no, YOU'RE off topic
Brian and I toured Michigan Stadium with assorted members of the media, and all we got was this
stupid t-shirt photo gallery:
Also, we got some details:
Nice, there are also some pictures on the Michigan Football facebook page.
Are they going to continue to use the old press box? Or is it just a shell?
I think they are going to use it this season then its getting taken out before the 2010 season.
Yes - I believe the plan is to tear it out in November after the OSU game.
or are they going to "update" (read: assify, a la the lions 2009) the lettering?
I'm pretty sure I read that they are going to save the "MICHIGAN STADIUM" from atop the press box.
They are moving the existing lettering to the east side tunnel entrance on the outside of the stadium. This is straight from assistant AD Mike Stevenson's reply to my email asking just that last year. No word if there will be new, assified lettering in its place though.
Halftime implosion, just like John L.
Looks sweet. Good perspective.
How long until you two get a press pass? I mean annarbor.com has less than half this traffic and they've got two.
How do you know how much traffic they're doing? If that's public we could take it to the SID.
Wait a sec, you dont have a press pass yet? Did they deny you one?
I swear I heard Madej, in an interview back in the spring when asked about blogger access, say he was up for it. In fact, I'm pretty sure he spoke directly about Brian and this blog and said a press pass is there for you if you wanted one. It was WTKA. Probably something linked from here.
Brian, I know you've articulated your reasons for not going the traditional press pass route. I respect that. But, your comment to FA leaves me thinking you pursued this and somehow got turned down.
That would suck. Especially in light of Madej's on-the-record comments from months ago.
You tell 'em. His e-mail can be found in the directory, but I would just like everyone to know, Madej has been incredibly helpful and still has my utmost respect. Any correspondence with the Athletic Department should reflect that.
I'm really surprised they haven't given a press pass to you guys yet. Back in 2006 I got one for the CMU game (the one that was delayed because of bad weather; good day to be in the press box), and I was beyond lucky. My blog was only around for 6 months or so, and I was only 16 at the time. Right on the credential it says you have to be 18, so I lucked out (especially since they checked my license). With the traffic mgoblog has and it's reach in general, I don't see why they would not give you one.
In 4 years 108,000 won't give us enough to have the biggest stadium in the country.
So we're going to go up to 110,000 and then back down to 108,000?
For all the seats we're going to lose, how much of a difference is the widening really going to make? I can see making the aisles bigger, but the seats are only supposed to be widened an inch or so. If you can't fit in them already, an inch isn't going to change much.
So there's no plans to make the benches slope downward, to encourage standing up?
There's 3 times when sitting is OK, and I'd like my seats to be flat when it is... plus, you have to stand on the benches, and sloping would make it awkward...
I hope we make sure to continue "saving a seat for Fritz Crisler" in the final capacity.
Actually, I'm pretty sure that the new capacity will sit at "...,002" instead of the original "...,001". One seat for Fritz and another for Bo.
It warms my heart, frankly.
AnnArbor.com posted video of the interior:
I've watched one game from the indoor club seating at Lane Stadium (which just finished their renovation in 2006, with some very similar layouts), and it was disappointing. The private restrooms and concession stand were nice, but the game-watching experience was odd. The glass wall seals out the sound of the game, and they pipe in either the stadium announcer or the TV broadcast. There's no crowd noise; the only thing you can hear are the other 200 people in the club seats, and most of them are muttering blue-hairs. There's no real cheering inside, just the occasional yell that sounds out of place, and some scattered polite applause.
I've been offered club seats several times for free since then, and turned them down.
Even if I could afford club seats, you wouldn't find me anywhere near them.
I want to roast in the early September sun, shiver in the late October breezes, and freeze my ass off in the late November snow/sleet/hail with everyone else.
Because at the end of the day, that is how football is meant to be enjoyed.
FWIW, I just read somewhere else that the windows can be opened. Don't know if it's true though.
This was mentioned on the tour, windows can be opened.
Even in the club seats? I read the UM premium seating brochure, and it really does look just like the set-up at Lane. The boxes have windows that open, but the club seats are behind a fixed glass wall.
Here's a slideshow of Lane just before it re-opened. This particular pic is a good one of the club seats.
It looks like there will be both.
This is a picture of where the club seats will go. There's no glass in front and doesn't look like there will be:
And this is from http://mgoblue.com/clubs/article.aspx?id=28536:
• Outdoor chairback or indoor theatre seats with abundant leg room and cup holders
What's funny, that nobody says, is that other than the nice chair, these would have been among the worst seats in the old stadium.
My old nosebleed seat in row 82 is better.
Since I completely agree, you receive a +1. I was in the skyboxes about a month ago and, for me at least, felt very cut off from the rest of the stadium. Even with the windows that open, it just isn't the same. I would take a ticket anywhere else in the stadium before one of the suites.
My best experiences in Michigan Stadium have been with crowd, whether it be MSU '04 or even Northwestern last november. College football is about sweating, freezing, cheering and swearing with 111,000 of your closest friends, and you would loose it all sitting in a seat that has a back.
Plus, the added height of these seats above the stadium floor makes it even less of an experience. I've been in several stadiums for away games and usually get stuck up in the rafters of the upper deck.
Our seats at the Big House are simply orgasmic in comparison.
The inside of the finished suite looks really nice.
Really nice pictures, it looks really good.
So the total number of seats will be greater, but for me and most everyone else without six digit salaries, there will really be less seats! On the other hand, the lux-boxes will move some of the blue hairs out of the bowl and open up their old seats. hummmm.... I wonder how that will pan out when it comes to ticket availability.
Most of the seats that will eventually be removed will be replaced where the old press box is now.
I think the "moving the blue hair" factor of the boxes is wildly overrated. Are long-time ticket-holding older alumni (whom I assume most are talking about when they bring this up) really going to plunk down $65k to $85k when they have acceptable seats already? The boxes are going to be primarily corporate patrons.
i love how most of the renovations are comming, i just don't want them to widen seats. why do they have to widen seats? 1/2 a freaking inch won't make a bit of difference, and the stadium loses 2,000 seats! plus i heard texas a&m might renovate their stadium to fit 110,00 in the next few years.
edit: kyle field may go up to 115,000! we can't be beat!