Preview: Indiana Comment Count

Ace

THE ESSENTIALS

WHAT Michigan (17-5, 7-2 B1G) vs
Indiana (18-4, 8-1)
WHERE Crisler Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan
WHEN 9 pm ET, Tuesday
LINE Michigan -3 (KenPom)
TV ESPN
PBP: Mike Tirico
Analyst: Dan Dakich

Right: Like it was going to be anything but this picture. [Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog]

THE US

John Beilein still won't speak in anything resembling specifics, but we're getting closer to Caris LeVert's return:

"Caris did more (Sunday) than he's done at all," Beilein said. "This was the first time he really tested himself more than he has. So it's day-to-day, and we'll wait and see when he's ready to go. It's ultimately going to be his decision. It could be soon. It could be later."

Beilein mentioned hoping for LeVert to return to the court "this week or next" on Dan Dakich's radio show Monday, so there's a possibility he sees some time tonight—he'll most likely come off the bench in his first game back, whenever that may be. As Beilein has said repeatedly, we'll know LeVert is back when he's participating in warmups, so your guess is as good as mine when it comes to a specific return date.

THE STAKES

Both Michigan and Indiana have benefited from easy opening halves of the Big Ten schedule; at least in part due to the schedule factor, both squads are in the thick of the conference title race. Indiana is tied atop the standings with Iowa; Michigan is a game back. This is the only regular-season meeting between M and IU this season; discussing tiebreaker situations at this stage is very much putting the cart before the horse, but it's at least worth noting.

This game also carries extra importance because Michigan and IU are both on the seven-seed line in the latest Bracket Matrix. There's a decent chance these two teams end up compared head-to-head when it's time for tournament seeding; in that context, it's critical for M to defend their home court.

THE LINEUP CARD

Projected starters are in bold. Hover over headers for stat explanations. The "Should I Be Mad If He Hits A Three" methodology: we're mad if a guy who's not good at shooting somehow hits one. Yes, you're still allowed to be unhappy if a proven shooter is left open. It's a free country.

Pos. # Name Yr. Ht./Wt. %Min %Poss SIBMIHHAT
G 11 Yogi Ferrell Sr. 6'0, 180 84 25 No
One of the best PGs in the country. Great outside shooter, distributor.
G 4 Robert Johnson So. 6'3, 195 60 18 No
Excellent three-point shooter. Inefficient inside arc. Turnover-prone.
F 30 Collin Hartman Jr. 6'7, 215 52 12 No
Low-usage, Just A Shooter™ type making 40% of threes.
F 5 Troy Williams Jr. 6'7, 215 65 26 No
Great athlete and finisher, impactful defender, improved shooter, TO-prone.
C 31 Thomas Bryant Fr. 6'10, 245 56 22 Yes
Top-flight post scorer also boasts strong rebounding and block rates.
G 2 Nick Zeisloft Sr. 6'4, 210 46 13 No
Has attempted 99 threes and 10 twos this season. 39% 3P shooter.
F 0 Max Bielfeldt Gr. 6'8, 240 43 20 No
Rebounding and finishing very well, second-best steal rate in B1G. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
F 3 OG Anunoby Fr. 6'8, 215 27 17 No
Efficient inside-outside scorer, good offensive rebounder, turnover-prone.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the preview.]

THE THEM

Indiana, as usual, is a really dangerous shooting team that occasionally gets themselves into trouble with sloppy play. Unlike last year, however, they now have a true post presence in freshman Thomas Bryant, who's shooting 75% on two-pointers while posting rebounding and block rates that rank among the best in the conference. He's helped make Indiana a more balanced offensive team and a much-improved defensive squad—while the schedule plays a significant factor, Indiana currently has the best defensive efficiency in the Big Ten after finishing 13th in 2014-15.

The heart of the team remains point guard Yogi Ferrell, who has a top-ten assist rate in the Big Ten while posting shooting splits of 43/55/77—yes, he's shooting better from outside the arc than inside in conference games by a large margin. Ferrell is joined in the backcourt by Robert Johnson, who's really struggled with his shooting and turnovers in B1G play; when he's on, he's a dangerous outside shooter.

Wing Collin Hartman mostly sticks to the perimeter; he's shooting a hair below 40% from three on the season and should draw Duncan Robinson in a matchup of similar-style players. Human pogo stick Troy Williams rounds out the starting lineup. In addition to being a constant threat to make Sportscenter, Williams is a good defensive rebounder, a major threat to get to the line, and he can even step out and knock down the occasional three. He'll be a tough test for Zak Irvin.

The two primary bench pieces are Nick Zeisloft, who almost exclusively attempts threes and makes 39% of them, and former Wolverine Max Bielfeldt, who plays both the four and the five. Bielfeldt's season-long numbers and conference-only numbers are quite impressive, but a closer look at his KenPom page reveals a significant dropoff against top competition, one that probably isn't shocking to those who watched him at Michigan:


Tier A is top-50 opponents (adjusted for home court); Tier A+B is top-100

Bielfeldt will likely have to defend either Zak Irvin or Mark Donnal when he's on the court; either matchup could be one Michigan chooses to exploit.

THE RESUME

Indiana played a relatively soft nonconference slate that featured wins over #31 Notre Dame and #47 Creighton, a blowout loss at #19 Duke, and upset losses against #91 UNLV and #120 Wake Forest. They've faced the easiest conference slate of any Big Ten team thus far; the Hoosiers split their season series against Wisconsin, which has been their highest-ranked B1G foe. Minnesota pushed them to the brink of an embarrassing home defeat on Saturday but IU held on. They're a tough team to figure out in large part because they've gone relatively untested in conference play.

THE TEMPO-FREE

Conference-only stats.


Four Factors explanation

Again, Indiana's schedule (and, in fairness, Michigan's too) makes it hard to take away too much from the conference-only stats. There's no question, however, that Indiana boasts one of the better shooting teams in the country; they're second nationally in eFG%, third in three-point percentage, and sixth in two-point percentage. They also do a good job crashing the boards—Bryant is especially effective in that regard—and their weak point is turnovers; aside from Zeisloft, who pretty much just catches and shoots, every rotation player has a turnover rate of 16 or higher.

The key to cracking Indiana's defense is finding a way to generate good looks from the outside; the Hoosiers are 19th nationally in 3PA/FGA allowed and their opponents score just 25% of their points on threes—for comparison, Michigan gets 42% of their points from beyond the arc.

THE KEYS

Capitalize in transition. Indiana, as discussed above, has done a great job of preventing opponents from getting good looks from the outside. They've struggled to take care of the ball, however, and Michigan has been very effective at creating wide-open threes in transition, especially for Duncan Robinson. The going won't be so easy in the halfcourt, so M must take advantage of their opportunities when they can run.

Attack mismatches. You can probably tell that I think Michigan should go at Bielfeldt when he's on the floor, whether that's getting the ball to the post when he's at center or running the offense through Zak Irvin when he's at the four. Dylan points out another potential mismatch that Irvin can exploit: Troy Williams is IU's worst pick-and-roll defender, according to Synergy.

Minimize second chances. The Hoosiers are going to get their points. The only starter who isn't a good outside shooter is Bryant, a dominant post scorer, which will make it difficult for Michigan to do anything but match up in man and do their best to limit the damage. In a game like this, it's imperative they keep the Hoosiers from crashing the glass and getting second-chance buckets; Michigan is going to have a very tough time doing the same on the other end, and keeping up with IU's shooters is difficult enough as is. A big all-around game from Derrick Walton, who's been excellent of late, would be really helpful tonight.

THE SECTION WHERE I PREDICT THE SAME THING KENPOM DOES

Michigan by 3.

As long as Bryant doesn't go off, Michigan can keep pace with Indiana's shooters, and they can gain a distinct edge by taking care of the rock—something the Hoosiers have struggled to do even in their best games.

ELSEWHERE

UMHoops preview. Maize n Brew preview. MnB Q&A with Crimson Quarry's Kyle Robbins. KenPom takes a look at Washington, which has embraced allowing its players to foul out of games, and his last paragraph probably won't shock you:

By the way, there has been only one team to avoid a disqualification this season. The last time a Michigan player fouled out was February 17th of last season when the human box-score line-break, Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman fouled out against Michigan State. My stance on when to sit players in foul trouble is somewhere between “ignore foul trouble completely” and “always sit guys in the first half that have two fouls”. It’s a very tough problem to study. But it seems to me that if you do subscribe to the latter approach, the fact that none of your players are fouling out is an indication your instincts for loss aversion are too strong.

Death to Autobench.

Comments

Nothsa

February 2nd, 2016 at 5:03 PM ^

OG was the dude who blinded Polyphemus.

            _......._
        .-'.'.'.'.'.'.`-.
      .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.`.
     /.'.'               '.\
     |.'    _.--...--._     |
     \    `._.-.....-._.'   /
     |     _..- .-. -.._   |
  .-.'    `.   ((@))  .'   '.-.
 ( ^ \      `--.   .-'     / ^ )
  \  /         .   .       \  /
  /          .'     '.  .-    \
 ( _.\    \ (_`-._.-'_)    /._\)
  `-' \   ' .--.          / `-'
      |  / /|_| `-._.'\   |
      |   |       |_| |   /-.._
  _..-\   `.--.______.'  |
       \       .....     |
        `.  .'      `.  /
          \           .'
   LGB     `-..___..-`

 

Wolverine In Iowa 68

February 2nd, 2016 at 3:58 PM ^

I fully expect Bielfeldt to come into this game with a Mike D'Antoni-sized chip on his shoulder.  I look for him to play his very best to show up the team that let him move on.  It may not be easy to "exploit" on him, as he'll likely be playing with a lot of emotion (which can be good or bad, depending on how it's channeled).

jsquigg

February 2nd, 2016 at 4:12 PM ^

Call me when Washington has more success than Michigan has had and will have under Beilein.  Coach B isn't perfect but I think I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

Muttley

February 2nd, 2016 at 4:45 PM ^

but damn, this feels like a must-win to get off to a good start in the second half of the B1G.

This is one of four tough games at home (Indiana, MSU, Purdue, & Iowa).  There are three tough away games (at OSU, Maryland, and Wiscy), leaving only two "should-wins" @Minny and home vs NW.

Indiana might be the easiest of the big four home games.  If we win tonight, we've got a good shot to take 3 (or even all 4 of them).  If we lose, then finishing significantly above .500 in the B1G looks harder and harder.

StephenRKass

February 2nd, 2016 at 5:21 PM ^

Several questions . . . 

  • Does Harbaugh go to the game?
  • If so, does he sit near his brother-in-law or in the Michigan section?
  • Does he root for Michigan or his sister's husband's team? (blood thicker than water?)
  • Do we care who Harbaugh roots for?
  • And the meta questions following on whether or not we care:  what causes us to give a pass to someone to root for a team we otherwise would hate? What do we do with family members? How close do they need to be? Child? Spouse? Sibling? Parent? In-laws seems to be stretching things. Obviously, you always root for the team your child plays for. Have any of you out there had a child play sports for OSU or MSU or ND? How does that affect your rooting interests?

Jonesy

February 2nd, 2016 at 6:00 PM ^

"Unlike last year, however, they now have a true post presence in freshman Thomas Bryant, who's shooting 75% on two-pointers while posting rebounding and block rates that rank among the best in the conference. He's helped make Indiana a more balanced offensive team and a much-improved defensive squad"

 

Why can't we get one of those?

blue90

February 2nd, 2016 at 7:48 PM ^

because I don't see us stopping him at all.  Donnal will put up some numbers himself but not too many, Bryant is a monster, I expect he'll rake up 15-20 points with some 10 rebounds.  I also don't have faith Walton can stop Yogi.  Yogi is too good and too experienced.  Walton has improved but not with the ability to handle Yogi.  

That being said, I think we can exploit their other players.  I think our 2, 3, and 4 spots are better than theirs, especially Zak and Duncan and we should be able to use that to our advantage.  

I HATE TOM CREAN as well, ditto for everyone else who already said it.  This will be nasty but I think we can crank it out.  78-74.

freejs

February 2nd, 2016 at 8:50 PM ^

so I hope it's just that, but it just feels like they can defend our weapons better than we can defend theirs. 

Not sure if our firepower can keep up with theirs. 

Pleasantly surprise me, boys.