Oh God What If Boston College Follows You Around Like You Just Broke Up With It And It Wants To Be Friends Comment Count

Brian

10/7/2017 – Michigan 10, Michigan State 14 – 4-1, 1-1 Big Ten

36903704493_1fa28ea9a4_z

a metaphor for somethin' [Bryan Fuller]

Don Brown is in one of those Progressive commercials where everything gradually turns white, except in his case everything is gradually turning back into Boston College. Someone walks by with a bunch of hockey sticks. Bill Simmons is on the television again. He swears he overhears a conversation about pahking the cah. Maroon filters into his peripheral vision.

On Wednesday at three fifteen PM there is going to be a knock on the door. Steve Addazio is going to walk in and sit down. Brown will summon all his willpower not to jam the nearest pen through his own eyesocket, to claw the power of sight from his face and evaporate from the world of men.

Jay Harbaugh, seated, will wonder if the slight twitch under Brown's eye means anything or if it's just something that happens to men of a certain age. He will not say something about "guys being dudes," and will never know how close he—how close all of us—came to Total Mustache Annihilation. He will tell Brown about Terrace House, a Japanese version of the Real World where everyone is very nice and considerate of each other's feelings.

Thus disabused of the Addazio specter, Brown will resume destroying all that opposes him until the inevitable knife in the back. He tries not to think of Sisyphus, and fails.

----------------------------------------------------

Michigan's main problem on offense is that they are bad at it. This is not a good problem. "Our right tackle sucks" is something you might be able to address. "Almost everyone is not good at football right now" leads to situations like Saturday. I brought up the Law Of Large Percentages Multiplied A Lot, which is something I just made up right now, in a brief twitter conversation with a reporter who wanted people to know one weird thing about Oklahoma football:

That is a weird thing, but it's not as weird as it sounds. If OU was a 10 point favorite in eight games they'd get through unscathed just 12% of the time*. If they were a 14 point favorite they get up to 27%. You have to get up to 17.5—a 93.7% shot at victory!—before Hypothetical OU even hits 50%. The Law Of Large Percentages Multiplied A Lot is that even big ones fall off faster than you'd think.

Michigan's offense has 6-7-8 guys who have to execute on any particular play for it to be a success, and... let's just say many of them are not three-score favorites to do so on any particular play. They are an example of The Law Of Large Percentages And Some Quite Small Ones Multiplied A Lot. The results can be seen in the box score, or the haunted look on the face of a man who replaced ten starters and still has the #3 defense in the country.

And so today the Must brigade is out. "Must" is the worst word in sportswriting for a lot of reasons. Foremost among them is that whatever follows "must" is something so blindingly obvious Marcelo Balboa is probably talking about a replay of it as we speak. He must catch that ball. He must YES WE KNOW I HAVE EYES, AT LEAST FOR NOW, I'M CONSIDERING A CHANGE IN THAT DEPARTMENT, THANK YOU.

I spent most of the weekend trying and failing to get this column done because I couldn't wade into any commentary on the game that wasn't furious and over the top, and immediately made me want to go do something else. Weird shit happens in college football, especially when you're playing your backup QB, and there's a brief second-half monsoon, and on top of that you turn the ball over five times. Various dirt stupid people are now flogging a "Harbaugh is 1-4 versus rivals" thing as if that encapsulates the whole of his tenure, or even his career. Yeah, Michigan had the dumb thing happen on the punt and lost by a literal inch in Columbus last year. If you're ascribing that to something other than chance I cannot help you.

Whatever Harbaugh MUST do he's probably already doing. He has a track record, and he'll either follow that up with more of the same or not. We're oddly locked in: few coaches trying to establish themselves at a new school come with the pedigree that Harbaugh does, so he'll get a ton of time and a bunch of rope and we'll see where it goes. It'll probably go really well once they aren't carrying the baggage of someone else's screwups on top of their base rate.

But I mean, go ahead and yell about how unacceptable everything is, I guess. We are dying to hear about your feelings.

*[This is based on this site's conversion of point spreads to winners.]

37314647460_ff2fcffbc0_z

blanket [Fuller]

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Mo Hurst. Hurst got to play a lot of three tech this week and went from making good plays that someone else scoops up the glory on to wrecking the interior of the opposition offense himself. The fourth down stop stands out, because Hurst may have induced the fumble from a nervous center; Hurst whooped him anyway and the play was doomed either way.

#2 Lavert Hill. Hill's three PBUs were all excellent plays, and he was in the hip pocket of whoever his assignment was for the duration. MSU had... one open receiver? Maybe two? Lewerke averaged 4.3 YPA. Hill played the largest part in that.

#3 Brad Robbins. Averaged 43 yards a punt in often-difficult conditions and mindblasted the MSU returner on the muff; gave up just ten total return yards on seven attempts.

Honorable mention: Most of the rest of the defense. And... Grant Perry, I guess?

KFaTAotW Standings.

8: Devin Bush (#1 Florida, T2 Cincinnati, T2 Air Force, #1 Purdue)
5: Chase Winovich(#1 Air Force, #2a Purdue) 
3: Mason Cole (#1, Cincinnati), Ty Isaac (#2, Florida, #3 Cincinnati), Mo Hurst (#1 MSU)   
2: Quinn Nordin (#3 Florida, #3 Air Force), John O'Korn (#2 Purdue), Lavert Hill (#2 MSU)
1: Khaleke Hudson (T2 Cincinnati), Tyree Kinnel (T2 Cincinnati), Mike McCray(T2 Air Force), Sean McKeon(T3 Purdue), Zach Gentry (T3 Purdue), Brad Robbins(#3 MSU).

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

MSU's punt returner dorfs on a bomb by Robbins, muffing it back to the two and setting up a short field that Michigan would use to get their touchdown.

Honorable mention: The first drive was pretty all right until the back-to-back fades.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Eddie McDoom drops a pass that would have taken Michigan down to the 25 with 13 seconds left.

Honorable mention: Pick a turnover but especially the first two, as they were key in Michigan's deficit by the time the rain arrived. Lewerke scrapes out a late first down because he lands on Michigan players. Michigan gets a touchdown wiped off the board on a Higdon holding call. Most offensive plays.

[After THE JUMP: what would you say you do here]

OFFENSE

Under pressure. I am down with Tim Drevno glaring at this juncture. He got dealt a tough hand. So far he's blown it. He comes in late and takes a flier on Ulizio; Ulizio just got yanked for Bushell-Beatty. More egregious was Michigan's OL recruiting the year after. Despite an obvious, crying need for tackles Michigan took zero—zero zero zero.

They inherited Erik Swenson and dicked around with him until January despite the fact they knew they had no desire to take him. Then they got blindsided by Devery Hamilton's Stanford flip. Replacing those guys was... nobody. Michigan added Stephen Spanellis, who's 100% a guard, and has since played Ben Bredeson exclusively at guard despite the fact that he was supposedly neck and neck with Newsome for the LT job last year. So instead of two redshirt freshman tackle bullets Michigan has nothing but Ulizio and Brady Hoke's leftovers.

Michigan has one highly touted tackle in Drevno's tenure, freshman Chuck Filiaga. Michigan had to know about the looming hole there and they've utterly failed to address it. That goes back to Drevno. Add in the disjointed OL in year three and it might be FCS head coaching time.

Settle in. Bizarrely, in the midst of the game Chris Fowler told the world that Wilton Speight had cracked vertebrae and was out for the season. Tom Van Haaren followed this up with an article:

Wilton Speight has three broken vertebrae in his back, a source confirmed to ESPN.

ESPN's Chris Fowler first reported Speight's injury at the top of ABC's Saturday night broadcast of the Michigan State-Michigan game saying: "Wilton Speight ... he is out, probably for the season. He has three broken vertebrae, he told us." ...

While it's likely that Speight will be out for the remainder of the season, he will be reevaluated six to eight weeks after the injury occurred.

For unnecessary confirmation, a reader forwarded this David Turnley photo along from instasnapbook:

P_2lE6iC

I got a report that Speight told someone not affiliated with ESPN he could be back in four weeks. I'd assume that the longer projection is more likely to be correct. It boggles the mind that fractured freakin' vertebrae aren't obviously season-ending. Anyway, don't expect Speight back any time soon.

O'Korn couldn't see anything. I don't know how much of O'Korn's tendency to stand in the pocket for four or five seconds before attempting to scramble out was on him and how much was on the wide receivers not getting open. That was the main theme in the passing offense, though: reasonable protection that eventually breaks down on the right side; O'Korn hangs onto the ball way too long. A couple of sacks were four or five seconds in the pocket, and O'Korn has to know that he's not likely to get that much time.

Break glass in case of—*BREAKS GLASS*. If Speight's out for the year and O'Korn continues to struggle the calls for Brandon Peters will be incessant, and I'll be amongst them. Without a radically improved offense this team is topping out as a Citrus Bowl outfit. Time to see what Peters brings to the table.

37302118580_0e564ee86b_z

THIS IS THE WRONG PERSON TO FADE AT [Upchurch]

I have several problems with you people. Michigan's first drive was going swimmingly until two routes in the corner of the endzone yielded zilch. One was a wheel route to McKeon that was well covered, and I guess that's understandable. The second was a fade to McDoom. Michigan's policy of exclusively throwing fades at people a foot shorter than Zach Gentry is driving me crazy. Fades aren't great in general. Fades at a 5'11" guy who isn't Jeremy Gallon make me want to fade into Bolivia.

At least the Hail Mary went at the right guy:

37540691182_5abba58410_z

[Upchurch]

So we've got that going for us.

Zero QB run game. Other game calling complaints: Michigan had zero QB run game for O'Korn. I'm not asking Michigan to go Denard with him, but at no point did Michigan make MSU even think about O'Korn as a runner. Very frustrating when MSU gets half their rushing yards from Lewerke, and even more so when the second half cried out for various ways to make yards without throwing the ball.

37560717051_e3fba3f1ac_z

These guys are too close together [Upchurch]

Next to zero deep shots. I saved the worst for last, but I'm not sure exactly who this is on: Michigan basically did not test the Michigan State safeties in pass coverage. One attempted corner route to Gentry was broken up after it looked like DPJ ran the wrong route, drawing additional defenders—or at least not delaying them. Michigan didn't go after them again, basically for the whole game. What deep shots did exist were on the sideline against the corners; M utterly failed to heed the lessons of the Big 12.

Crawford. He had a play on a deep ball and did not make it, adding to his litany of missed opportunities. Have to wonder if Black could have made a difference here. The continued absence of Oliver Marin and Nico Collins means they're all but certain to redshirt; I guess I can't complain about that because Freshman Wide Receivers Suck, but I am a little disappointed one of them hasn't broken through a battered screen door.

Yes, Brady Hoke is still partially responsible for this. The only Hoke players who are playing more than a very minor role are the two fullbacks, Ty Isaac, Mason Cole, and Patrick Kugler. The quarterback depth chart reads...

  • Generic Three Star
  • Houston Transfer
  • Redshirt Freshman

...because of Hoke.

Michigan's unusual wait to pick up Harbaugh is another contributing factor. Harbaugh brought in a bunch of dudes from the NFL who were picking up college recruiting cold and had to scramble to add a number of guys in three weeks. They added more contributors in that time than Hoke did for the entire cycle. (Wheatley, Gentry, Higdon, and Perry vs Kinnel, Newsome, and I guess Ulizio.) It was still not enough to rescue a tiny class.

DEFENSE

37512692276_98c8c151cf_z

crunch [Upchurch]

So that's how you stay in contact with five turnovers. The preview projected ten MSU points plus whatever the offense handed them, and this turned out to be pessimistic. MSU had 8 three-and-outs, one of them a four-and-out turnover on downs. They gave up a short-field TD drive based mostly on QB scrambles; they gave up an actual long TD drive that was about half a contested downfield deep ball that was a PBU... and also a catch. A selection of we-saved-this plays got them the rest of the way. One 50 yard run was about the only other thing Michigan gave up until the four-minute drill that got a couple first downs, the second incredibly fortunate.

The second-half D was helped out by the weather and MSU's (very, very correct) conservative approach, but you really can't ask for more. Michigan should have ground MSU down in a field position game for the entirety of the second half and won, but O'Korn's interceptions prevented that.

More Mone. Bryan Mone got his most extensive playing time of the year. He—or another DT—was almost always in there on any manball-ish snap. Mone did well, plowing various dudes back, and that's reassuring for future manball outings and Mone's future in general.

Bush relatively quiet. Devin Bush made a number of tackles at or near the line of scrimmage but didn't have any dramatic backfield plunderings. For the first time this year he was held off the stat sheet aside from tackles. It'll be interesting to see whether that was tactical from either team, a manball effect, or just one of those things.

FWIW, the PF he got was total crap; even if he deserved it he'd just been punched in the face and at worst it should have been offsetting. The offsides at the end was painful. I mean, sort of. It would have been more painful if it seemed like the offense could score in the next sixty years.

37573137211_3ae38ce4d6_k

no sir [Fuller]

Lavert Hill headed towards excellent. Hill had three PBUs, each of them excellent. The most excellent may have been a zone snap where he was in cover two and fell off the short route, breaking up a 15-ish yard throw that otherwise would have been a first down chunk. He had another on a deep corner route on which he was in the WR's hip pocket and provided zero window.

There were a few open MSU receivers short in zone stuff and one a bit deeper—he dropped it. Other than that, nothing was open. Brandon Watson kinda sorta got beat on a ball he got his hand on; that's the second time in two weeks that's happened to a Michigan CB. Makes you wonder why Michigan isn't trying to get similar chunks when nothing else is working.

No sacks, barely. Lewerke was dragged down fractionally behind the line of scrimmage a couple times but the official box score had those as zero yard runs, so Rashan Gary did not get credit for a sack when he flung down Lewerke with one hand.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Got one? Probably. Given the trajectory of one MSU punt and Jared Wangler going nuts afterwards I think Michigan got their first punt block of the year. Unfortunately it was one of those that goes 22 yards instead of –22 yards, but that's life, especially in this game.

Hartbarger was seemingly uncomfortable on a couple more, with some uncharacteristically short punts.

Never return kickoffs. That is all.

MISCELLANEOUS

The ministry of silly runs. Chris Evans had occasion to do this in a football game:

37302167420_578e1ddeb2_z

[Upchurch]

Football is weird.

HERE

Best And Worst:

But this game felt like 2001, or 1990, or even 2015, games where Michigan State was more lucky than good. That doesn't mean MSU didn't play well enough to win, only that these weren't dominant wins by superior teams like (sadly) they were against Hoke's and RR's teams. MSU needed 5 turnovers (and none of their own), a backup QB, a torrential downpour, and a QB being stopped short after a fumbled snap yet sliding on his falling center's leg to barely hold on against Michigan, and while that's usually how underdogs win games, it doesn't point toward sustained dominance in this series by the Spartans.

Bill Connelly pointed this out in his Five Factors post this weekend: MSU had a turnover margin of +4.8 above their national average, which works out to about 24 points of "bad luck" by Michigan. Michigan lost such a game by 4 points, and had a chance on the last play to still pull it out. It always sucks to be the team that has the luck go against it, but this loss still feels different. MSU tried to give this game away, and they nearly did with poor clock management and even poorer self control. This loss, as bad as it is in the moment, feels like 2015, a stumble but not a fall. I don't put too much stock into tides or narratives, but this rivalry is starting to feel like it did during most of my youth, where MSU wins were notable because of their weirdness and not their dominance. And I think the other half of that equation, the scarcity of Spartan victories, will follow soon as well.

You can also keep up with Michigan alums playing in Japan:

Devin Gardner led the Nojima Rise to another high scoring victory, this time besting the Lixil Deers 38-35 at Amino Vital Field.

Mario Ojemudia recorded a sack on the opening series of the game for Nojuma. Starting from their own 42 after the subsequent punt, Gardner drove the Rise down to the Deer 11 yard line, and a field goal made it 3-0.

ELSEWHERE

Nope!

Comments

Wolvie3758

October 9th, 2017 at 3:39 PM ^

losing to our rival repeately was the reason the last 2 coaches were run out of town but somehow NOW it matters not..Im not saying  fire Harbaugh..not at all BUT if you want to stick your head in the sand and not see it for the troubling trend it is then so be it,,AND with OSU still upcoming and looking WAY WAY better than our inept team its going to be 1-5...that doesnt bother you?

mgobaran

October 9th, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^

Actually you know what. Harbaugh's contract runs 
out in 2021. That's actually 5 more OSU games. 
Probably should count those as losses too. So we
are currently 1-9 against rivals Even if he sweeps
MSU he can only top out at 6-9 (Nice!) before his
contract runs out. 7-10 at best once he has to play
big bad Notre Dame.


That is unexceptable. Next coach please. 

 

Wolvie3758

October 9th, 2017 at 5:12 PM ^

years are we going to have a big talent deficit? been what 10 years now and 3 under Harbaugh..?  just saying it looks like we havent really progressed all that much

Unicycle Firefly

October 9th, 2017 at 3:49 PM ^

So, the win-loss record doesn’t establish a trend of long-term dominance in a series? Then what does? Where do moral victories go in the record books? Can we hang banners for them?

Unicycle Firefly

October 9th, 2017 at 4:36 PM ^

Of course, but we can also acknowledge that MSU was playing in the same conditions on Saturday with a team that had been decimated by an off-season scandal.  Michigan had an extra week to prepare and looked atrocious well before the conditions took a turn for the worse. 

I saw a game on Saturday in which MSU more or less controlled the game after the opening drive.  It never felt like Michigan was in the driver's seat, and that isn't the result of a fluke.  Five turnovers versus zero turnovers isn't a fluke, and that's the type of thing people are rightfully upset about.  The smug attitude that "well, they're just lucky, they aren't dominating us" is exactly what puts teams in the mindset to lose year in and year out, and I hate to say it, but it's such a stereotypical Michigan-like attitude to have.

CompleteLunacy

October 9th, 2017 at 6:46 PM ^

As long as you acknowledge the impact of the black hole of talent that Hoke left our offense that now is manifesting itself on the field.  

And actually five turnovers IS a fluke, on some level. Because it rarely, if ever, happens. Ben Roethlisburger threw 5 INTs on Sunday. Alabama had 5 turnovers in a bowl game with OU  a few years ago.

I can point to  2 - 3 of our turnovers Saturday had some component of luck involved.(two fumbles lost and a really lucky INT that hits the DB's arm and bounces right back at him).

And also - THEY DIDNT DOMINATE US. We lost by four points man. Four. 

Unicycle Firefly

October 9th, 2017 at 7:01 PM ^

And I can counter right back with the gaping black hole of talent left on the Spartan team by a massive sexual assault scandal in the off-season.   

As far as turnovers, some are luck, but a running back with a history of ball control issues putting it on the turf yet again isn't entirely luck, it's poor fundamentals and discipline.  From a highly recruited senior player. 

Finally, I never said MSU dominated the game.  They've dominated the rivalry by virtue of winning it nearly every year for the past decade.  Saturday wasn't domination, it was a disciplined, well-coached team following a gameplan, playing to their strengths, and controlling the game.  Weather wasn't an excuse, youth wasn't an excuse, a hostile crowd wasn't an excuse, and massive attrition wasn't an excuse. 

Michigan had almost every conceivable advantage entering this game, and in the end they were lucky that it was even as close as it was.  That's what people are upset about.

CompleteLunacy

October 9th, 2017 at 6:37 PM ^

Harbaugh is a literal inch and negative once-in-a-lifetime event away from being 3-2. Forgive me if I don't think that establishes a long-term trend of dominance against Michigan under Harbaugh.

Going back further? Yes! Of course our rivals have established dominance on Michigan over the past 1-2 decades! But unless you want to pin all those losses under Hoke, RR, and Carr (for OSU) on Harbaugh, what good does it do to discuss it rather than making us all feel like shit, again?

Michigan4Life

October 9th, 2017 at 4:13 PM ^

I'd think hard about pulling McCaffery's redshirt off since he's reportedly ahead of Peters if it weren't for the redshirt. Just give him experience to get ready for '18 and the future season(s).

Michigan9

October 9th, 2017 at 4:13 PM ^

Yes, it's on the QB to get the ball to the receiver or at least give the receiver a chance....With that being said, our receivers need to run better routes and create some seperation.  I am not sure how many times a ball was thrown in the game with either 2 receivers or a receiver and tight end 2 yards from each other.

Ed Shuttlesworth

October 9th, 2017 at 4:53 PM ^

I like the blithe assumption that any criticism of Harbaugh equals calling for Harbaugh's firing and is therefore "dirt stupid."

He got outcoached and outgameplanned Saturday night, by any serious measure, and it's not exactly great that in Year 3 he's losing to a Sparty team that was 3-9 last year and kicked several good players off the team.  Not sure why that's such an OH, THE HUMANITY!! thing to say.

 

Ed Shuttlesworth

October 9th, 2017 at 4:57 PM ^

As to Hoke and recruiting, even throwing out the 2014-15 transition, freshmen, redshirt freshman, and sophomores successfully play left tackle and right tackle in college football, and have for decades.  Mason Cole did three and especially two years ago.  The second-team 2016 AP all-american team featured ... two sophomore tackles.

Tackle wasn't remotely an unfixable problem for Harbaugh.  He should have fixed it.  He didn't fix it.  Pretty much end of story.

Blue Vet

October 9th, 2017 at 5:24 PM ^

It shouldn't astonish me but still does how many sports fans are determined — need? — to see the outcome of a game as a nearly absolute dichotomy between good and bad. Why did our team win? They "wanted it more." They had more grit, brought a blue-collar mentality, gave 110%, showed moxie, tuned out distractions, used the distractions as motivations, etc., etc. And why did our team lose? That's bad so someone must be to blame.

Michigan beat Purdue partly because O'Korn had the athleticism to escape that sack near the end zone, AND because he was lucky his knee didn't touch the ground (as I believe he said himself), AND because the routes receivers ran gave him one to throw to, AND because no blockers got called for holding, AND because Michigan's coaches had coached O'Korn up, AND because of Purdue's defense stuff. Michigan lost to Michigan State because all those factors didn't align for a Michigan win.

Sports writers HAVE to discuss deeper meanings and assigning blame; it's in the sports writer style guide. But shouldn't we be smarter than sports writers, instead of simply substituting our own psychologizing and finger pointing?

SagNasty

October 9th, 2017 at 8:40 PM ^

I actually noticed the photo of Speight in the brace on the video board pregame Saturday. I mentioned it to my wife and she said, "yup, that's a tslo" she works in orthotics and deals with those braces. Hard to believe he will heal before the end of the season with that type of injury. But we are not doctors so I hope he can play again soon.

Kevin14

October 9th, 2017 at 9:20 PM ^

Should Michigan have thought about going for two after their touchdown?

Game theory obviously says no under normal circumstances, but with a storm coming and both teams struggling to move the ball, it's definitely a closer call.  Hindsight says we should have, but I was definitely saying no at the time.

Ekklesia

October 9th, 2017 at 10:20 PM ^

I’ve not heard anyone comment on this, but I’m wondering why Michigan did not go for two when they scored their lone touchdown (in the third quarter, I think) making the score 14-9.  If they miss on the two-point attempt they’re in the same place as making the extra-point kick - they need a touchdown to take the lead.  But if they convert the two-pointer, they’re only down by a field goal.  With the storm coming it was obvious that scoring would be tough in the fourth quarter, and being down by only a field goal would have changed what they attempted in the final minutes.  In fact, I think the final ‘Hail Mary’ was from the MSU 37-yard line, right?  If U-M had been down by three, then Nordin could have been brought in to try a 54 harder.  Or, they may have been closer than that had they been playing for a field goal rather than a touchdown in desperation.
 
As soon as they scored that touchdown I assumed they’d go for two, but I haven’t heard anyone comment on it.  What am I missing?

HarBooYa

October 9th, 2017 at 10:47 PM ^

No Rashan Gary. Any week this season? Weird.

Great call on the deep shots. MSU gives them. It's what you do with an over aggressive team...that our quick slant with a te. Totally puzzling,,,,and then when the rain came...they couldn't.



Ramblin

October 10th, 2017 at 11:22 PM ^

I appreciate the fact that bad luck and fluky punts have something to do with Michigan's record vs MSU.  The frustrating thing, however, is that we are always favorites with "the experts" in sports books yet we make "the experts" look like idiots every year when Sparty brings its manufactured inferiority complex to town. 

I wrote another post about how I was able to predict the score of this game.  I just knew it was coming...  Again...  I didn't want to, but I just knew.  Isn't this basically what you've come to expect?  

MSU has learned to cheap shot, taunt, make "choke" gestures, pull our QB down on the sidelines, chant #disrespekt to the media, recruit rapists...

What do we do?  We ignore it and hope for the best next year. 

BTW, now the line is that O'korn "flopped."  He was pulled down, but oh well...  The media will run with that while our staff stays quiet and looks toward Indiana.  All of this is working brilliantly for Sparty.

I'd like to see our players/coaches call it like it is.  MSU thinks Michigan is a bunch of pussies that won't fight back when things get ugly.  This belief creates confidence in them and our refusal to acknowledge it creates doubt in us. 

I think Dantonio was brilliant to make it personal for the players and fans of MSU back in the day.  Recruiting known rapists and thugs for their added "toughness" is perhaps a bit much, but it works.  Our plan to rise above it and "stay classy" isn't working.  

The next cheap shot needs to end in a brawl or a worse cheap shot from us.  The next mocking comment from Dantoninio needs to be responded to with a jab about racists, rapists, riots and ACT scores.  In the media.  From our staff and players.  The next time one of their coaches pulls our QB down on the sidelines we should return the favor, only we should make sure to kick him while he's down.  Fuck these hooligans and fight back!!!!

Ah.  That feels better.  Now back to the real point of this rant.  No other team in sports covers the spread EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY PLAY A PARTICULAR RIVAL.  There is no way to sugar coat that. 

Year after year the "experts" - and most everybody else - see us as the better team yet we never cover the spread and we usually lose to this thug squad.  10 covers in a row from Sparty?  WTF?  At this point, betting Sparty to cover is safer than a governmentally insured savings account... 

It's not x's and o's anymore, although the x's and o's were pretty damn bad.  We all need to acknowledge that before it will get better.  

I'm not sure I care enough about football to suggest we become Staee (barf in mouth) to beat Staee, but it's clear they have our number and their "be nasty" approach is why.  I'm OK with us losing to Lousville in basketball because I'd rather lose to them than be them.  Are we to that point with Sparty? 

I'm also not about to suggest we keep the revolving coach door open.  We have to stay with Harbaugh and hope for the best.  However, underperforming in this game every year and doing nothing different is a bad idea.  He must realize that.  I wonder if he isn't being allowed to "do what needs to be done?"

Finally, the world isn't ending.  We will be OK in general.   However, I don't expect our "bad luck" to change in this one anytime soon.  Not unless we change.  It's time to take this game personally in public and in private.  Let's make this our superbowl next year like they do.  Go Blue.

 

 

MGoBlueNY

October 10th, 2017 at 6:15 AM ^

at what point do you realize you sound like a moron blaming hoke for every single loss? harbaugh is 5-4 in his last 9 games. you were all over hoke for an 11-2 season and 2 close road losses. you are a hypocrite. 

Ed Shuttlesworth

October 10th, 2017 at 7:13 AM ^

Yeah, the Hoke thing is getting real, real old.  Harbaugh has had two full recruiting classes, and freshman and sophomores are able to play college football well.  It's troubling to say the least that the top two QBs this deep in are a Hoke recruit and a fluky 5th year transfer.

Harbaugh obviously hasn't found his Andrew Luck yet, or anything close; if he had, his Andrew Luck or anything close would be playing.

NateVolk

October 10th, 2017 at 8:16 AM ^

No round up from other Michigan blogs this week. Curious to know why?

 

My guess is those other blogs are filled with overreaction and talk of Harbaugh's job performance being "unacceptable". Similar to what flowed and continues to from many on this blog.

 

Sparty fans either disappear when they lose or overblow what it all means when they win. We did a lot of door #2 over the last 48 hours. 

 

Having read the comments on this blog for 8 seasons, we're better than that. A 4 point loss in crap conditions where we dropped the rock 5 times. Coaches didn't do a good enough job. Neither did the team. That's obvious when you lose to an underdog at home in a rivalry game.

 

The intelligent fan inside us all needs to see it for what it was. And it definitely was NOT a referendum on Michigan football, Jim Harbaugh, the direction of Michigan football, nor even the current trajectory of rival programs. 

WolverineMan1988

October 10th, 2017 at 12:46 PM ^

Dantonio commented after the game that he saw 40 different formations in the first half.  Obviously he was exaggerating a bit, but does anyone else think our offense is just a bit too complicated right now?  As many have pointed out, it doesn't seem like we have much of an identity or anything that we can do well consistently right now.  It looks like they just keep trying different things and hoping that something will eventually work.  

Also, the fade route to Eddie McDoom on the first possession was just dumb.  I'm okay with the wheel route on second down to a tall tight end.  However, it just doesn't seem like O'Korn has the kind of ball placement on those throws that you need to have.  Neither throw was remotely catchable for our guys.  

Ecky Pting

October 10th, 2017 at 2:20 PM ^

FWIW, Erik Swenson - now a RS Freshman at Oklahoma, listed at 6'5", 315 lbs. - has played in 3 games for the Sooners this year, including against the Buckeyes.

Pervez74

October 15th, 2017 at 11:39 AM ^

Truly very article writing! I like your site. Everybody make it end up being attractive to browse the document as well as enjoyable all at one time. Right now click here  Payday Loans Spring-Valley  Many thanks with regard to good info. Continue the good work.

Pervez74

October 19th, 2017 at 2:08 PM ^

Truly very article writing! I like your site. Everybody make it end up being attractive to browse the document as well as enjoyable all at one time. Right now click here  check cashing Ronkonkoma  Many thanks with regard to good info. Continue the good work.