Preview 2016: Quarterback Comment Count

Brian

Previously: Podcast 8.0. The Story.

IT JUST SO HAPPENS THAT YOUR QUARTERBACK HERE IS ONLY MOSTLY DEAD

23033357981_22c547df25_z

The Law of Harbaugh: it doesn't matter who your QB is [Bryan Fuller]

Midway through last season this space was openly wondering if Jake Rudock had some sort of disease that prevented him from doing quarterback good. Many theories were theorized. Eastern Shriveled Limb. Leaf's Palsy. The Harrington Syndrome. Akili's Aphid Aphasia. Whatever it was, it warn't good. Headstones were prepared. Ornamental flowers were arranged. Tuxes were rented. Boyz II Men was booked to sing "End Of The Road."

Then Jake Rudock erupted flaming from his own corpse. Pro Football Focus's #150 quarterback out of 159 qualifiers through week nine put the sword to a series of pass defenses ranging from comical (Indiana) to Nazgul in helmets (OSU, Florida), pulled his team's ass out of the fire repeatedly, finished as the second most efficient quarterback in the Big Ten, and got drafted. By the time the smoke cleared last year's Rudock MGo-prediction had gone from a millstone I'd wear around my neck until the end of time to dead on, as it were:

Rudock starts the whole year and turns in a season like last year at Iowa except more efficient: 60% completions, 8 YPA, excellent TD/INT.

64%, 7.8 YPA, 20-9 TD/INT. Rack it? Is that what we say? Someone with a moist goatee tell me the etiquette here.

Anyway. Rudock's surge from Iowa leftovers to sixth-round pick now goes on the Harbaugh quarterback tote board:

  • helped Rich Gannon(!) win the 2002 NFL MVP award,
  • developed non-scholarship San Diego's Josh Johnson into a third-place finisher for the Walter Payton, the I-AA Heisman, and the first draft pick in school history,
  • recruited and developed Andrew Luck,
  • salvaged Alex Smith's NFL career and got him a huge contract despite the fact that he simultaneously...
  • advocated for, drafted, and developed Colin Kaepernick into a legit starting NFL QB when few thought he could make the transition from the Nevada pistol, and
  • molded would-be Iowa backup Jake Rudock into a sixth-round draft pick.

The only point in Harbaugh's coaching career that he didn't have a quarterback somewhere between good and great was his first two years at a 1-11 Stanford program that had been driven off several increasingly tall cliffs before his arrival. And one of those guys beat USC at the height of its Pete Carroll power.

On one level, "who is the starting quarterback?" is the single most critical question about the 2016 Michigan Wolverines. On another level, eh, it'll be fine.

[After THE JUMP: people on this year's roster!]

MY DEPTH CHART'S SO GUESSILICIOUS

28454568724_45c4cb3b3f_z (1)

best frenemies [Eric Upchurch]

QUARTERBACK Yr
Wilton Speight So.*
John O'Korn Jr.*
Shane Morris Jr.*

RATING: 3.

So. This space had been projecting John O'Korn as the starter even after spring practice, when Speight inched ahead. So had most other people, but we were all guessing wildly. The decision as to the starter was very much a 51/49 kind of thing, with all projections surrounded by layers of hedging. Early in fall camp 247 surveyed various insiders and got approving mentions for both competitors; they also detailed the choice facing the coaching staff:

In June, we were told Speight was the leader heading into fall camp, and that if O'Korn could tone down the mistakes, he might be the player with the higher ceiling.

Gunslinger versus game manager. Fight.

The uncertainly abruptly resolved itself into a bonafide expectation on Friday, when Wilton Speight was anointed the starter on the internet. The internet is not Jim Harbaugh, and Speight was on point when he told assembled media members that "not many people know what goes on in coach Harbaugh's mind." Still, it seems like a thing.

You'll have to rely on my internet spidey-sense here because we're about to delve into anonymous internet insiders. So there's this guy who goes by UMBig11, give or take some caps, and he's been saying things on 247 and our comments for a bit; he also gives Rivals some of their stuff. In my opinion, he's credible, and just a few hours after Rivals said it was Speight he posted the same thing on our board. Since then various sites have confirmed that expectation.

FWIW, this was the vibe that multiple reporters got when Harbaugh put Speight, O'Korn, and Morris in front of the media a few days ago:

It would now be a surprise—but not a shock—if it wasn't Speight. So about him…

DOOR #1: THE GAME MANAGER(?)

22634644826_b030279d7e_z

manage manage manage [Patrick Barron]

WILTON SPEIGHT [recruiting profile] was the backup last year and neck and neck with O'Korn through spring. Speight's spring game performance was approximately on par with O'Korn's, for O'Korn truthers insistent on Speight's candidacy as motivational ploy even at this late date.

Speight did get in for chunks of the Minnesota and OSU games last year. His performance was what you might expect from a middling three-star redshirt freshman suddenly thrust into the fire. He looked overwhelmed. He was horrendous. He spurred tweets about Russell Bellomy.

Then he put together a game-winning drive. First off he hit Jake Butt near the first down marker, then Khalid Hill on a drag. Those were simple; a read and throw on a double post for a touchdown was less so:

The ensuing two point conversion turned out to be critical for Michigan's eventual victory and featured Speight moving around in the pocket and finding a tiny window for the points.

The grim three-and-out parade and unflattering comparisons melted away. Michigan won on a goal line stand that never should have happened for six different reasons; Rudock returned the next week and Speight faded into the background.

He re-emerged after Rudock was knocked out against Ohio State, and again looked completely overwhelmed for a half-dozen throws. After the shell-shock period he looked reasonably good. All of this was garbage time to be taken it with a grain of salt, but there was a nice anticipation throw in there:

That playing time was brief and unimpressive and totally expected for a redshirt freshman backup. He had a tendency to panic under pressure; a number of the throws I filed IN or BR against OSU came when he got sped up and threw it to nobody in particular.

Speight made a move obvious to anyone watching him in spring. His performance at the game itself was polished and confident, with just one errant throw, that a fade that took Grant Perry out of bounds. Hennechart:

[Note: I've rearranged the columns on the Hennechart so that they are now in approximate order of good play to bad.]

Opponent DO CA MA IN BR TA BA PR SCR DSR
Minnesota 1 3+     2* 1     1 63%
OSU 1* 4 2 3* 2   1     46%
Spring   5   1         1 86%

Obviously this is little to go on, but Speight shook that feeling of panic he showed early against both Minnesota and OSU. Ace:

When it came to the two main competitors for the starting job, the QBs were a bright spot. Wilton Speight looked like a different player than the one whose nerves seemed to affect his ability to throw a spiral when he came on against Minnesota last year. He missed a deep ball to Grant Perry; everything else was on-target, and he even made an impact with his legs. He’s making a legitimate push for the job.

Jedd Fisch:

“Wilton’s somebody that has really matured over a year. I think that going into last year’s camp, he’s a much different person than he is going into this year’s camp. He’s taken on the maturity, he’s taken on a lot of responsibility. The obvious game against Minnesota gave him a kind of confidence, you know. He’s excited about it. He’s excited that that’s not going to be the only touchdown he ever throws for Michigan, and I think that’s his mindset, that that’s not going to be my last touchdown.”

I made similar observations after seeing him a couple times in the spring. The occasional wobble on Speight's throws was gone and his arm strength seemed a lot better because he was getting throws out on time consistently. If the real Speight is the guy who led the winning Minnesota drive and was okay-ish after a rough start against OSU, that's a viable player. It looks like things are trending that way. So much so that when Speight tells this to assembled media

"Because it's me, I can remember back to the same plays we ran last year. I watch film and I can remember a rep or a play and I remember thinking last year 'this is so fast, the game is so fast.' It looked like a blur," Speight says. "This year in camp, and in the spring, I drop back and the game is so much slower. I can see guys come open before they're open now, that's the biggest thing.

"Everything's slowed down now."

…it seems plausible.

You know that I have to say this bit: there probably hasn't been an offensive coordinator/QB coach in the history of college football with a recruiting touch as leaden as Al Borges. This quote from Speight during his recruitment is boggling now and will only get worse as time proceeds:

"In their eyes, myself, David Cornwell, and this kid from IMG Academy Michael O'Connor are the best quarterbacks in the nation in this class," Speight said.

Cornwell and O'Conner aren't even in the conversation at Alabama and Penn State, respectively; that recruiting class contained Brad Kaaya, Deshaun Watson, and DeShone Kizer. Kizer, a Toledo kid, was clamoring for a Michigan offer that never came. Not great, Bob.

Speight is the last hope that Borges will ever recruit a QB who finishes his career as the starting quarterback. (Only one Borges-recruited QB has ever been at the top of a depth chart, and Indiana's Cam Coffman moved to tight end after a single year as a starter.) Jim Harbaugh evidently has the ability to turn you or I into a fifth-round pick and Speight will no doubt be okay if he is indeed the guy, but his recruitment offers zero encouragement.

DOOR #2: THE GUNSLINGER

25576744393_79c02f6c72_z

sling sling sling [Eric Upchurch]

Houston transfer JOHN O'KORN is without question the high-upside option. He's got a big arm and escapability Wilton Speight doesn't. He's great on the run, especially on plays that break down into improvisation. You couldn't throw a rock on a subscription message board last year without hitting an insider who swore up and down that O'Korn, not Jake Rudock, was the best quarterback on the roster. That might have been faint praise early. Late not so much.

He is also the high-downside option. He was thrust into the starting lineup at Houston as a true freshman and performed, completing 58% of his passes for a whopping 3117 yards, 28 touchdowns, and 10 interceptions. However, there are a number of caveats in there that Bill Connelly struck upon when he previewed the Cougars going into 2014:

  • The sheer quantity of passing he was called upon to do gave him an edge when it came to counting numbers. His 446 attempts are matched only by John Navarre in the annals of Michigan history; those 3000+ yards come out to a middling 7 yards a pop.
  • Opponents got their hands on a ton of O'Korn's passes. 76 of his attempts were touched by the opposition. Ten were intercepted. On average you would expect a whopping 19 of those to get picked off.
  • He faded badly late. His last five games: 98-for-199 (49%), 996 yards (5.0 per pass), six touchdowns, six interceptions.

That fade only got worse in 2015. Houston's offensive coordinator lit out for greener pastures, some jabroni was brought in to replace him, four offensive line starters graduated, and O'Korn and the rest of the Houston offense went off one of those cliffs Stanford had previously traversed. By the time he was permanently benched for Greg Ward, O'Korn was completing just 52% of his passes for 4.8 yards an attempt with 6 TDs and 8 INTs. PFF had him 133rd of 135 in their "adjusted completion percentage" metric.

The final straw was a horrendous game against Central Florida:

O'Korn looked like Christian Hackenberg trying to throw out of a paint shaker for the duration, went to the bench early in the third quarter, and never returned. A few months later he was in Ann Arbor.

Jim Harbaugh's goal here is to turn O'Korn from Ryan Mallett. Michigan edition, into Ryan Mallett, Arkansas edition. There were a lot of factors that helped O'Korn down the highway to hell. When O'Korn looked good, as he did against BYU a few weeks before his benching, he looked like a guy with the weight of the world on his shoulders. He suffered a lot of drops and his offensive coordinator basically never managed to work guys free like Harbaugh did for Rudock a year ago. It was all contested throws, obvious screens, and pop passes on which opposition safeties were obliterating his receivers as soon as the ball arrived.

O'Korn offers a lot to work with if you can just give him a valium and get to polishing, and his performance in the spring game was a major step in the right direction:


While a couple of those scrambles may have been premature, those were the only erroneous decisions on the day. O'Korn was accurate, decisive, and sane. His weird sidearm delivery and tendency to drift backwards like a dude who sucks at Madden were close to absent.

A look at a Hennechart of selected games might be illuminating here. A reminder that * means a particular bad event was an extremely bad version of that event and + is for a successful throw made under serious duress or after escaping the pocket.

Game DO CA SCR PR MA BA TA IN BR DSR
Rice 2013 4 14(4) 2 2 3   1* 6** 3* 62%
BYU 2014 4++ 29(6)++++   5 1   4 9(1) 1 66%
UCF 2014 1 12(4) 2   4   4 7(3) 1* 55%
Spring Game 2015 2 6 4 2 2   3 2   71%

You can see the wildness as a freshman. Lot of great throws in the Rice game on not a ton of attempts; four starred incidents.

You can see the oppressiveness of the 2014 Cougar offense versus BYU: six + throws, five snaps on which he was pressured so fast he could not realistically be expected to do anything. You don't see the gap between those successful throws and his stats as his receivers dropped a ton of balls.

You can see the total implosion as that season went along: against UCF O'Korn turfed three of seven screens and threw a boggling interception.

And then you get something that looks like a much more refined player. Nothing crazy either way. His accuracy is still a bit off, but most of those decisions to take off you remember from the spring game were correct. A year with Harbaugh seems to taken much of the wild-eyed berserking out of O'Korn. If he does end up playing he'll probably be fine, with a lingering tendency to throw balls up for grabs. At the same media availability that Speight offered the quote about things slowing down for him, O'Korn sounded like a guy who hadn't quite got there yet:

"I think you heard coach talk about eliminating the big mistake. That's something I felt I've done very well with in this camp," he said. "In spring ball, I wasn't as comfortable with the reads. I was still trying to feel out being back in the huddle, leading a team. I got all the kinks out in spring ball. I feel like that's been my biggest stride. Attention (to detail with) the offense and just being able to go out and play ball again."

He'll play in the first three games a bunch, and there's a nonzero chance he ends up emerging a la Kaepernick if Speight opens the door for him.

EXPECTATIONS

22556525583_336053c622_z

possibly the best QB on the roster still [Upchurch]

Whoever gets the starting nod will have one huge advantage over early-season Rudock: experience. Rudock only arrived in fall camp last year. Speight and O'Korn have as much experience with the Harbaugh offense as Rudock does even now. Fisch:

"It's a huge difference from when we had this conversation last year. ... A lot of it last year in those discussions was just guessing. Now, we have film on Wilton in the games he played last year. We had meetings with them all of last year, all spring and their preparation has been excellent.

"Now it's exciting. You can build off of last year without the approach of too much newness. ... Now we can show them film of Michigan people doing it, rather than someone else."

It's probably irrational to believe that the starter will be late-season Rudock. Despite Rudock's early struggles this is a guy who was a solid two-year starter at Iowa prior to his arrival. Speight has about two quarters of on-field experience, and O'Korn's season and a half ended in disaster.

But neither should start out as rough as Rudock did. The guy who wins the job has a fully weaponized Jehu Chesson, Jake Butt, and Amara Darboh, a slot receiver who's not going to conjure interceptions out of nowhere, and most of a good pass-blocking offensive line back. Also the opener is Hawaii, not Utah. The end result should be somewhere near last year's outcome: 60% completions, 8 YPA, 2:1 TD-INT. The ride there should be far less turbulent.

If it sounds crazy that I'm projecting a new starter to be amongst the most efficient QBs in the Big Ten, please keep in mind that this year's crop of QBs is CJ Beathard and zero other players who graded positively per PFF. (JT Barrett was positive overall but negative as a passer.) It's a very BIG TEN year. 8 YPA isn't gangbusters nationally.

The starter will be okay. He will not submarine the season; he will not carry the team. Unless, you know, Harbaugh.

BACKUPS

25574636324_7a797ab3fa_k18373526714_8af6cb4429_k26190969565_1aa8b72af7_k

Morris grew a beard, so yeah man[Upchurch/Fuller/Upchurch]

Redshirt junior SHANE MORRIS [recruiting profile] was definitively behind the two leaders per both Harbaugh press conference answers and spring game deployment—Morris mostly played slot receiver. In the aftermath he promised the press that he was still a quarterback, and he still is.

Without an injury crisis he is exceedingly unlikely to play. There's been some talk he's trying to get on special teams just so he can see the field. His odd mid-career redshirt a year ago looks like the result of a frank conversation between Morris and Harbaugh that not only was he miles behind Jake Rudock but also Speight, who was called upon in multiple games. No coach is going to redshirt his backup quarterback; despite approving chatter last year Morris apparently wasn't #2. At this point he's neither the present nor the future and is likely to take a grad transfer after the season.

A couple guys vying to be the future are already on campus. Early-enrolling freshman BRANDON PETERS [recruiting profile] comes with a boatload of hype and a certain resemblance to Andrew Luck. You don't even have to squint that hard. He's a little skinny and didn't play big-time competition in Indiana and is also a true freshman, so he needs some work. He started putting that in this spring, drawing repeated approval from Harbaugh:

“It’s impressive what he did, as young as he is, being out here for the first time,” Harbaugh said. “He’s got some real coolness about him. It showed up over and over each of the four days. He’s not a guy that panics. He’s a natural in a lot of ways. I was very excited about what he did.”

He's guaranteed a redshirt unless that injury crisis descends. Even Luck redshirted. As for the future, it could come sooner than you think. Webb reports that he's the "most talented quarterback on the roster" and that he will be a serious threat in 2017.

Redshirt freshman ALEX MALZONE [recruiting profile] dropped off everyone's radar after a freshman-like 2015 spring game performance placed him definitively behind Morris in the pecking order. This spring all the talk about young guys both public and private focused on Peters. Ominously, when Harbaugh extends the QB competition discussion past the two leaders Malzone doesn't get mentioned:

Harbaugh has maintained that both Speight and O'Korn were ahead of both Morris and true freshman Brandon Peters. But he did say that all four will get their chance to compete for the job this fall. The other quarterbacks -- redshirt freshmen Alex Malzone and the walk-ons -- will likely be working from behind.

Malzone is a short, relatively polished guy who's going to have to be Drew Brees or Tom Brady to make it, he's got a narrow window of opportunity to put himself in the 2018 conversation before Dylan McCaffrey and whoever else arrive.

Comments

ST3

August 29th, 2016 at 1:38 PM ^

He mentioned Jake went in the 6th round multiple times. Brian said Harbaugh could take you (a former Jedi-Master) or I, a license plate, and make us a 5th round pick. Presumably because he'd have more time to work with us than he did Rudock.

BlueLikeJazz

August 29th, 2016 at 12:52 PM ^

that this year's opening schedule is so soft and all at home. I feel pretty confident that whoever wins the job will be ready to roll by the time serious defensive and/or road pressure comes at him.

uncle leo

August 29th, 2016 at 1:21 PM ^

To be honest. I'd rather the QB be challenged early and have those "thrown into the fire" moments when it really gets intense and he has to travel to OSU, MSU, and Iowa.

Having a bunch of cupcakes other than Wisconsin is going to potentially give a false blanket of comfort and then reality will strike.

schreibee

August 29th, 2016 at 1:54 PM ^

1)  Penn St is a "cupcake" now? I mean I'm sure they've got issues, but somehow I don't see the outcome of that game looking like the outcome of HI or UCF. Minnesota gives us tough games sometimes, for that matter.

2) I believe both Speight & O'Korn play in non-conference games, and the "real" starter will be named before B1G games. Giving Speight the start in early games is saying "This guy has been here and played here" and "Take care of the ball." Good statements.

3) The post says Peters will definitely redshirt, as even Luck did, but I've advocating for getting him some PT in '16, both so he can have game action under his belt to compete for the starting job in '17, AND to put a bit of space between he & McCaffrey. 

4) DAMN, I'm optimistic for the first time in a while! That feels both good & scary!!! I mean, I don't know how we catch up to osu with the recruiting they've been doing and the coaching they get, but if anyone CAN do it, it's OUR coach!

5) GO BLUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whole Milk

August 29th, 2016 at 5:00 PM ^

I realize that from a fan's perspective, having separation between your two blue-chip recruits at Quarterback has a certain level of appeal, but I've never understood why that is a viable argument for something to do.

If you want to get Peters experience this year for an opportunity to play next year, that is viable reasoning to get him in the game and burn a redshirt, but I would hardly think Harbuagh would ever think it is optimal to burn a guys redshirt, who is unneeded this year just to get separation between two guys. Why not want a 3 year competition between two blue-chippers where the best man wins, instead of 2?

uncle leo

August 29th, 2016 at 4:00 PM ^

Doesn't mean they lose two games. I would just rather see Michigan play a good opponent at home like MSU did with Oregon so the QB gets real, legit experience off the get-go. And isn't that a better thing for the fans as well? How much more exciting would a home game against a good to great team be instead of 4 potential snoozers? We wait all flippin summer for college football and I have a feeling a lot of fans will be seeing what else is on at the 3rd quarter in all the early contests.

And no, Penn State is not a challenge. Michigan enforced their will on PSU on the road last year, and there's no reason to think that they'll improve with Franklin at the helm.

WolverineHistorian

August 29th, 2016 at 1:26 PM ^

Very, very, VERY fortunate to have that early schedule. I always get a little apprehensive when we're starting a new QB.

The last time we lost less than 3 games when breaking in a new QB was with Rick Leach in 1975. I'm really hoping for better than that this year because Harbaugh. But my head keeps telling me that new QB means occasional growing pains and I shouldn't get overly excited.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

A Real Toe Tapper

August 29th, 2016 at 1:58 PM ^

"QB will be fine because Harbaugh" is a security blanket reaction that I just can't get behind.  

I expect the QB play to cost Michigan 1-2 games this year.  We're not exactly choosing between two blue chippers, and I don't see how this team gets through that schedule unscathed without high quality QB play.  "Because Harbaugh" probably does mean that we will have decent QB play from one of these two players (or both).  But you don't beat all of MSU, OSU, and Iowa on the road without something better than that.  At some point this year they are going to need the QB to pull one out of a hat and win the game.  I'm not seeing it.  And one throw against Minnesota does not mean it will all be ok, particularly where that one throw came in the wake of several very ugly throws.  

WolverineHistorian

August 29th, 2016 at 3:13 PM ^

Yes. That's the thing that keeps nagging at me. And it just comes naturally with a new QB. There are some exceptions...and I really hate using those fuckers as an example but in 2013, MSU had to break in Connor Cook. They had to rely on their defense to score points in their first two games against lowly South Florida and Western because their offense couldn't cross the street. Then, somehow, they finished 12-1 and won the Rose Bowl. I don't know where Cook was rated as a recruit but superior coaching can do wonders.

Still, as excellent a coach Harbaugh is, my head won't allow me to use the argument that this and that will be fine because Harbaugh. Your homerism has to have some limits. And breaking in new QB's is not ways pretty.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

WolverineHistorian

August 29th, 2016 at 6:02 PM ^

I looked it up and it was basically a 2 QB system with Andrew Maxwell and Cook for those first couple of games where they tried and failed to generate any type of offense. Both QB's were abysmal. Then somehow after game 3, Cook got the nod and started playing well and they ran the table.

turd ferguson

August 29th, 2016 at 1:05 PM ^

I think Speight is probably much better than we remember him, and I totally trust that Harbaugh & Fisch made the right choice, but I'm still a little disappointed that O'Korn didn't win the job.  Here's how I see it:

On a 1-10 scale, Speight was going to fall somewhere between a 4 and 7 going into this year.  O'Korn could have been anything from 2 to 10.  Last year's buzz on O'Korn made me think he was already a 7 or 8, with room to grow.  Now it looks like Speight might have hit the upper end of his range (7), but we missed on what seemed like a real possibility to have an 8 or 9 there.

turd ferguson

August 29th, 2016 at 1:33 PM ^

No, that's not what I said.

"On a 1-10 scale, Speight was going to fall somewhere between a 4 and 7 going into this year."

It's hard to me to believe that Speight, right at this moment, is at the level of a 2006 Chad Henne (an 8), 2013 AJ McCarron (a 9), or 2011 Andrew Luck (a 10).

theytookourjobs

August 29th, 2016 at 1:45 PM ^

but the coaches are going to play the guy that gives them the best chance to win RIGHT NOW.  They're not going to play O'Korn just because there may be potential for him to turn out better than Speight in the future.  I think it's also feasible that Speight starts all year, but O'Korn overtakes him next season

dragonchild

August 29th, 2016 at 1:25 PM ^

Carr started Drew Henson (the high-ceiling Gunslinger); eventually Tom Brady was bailing him out of games.  Of course, Tom Brady washed out while Drew Henson went on to become a first-ballot HoF NFL QB.  Or maybe it was the other way around?  Eh, it's not like any whippersnappers here heard of either of 'em.  Anyway, Game Managers can be OK too.

P.S. Getting drafted in the 6th round and then climbing the depth chart of a laughingstock franchise is a great way to follow Tom Brady's footsteps, Jake

Ron Utah

August 29th, 2016 at 1:15 PM ^

I am so excited. Speight seems ready for the job and I'm happy for him. I had a slight lean towards JO'K too, but if Speight won the start I expect he will be more than capable. Let's not forget that Brian Griese--hardly a physical marvel--captained the offense to our last national championship. GO BLUE!



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

turd ferguson

August 29th, 2016 at 1:19 PM ^

Even before hearing that umbig11 has knowledge/access, I got a kick out of his posts.  That's partly because I think he upvotes all of his posts right after he makes them.  And that's partly because of his enthusiasm, optimism, and use of exclamation points.  I remember thinking that if Harbaugh posts here, that's the most likely account.

True Blue in CO

August 29th, 2016 at 1:17 PM ^

We have to trust Coach Fisch and Coach Harbaugh on the selection of the starter. Also the first 3 games should allow for valuable snaps for the second quarterback. We did not have this luxury last year. Our QB play is going to be dependent 100% on our OLine performance.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

maizenblue92

August 29th, 2016 at 1:19 PM ^

That recruiting profile starts good and ends bleak. The Peters stuff at the end is music to my ears because I have been telling people I think he steals the job midway through next season.

mgeoffriau

August 29th, 2016 at 1:21 PM ^

This is why I read this site:

O'Korn looked like Christian Hackenberg trying to throw out of a paint shaker

 

Also, if at least one copy of this image isn't named knuckle.jpg, I am very disappointed.