My Floor Is The Ceiling Comment Count

Brian

3/6/2014 – Michigan 84, Indiana 80 – 23-7, 15-3 Big Ten

13022841924_0a89732cb2_z[1]

Hello. I shoot 69%. They gave me a hat. [Fuller]

Arizona's lost, Virginia's lost, Wisconsin's lost, Duke's lost, Michigan State's lost, everyone's lost. They've all done so against teams ranging from mediocre to horrible. Losing is not hard; not losing is super hard. Michigan hasn't lost but three times in an 18 game Big Ten schedule and won the league by a staggering three-game margin. That's hard.

Michigan's done this despite being "soft" by any reasonable definition. Poke an opposing fan in a bad mood and they will hurl this charge. It's hard to dispute. Michigan's defense hovers around 100th in Kenpom. Their rebounding is middling at best. They do not steal the ball or block shots; they're dead last in the league at preventing two pointers from going in. Tom Izzo looks ready to die and is throwing most of his team under the bus for being softbatch, and his outfit is second in the league.

Meanwhile, here are the conference records of teams that finished last in two-point defense in the past ten years: 4-14, 4-14, 7-11, 4-14, 9-9, 1-17, 2-14, 6-10, 1-15, 3-13, 2-14.

This is a parade of Carmody-era Northwestern teams and anybody-era Penn State with the occasional outlier thrown in. You may be familiar with one of those outliers. That 9-9 record was John Beilein's first tourney team at Michigan, Stu and Zack and Manny and a Crisler eruption. Michigan broke through with a statistical indicator that usually means you're Penn State. A bad version of Penn State. Michigan got to the second round of the tourney.

This year's league-worst two point defense annihilated what's statistically the best conference in the country. Last year Michigan took a defense that entered the NCAA tourney in the 70s and charged into the national title game.

This is not a normal thing. Every year, people pull profiles of past NCAA champions out and dismiss Michigan because they don't have enough defense. Michigan does not seem to notice. They are too busy playing NBA Jam.

-------------------------------

image

Michigan must be approaching the practical limit of offensive efficiency. Sometimes, like first halves against Nebraska and Illinois, they approach the theoretical limit.

Over the past decade only a half-dozen teams exceeded Michigan's current output, and they are generally 30 win teams: Chris Paul at Wake Forest, the uber-loaded 2009 Carolina squad that dismantled MSU in the title game, that one year Jon Diebler hit 50% from three off of Jared Sullinger kickouts. These teams are juggernauts, charging through major-conference regular seasons with two or three losses.

This year, the teams scraping the ceiling are not juggernauts. Creighton, Duke, and Michigan are probing these heights with the aid of the sometimes-goofy new rules, but they've all lost at least six games already. None will be top seeds. All have defenses ranging from 80th to 100th on Kenpom. All have offenses that are otherworldly.

Together they comprise a new version of contender, a major-conference version of three-point sniping underdogs. Each takes 40% of their shots from behind the line and connects on 40% of their attempts. The other teams at the top of the the three-point-make charts are more often Utah State and Drake than they are major conference teams.

This year, the feisty 12 shooting down a five-seed has migrated into the protected seeds, with all the rights and privileges therein. Chaos beckons. I've got no idea what's going to happen, but I know that it is going to be crazy. Stock up on subs.

Bullets

Hall of fame. If you get three encomiums in one career you're a MGoHall of Fame lock. Jordan Morgan has cleared the bar. He has been here for the entire building process and now stands at the top of the Big Ten, net in teeth. Those who stay will be champions. (And most of those who don't.) Hiring John Beilein was a good idea.

Anyway: Indiana came out with a gameplan that was essentially a Jordan Morgan diss track, starting 6'7" freshman Devin Davis and switching every screen. Morgan was not about to take that slap in the face on senior day. He posted, he rebounded, he kept Michigan in the game during the period where Indiana literally could not miss. He ended 7/8 from the floor with five offensive rebounds and a couple steals.

His makes showed an advanced knowledge of how to finish without the ability to play above the rim, especially the bucket on which one dribble led to a tight-angle layup around Vonleh. He just finished a season shooting 69% as a 6'8" non-leaper. Sure sure sure a lot of those were put on a platter for him, but there are a lot of guys who get things put on a platter for them who don't shoot anywhere near 69%. I mean, his ORtg is higher than anyone on the team other than Albrecht.

BONKERS. Speaking of ORTG, the worst on the team still belongs to Derrick Walton, and his number is 110, up 11 points from midseason. Indiana has one guy above that—Ferrell, obvs. Vonleh is just about tied with Walton.

Michigan's offense is just bonkers this year.

Obligatory photo of everyone else smiling because they did something spectacular and difficult as Jon Horford mediates or something. We would not let you down in a matter this important.

13022863454_c81e99f64a_z[1]

you may be on the court at Crisler after winning the Big Ten by three games
I am on the court as well
but I am also under the Banyan tree
inventing the world anew every moment [Fuller]

13023474174_338b76f854_c[1]

Will Sheehey can't check this no mo [Fuller]

Point guard on Stauskas: dead. Hail the Beilein adjustment matrix. Michigan started out against Michigan State by obliterating MSU's previous defensive strategy. A collection of back cuts and down screens got Michigan a bunch of looks at the basket and forced MSU to stop denying the perimeter. At that point Michigan could just run their offense, which was their offense and therefore ridiculous.

Michigan's Borg-like ability to adapt to phaser frequencies was also on display in this one. We spent the better part of a month fretting about opponents shutting down Nik Stauskas by sticking their point guards on him. This strategy was initiated in Michigan's loss at Assembly Hall (Yes That Assembly Hall). Stauskas again drew Ferrell. Results: 21 points on 17 shot equivalents, two assists, one turnover. Stauskas got quick post ups for buckets, drove past Ferrell, shot over Ferrell. Etc.

Stauskas has put up 25, 15, 21, 24, and 21 in his last five games. He's adapted to little guys in his grill, mostly by raining it in from three, but here the drives were also effective.

Zone. The 1-3-1 was the difference in the game. It shot Indiana's uncharacteristically low turnover rate into the stratosphere and didn't give up any worse shots than the man to man was. The 1-3-1 is inherently a high risk, high reward defense that does give up a lot of GRAHHHHH dunks, offensive rebounds, and open threes. It compensates by turning the opponent over. So when you're giving up a lot of GRAHHHHH dunks and open threes anyway, you might as well get some turnovers.

It is frustrating that Michigan did not try out a packed-in 2-3 and dare anyone not named Ferrell to raise up over it. They only have so much time to work on things, I guess, but given Indiana's struggles against a 2-3 it seems like it would have been something to try once it became apparent that dribble penetration was there for anyone who wanted it. 

Instead, the 1-3-1 worked just fine. Indiana had 12 second half turnovers, many of them forced by the zone and specifically Caris LeVert's ever-extending hands. He's only credited with two steals in the box score but his impact was much larger than that as the flypaper dude at the top.

Entering the tourney, having the 1-3-1 in Michigan's back pocket is a major asset, especially given that they're down to 93rd in defense on Kenpom. They may have to change what they're doing at some point when the man to man just isn't working.

13023605004_17e4c9bba7_c[1]

coachin' in a van down by the river [Bryan Fuller]

Clap on, Clappy. Michigan got the ball back up three with 39 seconds left. Indiana did not trap or press; they eventually fouled Spike Albrecht with 17 seconds left on the shot clock. Crean was apparently screaming at his team to foul for a good 10 seconds of that delay, even so that's just… wow. Let's just say I can't see a Beilein team not knowing that you should try to steal the ball and foul quickly in that situation.

GET OFF THE COURT, SCHRUTE. Crean actually shoved one of his players then forced the referee to box him out on one Indiana possession. Beilein had already been hit with a technical for saying something along the lines of "dagnabit," and Crean's on the court affecting the play. Nothing.

They've got to do something about this in the offseason. Dump your horrible charge changes* and actually enforce technicals against coaches who show up on the court. For the love of pants.

*[Semi-weekly charge bitching goes here. Adriean Payne had been set for a good two seconds on this "block":

Meanwhile, Spike Albrecht can't get a call because he's tiny and flies halfway across the arena when a 6'8" guy puts his shoulder into him. It looks like a flop because Spike Albrecht is tiny. And then Morgan gets a call on the 1-3-1 as he slides under Troy Williams after Williams is already in the air. They need to simplify the call, because the refs simply cannot make it.]

"DAGNABIT" works. Indiana got called for a bunch of travels in the second half after Beilein's tech. I hate coach ref histrionics, but they apparently work.

Brackets. Palm hasn't budged on Michigan as the #2 in the West with Arizona despite the carnage around them. Brad Evans of Yahoo has Michigan fifth overall, presumably matched with Villanova in the East. Lunardi has Michigan the #2 in the South opposite Florida. Crashing the Dance's algorithm has Michigan, Kansas, Syracuse, and Wichita State in a veritable dead heat for spots 4-7.

While it's unlikely Wichita is in any danger of dropping off the one line—algorithms are having slight issues with a 33-0 MVC team—it's anyone's guess how the twos get ordered. At this point it looks like Michigan is a lock to get one; hopefully they can play themselves out of the West. Indianapolis is obviously ideal for the regionals, and it does seem like Michigan can play themselves there by winning the BTT. Kansas and Virginia losses in their tournaments would help.

One thing that seems assured: Michigan will be in Milwaukee for the first weekend. Save Wisconsin, their competitors for that spot (Creighton, Iowa State, Cincinnati, MSU) are probably incapable of passing M on the S-curve.

Meanwhile, the Big Ten tournament sets up nicely for Michigan with Iowa, Michigan State, and Wisconsin on the other side of the bracket:

bracket_image1_thumb[1]

Indiana is clearly a bad matchup for M; everyone else they could meet before the final is manageable.

The most interesting bracketology debate, by the way, is Duke. Palm had them a 5 seed before their win over UNC, citing a near-total lack of accomplishments on the road. They're now a weak 4 on his bracket. Lunardi still has them a 2. Lunardi's got a rep for not being particularly good until late, when he talks to people close to the committee. If Duke does end up a fringe Sweet 16 seed, that is point Palm.

Congratsketball. Well done, Nebrasketball. By beating Wisconsin you've moved yourselves definitively off the bubble and finished a near-undefeated home season. And the only thing you lose this offseason is Ray Gallegos.

Comments

steve sharik

March 10th, 2014 at 1:39 PM ^

"DAGNABIT" works. Indiana got called for a bunch of travels in the second half after Beilein's tech. I hate coach ref histrionics, but they apparently work." 

I swear that, as genuinely angry as he seems, these outbursts are orchestrated.  Beilein's sat idly by being a respectful guy why these other jackass coaches (i.e., every other coach in the league and 99% around the country) are completely out of control and leverage that behavior into an advantage.  I think someone on the staff (or probably the entire staff) convinced JB to let it fly when you get hosed, which happens to every team, every game.  This is inevitable.  Refs are (pretty much) human, and humans fuck up.  A lot.

Thank you, refs of yesteryear for not only not throwing Bob Knight out of games in the first two minutes but actually reffing the rest of the 38 minutes decidedly in his favor.  One Coach K watched this for years and it wasn't hard for him (and others) to get an "a ha" moment.

It's like with trash talking.  Back in the day, and in HS, you didn't even have to swear.  Refs would warn you to quit talking to the opponent or it would be a T, unsportsmanlike, etc.  Teach these coaches and players to zip their lips or they can watch from the locker room, TV be damned. Coaches and players would adjust, quickly.  Certainly not quietly, b/c they'd bitch about it on talk radio and PTI, but certainly quickly.

Yeoman

March 10th, 2014 at 1:52 PM ^

Jay Bilas has been an eloquent voice of reason on the subject:

Either coaches are getting a competitive advantage with this stuff, or they aren't.

If they are, we should stop it because it's an unfair competitive advantage.

If they aren't, we should stop it because it's pointless and it looks bad.

ESNY

March 10th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^

There is some "boy who cried wolf" aspect to it.  Izzo, Crean, Ryan are going to bitch and moan about every call or non-call and I'm sure the refs get used to it.  When quiet Beilein blows a gasket, you must have to assume it was well deserved.

robpollard

March 10th, 2014 at 2:41 PM ^

Look at the top NCAA Div-1A winners of all-time: Coach K, Boeheim, Knight, Dean Smith, Rupp, Calhoun. All are/were famous for getting on refs. There's a reason for that: it works, especially when you are a respected coach, which Beilein certainly now is.

I don't want him to become Knight (or Izzo or Ryan, for that matter). Hopefully, Beilein will do it judiciously, as he seems to do now (e.g., I think flipping out after they missed two obvious travels, and might have missed that charge call, makes sense to me). But I would argue that, before this season, he didn't do it enough. Because again -- it works.

modabomb

March 10th, 2014 at 1:41 PM ^

"Let's just say I can't see a Beilein team not knowing that you should try to steal the ball and foul quickly in that situation"

I think at some point near the end of the Louisville game last year Michigan failed to do that, when Beilein lost track of how many fouls there were. Just sayin.

BursleysFinest

March 10th, 2014 at 1:56 PM ^

   I love the Nebraska/Tim Miles stories THIS year.  But is it wrong to start referring to Miles as Poindexter in preparation for when they're competing for the Big Ten title race next year and I start to hate them? I need a ruling.  

stopthewnba

March 10th, 2014 at 2:02 PM ^

On 2FG% and offensive efficiency are ridiculous.

 

I was shocked last night watching BTN's Basketball & Beyond last night, I was surprised to learn we gave Nebraska their only home loss.

UM went 5-0 @Minn, @Neb, @MSU, @Wisc, and @osu

Those 5 schools went 73-9 otherwise at home.

-----

Neb played MSU and Wisconly once (2-0) & MSU and WISC played each other only once

MICH's one-plays had a .377 leage winning pct. MSU's had .466, WISC .488

UM played the other top 7 teams at least 2x, save for ohio state, whom we played once (on the road)

Smash Lampjaw

March 10th, 2014 at 2:09 PM ^

According to Dan Dakich, who has ways to know, the adjustment Nik has made is to dribble lower. I scanned through the game pictures below for graphic evidence. One picture shows him dribbling low between two defenders, and one looks like the old high dribble. I will be interested to see if something so simple has really changed, and if it has really made the difference.

Everyone Murders

March 10th, 2014 at 2:13 PM ^

 Brian writes:

Michigan's Borg-like ability to adapt to phaser frequencies was also on display in this one.

 

and I think of:

And based on the 2013-14 basketball season, Michigan does seem Borg-like.  So I agree, even if that's not what Brian meant by "Borg-like". 

FrankMurphy

March 10th, 2014 at 2:46 PM ^

I pulled up the Arizona game recap earlier today. It's downright giggle-inducing to read it now, three months later. Sort of like the exact opposite of how you would feel if you read the recap of the Notre Dame game the day after the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl.

As a result, Michigan is staring down a rocky path to the tournament despite having what looks like three or four NBA first round picks on the roster. They've got a loss to Charlotte that's looking like it'll be filed as a bad one at season's end; their best win is against Florida State, which is probably a bubble outfit. The reliably brutal Big Ten is still Kenpom's #1 conference by a great distance. Wisconsin has not been left twitching in a ditch by the rule changes. Far from it, in fact.

Trey Burke was pretty good*, and not having him around is like trying to walk straight after years at sea. Michigan's stumbles are understandable. At this point they're threatening to take the team right off the pier and into the drink, though.

...Saturday's game against a wild-card Stanford outfit is enormous. A loss there and you're looking at the Big Ten much differently than you are now. You're trying to squint out a way that a 17-13 team can possibly make the tournament. As a backup. It probably won't come to that, but neither will it come to anything other than Michigan being the 7 seed you don't want to see.

I'm still cool with that after ten years during which Amadou Ba fighting the MSU student section was the most fun thing about the program, but I will confess a certain desire to see Michigan hack through opponent defenses like they are willows in front of the wrong house-sized woodchipper. It seems unlikely Michigan is going to assemble a pile of talent like this again for a long, long time, and watching it fumble a chance to be a Sweet 16 seed because they stick out their arm and Trey Burke is playing for the Utah Jazz** is painful.


Tee hee hee.

saveferris

March 10th, 2014 at 3:11 PM ^

It's comments like this...
Michigan's Borg-like ability to adapt to phaser frequencies was also on display in this one.
that make me love coming to this place.

greymarch

March 10th, 2014 at 3:21 PM ^

Brian is wrong when saying Michigan cannot get a #1 seed.  It's still possible for UM.  If UM defeats UW in the B1G game, and Villanova loses in the Big East tourney, that could push UM up to a #1 seed.  It's a long-shot, but it's out there for UM.

funkywolve

March 10th, 2014 at 5:53 PM ^

If Michigan gets to the BTT final, I'm guessing the committee is going to take a good look at whether they should be a one seed.

If UM is playing this Sunday, depending on what happens to some other teams, the committee might wait to see if Michigan wins the BTT before carving the #1 seeds in stone.

Michigan Arrogance

March 10th, 2014 at 3:45 PM ^

I recall reading a lot about the 1-3-1 when Beilein was hired and being intrigued- especially regarding the 1-3-1's ability to not just generate TOs, but to generate high percentage possessions off those TOs. The 1-3-1 has just ONE man at the baseline guarding the basket. 3 mid-way and the high man (Levert). Off a TO, that creates numbers on the fast break. The high man (Levert) needs to be a great fast break player and finisher at the rim (in addition to a long athletic quick defender obvs) b/c TOs off a 1-3-1 create fast break opportunities more so than a standard zone, or any other half court D for that matter.

It really is a great D if you have the personnel: Levert as the high man, long wings, and a quick PG who is willing to defend the baseline with reckless abandon. It seems to me, we've been slowly bring this out the last 2-3 weeks b/c the B10 was on the line and the team is gearing up for the post season. I bet they've been practicing that D a ton throughout the year (more than one would expect, given they haven't used it until recently) knowing it would be an "ace in the hole" so-to-speak when March rolls around.

3rdGenerationBlue

March 10th, 2014 at 3:56 PM ^

Brian - pretty sure you have stated in the past that you aren't a basketball expert so why do you have to ruin an otherwise decent post by whining about Michigan not trying a 2-3 zone? Oh, that's right, you can't help being a whiney douche. Do you really think you know it all?

Blue Durham

March 10th, 2014 at 4:11 PM ^

Michigan's performance is all the more remarkable given the games that Michigan "missed": Ohio State (10-8, 5th in Big Ten) Illinois (7-11, T8th) at Penn State (6-12, T10th) at Northwestern (6-12, T10th) That is very bottom-heavy. Given how the season played out, Michigan had to have played the toughest conference schedule. This is in contrast to UVa in the ACC, where they also easily won their conference but played one of the easiest conference schedules.

alum96

March 10th, 2014 at 4:58 PM ^

Yes the unbalanced schedule is going to cause havoc in the future, esp with 2 new teams joining the conf.  If this had been a close horse race we would have had a major disadvantage - we had to play the 2nd, 3rd and 4th place teams twice.  (6 games)  MSU only had 4, Wisconsin 4.  (MSU and Wiscy avoided each other and only played Neb once each)  By that measure Nebraska also lucked out in that they only played 4 games within the "Top 4".  And yes of course going into the year who knew avoiding Nebraska once would have been a good thing for MSU and Wiscy.

In future years with an even more unbalanced schedule this is going to bring up a lot of debates about who is really better than who...

The more ways you look at this season the more astonishing it is - toughest schedule in the conf, massive loss at center, and clear the field by 3 games.