Michigan 61, Purdue 56 Comment Count

Ace


Eric Upchurch/MGoBlog

Derrick Walton had taken nine shots. None of them had gone in. With Michigan improbably within three points in the waning minutes against Purdue, however, he crossed over PJ Thompson and charged into the paint, laying his first bucket in off the glass as AJ Hammons knocked him to the floor.

While Walton missed his chance to tie the game at the line, he more than redeemed himself, pulling down two signature high-flying defensive rebounds and making 4/4 free throws in the final 15 seconds to seal the victory.

On the afternoon Caris LeVert finally returned to the court, only to play 11 scoreless first-half minutes before sitting out the second half, Zak Irvin also played out a redemption tale. Coming off an ugly 1/8 performance against Minnesota, Irvin went 2/7 in the first half and had his first shot of the second swatted by Hammons. Then he heated up from the outside and turned around his battle with burly Purdue forward Caleb Swanigan, scoring 16 of his 22 points in the second half, including the winning points on a pull-up from the free-throw line with 1:09 remaining that barely crested over Hammons' fingertips.

Despite inconsistent performances from their stars, foul trouble for Mark Donnal, and Rapheal Davis once again eliminating Duncan Robinson (4 points, 0/1 3P) from the offense, Michigan found a way to win. To earn it, they had to lean on defense and rebounding.

No, really.

Against the best rebounding team in the conference on both ends of the floor, Michigan won the battle of the boards, pulling down 28% of their misses to Purdue's 20%. While Swanigan (14 points, 6/9 FG) proved tough to handle, the bigs collectively slowed the two-headed center monster of Hammons and Isaac Haas (combined 21 points on 24 shots) with help from timely double-teams by the guards.

That's how Michigan could go 5/20 from three and still beat a team that presents major matchup issues. Purdue went 6/12 from beyond the arc but only 15/41 within it, and the second chances they normally rely upon weren't available very often. Days removed from one of the most demoralizing weeks in recent memory, Michigan is 9-4 in the Big Ten, all alone in fourth place and needing only two wins in their final five games—which includes a home matchup against Northwestern—to feel very good about their NCAA Tournament chances.

Perhaps—just perhaps—we were too quick to bury a John Beilein team. It wouldn't be the first time.

Comments

buddhafrog

February 13th, 2016 at 4:42 PM ^

We outrebounded the Ents 39-35 purely because Dakich told us this team would fight and claw and give maximum effort. Ugly, but beautiful win. Probably a huge win for us going forward.

Bang Bang Go Blue!

blue90

February 13th, 2016 at 4:49 PM ^

What is defense?  Is this world ending?  The Michigan basketball team just played defense. What a team effort.  Rebounds, passing, everything.  The point distribution was not pretty but other than that, that win would have just gotten us in the tourney.

I still will preach consistnecy as something we are lacking and have been all season but I guess that is what it is.  Walton and Irvin cannot play well together for some odd reason.  They can't both have a good night at the same time but oh well.   The only thing holding this team back is players scoring consistently and defense.  If Caris comes back then hell yes. Go Blue.

TrueBlue2003

February 14th, 2016 at 1:16 AM ^

against all the bad teams during the 4 game winning streak.  Walton has just been brutal against most of the good teams this year.  Good thing the defense showed up today to make up for it.  

And yes, the defense holds this team back, but it's 50% of the game, so um, for that to be ONE of the "only" problems is a huge problem.  A big part of it is focus and effort, and it sounded like they made a concerted effort this week to give the effort and it looked like it on the court.  Sad that home games against rivals didn't do it last week, but hopefully they can keep it up.

WolvinLA2

February 14th, 2016 at 9:39 AM ^

Caris playing 11 minutes is huge (especially considering we got the win anyway). If he can log 11 minutes now, he should be able to do at least double that within a week, which will be a huge help, and should be his 30+ minute self within 2 weeks. That sets him up really well for the BTT and the big dance where hopefully he'll be full go.

bronxblue

February 13th, 2016 at 4:49 PM ^

Just a great win. Basketball is like football on steroids in how the emotions can flip between games, but this team always felt like one of those heart attack seasons waiting to happen. That said, if they can play even competent defense they can beat anyone, and in a tourney their shooting could absolutely take them to the second weekend.

schreibee

February 13th, 2016 at 5:38 PM ^

Boy, I find it difficult to believe that you saw the only thing separating M from Hoosier or sparty was defensive effort! I mean, that was a great W today, and I salute the hard work on D & rebounding - keep it up guys! But we were more than just a "wee bit" short of winning those games last week? Or SMU or Xavier back when we still had a healthy Caris... This team needs the past couple recruiting classes to do a 180 and start providing major contributions. Rahk excepted, probably the lowest profile recruit of the Beilein era...

schreibee

February 13th, 2016 at 5:55 PM ^

Well the problem I was pointing out is you're calling our past 2 recruiting classes (again, excepting Rahk) lower tier, minor players. Compare to Soph Burke, Frosh McGary, Frosh Stauskas, Spike, Caris - even Frosh Irvin & Walton when they were able be "minor contributors"... We NEED entire recruiting classes to not be relegated to "minor, lower tier" contributions. Excepting Rahk...

bronxblue

February 13th, 2016 at 11:06 PM ^

Who said anything about the last couple of games?  They got their asses handed to them, but at the same time both IU and MSU shot incredibly well, and only some of that can be attributed to bad defense.

In general, this is an offense that should be able to score in bunches, and so if they can keep the other team even a bit down they can beat anyone.  And in the tourney, teams typically have less time to scout possible opponents and are not as familiar with them compared to year-over-year conference foes.  So while I don't think UM is a given to get out of the first weekend, a team that can shoot like they have been able to and can play even semi-competent defense can beat almost anyone.  Is it unlikely?  Sure.  But I wouldn't be surprised if this team had one of those random Elite-8 runs where they shoot the lights out for a weekend.

The recruiting has been a bit down, but it's also a bit unfair to judge the class thus far.  Donnal has improved this year and could be a very solid big as an upperclassman.  Robinson is a transfer but is still a relatively young player who can be expected to be a contributor for 2 more years.  Dawkins has the tools, so maybe he makes a leap if the notion of defense is hammered into him for an offseason.  Chatman and Doyle are the disappointments, but Doyle has shown some flashes and, well, sometimes kids just don't work out on the court like you expect.  Simpson and Teske should be solid additions, and both Watson and Davis might be projects but have some upside.

Beilein is never going to consistently get top-50 recruits; it's just not who he goes after and, for lack of a better phrase, isn't the type of guy to get that dirty.  But this team has been about as good as I expected (I always felt a 4 seed was unlikely given the lack of an inside presence on both ends of the court), and fans expecting consistent F4-type runs were always going to be disappointed.

Stringer Bell

February 13th, 2016 at 6:11 PM ^

It is, it's also possible to do so without overstating its significance.  This is a big win and especially big for our tourney chances.  But it doesn't disprove that Beilein peaked, it doesn't disprove that this team just isn't consistent enough to make a deep tournament run, and it doesn't disprove that this program is not in the position we thought we'd currently be in 2-3 years ago.  So this win should be enjoyed.  The players worked hard and their effort deserves to be commended.  But we don't have to go overboard with the ramifications of this win.

Franz Schubert

February 13th, 2016 at 4:58 PM ^

May get a much higher seed than many expect or project. All 7 losses are against Kenpom top 25 teams and now have 3 top 25 wins. That's impressive any way you slice it.