I thought during the season preview you had the rock on flat ground....except we were now running toward's the rock?
Opponent Recap: Illinois
- Arkansas State, 33-15 (W)
- South Dakota State, 56-3 (W)
- No. 22 Arizona State, 17-14 (W)
- Western Michigan, 23-20 (W)
- Northwestern, 38-35 (W)
- @ Indiana, 41-20 (W)
- Ohio State, 7-17 (L)
- @ Purdue, 14-21 (L)
- @ No. 19 Penn State, 7-10 (L)
- No. 24 Michigan, 14-31 (L)
- No. 17 Wisconsin, 17-28 (L)
- @ Minnesota, 7-27 (L)
- UCLA, 20-14 (W), Emerald Bowl
Record: 7-6 overall, 2-6 B1G, 5th place Woody Division
|Rush:||171.7 ypg, 41st||123.8 ypg, 25th|
|Pass:||184.0 ypg, 91st||162.3 ypg, 3rd|
|Total:||355.7 ypg, 85th||286.2 ypg, 7th|
|Scoring:||22.6 ppg, 91st||19.6 ppg, 15th|
|T/O Margin:||-6, 95th|
Recap: Ron Zook’s last season at Illinois was the mirror image of Rich Rod’s last season at Michigan. Instead of a stellar offense trying to keep pace with a defense that kept giving up free touchdowns, it was a stellar defense trying to hold up long enough for the offense to maybe fall forward into field goal range.
The offense wasn’t that horrible at the beginning of the season. At least, it wasn’t supposed to be. The Illini returned QB Nathan Scheelhaase, who had a breakout freshman season of sorts in 2010. They lost RB Mikel Leshoure to the Lions, for whom he couldn’t play because he tore his Achilles tendon (but hey, who’s bitter about that), but they had seemingly quality options behind him in Jason Ford and Troy Pollard. At receiver they had a quality deep threat in A.J. Jenkins, who finished 6th in the Big Ten in yardage the previous season.
Scheelhaase, Ford, Jenkins
(more after the jump)
So that was dandy. Illinois’ offense was fine for their first several games. They averaged around 200 ypg rushing and almost started a Heisman campaign for Jenkins. The only warning signs came against Western Michigan, whom they struggled to beat, but at the time most people chalked it up to an Arizona State hangover. By the time they started their Big Ten schedule, they seemed to have found their rhythm and built a good deal of momentum after coming from behind to beat Northwestern and going nuts against Indiana the following week.
Then something horrible happened. A flailing Ohio State squad came to town, completed one pass the entire day, and left with an improbable victory. It wasn't that the Illini defense was bad -- both Buckeyes touchdowns came from offensive turnovers. Illinois was so inept on offense they didn't even get close to scoring until late in the fourth quarter when Scheelhaase connected with TE Evan Wilson in the end zone. But with a clock managing mastermind like Ron Zook, they might as well have not scored at all.
The loss to Ohio State set up a paradigm for the rest of Illinois’ losses. In five of their last seven games, they would fail to score for an entire half before managing a touchdown or two somewhere in the fourth quarter -- but too little too late.
Most of the blame has been directed to their offensive line, which gave up 36 sacks and 89 tackles for loss. I’m not sure why they were so bad, though. Including walk-ons, the Illini had 18 offensive linemen on their roster in 2011 (to compare, Michigan had 14), so depth wasn’t an obvious problem. Talent, chemistry, coaching -- those things I can’t analyze with much authority, but when Michigan played them, this happened:
|Van Bergen||14.5||2||12.5||To be fair, two points in garbage time. HAHAHAHA|
|Roh||9||-||9||Oh… oh wow.|
|Heininger||5||2||3||Didn't get in on the sack explosion largely because he's lifted in the nickel.|
|Clark||3||3||0||Zone read WTF was kind of magnificent. More later.|
|Black||1||3.5||-2.5||Other guy to WTF a zone read.|
|Campbell||4||-||4||Time to get excited about him again until next week.|
|TOTAL||55.5||13.5||42||That is nuts.|
After Zook got fired, DC Vic Koenning was offered the head coaching position. I imagine he recalled six games’ worth of bitter thoughts towards the offense before politely declining.
Best win: Northwestern.
Worst loss: Minnesota, because Minnesota is automatically the worst loss on anyone’s schedule.
At the time we thought they were as frightening as: A large rock (see above). Fear level = 6.
But now we know they are as frightening as: A large rock that has spent the last two decades with Andy Dufresne and a rock hammer. 3.
What the win meant for Michigan: It meant that Michigan got their second win on the road and their first in November, and they did so by playing so well on defense it made Greg Mattison teary-eyed.
The offense was still a little shaky. When Fitz wasn’t slicing through Koenning’s defense for massive gains, the offense was moving backwards. Denard struggled after the early 14-point lead. He eventually exited the game when he bashed his hand against some guy’s helmet.
Regardless, the Wolverines ground out a win in a fashion that hasn’t been seen since Lloyd Carr was head coach. By the second half of the game, it was apparent that Michigan was never going to be in danger of losing -- they just had to find a way to ice the game with another score and just bleed the clock, which they did. Of course, having Zook help out with the latter was a nice bonus.
And it totally felt as awesome as: How John Henry would have felt if he hadn’t been so rushed.
Kept changing depending on how scary they seemed all season.
Well I remember that, just that given our road struggles we were running toward's them
I hope all future Opponent Watches featuring the Illini have this large rock picture (or a hilariously photoshopped version of it for when they are really good or really bad).
"By the second half of the game, it was apparent that Michigan was never going to be in danger of losing"
Having watched the highlights, I have to admit that this is an accurate synopsis of the game. I guess I was more affected by the previous 3 seasons because with Denard out, I remember being very, very concerned. In retrospect, I'm not really sure why.
I wasn't buying into the Illini even when they were 6-0. They looked very much like Penn State before the Sandusky thing broke, always beating really bad teams by scores of 17-14 or 23-20. The majority of the folks here were really nervous about that game as I recall.
But hey, they got to go on and beat UCLA in the Fight Hunger Bowl. The Bruins being, I believe, the only sub 500 team in history to go to a bowl game.
North Texas was the first. They won the Sun Belt but had a losing record. Not sure exactly when this was.
They were 5-1 in the conference, but 5-6 overall. Their 24-21 win over Middle Tennessee State (also 5-1) put them in the New Orleans Bowl, where they lost to Colorado State.
I tried clicking the link and it said "Page not found." I mean I have no memories of what happened that day; perhaps the game was never played.
Sorry, the link was broken. But now it's fixed!
It seems like they do terrible whenever they have expectations. When no one thinks they can win more than three or four games they take down #1 OSU and go to the rose bowl.
This year beating Illinois will be a form of revenge against Toledo given the new head coach.
They actually fired the coach that beat Michigan the same year they did it.
This means one of two things: 1) Toledo's AD is totally crazy or 2) the 2008 team was really that bad. Actually, it could be both.
Yes, they won 3 games, and one of them was Michigan.
To me, this was the point in the season when I began to really believe that Team 132 was different. I spent that whole game waiting for the punch to my soul dong. Then, TJ Floyd got a INT, Fitz scored and I slowly came to realize that my dong was not going to be punched. The game ended and our guys were all smiles like the game was never really in danger - because it wasn't. It was at this point that I realized that this was a different team. And by different, I mean the same as it used to be.
He will be missed by all... of Illinois' opponents!
lol great pic