Mailbag: About Football! J/K, No One Emails Me About Football Anymore Comment Count

Brian

DavidDavisBadTiming[1]

bad timing

What will happen and when?

Brian,

Obviously, the central issue to our entire fanbase is what is going to happen to Dave Brandon and Brady Hoke, and if something is going to happen to either, when.  You have obviously posted at length about your opinions about what SHOULD happen, and I am excited to see part II of your coaching candidates series.  But, unless I missed it, I have not seen you post anything about what you believe WILL happen. 

Specifically, based upon where we stand now (2-4, 0-2) what is your expectation as to (1) whether Brandon will be removed, (2) whether Hoke will be fired, and (3) if you believe that either is gone, when.  I think that many of us would also be interested in your opinion  as to how the events that will transpire over the remaining 8 weeks of the regular season could impact that decision.  (For example, there is a thread on the board now asking what would happen if we win out).

I know that you are probably getting millions of emails on the topic, but I know that many of us would really be interested in knowing your opinions on this topic.

Thanks, as always, and despite everything, Go Blue!

-michgoblue

I just don't know. I'm only answering this because I get a lot of emails to this effect; usually if I can't answer something reasonably I just say so privately and that's it. But… yeah, I don't know.

One thing I've learned is that insider information is often colored by the desires of the source; slap one degree of separation between that source and you and then it seems really true and important. This is not so important when someone has a broken bone; it is vastly so when political infighting is involved. So I don't take a whole lot of stuff about Hoke staying seriously; I know it's popped up on premium message boards here and there. There's a faction amongst the old program alums who can't stand to be as flagrantly wrong as they were and will swear up and down that Hoke can be saved.

He can't. Anyone who watches his team knows that this is a disorganized mess and in year four that goes back to one guy and one guy only. There is no expectation this would get better, and in that light the successful Hoke years look like flukes born of disproportionate talent and flat-out luck, as Michigan's 2011 was.

I guess Michigan could run the table but any reasonable season projection gets you to 7-6 at best and that is a firing, if only because whoever the AD is will know that continuing with Hoke is going to be an inflection point on season ticket sales.

As far as Brandon, I do not know. I've read all there is to read and heard all there is to hear and what is clear is that here is some sort of serious support for the guy that centers around Stephen Ross and his dollars and drops off almost immediately after that. If this was a democracy he'd be booted in an 80-20 election; it is not.

I would have faith that the people around the president who have his ear because of dolla dolla bill y'all would eventually be able to come to this conclusion:

  1. Someone else would be about as good at continuing the things who make the people in the AD support him
  2. Anyone else would be less toxic to fans and especially students.

Even if you somehow believe that guy whose PR stunts will literally go in a textbook under what not to do is the best guy for the job, the next best guy for the job is 99% as capable and isn't loathed by half the Michigan fanbase. This flies in the face of our nation's CEO fetishization, but here it's undeniable.

Logic then demands I say that both guys will be gone by the end of the year, but logic ain't got nothing to do with it.

As to the timing, Hoke's not gone until after the OSU game. If he was going to get the axe immediately it would have been after the Minnesota game. Short of that happening again, he's got the rest of the year. Michigan may announce he's done before OSU, a la Earle Bruce; functionally he's your guy the rest of the year.

Brandon could go at any time. I hear that there are some meetings coming up in the next week that could be the impetus for his dismissal, but as long as Stephen Ross is backing the guy it's going to be pulling teeth.

[After THE JUMP: define risk in re: coaching candidates.]

Bob-[1]

bad photoshop

Stitt for Michigan for real?

Brian,

Do you really believe there is any chance Michigan will take a look at Bob Stitt or any other lower division coach?  I like the idea of finding the next Beilein, but I just don't see this having a chance unless you are hired as the next AD.

My daughter happens to be a freshman at Mines and I'll be going out to a game in a few weeks.  I've asked her to do some advance scouting but the only way she is going to a game is if Exo or BTS is performing at half-time.  I'm pretty sure she can tell you more about that Girl's Generation video with the Iowa helmet than about football, so I imagine any information from her would be useless anyway.  Is there anything specific I should be watching during the game? 

Best Regards,

Kevin

No, I don't expect Michigan looks at Stitt. Everyone filled the comments of the post containing him with assertions he was way too much of a risk, and it'll take Harbaugh-level stones to defy that perception. I wish they'd at least look at him. Yes, he's a risk. So is everyone else.

My expectation without an AD change is that Michigan ends up with an NFL coordinator, with Mullen going to Florida. I'm worried that NFL coordinator might be Teryl Austin or Harold Goodwin, both guys with a total of two years as a coordinator at any level to their name. But they have been in Ann Arbor so they are in the rumor mill. It will not be a Harbaugh. You can't throw a brick in Ann Arbor without hitting a well-informed guy who will swear up and down that Jim Harbaugh loathes Dave Brandon, and some of those well-informed guys played with him so they would know. (The man will not mind that you hit him with a brick. He will think it a welcome distraction.*)

As far as what a Mines game might tell you, I think the most accurate feel you could acquire would be envisioning what it would feel like to be a New Mexico Highlands or whatever fan going up against Stitt. Large chunks of my spread fandom come from the feeling of dread I get when Michigan tries to stop one. Do the things they do seem hard to stop? Are they asking one guy to do something in space a lot? How many times do they get something that seems easy and set up by the rest of their offense?

I approve of your daughter's K-Pop hobbies. Tell her that football is a grim thing and that she should concentrate on wicked dance moves if she is considering starting a blog.

*[DON'T THROW BRICKS AT PEOPLE WHO KNOW JIM HARBAUGH. MGoBlog is not organizing the Throw Bricks At Jim Harbaugh Acquaintances Rally.]

I mean, I get so many suggestions like this and you want to talk risk?

Pep Hamilton

Seems like an NFL coordinator that should have made your short list. Plays manball and seems to have the right mix of intelligence and incompetent stubbornness that might appeal to higher ups at Michigan. One degree removed from Harbaugh at Stanford, so he's basically a Michigan man.  No one will notice that he's basically just riding Andrew Luck's coattails. Probably has no desire to coach college, though.

Elliot

Hamilton had a couple years as OC at Stanford under David Shaw and then moved to the Colts; before that he was a position coach in the NFL and coached at Howard. Sure, I guess he's plausible in the same way all the NFL guys are plausible but if you're asking me which guy seems more attractive, I'm 100% Stitt.

Recruiting is a wash. Stitt's at least done it in his D-II engineering school way. Stitt is the man at his school, no question; Hamilton and everyone else is in this maelstrom of NFL data and QC coaches and everything being regimented everywhere. I want the guy working with fewer resources than Michigan can offer, not more, and I want the guy who currently successful college coaches workshop with instead of the guy who might just look good because of Andrew Luck.

Dan Mullen is far and away the #1 option after the Harbaugh Hail Marys; after that anyone you get is going to have question marks unless someone unexpected pops up. I just want an obviously good, smart coach. Stitt is that. Pep Hamilton doesn't have a tenth of his track record, nor does anyone in the NFL.

Hiring stuff. 

I know most people want Dave Brandon out and people want an AD with some experience.  So how hard would it be to hire an AD away from another school during the football season?

Thanks
Andy

I think it would take two weeks notice. Nothing about an AD's job means things will go off the rails if there's an interim in place during football season. The only reason for hesitation would be if that department was also about to fire their football coach; none of the guys Michigan is likely to look at are going to do that this year.

probably not.

Any chance we can get an mgoblog sponsored Chili Con Carnival with Dave Brandon as the guest of honor?  He can even have 1 free ticket to ride the pony.

Justin

NO (maybe)

Comments

Michigan Difference

October 9th, 2014 at 4:24 PM ^

Interesting thought.  Maybe I'm being naive, but I have a hard time believing a guy that would give $300 million to his alma mater would intentionally sabotage Michigan like that to get a coach.  I assumed his support of Brandon is genuine, but I can't for the life of me understand why...

skegemogpoint

October 9th, 2014 at 12:45 PM ^

totally disagree with Brian that Dan Mullen is "far and away the #1 option after the Harbaugh hail mary."  This fails for multiple reasons: 1) the obvious, there's no way to know who the AD will be; 2) there's no way to know what the hiring AD is thinking, and 3) sounds more like Brian's guess.  I can think of several other coaches I'd prefer over Mullen including: John Harbaugh and Les Miles.  Sloppy work on that one.

ST3

October 9th, 2014 at 1:20 PM ^

Brian giving his opinion, the nerve of him. /s

I don't think that's sloppy work at all. He's not trying to speak for everyone, he's answering a question. If there is anything sloppy, it's you writing that John Harbaugh is preferred after the Harbaugh hail mary. Either Harbaugh is a hail mary candidate.

biakabutuka ex…

October 9th, 2014 at 12:57 PM ^

I wish Brian's official stance were that he wanted Stitt as OC. I haven't heard a word about what he can do for defense, he's admitted he'd be interested in a carte blanche OC position, let's face it--he's not proven at anywhere close to the Div-I level, and it's 10 times more realistic, which is to say a 1% chance of happening. He could be Gus Malzahn 2.0 or Gerry Faust 2.0. Malzahn was an OC first though.

BlueHills

October 9th, 2014 at 1:01 PM ^

This is what I have heard from someone I consider very well connected (I'm sorry, but he's a good friend and I'm not outing him):

Brandon will continue as long as he has Ross' confidence, and right now he still has Ross' confidence.

At least for 2015, Hoke will continue to coach at Michigan if Brandon is the AD.

Ross wants Harbaugh for the Dolphins.

Disclaimer: My friend is friendly with certain Regents. He could be telling me his interpretation, he could be repeating what he's heard, and he could be wrong.

People sometimes think they know what they don't know. So none of this is carved in stone. I don't know whether I'm blowing smoke repeating this or not, but it's what I'm hearing, and it's the best I can do.

umumum

October 9th, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^

a worse case scenario.  In fact, it is no change whatsover.  I expect Michigan to do less (change-wise) than I think they should, but I cannot imagine zero changes.  The next 12 months would be a shitstorm and that cannot be acceptable to Schlissel or the Regents.

[and if we can't take a coach because Ross wants him, then he truly has purchased the Athletic Department]

BlueHills

October 9th, 2014 at 5:31 PM ^

Exactly, it would be no change whatsoever.

Please understand, I'm not advocating this, and I won't like it any more than you do if it happens. I think Brandon needs to go, and if that means pissing off Ross, I'm fine with that.

All I've done is repeat what I've heard. Nothing more.

Neg me if you want to shoot the messenger, as that's all I am in this case.

Chitown Kev

October 9th, 2014 at 1:17 PM ^

is that I could actually see Michigan pulling off an upset win in Columbus.

To this point at least, Hoke has always prepared well for Ohio and the 3 Michigan-Ohio games under his tenure have been entertaining.

treetown

October 9th, 2014 at 1:23 PM ^

In baseball they talk about the five tools: hitting for average, hitting for power, running, fielding and throwing - and how few players really have all 5.

In college coaching a similar pentad exists. They are

1. Recruiting - getting the best talent available

2. Teaching/training - taking raw talent and making it better

3. Football strategy and tactics - analyzing the opponent, producing a coherent game plan and making necessary changes during the game.

4. NCCA, Conference and School compliance - all of the other things that go into running a football program.

5. Alumni and public relations - making nice-nice with the alumni, central campus and the community of supportors and fans.

Like in baseball very few coaches have all five attributes. Some are great at one part (like point 3) but not so good or terrible with other parts.

Right now the current regimen seem to get a passing grade on 1, a failing grade on 2, a low C on 3, a passing grade on 4 and were it not for the losses - a high grade on 5.

It is good to have dreams.

 

 

 

Laveranues

October 9th, 2014 at 1:24 PM ^

We should hire three foreign MIT grads that have never heard of football as co-head coaches, give them a rule book, and see what happens.  At least we'd see some innovation, and they would be smart enough to throw a bubble screen on 3rd and 3 when the corners are 15 yards off the LOS.

cstrable

October 9th, 2014 at 1:26 PM ^

Does Phil Knight have a say in who Oregon hires as their AD?

 

Not sure why they would let Ross have so much power. So that story sound bologna. There's a 0% chance Hoke is still the coach in 2015 if Brandon is still the AD.

Njia

October 9th, 2014 at 1:59 PM ^

That DB would be fired sometime before the end of the season. If Stephen Ross really is a puppet master, then I'm increasingly favoring the notion that he's here through at least the 2015 calendar year. If he believes his job is not at risk, then he's as likely to keep Hoke around as not.

I think I just threw up a little in my mouth.

umfanchris

October 9th, 2014 at 2:11 PM ^

Why does everybody think that an NFL coordinator is going to leave their job for a college Head coaching position? I can only think of two cases where that has happened without that Coach being Fired from NFL (Charlie Weiss- ND, Will Muschamp -Aub def cord). I know there are a couple other position coaches that left for college, but that is different.

 

My thought is that most NFL coordinators eventually would want an NFL head coaching job. If they are already a desired coordinator in the NFL (which I hope they are if Mich is looking at them), then they are probably in line for an NFL job soon. For instance if Austin leads the Lions defense for a couple good years then he might start seeing NFL head coaching offers come in this year or next year. Also switching to college means you have to go on the recruiting trail. Granted some guys like that, but I can’t see that as being a selling point to most guys.

 

I’m sure there are other instances that I don’t know of where a coordinator leaves on his own free will to be a college head coach. But it doesn’t seem to be a regular occurrence by any means.

michelin

October 9th, 2014 at 2:45 PM ^

Remember that Schlissel, not Ross, is Brandon's boss.  So we should be asking: what does Schlissel want?  Consider two factors.

1. Schlissel, who was at Berkeley, and Harbaugh who was at nearby Stanford, may share academic values.  Granted, Harbaugh's comments about academics may still alienate many UM alums--I myself did not like them one bit.  But they may also reflect a vision that Schlissel and Harbaugh share about the ideal balance between athletics and academics.

2. While the personalities of Schlissel and Harbaugh seem to differ, and while Schlissel may not want a dominant football coach, he does seem like a pragmatic guy.   Since college presidents have a notroiously high risk of a short tenure, Schissel's may want to firmly cement his his position and legacy.  So ask youself: Would he more likely accomplish that 

(1) by cow-towing to Ross and keeping Brandon--over the objections of many Regents--who can hire or fire a president?  Also, what if keeping Brandon would prevent a willing Harbaugh from coming to UM?  That would not look so good.

or (2) by getting rid of Brandon in favor of an AD that Harbaugh favors, then winning a competition for Harbaugh?  Pie in the sky?  Maybe.  But that would be quite a feather in Schlissel's mortarboard cap.  And it would seem perfectly consistent with his emphasis on academic values.

Granted, the latter may be a longshot; and these are only two of many possibiities.  But I have doubts that UM would net more alumni contributions by following Ross' preferences for DB.  Ross may already think he's given UM enough, and a lot of other alienated alumni might be less willing to make contributions if DB were retained.