Michigan 71, Detroit 62 Comment Count

Ace


Derrick Walton led M's late charge with great transition play. [Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog]

They should've known.

Detroit hung with Michigan for most of a rather ugly game, thanks to the hot hand of Juwan Howard Jr. (24 points) and the cold first-half shooting of Michigan. With just 5:38 to play, the upset watch remained in effect with the game tied at 52.

Then Detroit slapped the floor.

Michigan put the game away with an 11-0 run.

If you're confused about the correlation, ask a State fan.

The Wolverines couldn't buy a bucket in the first half, going 10/29 from the field, including an uncharacteristic 3/12 mark from beyond the arc. Neither team looked very good, nor did the officials, who couldn't decide whether to call the game tight or let everything go. The Titans scored on the half's final possession to take a 28-27 lead into the locker room.

The second half didn't begin so well, either, as Detroit extended their lead to four points during a rough stretch for Michigan freshman Kameron Chatman. John Beilein wasted little time going to what would be his best lineup of the night, lifting Chatman for Spike Albrecht and inserting Max Bielfeldt at center. Both provided the support Michigan's three backcourt stars needed; Albrecht dished out four assists, knocked down two threes, and added a steal, while Bielfeldt hauled in five boards and even dished out a couple assists himself.

That allowed the big three to flourish. After a rough first half, Caris LeVert went on a tear in the second stanza, scoring 17 of his team-high 21 points in the final 20 minutes; he also pulled down nine rebounds to nearly tally a double-double. Zak Irvin became the main beneficiary of Walton's fast break exploits, knocking down a couple second-half transition threes on his way to 18 points. Walton finished with 16 points of his own, grabbed three rebounds, and handed out three assists.

Outside of Howard, who needed 24 shot equivalents to score his 24 points, and an usually efficient Brandon Kearney (14 points on 5/6 FG), nobody on Detroit could get much going offensively; Michigan kept the Titans almost entirely off the offensive glass and forced most of their shots to originate from the perimeter, and eventually the Titans flat-lined, going through long stretches of the second half without being able to score.

Michigan managed to weather a bad shooting night to eventually come away with the win, but concerns are mounting as the three stars have been forced to bear what could be an impossible load to carry long-term. The Irvin/LeVert/Walton troika scored over 77% of the team's points tonight, and the freshmen expected to fill major roles either looked lost on the court (Chatman, DJ Wilson) or were disturbingly absent from the rotation as the game wore on (Mark Donnal, Ricky Doyle).

That's to be expected, in part, on such a young team with such obvious go-to players, but when the competition steps up significantly on Monday—when Michigan faces an Oregon team in Brooklyn that beat these same Titans by 18 earlier this week—the lack of secondary options is going to become a serious problem.

For now, Michigan's survived unscathed, and there are encouraging signs—one of those, somewhat surprisingly, on defense, where they've owned the boards. Sometime soon, though, this team is going to need one or two of their freshmen to grow up in a hurry.

Comments

umchicago

November 20th, 2014 at 10:42 PM ^

i didn't say dawkins was better skillwise.  i said he was more athletic.  and based on what i've seen (in all of 3 games), he's a better shooter.  chatman hasn't shown me anything to deserve 25 min per game while dawkins gets 5.  

i was just saying that against smaller teams like UD, i would like dawkins to get more minutes.

umumum

November 20th, 2014 at 11:43 PM ^

he does not have a reputation for being a better shooter--regardless of the small sample to date.   If he can't get in against UDM, what makes you think he'll get time against better opponents?  Odds are very long against him getting any meaningful playing time this year.

Blue In NC

November 21st, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

Disagree on Chatman.  His shooting has been poor but I have actually been impressed.  He is very quick and long, handles the ball very well and can be disruptive defensively.  Once he gets some confidence on his shot (stroke looks okay) and the game slows down a bit, I can see him being very good.  Hard to say when exactly that will happen.

ThirdVanGundy

November 20th, 2014 at 9:16 PM ^

Two out of those three MUST stup up or this team isn't going to be very good. Our guard play will be very good all year but boy, our frontcourt is in a mess right now. I think Chatman will eventually step up because you can tell he has the talent, but I can't really say the same about Doyle or Donnal. I wouldn't mind if Beilein made a run at one or two high profile bigs this year.

alum96

November 20th, 2014 at 9:18 PM ^

Still early but compared to Russell at OSU and Blackmon at Indiana (and GR3 in 2012 ), the Kam Chatman watch is not off to a good start.   Guy needs a breakout game to get some confidence.  Being across the country far away from friends can't be easy on him right now.

Worthing

November 20th, 2014 at 11:14 PM ^

espn:

2010- smotryzc 4*, hardaway jr. 4*, horford 2*, christian 2*

2011- brundidge 4*, burke 4*, bielfeldt 2*

2012- robinson 5*, mcgary 4*, stauskas 4*, levert 2*, albrecht 1*

2013- irvin 5*, walton 4*, donnal 4*, dakich 1*

2014- chatman 4*, doyle 3*, wilson 3*, dawkins 3*, rahkman 2*, hatch 1*

our recruiting is getting worse?

and damn, if that isn't one hell of a group of 1*s

93Grad

November 21st, 2014 at 11:03 AM ^

Look at 2014 compared to the previous 2 years and 2015 will have 1 unranked DIII transfer.  That is clearly a trend in the wrong direction.  2016 can change all of that and hopefully it will, but nothing is garuanteed.  Recruiting is a what have you done for me lately business. 

Gulo Gulo Luscus

November 21st, 2014 at 12:55 PM ^

How is "2014 compared to the previous 2 years... clearly a trend"?  I'm not a stathead but that pattern doesn't seem like enough data points to make a fair estimation.

We will likely never recruit at the level of Kentucky/UNC/Duke/Kansas year in/year out, but have had some classes that aren't far behind.  And it's all beside the point, THIS is the trend you should keep an eye on:

 

Michigan Wolverines (Big Ten Conference) (2007–present)
2007–08 Michigan 10–22 5–13 T–9th  
2008–09 Michigan 21–14 9–9 T–7th NCAA Second Round
2009–10 Michigan 15–17 7–11 T–7th  
2010–11 Michigan 21–14 9–9 T–4th NCAA Third Round
2011–12 Michigan 24–10 13–5 T–1st NCAA Second Round
2012–13 Michigan 31–8 12–6 T–4th NCAA Runner-up
2013–14 Michigan 28–9 15–3 1st NCAA Elite Eight
2014–15 Michigan 3–0 0–0  

 

JayMo4

November 20th, 2014 at 9:35 PM ^

Chatman needs a year before he'll be a good Big 10 player, IMO.  There are things he does well, but his decision making is inconsistent on either side of the floor, and he's not a good shooter or finisher.  I would hope that with some games under his belt, he'll at least develop to where he's not a liability this season.  But for now, in a close game we're almost forced to play Walton and Albrecht together because we're lacking that one more quality wing or stretch four to make this offense flow.

None of this means Chatman won't ultimately be very good.  He just doesn't strike me as instant impact.  He needs time, and it looks like that's going to be the case for this entire freshman class.

This team is probably as deep a team as Beilein has had.  But, unlike in the past couple seasons, the youth is probably going to catch up to us this time.

On the bright side, everyone but Bielfeldt is back next year.  

TheBoLineage--

November 20th, 2014 at 9:43 PM ^

The Mix--  is about finding Player-Combos and Player-Mins, etc etc, and The Inter-Active Dynamic Therein.

 

There are many Good Comments on this board for this game.  The Emerging Chatman Question, WHAT of Donnal, etc etc.

 

I myself have always been bothered by Blines reliance on 3-PtShots-PerimeterGame, with Little Deliberate Effort at Getting FT-pts.

 

The reason being The Old Axiom--  Live By The-3, Die by The-3.

 

The H-Det game might actually have been a Common Template Game for Bline--  junky Outside Shooting N Stuff for 1st-half Extended.  And then--  Oh, they hit a Series Of Critical 3-s late in game.

 

Win by 9-10 pts  . . . 

 

Hail-Storm

November 21st, 2014 at 9:07 AM ^

the benefit of the doubt here.  Sure he set the record for most efficient offense ever last year.  But this was after the team had the highest scoring offense the year before.  I mean only two BIG championships in the last 3 seasons (the year we didn't get it, with that loss to Indiana where the tip in just barely rolled out). On top of only a run to the finals and elite 8 the last 2 years.

I mean two games in, with a Freshman loaded team with only 3 upper classman cause he keeps getting players to play so well that they keep going to NBA early, I think we need a change at the top. And don't try to pull the whole "his teams have always improved immensly through the year as the young players grasp his system" argument.  I want 40 point blow outs now and my freshmen to play like seasoned veterans now, when it counts. Not at the end of the year. 

Who's with me?

readyourguard

November 20th, 2014 at 9:44 PM ^

Concerns are mounting? Really? It's game 3. I remember watching Walton out of the gate last year and thinking "man this kid is miles away". Eventually the game slowed down and he was a valuable point guard who improved considerably as the year progressed. In Beilein I trust wholeheartedly.

I Bleed Maize N Blue

November 20th, 2014 at 9:47 PM ^

Shiiit, Caris was just lullin' them to sleep in the first half.

 

After a rough first half, Caris LeVert went on a tear in the second stanza, scoring 17 of his team-high 21 points [O_O] in the final 20 minutes; he also pulled down nine rebounds to nearly tally a double-double.

 

But look out if he ever puts two good halves together.

lhglrkwg

November 20th, 2014 at 9:51 PM ^

Beilein's teams seem to start slow sometimes and pick up. Last year being a great example.

I suspect Beilein will find ways to cover for the weaknesses at the 4 and 5 and we'll still be a top 3 finisher in the Big Ten by seasons end

mexwolv

November 20th, 2014 at 9:58 PM ^

Blackmon is a beast.  Sucks we couldn't get him.

None of our freshmen are showing signs of improvement yet.  We will be heavily exposed in the next few games.  I'm moslty disappointed in Doyle and Donnal.  They seem pretty weak.  Chatman at least has shown he's got the raw talent and strength, just needs time.

On the bright side, the Big Three are really good and coming along nicely.

Hoping Beilein can get these kids rolling.

VCavman24

November 20th, 2014 at 10:10 PM ^

Holy shit guys I've been avoiding this blog for all of the pessimism about football but though at least we could get excited about basketball. But boy I was wrong. It's November 20th. Two games in and we're still undefeated with a coach who has raised banners three years in a row. Last year's team had a few struggles early on and this team might, but it's ridiculous how some of you seem to only be able to throw in the towel or complain about our recruits. And while I'm at it, you might just want to turn on CBS Sports and see that Bucknell (you know, that team we thoroughly beat a few days ago) is tied with #12 Villanova. So have a little confidence for once and be proud to be a Michigan Wolverine.

Needs

November 20th, 2014 at 10:55 PM ^

People on mgoblog have always been idiotically pessimistic about basketball. If you went through the game and postgame threads the last two years, you'd find innumerable posts about how Jordan Morgan couldn't play, how THJr didn't try, how Stauskas was one-dimensional, how Belein needed to throw the ball into the post, and how the team in general lacked heart..  

People just kind of overreact and act irrationally when they're fans.