Michigan 63, Indiana 47 Comment Count

Ace


NOT PICTURED: Indiana's defense (far left: Upchurch; center and right: Fuller)

Michigan comfortably defeated Indiana by 16 points, outgaining them by 161 yards and staying even in the critical turnover battle.

Or something like that, at least.

In real life, the Wolverines and Hoosiers traded haymakers, smashing records while combining for 1,323 yards of total offense. I'll spell that out: ONE-THOUSAND, THREE-HUNDRED AND TWENTY-THREE YARDS OF TOTAL OFFENSE. 751 (SEVEN-HUNDRED--okay, you get it) of those belonged to Michigan, a school record. Devin Gardner passed for 503 of those yards, another school record, and added 81 yards and three touchdowns on the ground, breaking Denard Robinson's U-M record for single-game total offense. Jeremy Gallon caught 14 passes for 369 yards and two scores, felling not only the Michigan receiving yards record, but also the Big Ten mark.

On the other side of the ledger, Indiana amassed 572 yards and 28 first downs while scoring on seven of their first 11 full drives. We all know this feel, probably-drunk student (via bubbaprog):

When the above occurred during the game doesn't matter, because it could've been any moment of the game.*

Remarkably, the teams traded punts to begin the game; matters escalated quickly. First, Indiana QB Nate Sudfeld hit a wide-open Cody Latimer for a 59-yard touchdown when Michigan's defense couldn't get set against the lightning-fast Hoosier attack; Raymon Taylor got beat over the top, and the safety help it appeared he expected never arrived.

Michigan responded with a five-play, 56-yard march capped by a 13-yard Gardner scoring run; all but one of the plays was a shotgun run. Clearly, Al Borges wasn't pleased with last week's effort; not only did Michigan come out with two new starting guards, Erik Magnuson and Joey Burzynski, they spread the field to make attacking a porous Indiana defense that much easier.

From there, it was the Jeremy Gallon Show. The Wolverines took a 14-7 lead after a 70-yard Gallon catch set up a two-yard TD run by Fitz Toussaint. By the end of the first quarter, he had 116 yards. Back-to-back first down passes to Gallon set up the next score, too, a seven-yard Toussaint run to the pylon for a 21-7 Michigan lead.

Indiana responded to that score in their trademark lightning-strike fashion, taking just 1:03 off the clock as Tre Roberson took over for Sudfeld, going 3/3 on the drive for 57 yards. That took some luck, as Roberson's second throw went right through the hands of Raymon Taylor, only to be caught by Duwyce Wilson; one play later, Shane Wynn took the top off the defense for a 33-yard score.

The Wolverines looked to carry all the momentum into halftime, going on a methodical 12-play, 91-yard drive that ate 5:19 of the final 5:59 off the clock; a 21-yard touchdown pass to—who else?—Gallon on a wide open flag route. As it turned out, however, 40 seconds was just enough for the Hoosiers to move into field goal range with a little help from a very passive defense, and Mitch Ewald drilled a 50-yarder to make it 28-17 at the half.


Upchurch

Michigan received to start the second half; any hopes of opening up a comfortable lead were quickly dashed, however, when Toussaint dropped a pitch from Gardner and IU LB Flo Hardin returned it 13 yards to the Wolverine five. Three plays later, Tevin Coleman dashed through a huge hole in the middle to bring the Hoosiers within four.

Even as the Wolverines tried to slow the game's breakneck pace, Indiana wouldn't allow them to do so; unfortunately for the Hoosiers, they did this by ceding a 50-yard touchdown pass to Gallon on the fourth play of the next drive. The play came on another very successful adjustment by Borges: bringing in two tight ends, going max protect, and letting Gallon and Devin Funchess work against Indiana's generous secondary. Funchess drew a lot of attention from Indiana's back seven, allowing Gallon to roam freely downfield, almost as if he were invisible.

Indiana came back with a five-yard Roberson pass to an uncovered Wynn on a broken coverage, failed to convert a reverse pass on a gutsy (read: questionable) two-point conversion attempt, and after a Michigan punt another Ewald field goal cut the lead to just one point. The offense once again answered the bell, however, this time in the form of Gardner pump-faking and scrambling through several Hoosiers en route to a six-yard score, eating an illegal late hit after he arrived in the end zone.

Despite kicking off from the 50 with a nine-point lead and a defense seemingly incapable of slowing down Indiana, Brady Hoke elected to have Matt Wile boot the ball through the end zone instead of trying a relatively safe onside kick. The Hoosiers made up the 15-yard difference in one Tevin Coleman rush, then cut the lead to two on a 15-yard Roberson scramble.

Hearts quickly jumped into throats and stomachs plummeted into shoes after Michigan moved their way down to the Indiana two-yard line, only for Gardner to fumble the snap on first-and-goal; Indiana recovered and the Big House fell silent as the Hoosiers took the ball with a chance at the lead. Michigan caught two big breaks, however: first, Roberson dislocated his thumb, forcing Sudfeld back onto the field; second, Sudfeld softly tossed the ball in the direction of an open receiver, only for Thomas Gordon (above, Fuller) to undercut it for a critical interception, giving the Wolverines the ball back just three yards worse for wear.

After two runs were stuffed by the Hoosiers, Gardner dropped back to pass, niftily eluded a corner blitz, and took off up the middle, barrel-rolling over a tackle attempt and into the end zone to make it 56-47. Roberson gamely got Indiana into scoring position again on the next drive, but Hoosier hopes were dashed when either a bad overthrow or a miscommunication with the intended receiver resulted in a ball deflecting off Jourdan Lewis's hands and straight to Gordon for his second pick. Toussaint, who finished with 151 yards and four touchdowns on 32 carries, capped the scoring with a 27-yard dash up the middle.

This felt a lot like the 2010 Illinois game, with Michigan looking unstoppable on offense and incapable on defense. The difference, of course, is that the offense was supposed to be the big question mark with the defense being called upon to keep the team afloat. For this game's good signs—the offensive explosion and adjustments from Borges—there were plenty of bad ones, especially the defense allowing five different Indiana receivers to record catches of at least 20 yards. One thing is for sure: this team still looks eminantly beatable, and after this week's bye, the Wolverines face the teeth of their schedule, starting with a trip to East Lansing to face the vaunted Spartan defense (and also, thankfully, a Connor Cook-led MSU offense).

----------------
*If you must know, it was after Gardner's fumble on the goal line, which stood out as particularly absurd even in this absurdity of a game.

Comments

The Peanut Master

October 19th, 2013 at 9:49 PM ^

Student section was around 5/7th to 6/7th full at kickoff and almost 100% full throughout the entire second and third quarters. It did admittedly thin at the very end of the game, but it only got to 1/4 full with maybe under a minute to go when the game was decided. I don't know if you were at the game or watching or TV or whatever, but wherever you were you clearly didn't have a good vantage point of the student section, or you have some vendetta that is making your eyes deceive you. I hate GA as well, but quite frankly, I was pretty impressed with the student turnout given the cold weather and rainy conditions.

The Peanut Master

October 19th, 2013 at 10:59 PM ^

The upper-most section above the student section was fairly empty, but you might be confusing that as part of the student section, which as of this year it no longer is. The actual student section was pretty damn full, and the people who work there were still doing the idiotic rope-students-as-far-down-as-possible-like-we're-sheep thing that makes the student section look emptier because everyone is more squeezed together.

Vote_Crisler_1937

October 20th, 2013 at 10:36 AM ^

There were a few more completely empty rows in the student section at half-time. No question a small chunk of students left at half-time. These seats were down below the entrances absolutely in the student section. It was much more than a quarter full as some have said but the third quarter had fewer than the 2nd quarter.

Ben Mathis-Lilley

October 19th, 2013 at 9:28 PM ^

But I thought this game was relatively heartening. Offense played like a real offense and the D was going up against the ninth-best offense in the country per one of Football Outsiders' metrics. Obviously 500 yards isn't great, but a lot of those were just really nice plays by Indiana, and we had two INTs go through DBs' hands. In the big picture, the safeties got beaten up on, but that's an area where I feel like we know we have capable players and coaches, so you can expect improvement — it's almost good to see some of these problems exposed before playing against Northwestern and Ohio.

In other words, I feel like Mattison's D has earned the right to have an off game every now and then against a quality opponent w/o inducing panic. As opposed to, like, the offensive line being unable to block against UConn.

UMaD

October 19th, 2013 at 10:25 PM ^

I found this game encouraging as well.  It seems like most of the fanbase negativity comes from unreasonable expectations about what a team with a bad OL can do. Those should have been dispelled weeks ago.

I don't know that the offenses performance against Indiana's D means much for the rest of the year but it was encouraging nonetheless.  We saw a coherent game plan and a desire to score from Borges.  That was good, though Borges may continue to be inconsistent for the rest of the season. 

We saw Funchess and Gallon look like studs, we saw some good strong running from Fitz, we saw an epic performance from Devin (and no INTs!)  This was a great game for our offense, other than the Dileo injury...  Glimmer of hope for the OL to be competant when not asked to be something they are not.

The D performance was discouraging a bit - but as you said, Indiana is a pretty good offensive team.  No other team we face will pass the way they do.  Still, some good lessons learned, we can hope.  Stribling and Gedeon got some good experience.

yoyo

October 19th, 2013 at 11:24 PM ^

I would've liked to see the defense put a deep safety since IU seemed to go for the endzone on every play. 

Also, the offense looked much better, especially the running game.  However, Borges does seem to go Jekyll and Hyde and calls some great games and some terrible ones.  Hopefully something sticks this time.

Maizenblueball

October 19th, 2013 at 9:30 PM ^

Thank you for including that GIF.  When I was watching the game live, I started LOL when I saw her, and I had to rewind my DVR a few times.  I even thought to myself, I sure hope somebody makes this a GIF.  Sure enough, the internet has delivered.

DonAZ

October 19th, 2013 at 9:41 PM ^

I am prepared to be proven wrong about this ... but I have a more positive sense coming out of this game.

Yes, the defense gave up a lot of plays, yards and points.  But the young players got a lot of game-time reps and they saw a lot of real-life things that should remain in their minds going forward.  I can't help but think if the Michigan defensive line had been able to get more pressure from the front-four this would have been an entirely different game.

My sense is the offensive line is much improved.  The UFRs will tell the story.  Even if Indiana's defense is not great,  if the UFR shows Michigan executing properly across the O-line then that's a positive that we can hope carries into MSU.

I also wonder if the PSU debacle finally woke Hoke up to go back to what seems to work for this offense -- more of a spread look, with Gardner in shotgun.  Manball may be the dream, but the reality is spread and the future is now.  If that's what happened, then great.

Is Michigan ready to beat the top teams?  Hardly.  But will we look back on 2013 and see this Indiana game as an inflection point with the trend line going up from here?  I think so.  That's my sense.

Vasav

October 19th, 2013 at 10:14 PM ^

I don't like these types of football games. I like every TD to feel special, like a massive achievement. Games without defense are not as much fun to me. /rant

Reader71

October 19th, 2013 at 10:51 PM ^

RPS -3. Bad playcall Ace. The offense was not supposed to be a question anywhere but here. Before this game, we had the 21st ranked scoring offense in the country at 39 PPG. No one with an adult-level control of their emotions and ego thought our offense would struggle against Indiana.

I Have A Gnarly Face

October 19th, 2013 at 11:49 PM ^

That is one of the best gifs I have ever seen. Once I saw that on TV, I knew it would be used to  make poeple laugh.