Preview: Iowa Comment Count

Ace

THE ESSENTIALS

WHAT Michigan (17-5, 9-1 B1G) at Iowa (17-6, 6-4)
WHERE Carver-Hawkeye Arena, Iowa City, Iowa
WHEN 2 pm Eastern, Saturday
LINE Iowa -5 (KenPom)
TV ESPN/WatchESPN (PBP: Bob Wischusen; Analyst: Dan Dakich)

Right: Michigan comfortably held serve at home in their first matchup with Iowa [Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog]

THE PREVIOUS MATCHUP

After defeating Wisconsin at the Kohl Center, Michigan handled Iowa at home, 75-67, in the second game of a three-game gauntlet that the Wolverines emerged from unscathed when they knocked off MSU at the Breslin Center.

Michigan kept a fast-paced Iowa squad out of transition, limiting the game to 66 possessions while outscoring the Hawkeyes 12-4 on the fast break. Nik Stauskas scored 26 while Hawkeye star Roy Devyn Marble was limited to just 13 points (3/9 FG, 5/6 FT) and two assists with four turnovers. Iowa's 1.02 points per trip was well below their current Big Ten mark of 1.17; this probably stands as Michigan's best defensive performance of the season considering the opponent and the fact that Derrick Walton missed almost the entire game due to flu-like symptoms.

First game preview. Instant recap. Brian's game column. OFAAT. Nik Stauskas feature w/ Iowa highlights.

THE LINEUP CARD

A reader suggested including jersey numbers in the preview to help make it easier to connect descriptions of players in the post to the guys running around on your TV, which makes so much sense I feel like an idiot for not doing this sooner.

Since the player descriptions often get clunky when I try to cram in various measurables and the like, I've decided to include a "lineup card" featuring every healthy player getting 25% or more of the team's available minutes. Also, in the grand tradition of unnecessarily long acronyms, the "SIBMIHHAT" column stands for "Should I Be Mad If He Hits A Three?"—the answer is based on the efficiency (and, to a lesser extent, 3PA frequency) of the shooter in question.* Starters are in bold:

Pos. # Name Yr. Ht./Wt. %Min %Poss SIBMIHHAT
G 10 Mike Gesell So. 6'1, 190 55.6 18.3 Kinda
Good assist:turnover ratio, mediocre shooter, fair number of steals
G 4 Roy Devyn Marble Sr. 6'6, 200 69.7 27.8 No
Very high usage, decent efficiency, draws lots of fouls, at best in transition
F 30 Aaron White Jr. 6'9, 220 65.0 20.9 Yes
Outrageously efficient scorer inside the arc, solid defensive rebounder
F 1 Melsahn Basabe Sr. 6'7, 220 47.7 18.6 Very
Rebounding machine, lots of putbacks, decent shot-blocker
C 34 Adam Woodbury So. 7'1, 245 40.7 18.6 Very
Excellent off. rebounder, developing post game, not many blocks or def. rebs.
F 20 Jarrod Uthoff So. 6'9, 208 46.6 19.3 Not at all
Efficient stretch four, good defensive rebounder and rim protector
F 15 Zach McCabe Sr. 6'7, 235 40.9 20.5 No
Takes nearly as many threes as twos, should consider taking fewer twos
C 0 Gabriel Olaseni Jr. 6'10, 225 38.9 21.5 Very
Insane off. rebound percent (18.3), blocks lots of shots, not a big post-up threat
G 5 Anthony Clemmens So. 6'1, 190 34.9 13.6 No
Extremely low usage, solid shooter, very turnover prone, possible DNP-CD
G 2 Josh Oglesby Jr. 6'5, 208 20.5 12.6 Not at all
Three-point specialist, injured for most of non-conf, now playing 17.5 mpg

Feedback is always welcome, but I think this is going to stick.

THE THEM

Iowa's stumbed a bit in recent weeks after racing out to a 4-1 start in Big Ten play. Beginning with their loss at the Crisler Center, they've dropped three of their last five—the two other losses coming at home against Michigan State (in OT) and Ohio State (by 7 in a game controlled by the Buckeyes).

Much of those struggles can be attributed to the up-and-down play of Roy Devyn Marble, who's shooting 5/18 from three over that span with a 9:19 assist-to-turnover ratio; while Marble isn't the point guard, he's the team's primary distributor in transition, and those numbers reflect that Iowa's having a much more difficult time getting into transition against conference foes. Marble is much more effective in transition—where he boasts a 53.8 eFG% and gets 57.4% of his assists, per hoop-math—than in halfcourt sets (44.4 eFG%). He's going to get to the free-throw line—before a 2/3 FT effort on Tuesday against OSU, he'd attempted no fewer than five FTs (and as many as 11) in six straight games—and probably score double-digit points; the key is making him work for them.

Point guard Mike Gesell was a total non-factor in the first matchup (4 points, 2 assists) despite the absence of Derrick Walton for most of that game; incidentally, his role looked a lot like Walton's, as he often spotted up on the perimeter while Marble initiated the offense. At his best, he's a very good passer who doesn't turn the ball over much, picks the right spots to shoot, and generates a steal or two. He's a very streaky shooter whose numbers (47%/32%/65%) are pretty mediocre.

Aaron White provides a significant matchup problem at the three; he's 6'9", shoots 65.6% inside the arc with range out to around 18 feet, and gets to the line—where he shoots 83.5%—at a very high rate. Nik Stauskas did an admirable job defending him in the first game, shutting White out until the final seconds of the first half before wearing down in the second; White finished with 17 points, but it took 12 FGA and 8 FTA to get there.

The other matchup to watch is Glenn Robinson III against power forward Melsahn Basabe, who exploded for 15 first-half points and three offensive rebounds in the first half against Michigan before disappearing in the latter stanza. He's one of the best rebounders in the country, especially considering his size, and generates points without dominating the ball; he's also a solid shot-blocker on the other end. Basabe platoons at the four with Jarrod Uthoff, a very solid shooter (54%/46%/80%) who's a slightly worse rebounder and better rim protector than Basabe.

Seven-footer Adam Woodbury is nearly Basabe's equal as an offensive rebounder (11.0 OReb%) and he's got a decent touch around the basket; however, his defensive rebounding and shot-blocking numbers are surprisingly low for a player of his size. He splits time pretty evenly with Gabriel Olaseni, who would boast a top-four OReb% (18.3) and top-50 block rate (9.5%) nationally if he played just a couple more minutes per game.

Other key reserves include forward Zach McCabe, a 34% three-point shooter, and guard Anthony Clemmens, a good shooter whose predilection for turnovers has led to a very reduced role in conference play. Clemmens' minutes have gone almost entirely to shooting specialist Josh Oglesby, a 6'5" wing who's hit 17/33 three-pointers this season. What was once an 11-man rotation has been essentially reduced to nine during Big Ten season.

THE RESUME

All six of Iowa's losses have come to teams ranked in the top 18 on KenPom; the only such opponent they've defeated is Ohio State in Columbus, though the Buckeyes avenged that loss on Tuesday. While the Hawkeyes don't have a bad loss, they're still searching for a signature win; aside from OSU, their best victory is a 21-point home blowout of #41 Minnesota.

THE TEMPO-FREE

Four factors, all games (national ranks in parentheses):

  eFG% Turnover % Off. Reb. % FTA/FGA
Offense 51.9 (78) 16.7 (65) 38.4 (16) 49.8 (29)
Defense 44.1 (16) 18.8 (145) 27.8 (28) 33.4 (45)

Conference-only (ten games, Big Ten ranks in parentheses):

  eFG% Turnover % Off. Reb. % FTA/FGA
Offense 50.6 (5) 18.0 (9) 36.4 (2) 53.4 (1)
Defense 47.3 (5) 17.8 (6) 25.9 (3) 38.2 (6)

Iowa's breakneck pace has predictably slowed a little in conference play, though they still boast the fastest tempo of any Big Ten team and the quickest offensive possessions—opponents combat this with the longest offensive possessions allowed by any Big Ten team. The Hawkeyes are heavily reliant on scoring via two-pointers (55.3% of their points, 2nd in B1G) and free throws (27.2%, 1st), and many of the former come on second-chance opportunities.

The defense isn't particularly good or bad at any one thing save the prevention of offensive rebounds, which they do quite well. One potential area to exploit is their perimeter defense, as they allow the second-most three-point attempts in the conference; Michigan was 8/27 from three in the first matchup and could've easily done better if Caris LeVert (0/3), Glenn Robinson III (0/5), and Spike Albrecht (1/3) didn't shoot well below their collective average despite getting open looks.

THE KEYS

Control the pace. Michigan managed to keep the tempo in their comfort zone the first time around due to their ability to make shots—it's pretty hard to run off of made baskets unless you're playing Purdue. Shot selection, turnovers, and picking the right time to crash the boards all play into this; while Michigan's transition offense can keep pace with Iowa's, their transition defense is poor to the point that they'll want to avoid an up-and-down game.

Keep it even on the boards. Despite Basabe's three first-half offensive rebounds, Michigan limited Iowa to just ten in the first matchup (31.2 OReb%) while hauling in ten of their own (30.3%); the Wolverines actually outscored the Hawkeyes 14-12 in second-chance points. Replicating that effort, or even coming close, would be a huge boon for their chances of pulling this one out. Robinson (4 ORs, 5 DRs in the first game) keeping pace with Basabe is the big matchup here.

Play the hot hands. Zak Irvin chipped in a key 11 points off the bench and Spike Albrecht had seven points and seven assists the first time around; getting that level of production off the bench would be huge against a deep Iowa squad that rotates frequently. While Albrecht probably won't get 35 minutes again, he could play a big role in this one—Gesell doesn't provide a huge matchup problem for him defensively. If Robinson or Walton can't find their shooting rhythm, going to the bench for better shooting will be key for keeping Iowa out of transition—which, if you can't tell by now, is the top priority for Michigan in this game.

THE SECTION WHERE I PREDICT THE SAME THING KENPOM DOES

Iowa by 5

Elsewhere

UMHoops preview. Maize n Brew preview.

------------------
*In other words, anger is high when a poor outside shooter hits one, and not so much when a good outside shooter does.

Comments

qbwaggle

February 7th, 2014 at 2:45 PM ^

Kenpom loves Iowa.

I admit that I don't know much (anything) of how Kenpom's system works, but Iowa is #11 and the top ranked B10 team (MSU is #12, Mich is #14).

I expected this game to be closer to a pick-em.

Ace

February 7th, 2014 at 2:59 PM ^

Even though KenPom adjusts for schedule, blowouts can skew the numbers a bit, and Iowa had a lot of wide-margin wins in their non-conference schedule, plus the blowout of Minnesota—that moved them up seven spots (from #12 to #5) on its own. It also helps that none of their losses are even remotely bad, and most of them were quite close.

ijohnb

February 7th, 2014 at 5:32 PM ^

Is very right on this one. Iowa is good, deep, and coming off a loss and on a home and home back to back. Carver hawk eye is murder, they need this game desperately. If we win this game it is far more "holy shit" than either at Kohl or at Breslin. I think we will play well........ I like us at Ohio far more that at Iowa.

Key Play

February 7th, 2014 at 2:49 PM ^

LIke the new formatting of the lineup card. Very informative and easy to read at a glance. I also totally understand the SIMBIHHAT, but it needs a better acronym IMO. I am frequently thinking in games that I hate whenever Gary Harris shoots a 3 because they are always a good shot, but love when Denzel Valentine shoots one.   

 

Maybe add PPG and RPG into the lineup card? ORTG? it's hard to pick and choose which stats are important. 

jmblue

February 7th, 2014 at 3:26 PM ^

I don't know, I think this is where KenPom can be misleading.  We had the lead the whole second half, but it felt like we could never put them away.  Iowa kept hanging around.  Looking back on it, it was a lot like our game at MSU, but without the game-deciding run by the visitors in the last 3 minutes.

jmblue

February 7th, 2014 at 4:19 PM ^

Yes, but it wouldn't have taken much for the actual numbers to have changed.  Say Iowa scores on that late fastbreak instead of Spike perfectly jumping the passing lane and picking it off, and suddenly our win percentage goes down, what, 10%?

But I won't belabor the point further.

Do you have the win probability chart for the MSU game?  I'm curious to see what it looked like when it was 49-41 and at other points. 

snarling wolverine

February 7th, 2014 at 6:47 PM ^

That seems more volatile from possession to possession than I would expect.  If I'm reading that correctly, each team had a 50% chance when we led 55-54, but then when MSU went ahead 58-55 a couple possessions later, they suddenly had a 75% chance, even though there were still six minutes left?  I guess the math backs it up, but it seems odd.

 

 

 

 

MH20

February 7th, 2014 at 7:24 PM ^

I am assuming that State's initial win probability of 68% (which obviously factors home court) afforded them extra leeway even after Michigan pulled ahead there, then gave them a huge spike when they regained that 3-point lead.

KenPom has a few blog posts about win probability that get pretty detailed.  They're an interesting read.

In-game win probabilities

Win probability for every college game

Jeff M

February 7th, 2014 at 3:47 PM ^

Add me to the list of those who like the new lineup card. Also agree that Kenpoms algorithms overrate Iowa due to some blowouts. UMs ability to prevent transition opportunities via their strengtus of few TOs and high shooting % are a good foil to Iowa's key strength. The key will be to maintain that and mitigate Iowa going crazy on Oreb. That said, definitely agree with Ace not deviating from the Kenpom prediction. Mini-feedback: Did the previews formerly show UMs rankings on the four factors along with the opponents or am I misremembering? In any case, I am interested enough to want to see those in the previews but too lazy to look them up. So take that for what little it is worth.

Go Blue in MN

February 7th, 2014 at 4:23 PM ^

I guess it depends on who you're more likely to be mad at.  If a good outside shooter drains an open 3, I'm mad at our guys for leaving him open.  If a poor outside shooter drains a 3, I'm still mad, but mad at fate, as in "Why does _______ get every f-in' break in this game?"    

allintime23

February 7th, 2014 at 4:38 PM ^

If we can win three of the next four I will smile and be happy for a week. But seriously this is it, this next stretch is the most important part of the big ten season. I think we go 3-1 with a loss in Columbus.

creelymonk10

February 7th, 2014 at 8:28 PM ^

True, plus they won with players having foot blisters and mono. Should've counted as 2 wins. 

But seriously, are foot blisters, the flu, and mono really something they needed to show a graphic for when showing all of MSU's injuries last night? It's become unwatchable with how much every telecast talks about it.

mistersuits

February 7th, 2014 at 5:18 PM ^

This is a championship game.

B1G championship race will be mostly determined over the next four games. Michigan can't lose two in this stretch and still win the championship (unless one of those wins is over MSU and then they would still need help).

MSU has avoided losses in 3 OT squeakers and they're only going to get better with Payne coming back. They will be favored in almost every game the rest of the way.

LightTheLamp

February 7th, 2014 at 5:29 PM ^

I love when sports guys go into a long analysis then when their game prediction comes up they take the spread and the score of the game they take the over/under, divide it in half and use the spread as the difference.

B-Nut-GoBlue

February 7th, 2014 at 5:41 PM ^

I know most don't watch Iowa as much as I do but Olaseni has come on lately, almost beast-mode like.  He will probably get his and be a tough matchup tomorrow afternoon.  I assume GRIII would guard him? 

Anyway, this is going to be a tough, tough game.  I know most think the way Iowa has squandered some games lately that they're slippin' and are considered a should-win game, but I'm pretty sure that won't be the case.  Especially becasue they've lost some at home recently, they're not going to want to lose another, and neither will the home crowed; they'll be amped.

Jonesy

February 7th, 2014 at 6:22 PM ^

We could easily lose any and all of the next four games, so I don't have any expectations.  We're gonna make the tourney so I'm happy.  I just hope we don't get screwed by the refs in any of these games, that pisses me off more than anything.

Low Key Recidivist

February 7th, 2014 at 6:56 PM ^

UM beat them comfortably at home missing their PG.  Carver Hawkeye is tough to play at, but their pace is going to play into UM's hands IMO.

Plus, while UM doesn't have as much depth, they have better talent.  

I've said it before, but it's all about ball screen defense, and the 5th year Engineer has been doing a bang up job in that department.

 

victorsvaliant01

February 7th, 2014 at 8:27 PM ^

It's a really great addition to what is already a great feature on this site--thanks for your continued efforts, Ace!

Wolverine In Iowa

February 7th, 2014 at 9:24 PM ^

Iowa keeps up their bad shooting form, and we do what is mentioned in the article - rebound well, and win the transition battle.  However, I had this game marked down as a loss at the beginning of the season, and I think that is what will happen.  A win will be a huge road win.

I am not going to the game, unfortunately.  The Hawkeye fans hate Stauskas, much like they hated Novak -- why, I do not know.

PAproudtoGoBlue

February 8th, 2014 at 1:48 AM ^

I'm not buying Iowa by 5. I do think D. Marble is the one that got away but we have more talent coming off our bench than Iowa has in their starting 5. No disrespect to Iowa they play great team/fast break hoops but minus the IU game I can't see a scenario where this team(Michigan) doesn't 'Rise to the Occasion." Go Blue by 3 and I only feel that because my crystal ball says we'll miss a couple FT's down the stretch and Iowa hits a desperation 3. But if I was a betting man and Vegas said +5 M I'd take that all day.