Notre Dame Postgame Presser: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

Hoke presser 2

file

[Note: I wasn’t in South Bend, so this was all transcribed from the video provided by the Athletic Department’s site.]

Opening remarks:

“Obviously Notre Dame played a very good football game and we didn’t. You’ve got to give them a lot of credit. A lot of credit to what they did on third downs, either defending us or their third down opportunities that they converted on.

“We’ve got to go back to work, and we will as a team. You don’t want to have four turnovers in a game. That doesn’t help you. The red zone, we didn’t help ourselves in there. From the penalty side, we put ourselves behind the sticks offensively. And again, you’ve got to give them a lot of the credit too. But we will bounce back because this is a very resilient, hard-working group of young men who know what it takes to win.”

After [Devin] Gardner started fairly quickly, I think six-for-six, and then did they bring more pressure, did your offensive line struggle; what fell apart?

“I think a little bit it’s never one guy, it’s never one piece of the offensive line, or the quarterback, or the routes, or whatever. When those things happen I think they happen as a team. He started six-for-six. I think we’ve got to give them- we crossed the fifty and they were going to bring more pressure. That’s what they did.”

 

Can you talk about Ray Taylor and any update on his status?

“I’m not going to talk about any of those injuries. Number one, I don’t know enough about them.”

 

And then Jabrill [Peppers], he dressed. Could he have played?

“If he could have played we would have played him. We evaluated all those guys before the game.”

And then you dressed him?

“Well, he went out because we were evaluating him before the game.”

 

You said you’re pretty confident this team will bounce back. How do they bounce back from such a- I mean, this was a pretty humbling loss here.

“Yeah, it is but I think they’ve all been humbled sometime in their life. It’s part of the resiliency this group has.”

 

Your guys were pretty adamant about how bad they wanted this because of this possibly being the last game. Were you surprised at how lopsided this ended up being?

“This game? Yeah.”

 

[After THE JUMP: Gardner is still the starter, why Countess was pulled, and bouncing back from adversity]

 

You talked about Devin [Gardner]. Did you ever consider pulling him at any point?

“No. No. I mean, he’s our quarterback. You know, unless he doesn’t come to work every day, doesn’t come to learn, all those things, he’s our quarterback. We wanted to put points on the board.”

 

Do you feel like he’s slipping into some of his habits he had last year? Holding onto the ball too long, or…

“Well, obviously- I don’t think he slipped into all those habits. I think he’s a better quarterback- I know he is. He’s a better quarterback than he demonstrated today.”

 

You talked about how this team will bounce back, but does it need something different? Does it need some changes from you as the head coach, or personnel-wise, or anything like that? I know immediate aftermath it’s hard to know.

“I think that it is hard to know. I think when you evaluate it, and we’ll evaluate it on the bus on the way home; you know, how guys played, who didn’t play well, who played well. You know, because there were some guys who played pretty well. Jake Ryan- I thought he played a pretty good football game. You could feel him out there. You know, Jack Miller did some good things when you watch that.

“The bad part was we got behind the sticks too many times and got out of rhythm offensively, because we were running the ball halfway decent. That was encouraging to see but then obviously, I think at halftime it turned into a game where we needed to throw it a little more”

 

Evertt Golson is a guy who didn’t even make it out of the first half the last time you guys faced him. He was considerably better tonight. What are the biggest differences you’ve seen in him going against him?

“Well, I think they also use him well. I think Brian [Kelly] does a good job. There’s a lot of three-step game in it, a lot of slants. I think he’s matured. I think I said that this week coming in that he’s a much better quarterback than he was two years ago just from watching the Rice game, and I would say the same thing after our game.”

 

You shuffled the secondary a lot.

“Some of that was because of injuries.”

But even taking out Blake [Countess] at one point. What did you see there that you didn’t really like?

“Well, we’ve played a lot of guys back there in the past. Stribling, we wanted to get him some live reps in there. Sometimes you take a guy out and he gets a chance to watch from the sidelines a little bit, and maybe he picks up a few things. We didn’t play well in man coverage. You get called for two interference calls- and we’ve got to play smarter- early and the guys get a little bit worried about playing press.”

 

This is I believe 0-4 against the big three rivals on the road over the last four years. What is this team missing? What does this team need to get over the hump?

“Winning. You win the game. You play. You don’t turn over the ball. You don’t give up big plays.”

Is this a mental thing at this point or what do you guys view this as?

“You talk about it enough into being a mental thing. I don’t think it’s a mental thing.”

What do you think it is?

“Just what I said. You can’t give up big plays. Can’t turn the ball over.”

 

When the game was that far out of reach, Gardner often puts his body in a position where he takes hits. He takes hits in the fourth quarter. Why were you playing him at that point?

“Because he’s our quarterback. He’s our quarterback. You know, we’re going to play some really big games on the road this year, and for him to keep improving he needs to play quarterback.”

Is it a risk, when he takes a hit like that?

“Anything’s a risk. To me, the risk was starting him maybe. I don’t know. We’re trying to develop a team.”

 

You might have touched on this a little bit already, but what specifically was your message to the team?

“After the game? Number one, give Notre Dame credit for how they played. It was a total butt kicking all the way around that we all took. Going back to work tomorrow as a team, like they will. And we’ve got to get a lot better. I think we learned some things that we’ve got to get better at.”

 

It looked like your quarterback was under pressure a lot and their quarterback wasn’t under pressure a lot. Was there a disparity in the trenches or was that scheme?

“I don’t know about that. He had to run enough. He did a good job evading a lot of rush, Everett did. And so I think there was pressure there. And sometimes it’s hard to get pressure on a three-step game.”

You mentioned that you feel like this team will bounce back. Adversity-wise, with a young team do you worry that they may get off track?

“I really don’t. Not with this team.”

Why?

“Because of what we’ve seen every day from them. I mean, from their work ethic, from how they care about each other. All those things.”

Devin [Gardner] took a good shot at the end. Is he okay?

“Like I said, I’ll talk about those injuries when I know more.”

Comments

dipshit moron

September 7th, 2014 at 12:24 PM ^

i feel  the same way. its so hard to criticize beacause it can seem personal. but  a coaches level of skill and talent is no different then players. all teams look good in their uniforms and going thru pregame. but once the game starts you can see the disparity in talent, the nicest and most wellspoken athlete can be an  average athlete. but just being nice isnt what this is about. these teams reflect their coach, just like every team does, coach holk  great man , very, very average coach..

soonerblue

September 8th, 2014 at 3:37 PM ^

been a blue fan a long long time, gets tiring falling short so often, if we smell the coffee (as opposed to roses) dont we realize that gardner is not a michigan quarterback? lets lose half of the rest of our season games with our back up qbs preparing for hopefully a brighter future and if gardner can show some sideline leadership, deal with adversity and then come in and contribute then wonderful for him, i do not blame him but it is time to do something more than the mediocre.............

GoBlueGladstone

September 8th, 2014 at 4:17 PM ^

...when you see what the product is. There is nothing that could explain, describe or assess that  "performance" in a coach's lexicon other than "owned." I really, really hate Notre Dame. They didn't even have the decency to be petty in victory. Always the disappoint with them.

JamieH

September 7th, 2014 at 12:16 PM ^

not giving out specific injury information.  But the blatent lying about injuries is just annoying.  It's obvious now why Peppers didn't come out for the 2nd half last week. 

 

Why should we ever believe anything Hoke ever says?  He just lies about everything.  His press conferences are just one giant lie-fest. 

nowayman

September 7th, 2014 at 12:18 PM ^

Keeping hush hush leading up to the ND game probably was the right choice (didn't go so well, I know).

There's no reason not to give one this week.  

I watched that Gardner hit after the fact because I had to turn off the tv.  I want to know how the kid is.  

RB's Mustache

September 7th, 2014 at 6:45 PM ^

For example, where was the amazing Drake Johnson from training camp? You'd think he was going to be the savior to our running game.

I learned nothing from this press conference as usual. He refuses to honestly assess anything. He either doesn't know or doesn't how how to say it constructively. 

I'll just assume from his team's performance he has no clue.

Rabbit21

September 7th, 2014 at 12:27 PM ^

When exactly has he proven he CAN turn it around. If anything last year should have proven things will only spiral downward from here. I'll believe in this team again, if they show a reason to believe in them. The players seem like good kids and I feel badly for them as I think they're going to get some abuse this week that they don't deserve.

Michigasling

September 7th, 2014 at 5:54 PM ^

How many of those "senior" quarterbacks played only one full year as a starting QB (the last heroic game on a broken foot) and only a possible snap or two more as a QB at all?  (Redshirted one year, WR another.)  How many of those senior quarterbacks learned the position under 2 different head coaches with completely different offensive approaches?  And now after one year developing as a starter, learning over again with a third O.C. with his own completely different approach?  

Too few people take into account muscle memory and the learning curve.  Amazing how much of an improvement he made the first game with his newly taught technique, admittedly against inferior competition.  I think we were all disappointed (understatement) in the team's showing last night, but DG, as mentioned below, was 6 for 6 before desperation set in because their defense covered our receivers while our defense couldn't stop theirs (or their QB), our kicking failed, protection broke down, etc., etc. 

It is a team effort, and the team still has work to do, but it's not on DG alone.  This is the very beginning of Devin's second year as a starting QB under a new OC.  Senior apples vs. senior oranges.

 

M-Dog

September 7th, 2014 at 12:35 PM ^

Exactly.  You can't pin this loss on the turnovers.  They were an unfortunate respone to losing big, not the cause of losing big.

The cause was the lines . . . our O-Line cound not prevent pressure and our D-Line could not get pressure.

We knew our O-Line was an issue.  What concerns me is our vaunted D-line.  It looked no better than the Kansas State game.  And unlike the O-Line, you can't rest assured that it will get better in the next two years becuase of more experience.

 

M-Dog

September 7th, 2014 at 1:01 PM ^

I really hope so.  We have been focused on the youth and inexperience of the O-line.  While doing this, we somehow comforted ourselves that this was no longer an issue on the D-Line.  

I actually hope it is still an issue on the D-Line, because if it's not and this is just their expected level of play, we are in trouble.

Also, our DB's are still not able to get the jams at the LOS that mess up a QB's 3-step drop.  

Our entire off-season plan . . . DB press at the LOS coupled with D-Line pressure is still not workable. 

Now what?

Shop Smart Sho…

September 7th, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

That was a question I had.  When the DBs weren't lined up 10 yards off the LOS, their first move almost always seemed to be backwards instead of into the receiver.  It was my understanding that press coverage involved getting your hands onto the receiver inside the first 5 yards, and not just being close to them.

Anyone with more knowledge of it feel like explaining?

maize-blue

September 7th, 2014 at 1:08 PM ^

Yup, the tight man coverage and D line/blitzing LB pressure go hand in hand. If one fails the whole concept is out the window. Last night doesn't give you confidence that they will be able to play this style all year. Can you imagine what a guy like Hackenberg will do if he has time and we still can't cover?

mgoblue98

September 8th, 2014 at 12:03 AM ^

D line play is important whether you are playing press man or zone.  If you can't/ don't get push when playing zone, the opposing quarterback will generally just pick it apart.  (Against a team with a mobile QB, staying in your rush lanes while getting push is very important whether you're in man or zone.)  From what little I saw from the highlights and live in the ND game, Michigan abandoned the press part of their man coverage after questionable PI calls.  I don't know if this was the coaches decision or just player reaction, but in my opinion it would have been better to be flagged for two dozen PI's rather than play man without pressing.  In addition, it looked like Frank Clark was the only defensive lineman getting consistent push/ pressure on the quarterback. 

There's nothing wrong with playing zone, in fact you can play press in zone as well as in man, but you still have to be able to control the line of scrimmage and pressure the QB.  For what it's worth, I have seen plenty of criticism on this board in the past when Michigan played bend but don't break zone.

My hope is that Michigan continues to play press man with Cover 2, 3 and 4 concepts mixed in.  Of course, my hope is predicated on not having any more injuries to the corners.

dragonchild

September 7th, 2014 at 1:44 PM ^

Turnovers were the story of the second half, which counts.  They killed three meaningful drives. Here's a rough game log:

ND - 14 yards, punt
UM - 47 yards, missed FG
ND - PI, PI, 71 yards, TD.  UM's DBs play scared the rest of the game
UM - 45 yards, missed FG
ND - 19 yards, punt
UM - 29 yards, punt
ND - 80 yards, TD
UM - 3-and-out, punt
ND - 56 yards, TD.  Skipping UM's last drive of the half
UM - INT at UM 39
ND - -4 yards, punt
UM - 30 yards, punt
ND - 61 yards, TD.  JMFR gets roughing the passer on 3rd and 11
UM - 45 yards, fumble
ND - 6 yards, punt
UM - INT at UM 26
ND - 0 yards, FG
UM - 20 yards, punt
ND - 6 yards, punt
UM - 24 yards, turnover on downs
ND - 8 yards, punt.  UM's last pick was inconsequential

That's not domination.  That's not even close to domination.  ND had the only sustained TD drives of the day but only their 80-yard TD drive strucks me as hard-earned.  After their last TD they couldn't even get first downs to run out the clock.  Their last four drives were 6, 0, 6 and 8 yards.  UM had only one three-and-out, three drives longer than 40 yards and came away with bupkus, to say nothing of the insta-turnovers.  It was just a really, really crappy game but it's not like line play (as bad as it was) was the disaster everyone's making it out to be.  It was more like watching a brat kick a guy who collapsed from a heart attack and that was REALLY exasperating.  ND was up 21-0 at the half and Gardner panicked.  Michigan's got serious problems, line play included, but ND was the beneficiary of bad officiating AND sloppy play AND good luck and watching them parade around like they're hot stuff giving out some epic beatdown made it unbearable.

VikingDiet

September 7th, 2014 at 10:15 PM ^

I think this PERFECTLY captures how I felt about the game after the shock wore off. It was a slow, painful death. It wasn't domination.

My thoughts because I am special:

- Oline play was not as bad as people think. I think decision making on the part of the QB and RBs played a role in how they appeared to play. Miller held up better than expected.

- Hard to get pressure on three step drops and quick slants. There were missed opportunities for sacks (I think Frank Clark missed two from the backside), but for the most part Gholson put the ball right where he should and got rid of it QUICK (something we don't do). I think we show blitzes too early, which allows those plays to succeed.

- DG is not a good quarterback so far this year. He is a good athlete, but I don't see a good quarterback. When his primary receivers are open, he does great, but no check downs, poor decision making when a play breaks down, nothing that indicates a good quarterback.

- Penalties were costly and the no-calls were pretty bad. Pass interference in the endzone was complete BS, Jake Ryan roughing was crap. Those things make a difference. Outside of the immediate impact, it affects how players perform and kills momentum. What would be a great defensive stop turns into a deflating new set of downs. We were held continuously on the defensive line. A lot of holding that wasn't called.

- Gotta get our kicking game in order holy fuck. What happened? Missed field goal and a complete SHANK and absolutely horrendous punting. Totally unacceptable.

 

I was shocked and disappointed like everyone else, but like most other people I think we all this sense that weird things happen in this game, especially in South Bend.

DocV313

September 8th, 2014 at 12:25 PM ^

I disagree, we were dominated.Those four ND drives you cited were when ND was up 28-0. They were just being conservative. Us moving the ball in the second half is also ND being conservative. Plus at halftime we were down 21-0 and never turned the ball over . I don't think the O-line play was that bad, but the D line and whole D for that matter were abysmal! CB's couldn't jam, no pressure, poor tackling.

Jringo25GOBLUE

September 7th, 2014 at 12:19 PM ^

Embarrassing game.. How about stop clapping down the sideline & put some fire,will, determination, pride in these players.. They looked FLAT and intimidated . Deer in the headlights.. Wake up or it's gonna be a long long season

StraightDave

September 7th, 2014 at 12:20 PM ^

 

 

 

Four times yesterday on offense.  Hoke had all fricking summer to put together a plan for this game and failed miserably.  This game was a perfect opportunity to put UM back on the football map and Hoke blew it big time.

 

Shop Smart Sho…

September 7th, 2014 at 1:11 PM ^

I don't know about anyone else, but it looks as though the offense is still running the WAY Hoke wants it to.  The lack of tempo, the reliance on TEs who can't both block and catch, the runs up the middle, and the lack of 4 WR sets all seem like the Hoke approach to football.  Those don't match up with what we saw from Nuss at his previous stops.

This feels like a repeat of RR forcing his DC to run a 3-3-5 when that isn't what they were comfortable with.  Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

umfan323

September 7th, 2014 at 12:21 PM ^

I wasn't expecting a win but I wasn't expecting a blowout.. I'm not going to blame Hoke , we started out fairly well . We missed 2 FGs that turned the momentum then the play calling was bad .. it seemed like ND had consistent pressure and the Nuss didn't do anything to switch it up the play calling seemed repetitive.. No deep passes to get the DBs to play off, no screen plays to get the D line to think about not just rushing up field.. Then on D I wish we played more zones we played too much man coverage , we didn't give Gholston much to think about and he beat us.. 

umchicago

September 7th, 2014 at 1:51 PM ^

hoke goes for it on 4th and one at the ND 40 but then tries to attempt a 48 yard FG on 4th and one at the ND 31.  very dumb, imo, especially in a hostile environment with a somewhat unproven kicker. 

that sapped a lot of steam out of the team.  you could see it on the faces on the sidelines; despite hoke's clapping.