Opponent Watch 2015: Week 5 Comment Count

BiSB

Hey, I’m back. Sorry I missed last week. I tried to call, but it kept going straight to voicemail, and I didn’t want to leave a message because I figured I’d just see you Tuesday at the thing.

About Last Week:

Turtle

The Road Ahead:

#13 Northwestern (5-0, 1-0 B1G)

Last week: Beat Ball State 24-19, Beat Minnesota 27-0

Recap: Northwestern is a thing. Probably.

They’re 5-0, they’re ranked in the top 15 for the first time 2001. They’ve given up the fewest points per game in the country (unless you’re just talking about points surrendered by the defense, in which case Michigan has the best scoring defense). They’re only giving up 4.0 yards per pass attempt, and have yet to surrender a 200 yard passing day to anyone.

But at the same time, the algorithms don’t like them very much (they’re #29 in the S&P+) and Vegas doesn’t trust them (they opened +12 against Michigan, which has since moved to about +8). And the reason is pretty obvious. They haven’t scored more than 24 points against any FBS opponents, and they’re #116 in the country in yards per play and #119 in passing yards per game.

Still, Northwestern remains a team about which we don’t know a lot, other than “defense good, offense bad.” Case in point: Northwestern bludgeoned Minnesota 27-0, which looks like a score indicative of an all-three-phases performance. But 14 of those points came on a fumble return for a touchdown and a punt return to the 5 yard line. Northwestern held Minnesota under 200 yards, but barely cracked 300 yards themselves.

This team is as frightening as: The upper end of the thing MInnesota was supposed to be. Fear Level = 7

Michigan should worry about: Northwestern is second in the conference in pretty much every major defensive category.

Michigan can sleep soundly about: They are second to Michigan in pretty much every major defensive category

When they play Michigan: Northwestern is what is known as a “fleet in being.” The problem isn’t that Northwestern is necessarily a good team. It that they are potentially a good team. Michigan plays Northwestern immediately before Michigan State, and I’m sure Harbaugh would prefer to treat this game much like they did UNLV; throw rock the whole time, not show anything interesting, and maybe set up the next opponent for a couple of counterpunches. But Northwestern looks real enough to have to take as a potentially serious game, thus losing the opportunity to play for the next move.

This week: @ #18 Michigan, 3:30, BTN

[AFTER THE JUMP: Monty Python, Kevin Bacon, and a rock]

#4 Michigan State (5-0, 1-0 B1G)

Last week: Beat Central Michigan 30-10, Beat Purdue 24-21

Recap: The universe is a bizarre place sometimes. Michigan State spent years banging the disrespect drum louder and longer than was previously thought possible, and often justifiably. Their end-of-season rankings in the last couple of seasons made pretty clear that they probably should have been ranked higher throughout the season. So when undefeated Michigan State dropped in both the AP and Coaches Polls after another victory, their fans reacted with a bombastic chorus of, “eh, that seems right.”

Michigan State is 0-5 against the spread this year. Every single game they’ve played has been at least interesting in the fourth quarter, despite playing two MAC teams, Air Force, and an “And I Have Cable” Big Ten team.

This team is as frightening as: A thing that you KNOW should frighten you, but doesn’t. Which is pretty frightening. Fear Level = 8

Michigan should worry about: State’s defense has issues in the secondary, but they remain very stout up front. The latter is more important to stop Michigan, except when it comes to Montae Nicholson’s Continuing Adventures in Tackling Trigonometry.

Michigan can sleep soundly about: Compare the following defenses:

 

Team A

Team B

Yards allowed

1019

920

Yards per play allowed

3.28

3.10

Rushing YPC allowed

1.97

2.32

Passing YPA allowed

4.22

3.94

Points per game allowed

13.4

7.6

They’re pretty close, but you’d probably give a slight edge to Team B, yes? Well, that’s good. Because Team B is, in fact, Michigan. And Team A is Michigan State through five games.

2013 Michigan State.

When they play Michigan: I will not get too optimistic I will not get too optimistic I will not get too optimistic. Vegas help a brother would… DAMMIT Vegas that isn’t helping.

This week: @ Rutgers, 8:00 p.m., BTN

Minnesota (3-2, 0-1 B1G)

Last week: Beat Ohio (YTO) 27-24, Lost at Northwestern 27-0

Recap: No offense, Goldie, but I think we’ve found a more fitting mascot.

They wear brownish garments, wander around slowly and aimlessly, and repeatedly bash themselves in the head. The bashing seems to be intentional, but it is unclear how the bashing is intended to bring about the desired result.

Minnesota is trending in a very poor direction. A six point loss to TCU is a pretty good result. Three three-point losses to Colorado State, Kent State, and Ohio are not good results. Losing 27-0 to Northwestern (even if Northwestern is good) is what we call a “red flag.” Their longest drive against Northwestern was 37 yards. The culprit, surprisingly, hasn’t been their Vietnam-era passing game, but rather the running game. They are down more than a yard per carry compared to last year (4.68 to 3.66) and 75 yards per game total (215 to 141).

Mitch Leidner was so bad in this one that they finally ripped a redshirt off of true freshman Demry Croft, a Freshman-Caris-LeVert-esque 6’5” 200 pounder with a couple of MAC offers. Croft proceeded to go 5 of 11 for 27 yards.

This team is as frightening as: An actual gopher. Fear Level = 4

Michigan should worry about: An evening Halloween game is gonna have so damn many puns from the announcers. At least it isn’t on the Big Ten Network?

Michigan can sleep soundly about: Minnesota probably won’t, um, score.

When they play Michigan: The word “slog” comes to mind. As do the words “trek,” “grind,” and “trudge.”

This week: @ Purdue, 3:30 P.M., ESPN

Rutgers (2-2, 0-1 B1G)

Last week: Beat Kansas 27-14, Bye

Recap: Easily Rutgers’ two best weeks of the year. First they handily defeated Kansas, who is a real live team with uniforms and pads and a stadium-shaped building and everything. They then went the entire bye week without having anyone arrested, publicly embarrassed, or otherwise pulling a Rutgers.

Baby steps, gentlemen. Baby steps.

This team is as frightening as: A formulaic1986 horror movie about a killer hitchhiker, starring Jennifer Jason Leigh.

The Hitcher

Sorry, that was literally the first Google Image Search result for ‘Rutgers is scary.' Fear Level = 61% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Michigan should worry about: Getting picked up and slammed into the concrete by someone twice your size.

Michigan can sleep soundly about: Apparently being picked up and slammed into the concrete by someone twice your size is apparently not that bad after all.

When they play Michigan: Michigan will win.

This week: vs. #4 Michigan State, 8:00 p.m., BTN

Indiana (4-1, 0-1 B1G)

Last week: Won at Wake Forest 31-24, Lost to Ohio State 34-27

Recap: Is a Pyrrhic Moral Victory a thing? Because if not, it is now.

Indiana didn’t just hang with Ohio State. They frankly outplayed Ohio State for much of this game. They jumped out to a 10-0 lead in the first half, and still had a four point lead late in the third quarter when Zeke Elliott converted a 4th and 1 from its own 35… into a 65 yard touchdown. In fact, Elliot threw three Tyson-style haymakers in this one, and Indiana kept coming back. They didn’t skip a beat when Jordan Howard rolled an ankle, and barely flinched when Nate Sudfeld rolled an ankle and Zander Diamont had to reprise his role as “so, that guy is our quarterback I guess.” And Indiana had a first and goal from the five with a chance to tie (or go for two and the win), but alas, it was not to be.

The problem for Indiana now is that if Sudfeld and Howard are out for anything approaching the long term, and without Darius Latham, Indiana’s prospects are almost back where they were before the unexpected 4-0 start. They have a relatively easy remaining schedule (they still have Rutgers, Maryland, Penn State, and Purdue), but while 6 or 7 wins are possible, the prospects of a Dream-by-Indiana-Standards Season very much rely on the word from the training room.

This team is as frightening as: #CHAOSTEAM. Fear Level = 5 +/- 3.5

Michigan can sleep soundly about: This guy might be quarterbacking Indiana:

Zander

Michigan should worry about: That guy is also THIS guy:

Stogie Zander

Somehow the latter seems much better at football. And stealin’ yo girl.

When they play Michigan: The game will be decidedly less interesting than it could have been if like ONE DAMN BREAK had gone Indiana’s way last week.

This week: @ Penn State, noon, ESPN2

Penn State (4-1, 1-0 B1G)

Last week: Beat San Diego State 37-21, Beat Army 20-14

Recap: Penn State is 4-1, which would say a lot more if Penn State hadn’t racked up those four wins against the teams ranked #91, #92, #105, and #110 in S&P+. This week’s rendition of A Win Is A Win I Guess was a 20-14 barn-burner in which they were outgained by Army. And while normally defeating the U.S. Army is an impressive feat, Army is the weakest of the service academy teams from a football standpoint, and they are extremely undersized on both sides of the ball. After surrendering 445 yards to Fordham, 415 yards to UConn, 340 yards to Wake Forrest and 473 (!) yards to Eastern Michigan, Army held Penn State to 264 yards.

This team is as frightening as: Same as it ever was.

Rock

Fear Level = 3.5

Michigan should worry about: This is going to be a cold, miserable defensive facemasher of a game in which one big score could be enough, and given James Franklin’s tactical and strategic genius…

Michigan can sleep soundly about:

clip_image001

Yeah, scratch that.

When they play Michigan: See also: "When they play Minnesota"

This week: vs. Indiana, noon, ESPN2

#1 Ohio State (5-0, 1-0 B1G)

Last week: Beat Western Michigan 38-12, Won at Indiana, 34-27

Recap:

I wish I could provide some insightful snark here, but honestly I can’t explain this one. Cardale Jones has been bad but not apocalyptic. They have talent out the wazoo at all of the skill positions. They returned everyone from an offensive line that was kick-ass last year. The defense remains really good. So what the hell is the problem?

You want to know what this feels like? It feels like Charlie Weis’s Notre Dame teams. By all objective measures, this should be a juggernaut. But then they try to put everything together, and the damn thing just doesn’t work right. Odds are, they figure it out and come into the game undefeated and playing good football. But at this point, they just aren’t playing that well.

This team is as frightening as: Unreasonable optimism.

Fear Level = 9

Michigan should worry about: It’s The Game, and crazy shit happens in The Game.

Michigan can sleep soundly about: It’s The Game, and crazy shit happens in The Game.

When they play Michigan: Crazy shit will almost certainly happen.

This week: vs. Maryland, noon, BTN

Objects in the Rearview Mirror

#5 Utah (4-0, 1-0 PAC-12)

Last week: Won at Oregon 62-20, Bye

Recap: They’re coming off a bye, but we didn’t talk about their win over Oregon yet, which… HOLY GENITALS, BATMAN. Oregon ain’t what it used to be, but this was still at Autzen at night, and they absolutely demolished the Ducks. I mean…

clip_image003

That’s a choo-choo train right there. Meanwhile, Oregon’s points came on one real drive, one 11-yard drive following a punt return, and a garbage time drive against Utah’s sixth string. To slice Utah’s lead to 42 in the last two minutes of the game.

It’s hard to say whether Utah’s win did more help to Michigan or harm to Michigan State, but all in all it was quite enjoyable. Now Gameday is going to be in Salt Lake City for Utah/Cal this week, which falls deep into Sign of the Apocalypse territory.

This week: vs. #23 Cal, 10:00 p.m., ESPN

Oregon State (2-2, 0-1 PAC-12)

Last week: Lost to Stanford 42-24, Bye

Recap: Respectability, part one. Oregon State held its own against Stanford through the first half, and were still somewhat in the game in the fourth quarter. They currently sit at #65 in the S&P+, roughly in the upper-middle-class MAC team/underwhelming but potentially viable P5 team category. Against most odds, bowl eligibility is not out of the question for the Beavers.

This week: @ Arizona, 4:00 p.m., FS1

UNLV (2-3, 1-0 MWC)

Last week: Beat Idaho State 80-8, won at Nevada 23-17

Recap: Respectability, part two. Neither a demolition of the Idaho State Potato Hawks nor a win at bottomfeeder Nevada is the stuff of legend, each is decidedly better than the alternative. According to the algorithm people, Michigan’s win over UNLV is better than every single win on Penn State’s resume.

They’re still bad, but not THAT bad.

This week: vs. San Jose State, 9:00 p.m., no TV because obvious.

BYU (3-2)

Last week: Lost at Michigan 658-(-3), Beat UConn 30-13

Recap: BYU’s win over UConn wasn’t as close as it appears, despite being much much closer than it appears. They outgained UConn 539-230 and Tanner Mangum threw for 365 yards, but somehow UConn was within a touchdown midway through the 4th quarter before BYU pulled away with a couple of late scores. Hell, this was the stat line at halftime of a tie game:

clip_image004

Football is dumb and makes no sense sometimes.

This week: vs. East Carolina, 7:30 p.m., ESPNU

Comments

ScruffyTheJanitor

October 8th, 2015 at 12:48 PM ^

So in highschool, I went for a run at a local state park, and in the process of it I stumbled on what I can only assume was the great groundhog summit of that year.

I mean, there were like 12 Groundhogs sitting in perfect circle at a cross roads.  I stopped in my tracks when I noticed them (I tend to zone out when I was running). They all paused for a second, glaring in my direction. I was scared beyond reason that I was going to gert massacred by the Groundhog World Order summit or what ever the hell it was. They all took off in seperate directions, save for one smaller Groundhog (think the Joe Pesci of the group), who glared at me as I slowly and cautiously walked by. 

To this day, I am convinced that I stopped the Great Groundhog invasion. Notice how you haven't been invaded by groundhogs? You're welcome.

So, since Gophers and groundhogs are similar-ish, I'd totally buy a single gopher being fear level 4.

BigBrotherBlue

October 8th, 2015 at 1:34 PM ^

Let me be the first to thank you for your service to our country. Without brave citizens like you willing to tiptoe past imposing 2-foot long rodents... I shudder to think what such a world would be like. (Don't they give out medals for for things like this? I'm writing my congressman right after I check for suspicious ground holes under my shed).

BigBrotherBlue

October 8th, 2015 at 5:18 PM ^

No man, you misunderstood. I just finished my congressional letter of recommendation for a you to receive a medal, our at the very least rename a sand hill after you. (truth is, 50% of us wish we could have been walking beside ya, 35% wanted to watch but only from a distance, and the remaining 15% immediately ran to lock the slider going out to the backyard)

The FannMan

October 8th, 2015 at 1:01 PM ^

BiSB is a Golden Retriever who likes to wear Michigan clothes.  Now, I know what you are thinking.  A Golden kills a gopher.  You are probably right.  But, the gopher my bite him or various gopher parts that are eaten may give BiSB a sick tummy.  So, who cares, right?  Here is the thing - BiSB now has to go to - wait for it - THE VET!  This is, of course, terrifying.  So a fear level of 4 makes perfect sense.

spigmoni

October 8th, 2015 at 12:36 PM ^

Very interesting seeing the Column A / Column B comparing what pundits objectively called an elite defense in 2013 Michigan State to this year's Michigan squad.  Have seen many attempts at comparing Michigan's 2006 defense and possibly 97 squad, but this was a very interesting stat line comparing a very recent rose bowl winning team.  I know Michigan fans have tried to find things to complain about week to week, but really this year's defense passes both the eye test as an elite unit as well as all the algorithms and stat lines.  

I'm pumping the brakes on expectations until we get through these next 2 weeks unscathed, but boy do I think it's going to be a fun ride.  Enjoy the ride folks, this defense is going to be fun to watch and should keep us in every game this year barring injuries (knock on wood).  Now lets see if our offense starts clicking, that'll be the ceiling.  

alum96

October 8th, 2015 at 12:56 PM ^

Thats 2013 MSU not 2015.  Lots of similarities thru 5 weeks of the 2 teams on offense AND defense - OL coming off a mediocre year to improve in current year, running game finding itself but not great (they started with riley bullough until they found langford), and both teams QB play "challenged" ( they challenged btw 3 QBs until deciding on cook vs ND, us challenged with 1 QB).  Obviously the difference is their offense found many answers as the season went by as Cook and Langford found higher ceilings.   Maybe the health of Johnson gives us a higher ceiling in the running game but not sure rudock has much head room to go.  Cook had massive games in both the Big 10C game and rose bowl - things I dont see rudock currently capable of. 

This is why I am a bit down on rudock - a Cook 2013 QB (which is not a great QB) could have this team doing special things with this defense.

I am going to go take a look at the 1st 5 opponents offensive stats of MSU 2013 to see how they look.  To be fair we've played 3 really bad offenses and 2 decent ones.  Not sure if MSU played anyone that good either though early in the year - ND was good that year on offense but nothing special.

Totally unrelated, in making it a greater week for rutgers, Carroo was reinstated.  They still will suck horribly.

spigmoni

October 8th, 2015 at 12:47 PM ^

Sorry to piggyback off this comment again.  For all the people tempering expectations thus far on the elite level of our defense based on our opponents...  Check out who Michigan State beat 5 games during their elite d 2013 squad.

W vs 1-11 W. Michigan

W vs 2-10 S. Florida

W vs 8-4 (Div. 1 FCS team) Youngstown State

L vs 9-4 Notre Dame 

W vs 8-5 Iowa  (an Iowa team that our 7 win 2013 Michigan beat)

alum96

October 8th, 2015 at 12:55 PM ^

Its more than a fair point.

To that end S&P+ offense stats of those 5 opponents for all of 2013 were:

  • WMU: #120
  • S. Florida: #118
  • YSU - not in FBS
  • ND: #27
  • Iowa: #70

Ave: #84

So while we have not played great offenses we've actually on average played better offenses than MSU started that year with:

  • Utah #30
  • OSU: #83
  • UNLV: #98
  • BYU: #46
  • Maryland: #104

Ave: #77

Lewis =  2013 Dennard.  Stribling = 2013 Waynes????

OMG YOU GUYS - rose bowl!

 

 

Asgardian

October 8th, 2015 at 1:33 PM ^

http://mgoblog.com/diaries/comparing-our-2015-defense

That 2013 MSU team played its best football later on in the year.  

They actually rolled through a stretch of Big 10 play without giving up a touchdown in five out of six games (Purdue=0, Illinois=3, Michigan=6 /flinch, Nebraska=28, Northwestern=6, Minnesota=3).

This was peak "Big Ten!" on the Mgopodcast as I recall just due to the absolutely pathetic offense that was being played.

alum96

October 8th, 2015 at 2:17 PM ^

Bad Big 10 offenses have been a staple of the Big 10 for a decade now.  Its hard to label 2013 peak Big 10 - its bad almost every year.  Hell we should thank Indiana for its emergence because its usually one of the few top 50 offenses this conf can produce.

Wisc is having a down year so thats another bad offense to add to the litany - usually they are top 40.  MSU is also below where most thought they were. PSU remains crap.  UM is still mediocre.

Only Iowa is sort of outperforming - and thats only because you expect them to be bottom 30 every year.   And Neb statistically although any offense run by Tommy Armpunt is one I don't trust.

But I do agree UM will need to be holding multiple Big 10 teams to 10 or below to match that MSU team's D mid year.  Its very plausible with NW, Minn,PSU, and rutgers.  And Maryland already in the bag.

The FannMan

October 8th, 2015 at 12:54 PM ^

Is Idaho State one of these teams that always go for two?  From my exhaustive 30 second of internet research, they were down 35 to 0, scored a TD and went for two.  They got it.  Then UNLV ran off 45 points. 

Maybe kicking the extra point and begging for mercy would have been a better move?

MI Expat NY

October 8th, 2015 at 1:05 PM ^

UNLV might actually be bowl eligible by the end of the year, and presumably make a bowl because at last count there are roughly 2,000 bowl games.  They have games remaining with SJSU, @Fresno, Hawaii, SDSU, and @Wyoming.  Collectively, those opponents are 7-18 with only 3 FBS wins, two of which are over Fresno.  Hell, UNLV could very reasonably win their division.  

go16blue

October 8th, 2015 at 1:12 PM ^

I feel like people are really underestimating NW around here. Why the overconfidence? They're the only team in the country who has allowed fewer points than us, to similar competition. They absolutely shut down Stanford at the beginning of the year, who has since been absolutely rolling and is on offense what we want to be, but are not. I mean, their offense doesn't scare me, but how do we expect to move the ball on these guys? Certainly it won't be as easy of a game as people are making it out to be, no?

Rabbit21

October 8th, 2015 at 1:56 PM ^

It's just hard to trust that Northwestern's front seven has the size to hold up the pounding that is coming their way.  The Stanford game was impressive, but I can't shake the feeling part of it was due to Kevin Hogan experiencing one of his Dr. Jekyll games(he has since been Mr. Hyde).

Plus Northwestern's offense looks containable.  Perhaps not the best recipe for confidence, but it's extant.  All that said, I am worried about the game and hope the offense finds some punch, because if it comes down to something crazy happening at the end of the game, let's be honest, Northwestern is owed one.

spigmoni

October 8th, 2015 at 2:01 PM ^

THIS.  Watching them they really look like a good defense sideline to sideline.  They are smaller and quicker as a result of recruiting but are coached well.  I think there is a deficiency in size though and we will attack (at least initially) between the tackles to open up whatever Harbaugh has up his sleeve.  But the best way to attack smaller sideline to sideline teams is right up teh gut.  Attack that star LB they have.  

NW's offense spreads you out and attempts to run.  I have no fear of their offense against our defense.  In the years past and even our 2006 defense, I may be more afraid of the spread.  But our strengths are our DLINE and secondary, and our nickel/dime package has been good to great.  

Agreed, i hope it doesn't come down to the wire.  If so, I will be terrified as Rabbit21 is right, they do have some last minute karma on that.  

Jonesy

October 9th, 2015 at 5:59 PM ^

Maryland had a horrid d-line and we couldnt run on them up the middle either, couldn't do much of anything against that line besides a jet sweep and a screen.  Can't imagine NW is worse, our offense is awful, this game will be determined by turnoverse, special teams, and/or a random big play.  Or Vitale is just going to own our linebackers as theyre terrible at covering good players and he's their best.  This game looks like a toss-up.

spigmoni

October 8th, 2015 at 1:56 PM ^

I'm not sure there are a lot of people blatantly overestimating NW here.  Cautiously optimistic maybe.  You're right it'll be the best defense we've faced thus far and it may be a punt fest.  We're just taking stock in the idea that our defense is elite and regardless of opponent, we will be in the game.  Now will Jake Rudock be able to throw vs NW?  Confidence level is low.  But I have more confidence in our run offense than their offense, and thats saying something considering the level of our offensive play so far.  If turnovers give them points due to field position, and Rudock needs to win us the game?  Then things will be terrifying a bit...but,  I just don't think we get to that spot, I believe it'll be a game of field position and run offense.  

gwkrlghl

October 8th, 2015 at 1:15 PM ^

So there's definitely a number of teams on the schedule that I feel reasonably confident will not score more than 10 points. Northwestern, Minnesota, and Penn State all suck on offense. Rutgers and MSU don't seem to far ahead either. Can't wait to see the D get a shot at these teams. First to 10 points wins

Blueeeeeeeee2010

October 8th, 2015 at 1:20 PM ^

Knowing how good Oregon is would really help in giving me an idea about us, MSU, Utah AND Northwestern.  If it turns out the Ducks just aren't that good then our loss to Utah is less ok and means Stanford was the toughest competition either UM or NU had.  Transitive property doesn't necessarily apply in college football but what else is there to go on before the game?  It'd be nice to have a little more clarity going in to this big game, but the surprise is fine too.  Got my ticket and can't wait!

MaizeJacket

October 8th, 2015 at 1:33 PM ^

Little bit of Michigan Arrogance right there.  They made Stanford look like a bunch of elementary school playground kids, then Stanford made Southern Cal look the same.  Northwestern will be a very tough game.

Bottomfeeder Nevada? They are a perennial bowl team.  Not a bottomfeeder by any means.