Penn State Postgame Presser: Jim Harbaugh Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

37845058201_319671450c_z

[Upchurch]

You’ve been around a while. Have you seen a more diverse offense than that in your experience that gave you more challenges and little quirks and had to worry about more aspects of it?

“Yeah, thought their offense played extremely well. Understatement. They were hitting on all cylinders. The back is really good, as advertised, and the quarterback, McSorley, played extremely well. Yeah, they were hitting on all cylinders. Quarterback was hot and receivers made plays downfield and it was impressive.”

The way Penn State jumped out like that, did they hit you guys with some things—the Barkley direct snap, stuff like that where they popped you—that you guys didn’t expect?

“Yeah, I mean, they hit us on quite a few plays that we’ve defensed well this year and I thought their execution was really good tonight right from the beginning. Then we got it a little bit under control and then they came back and hit the quarterback sucker play, hit the inside fade, downfield balls, really good throws, well played by the receivers, et cetera. As I said, it was a good performance.”

After the first five minutes it was like an avalanche but your team was able to answer and get one point away from them and then it went away from them. Explain how you saw the flow of the game and why that was.

“Eh, it’s just—the flow of the game, I think everybody saw the flow of the game. Thought they were really executing well and we had our difficulties scoring, moving the ball, and getting them stopped.”

Fans will want to extrapolate more than just this game to the importance of this game but I’m assuming you don’t buy into that for recruiting and all the other reasons but I don’t know. Does a game like this have impact more than one game or is it just a game?

“I don’t know either. We’re going to regroup, we’re gonna refit, retool, and get back to work. More opportunities ahead of us.”

Seven sacks Penn State had defensively. Did they do anything systematically to surprise you?

“No. They did a nice job on the edge. They beat us on the edge multiple times.”

With two losses in the Big Ten it certainly seems to be problematic whether or not you can—what do you lean on going forward because the defense has been something you’ve leaned on and it got picked apart by a good team today, the offense still seems to be—what do you lean on with your team going forward? What do you hope is the strength of this team going forward?

“We endure and be better. We’re gonna regroup and come back.”

John said something about how after the game they got told there’s no more bandwagon, fake love’s gone, it’s just on you guys now. What does that mean when you say something like that? How do you solve this, I suppose?

“I mean, they’re our team. We solve it with our team. Nobody else can help us but us. We put our best people on it, our players and our coaches.”

Can it be solvable this season? You’re seven games into the season; can it be solvable this season?

“Yes.”

Comments

1VaBlue1

October 22nd, 2017 at 5:42 PM ^

Another front runner speaks!  No, the team's problem's are not a fan issue (unless you let it be, Mr Fan), it's a leaning issue.  If you thought any corner was turned simply because someone was hired, you're a fucking idiot.

Corners get turned through learning, experience, and talent.  The team is learning, but it lacks experience and talent at some key positions.  Two out of three is a losing equation.  Before the season started, people expected ~3 losses for this team.  Looks like it might be more?  

Aside from all of this, if you want to equate Harbaugh's teams with Hoke and Rich Rod teams, you're a fucking idiot.

RobSk

October 23rd, 2017 at 9:05 AM ^

that believed that hiring literally any coach would result in never having another tough, painful  loss was just not thinking straight.

IMO, Harbaugh has done so far what I expected - He's got Michigan back beating the overwhelming majority of the teams they should beat. As of last year, I was pretty confident this year would be tough in terms of beating other top big 10 teams. Beating Florida misled me for a while into thinking our defense was top-notch. It's obviously good, but not good enough to win games against top opponents in the absence of a good offense.

My original expectations were that by year 4, we'd have a Harbaugh QB in place, with a rebuilt offensive line, and a good to excellent defense. I do think the defense will be excellent next year, even against top opponents (like last year). It's less clear the QB problems will be solved, but as discussions had it early in Harbaughs time here, they will have several bullets in the chamber for QB next year.

Maybe I'm just a slappie, but I thought this year was going to be tough on both sides of the ball, and while I'm very disappointed about the MSU game, the Penn State game was roughly what I expected at the beginning of the year. I think the score looked a bit worse than it was because of the necessity to go for it on 4th down in the 4th quarter, but I didn't see how we would be close to Penn State at their place with (as I saw it) Speight at QB and a young o-line/WR and a very young defense.

         Rob

Casanova

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:11 PM ^

I think that’s the most disappointing part of this season. We need a serviceable line to have any chance of QB development. Also the coaches should revisit our route tree. They aren’t helping our line with long developing plays.

M-Dog

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:13 PM ^

I don't care if we lose every game until then, everything from here on out should be centered around one and only one thing: 

Beat Ohio State at home.

That's all that matters now.

Penn State was ugly, but there are some lessons to take away from it in preparing for Ohio State.

BornSinner

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:00 PM ^

Enough with this every game is equal bullshit. It’s not fucking true. MSU and OSU are way more important than anything else on the schedule. This fan base wouldn’t be in a tailspin if we lost to Florida over MSU. That MSU loss screwed up everything. The fact that we care that much about it means inherently that rivalry games like MSU and OSU mean more. Who cares about Rutgers. Beat OSU.

M-Dog

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:22 PM ^

I won't remember if we win or lose against Wisconsin three days after it happens.

But I still remember beating Ohio State and knocking them out of the championship hunt 20+ years ago.  Those were glorious seasons in my mind.

They were also 4 loss seasons. 

But that's not what mattered.

 

 

 

 

In reply to by 303john

BroadneckBlue21

October 22nd, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^

Then you guys need to check why you watch the game, if you do t care if Leaders and Best actually does anything outside of beating OSU and MSU. Those are not the defining issue moments of every season unless he team sucks and beats those teams as upsets. I remember 20 years ago: UM expected to beat rivals and everyone else. To act like any loss is okay is sad. Especially, beating OSU would mean our team is NC caliber, so losing other games is infuriating. Who in the hell wants to surprise win? Fee gosh sakes, it is about more than just the rivals.

In reply to by 303john

BroadneckBlue21

October 22nd, 2017 at 3:54 PM ^

Then you guys need to check why you watch the game, if you do t care if Leaders and Best actually does anything outside of beating OSU and MSU. Those are not the defining issue moments of every season unless he team sucks and beats those teams as upsets. I remember 20 years ago: UM expected to beat rivals and everyone else. To act like any loss is okay is sad. Especially, beating OSU would mean our team is NC caliber, so losing other games is infuriating. Who in the hell wants to surprise win? Fer gosh sakes, it is about more than just the rivals.

flashOverride

October 22nd, 2017 at 9:47 PM ^

Absolutely, thank you. If last night had been the first loss of the season, even if by the same score, people would grumble but deal with it. Losing to Michigan State has put people in an unreasonable state. And I say this as someone who fucking hates losing to MSU. It's long been said that beating Ohio State is more enjoyable than beating Michigan State, but losing to MSU sucks far more, and it's completely true. OSU fans are mere mouth-breathing idiots, MSU fans are virulent douchebags with massive inferiority complexes. If you have to be around OSU fans after losing to them, they're going to rub it in your face but won't begrudge your fanhood as long as they won. When MSU wins, their fans act like Michigan fans don't have a right to exist. We thought the misery was going to be over and it's not, and people are pissed about it. I know it totally sucks, but we need to calm down. 

1VaBlue1

October 22nd, 2017 at 5:55 PM ^

Huh?  The read option?  Nope...  OSU runs RPO - run-pass options, not a read option run.  Sure, they'll run those, so does MIchigan, but its not thier offense staple.  Also, OSU doesn't have a downfield passing game that scares anyone, and they don't pick a WR based on who's covering him.  Barrett can't do any of that!  McSorely is such a better QB than Barrett it's not even funny.  He executed reads and passes I didn't think he could do last night, but he did it well - much better than that crap we saw last year.  Barrett doesn't have that game - he doesn't scare anyone with his passing.  He scares the shit out of people with his running, though...

Amaznbluedoc

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:14 PM ^

Actually, I was impressed at how JH handled himself after the loss.  The media has gone off the rails and if one looks at the irrational talk in the Freep...  perhaps it is the reality of a 24/7 news cycle or an increasingly impatient fan base?  Look, this is CFB and with the decline in the number of kids playing ball, increasing media exposure, and the difficulty landing stellar recruits, the playing field has really changed.  It is increasingly difficult to establish and sustain a dominant national power house programs than in years past.  There are plenty of formerly dominant teams who are now ghost programs including Texas, Nebraska, etc.  We're in much better shape than any of those places and have to deal with the new reality of the more cyclic nature of CFB.

SpikeFan2016

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:22 PM ^

The O'Korn/Harbaugh line about "fake love" reeks of a Brandon/Hoke stench. 

 

You just lost by 29 points and you're preemptively blaming the fans????? I cannot picture Urban, James or Mark ever saying something so ridiculous. 

PopeLando

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:31 PM ^

Whoa there. You can make your point - that he misunderstood O'Korn's comment - without the vitriol. This isn't mLive or YouTube. Let's keep it civil. Or, at least, employ your sarcastic wit.

dipshit moron

October 22nd, 2017 at 3:35 PM ^

thanks for keeping everyone in line. but i am a little confused. this is the same blog where players are called"trash" and all the coaches suck and should be fired, right? are you keeping all those people in line to? it isnt up to you how i express my opinion , so shut the f*** up!

Reader71

October 23rd, 2017 at 11:27 AM ^

They’re not blaming the fans, and that’s a very uncharitable and illogical interpretation. It’s very clearly a way to rally the team, place them in an us-against-the-world mentality, and hope that can help provide some spark. Dantonio built a pretty good program on that principle. Don’t be so sensitive and — dare I say it — fickle.