Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 4 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 3 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,345 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 237 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 8 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    32 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    102 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    1 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    58 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    18 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    17 replies
  • Coach B w Andy Katz podcast
    3 replies
  • Michigan Alumni Club Scholarship Golf Tournament featuring Honorary Chair Glen Rice - This Saturday in Miami!
    5 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    114 replies
  • OT: UCL Semi-final First Legs
    14 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    61 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    79 replies
  • New Jersey DE Aeneas DiCosmo: Prospect we should all want at UM
    55 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    28 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    102 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    32 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    58 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    18 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    1 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    17 replies
  • Coach B w Andy Katz podcast
    3 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    114 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    61 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • Michigan Alumni Club Scholarship Golf Tournament featuring Honorary Chair Glen Rice - This Saturday in Miami!
    5 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    79 replies
  • New Jersey DE Aeneas DiCosmo: Prospect we should all want at UM
    55 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    28 replies
  • Pep and Partridge Pressers
    11 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    129 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    114 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    100 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    92 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Picture Pages: Scrape Counterpunch

By Brian — September 17th, 2009 at 11:56 AM — 53 comments
Filed under:
  • brandon minor
  • david molk
  • david moosman
  • kevin koger
  • mark huyge
  • picture pages
  • scrape exchange
  • zone counter
  • zone read
  • zone read dive

Last week in Picture Pages we saw one of Michigan's counters to the "scrape exchange" that Western ran constantly last game. Michigan ran a ton of bubble screens or "long handoff"* routes and gave Forcier another option after he decided to pull the ball out: run or toss it to a (usually) wide open receiver. Once Forcier got over some early jitters, this worked well.

Notre Dame was determined to take that away:

zone-read-dive-1

This is Michigan's first drive of the second half. Michigan's moved the ball and just got a gashing Brandon Minor run on a zone stretch. They're going to play off that success here.

You can see Notre Dame's response to what they saw in the Western game: line up in press coverage all day, including over the slot receiver. There will be no bubbles here. To prevent Notre Dame from being outnumbered in the box, 80% of the time Notre Dame walks one or both safeties up just before the snap. And to deal with the zone read, Notre Dame is running a scrape exchange every play. (Reminder: on a scrape exchange the backside DE just hauls ass for the tailback and a linebacker pops out to contain the QB.)

Notre Dame has countered Michigan's counter to their counter and pretty much shut down Michigan's rushing attack in the first half. But it's time for the counter-counter-counter-counter.

Here's the snap as it approaches the handoff point. Note that 1) there's no bubble available and 2) Kevin Koger is pulling across the formation. Oh and 3) Moosman, who is the second OL from the top, is just drive blocking his guy instead of taking zone steps to the left in an attempt to get his helmet across. His ability to shove the DT back a yard or two is key to this play.

zone-read-dive-2

A couple of moments later, Michigan's diabolical plan is revealed:

zone-read-dive-3

Points of interest:

  1. Kevin Koger's pull block pops the backside defensive end, providing a lane between that guy and RG David Moosman.
  2. Mark Huyge gets a free release on the linebacker, who you can see moving upfield and to the outside to contain Forcier. When he realizes Forcier does not have the ball he will have run himself into a spot where Huyge has a great angle to block him.
  3. Molk and Moosman have terrific angles to block their guys. Why are these blocks so easy? Notre Dame is anticipating a stretch play, which is what Michigan usually runs from this formation, and if it was a stretch play it would be imperative for them to get playside of their blockers. On this counter, that expectation runs them into places where it's easy to seal them away from the play.

This is basically over. A moment later, you can see the motion of the scrape linebacker has taken him into Huyge's block and that Moosman and Molk have locked up their defenders. Brandon Minor doesn't even have to cut:

zone-read-dive-4

Zip!

zone-read-dive-5

The play ends at the one yard line. Watch it in glorious Youtube-o-vision:

Minor misses a cut on first down, Forcier fumbles on second, and a pitch gets blown up on third; Michigan misses a chip shot field goal, providing yrs truly with a wave of despair. But it ended well: Michigan was provided a short field on the next drive after a Notre Dame fumble and went from the 26 to the 7 with a six-yard stretch and 13 more on this play; that drive ended in a touchdown.

*(I don't have good lingo for that. Basically, the outside receiver stands there.)

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
September 17th, 2009 at 12:03 PM
#2
BlockM
BlockM's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 28426
This is clearly a schematic

This is clearly a schematic advantage.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:49 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
enlightenedbum
enlightenedbum's picture
Joined: 06/06/2009
MGoPoints: 19822
But

Is it a DECIDED schematic advantage? Hm?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 3:46 PM
(Reply to #34) #4
BlockM
BlockM's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 28426
No one has to decide. It just

No one has to decide. It just is.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:06 PM
#5
gmbblue
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 6
This site is the best

I have no clue why the pay sites cant keep up.........actually I do, talent!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:27 PM
(Reply to #3) #6
bryemye
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 2689
seconded

I learn a lot about football here. I do have a question though: Is this an option? If so, what is Forcier reading here? Would it be number 2 to see if Huyge can get a block inside there? If the scrape doesn't sell out wide for Forcier, he tucks it and goes around to run?

If so, he's rolling to the side, so why is Stonum bubble screening? I don't see how the play could go his way on any kind of read, in which case he should be blocking.

By the way, these features are very, very cool. As is our offense.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 2:15 PM
(Reply to #30) #7
e.go.blue
e.go.blue's picture
Joined: 03/25/2009
MGoPoints: 624
I don't think this is an

I don't think this is an option...just a set handoff to mix things up out of a formation the defense thinks will be an option play. Stonum is only feigning the bubble screen to keep his cornerback from racing down the field to make a tackle. This is an expertly designed play. Coach Rod is a smart guy.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 3:20 PM
(Reply to #39) #8
bryemye
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 2689
but he rolls right

I see how it happens so fast that it's probably not a read, but Forcier is clearly faking going around the right side after handing the ball off. I guess it's really pretty close to a moot point, but I feel like in press coverage the corner isn't going to be remotely scared of a bubble screen and Stonum would be better off engaging the guy. I suppose hindsight (from above!) = 20/20.

Again, all the checks and balances of this are very cool, and this isn't a criticism of this play so much as trying to understand it. As a former hs receiver I remember that on running plays my coach would often give the option of trying to fake like I was running a route or just block the guy if it was an up the middle play anyway. I assume in college they are less loose, but maybe not. In THAT case Stonum should be slightly less lazy :p

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:06 PM
#9
Subrosa
Subrosa's picture
Joined: 08/16/2008
MGoPoints: 355
Awesome.

I love it when the picture pages have pretty pictures.

Question- What would this play be called? Is it a zone read dive? If so, is there really a read option for the QB here? Or is this the veer?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 2:27 PM
(Reply to #4) #10
Brian
Brian's picture
Joined: 05/26/2008
MGoPoints: 118114
I don't think this has a

I don't think this has a read. I can take suggestions for something else to call it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:08 PM
#11
Ike
Joined: 02/08/2009
MGoPoints: 107
Koger

I love the way they've used Koger in that H-Back position. I think the versatility he provides there is going to be a defensive nightmare all season.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:53 PM
(Reply to #5) #12
msoccer10
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 1754
That's exactly

what I was thinking. I love Koger and think he will be an all-american before he is done.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 2:31 PM
(Reply to #5) #13
DocV8
DocV8's picture
Joined: 09/29/2008
MGoPoints: 0
w00t for...

...non-whiffed TE blocking.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:10 PM
#14
aenima0311
aenima0311's picture
Joined: 11/21/2008
MGoPoints: 717
I love that I can be

I love that I can be confidant that our coaches can and will make halftime adjustments to plays that aren't working.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:13 PM
#15
hotsauce_gm
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 0
Vote For Tate for Heisman!

http://promo.espn.go.com/espn/contests/theheismanvote/2009/

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:15 PM
#16
blueheron
blueheron's picture
Joined: 03/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2579
change of pace

It's fun to watch a coaching staff that can make changes in minutes (of game time) rather than over a half hour.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:18 PM
#17
formerlyanonymous
formerlyanonymous's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 38897
The question will become does

The question will become does RR use this formation only for zone read? Did we see him line Koger up like this and not run the read? Just asking. Don't want any Carr "this formation means we're running this play" like scenarios.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:22 PM
(Reply to #9) #18
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 7194
Isn't this the same formation

Isn't this the same formation on the Koger td? Instead of blocking the DE, Koger slips past him and Forcier hits him on the goal line as the DE and the scraping linebacker go to the qb.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:24 PM
(Reply to #9) #19
bsb2002
bsb2002's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 512
read this for your

read this for your answer
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Deconstructi...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:48 PM
(Reply to #9) #20
enlightenedbum
enlightenedbum's picture
Joined: 06/06/2009
MGoPoints: 19822
Pretty sure

We ran this exact play but turned it into an old school '97 era bootleg. And that was Koger's big run after catch play.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:25 PM
#21
acl
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 0
recievers blocking...

Remember how we used to say Michigan receivers were great blockers? If Stonum gets even a touch on his corner on this play, Minor is in the end zone. He's the only one on the offense that makes no effort here.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:43 PM
(Reply to #12) #22
baorao
baorao's picture
Joined: 08/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1075
yeah

that is kind of disappointing. although his reaction at the snap seems to be to fake like he is waiting for the bubble screen, which puts him a number of steps behind his defender. i don't know if that was intentional or not. in any event he still isn't running hard at any point on the play.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:49 PM
(Reply to #15) #23
pjmasi
Joined: 08/27/2009
MGoPoints: 98
I don't get it

I'm not sure what you expect him to have done. I mean, I agree he didn't run hard. But even if he did, you can't block from behind. You can't even block from the side most times without getting flagged. To help Minor, he'd have had to get to the other side of that corner. Unlikely.

I think maybe he could have sold the screen fake a little better. He went downfield too far, not sucking his guy up into the short screen play.

Other than that, I don't see this as Stonum's fault.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:00 PM
(Reply to #20) #24
baorao
baorao's picture
Joined: 08/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1075
which is why

I mentioned that he may have been selling a fake but I wasn't sure.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:20 PM
(Reply to #23) #25
pjmasi
Joined: 08/27/2009
MGoPoints: 98
Agreed there

His selling of the fake wasn't all-out. Even if it was, though, I think that corner just read the play properly and saved his team a TD. If he was just half a second more lazy, end zone.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:24 PM
(Reply to #27) #26
baorao
baorao's picture
Joined: 08/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1075
yeah

I can see that. that CB didn't really even attempt to engage him like the ones at the top of the screen.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:54 PM
(Reply to #15) #27
MLAWyer
MLAWyer's picture
Joined: 01/23/2009
MGoPoints: 19
Stonum

I can't speak to Stonum's responsibilities on this play specifically, but I have noticed he is not a particularly willing blocker. I don't mean to be negative, but I have noticed repeatedly that he does not give a real strong effort in this area.

It is particularly noticeable on kickoff returns - if Odoms receives the kick, Stonum jogs towards the wedge but never makes an effort to engage with anyone. I realize that blocking is not his primary responsibility on the return team, but when you compare his effort to what Odom does in the same situation, it's pretty disappointing. RR really emphasizes blocking skills for his receivers, so I suspect this is one of the reasons that the coaching staff has at times moved Savoy or Roundtree ahead of him on the depth chart - looking for a way to light a fire under him.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:45 PM
(Reply to #12) #28
Long Time Lurker
Joined: 12/16/2008
MGoPoints: 43
to me it look like stonum was

to me it look like stonum was an option on a long hand off, by the way he turns and squares his shoulders to the qb

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:49 PM
(Reply to #16) #29
Subrosa
Subrosa's picture
Joined: 08/16/2008
MGoPoints: 355
Right.

And it also looks to me from the way he peels back immediately at the snap that the CB had responsibility to get deep there. I don't think Stonum had an opportunity to block him at all on this play.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:26 PM
#30
leftrare
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1938
back side is what?

Go ahead everybody, neg me to death for the following.

I've really had a hard time understanding what "side" is what -- back, play, weak, strong.

I assume the offensive alignment dictates all of the above. My visually challenged brain is at least good enough to see that Michigan has more helmets to the right of the center/QB (5)than left (4) in this formation. So, if this formation is nominally "strong" right, then I would have thought that the "back" of the defensive formation would be opposed to the weak side of the O, but apparently, I'm wrong on that. Can somebody make this simple to my four-year old intelligence?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:47 PM
(Reply to #13) #31
baorao
baorao's picture
Joined: 08/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1075
could be wrong but this is how

i understand it.

play side = where the ball is going (aka where the holes are going to open up)

back side = where the play is moving away from

strong side = side of the formation where the TE lines up

weak side = no TE

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 2:24 PM
(Reply to #18) #32
spmancuso
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 24
this is right, plus

When the offense lines up in balanced formation, say two tight ends, a split end on each side, and one back, the "strong side" can't be determined by the # of people.

Most teams then use the rule that if the offense is balanced, the strong side is the wide side of the field.

The Strong Side is where the offense is strongest, either by having more blockers on that side or by having more of the field to run to. Different defenses have different rules.

The real fun begins when the offense is balanced AND the ball is in the middle of the field. Then the defense usually has no clear rule. That's why sometimes when the offense breaks the huddle the defense looks confused about where to line up.

Add to that how some teams flop their TE after the teams get lined up (change the Weak Side into the Strong Side) and the defensive plan becomes even trickier.

Why does this matter so much. Two reasons (1) Many defenses use strong/weak side players - like Stevie Brown being the Strong Side LB - so they have to figure it out each play in order to know where to line up, and (2) defenses are often designed to overplay to the strong side. Michigan vs. ND was "slanting" to the Strong Side in the first half. Obviously you have to determine which is the Strong Side for that to work out.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:50 PM
(Reply to #13) #33
ColoradoBlue
ColoradoBlue's picture
Joined: 09/14/2008
MGoPoints: 1198
It's a great question...

As I understand it, the strong side is simply the side with more hats, which is usually the side with a tight end (if one is employed). With 11 players, one side of the center will almost always be lopsided, even in a two tight-end set (a fullback or halfback will shade to one side or the other). The only real exception I can think of is a two-tight-end wishbone set.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 3:56 PM
(Reply to #36) #34
Dhani Bowtie
Dhani Bowtie's picture
Joined: 10/21/2008
MGoPoints: 99
Single back ace double te as

Single back ace double te as well

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:28 PM
#35
GCS
GCS's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 791
Inside/outside tell

I'm wondering if anybody else has noticed something I've seen that seems to be an indicator of which direction the running back will be going. On the play above, Forcier lines up a yard in front of Minor. This lead to the inside zone/dive/whatever you want to call it. On last week's picture pages, Forcier lined up a yard behind Brown. On that play, Brown faked the outside zone.

I've just been casually observing this, but it seems like you can guess inside/outside zone pre-snap by looking at the relative positioning of the quarterback and running back. Has anybody else seen this, and does this seem like something that can be exploited in the future (based on the above play, it looks like ND hasn't figured it out yet)?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:46 PM
#36
DamnYankee
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 548
Question - if the LB reads the drive block by Moosman and

comes up to plug the hole, does Tate then have the option to pull the ball and take it around the end? This would seem like the logical counter to the counter correct? If you look, the corner has already bailed and is heading after Minor, leaving at least 10 yds. of green if Tate were to keep it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 12:52 PM
(Reply to #17) #37
Maize_and_Drew
Maize_and_Drew's picture
Joined: 08/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1592
I love the

many, many different options this offense has.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:20 PM
(Reply to #21) #38
Hannibal.
Hannibal.'s picture
Joined: 09/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6297
Yup, me too. And just think,

Yup, me too. And just think, there's so much more that can be added. Like a two-back set with a triple option.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 5:22 PM
(Reply to #21) #39
Captain
Captain's picture
Joined: 06/12/2009
MGoPoints: 12438
I love having a quarterback

I love having a quarterback that can capitalize on those options.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:21 PM
(Reply to #17) #40
pjmasi
Joined: 08/27/2009
MGoPoints: 98
I think you're right

At first, I was going to say "I think this is only a pre-snap read for Tate. If they are in press coverage, if the safeties are cheating up again, it's a run play all the way."

Then I went back and watched a few more times. I think you have it right. The QB read on this play is not the blocked DE but the LB that Huyge is stepping out to block. If the LB was NOT in QB contain (crashed into the hole, like you said), Tate would have kept it for 6-7 yards, tackled by the far side corner's angle.

HOWEVA, that pulling corner leaves Odoms wide open on a wheel route. So Tate's read after keeping the ball is the safety. If the safety steps up to cover the run, then the wheel is wide open.

Wow. I love this.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 2:45 PM
(Reply to #25) #41
baleedat
baleedat's picture
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 272
wouldn't that put too many

wouldn't that put too many men down field? They are run blocking.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 5:12 PM
(Reply to #43) #42
pjmasi
Joined: 08/27/2009
MGoPoints: 98
Good point

Ummm...yeah you're probably right. In that case I guess Tate's stuck with a run then.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 9:46 PM
(Reply to #25) #43
kman23
kman23's picture
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 288
QB Read

If the DE on the side they don't block down on (so if the entire line goes left then the DE on that side (right end)) chases the RB there is no containment so the QB holds the ball and runs to that new openings. If the DE sits outside he takes himself out of the play and the QB hands it off.

If a team then brings down a LB, S, or nickel/dime CB to contain the QB (and the DE chases the RB) then MI throws 1. the bubble to the open slot WR 2. the TE on the counter breaks off the block and goes to the flat (TD by Koger against ND) or 3. If the outside CB moves down to cover the bubble then the outside WR is open for a flag/post/hitch, etc.

If people don't get this offense they need the following articles. The first one is an amazing article basically explaining the fundamentals of the Constraint Theory and the second one rips Tressel and shows how much more advanced our offense is.

http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2008/01/constraint-theory-of-offense.html

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Deconstructi...

the second one starting the paragraph above the U of M pic

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:06 PM
#44
SFBayAreaBlue
SFBayAreaBlue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3192
These

are the kind of offensive adjustments that made me really excited when richrod first got hired and I was watching old WVU games.

The level of depth and consistency of the plays and how they work off of each other and what the defense does, it's mind boggling.

I'm so glad that its beginning to show now that we've got slightly more experienced players. I already can't wait for next year and years beyond when we've got veterans all over the field.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:26 PM
#45
BlueBulls
BlueBulls's picture
Joined: 04/06/2009
MGoPoints: 133
Very encouraging

This goes along with what Brian had said last year: the coaches are adding wrinkles all the time, we just weren't ready for the next step in 2008.

This play is a great example of the progress of the team:

We've now countered their counter to our counter for their counter to our initial play.

I'm loving the Picture Pages series, and it's encouraging to see the team's progress in understanding the schemes of the coaches.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:30 PM
#46
harmon98
harmon98's picture
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 8274
lingo

the long handoff is effectively a hitch pass minus the hitch ergo hitchless pass

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:45 PM
#47
KBLOW
KBLOW's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 9759
That play looks freaking

That play looks freaking beautiful.

My memory is that we only used the I-formation at the 1 yd line. The second time we got that close (and scored a TD) we ran our plays out of the shot gun. ND seemed to know what to do against the I, but was clueless most of the day against our base set.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:49 PM
#48
West Texas Blue
West Texas Blue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1843
Hmm, really thought on that

Hmm, really thought on that play that Minor should have gotten in the endzone. Maybe his ankle still isn't 100%? Great adjustment by Rich Rod to beat the scrape.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 1:57 PM
#49
Jivas
Jivas's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 2358
eh

Mike DeBord is not impressed. He just ran another zone stretch on 3rd-and-1.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 2:57 PM
#50
Noah
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 111
Thank you for the picture

Thank you for the picture pages series! This is really helping me understand how the scrape and its counters work. It's a little tricky for me to wrap my head around all of the options contained in this offense.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
September 17th, 2009 at 7:11 PM
#51
NoHeartAnthony
Joined: 08/31/2009
MGoPoints: 262
The triple option counter to the scrape

Is the triple option, where Forcier keeps it and the pitch option on the backside an effective counter to the scrape also? I remember RR would run that at WV with Schmitt being the first option, then Slaton being the pitch man. Is it less effective countering the scrape than the H-back or do you think it's part of the "30%" that hasn't been implemented yet?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.