Michigan 82, Minnesota 74 Comment Count

Ace

After cruising for most of the game, Michigan found themselves against the ropes, up only five in the final minute on the road with the momentum suddenly on the side of host Minnesota.

Derrick Walton had the ball poked away from behind and Carlos Morris looked to cut the lead further with a 2-on-1 the other way. Out of nowhere, Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman poked the ball out from behind, chased it down, and threw it off Nate Mason to retain possession. Walton iced the game at the line and the Wolverines escaped Minneapolis with a much-needed win.

Aside from that shaky moment late, Walton was masterful, scoring a career-high 26 points on 9/15 FG with eight rebounds, seven assists, and two steals. He had a hand in 15 of Michigan's 19 points over the final 5:50 of the first half, which culminated in a Rucker-caliber Walton crossover and three in the face of Joey King at the buzzer to give the Wolverines a 14-point lead.

Walton picked up where he left off early in the second half, and he started getting help from Abdur-Rahkman (16 points on a perfect 5-5 night from the field) and Duncan Robinson (14 points, 4/7 3P, career-high 8 rebounds). Michigan's lead reached as many as 19 points and stayed in double-digits until Nate Mason hit a one-handed runner while falling out of bounds with 5:46 to play.

Michigan found themselves unable to keep the Gophers guards out of the paint. Dupree McBrayer bulled his way to the hoop to earn two straight trips to the line. Walton tipped a potential defensive rebound back to Minnesota and Mason nailed a pull-up. A Robinson triple only temporarily stemmed the tide as McBrayer, Mason, and Morris answered with consecutive layups to cut the margin to two.

Then Rahk saved the day, first by putting his shoulder into Morris on a baseline drive for a tough and-one layup, then by cleaning up after Walton on Michigan's next possession. In the process, he may have saved the team's NCAA Tournament hopes.

Comments

kevin holt

February 10th, 2016 at 11:40 PM ^

It felt good to finally be better than a team after the past few weeks. I said that, and then suddenly seemed like we might blow it to the most Buttgersy non-Buttgers team in the conference

ijohnb

February 11th, 2016 at 9:50 AM ^

things could get weird if Michigan finishes higher in the conference and is on "the bubble" while the MSU discussion will be between a 3 and 4 seed.  When it will get really weird is if MSU loses to Indiana and Wisconsin and goes to 7-7 in the conference play having lost 6 or 10 of their last games.

I see this for Michigan:

Purdue - win

Maryland - loss

OSU - loss

NW - win (Caris returns)

Wisconsin - win

Iowa - loss

1-1 in BIG tourney

21-11, 10-8 in conference, 4 wins over Top 25 teams

9 seed NCAA tourney

 

In reply to by ijohnb

robpollard

February 11th, 2016 at 10:05 AM ^

...if Caris doesn't return until NW, which is well after he was "cleared to play" by UM's medical staff, there is a lot to be concerned about (both about him, and the team).

Plus, you got one stat wrong -- we'd have 11 wins if we beat Purdue, NW and Wisconsin. The only way I think we have a chance of getting to 11 is if Caris returns, starting with the very next game at Purdue (even if only to play 10-15 minutes at first).

ijohnb

February 11th, 2016 at 10:21 AM ^

One of non-conference wins was against a D2 team (don't you just love that!!), so to the committee, we are 17-7 right now. 

The reason I like us against Purdue is that this team is good for one or two games per year at home where we literally cannot miss.  Maryland was kind of that, but not really THAT.  I think we are due for one of those at home and my pick is that it will come this weekend.  Even if it was Minnesota, I think last night gave this team a huge confidence boost and it will carry over.

As for Caris, I think NW at home is a close to an auto-W that is left on our schedule.  I think that Caris is going to return, but I think it will 1) be at home, and 2) not in a pressure cooker.  I don't think he plays on Saturday because the team was in a good flow last night and he is going to be rusty.  I think he comes back at home against NW to shake off the rust and get back into form.

In reply to by ijohnb

blue90

February 11th, 2016 at 10:43 AM ^

is that big of a deal, everyone plays cupcakes in the begining of the year.  Some teams even play them in the middle of the year...Maryland just played Bowie State in the middle of the conference slate...

In reply to by ijohnb

MH20

February 11th, 2016 at 10:52 AM ^

Because non-D1 games don't drag down your RPI and strength of schedule.  I don't like it, either, but I assume that is the reason.  However, Michigan played a ton of RPI anchors in non-conference play so what's one more?

In reply to by ijohnb

robpollard

February 11th, 2016 at 12:47 PM ^

would be 10-8. We are 8-4 in the B1G right now; with 3 more wins in the conference (which is what you listed), we'd be 11-7. 

Has nothing to do with the DII school.

In reply to by ijohnb

funkywolve

February 11th, 2016 at 10:11 AM ^

Why would things be weird in the scenario that you mention?  MSU's resume is way better than UM's right now.  In Kenpom MSU is ranked #4 while UM is ranked 47th.  In RPI MSU is ranked 18th while UM is ranked 56th.  Against teams in the top 100 of the RPI, UM is 2-7 while MSU is 7-4.  

ijohnb

February 11th, 2016 at 10:20 AM ^

would be very weird if Michigan State finishes tied or below Michigan in the conference and is like a 5 seed and Michigan doesn't make the dance.  Ken Pom, RPI, blah - it would be weird and I think you would struggle to find precedent for such a scenario, yet it is very possible if you look at their remaining schedules.

In reply to by ijohnb

champswest

February 11th, 2016 at 10:33 AM ^

conference record than MSU. We will be lucky to finish 2-4 for a 10-8 record. Even if MSU loses to IU, and I don't think they will, they will be favored in all the remaining games. So, a 5-1 finish would put them at 12-6, 2 games ahead of us. If LeVert is back by Purdue, maybe it will change a game or two for us. I don't expect him to play like his former self until he has a couple of weeks of actual games behind him.

ijohnb

February 11th, 2016 at 10:54 AM ^

and play Indiana(who I think is actually just better than State), Wisconsin(already beat State), and then OSU on the road.  It gets lighter after that but that is not exactly a lightweight 3 game stretch.  State has also shown absolutely no ability to finish down the stretch in close game this season either, and all three of those games will be close.  They also host OSU in the return engagement on the last day of the regular season. 

MH20

February 11th, 2016 at 11:03 AM ^

Indiana is a much better team than Penn State but that didn't stop them from laying a massive egg in State College and Wisconsin has beaten no one of worth outside of Madison in conference play.  I hate to say it but I don't see MSU losing to either of thise teams at the Breslin Center.

In reply to by ijohnb

SpikeFan2016

February 11th, 2016 at 10:59 AM ^

I definitely disagree that we would win at Wisconsin but lose to Ohio State. 

 

Wisconsin is better than Ohio State, the Kohl Center is a louder environment and Ohio State is a better matchup for us because they have a terrible offense. 

In reply to by ijohnb

jmblue

February 11th, 2016 at 11:28 AM ^

If we finish ahead of MSU in the standings, I doubt we'll be considered a bubble team.  With eleven league wins, we're in for sure.  Ten most likely gets us in although it'd be a closer call.  

Todd92

February 11th, 2016 at 6:11 AM ^

Rough outing.  Not just shooting, either.  Hopefully a one of, like Caris at SMU.

 

BTN had a stat that we are winless against ranked opponents.  MD?

 

Fun to watch a player feeling it like D was in the 1st half.  The 3 at the 4:20 mark he turned to run back upcourt the instant the shot left his hand and never looked back at it.

Blue247

February 11th, 2016 at 7:56 AM ^

I thinks it disgusting that a player who has been cleared to play, but is clearly saving himself for the NBA draft! LaVert is not putting the team first!!

MGlobules

February 11th, 2016 at 11:36 AM ^

around his computer. He knew he was tougher than some old NBA-bound basketplayer, and he was gonna sacrifice one of his mgopoints to say it! He was going to call him a vagina! It was all so exhilerating that he felt like he needed a nap.

El Jeffe

February 11th, 2016 at 8:38 AM ^

Because this comment by user Blue247 will inevitably be caved and he will be given a swift banhammer, this particular brand of dumbfuckery will be lost in the mists of history. So allow me to preserve it for posterity (uh, unless my comment gets caved too...).

Here is "Blue247's" hopefully final contribution to the discourse: in a post entitled "LaVert's Vagina" (hey at least he spelled one of the two words right), Blue247 opines:

I thinks it disgusting that a player who has been cleared to play, but is clearly saving himself for the NBA draft! LaVert is not putting the team first!!

blue90

February 11th, 2016 at 8:55 AM ^

team I have ever watched in basketball.  Walton and Duncan played two of their best games of the year, that part is clear.  I love seeing Walton get his assist numbers up and that he did in this one and Duncan contributed in another area other than 3pt shots.  RAHK is great, though disappears many times.

If this team could play consistently and rebound, we'd be great.  I don't even care about defense, although that obviously needs to appear at some point.  Our bigs had two (!) rebounds between them, how does that even happen?  Also, Irvin is an overrated player.  I'm sorry but he is so inconsistent and didn't even contribute in other areas tonight.  If this team wants to take it to the next level, he needs to be playing the same during every game, in addition to Walton and Caris.  I'm not worried about Caris, and Walton's consistency has taken a big jump since the middle of the season.  Dawkins is garbage.

Also, lets talk March Madness!!!  Two questions.  Is the Big East good?  They never do anything in the tournament.  Also, is Maryland even that great?  I don't see them making it past the Elite Eight...They have only beat two ranked teams, both at home, and their schedule is easy.  I have OU, UNC, Iowa, and UVA in my Final Four right now.

Only this team can make every win feel like a loss, even after being up double digits the entire thing.  For some reason I watch every game and love them all, I should stop complaining.  Go Blue.  Beat Purdooo.

bronxblue

February 11th, 2016 at 9:11 AM ^

It was a solid win. This team needs someone like Lavert to help cover up these dry spells, but otherwise it was a good win against a team that desperately wants a win.

ak47

February 11th, 2016 at 9:16 AM ^

Mentally soft mediocre basketball team does mentally soft medoicre things.  This team is who they have been all year, even with lavert.  When the other team gets on a run we fold, luckily Minnsesota was terrible so we had a big enough lead but against every good team we have played we get run off the court and fold. Happened with Xavier and SMU and UCONN even with Lavert.

This team is one random win away over MD from being closer to the NIT bubble than the NCAA bubble.