WH
Michigan Gets Served(!)
Filed under:
I'm not sure if this is news or not, but it kind of sounds newsy. Sort of.
[press release]
U-M Receives Notice of Inquiry from NCAA
ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman today (Monday, Oct. 26) announced that the University has received a "Notice of Inquiry" from the NCAA, indicating it will continue its investigation of allegations made about the U-M's intercollegiate athletics football program. The investigation is being conducted in cooperation with the University.
Statement from U-M President Mary Sue Coleman
"As I said at the onset of this review, we place the highest importance on the well-being of our student-athletes and the integrity of our program. We continue to work with the NCAA to ensure that a thorough and objective investigation occurs."
Statement from U-M Director of Athletics Bill Martin
"We continue to cooperate with the NCAA on this matter, which is why we reached out to both the Big Ten and the NCAA as soon as we heard the allegations. We remain committed to following both the letter and the intent of the NCAA rules."
[/press release]
I don't think this means anything other than "there is an investigation," but I could be wrong. I'm sort of on the radio (LINDA!) at the moment so can't research if this is serious or not.
October 26th, 2009 at 3:32 PM | 
Thanks for the shout out,
Thanks for the shout out,
October 26th, 2009 at 3:44 PM |
If we serve them back, will
If we serve them back, will
If we serve them back, will that mean that it's on?
Ann Arbor is a classy broad.
"Get off my plane!" - Ricky Stanzi, Air Force One 2
October 26th, 2009 at 4:06 PM |
I'd prefer to handle it Dance
I'd prefer to handle it Dance
I'd prefer to handle it Dance 360 style. Head-to-head dance battle.
October 26th, 2009 at 3:48 PM |
Points
Points
How do I get more? I should have more, right? I've been watching Michigan since the '60s and I saw Lloyd at Kroger once.
October 26th, 2009 at 4:38 PM |
Linda
Linda
You are my favorite Michigan fan evah! Teach me your tao.
October 26th, 2009 at 3:49 PM |
I am sure a certain
I am sure a certain
I am sure a certain Detroit-area newspaper will spare no ink when choosing the font size for its headline about this.
Candace: No... That why they make smart word box for tell monkey hard brain-hurty things.
Phineas: Removing prepositions makes it more condescending.
October 26th, 2009 at 7:04 PM |
Like an idiot, I strolled
Like an idiot, I strolled
Like an idiot, I strolled over to this particular Detroit-area newspaper for a look, and lo and behold, it was front-page reading material. They even included a link to the article that led to the whole situation in the first place.
My take - this reads like a standard notice letter sent by law firms during ongoing investigations. I work for a large university on the East coast and we get notices similar to this every couple of months. It basically states that there is enough evidence to continue investigating the matter - nothing more, nothing less. Since a front-page article in a major newspaper claimed violations occurred, it would be irresponsible for the NCAA to not look into the matter closely. My guess is that they will find some minor infractions but nothing more, and this whole incident will be nothing more than an afterthought in a couple of months.
October 26th, 2009 at 3:58 PM |
I CONFESS
IT WAS ME
I CONFESS
IT WAS ME
I CONFESS
IT WAS ME
October 26th, 2009 at 4:05 PM |
i know it was you, big
i know it was you, big
i know it was you, big boutros. you BROKE my heart.
"Real n*gg*z do real things." -Braylon Edwards
October 26th, 2009 at 4:09 PM |
But can he unbreak your
But can he unbreak your
But can he unbreak your heart?
Sportscenter.com raves: Sgt. Wolverine, "Michigan's biggest fan"!
October 26th, 2009 at 4:12 PM |
Alas
Alas
October 27th, 2009 at 8:02 AM |
Only Barwis can do that.
Only Barwis can do that.
Only Barwis can do that.
"...what do you say, is it the new Bluesmobile or what?"
"Fix the cigarette lighter."
October 26th, 2009 at 4:51 PM |
Big B: Hasn't Rich Rod taught
Big B: Hasn't Rich Rod taught
Big B: Hasn't Rich Rod taught you anything? It Was I! Stop those voluntary work out sessions and get back to class.
October 26th, 2009 at 5:24 PM |
paraphrasing
paraphrasing
but apparently the ncaa gets involved when there is "reasonble" expectations that something was afoul. I don't know much about it other than I'm slightly more worried than what I was 20 minutes ago
October 26th, 2009 at 6:12 PM |
I'm with you. the quote that
I'm with you. the quote that
I'm with you. the quote that i found was "The notice suggests that the NCAA has found reasonable cause to believe that violations may have occurred."
ugh.
October 26th, 2009 at 6:22 PM |
That's just because you're a
That's just because you're a
That's just because you're a stick in the mud who sees everything about Rodriguez in the worst light possible. The only people worrying over this are the people who want to.
October 26th, 2009 at 6:34 PM |
This was posted on Rivals
This was posted on Rivals
I drafted these in the past for the NCAA and it's nothing more than a formal letter that an "inquiry" is underway. If we receive a Notice of Allegations, that is when we should panic because it's akin to the federal government indicting you on federal criminal charges (you're basically already guilty and just need to worry about the sentencing). The Notice of Inquiry is like the NCAA making a telephone call saying "hey we heard the Free Press allegations and need some additional info" and then putting it in writing the next day and shipping it out.
http://michigan.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=338&mid=127407284&sid=883&tid... ($)
Note: This wasn't posted by me, so I don't have any answers to clarify any of this quote.
I put up a tough front, but deep down I just want to be held.
October 26th, 2009 at 6:33 PM |
Here's the direct response
Here's the direct response
Here's the direct response taken from the NCAA's FAQ section:
When reasonably reliable information has been obtained indicating that an intentional violation has occurred, that a significant competitive or recruiting advantage may have been gained, or that false or misleading information may have been reported to the institution or to the enforcement staff, the enforcement staff will undertake a review of the information in order to determine its credibility. At that time, the involved NCAA member institution is informed of the enforcement staff's inquiry by a notice of inquiry to the institution's chief executive officer (CEO). The review of this information generally entails the use of an enforcement representative (investigator) to conduct in-person interviews.
It says later on that it is the school's choice to release the notice, the NCAA itself will not.
And for anyone who wants to read the entire thing....
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/ncaa?key=/ncaa/NCAA/Legislation%20and%20Governan...
October 26th, 2009 at 8:05 PM |
Not an investigation
Not an investigation
It seems to me that this is no more than, 'hey show us your report when you're done self-investigating and we may want to ask you a few questions about it.' It's not an outside NCAA investigation
October 26th, 2009 at 7:34 PM |
NCAA power struggle?
NCAA power struggle?
From what I have read, this so-called "investigation" is being carried out during an NCAA power struggle for the next leader. One candidate is an internal candidate. The other is a UM grad. I really am just speculating about what this means. But I cannot help wondering if the internal candidate may have a vested interest in putting UM in an awkward position, since his main competition is from UM.
Otherwise, it's hard for me to imagine why the NCAA is not--to be fair--investigating all of the institutions that one might suspect of working their players beyond NCAA guidelines during the UM season being investigated: 2008. I mean, let's get serious! Does anyone really think that there were not some more successful programs that were demanding far more from their players during that season?
michelin
October 26th, 2009 at 8:22 PM |
I don't see light at the end
I don't see light at the end
I don't see light at the end of this tunnel.
October 26th, 2009 at 9:57 PM |
Fuck the Free Press
Fuck the Free Press
They incited this with their RR witch-hunt from day 1. I know they cant get past the days of sucking off Bo and Lloyd, but to attempt to seriously damage the program in this way is unforgiveable. It said in the article it says..."An NCAA survey in 2006 of 21,000 student athletes, the governing body's first attempt to measure time commitments, found football players in major programs estimated they spent 44.8 hours per week on athletic activities." That's more than twice the allotted 20 hours.
Does this excuse RR and his staff, perhaps not, but after 3-9, a little extra practice isn't exactly a overkill. Let's call it what it is...The pathetic, desperate for a story, Free Press looking to taint RR...so they go after the naive players (the young ones trying to show off how much they practice), and the disgruntled players (those who were too fat from the Carr years to handle Barwis and RR demands) and spun together a convenient character assassination to throw more dirt on RR. The whole thing makes me sick to my stomach.
I really hope the media parasites and inpatient fans don't push RR out of town before he can build the program we all want.
BILG
October 27th, 2009 at 1:12 AM |
Crap
Crap
Quite simply, this will not end well. Letters of inquiry are only made when credible evidence exists.
That said, if Michigan is punished for this, I want full scale investigations at every school in the country as far as whether they practice too much. Also, there had better be something more substantial than something a transfer said.
Finally, if the NCAA concludes that Michigan committed violations by having playing time be dependent on voluntary practice hours, then the NCAA infractions committee should lose whatever shreds of credibility it has left based on its ineffectiveness in policing top programs for substantial violations, rather than something that makes sense.
October 27th, 2009 at 7:34 AM |
How is this the case?
How is this the case?
How do you open a letter of inquiry (implying that you would like to ask questions), when you already have evidence?
Even if they do have evidence, it could just be the same as the Freep had (quotes from disgruntled ex-players).
It seems more like a formality to me.
... when I see some plays that Mike (Martin) makes in practice, I be like dang. - Jibreel Black
October 27th, 2009 at 10:28 AM |
Hope you're right...
Hope you're right...
...but at this point you are probably way too optimistic. There is way too much smoke for there to be no fire. We are past "is something bad going to happen?" and have arrived at "how bad is this going to be?"
It's Hucklebee deep and Davis close and Leach under center...
October 27th, 2009 at 10:55 AM |
A link for you
A link for you
As I doubt that you want to read through a long set of NCAA procedures (trust me, it's not fun), here's the gist of it, courtesy of ESPN:
October 27th, 2009 at 1:28 PM |
I agree. In fact, I just
I agree. In fact, I just
I agree. In fact, I just tried to make the same point in the Detroit News.
Maybe, while the US Congress is considering an investigation of the BCS, they should turn their attention to an investigation of the broader political and financial motivations and myopic investigative priorities of the NCAA.
...like what they started to do with major league baseball when the MLB commisioner would do little or nothing.
http://apps.detnews.com/apps/forums/sports/lettersindex.php?relatedURL=h...
michelin
October 27th, 2009 at 5:33 AM |
So the Free Press has yet to
So the Free Press has yet to
So the Free Press has yet to answer questions about their article's credibility? Why not?
October 27th, 2009 at 7:52 AM |
yawn.
yawn.
i think "newsy. sort of." is a PERFECT description.
October 27th, 2009 at 11:39 AM |
NCAA
NCAA
I can't believe they say they have credible evidence if they are going off the Free Press.
Thanks for the shout out, Bri!