One Last Blind Stab In The Dark Comment Count

Brian

rich-rodriguez_p1 Jim-Harbaugh goat

Let's make a deal.

Saturday Michigan takes on Mississippi State in the Gator Bowl and Sunday something may or may not happen involving the throttling of an infant Denard Robinson in his cradle and the tears and lamentation that may or may not result. That would hypothetically also mean the reign of terror Greg Robinson's hair and the zombie minion that goes by the name of Greg Robinson would be over. The city of Ann Arbor emerging from its cocoon of upper middle class ennui to shoot AK47s in the air would at least partially offset the tragic, still hypothetical loss of baby Denard. I have taken too long on this bit.

Two days later Jim Harbaugh and his Stanford Cardinal take on Virginia Tech in the Orange Bowl. After he may or may not be destined for Michigan or the 49ers or the moon. The latest from Harbaugh is reminiscent of one Brian Kelly last year:

"I only talk about the job I have now," Harbaugh said when asked if he or his representatives had spoken to the 49ers about their coaching vacancy.

He acknowledged having a "dual focus"—

WHHHAAAA?

--on his team, which will play Virginia Tech in the Orange Bowl on Monday, and on his daughter, Katherine, who was born just before Christmas.

Aw, come on, Harbaugh.

So what's going to happen? I still don't know. No one does. Last time on this show I said I didn't have anything solid and probably wouldn't because of the nature of the "search" but that the mystical aura wasn't looking so hot:

I'm not inclined to put much in the widespread chatter that had RR out the door after the OSU game and seems to be continuing since its sourcing seems to be pissed-off-you-guys folk clearly unhappy with the state of the program taking small interactions and interpreting them as they desire. However, the vibe I'm getting from other people who seem to be on the fence about what to do—or at least close to it—also makes it seem unlikely Rodriguez is back. Emphasis on all the qualifying words in the previous sentence, please. I've got nothing solid because no one does.

I also said that Brady Hoke would be named Michigan's coach over my dead body and the last semblance of sanity in the universe but that wasn't based on inside information. It was more a "has everybody gone CRAZY!?!" moment, and if the threat of Hoke didn't linger in the air I'd apologize for it. As it is I'm on the battlements with an axe* waiting to behead anyone who pops up and says "my name is Buh—." Bill Parcells is duly warned.

With less that a week left before the month of limbo is over, I haven't received anything that pushes my opinion much one way or the other. To reiterate, that's:

  1. There is a nonzero chance Rodriguez is fired, otherwise there would have been an announcement.
  2. Schools do not start coaching searches on January 2nd.
  3. There's only one guy out there that could plausibly be socked away or all but in time for Michigan to have a reasonable finish in recruiting and could justify yet more chaos in a program that is pointed in the right direction, even if vaguely.

So it's Rodriguez or Harbaugh and we'll probably know the day after the Orange Bowl. With all due respect to people who would argue otherwise, it makes no sense to fire Rodriguez in January if you do not have a coach lined up immediately. Since the list of people other than Harbaugh who Michigan could install within a week reads "Buh—[blood theatrically spraying from neck]" your alternatives are between rushing someone through without pause for consideration—which worked out so well last time—or dragging the search almost up to Signing Day, leaving your recruiting class a smoking crater and possibly dooming the next guy, who will forever be Not Jim Harbaugh, to repeat the cycle.

I have heard some things that push me more towards Harbaugh:

  • Some connected guys at Cal email that Tedford is aiming to poach Harbaugh's OL coach since he has "agreed to go elsewhere already" as of the 17th of December. Caveat: the Cal rumor mill bears no animus towards Rodriguez but would love to see Harbaugh anywhere but Stanford, so as things get passed down the chain they get more certain.
  • A player who split his career between RR/Carr years tells an emailer that Harbaugh will be installed on the fifth. Caveat: why the hell would some former player know?
  • An emailer who reports things second hand but has been reliable in the past suggests that Mary Sue Coleman isn't a big fan of Rodriguez, which isn't much of anything to go on but just adds to the pile.
  • Media people I talk to generally say the best thing is probably to give him one more year but that they don't expect he'll get it. Also not much of anything but vibe.

The only thing pointing the other way is the generally sunny disposition coming from within Schembechler Hall, but with recruits the coaches are saying they've got no idea what's going on but if they're still around after the bowl they'll still be around forever, or something to that effect. That's a hard sale right there.

If I was 55-45 Harbaugh a month ago I'm 65-35 Harbaugh now. I wish I could be more certain and wouldn't make the decision I think is likely if I was king of the world, but that's life. We'll know soon enough.

AWFUL BONUS: If there is a change you can go start the Denard transfer watch at DEFCON 2, since Robinson knows what he is—the Big Ten offensive player of the year as a sophomore at quarterback—and where he fits. How screwed up is a program that manages to get both Ryan Mallett and Denard Robinson to transfer away from certain starting QB jobs in the course of three years?

This hasn't happened yet. Breathe. I am talking to myself mostly.

*(To avoid a Tucker Carlson moment let me clarify: I am not going to cut Brady Hoke or anyone's head off with an axe.)

Comments

M-Wolverine

December 30th, 2010 at 8:48 PM ^

I may very well be older than you. But at any age, I have the wisdom not to make fanciful statements like "greatest football mind of our generation", when all he's proven do far is to be a pretty darn good offensive mind, but utterly clueless how to put a defense and defensive staff together to be the greatest anything. I'm mean the list of people who have accomplished more wouldn't be short. So act your age, and keep your family legacy in your pants; it impresses no one and is far less involved with the University than many on this site. If the last few seasons, or future happenings make you squirm that badly, that's the point: don't let the door hit you on the way out. It doesn't matter whether you care or not what others think; that's the point, that if you're turned off and give up that easily, we don't really care what you think either, and you won't be missed. So go, play with your kid, there's nothing wrong with that. And we'll all still be here when we're winning again and you crawl back saying you've been here all along. If you ever go in the first place, and aren't just being a drama queen. You'll be forgotten, but those who stuck around will know they did, and you'll always know you ditched when things were tough. Whether you admit it to anyone else, or even yourself. Bye.

MGlobules

December 31st, 2010 at 10:58 AM ^

and no noodle on the internet gets to take that away from anyone else, least of all if they're pissed off about what you're arguing.

The poster attacked my loyalty, and I responded by stating my connections. When you grandfather and every member of your immediate family went to Michigan--when your Dad worked with Bo, when much of your family remains in A2--yeah, you do become loyal, in a way that no one who has "The Barwis Effect" for his frackin' avatar and is calling for RichRod's head can take away. I didn't say it made me better, only loyal.  

M-Wolverine

December 31st, 2010 at 1:57 PM ^

With you. It's childish.  And you must not understand the term "loyal", because you're admittedly ready to throw away the program in your life because the coach might change. Which you didn't do when Mo took over, then was ditched unfairly, or Lloyd took over, or Rich took over, changing everything. You stuck through that. But 2 bads seasons and a change you now finally disagree with, and you're out?  That's not loyal, that's self-serving. Your mentality just justified ever person who didn't want to accept Rich from the start because they didn't like the move. No one is taking it away from you. You're giving it away.

M-Wolverine

January 1st, 2011 at 12:20 PM ^

 

The upside is that I will spend more Saturdays with my daughter. . . at least for the two years it takes the equally impatient Jimbo to decide that life might be sweeter in the NFL. 

I will, however, have enjoyed these several great years among the fine cyberpeeps of Mgoblog.

 

Maybe you should read what you write before you question other's reading comprehension. 

wolverinehusker

December 30th, 2010 at 4:42 PM ^

...but it's a little hyperbolic to call Rich Rod the best football mind of our generation. I'm squarely on the side of Rich Rod staying, but let's not all get misty eyed and forget the money we had to pay to West Virginia, the NCAA violations, the disastrous defense, and the many, many other issues that, while not entirely his fault, are not indicative of a messiah.

Callahan

December 31st, 2010 at 10:26 AM ^

I disagree with you on one point: RR's mistake was not failing to hire a DC that would work well with the staff. His mistake was not supporting the DC when the position coaches undermined him.  It's probably why they had such a hard time finding a replacement for Shafer. (If you recall, the DC hire took two or three months).

Milty87

December 31st, 2010 at 11:40 AM ^

I think this was RR's biggest mistake.  No hierarchical organization can thrive when it's possible to skip one of the levels of command/responsibility.  I've lived through a similar situation in a military unit (luckily not one of the three people involved), and at best, it results in lowered morale and the loss of effectiveness of the by-passed person, but more often also leads to a drop in effectiveness of the entire unit.

Lutha

December 31st, 2010 at 5:05 PM ^

I agree with you that my previous post sounded like mindless propaganda without substantiation.  However, my point was regarding RR's moves when he took over the program.  Although most would agree that some change was necessary at the time, RR basically decided to NUKE a previously successful 9-4 program by firing all of the assistant coaches (except FJ).  Not only did this not engender goodwill from staffers, the community, media, etc, but we have yet to reap any payoff from doing so.  After 3 years, the program is still not at the level we were at when RR took over and it would be pretty optimistic to think that we could get there even next year.

Fuzzy Dunlop

December 30th, 2010 at 3:11 PM ^

One thing is for sure.  If Harbaugh is hired, and has a great season next year, we'll STILL be having arguments about whether Rodriguez would have done better, and if all of Harbaugh's success is the result of players Rodriguez recruited being a year older, etc.

uvadula

December 30th, 2010 at 3:50 PM ^

I know Harbaugh isn't a spread guru but for the next two years is there a good reason he cant just hand the reigns to Denard and let him go crazy on the league while he fixes the defense. There's more than enough work to be done on that side of the ball and Denard next year is going to be insanely good.

blue note

December 30th, 2010 at 6:20 PM ^

Let's be honest, only one of those three has accomplished enough to endear himself to the fans.

Hold the tears. Like someone said earlier, it's pretty improbable that Denard would transfer. He'll be a great player for UM next year no matter who the coach is.

Callahan

December 31st, 2010 at 10:31 AM ^

You don't know if Denard would leave. That's crap the Pro-RR crowd keeps putting out there, without any basis. Do you really think a new coach wouldn't try to keep him? Does Denard seem like the kind of kid who would walk out on his teammates?

But Barwis? He'd probably be gone, based on statements he made in the past about his loyalty to RR.

jtblue

December 30th, 2010 at 3:35 PM ^

This has been coming since the second half of the Wisconsin game - I never thought I'd see the team in blue get pushed around like that in the Big House.

I fully subscribe to the theory that college coaches ought to have the opportunity to graduate at least one class before judgment is rendered, especially when accompanied by radical philiosphy changes.

It is a certain shame how Coach Rod will be remembered for his tenure here (he would have been better off without mandatory press conferences). However, if he needed a signature win to save his job, then the inverse would be true: the Wisconsin game is the signature loss that ushered in the end of this era.

If Rodriguez is leading the team next fall I will be excited and uber-confident in a successful year. If Harbaugh is leading the team next fall I will be exicted and uber-confident in a successful year. Maybe it's just me, but I just don't get any other approach.

uvadula

December 30th, 2010 at 3:43 PM ^

I agree that Rodriguez deserves four years, but Michigan may never again be the favorite to land the hottest coach in college football. Not that I'd make the change but it would be tough to give up all the good press and momentum landing a coach like that would give us.

STEVEC83

December 30th, 2010 at 3:36 PM ^

The analogy I have been using lately is a transplant patient rejecting the transplanted organ.  The body needs the organ but it rejects it anyway because it is different.  We all knew Michigan football needed to change to keep up with the truly elite programs but the fanbase and the program weren't prepared for radical change.  Some PR mistakes and poor on field results have only accelerated the rejection process. 

I think RR might have success at UM if allowed to stay but the situation has deteriorated to the point where the program should move in a different direction.  Like it or not, JH is the solution straight from central casting if you buy my analogy.  Brandon has set this up to go after JH quickly and quietly as soon as bowl season ends.  If he whiffs, it will be in private with no embarrassment to the University.  He then forces RR to make wholesale changes to the defensive staff and essentially installs a co-head coach as defensive coordinator.  If the on field results improve great.  If not, the decision is obvious and the new DC may even be a head coaching candidate.  I think we whiff on JH and he goes to the NFL setting up a really dysfunctional 2011.        

LatinForLiar

December 30th, 2010 at 3:57 PM ^

"the situation has deteriorated to the point where the program should move in a different direction"

What is this "situation"? it obviously isn't "quality of football displayed on Saturdays" because that has not deteriorated, but actually teriorated over the last 3 years. I think the "situation" is a meaningless story created by a brainless 24 hour newsmedia. Either that or a pathetic reality TV personality. Either way, that is no reason to fire a football coach.

pullin4blue

December 30th, 2010 at 3:37 PM ^

I read one post about the Maryland game. The AD did say that they were looking for someone with a "flashy, high-powered" offense. No mention of defense. The announcers danced around RR, but did mention him by name.

I think DB told RR that he should quietly entertain other job offers. I'm sure there is a monetary penalty if he were to disclose that he was not being retained. His agent is likely shopping him around. I also think J.H. has already been hired and will be announced as the new head coach at the same time DB announces parting of ways with RR.

There will be no coaching search. That has been going on since the Wisconsin game. DB will make it so smooth you won't even know what hit you.

jg2112

December 30th, 2010 at 3:57 PM ^

You're probably right. As we learned the last time Michigan looked to hire a coach, RR's agent is likely out there feeling out the current job openings. If he is let go next week, I won't be shocked if he's hired by Maryland, or if Clemson / Georgia suddenly feel compelled to let their head guy go so they can hire Rodriguez.

And if RR goes to Maryland, ack Darian Cooper and Josh Furman???

jblaze

December 30th, 2010 at 3:44 PM ^

Some connected guys at Cal email that Tedford is aiming to poach Harbaugh's OL coach since he has "agreed to go elsewhere already" as of the 17th of December. Caveat: the Cal rumor mill bears no animus towards Rodriguez but would love to see Harbaugh anywhere but Stanford, so as things get passed down the chain they get more certain.

The above quote does not mean nor indicate that JH is headed towards Michigan. SF 49er fans are very confident that JH will be there coach and he was linked to Carolina for a long time.

I even spoke to a PSU fan who claims JH is a candidate for their job.

One thing appears certain, JH is NOT going to be Stanford's coach next season. Other than that, it's all speculation.