Is "CornShuckers" somehow a derogatory version of Cornhuskers?
spoiler alert: i linked this
|WHAT||Michigan vs Nebraska|
8:00 PM EST
October 27th, 2012
|THE LINE||Nebraska -2|
|WEATHER||cloudy, dry, around 40|
Is that corn in your pocket or… oh, I see. It's corn.
COME TO NEBRASHHHHKA STATTE
Last week Michigan kept its head above water against an excellent run defense on the strength of two big gains. One of them came when MSU's crappy defensive tackle got creased on a run blitz. The other was a quarterback draw late when Michigan State backed off, uncharacteristically, and paid for it. With those two runs, Michigan crested 5 YPC against a top ten—maybe top five—defense. Without them, they barely exceeded 3 YPC.
Is that good? Bad? Ah hell I don't know. Denard is Denard and will rip off big gains if you keep feeding him the ball, and Toussaint's big run is the kind of thing that happens to super aggressive defenses when they get creased (and a walk-on WR gets his block on). In the end, 5 YPC is fair. Nard gonna Nard.
The good news is that Nebraska's defense is emphatically not Michigan State's.
Except when it is sometimes I guess? Nebraska blew it badly on one 80-yard Venric Mark touchdown. Other than that, Northwestern muddled along at about the same rate Wisconsin did. In half of Nebraska's games against BCS competition, they're Michigan State. In half, they're roadkill.
If there's a pattern you can draw from four games, it's spread 'n' shreds leaving tread marks all over the Cornhusker D. UCLA QB Brett Hundley is a run threat (9 carries for 66 yards) and opened Jonathan Franklin up for a 216-yard blitz. Braxton Miller almost cracked 200 himself and opened it up for Carlos Hyde to hit 140. Though not included in the table above, even winless Southern Miss saw quarterback Anthony Alford hit 84 yards on 15 carries… before getting pulled because he was also 1 of 5 for six yards. The Eagles hit 4.6 YPC on the day.
In a bizarre move, Northwestern all but abandoned the Kain Colter running game in favor of having Trevor Sieman throw 35 times, so they fit more in the Wisconsin mold than UCLA/OSU:
Nebraska made it very clear that they'd sit back in man free all game, and the Wildcats tried to beat them over the top time and again even though the Husker corners were locking down the Northwestern wideouts and quarterback Trevor Siemian lacked accuracy on his deep ball. The Wildcats threw 37 times and ran 38 times despite (1) playing against an awful run defense, and (2) holding a lead for most of the game.
WTFitz. Nebraska did hold Colter down on his few carries, FWIW.
Will Nebraska be able to do the same to Denard? Well… I'm doubtful. Ace saw Nebraska blitz twice in the first half and lay back in a bend-but-don't-break shell, likely because the shell-shocked Huskers were going back to basics after the OSU debacle. Nebraska's safeties, like Michigan State's, are active hitters in the run game, though, so if they're lining up nine yards off the LOS and coming down hard in an effort to replicate MSU's gameplan, trouble may ensue.
Emphasis on "may"—MSU's aggressiveness was effective instead of disastrous because Denicos Allen and Max Bullough are fast as hell and the MSU safeties are pretty good, as well. Nebraska only avoided a couple of long Denard Robinson touchdowns last year because Lavonte David played the same role as the MSU linebackers did last week: guy who makes shoestring tackle just as you're standing up to yell "GOOOOOOOOO." Lavonte David's not around anymore, and the Nebraska LB corps misses his athleticism. They're not bad—except when they are of course—but if a gap gets vacated or the sideline is tested they are less likely to be able to mitigate that damage with a super fast tackling machine. Stafford is a boom or bust SS, too, and could at any time wander off in the wrong direction as Denard screams upfield.
Key Matchup: Denard's ankles versus opponent's outstretched arms. There are going to be two or three moments in the game where Denard is setting sail for the endzone. Where you at, Will Compton? Are you Lavonte David walking through that door?
[Hit THE JUMP for WHAT THEY CAN SCORE THAT AIN'T RAIGHT]
This has been a strength for the Huskers, but like Michigan's defense that strength has gone virtually untested. Nebraska's three Big Ten opponents to date are 107th, 101st, and 110th in passing yardage. Wisconsin and OSU are around 50th in efficiency, Northwestern is 99th. UCLA's doing pretty well for themselves but Brett Hundley went for 305 yards on 33 attempts with 4 TDs and 0 INTs, so a large part of the reason they are high up the passing efficiency charts is smoking Nebraska.
The little-used passing offenses of Wisconsin and Ohio State averaged a collective 8.7 YPA with two TDs and no INTs, so the only BCS opponent they've held down is Northwestern's extremely terrible passing offense.
Unfortunately, Michigan's got one of those too. The Nebraska passing defense is set to go untested again. The only thing keeping Michigan's YPA afloat the past few weeks is a 71-yard throwback screen against Illinois. Before Michigan hit Big Ten play there was of course Interception Armageddon against the Irish, and whatever happened against Alabama.
You would expect that Nebraska will be able to replicate what Michigan State's corners were able to do to Michigan's outside receivers, which is play them aggressively and virtually remove them from the game. Then you're left with Michigan hitting slot guys like The Threat and Jeremy Gallon. The problem with that is that Nebraska will be looking for that business; this may be the week to actually run some speed outs and force those linebackers to run with the little darty guys.
If Nebraska isn't playing hyper-aggressive and Michigan's ground game is going at a better clip, Denard's passes should descend from the 29 he threw against MSU to the 15-20 range Michigan prefers after Interception Armageddon. Hopefully the ones that aren't on third and long will be built to exploit Nebraska's run defense, but at this point I'm skeptical.
FWIW, Nebraska's impressive sack rate (over three a game, eight nationally) is built on the schedule. The last two weeks they've had three sacks for a total of ten yards and Ace specifically noted how the Northwestern offensive line held the Nebraska DL at bay:
I wasn't very impressed with Nebraska's front seven, which couldn't generate a pass rush all game. Compton had a relatively quiet day, and the most active players against the run were safeties P.J. Smith and Daimion Stafford, both of whom tackled well and played very aggressively. Three-tech Baker Steinkuhler is an above-average lineman; strongside end Cameron Meredith is solid but undersized, and the rest of the line didn't do a whole lot. I'm honestly not sure how this team is eighth in the country in sacks, except that the secondary is stellar in man coverage.
If the Huskers aren't blitzing, Denard should be able to set his feet and fire. To guys wearing defensive backs like capes.
Key Matchup: Denard versus huge interception death. As always.
The same cast of characters that Michigan faced last year returns with the possible (probable?) exception of Rex Burkhead, who's been battling a strained ACL for much of the year and strained it again last week.
While Burkhead brings gritty grit grit and certain wildcat QB aspects to the Nebraska offense, if the season to date is representative there is no or negative falloff to primary backup Ameer Abdullah. What Abdullah lacks in tackle-crunching power and ability to take a pitch and also pitch it…
…he makes up for by being damn fast. He's averaging almost 5.9 YPC and has kept that output above five even when only Big Ten opponents are considered. Martinez remains Martinez, an extremely fast north-south runner with not much wiggle but plenty of zoom.
As a result, Burkhead's injury status has had little effect on Nebraska's rushing output:
Wow. I know you're thinking "loldefenses," but Wisconsin is good; OSU and Northwestern are 29th and 30th in rush defense, giving up around 3.7 yards between them. Nebraska took those defenses to the woodshed. UCLA, too, has been okay. There is no way to look at NU's numbers and not be impressed.
So this will be a test. Nebraska offensive coordinator Tim Beck is a mad tinkerer who loves folding in weird wrinkles—earlier this year several goal-line plays saw Martinez motion out so Burkhead could take the snap, pitch back to Abdullah, and then lead block after a pitch(!). He's got at least two playmakers, and they're dedicated to this offense. The results are obvious, and will only get more so once we hit the next section.
But wait, there's more!
Aw shiii, that's the flexbone last year and you know Tim Beck has seen that Air Force tape. If NU comes out on this they'll be testing to see what Mattison is doing in response. If the answer is still "making Jordan Kovacs be both the deep middle and pitch defender," fireworks will happen. Bad ones. Probably not, though. Mattison uber alles.
This will be Michigan's biggest test since Alabama, and is a make-or-break game for the proposition that Michigan's defense is elite, Dallas notwithstanding.
Key Matchup: Mattison vs Beck, option style. A fascinating article came out this week from the Nebraska side of things detailing how Mattison shut down the Huskers last year…
Nebraska had wanted to run outside zone reads and a good dose of option football around the strength of the Wolverines’ interior defensive line. Mattison countered by placing his ends outside the offensive tackles and angling them toward the backfield. Quarterback Taylor Martinez sometimes had to run around those ends, which bought UM’s faster linebackers and safeties more time to make the tackle.
…he'll be looking for any schematic deficiencies he can find in that Air Force tape, of which there were lots, and anticipating counter moves and folding in stuff that he hopes will gameplan Nebraska big chunks of yards. That's probably how it's going to have to go down since without Burkhead the guys running the ball are great once they've got a lane but not liable to run over or juke the pants off some guy.
NUMBER ONE BAYBEE
Look, man, that youtube video about Taylor Martinez's passing motion is funny. But I'm not posting it—at least not embedding it—until such time as Nebraska isn't leading the league in passer efficiency by a whopping 25 points. The gap between Taylor Martinez's wonky passing motion and #2 Ohio State is equivalent to the gap between #2 Ohio State and #11 Michigan State.
/several more mindblown dot gifs
/huge fornicating pile of mindblown dot gifs all rubbin on each other ohhh grosssss
Nebraska is 15th nationally in passer efficiency; no other Big Ten team is in the top 50. Gobble gobble gobble.
Nebraska's fervent desire to run the ball helps, with just 190 passes to 328 runs. So too does a wide receiver corps that suddenly seems like it may be the Big Ten's best unless that honor goes to the Penn State WR/TE corps.
/ALL THE MINDBLOWN GIFS
Martinez still throws a weird looping ball that takes forever to get where it's going, even on WR screens, so Michigan should be more afraid of the deep stuff, where the looping is an asset, instead of the short stuff, which they've blown up all year anyway. Like a team going up against Michigan's offense, the biggest threat is a safety-committing run fake that leads to a guy getting loose over the top. Ask Thomas Gordon about that—Nebraska's 54-yard touchdown in last year's game was tough for him.
Michigan's pass efficiency defense is even better than Nebraska's—15th—against an even worse slate of opponents. Since Alabama barely had to throw, you're looking down the pipe at Notre Dame, Purdue, Illinois, and Michigan State as M opponents. They haven't been tested; they can't really get to the QB; they may be playing it relatively safe since Martinez can tear you up if you screw up a lane. There's going to be a lot of watching passes loop towards their targets; hopefully the incredibly tight secondary coverage Michigan has displayed all year remains in effect.
Key Matchup: This section of the preview versus your ability to perceive the world as a logical place where effects follow from causes.
Nebraska is 116th in FEI special teams efficacy this year, which whoah. The major reason: punt returns. The NCAA lists them 20th in average yards per attempt; FEI sees the muff avalanche and is like no sale. Also bad: punting (112th) and kickoffs (97th). Michigan should have a tangible advantage in the field position battle.
Brett Maher is a pretty good kicker; Michigan's got a reliable short yardage guy and Matt Wile just booted a 48-yarder. Probably a push here as well.
Key Matchup: COVER THE PUNTS FERGODSAKES
OH MY GOD THIS IS ALSO NOT A CAT.
So, Nebraska is 110th in turnover margin despite not throwing the ball much. In last year's edition of this game the Cornhuskers shot themselves in the foot, leg, pelvis, chest, and finally face en route to a 45-17 defeat. Last week against Northwestern they nearly did the same and eked out a one point win despite outgaining the opponent by 200 yards.
It's to the point where "Nebraska beats themselves" is a real thing and not inane color commentator keys to the game hokum. Actually, it is both of those things. But still… given past histories if there's a team that throws two pick-sixes and manages to lose a fumble when it clonks off the back of the returner's helmet somehow, it'll be the Cornhuskers.
Also a cat:
Cackle with knowing glee if...
Fear/Paranoia Level: 7 (Baseline 5; +1 for I Wonder What Happened The Last Time Michigan Had A Night Road Game, +1 for Oh Now I Remember, +1 for Could You Get Me Some Bleach To Drink, Honey?, –1 for Nebraska Is A YOU SHALL PASS Defense For Mobile QBs, –1 for Also Nebraska Tends To Dissolve In A Heap Of Their Own Body Parts Not Infrequently, –1 for Mattison Must Break You, +1 for It's Almost Like You Can Construct An Offense Around A Mobile QB That Makes Sense, +1 for Taylor Martinez Passing Efficiency Mayans Explosion)
Desperate need to win level: 10 (Baseline 5; +1 for WIN THIS DAMN CONFERENCE, +1 for GO TO THE DAMN ROSE BOWL, +1 for GUARANTEE YOU ARE IN THE DAMN CHAMPIONSHIP GAME, +1 for ROSE BOWL, +1 for Hi Nebraska Welcome To Our Conference SURPRISE THROAT SLASH)
Loss will cause me to... never eat corn again! OH GOD IT'S IN EVERYTHING. /omnivoresdilemma'd
Win will cause me to... spend rest of regular season scouting Wisconsin.
The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:
For a game eight weeks into the season this is quite the mystery. Michigan's defense goes up against an offense that will test it seriously for the first time since Alabama ran them over in the opener, or I guess Air Force took them to the limit thanks to their flexbone.
I lean towards the defense proving they're for real. I've seen them do many things against many opponents and ever since Mattison got those DTs absorbing doubles and robbing opponents of linebacker blocking angles it's been smooth sailing for M. Nebraska should hit some stuff here and there when guys get pulled out of position; I'm banking on Nebraska coming out of this game with a considerably less shiny YPC than they've achieved so far. That doesn't mean another 13 point outing is coming—this team is on another level from the offenses Michigan has shut down so far.
Unfortunately, on the other side of the ball it seems doubtful Michigan is going to be able to replicate the UCLA/OSU torchings. Running backs played big parts in both of those outings, and Michigan hasn't been able to get those guys going for whatever reason. Borges and Hoke are now terrified of their quarterback, perhaps with justification, but it seems like the last three weeks were spent spackling over holes instead of adding anything genuinely new.
Michigan's WRs are finally revealing themselves to be towards the bottom of reasonable expectations and Nebraska's DBs are high quality; it's going to be a battle to make those linebackers vacate gaps with plays to the sidelines, plays over their heads, and etc. Haven't seen Michigan do that consistently yet.
Michigan will bust some long stuff, yeah, but enough? In the end, Nebraska's ability to grind up whoever they face game in, game out—even good defenses—is the best thing either team has going for it.
Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:
Is "CornShuckers" somehow a derogatory version of Cornhuskers?
Michigan's offense has stalled against Alabama, ND, and MSU. Nebraska's defense is not in the league of those defenses, and Nebraska's offense and special teams often put its D in bad positions. The Huskers will certainly have an advantage playing at home at night, but this Michigan team seems pretty battle-tested to me after the Bama, ND, and MSU games.
A now 0-7 So Miss tagged them for 20, Wiscy for 27, Northwestern for 29, UCLA for 36, Ohio for 63. Michigan will score points on their no-defense, Nebraska won't on our super-awesome-ness defense, and their special teams will continue to cough up turnovers (plural). 45-17 again.
That would be amazing. I want to watch that game.
I think our offense can do at least 80% of what UCLA and OSU did.
Michigan wins 31-21.
ALWAYS PITCH IT TO BREASTON
If this game ends with Mike Kwiatkowski running down the sideline and not pitching it to a trailing Gallon, I'm going to be mega-pissed off you guys.
Kwiatowski does have to pitch it to Gallon. The Funchess will just jump over everyone and land in the endzone. That is the only way you can get out of pitching it to Breaston. I mean Norfleet. I mean Gallon. But really Denard is the fastest though.
Denard will be in on that kickoff return but will inevitably be in the endzone already because he can't sit around and wait for everyone else. Just watch him on the plays where he hands off - he's several yards ahead of the running back when all is said and done!
Our gets more impressive each week.
i'd like a D there; and can we buy an O?
It's like a choose-your-own-adventure prediction.
I'm still pissed we had to share the national title that year w/Scott Frost and Co. They wouldn't even have been undefeated if not for the infamous "Flea Kicker" play that saved them from a loss against Missouri, and they finished #1 in the coaches' poll partly as a gift to the retiring Tom Osborne, no doubt.
So I hope we crush them, but given night road game, etc., I expect this to be close. Hope we can squeak this one out.
I think this game is super even. I see both teams around 400 yards of Total Offense. I am tempted to give the edge to the home team, especially Nebraska who is like 30-40 points better at home. If it comes down to Turnovers and Special Teams, Nebraska is one of the worst in the country at both of those. I'll say 31-24 Michigan with a Norfleet KO return for a TD.
Fuck that, we're gonna cruch 'em.
WiL. I'm with you. I came here thinking I was going to see something like 28-24 M. Come on, Brian. You're killing the optimism here. We're going to score 30 plus. Let's Go Blue.
Special Teams Key Matchup: Brady Hoke vs Heiko Spread Punt Formation Presser Questions
Michigan hasn't really surprised me in a game yet this year. Last week I was concerned that the running game that had been inches away from getting RPS'd against weaker opponents was finally going to get RPS'd by a strong opponent. Nebraska is no MSU.
That said, this is one of the best offenses we've faced. Our secondary will be tested, and will fail a few times. They will break a few big runs. They will score points on our very good defense. In fact, I think they'll score in the mid-upper 20's.
Michigan has a very good rushing attack, and Nebraska won't be as successful as MSU. Particularly if they try to replicate the MSU defense, since the 'Huskers simply don't have the personnel to pull that off and those blitzes will get torched. Sure, they'll get a few TFLs that kill drives, but we'll have 3 or 4 long runs too. I think this means we're in the mid-upper 20's as well.
This game is going to come down to who makes the mistakes. If Martinez throws a couple of picks and we recover a fumble (or muffed punt) we'll win. If Denard fires off an INT or 3, we'll lose.
I don't feel great about this one, but I love my Wolverines. So I'll predict we win 28-27. Or that they'll win, 30-24. Whichever.
When is the last time we won a game that the MGoPreview picked us to lose?
I don't quite see why you're so down on our offense all of the sudden. MSU shut us down, but did anybody really not see that coming? Outside of that we've played a lot of bad defenses (especially bad rushing defenses) and torched them. We may have played conservative, but we scored practically whenever we wanted. Nebraska's defense is terrible, especially against the run, and especially again mobile quarterbacks. But now you think they will shut us down by doing what, emulating MSU's defense? If that was easy more teams would do it. I'm a tiny bit worried about their offense, but I honestly can't see us putting up less that 30.
35-24 would be my best guess.
Our defense is probably the best in the Big Ten right now. We gave up 25 to a gimmick our second game of the season, and 41 to Ala-fucking-bama. Since then? We've given up no more than 13 points in any game, including that certain night game at ND, where ND's desperate need to win level was a definitive ten.
So, can we please be serious for a second? ND > Nebraska. I'll give you that Nebraska runs something closer to Air Force and their 25 points of offense than anything we've seen since. I don't care, Martinez will be bottled up. Nebraska doesn't cut block like Air Force does. Nebraska is not Air Force. We've improved astronomically since Air Force, and every game thereafter. We can game-plan effectively for Nebraska, and I'm beyond confident that G. Mattison will have done that in spades. Our defense only gets better; it's a trend at this point.
Why do you foresee a giant step backward? FEI? I agree with the commenter who posed the question: why do you mock FEI when it's good for us, and preach it when it's bad? If predictions can mean anything objective, I'll grant that Nebraska's option offense should work to a degree, but our LBs and DEs will ALSO BE ALL OVER THAT SHIT. How scared are we supposed to be of the BIG PLAY, when the BIG PLAY is all Nebraska has going for it?
Parse any Mattison interview since day one, and he preaches constantly about keeping the ball in front and between the hashes. If he does one thing, it's to create defenses that don't give up the big play.
Michigan 27-23 in a game that's really not as close as the score. Just as likely, Blue wins 27-16.
dont agree with prediction. I am not impressed at all with Nebraska defense at all and they havent played a defense like us this year. We give up a couple big plays for TDs but Denard and Fitz have a good day tomorrow.
31 - 24
I agree. Sure, MSU held us to 12 points, but that was a few plays away from being about twice that. Even so, MSU has a very good defense.
The two games before that, we scored a combined 89 points. Granted, 7 of those were on a defensive TD, but more than that was from second stringers with the game out of hand (Rawls had 123 yards and 2 TDs) and one whole game was in a rain storm.
Illinois' D is bad, but Purdue's is certainly not. Nebraska's is in between the two, maybe closer to Illinois, even. Do I think we'll score 45? Probably not, but I bet we top 30.
Denard returns atleast 1 KO to the house, and Gardner throws for a TD .......... Book it!
"Loss will cause me to... never eat corn again! OH GOD IT'S IN EVERYTHING. /omnivoresdilemma'd"
Brian Cook FTW...
does "never eat corn" include high fructose corn syrup? If so, Brian's close to hunger strike territory.
That is most definitely the joke.
Michigan has had two really bad defensive games. But they were merely Jim Hermann bad. They weren't Gerg/Gibson bad, like Nebraska's two bad defensive games. Those were abominations. They gave up over 700 rushing yards total to OSU and Yookla, for Christ's sake. We gave up a bunch to a triple option team that runs for 350 yards a game, and we got battered around by an NFL team. Yes, the Air Force and Alabama games sucked, but Nebraska's games against the Powder Blues and the Buckeyes were worse. Is OSU's offense a lot better than ours? If so, then why did they only have 100 yards at halftime against Purdue? Why did they score 29 against UAB?
I like how we match up in this game a lot. Our offense has been their kryptonite this year. Something about Nebraska doesn't pass the eyeball test with me. They don't look tough or disciplined. Their offense disappeared for most of the second half against OSU and UCLA, and it couldn't get out of its own way against Northwestern. Sometimes, their offensive line gets completely blown up or totally screws up a play in Yakety-sax like fashion. e.g they bungled a 4th and 1 against Northwestern when a pulling lineman collided with a tight end because somebody ran the wrong way. Earlier, a player got into a shouting match with Bo Pelini on the sidelines ala Carson Butler. Speaking of Northwestern, when did holding their offense to 28 points become some kind of accomplishment? That offense sucks. I guess my point is -- if Michigan doesn't deserve much credit for total mutilations of Illinois, ND, MSU, and Purdue, Nebraska doesn't deserve credit for merely good performances against teams like Southern Miss and Northwestern.
I dunno. I'm having a hard time putting a lid on my expectations. For some reason, I feel really confident about this game. Like, borderline blowout confident. The only thing that I'm afraid of is that I my teams tend to get smacked down just when my confidence is highest. When I deviate from everyone else's expectations on the good side, I am almost always wrong.
The last two weeks they've [only] had three sacks for a total of ten yards
To be fair, Nebraska had a bye before Northwestern. In their last two actual games, they've had five sacks: 3 against Northwestern, 2 against Ohio State.
Michigan 29 - 11
Big 12 doesn't play defense guys. Attention to details
The last two years, we've played somewhere between inconsistent and awful in all of our road/neutral site games outside of Purdue. I hope they prove me wrong.
I don't think you're that off base. It's been shown, generally speaking, Lincoln is a hard place to play. Everyone picked us to lose 3 or 4 games. Now, that's not to say I can't see us winning this game. Just saying a prediction of the Children of the Corn isn't insane, because it's what a game for the chance to play in for the Big Ten Championship should be - a really good game.
Have to wait for one more week for what in theory should be a relaxing weekend.
this game can easily go several ways. i could absolutely see a michigan blowout, but i think a close game is more likely. both teams know what's on the line. michigan, in my opinion, is the better team, but nebraska is tough at home. should make for a hell of a game.
Maybe Denard's right hand boo-boo from the Illinois game was affecting his play during practice last week and Borges/Hoke decided to stay with the grind-it-out plan for MSU. Has to be some reason they pulled back so much.
He'll be better this week, we'll score some points, and the D will do enough to slow Nebraska down. Also, we are due for some fumbles to roll our way and Nebraska does like to share the ball, so that will help our cause.
---This is the first time two conference foes with more than 850 wins will play.
---Only the second time the opposing QB's have 5,000 career passing and 2,000 career rushing yards apiece.
--The last time Brady Hoke coached against the Huskers in Lincoln was 2007, his Ball State team lost 41-40.
--Nebraska will celebrate the 50th anniversary of its NCAA-record sellout streak, our 323rd.
--The last time Michigan visited Lincoln was at the old Antelope Field in 1911. Fielding Yost was your coach. He coached the Huskers in 1898.
--My prediction: Nebraska’s won 10 straight, and 36-5 overall in home night games. This is Michigan's first ever visit to Memorial Stadium, you're 4-4 on the road, and Denard has been erratic away from home. Since everyone's predictions are all over the board and the two teams seem evenly matched, I'll pick Nebraska taking advantage of the home night game
Checkout the picture of your squad playing us 100 years ago below, also there's another mouseover and pan picture of the game here: http://www.huskermax.com/games/1911/08michigan.html
Is it possible that Brady puts a little more emphasis on beating Nebraska b/c of the '97 pity co- nat'l championship to them?
Without a doubt. I'm sure Brady is imploring the team right now to win the game tomorrow.....not for themselves.....not because it means they'll have the inside track to the B1G 10 Championship or any of that meaningless drivel.
Brady is begging them to win this one for the 97 Co-National Championship squad. I mean most of the players woud've been between 3-5 that year so I'm sure the game is burned into their memories......
Love the sarcasm bro!
It's not like most of the players were even alive for the legends patches were currently handing out, so it's not ridiculous to think that perhaps, perhaps the coaches are discussing our most recent nat'l championship.
Here's how I figure it: Nebraska isn't running the kind of high pressure defense that stymies Denard. And our defense has improved since the first few games, and is capable of pressuring Martinez, who isn't his best when pressured.
All things being equal, Michigan should have the edge in this game. I don't expect the team to be freaked out over the Sea of Red, either. This is their third hostile crowd and night game, and a good defense will give them more confidence.
Michigan by a touchdown.
But you haven't accounted for the black towels Nebraska is supposedly handing out to fans for this game. Waving those around should undoubtedly will undoubtedly subtract a TD or two that Michigan otherwise would have scored.
Then we may end up losing 2 to 3 B1G games. I think Michigan offense will score quite a few points. I think Robinson will be sitting out the 2nd half of the 4th QTR the lead could be so big!
Normally, if a team has the advantage on defense and special teams and is expected to have success running the ball, that team ought to be favored to win the game. Playing in Lincoln at night is tough, but I like UM about 30-17.