Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 4 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 3 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,355 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 237 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 8 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    32 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    104 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    1 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    58 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    18 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    17 replies
  • Coach B w Andy Katz podcast
    3 replies
  • Michigan Alumni Club Scholarship Golf Tournament featuring Honorary Chair Glen Rice - This Saturday in Miami!
    5 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    114 replies
  • OT: UCL Semi-final First Legs
    14 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    61 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    79 replies
  • New Jersey DE Aeneas DiCosmo: Prospect we should all want at UM
    55 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    28 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: UCL Semi-final First Legs
    14 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    78 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    12 replies
  • LaMarr Woodley Opening K-8 School in Saginaw
    43 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    83 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    59 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    67 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    129 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    14 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    19 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    16 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  • SIAP: Jay Feely prom "controversy"
    36 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    83 replies
  • It’s Friday - Time to POSBANG!!
    81 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    81 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    81 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    79 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    78 replies
  • OT: Sparty considering bringing back Reschke...
    74 replies
  • OT: Avicii dead at 28
    73 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    67 replies
  • Apparently, the NCAA has already received a response from MSU about Nassar
    64 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    61 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    61 replies
  • Auston Robertson arrested again
    59 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    59 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Mailbag: Tourney Prospects, OL Flipping, MANBALL Re-evaluating

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — March 6th, 2012 at 1:24 PM — 70 comments
Filed under:
  • basketball
  • brady hoke charms pants
  • brady hoke points at things
  • kenpom
  • MANBALL
  • ncaa tournament
  • offensive line
  • posts in which i say HOWEVA
  • shane morris

Basketball: really as good as all that?

Via UMHoops

Now, it doesn't matter for the Big Ten regular season...it is what it is, we went 13-5, and earned a share of the title.  But what does it mean for the Big Ten Tournament and the NCAA?

Ask yourself this question when it comes to evaluating the Michigan season...was it a solid 13-5 or a weak 13-5?  Was it a 13-5 that with a few breaks was 15-3?  Or was it a 13-5 with a bunch of breaks that could have easily been 10-8?  Which of those is more representative of the basketball we saw this year?  Death from above in the two tournaments?

Northwestern looms.  Twice we played them.  Twice we went overtime with them. Could have lost both.  Didn't. Positives to be sure.  But who shows up come Friday? …

To me, happy we share the title.  Not convinced at this point we are as good as either of those other two teams.  Proud of the heart, proud of the overall result.  Concerned about the two tourneys.

Bluntly, Michigan was not as good as either of the two teams they tied with. You can see that in the efficiency margins:

                      W-L   Pace    PPP   Opp. PPP    EM
1.  Ohio St.         13-5   65.4    1.10    0.93    +0.17
2.  Michigan St.     13-5   62.5    1.08    0.92    +0.16
3.  Wisconsin        12-6   58.0    1.03    0.97    +0.06
4.  Michigan         13-5   58.9    1.06    1.01    +0.05
5.  Indiana          11-7   65.4    1.11    1.06    +0.05
6.  Purdue           10-8   64.0    1.10    1.09    +0.01
7.  Northwestern     8-10   61.0    1.08    1.12    -0.04
8.  Minnesota        6-12   62.6    1.00    1.04    -0.04
9.  Iowa             8-10   65.8    1.03    1.09    -0.06
10. Illinois         6-12   63.7    0.97    1.05    -0.08
11. Penn St.         4-14   62.3    0.97    1.10    -0.13
12. Nebraska         4-14   61.9    0.93    1.09    -0.16

Kenpom will confirm that for you: it has MSU and OSU #2 and #3 behind Kentucky with Michigan idling at 20.

Meanwhile, going 13-5 would not have netted Michigan a title in any other year since the Big Ten went back to 18 games. Most years they wouldn't even be within a game. There's no denying they were fortunate to end up where they are now. Michigan lost one close Big Ten game (@ Indiana, 73-71) and won four to six (NW x 2, MSU, Purdue, maybe Minnesota and OSU depending on how you feel about five-point games). You can grub grub grub about will to win and finding ways to win and winning is for winners; I don't buy that stuff.

In terms of efficiency margin and Kenpom rankings, Michigan is about where we'd hoped they'd be before the season: slightly improved despite the loss of Darius Morris, short of truly contending for a conference title. In terms of wins they're a three seed and a Big Ten champ.

I don't say this to bring anyone down. It's wonderful. For this team to accomplish what they have is fantastic, and at this point anything after winning a 3-14 matchup in the first round is gravy.

I do think they'll be a particularly vulnerable three, though, and won't be surprised to see them flame out in the second round*. I also won't let that damage the wonderful run they went on to erase a lot of bad streaks. From a logical perspective I get the "concern"; from an emotional perspective it went from 90% house money to 110% as soon as Buford hit that shot. The worst that happens is Michigan State fans say "see you weren't really a Big Ten champ." This will not prevent the banner from going up.

---------------

*[I'm not predicting that by any means. Michigan gave Duke all they wanted last year and a hypothetical second-round opponent will be much worse than the Blue Devils were last year. Beilein is a consistent outperformer when he reaches the tourney.

HOWEVA, I do loathe the prospect of drawing a couple of the current six-seeds in Jerry Palm's bracket. They are all dangerous mid-majors: UNLV, New Mexico, Wichita State, and St. Mary's. In Kenpom's eyes that's two teams better than Michigan (Wichita, New Mexico) and two who are a dozen or so spots worse (UNLV, St. Mary's).

You may remember the Dohrmann UCLA article mentioning the success of a couple transfers out of the program: that's basically UNLV. Chace Stanback is a 6'8" guy hitting 47% from three; Mike Moser is a 6'8" guy in the top ten in defensive rebounding with high usage and an inside-out game.

I find Palm's fives a lot more palatable: Louisville (#30 Kenpom), FSU (#28), SDSU (#51), and Creighton(#35). No matter what I expect a second-round nailbiter.]

The golden child's effect on the OL.

Brian or Ace or Anybody;

I am confused, when talking about o-line prospects in the 2012 or 2013 class, some say "Fox makes an ideal RT" or "LT-T is the prototype Left Tackle.". Is the fact that Shane "Obama circa 2008" Morris is a southpaw baked into the projections as to who plays where on the OL?  Wouldn't the proto LT be moved to RT for a lefty QB, or no?

Are you and your Bloggy ilk keeping this in mind, does it make a difference for a lefty qb?

Reid McCarthy

I don't think it matters much. Many players at Michigan and elsewhere have flipped from right to left tackle without a problem; when Morris becomes the starter Michigan will put their best pass protector at right tackle and he'll adjust over the course of an offseason. Jake Long switched from right to left after his first year as a starter; Mike Schofield was pressed into service as a left guard after practicing mostly at tackle and did fine.

There might be some slight issues if Morris is either in (because of Gardner injury) or out (because of a Morris injury) of the lineup unexpectedly. In that case you probably wouldn't want to screw up the line's performance by flipping them mid-game and will be exposing either Morris's or his backup's blind side to slightly worse protection. That's life.

Even if that happens it doesn't look like there's going to be a huge difference between the starting tackles at any point in the near future. Whoever the #2 guy is will have beaten out an array of 6'5"-6'7" blue chips. This is not going to be Jake Long opposite Rueben Riley. It's going to be Almost Jake Long opposite Decent Approximation Of Jake Long.

MANBALL concerns revisited.

63014404

I WANT YOU TO JOIN UP
ALL OF YOU
THAT WAS EASIER THAN I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE

Brian,

You have argued over the past several years that you think Michigan will be at a talent disadvantage compared to teams like Ohio and SEC oversigners like Alabama, so long as the status quo persists. You've also argued that, schematically, the best way to deal with this deficit is the spread offense. I am curious if you think Hoke (and Borges) can build an offense in their mold that can truly compete on the national stage. What do you think it will take in terms of recruiting and scheme to be a legitimate contender for the national championship? Do you think that we have the ability to recruit the offensive talent we need to contend for a national title? Or is it perhaps too early to tell?

Obviously an elite defense, which I think we are building, mitigates the need for an elite offense, but recent BCS title games have demonstrated that you can't rely on just defense to win that game. Ultimately I am asking what combination of scheme and talent you think we need to achieve in order to win the national championship.

All the best,
Michael

My concerns about Michigan's ceiling have been blown away by Hoke's early recruiting returns. If Michigan is bringing in top five classes consistently—Hoke's already two for two a month into his second class—and is approaching games with the controlled aggression that Hoke, Mattison, and Borges displayed in their first year, there is no reason they can't run a conventional offense and compete for national titles.

When you have a huge talent advantage or are Wisconsin you can line up and beat heads in: top ten FEI offenses* this year include Wisconsin, Stanford, and USC. Alabama was #11. All you need to replicate that is a ton of NFL guys on the line, an NFL quarterback, and some NFL skill guys. Check, check, well… we'll see.

I get the vibe from your email that you're a bit skeptical of Michigan's skill position recruiting. I think that's premature. Shane Morris is a Henne-level QB recruit. Michigan did pick up a consensus four-star in Amara Darboh at WR and came close to flipping Brionte Dunn; this year they've got a top 100 tight end (for now, anyway—Butt will probably fall into the 100-200 range as the year progresses) and seem to lead for a couple five-star types in Ty Isaac and LaQuon Treadwell. If Hoke lands those guys Michigan's weak spot in the 2012 and 2013 classes is…

[PROCESSING]

[STILL PROCESSING]

…uh… cornerback? For now, anyway.

Even if one of those two guys escapes we're still 11 months from Signing Day; more targets will emerge. It seems like Michigan's going to be able to focus a lot of attention on any holes they have in the class come, oh, May.

My main concern with Michigan's scheme going forward is a potential over-reliance on a fullback. It seems like most pro-styles have moved to double TE sets. See this Chris Brown article on Alabama's very MANBALL, very NC-worthy offense. I hope that's where Michigan's going, too. Tight ends threaten defenses vertically in a way that fullbacks do not; they're better athletes, generally, and better targets for downfield passes. Fullbacks… eh.

I think this is also where Michigan's going. Their TE recruiting is massive—they're looking for a fifth in two years—and there's clear distinction between guys like Jake Butt and Khalid Hill, a 6'2", 230 pound guy designated a "U-back" or "move tight end" according to TomVH.

So, like, whatever. My beefs 14 months into the Hoke era are "that one punt against Illinois" and "taking a scholarship fullback." Oh, and the complete implosion of the offense in a couple games. But that's not a long term issue.

Hoke has dumped game-changer after game-changer on us since his hire to the point where the internet is making memes like this…

image

Ben Gedeon's visiting, you say?

…if we're feeling for a ceiling it's a bit hard to find right now. One will probably come, but there's no reason to go looking for it just yet.

--------------------------

*[I know FEI put up some weird results this year what with Navy and Miami in the top ten as well but it at least tries to account for strength of schedule and pace of play; FWIW, Stanford was 8th in total yardage, Wisconsin 14th, USC 21st, 'Bama 31st.

Also, as long as you're down here, how about Paul Chryst? I predict Wisconsin has a noticeable dropoff in his absence.]

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 6th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
(Reply to #20) #52
jtblue
jtblue's picture
Joined: 11/12/2009
MGoPoints: 860
yes

Which is why using a predictive tool to select my brackets was as rational of a choice as flipping a coin. There are years when Kenpom's projections would win a pool, and years (like last year) when using it would mean last place. This is why I don't think you refer to it in looking at Michigan's tournament potential - as Brian did in this post.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
(Reply to #17) #53
Michigan4Life
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 16392
Used KenPom

for my NCAA tourney picks for the last 6 years.  Won 5 of the 6 years. The only exception is last year where there were tons of upsets that made my bracket irrelevant early on.  Generally, it's a pretty good predictor on top 5 teams on who is likely to win the National Championship.  I find teams with top 10 offense and defense, more times than not, are the likeliest national champion.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 2:30 PM
(Reply to #21) #54
jtblue
jtblue's picture
Joined: 11/12/2009
MGoPoints: 860
hmmm

I picked a bad year to start

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 3:15 PM
(Reply to #17) #55
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
I didn't use it...

But I did keep track of how Kenpom would have done if you had picked their picks in your bracket....and in my pool, which isn't huge, it wasn't finishing very high.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 2:33 PM
#56
Indonacious
Joined: 01/03/2012
MGoPoints: 7451
It may also be possible that

It may also be possible that Michigan's success in end game situations is not a product of dumb luck...perhaps having confident and clutch players like Trey Burke and THJ in those late game situations allow michigan to thrive in such settings. It is also possible that that our coaches end game strategy and coaching on the defensive end is better than average. We have forced many teams into difficult shots when the game was on the line, etc. To dismiss the close game record as a fluke is, to me, a great over-simplification.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 5:46 PM
(Reply to #25) #57
champswest
champswest's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 18417
One thing UM was very good at this year was closing out games

in the final 4 minutes (if we had a close lead or close deficit).  What we were not very good at was holding big leads (IU, PSU come to mind). 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
#58
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 34191
Borges

Didn't he say that he likes the Patriots' offense and wants to emulate it?  That would seem to point toward the use of multiple tight ends. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
#59
aiglick
Joined: 11/27/2010
MGoPoints: 7860
I think Brian's point is fair

I think Brian's point is fair and is represented by our projected seeding.

We are projected to be the second best three seed by the Bracket Matrix project. The ones and twos would probably be considered elite while three and below are a step below to varying degrees.

That said, Michigan is good enough to beat anybody on any given day. Hardaway Jr. seems to have turned a corner (regained confidence) and Smotrycz and Vogrich are the x factors. If those two are on our defense and point gaurd are good enough to carry us.

We should not expect a title. However a three seed who also was not elite last year won the whole thing. Two lesser seeds made the Final Four. We have a shot and it is legitimate.

That is enough. Plus a Big Ten regular season championship. Are you serious?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 2:35 PM
#60
ClearEyesFullHart
ClearEyesFullHart's picture
Joined: 09/09/2011
MGoPoints: 2756
One word...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 2:51 PM
#61
ehatch
Joined: 09/25/2008
MGoPoints: 663
Margin of Victory

I think Margin of Victory is overrated in basketball.  Kenpom punishes UM because they didn't beat Alabama A&M by 40.  Michigan had a bad habit all season of letting overmatched opponents back into games.  Brian has lamented on seemingly multiple occassions what that 0-10 run at the end of the game did to our Kenpom rating.  The Penn State game was the perfect example.  They led by 19, let off the gas and let PSU back in the game.  The final margin was 6.  But they hit a 3 pointer as UM was walking off the court because the game was over.  UM is ranked #20 in Sagarin, same as Kenpom.  But they rank #12 when Sagarin excludes margin of victory. 

 

Michigan is 5-5 against teams ahead of them in Kenpom's rating.  So I don't really fear facing a team ahead of us in the second round.  I think the risk of that is overstated though.  Of the bracket matrix 5's and 6's only Florida is ahead of us in Kenpom. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 3:24 PM
(Reply to #35) #62
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 7194
The only teams I think we

The only teams I think we would be completely overmatched and uncompetitive with are Syracuse, Kentucky, North Carolina, and probably Kansas. All of them, beyond being obviously very good teams as they're all currently the favorites to be 1 seeds, are very long and would leave us completely overmatched down low and would stifle our ability to get perimeter shots off. The good thing about being on the 2-3 seed line is that you don't have to see one of those teams until the round of 8, giving them 3 chances (well, really 2 chances) to be upset. If we're going to make a tourney run, I think it rests on someone else taking down the top seed in our bracket. 

We're vulnerable to any team (including the first round) having an unconscious shooting night or our players being incredibly cold in an unfamiliar building, but that's the nature of the tournament for almost all teams beyond the truly elite (and I don't think the Big 10 has a team that's truly elite this year).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 4:00 PM
(Reply to #48) #63
ehatch
Joined: 09/25/2008
MGoPoints: 663
Syracuse scares me the most. 

Syracuse scares me the most.  I think UM would just end up jacking up a bunch of 3s against that zone and get run out of the building.  I think UM can do stuff against Kentucky to make it competitive.  I worry a little about Kansas but we took them to Overtime last year. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 3:10 PM
#64
somewittyname
Joined: 05/15/2009
MGoPoints: -2510
The only reason

Michigan is #20 in kenpom is because they didn't destroy bad teams in the non-con. If that is the measure of a team then sure OSU, MSU, and Wisconsin are better. Also, the notion that winning close games is pure luck is just silly. Lastly, Michigan has been playing the best down the stretch of the co-champion group and with the Dawson injury I think we have the best chances in the real tourney. Not to mention that Beilein has always done well in the tourney and is notoriously difficult to prepare for with little time.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 3:41 PM
(Reply to #44) #65
Michigan4Life
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 16392
Also,

if you take away games against shitty teams, Michigan match up quite favorably with the top big 10 team.  I believe Michigan is in the top 10-15 in that regard.  That tells me that Michigan plays much better when they face elite competitions which is good enough for me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 3:43 PM
#66
Alumnus93
Joined: 09/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5794
So we AREN'T Notre Dame,

So we AREN'T Notre Dame, Brian ?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 4:19 PM
#67
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 6282
Hoke

Brian summed up my feelings exactly: when Hoke was hired, the most positive thing I could think of was "let's give him a chance, maybe he'll be beat expectations."  But my expectations weren't that high.  I wanted Harbaugh, and saw Hoke as a consolation prize.  

*Then he hired one of the best DCs in the business, and put together an excellent staff

*Then he saved the 2011 recruiting class from oblivion.

*Then he started putting together the best recruiting class we'd seen in probably 8 years.  

*Then he led us to 11 victories, including one over Ohio and a BCS win.

*Then he finished a top 10, arguably top 5 recruiting class...and one that seems even better than its ranking.  

*Then he started building an even more highly regarded recruiting class.

*All the while he has handled the media, the factions, alumni and vested interests deftly.  

*He has refrained from gratuitous bashing of the previous coaching staff, even when and where it would be easy to do.

*He has done everything in the classiest manner possible.  

I have to say,  at this point I'm having trouble finding anything NOT to like.  You get the impression he's been honing his vision for how he'd lead the University of Michigan football team for decades.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 4:43 PM
#68
Blue boy johnson
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6350
Brian's morose take on M

Brian's morose take on M basketball is at the laughable point for me.

M won a share of the title but Brian wisely points us to the fact that OSU and MSU are actually better teams on paper. Pretty deep shit there Brian. And here I thought M was actually the more talented bunch.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 7:32 PM
#69
ca_prophet
ca_prophet's picture
Joined: 09/07/2010
MGoPoints: 3147
W and L shouldn't end the discussion ...

... but neither should any other single number.

Brian is saying that we should win our first game and anything after that is gravy - house money - because the team wasn't expected to do well.  How is that failing to celebrate their accomplishments thus far?  He's not saying they weren't deserved - he's saying they were unexpected and all the sweeter for that.

As far as our tournament prospects, I think Kenpom sees the same things I do:  that Michigan plays decent to good defense but is inconsistent, that their "best" player has been shooting poorly all season, that they're small up front and vulnerable to good post-up games, that they have no real depth anywhere, and that even the best freshmen have a habit of coming up short at the end of their first long, high-pressure season.

Michigan is better than a lot of teams - perhaps all but 12 teams in the country - but they're not an elite team.  For Michigan to make a deep run in the tournament, they'll need to step up their game from the regular season, playing solid post defense while not getting in foul trouble, and get THJ's shot to fall.

Put more simply,

HARDAWAY YOU PUT IT IN THE HOOP?

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 9:24 PM
(Reply to #65) #70
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 147119
Sweet 16.  Then it's house's

Sweet 16.  Then it's house's money.  

Get to the Regional, then see if JB can work his magic there and get to the Elite 8.  Hard to see it going further than that though, unless the 1 gets upset early.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 6th, 2012 at 8:49 PM
#71
TheGhostofYost
TheGhostofYost's picture
Joined: 04/20/2011
MGoPoints: 2971
How exactly is Michigan

How exactly is Michigan basketball "fortunate" to be where they are?  Luck doesn't put you into a tie for first place.  Other teams lost close games too, and Michigan earned where they are.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.