Nebraska Postgame Presser Transcript: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Heiko

"I passed your floor on the way up, and now I'm passing it on the way down, and I don't think I'll be taking this elevator again." - Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon

---------------------

There’s probably some degree of frustration on the team. Can you talk about the number of missed opportunities on the field?

“Yeah. You know, frustration because we lost as a team. Yeah. It’s a frustration that we all have. I have to do a better job coaching this football team. The effort was really – guys were working, guys were fighting, guys were doing things. Did we do them well enough? No. And that goes on me.”

Seven sacks this week. How do you keep Devin’s spirits up?

“His spirits will be up because he’s a competitor. He’s going to be sore, and that’s part of it. Again, I have to do a better job coaching.”

When you talk about coaching, we do have to ask about the play calling from Al Borges. Do you have to look at that much more closely this week?

“I like the play calling. I think we thought we could do some things and we didn’t.”

Did you hear the booing after some of those offensive plays?

“Well, that’s you know, that’s the way things are.”

What’s Thomas Gordon’s situation?

“He had a little bit of an ankle. He played on the punt team. We also thought Courtney [Avery] and Josh [Furman] could give us something. And Jarrod [Wilson].”

What did you think you got from the safeties?

“I think it was okay. I don’t know until I watch it.”

Negative 69 rushing yards over the last two games. How do you explain that?

“Well, it’s hard to explain, isn’t it? I’ve got to do a better job coaching those guys.”

MGoQuestion: What kind of adjustments were you hoping to make over the course of last week as well as during this game?

“Well, you always have a plan that you think is going to work, number one. We change the plan all the time every week. I think there were some things that we did pretty well. But there were a number of things that we have to do a better job coaching the kids on.”

Can you talk about not cashing in on the turnovers?

“Well, we didn’t. We just didn’t execute.”

It looked like Devin really struggled scrambling. Is he banged up?

“His legs and everything are fine. I don’t know if he took a shot over there near their sideline. I think it was the second quarter. I thought he was fine.”

Was there fatigue on defense during the last drive?
“I don’t think so. Because of the number of plays guys are playing? No.”

What do you attribute it to?

“I have to do a better job of coaching.”

You have blocking issues all across the board.

“I don’t know about all across the board, but there’s some blocking issues.”

Why is that not progressing? If anything, it looks like it’s regressing.

“I’ve got to do a better job of coaching, it looks like. We’ve got to do a better job of what we’re doing and look at what we’re doing.”

You said you did some things good and some things not good. What were some of the things that were good?

“That were better as a team? Well defensively after the first quarter they settled in. Did a good job. I think they were 6 of 16 on third down. Most of the third downs – you want them all, but the critical ones, we needed to execute a little better on.”

How much does it hurt to see the home winning streak end?

“Home winning streak, away winning streak, any winning streak, you’re disappointed when it’s not there.”

Taco played today. What did you like about him?

“He’s been fortunate enough that he’s been able to improve over the course of the year without having to take full time snaps in a lot of critical situations. We just like how he’s come along. It’s about the right time for him because of how he’s come along to play.”

Is interior defensive line where he can play more?

“That was all in the nickel packages, sub packages. He’s still an outside end, but he’s got the length and the size and as good of quickness as anybody. He’s pretty good inside when you get in the sub packages.”

You were able to generate some offense with some screens and quick passes. Is that something you have to look at more?

“Last week we had that different screen in that we thought was going to be pretty good, and [Michigan State] sniffed that one out pretty good. This new one today was hitters but not consistent hitters. It’s something we tried to do. We threw the rocket to Gallon the one time, hit the windows route one time in there. Some of that stuff, it helps you a little bit, but at the same time, there’s some of it that’s similar when you look at what they did and what we did.”

At some point, do you have to admit that you can’t run the ball and not beat your head against the wall?

“I agree. And yes, you can do that.”

Is Devin holding the ball too long?

“Well I think any time you have negative plays either way, and let me go back to [the previous question]. The negative plays are what kill you on third down. First down negative plays, we snapped the ball again a little high. That was a 10-yard loss, so now you’re second and 20. I think as you watch the tape, he may have held it too long once or twice. I think you also coverage-wise, you have to give them a little credit also. They did a pretty good job on some of the coverage things that they did with Gallon and Funchess.”

You said you needed to do a better job coaching. In what area specifically?

“Just … everything.”

How did you think the other young guys played on defense?

“Willie started last week and played well. Again, I think you get a chance to look at it and grade it and do all that stuff. I know Willie [Henry] made some plays again, which is a good sign. I think Taco forced the sack that Cam got. Did a nice job on a gain. Also did a nice job on a run play in there. Until you really look at it, it’s hard I think for you to make an evaluation that’s fair.”

You mentioned the negative plays that hurt you on third down. What do you attribute that to?

“Because we had negative plays on first down.”

Those have increased, too. What do you attribute it to?

“I think you attribute it to the opponent did a good job, and I have to do a better job coaching our team.”

Looked like the running backs struggled in pass protection.

“That’s something we’re trying to get fixed to be honest with you. Is it a concern? Yeah. It always is. Not tackling, not blocking, not covering. Not throwing the ball, not running good routes. All that stuff is concerning.”

Are you concerned that you’re running out of practice time because it’s November?

“No, because we have three opportunities left. Two of them on the road, one here. Would we like to have played better? Yes. Would we like to have run the ball better? Yes. Would we like to have done a good job on third downs? Yes. And we’ve just got to go to work and keep working at it.”

Did Nebraska bring more pressure than you thought they would?

“I thought they brought a little more.”

What’s the most important thing you need to do as a coach?

“Right now it’s this team being a team. From a staff standpoint and a team standpoint. I tell you, they practiced their tails off. Tuesday and Wednesday they gave as good an effort as any team I’ve been around. The physicalness with which they attack each other and compete. We have to keep doing that.”

Comments

goblue2008

November 10th, 2013 at 9:12 PM ^

My concern goes beyond the playcalling and talent. It' seems like there is little development on the offensive line. I predicted a rough start for the offense give the youth on the o-line and that they would develop as the year went on. Same thing with the QB position. It seems like that development is not happening and that falls on coaching. I'm concerned that Hoke won't have the cojones to clean house of his bros from SDSU and FJ on offensive side of the ball. Another thing that I've seen since 2011 is poor game management from Hoke, especially at the end of half. I hope Hoke proves me wrong and that you're right.

Another thought I had as I sit on megabus back to Chicago from Ann Arbor is if there is good chemistry between the offensive coaches. What do you think?

MichiganStudent

November 10th, 2013 at 9:12 PM ^

This is so fucking stupid it's off the charts. Akron and UConn do not have more talent.

Also, 1-aa teams did better against MSU and Nebraska than we did. Do they have better talent too?

Sten Carlson

November 10th, 2013 at 9:23 PM ^

Wouldn't be surprised if they did.

Again, another guy suffering from the "Michigan Myth."

Trust me dude, I know it's hard to believe.  I grew up on AA, within earshot of the Big House.  I started going to games in 1976, I was family friends with Bob Ufer and his family, I sat next to Coach Carr's wife and daughter for 5 years, I am a Michigan alum.  Trust me, I know how hard it is to admit that the Michigan you think you're seeing ain't the Michigan it used to be, and it hasn't been since 2005.  Sucks, but it's true. 

Hoke knows what Michigan was, he was there at it peak in '97.  He's bringing it back, but until it's there, it's going to be too frustrating to bear if you don't let go of your attachment to the Myth.

CompleteLunacy

November 11th, 2013 at 12:32 PM ^

I am skeptical about you saying things like "Uconn and Akron's talent is better than michigans" because I don't think that's strictly-speaking true, and I don't think it's effective to just say "trust me" to the internetz.

However, I  do think you have a good point here. People look at our roster and think we have talent oozing everywhere when the reality is the gap is not near as high as we think, not even by Michigan's previous standards under Carr (that we were bemoaning at the time because it still wasn't to the level of the OSU's and Alabama's of the world). 

 

mGrowOld

November 10th, 2013 at 9:16 PM ^

While I dont agree with your assessment of our talent level vs that at Akron or U Conn I do love that you are honestly and genuinely upbeat about the team and our prospects going forward.

You are a nice counter to the negative nancy's like me.

Sten Carlson

November 10th, 2013 at 9:51 PM ^

Thanks mGrow! 

Here's how it broke down.

Michigan became "sick" as a program somtime after 1997, I'm not exactly sure when it began, but for whatever reason, Michigan didn't make key changes to it's techniques, facilities, and it started to get locked out of its most fertile recruiting ground, Ohio.  It began slowly, almost imperceptably.  Then 2005 happened, and Michigan suffered through three times the number of season ending surguries than it had historically.  It was at this point that Carr wanted out, and things should have been changed, IMO.  Carr stayed, but major and much needed rennovations didn't get completed, and Tressle basically put a fence around Ohio and kept Michigan out.  Years like 2006 masked the issues, but they were festering just below the surface.  I remember thinking that with Henne, Hart, Long, Manningham, etc. coming back, we had a legit shot at the NC in 2007.  Then, THE HORROR!

RR comes in, and despite what anyone says, the cupboard was as bare as bare can be.  2008, like 2005 was a lost class.  2009's class, this season's 5th year seniors, was also weak and suffered horrible attrition.  People forget it's not only the star power of the class that is important, but it is a staff's ability to redshirt (because they have ample depth) and to RETAIN those players that matters maybe even more.  How many guys from the 2009 class are there on the roster today?  2010, another weak class with a pretty high level of attrition.

Hoke's first class in 2011 was weak due to the timing of the coaching change.  Fortunately, the 2012 and 2013 classes have been highly ranked, and thus far they've redshirted en mass, and most have remained on the roster.  Michigan is playing a lot of guys that just flat out aren't good, and if not for the roster/depth issues and lack of talented upperclassmen, would NEVER play for an historical Michigan team.

Building a quality roster, like MSU has done has very little to do with continually having "elite" classes.  It has to do with getting guys to work hard, and keeping them in the program as long as possible.  The attrition that Michigan suffered from 2005 onward, and especially from 2008 - 2010 is off the chart high, and is really what is causing the issues today.  Hence, the "Michigan Myth."  It wasn't there.  People THOUGHT it was there, and they got impatient with RR because they refused to admit it wasn't there.

Now, I agreed with firing RR because he wasn't doing enough to rectify the backend roster issues that were the real problem.  Hoke comes in, he and Brandon nail down the issue -- OL/DL recruiting -- and he gets to work refilling the roster with quality OL/DL recruits.  In the mean time, he's dealing with a "default" roster.  Sucks, and there are a long list of people to blame, but NONE of them are Brady Hoke.

blusage

November 10th, 2013 at 7:49 PM ^

Football ain't rocket science. We've all watched enough football to know good coaching when we see it -- and we haven't seen it. It's not like, oh, they're coaching-professionals so we should defer to what they think.

Screw that. If it walks, talks, and quacks like a duck...it's a duck, regardless of what the zookeeper is telling you. Michigan is an embarrassment because Hoke can't coach. Michigan deserves better: better than Hoke, Carr, even Bo. Until we start winning NCs or are regularly and legitimately in the hunt, then we can't claim to be up there with Alabama, LSU, USC, OSU, etc. Gotta wake up and smell the coffee.

trueblueintexas

November 10th, 2013 at 7:55 PM ^

As someone who has done countless media interviews, I would suggest not getting worked up over the repetitive non-responses. It's what you are trained to do. There is one thing missing that does concern me. There is absolutely nothing being offered up to encourage people there is an awareness of what could be done better. In a difficult (crisis, if you will) time like this, it is important to weave in a few statements which are confident building to go along with the platitudes for people to believe you really know what you are talking about. It doesn't require giving any secrets up, it doesn't require throwing anyone under the bus. I really hope someone brings up the quotes from Nebraska's DE about knowing what was coming based on tendencies during tomorrow's press conference. I would really like to hear Hoke's and Borges' comments about that. That will tell you if this coaching staff really knows what is going on or not.

M-Dog

November 10th, 2013 at 8:06 PM ^

"I like the play calling"

Has he not been paying attention???  We have lost 5 games during his tenure exclusively because of play calling:

 - 2011 MSU

 - 2011 Iowa

 - 2012 OSU

 - 2013 PSU

 - 2013 Nebraska

The difference between winning and losing in these games had nothing to do with talent or experience, it was all play calling.  We could have won with who we had on the field.

The most frustrating thing In every one of these games was that they each had significant stretches of good play calling . . . good enough to win.  But it was like there was an artificial quota on good play calling.  That stretches of bad play calling were somehow required as part of some Frankenstein football mad experiment. 

The strangest thing is that Borges actually does know how to call good plays that will work well with the players he has on the field.  But he refuses to consistently do it, as if to call what works easily is somehow beneath him.

I used to make fun of Charlie Weiss at ND because you could always count on him to do something stupid to show how smart he was.  Borges has a lot of that in him.

 

Indiana Blue

November 10th, 2013 at 9:10 PM ^

Al Borges is clueless about calling a complete game.  It easy to "look" like you know what you're doing if the results are good ... but I conclude now that this has been, and will continue to be just dumb luck.  

Crunch time - 4th quarter, tie game and BOOM - Nobraska muffs a punt.  It is the BREAK of the game!  So what does Borges call .... he simply repeats the lunacy of the PSU game.  I was at PSU and I was there yesterday and I could not believe my EYES.  The guy is FUCKING CLUELESS ...  There are people in this world that when the moment is there - they make things happen.  Al Borges AIN'T one of those people.   I'm looking at the rushing statistics on the scoreboard (-20) and he calling for fucking running plays.

In any court in the land - this guy would be convicted of pretending to be an offensive coordinator.

brianshall

November 10th, 2013 at 8:10 PM ^

Three years in and this is what Hoke delivers? 

Embarrassing.

He can say lots of words, the results don't lie. 

He's got to go. 

It's no longer about Hoke, it's about Brandon now. 

trueblueintexas

November 10th, 2013 at 8:25 PM ^

I'm not going to enter the whole RR vs. Hoke debate which is starting to develop on this blog. I will provide some other perspective. Which fan base do you think feels better about their team and coaching staff right now, Michigan or Minnesota? Think about that for a while.

Sten Carlson

November 10th, 2013 at 9:07 PM ^

"RR was also 15-22, opened with a school record 9 loss season, and made it to one bowl game (where we were blown to bits).  Hoke is 25-10, opened with an 11-2 season and BCS bowl win, and has made it to a bowl 3 times in a row--narrowly losing to a talented SC team last season.

The comparison of RRs results to Hoke's is simply laughable."

 -- Soulfire21

I couldn't say it any better. 

Mgo-Bo

November 10th, 2013 at 10:16 PM ^

He took u of m from relevant but stagnant under Carr to the worst team in college football in 3 years. How again is hoke worse? If rich rod didn't have denard to bail him out where would we be now?
Rich rod inherited an actual michigan program.

Ball Hawk

November 10th, 2013 at 8:59 PM ^

One thing that bothers me about Hoke is that he makes some very bad calls during the game. Time outs and game adjustments are really bad. To me, you can't teach that and if he doesnt get it then it will hurt us down the road in a big game.

BayWolves

November 10th, 2013 at 9:12 PM ^

FYI i would like to see Hoketake the MAck Brown approach immediately and make changes now. I'd also liek to see Bryant and Kalis back in the lineup at guard. At least they seem tougher right now than the two currently starting.

CompleteLunacy

November 11th, 2013 at 1:01 PM ^

BS like this drives me nuts. Nobody is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to watch Michigan football. If it's THAT painful, then go find a new hobby. 

Either that, or you're lying. And if you're lying, you're being melodramatic and hyperbolic. Not much better.

And I'm sorry to single just you out, because there are many responses on this board close to this "woe is me" mentality. 

 

 

uminks

November 10th, 2013 at 10:26 PM ^

Going 6-6 will be awful ,since the coaching staff have would have failed by  not improved this team as the season has progressed. I don't see much of an improvement in 2014, may be 7-5 or 8-4! O-line will even be more of a tire fire. I suppose the defense could improve. I hope Green can develop at RB. Wow, Gardner will sacked like crazy next season! Oh may be we will be good in 2015? If not, Hoke and his staff should be shown the door if we don't win 9 or more games in '15!

Blue in Yarmouth

November 11th, 2013 at 6:30 AM ^

Not the content, but the direction this whole thing is going. Only a couple of months ago the discussion was how soon we would be in the NC picture and the talk was 14 or 15. Now people are saying they won't be happy with less than 9 wins in 15, which was supposed to be our NC year, at the latest.

I should make clear that by funny, I mean sad.

BlowGoo

November 10th, 2013 at 10:28 PM ^

Mods, there's something wrong with the website.  I keep clicking the headline for THIS week's postgame press conference, but I think what I'm reading is from LAST week's postgame press conference,

mgoblue98

November 10th, 2013 at 11:08 PM ^

The thing I see with Borges is that at times he seems to design a game plan that is based on what the other team doesn't do well rather than what Michigan does well or best. Running I form big against Iowa in 2011 is a good example along with a bunch of games this year where the game plan seems to be to establish the running game. Michigan doesn't have the ability at this point to be a good running team so why keep doing it. Do what the team does best. It is telling that several teams have said that they knew what Michigan's tendencies were. That reminds me of the offenses under Lloyd Carr in the last decade. That has to change.

AMazinBlue

November 10th, 2013 at 11:28 PM ^

That would explain a lot.  I'm really starting to think that this staff is in waaayyyy over their heads.  Hoke gives the same answers to every question.  Which leads me to believe none of the coaches has a clue how to fix what's wrong with this team.  This is so much more than youth. 

This could end worse than the RR era.  This is starting to look like the perverbial train wreck that you want to turn away from, but can't help looking and watching in dumb-founded awe.

Blue in Yarmouth

November 11th, 2013 at 6:23 AM ^

Honestly, how can you say that? Under RR we saw progress as a team and in the standings each and every year, while with this staff we have regressed each year.

I honestly think that if DB had forced RR to hire a new (and good) DC rather than let him go we would be in a better place now than we are under this staff and I don't say that with any joy at all, because I wanted him gone after the bowl loss as well. The difference is I'm not to big to admit I may have made a mistake.

Given what we witnessed under RR there is no good reason to think we wouldn't have continued improving, especially if his hand was forced on defence. With this staff on it's current makeup there's no good reason to think that we won't continue regressing. I just hope DB gives Hoke the choice he never have RR which is find a new offensive staff or hit the road. I also hope BH is smart enough to take it, because another head coaching search isn't what this team needs this soon.

c1s2m0466

November 10th, 2013 at 11:37 PM ^

I can give Hoke credit for is that he never throws anyone under the bus. Coaches or players. I think that helps I recruiting when players and parents see and hear that. How he develops that talent will be the key to keeping his job in one or two years. At this point it doesn't look good but at least this regime of Brandon will give him ample time to do it unlike Rich Rod. Don't know what else to say. Good luck Coach Hoke. I am going to try to force myself to be a casual observer for the rest of the season and decompress.

buddhafrog

November 11th, 2013 at 1:15 AM ^

The problem is not entirely the play calling, but rather the formations in which the plays are called (OK, and the play calls as well).  But we are tipping our hand so obviously to what is coming on run plays or by down-and-distance habits by our beloved Borges.  The combination just sets these kids up to fail terribly.  And they do.  And they lose heart b/c they are being destroyed and lose all confidence.

All that is to say: Fire Borges for the love of Bo.

Sugaloaf

November 11th, 2013 at 3:05 AM ^

In watching the press conf on mgovideo, it seemed that Wojo was the only one really pushing Hoke re: not being able to run at all. Is it respect for Hoke that most writers aren't asking the tough questions? Are the writers worried about backlash? It seems odd to me that no one else is forcing the question of "how can you be putting your kids in such bad plays considering their strengths and still say you're happy w the play calling?"

As a writer I would think forcing him to answer some tough questions would be satisfying journalism.

Thoughts? What's the mood amongst the writers? Where's their toughness?

uncleFred

November 11th, 2013 at 8:37 AM ^

It was mentioned last week that there was a story that Brandon watches the game film with the coaches every Sunday. Assuming that's true, I think that all of you calling for Hoke's or Borges' or Funk's head, better strap in for a long season. It is inconceivable that Brandon is unaware of the exact issues that plague the team and the exact steps that the coaching is staff is taking to address them. If those steps did not have Brandon's explicite support, then the coaches would take other steps. 

To be clear, I am not saying that Brandon is coaching the team, only that he is fully aware and supportive of the coaches and the way they are approaching the issues with the team. I'm also certain that were Hoke, or Mattison, or Borges remotely close to the clueless stooges that is repeatedly claimed here, that coach would already be gone.

This is the reason that I have some confidence that Hoke gets at least until the end of 2015 to fix this and perhaps all six years of his contract.