A get that Hoke puts on his best PR face when doing press conferences but I'd like to just hear him admit that things aren't going well and they need to take a serious look at things. I hate hearing "We need to execute" and "I liked the play calling" and "I have to do a better job coaching". Those are all great for not giving any juicy quotes to the media but it's frustrating to hear every single week that they publically refuse to admit anything is seriously awry
Nebraska Postgame Presser Transcript: Brady Hoke
"I passed your floor on the way up, and now I'm passing it on the way down, and I don't think I'll be taking this elevator again." - Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon
There’s probably some degree of frustration on the team. Can you talk about the number of missed opportunities on the field?
“Yeah. You know, frustration because we lost as a team. Yeah. It’s a frustration that we all have. I have to do a better job coaching this football team. The effort was really – guys were working, guys were fighting, guys were doing things. Did we do them well enough? No. And that goes on me.”
Seven sacks this week. How do you keep Devin’s spirits up?
“His spirits will be up because he’s a competitor. He’s going to be sore, and that’s part of it. Again, I have to do a better job coaching.”
When you talk about coaching, we do have to ask about the play calling from Al Borges. Do you have to look at that much more closely this week?
“I like the play calling. I think we thought we could do some things and we didn’t.”
Did you hear the booing after some of those offensive plays?
“Well, that’s you know, that’s the way things are.”
What’s Thomas Gordon’s situation?
“He had a little bit of an ankle. He played on the punt team. We also thought Courtney [Avery] and Josh [Furman] could give us something. And Jarrod [Wilson].”
What did you think you got from the safeties?
“I think it was okay. I don’t know until I watch it.”
Negative 69 rushing yards over the last two games. How do you explain that?
“Well, it’s hard to explain, isn’t it? I’ve got to do a better job coaching those guys.”
MGoQuestion: What kind of adjustments were you hoping to make over the course of last week as well as during this game?
“Well, you always have a plan that you think is going to work, number one. We change the plan all the time every week. I think there were some things that we did pretty well. But there were a number of things that we have to do a better job coaching the kids on.”
Can you talk about not cashing in on the turnovers?
“Well, we didn’t. We just didn’t execute.”
It looked like Devin really struggled scrambling. Is he banged up?
“His legs and everything are fine. I don’t know if he took a shot over there near their sideline. I think it was the second quarter. I thought he was fine.”
Was there fatigue on defense during the last drive?
“I don’t think so. Because of the number of plays guys are playing? No.”
What do you attribute it to?
“I have to do a better job of coaching.”
You have blocking issues all across the board.
“I don’t know about all across the board, but there’s some blocking issues.”
Why is that not progressing? If anything, it looks like it’s regressing.
“I’ve got to do a better job of coaching, it looks like. We’ve got to do a better job of what we’re doing and look at what we’re doing.”
You said you did some things good and some things not good. What were some of the things that were good?
“That were better as a team? Well defensively after the first quarter they settled in. Did a good job. I think they were 6 of 16 on third down. Most of the third downs – you want them all, but the critical ones, we needed to execute a little better on.”
How much does it hurt to see the home winning streak end?
“Home winning streak, away winning streak, any winning streak, you’re disappointed when it’s not there.”
Taco played today. What did you like about him?
“He’s been fortunate enough that he’s been able to improve over the course of the year without having to take full time snaps in a lot of critical situations. We just like how he’s come along. It’s about the right time for him because of how he’s come along to play.”
Is interior defensive line where he can play more?
“That was all in the nickel packages, sub packages. He’s still an outside end, but he’s got the length and the size and as good of quickness as anybody. He’s pretty good inside when you get in the sub packages.”
You were able to generate some offense with some screens and quick passes. Is that something you have to look at more?
“Last week we had that different screen in that we thought was going to be pretty good, and [Michigan State] sniffed that one out pretty good. This new one today was hitters but not consistent hitters. It’s something we tried to do. We threw the rocket to Gallon the one time, hit the windows route one time in there. Some of that stuff, it helps you a little bit, but at the same time, there’s some of it that’s similar when you look at what they did and what we did.”
At some point, do you have to admit that you can’t run the ball and not beat your head against the wall?
“I agree. And yes, you can do that.”
Is Devin holding the ball too long?
“Well I think any time you have negative plays either way, and let me go back to [the previous question]. The negative plays are what kill you on third down. First down negative plays, we snapped the ball again a little high. That was a 10-yard loss, so now you’re second and 20. I think as you watch the tape, he may have held it too long once or twice. I think you also coverage-wise, you have to give them a little credit also. They did a pretty good job on some of the coverage things that they did with Gallon and Funchess.”
You said you needed to do a better job coaching. In what area specifically?
“Just … everything.”
How did you think the other young guys played on defense?
“Willie started last week and played well. Again, I think you get a chance to look at it and grade it and do all that stuff. I know Willie [Henry] made some plays again, which is a good sign. I think Taco forced the sack that Cam got. Did a nice job on a gain. Also did a nice job on a run play in there. Until you really look at it, it’s hard I think for you to make an evaluation that’s fair.”
You mentioned the negative plays that hurt you on third down. What do you attribute that to?
“Because we had negative plays on first down.”
Those have increased, too. What do you attribute it to?
“I think you attribute it to the opponent did a good job, and I have to do a better job coaching our team.”
Looked like the running backs struggled in pass protection.
“That’s something we’re trying to get fixed to be honest with you. Is it a concern? Yeah. It always is. Not tackling, not blocking, not covering. Not throwing the ball, not running good routes. All that stuff is concerning.”
Are you concerned that you’re running out of practice time because it’s November?
“No, because we have three opportunities left. Two of them on the road, one here. Would we like to have played better? Yes. Would we like to have run the ball better? Yes. Would we like to have done a good job on third downs? Yes. And we’ve just got to go to work and keep working at it.”
Did Nebraska bring more pressure than you thought they would?
“I thought they brought a little more.”
What’s the most important thing you need to do as a coach?
“Right now it’s this team being a team. From a staff standpoint and a team standpoint. I tell you, they practiced their tails off. Tuesday and Wednesday they gave as good an effort as any team I’ve been around. The physicalness with which they attack each other and compete. We have to keep doing that.”
Mack Brown figured that out earlier this year and shook things up after a dismal start to stop the bleeding. If you are going to delegate the offense, I would hope nothing he is seeing is considered acceptable in any form.
Yes. It's a business. If I were a recruit and the CEO + the coach saying he's got to do a better job I'd be second guessing right now. The program is going backwards with no sign of "doing better". My guess here is that M is a class orginization, Al and Funk will not be canned this year. However with the players in the locker room there has to be be rumblings. We might lose on some commits and we may also see a transfer. At the end of the year Funk and Al would most likely render their resignation making it a class move for the betterment of the team. DB should be out looking to make plans for next year's replacments. As is any business the CEO to make their business plan and forecast to sit pat would be an insult to the players (associates). M is a Forbes 100 program in football, so run the business like one. Al...take this opp to retire in grace and provide hope for 2014 right after the season.
So many trite coaching platitudes. I'm numb. Just don't care anymore...
It's a start. Bear with me here.
I didn't go into this expecting any answers from Hoke. There's nothing he can reveal about what's going on the inside that would fix the problem or do anything other than further damage. This was an opportunity to see if Hoke knows that the way he's doing this is under more scrutiny and less patience. The terseness of his deflections tells me he gets it.
Look, I understand if some people get the impression he's not respecting us. Maybe, but believe me, no one talks this way unless they're intensely aware of the pressure that's on them, and to a coach that's basically their measure of job security. So as far as me hoping for progress, this is the start I've been waiting for. I did say during the awful showing at Akron I was hoping they'd lose (I was roundly called to be perma-banned) -- not because I wanted to see them lose, but because I knew if they won, it would take this long for them to get it. And it has, goddammit. I would rather have reached this point sooner rather than later, during the toughest month on the schedule.
I didn't become a Michigan fan last week. No coach likes to make wholesale changes on their homeboy crew, and if there's a future for this program it's going to require hitting rock bottom first. We're probably another 2-3 ugly losses away from that, unfortunately.
But if you're a long-term fan, well. . . this is the start. Let's see how it goes from here.
OK, I'll grant you a little latitude on this counselor. But just a little. His responses do seem a bit more tight/terse which may be read as an indication that he's actually feeling the heat. But by god there better be some tangible action (i.e. - coaching changes) come year-end or there won't be a torch or pitchfork to be had within a hundred miles of Ann Arbor. Hell hath no fury like a fanbase scorned.
The last three games (plus Pizza Bowl?) are going to be pure, unalduterated torture.
We all do. We care and we are reading this board because we care. Sometimes I wish I didn't because of the pain watching and listening to these inanities. Obviously coaching and excecution sucks!!
I expect the remaining teams on the schedule to blitz a lot more than their film has shown so far.
I did notice, as Hoke mentioned, some really poor tackling, too, on both the special teams and defense, that allowed players to get additional yards, in some cases quite substantial yards.
Since switching from #12 to #98 it has been going down hil! Just saying....l
Totally agree unlucky jersey! at least Charly Gordon had a lucky rabbit's foot!
Your comment made me go watch the presser. It reads differently than it does on video.
In reading this, you can sense the pressure he's under and Hoke's response seems to acknowledge the gravity of the situation.
However, in watching it, it Looks like he's holding back a smirk on the last couple of 'I've gotta do a better job coaching' comments.
People break tension with dry humor. Lloyd did the same thing. I would not read much into that in particular.
where did Hoke blame youth? He blamed himself.
He blamed the O-lines' struggles on youth the majority of the year. I think he recognizes he can't use the same excuse every week. He didn't really talk about execution this week. Coaching was the buzz word of the week.
Yeah, like what is your specific plan to "coach better"?
Is it new schemes? Is it return to old/simpler schemes? Is it different personnel? Is it trying to get the players to do something different? Is it to stop trying to get the players to do something different?
The players ain't changing. You got who you got. They're as old and as big and as fast and as experienced in November as they're going to be.
So what's the plan to "coach them better" . . . to win games against actual opponents that are trying to beat you, not just to look good in practice on Tuesday?
Putting aside the fact that it makes no sense for him to reveal those things publicly . . . it's a postgame press conference. Hoke hadn't seen the game film when he stepped to the podium.
Do you seriously believe what you wrote? RR was 3-9, 5,7 and 7-6. He lost the last three games of his tenure by 20, 30 and 38. Hoke has gone 11-2, 8-5 and 6-3 (pending). His teams have only been blown out by Alabama and MSU. Obviously Hoke's teams are not performing up to the standards that he's set for himself (or that we expect of them) but you simply can't compare three years of RR to three years of Hoke. As Brandon does his annual review, Hoke will get a pass. RR did not (and should not have).
Did you actually watch the entire years of RR offense or did you just catch the highlights package? Against any competent defense the RR offense looked silly. The defense looked bad against anyone. Put em together and he needed to go.
Hoke's offense has not looked terrible every year even against good teams. It has looked atrocious this year. The defense has looked excellent in a couple years and good in one. That's the nature of college football.
Comparing schedules and knowing who we faced each year, Rich Rod's schedule and record can't hold a candle to what Hoke did with his so far.
Definite, definite concerns about the offense and I'm now convinced Borges needs to immediately get better or leave, but you're crazy if you think Hoke should be fired even by holding him to some "objective" standard.
These are gues-timates so don't get in an uproar if I get the #s wrong. But didn't RR go 3-9, 5-7 and then 7-5. BH has gone 11-2, 8-5 and now ???.
My question is, how can DB justify not firing BH? Don't get me wrong, I hope to hell he doesn't fire him (I didn't want RR fired either for what its worth) I just wonder if DB knows the corner he painted himself in.
being that Hoke has been too successful? You mean if he had led the team to a 3-9 record, and then a 5-7 record, and then whatever this year, you would support his return for a fourth year?
Hoke could literally have gone winless this year and STILL have 4 more wins in 3 years than RR ever did.
My point is we cannot hold every coach to such a black-and-white 3-year standard of "wins trajectory", because it's not fair. It wasn't fair to RR either (but that was an exception...and there was plenty of blame to go around for it). And if the standard is as you say, it would be even more unfair to Hoke because of what he's done. He's been blown out TWICE in three years. He's won a BCS bowl. His team has certainly regressed this year, but if you're firing him then it looks even worse than the RR firing because as it is Hoke already has 10 more wins than RR did in the same time
You can talk about trajectory, but you can't ignore the reasons for that trajectory that are not coaching related. You can't ignore RR's "bare cupboard" in year 1 just like you can't ignore that 3 of Michigan's losses last year were to teams that had TWO combined losses among them the entire year (and one of those losses was the National Championship!), the fourth was because of playing Bellomy and the 5th was a hard-fought game against a very good SEC team.
Quite frankly, I think it's asinine that ANYONE would think Hoke should be fired based on the results of his first 3 seasons so far. Maybe his seat warms up next year based on this rather...underwhelming...season. But even if he loses the last 3 games...he's not getting fired, and he shouldn't get fired.
Sheesh. That was awful.
Hoke taking responsibility for the team, and not sticking a knife in Borges. He may be furious with the play calling, but he's the boss and he owns it regardless. Whatever issues Hoke had with the plays, he'll discuss it in private with Borges - not cut his legs out when he can't defend himself.
Don't read too much into these.
suggests he's much farther from the action than he is. He understands it, he's part of it, and he has signed off--every week--on the general approach. I think that Nebraska has/had a shitty D, and as with many of these games they have gone in believing that they could establish the run, at least a little. It hasn't worked, and that's on them--on everyone--but I'm convinced it's that simple. This is Hoke's team. Borges may well get shitcanned if the public uproar is great enough. But putting it all on him is blindness.
I'm saying. I think everyone expects him to come out n say Borges can rot in hell and die.
Well, that certainly would frame his stance on the debate. You're probably right. He might not be a "you rot in hell!" kind of guy.
Or is Borges just that stubborn and Hoke to dumb to know any better. This staff hasn't had an answer for the A gap blitz since they got here. Nebraska took the MSU game film and said hey this works and they have no idea how to stop it. We ran two screens that resulted in gains of 23 and 27 yards and then never ran another. Borges sucks plain and simple. Funk's Oline is way worse than RR's 2008 line that had very little experience and even less talent. How much should we appreciate Vincent Smith for his ability to pick up a blitz at 5'7" 168lbs.
While we're on the subject of appreciating former players, anyone who criticized Denard should probably tuck their tail between their legs. I mean, that guy's magic basically won us like half a dozen games over the past 2 seasons.
He should get as long as it takes to find someone better. Given our last two coaching searches, this could give him up to 5 years...but we should always be looking for something better.
A LITTLE MORE ACTION.
And less play action.
If your safeties play like shit then you won't know until you watch the film? Ok, so how do you adjust? Bullshit coach speak.
Play him only in plays that require him to sprint 50 yards downfield.
I call bs
"I've got to do a better job coaching" x 3, so at least there's that?
I was thinking the same thing. That type of top-down coach speak is much better than the bottom-up coach speak of the last few weeks.
normally those would be about excution. I call that progress for sure.
Why is it that, as soon as I start reading this, my mind immediately flashes to this guy circa 2002?
Does this mean our National title hopes are not alive?
Unless FBS football adopted the 68 team tournament format I'd say we're probably out of the running this year.
we will make that field, either....
Hoke preaches of accountability, so where is his? When does failure to execute fall on the coaches?
I'm guessing it's the part where he says he has to do better as a coach and where he blames the game on himself.
Well I suppose thats a step in the right direction, but week after week blaming execution is blaming the players.
every coach in the history of ever blames execution. It literally means nothing. He's not blaming the players anymore than himself and his fellow coaches when he says that.
Rod Marinelli did the same thing during that 0-16 season with the lions.
isn't saying it's on me to coach better--ad nauseum--exactly that?
Analogous to "sorry" saying "it's my fault" over and over eventually becomes worse because progress is obviously not being made. Don't say you're sorry/responsible, just fix it!
His new favorite line