MGoHall of Fame: Basketball Nominees Comment Count

Brian

See also: what this is, hockey nominees.

Zack Novak

2009-0104-ad-umbball237[1]medium_321novak[1]

PROS: If he was a Football Manager player, would have an influence and work rate of 20. This means he's a gritty grittenstein who everyone loves because he defies his physical limitations to be pretty good. Had an Aneurysm of Leadership to lead Michigan to its first victory in Breslin since 1997.

Also nailed six threes in that game. Iconically bled all over himself in a game against Illinois during Michigan's first tourney push since the program's NCAA immolation. Kind of a walking capital-L Leadership avatar. The kind of player opposing fans loathe. Our Brian Cardinal. Swears like a sailor and has problems keeping his emotions in check.

Can dunk!

CONS: Was never a star. Senior year usage was 14.3%, in the "role player" arena. Repeatedly posterized by men a half-foot taller than him, though this could be filed under a positive from a grit perspective. Clocked an OSU player late in a loss to get booted.

Darius Morris

PROS: Amazing sophomore year saw him finish top five in assist rate nationally and shoot efficiently despite an astronomic usage rate. Told Kalin Lucas to get off his #$&*ing court, and Lucas had to since Michigan had just swept Michigan State for the first time since paper was invented. Was the engine of Michigan's second tourney birth since the NCAA immolation, this one not a skin-of-your-teeth bubble nailbiter. Nearly led Michigan to an upset of Duke in the secound round. If only that floater had dropped…

CONS: Made a poor decision to enter the draft early, limiting his impact to that one year—his freshman year was not exactly Trey Burke's. Draft entry decision seemingly taken in full knowledge that he was unlikely to go in first round. That's tough to take, and it seems like a one-year phenom has to be more phenomenal to get in here.

Also while it's not his fault that Tim Doyle called him "butterfly," it is a regrettably true thing.

Manny Harris

PROS: Best player on Michigan's tourney-drought-breaking team, with massive usage (32%, top 25 nationally), a nearly-as-massive assist rate, and okay shooting. Major factor in the win at Minnesota that essentially got Michigan into the tourney.

A guy who signed up with Michigan when he had other options and there wasn't much reason to be a Wolverine. Stuck with it despite the Amaker firing. Way less crazy than Alex Legion. Actual full name is "Corperryale L'Adorable Harris," which… wow. Key guy in Michigan's perception-altering wins over UCLA and Duke in 2009.

CONS: Also made a debatable-at-best decision to enter the draft early and has spent his NBA career on the fringes of the Cavs' roster. Had blowups with Beilein that caused him to sit during critical periods. Tended toward lazy habits like jacking up contested threes. Had a little Rasheed Wallace disease while at M wherein he seems like less than he should be. Michigan disappointed greatly in his final year despite losing only a couple of walk-ons and Kelvin Grady.

Daniel Horton

NITMICHIGAN_t440[1]images[1]

PROS: Yeah, he's eligible. If this is a surprise it just goes to show how long ago 2006 seems in basketball terms.

Horton's teams never made the tournament but in his last go-round he was the main man on an outfit Kenpom likes better (#31) than a couple of Beilein outfits that got in. And he was fantastic: 28% usage the #35 assist rate, a bunch of steals, 90% free throw shooting, 49% from two, and 39% from three. That team would have made the tourney if they a) hadn't gone from 16-3 to 18-10 to end the year and b) hadn't blown it against Minnesota in the Big Ten tournament.

I think we all forget how good Horton was because his teams never got anywhere.

CONS: Teams never got anywhere. He's holding the NIT MVP trophy above, a career-summing photo if there ever was one. While this isn't his fault it is a downer. Got suspended for most of his junior year thanks to a domestic violence thing he pled guilty to.

DeShawn Sims

Michigan's DeShawn Sims holds up a framed game jersey as he and fellow seniors Zack Gibson and Anthony Wright were recognized before their final game at Crisler Arena. The seniors went out winners with a 83-55 trouncing of Minnesota, Tuesday night March 2nd. 
Lon Horwedel | AnnArbor.com95581892_display_image[1]

This was difficult to separate out since there are a number of candidates with things to recommend them: Brent Petway, Graham Brown, and Stuart Douglass were tough to leave out, but they all seemed like junior versions of Novak in the grit category.

PROS: The other top banana on Michigan's drought-breaker. A skilled power forward forced to play out of position at center too much, Sims was a wildly inconsistent player capable of dropping 20 on 8 shots one night and 2 on 8 the next night. These swings correlated very well with the height of his opponent. Are you a below-the-rim 6'8" kid at Northwestern? Forget it. Are you a shotblocker? Enjoy your feast.

Sims came back from an unimaginable personal tragedy—his brother was shot to death—endured during his freshman year to be a mainstay for his final three years. He was high-usage, a quality rebounder, and rarely turned the ball over. These things made up for some eh shooting percentages to make him an efficient player. Another guy who had options but decided to go with Michigan at a time where there was little reason to.

CONS: Has the same knock Manny Harris did since his final year was the disappointing follow-up to the tourney appearance. Was never a really great player and doesn't bring Novak-level fan intangibles (FANTANGIBLES!) with him.

Comments

snarling wolverine

May 14th, 2012 at 7:38 PM ^

Horton had a very good senior year, but the other three years he had an awful shooting percentage and almost 1:1 assist/turnover ratio.  Guys like Big Ten Wonk (I think) would always call him overrated.  But he did have an excellent senior year.  Is that enough?  I don't know.

PeteM

May 14th, 2012 at 10:43 PM ^

I love all the players on this list, but will go with Horton first.  He single-handedly beat Bo Ryan (down by 14 with 5 min to go) as a freshman.  In most years, his freshman (but for sanctions) and senior teams would have gone to the tournament.   At one point he made something like 45 straight free throws.

I'm not an Amaker-hater, but wonder what he could have done with Beilein. I think as a shooter he would have fit Beilein's system, but I also think under Beilein he would have been helped to become more of a passer etc.

jmblue

May 15th, 2012 at 12:56 PM ^

I know Horton hit the game-winning shot to beat Wisconsin that year, but didn't LaVell Blanchard hit a bunch of threes before that?  I wouldn't exactly say he won it single-handedly.

JohnnyV123

May 15th, 2012 at 12:04 AM ^

I didn't like in Brian's original post on the MGoHall of Fame he said...

"Like… this should be a thing Zack Novak gets in, no questions asked"

....only because it biases people a bit. I think there is a fairly strong argument for Novak based on leadership and staying for 4 years but because of talent and numbers (like that usage percentage) I don't think he is a shoo in.

The kind of hall of fame guys I think are truly worthy are ones who not only play extremely well but represent the school well, show leadership, and bonus points for things like overcoming people not believing in you. Mike Hart and Shawn Hunwick (both knocked for being short for their position yet Hunwick had great numbers and Hart is our all time leading rusher) are guys that are shoo ins while someone like Braylon Edwards should not get in despite his excellence on the field in a Michigan uniform.

I think I vote no on all these entries. Daniel Horton to me is the closest but the domestic violence charge for me rules him out. Morris is out for going to the draft too early imo, Harris out for being a bad team player, and Sims I don't think has the it factor as a player.

rederik

May 15th, 2012 at 6:51 AM ^

Has to be Novak, for reasons already discussed above.

I was at U-M during these years (05-09), so despite the drought I like the others as well--with the exception of Darrius Morris. He left early and for as much as I can't hold it against him for wanting to join the NBA... I'm holding it against him for wanting to join the NBA. Hindsight's 20/20 but it's all we have and he was a low second rounder... he should have stayed. The fact that he didn't should be a strike against him (as it's noted in his Cons section) in the MgoHall analysis.