Rawls was forced into the lineup in earnest this November, the results were ugly: 32 carries, 57 yards, less than two yards an attempt. I'd be more receptive to the argument that Rawls saw a lot of short yardage carries that artificially depressed his YPC if he wasn't a major reason he saw so many of those carries by failing to get any YAC on the goal line.

Anyway. The failure of the Michigan running game is comprehensive. The interior line can't block, the tight ends are too young, the tailbacks miserable. Except…

In this context Denard Robinson's season is nothing short of miraculous. His historic season has been obscured by injury and interceptions, but here it is: 1166 yards on 154 carries, an average of 7.6 per despite missing games against Minnesota and Northwestern. That will be a record dating back to at least 1948 (100 carry minimum) if he keeps it above Ty Wheatley's 7.3.

Meanwhile no other player on the roster can grind out half of that outside of garbage time. It is time to shake our fists at the fickle whims of injury and Rich Rodriguez's offensive line recruiting, with a bonus shake at the motley collection of tailbacks on the roster.

…

…

…

keep shaking

…

ok one more

…

Ok. Now, the opponent.

South Carolina's got shiny numbers that are a bit distorted by their rampant sackage. They're 16th nationally, giving up 119 yards a game. Removed 40(!) sacks for 253 yards and opponents do get up to 4.0 yards a pop. This is a good run defense, yeah, but it's not on the same level as Alabama, Notre Dame, MSU, or OSU (when OSU isn't giving up 70-yard touchdowns). The defensive tackles are not pocket-crushers, the safeties like to shoulder-block people down after they get first downs and stand over them like idiots, which might be an asset when Denard breaks into the secondary if any of them have the chutzpah to try that against 16.

Is it going to matter? Probably not. In the game of "can Michigan run a football with Not Denard," bet on "no." Can Michigan effectively integrate Denard into a 20-carry presence if he's not playing quarterback? Well…

Key Matchup: I wonder if two months is enough time for Borges to figure out how to put Denard and Devin on the field at the same time. Denard's great; he can't beat out 10 guys going for him on the snap; just Percy Harvin the guy already and stop holding up a huge sign that says RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN when Denard is at QB. Also you can probably run Gardner some since it's the last game of the year.

[HIT THE JUMP for CLOWNEY THE DRAGON]

Pass Offense vs South Carolina

dm_121218_ncf_clowney_headlines[1]

Clowney is basically Brandon Graham

The headline here is of course the battle between Taylor Lewan and Jadaveon Clowney, both likely top-ten draft picks. If I was South Carolina I might shift that battle to the other side of the line, but as detailed earlier it's pick your poison with the Gamecocks and their 3.3 sacks a game plus bonus bloody decaptitations that happen a split second after the ball is gone. USC defensive ends have more significantly more sacks than Michigan's entire team—Clowney is not a one man show.

Michigan does seem relatively well-prepared for withstanding the South Carolina pass rush since their offense since the Denard Robinson injury has been one long series of unconvincing max-protect play-action passes to Jeremy Gallon. Borges seems to figure that Gallon is too quick for many folks to cover effectively no matter how many guys are in coverage against guys not going downfield, and this has been a relatively good bet. While it's somewhat limited, it's better than risking the above. At the very least Michigan should be planning to line up a tight end next to Schofield to help.

Judging South Carolina's secondary is difficult since it's hard to tell which parts of the pass efficiency numbers are good coverage and which parts are quarterbacks flinging the ball willy-nilly to avoid death by Clowney. On the one hand, Tyler Bray put up 368 yards and 4 TDs. On the other, Aaron Murray struggled to 109 yards and an INT on 31 attempts. On the whole, South Carolina finished 35th in pass efficiency D—good, but not great when you consider the bonus a fierce pass rush usually provides the defense. They can be had… if you can keep your quarterback from coughing up blood. That's easier said than done.

As for Michigan, Devin Gardner's stellar run to kick off a career at quarterback came to something of a thudding halt against the Buckeyes. He read long-to-short effectively on a 75-yard touchdown to Roy Roundtree, but if we are being bracingly honest with ourselves that shirt doesn't fit anymore and that play was more Ohio State busting huge than Michigan doing anything great. If CJ Barnett doesn't go durrr, that's a 15 yards play. Outside of that, 19 Gardner attempts went for 96 yards and an interception.

That shouldn't erase some excellent work turned in during the previous three games. After a shaky start against Minnesota, Gardner dissected Northwestern and Iowa, displaying uncanny deep accuracy and an innate sense for when to scramble. He should continue to get more comfortable rapidly as he transitions back from wide receiver and presents a difficult problem for defenses if Michigan deigns to run the guy, like, on purpose.

Michigan's receivers versus South Carolina cornerbacks look to be a push. Neither has a true star; neither is truly bad, though with Michigan I may be judging by comparison to the RB corps.

Key Matchup: Obviously this is Michigan Blocky Guys versus A Deluge Of Terror.

Run Defense vs South Carolina

AR-120909169[1]

the NFL will never do this

If you haven't seen the Gamecocks play in a while, you might be surprised to find out that they are essentially an RR spread 'n' shred. While neither of South Carolina's quarterbacks will be confused for Denard any time soon, they get plenty of attempts—between them a total of 118. This is a typical example; Spurrier especially loves to pull the ball on short yardage:

That's Dylan Thompson, who got his first start against Clemson. He got sacked four times for 35 yards of damage, and rushed for 73 yards—on purpose!—on 10 other attempts. He was by far the Gamecocks' most effective weapon on the ground in that game. Other Gamecock rushers combined for 96 yards on 31 carries, with one 26-yard inside zone read handoff the only significant gain on the day.

That has been a trend for a while. When Kenny Miles entered after the gruesome Lattimore injury he ground out 3.4 YPC, and even that guy could only crack 100 yards against Vandy, Georgia, and something that purports to be an SEC team named Kentucky. The South Carolina OL is a question mark at best, and Michigan can expect do do something in-between the total obliteration offered up by LSU and Florida and the grinding three-yards-and-cloud-of-dust stuff the Cocks managed against bad defenses post-Lattimore.

Key Matchup: Unblocked defensive ends keeping contain. Michigan's had a few issues with it, and Spurrier has been surprisingly adept at getting those QBs loose on 20-yard keepers.

Pass Defense vs South Carolina

FB-12%20Ace%20Sanders%20vs.%20Georgia[1]

Well, at least Michigan doesn't have to worry about whether JT Floyd will get burned deep in this one. This is because JT Floyd is not playing. In his stead it's likely Courtney Avery moves over from nickel once again. When Michigan goes nickel—something they figure to do relatively infrequently—true freshman Terry Richardson will likely get the call with Delonte Hollowell and Dennis Norfleet waiting in the wings. Collectively, Michigan's secondary now sports one guy over 5'9", and two guys who are basically oompa-loompas in Hollowell and Norfleet.

The good news for Michigan is that South Carolina goes toe to toe with anyone in the country for Oompa-Loompas. Virtually every throw you see tomorrow will be at either a tight end or a 5'9" waterbug. Here's that compilation of every Gamecock passing attempt against Missouri again:

South Carolina throws a ton of short stuff looking for YAC and endeavors to keep their QBs both clean—the South Carolina OL gives up almost as many sacks as Clowney and company acquire—and sane. It works pretty well overall, as the Gamecocks approach the top 20 in passer efficiency, but Michigan's concerns here are more about tackling guys in front of them than worrying about getting burned over the top.

That's going to be hard down Floyd and getting paper thin at corner, especially given that the nickelback is necessarily going to be capital-t Tiny. Ace Sanders is legit.

WHY U NO MOVE HIM TO CORNERBACK

There's nothing Michigan can do to prevent him from getting matched up on a fresh face at nickel or a linebacker, neither of which is an appealing prospect. Thompson does tend to sit in the pocket a long, long time to get those thing developing, so Mattison may be able to confuse that guy into some bad decisions, but if South Carolina is just chucking screens at the guy I can see that going poorly in four-wide sets where he's to the boundary. In those situations Jake Ryan will split to the field and then it's either Raymon Taylor moving over to play boundary or a leetle guy trying to fend off a block.

Also, we have little information on how Thompson affects the pass game. Initial indications are Spurrier is more comfortable letting him chuck it downfield. Thompson had a much more OBC QB line than anything Shaw's turned in this year, hitting 23 of 41 for 310 yards, 3 TDs, and an INT. That's still not quite there, but it's not bad for a first start.

Michigan's safeties have been a no touchdown zone for most of the year and should remain that way; I suspect that dink and dunk is going to be effective enough to move the ball despite what projects to be a deficient South Carolina rushing attack.

Key Matchup: Greg Mattison versus confusing Dylan Thompson. Kid is new, and figures to be in some passing downs. Hello okie.

Special Teams

As mentioned above, Ace Sanders is scary. He's averaging almost 15 yards a punt return and has a touchdown to go with the ridiculous Missouri jukefest embedded above.

FEI has the Gamecocks' punt return game in the top 25; South Carolina also has an excellent kicker.

The rest of their special teams are terrible. For some reason they don't use Sanders on kick returns, which rank 118th. Punting is meh, and they are poor at kickoffs.

Michigan does not have Will Hagerup, he of the infinite strikes. In his place they'll deploy sophomore Matt Wile, who was perfectly fine in about five games last year, averaging 42 yards a kick without incident. This year his numbers are seriously deflated because he's been deployed as a pooch punter exclusively. He won't match Hagerup's distance (who does?) but given that the punt coverage has given back all of that advantage already—70th in net punting—the absence won't be felt much.

The rest of Michigan's special teams is as per usual: excellent kicking, nonexistent punt return game featuring Jeremy Gallon making too many bad decisions, inability to block anyone on kickoffs. Denard may pop up on those latter items, though.

Key Matchup: Brendan Gibbons versus lack of hair. If he goes 0/3 in this game after giving up the Keith Stone look we'll all know why.

BONUS ACTUAL KEY MATCHUP: COVER THE GLABDANGED PUNTS ACE SANDERS IS CEREAL

Intangibles

tumblr_luq45dFmHF1r66x9vo1_400[1]

Cheap Thrills

Worry if...

  • Lewan cannot keep Clowney at bay.
  • Michigan's gameplan is on par with their Sugar Bowl plan.
  • Denard continues to line up at quarterback despite all eleven players moving to the LOS when he does.

Cackle with knowing glee if...

  • Devin + Denard == most of the offense.
  • Jake Ryan on the edge is death to the short stuff.
  • Devin's deep accuracy returns.

Fear/Paranoia Level: 8 (Baseline 5; +1 for CLOWNEY SMASH, +1 for Give Michigan A Month To Prepare And You Get… The Sugar Bowl Or Alabama Gameplan?, +1 for Shallow Secondary, –1 for Opponent Musical Chair At QB Too, –1 for No Lattimore And OL Issues, +1 for Kind Of Road Game, +1 for They S'posed To Be SEC)

Desperate need to win level: 4 (Baseline 5; +1 for Denard's Last Rodeo, +1 for Keep SEC Dominance Going, –1 for Inherently Meaningless Exhibition, –1 for In Half-Full Stadium, –1 for In Stupid Uniforms, –1 for That Has Essentially No Bearing On Anything, +1 for But I Am Going, –1 for Why Am I Going?, +1 for Oh Right Denard)

Loss will cause me to... execute searing self-examination about why I thought this would be a good idea at all.

Win will cause me to... high-five self for decision to go over and over.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

I don't really have much hope Borges can think his way out of the conundrum he faces tomorrow. The second half against Ohio State has drained most of my hope that Michigan was capable of integrating the two-QB system they're running in any but the literally most-predictable way possible. It was a bad flashback to DeBord days of yore. Maybe we'll get the Citrus Bowl "WHERE WAS THAT MY ENTIRE LIFE" bittersweet page-flip… but I'll have to see it to believe it after the last two years in which it seems like more time has meant worse preparation.

The offense will sputter; Denard will probably rip off a big play or two and Michigan will get to test those safeties more than they are used to with all the max-pro and Lewan hanging around; still hard to see M getting much above 20, and every handoff to a tailback is setting a down on fire.

South Carolina's offense isn't particularly talented but they have a coherent system of short passes and zone reads that keep them afloat when they are annihilating themselves like they did against Florida. I don't expect they'll be able to run much, and they'll bog down, too. Special teams and short fields figure to play a prominent role in a knock-down, drag-out slugfest. In that case, bet on the massive pass rush instead of the mediocre one.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:

  • Denard throws! It's incomplete.
  • Devin runs! On purpose! Once.
  • Neither team cracks 300 yards.
  • South Carolina, 20-16
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 31st, 2012 at 2:12 PM | If we can hold them to 20, I (Score:3 Normal)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4706

If we can hold them to 20, I think we'll win.  But I'm just not sold on our pass D, especially with Floyd out.  

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 2:25 PM | re: Ace Sanders: (Score:2)
BiSB
BiSB's picture
Joined: 08/15/2009
MGoPoints: 27921

/gulp

They no longer call me Bisbiño

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 2:28 PM | I'm not sold on Michigan (Score:5 Normal)
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 13967

I'm not sold on Michigan having an advantage anywhere in this game. South Carolina is 10-2 with losses to two teams with seriously vicious defenses. They've basically won comfortably against everyone else, except for the ugly win against Tennessee. On the other hand, Michigan hasn't really beaten a good team yet this season.

It's all John Navarre's fault.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 2:52 PM | We did come close to beating (Score:5 Normal)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4706

We did come close to beating two teams that are as good if not better than SCar, though (ND, Ohio).  We just haven't gotten over the hump.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 3:45 PM | I +1'd you because I want to believe it (Score:4 Normal)
bluetell
bluetell's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 4770

but unfortunately, 6 of the 8 quarters in those games were Borges' finest derp-fests. In the ND game and 2nd half of the Ohio game, the offense got all of 6 points to go with 9 turnovers. That is so derp-tastic. I have no faith Borges has any kind of gameplan for this game

Rudy watches inspirational movies about Shawn Hunwick

 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 3:53 PM | I agree about the Ohio second (Score:4 Normal)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4706

I agree about the Ohio second half, but I honestly didn't think the ND gameplan was that bad.  Denard had a brutal game.  You just can't expect your senior QB to throw four picks and lose a fumble.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 4:07 PM | Fair points, but you can't (Score:4 Normal)
Huma
Huma's picture
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 539

Fair points, but you can't put the turnovers on Borges. Bad play calling, yes -- poor execution, no.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 5:58 PM | I agree, we turned the ball (Score:2 Normal)
switch26
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2638

I agree, we turned the ball over way too much to completely blame it all on borges, but i still think his gameplan will get shit on tomorrow...

 

Hopefully they watched Denards freshman film when he never really threw and just took snaps and got tackled almost instantly...

 

Unless he can throw..  but  i doubt it.

 

Can't wait to watch us continually put him at QB and get just smashed at the LOS

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 9:24 PM | They barely beat Vanderbilt (Score:3 Normal)
SysMark
SysMark's picture
Joined: 11/15/2008
MGoPoints: 5566

They barely beat Vanderbilt 17-13...but yes they did beat Wofford 24-7.

Yeah they are good but let's not get carried away.

If we can get Denard, Gardner, or Gallon for that matter, behind their front four we will have an advantage.  Their ends come very hard and fast and the defense behind them is fair at best.  Not saying Borges will get it done but that's where Michigan can do damage.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 9:50 PM | Vanderbilt went 9-4 in the (Score:2 Normal)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7062

Vanderbilt went 9-4 in the SEC, and SC beat them in Nashville.

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 10:46 PM | That's a lot of conference (Score:3 Normal)
grumbler
Joined: 08/17/2011
MGoPoints: 132

That's a lot of conference games!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 11:44 PM | I was addressing the (Score:4 Normal)
SysMark
SysMark's picture
Joined: 11/15/2008
MGoPoints: 5566

I was addressing the proposition that all SC wins were "comfortable".  Thank you for the additional but unrelated information.

Pardon any hint of sarcasm. I've just had enough of the SC lovefest and I think we're going to beat them.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 1st, 2013 at 12:04 PM | Emotionally I agree, but rationally the SEC "lovefest" (Score:1)
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2928

is based on actiual fact. not media bias. The SEC is the best conference in college football, that's just true. Now, that doesn't mean we won't/can't win, not at all. I think the odds are 50/50 we win, but IMO the spread is about right for this game.

"Everyone gets dumped Gabe. Let me give you some advice: a little coverup on your Adams Apple will make it appear smaller. Which will make you appear less like a transvestite." 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 2:36 PM | Last preview of the year... (Score:1)
Wolverine Incognito
Wolverine Incognito's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: 1245

...so long 2012!

Homer? Who is Homer? My name is Wolverine Incognito.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 2:45 PM | The "Where" caught me for a second (Score:2)
jabberwock
jabberwock's picture
Joined: 07/04/2008
MGoPoints: 3549

nice.

Love & Hate are horns on the same goat.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 2:47 PM | Hello Gloom (Score:3 Normal)
BlueDragon
BlueDragon's picture
Joined: 11/14/2010
MGoPoints: 16726

"More time has meant worse preparation."

Yes, yes it has.

Abort, Retry, Fail?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 3:18 PM | Well. The sample size for (Score:5 Normal)
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1367

Well.

The sample size for this is n = 2 right? I presume no one is counting the drubbings of Purdue following byes the last two seasons because that was more time and a fine result.

Instead, we are gnashing our teeth over the Sugar Bowl when the best center in the country (and seeming lynch pin of the OL) hurt himself minutes before the game--and Michigan still won--and the season opener against Alabama--where the defense was run out the stadium in the first quarter.

I'd hardly say that data is conclusive.

Give it to Wheatley!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 5:14 PM | Still not getting the "bad preparation" for the Sugar Bowl. (Score:3 Normal)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38882

We scored twice as many Touchdowns as the opponent with an excellent defensive coordinator too. Our defense held them to that one touchdown with injured defensive lineman making their 3rd string kicker hit 4 of 5 FG. Sounds like a good game plan to me.

If we're only talking offense the only teams to score more on Bama than us was LSU in Death Valley (a whole 3 more points), the Heisman trophy winner, and a Georgia team that could be playing for a national championship. And none of them had Saban's D preparing for months. That preparation thing works both ways; not only one team gets the extra time. Some of them even have pretty good coaches.

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 8:51 PM | a little revisionist no? (Score:1)
jdon
jdon's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 601

I understand what you are saying, but that game was done and over before we scored...

jdon

 

We are the dead.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 9:02 PM | It was Alabama. (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38882

All of their games other than the 2 iImention were pretty much over pretty quick.

And on a site that did a whole front page post on how points matter no matter when you score them, even against Wisconsin in 2010 "after it was over"....

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
January 14th, 2013 at 2:40 AM | Drubbing Purdue isn't (Score:0 Redundant)
BlueDragon
BlueDragon's picture
Joined: 11/14/2010
MGoPoints: 16726

Drubbing Purdue isn't terribly difficult!

Abort, Retry, Fail?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 2:58 PM | Enjoy it (Score:1 Normal)
cjpops
cjpops's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 1708

I'm just going to focus on watching Denard play for The Team in one more game.  

Borges general futility and lack of imagination? Going to ignore that.

Norfleet on defense? I have a plan to convince myself that this is not real. It involves beer.

Win v. Loss? Not really that important to me.

 

Thanks to Brian and staff. Great content all season long. This site is the best. Much appreciated. Happy New Year, keep up the great work, and Go Blue!

"If you shoot me, you're liable to lose a lot of those humanitarian awards."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 3:04 PM | Ok that highlight with (Score:2)
jabberwock
jabberwock's picture
Joined: 07/04/2008
MGoPoints: 3549

#1 trying to unsuccessfully strip the ball from Sanders, then getting trampled by approximately  17 other players is downright hilarious.

Love & Hate are horns on the same goat.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 3:19 PM | It's amazing to watch how (Score:2)
RationalBuckeye
Joined: 04/06/2012
MGoPoints: 388

It's amazing to watch how Clowney consistently gets his outside shoulder free around the end, and then hooks his arm over the DE's, so that holding him is the only hope of stopping him. He's a bad man with angry, angry hands.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 4:27 PM | For the most part I agree (Score:2 Normal)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2908

For the most part I agree with the NFL's policy of making guys wait until they have been out of HS for 3 years before entering the NFL draft, but Clowney is one of those guys who probably could have been an impact player in the NFL right out of HS. Absolute freak of nature.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:27 PM | lol, no way. He was strong (Score:1 Normal)
david from wyoming
david from wyoming's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 2814

lol, no way. He was strong right out of high school, but no way he was NFL strong. He would just get pushed around, no matter how fast and athletic he is.

Are you a park ranger at Yellowstone? Say hi to Yogi Bear for me. - the_big_house 500th

I may not be a 70 year old man. - Herm

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 3:26 PM | MOAR I FORM WITH VINNIE (Score:3 Normal)
El Jeffe
El Jeffe's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 6714

MOAR I FORM WITH VINNIE SMITH!!!!!

...

I MEAN, LESS I FORM WITH VINNIE SMITH!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 4:14 PM | iPhone (Score:1)
Ty Butterfield
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 892

Can't stand to see Vincent Smith running up the middle on 3rd and three for no gain. Hopefully Michigan keeps it relatively close and doesn't get embarrassed on national TV again.

"But in the tire fire that was last year's secondary he showed a little spark." - Brian Cook

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:02 PM | neither can I.. If we are (Score:1)
switch26
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2638

neither can I.. If we are going to give it to Smith at least we could insert Norfleet here and at least give someone with a juking ability and speed to try to make something happen..  V. Smith just doesn't work, except on the throw back screen

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 4:28 PM | I wonder what else you get on (Score:3 Normal)
trueblueintexas
trueblueintexas's picture
Joined: 11/10/2008
MGoPoints: 1264

I wonder what else you get on Google Images when you type in "kitten in a chicken outfit"?

"Anyone who isn't confused, really doesn't understand the situation." - Edward R. Murrow

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:30 PM | You'd be surprised (Score:2 Funny)
Michigasling
Michigasling's picture
Joined: 11/21/2009
MGoPoints: 3280

Or maybe not.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 4:46 PM | #1 positive aspect ... (Score:1)
Indiana Blue
Indiana Blue's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 1521

We are playing an SEC team in a bowl game (ok - forget Tennessee).  Chance for a little redemption against probably the 5th best team in the SEC behind Alabama, Georgia, LSU and Florida.  

Our last taste of football for 8 months !

Go Blue! 

No place on earth I'd rather be on a football Saturday than Michigan Stadium !

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 5:06 PM | 31-13 (Score:3 Normal)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19224

South Carolina if Ohio State Borges is in attendance.

26-24 Michigan if Iowa Borges decides to show up.


  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:07 PM | Don: "South Carolina if Ohio (Score:4 Normal)
DonAZ
DonAZ's picture
Joined: 12/05/2011
MGoPoints: 665

Don: "South Carolina if Ohio State Borges is in attendance."

Brian: "The second half against Ohio State has drained most of my hope that Michigan was capable of integrating the two-QB system their running in any but the literally most-predictable way possible."

Me: For the life of me I don't understand why Gardner at QB and Robinson somewhere else should be a problem for Borges.  Robinson in space with the ball is the most dangerous player in America.  So get him the ball in space and let him do his thing.  I'm no OC, but I don't see a reason why that is fundamentally impossible. 

So ...

  • If Gardner is QB, and
  • Offensive line gives Gardner at least some time, and
  • Robinson is playing WR, slot, RB ... rinse, repeat, and
  • Gallon, Dileo and Roundtree show up ... then
  • SC has a few things to worry about

If, however, "Ohio State Borges" shows up ... then it's going to be a bad day.

Midwestern born and raised ... now living in the heat of the Arizona desert

  • Login or register to post comments
January 1st, 2013 at 8:52 AM | If I could, I'd hire you as (Score:1)
OmarDontScare
OmarDontScare's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1496

If I could, I'd hire you as OC

I got the shotgun. You got the briefcase. It's all in the game though, right?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:58 PM | Might want to add specificity (Score:4 Normal)
Sopwith
Sopwith's picture
Joined: 06/29/2010
MGoPoints: 1625

and say that we're looking for 2012 Iowa Borges, not 2011 Iowa Borges.  Because 2012>>>>2011.  What a fiasco that was.

"You know, for a bartender/bookie, you're pretty judgmental."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 5:15 PM | I agree.  I don't see us (Score:1)
Bobby Boucher
Bobby Boucher's picture
Joined: 05/02/2009
MGoPoints: 668

I agree.  I don't see us pulling this one out.  Al Borges + Prep Time = Fat Chance.  I like the guy and all, but he's just too predictable.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:17 PM | Think this is a bit more than (Score:2 Normal)
aiglick
Joined: 11/27/2010
MGoPoints: 1445

Think this is a bit more than meaningless exhibition game. This is a Top 10 opponent that is a member of the top conference.

Win here could be big for the future in terms of momentum for next year (the schedule should be much easier than this year's). Huge for seniors also.

It is not a BCS bowl but do think a win here makes this season look a lot better and continues the momentum from last season.

Here's hoping for a bright future. This team does try hard and I will continue to support them.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:20 PM | you forgot the biggest (Score:1)
Clown Sauce
Clown Sauce's picture
Joined: 07/12/2011
MGoPoints: 834

you forgot the biggest matchup of all

Al Borges of ND and 2nd half OSU Vs. Al Borges of Iowa

"What" ain't no country I ever heard of. They speak English in What?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:22 PM | I think Al Borges of OSU is a (Score:3 Normal)
BraveWolverine730
BraveWolverine730's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2744

I think Al Borges of OSU is a better one. His ND gameplan didn't include a ton of high risk passes IMO. Denard just didn't execute. Absolutely no excuse for his OSU gameplan.

" I want to win Big 10 titles. Multiply. Consecutively. I just made that word up (multiply). I'm like that. I'm good at Scrabble."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:53 PM | Time (Score:1)
borninAnnArbor
borninAnnArbor's picture
Joined: 10/10/2012
MGoPoints: 167

Keep in mind that time to come up with a good gameplan is also the same time the SC defensive coordinator to read figure out all of Michigan's tells. If reading this blog can help me call out plays before they happen, then Michigan is going to have to out execute.

I think this gane will be close and will swing on a deep turnover.

Ann Arbor by birth.  Wolverine by choice.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 6:20 PM | I can't believe I'm the first (Score:4 Normal)
BraveWolverine730
BraveWolverine730's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2744

I can't believe I'm the first one to comment on the score.  Brian must be quite pessimistic if he's not even bothering to try a weird score prediction.

" I want to win Big 10 titles. Multiply. Consecutively. I just made that word up (multiply). I'm like that. I'm good at Scrabble."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 8:53 PM | I want to be optimistic but... (Score:2 Normal)
MGoStrength
MGoStrength's picture
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 586

I want to be optimistic, but their only losses are to Florida and LSU and they beat Georgia and Clemson.  The only teams to hold South Carolina under 21 points was Vanderbilt in their first game of the year and Florida who may have the best defense in the country.  If they scored 23 on LSU and 35 on Georgia, I see them scoring in the mid-to-high 30's on us.  I think their reciever's speed will give our linebackers and secondary trouble, they will break a punt or kick off big, and on the other side of the ball their pass rush will be hard to handle.  I think for us to keep this game competitive Devin has to be very accurate and mix in quite a bit of runs to keep them off balance & obviously we have to find a way to get Denard involved.  It just doesn't seem likely all that will happen.  I see more like a 35-13 ish outcome unfortunately.  I hope to be presently surprised that Devin looks great and is able to use his feet to avoid pressure and completes a high percentage, Denard is effective & is on the field most snaps, Hayes gets some carries and shows some flashes, Devin to Devin happens and they have no anwser for him, Lewan announces he is staying another year, we see Richardson and he's really fast, Norfleet finally breaks one, and Jake Ryan is all over the place.

Strength equipment is expensive and guarantees you nothing.  A strong will is free and can give you everything you want.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 10:39 PM | LSU (Score:1)
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1948

I think they were beating LSU heading into the 4th quarter and then just collapsed.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 11:14 PM | SEC is WAAAYYYY overrated this year (Score:4 Normal)
dragonchild
Joined: 10/13/2011
MGoPoints: 356

Alabama is legit, and the SEC lost to almost no one outside their conference.  But consider who they played (good teams in bold):

S. Carolina:  E. Carolina, UAB, Wofford, Clemson

Florida:  Bowling Green, LA-Lafayette, Jacksonville St., Florida State

Georgia:  Buffalo, Florida Atl, Georgia Southern, Georgia Tech

LSU:  N. Texas, Washington, Idaho, Towson

Miss. St.*:  Jackson St., Troy, S. Alabama, Mid. Tennessee

So. . . yeah.  Real vicious gauntlets there, #7 Georgia and #8 LSU.  WTF??  So all we have to go on to gauge half the Top Ten teams in the country* is how they beat each other up.  That's how Mississippi State wound up being like #11 for a week.  I understand being spooked because the SEC has been the strongest conference for a while now AND Michigan got spanked by Alabama, but as a whole, the SEC this year does not look nearly as scary as they have the past few.  Florida obviously brought their A-game against rival FSU but this is the same school that needed a fourth-quarter comeback to beat LA-Lafayette.  Now granted ND almost laid an egg against Pitt, but we played ND and almost took 'em.  Tomorrow after all the bowls are played my assessment might wind up looking very silly, but to clarify my point, I'm not saying the SEC is bad (please understand this, "overrated" does NOT necessarily mean "bad"). . . I'm just saying we just have relatively little evidence they're good, either.  For the most part, I haven't seen them DO anything -- or at least when they do, they've looked as vulnerable as any other major conference.  Hell, Auburn and Arkansas are typically competitive and neither were even bowl eligible this season.

Incidentally S. Carolina has one of the SEC's most impressive wins this season by beating Clemson, which doesn't look good for Michigan, but I'd rather beat good teams than hide from them.  It's a bowl game FFS; would you be more excited if we played a Sun Belt team?  I'm more worried about Borges than S. Carolina.  Use Denard as a tailback and Michigan has the talent to stay with them.  My biggest fear is that Borges won't.

*Including Miss. State because it's ridiculous how far they got up the rankings by riding "SEC BABY!" coattails playing the above joke of an OOC schedule.  Never forget.
  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 11:46 PM | Most top teams don't play (Score:3 Normal)
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 13967

Most top teams don't play anyone out of conference. Fact is that Alabama has won two out of three titles and is about to win three of four. If they would have lost last year, LSU would be defending champs. If they had lost again this year, Notre Dame would be overmatched by a different SEC team (Florida). The SEC is going to win at least five of seven games this bowl season on top of another national title.

Regardless of your thoughts about the SEC and why they win so much, they definitely have earned the presumption of excellence until they start losing some big games.

It's all John Navarre's fault.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
January 1st, 2013 at 12:29 PM | Yeah. . . (Score:2 Normal)
dragonchild
Joined: 10/13/2011
MGoPoints: 356

Incidentally, the two teams in the title game both played some school we've all heard of.  They wear blue and yellow, or something.  I don't think they're a cupcake, though.

And Clemson beat LSU.  There's still plenty of time to prove me wrong, but again, my point isn't necessarily that the SEC is weak.  I just think giving teams or conferences the benefit of the doubt is the furthest thing from analysis.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 1st, 2013 at 7:30 PM | Yeah, and we probably should (Score:2)
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 13967

Yeah, and we probably should have won one of those games and I might as well have been playing in the other one. Alabama is pretty clearly in a different league than Notre Dame is, having seen both teams play.

College football's very design makes real, in-depth analysis tricky at best. Each team plays about 10% of the other teams, there is very high roster turnover, really small sample sizes, and there are very few high-quality intersectional matchups to allow anyone to approach solid comparisons about teams that aren't in the same conference. Regular and advanced stats comparisons try to do this, but those analyses are limited by the same problems I listed above.

The Big 10 lost two of three against the SEC today and probably the biggest surprise is that the SEC didn't win all three. The gap looks narrower today than it has in years past, but someone has to knock them down before you can realistically not give the SEC the benefit of the doubt.

It's all John Navarre's fault.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
January 1st, 2013 at 1:30 PM | The SEC is going to win five (Score:2)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4706

The SEC is going to win five of seven bowl games?  We'll see.  They've lost one already and Miss State is off to a bad start.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 31st, 2012 at 11:22 PM | "Half-full stadium?" (Score:2 Normal)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10385

The game is close enough to selling out that I decided to buy a ticket instead of finding one on the street.  There aren't a lot available, especially on the Michigan side of the field.  This will be one of the fuller stadiums for a non-major bowl.  

I'm a bit surprised that South Caroilina isn't going to "travel" better this year.  They are half as far away as Michigan and they are favored to win the game.  It's quite impressive that more tickets are gone on the Michigan side of the field than the SC side.  They really should have invaded and made this game a sellout.

I'm glad they didn't, though.  It won't seem like a road game this time around.

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.