Mailbag! Comment Count

Brian

Brian, I liked your spring summary and I agreed with most of the points.

However, I left the spring game wondering if the performance of our offense (and Forcier, to be more precise) was more indicative of our lack of depth on defense. They played the second team defense and generally had their way with them. Considering how bad our offense was last year, does this just show that our defense has bad depth or that our offense (and Forcier) will actually be serviceable/good next year?

Obviously, this is the million dollar question, but I honestly left the spring game more worried about our defense than impressed with our offense.

Please allay my fears! Thanks.

I will attempt to do so via the magic of bullet points:

  1. That wasn't the second team defense, it was somewhere between the second and third team defense with half of the starters injured or largely held out.
  2. Depth should improve in the fall when the freshmen arrive.
  3. The defense is adapting to a new scheme, their third in three years. While this isn't good they should improve more quickly than a team that knows what it's doing and still sucks.
  4. Forcier may have had a lot of opportunities he might not otherwise but at least he took advantage of them in a way that I don't think Sheridan or Threet would have, at least not so consistently.

While I don't think Forcier is going to finish many games 11/14 with three touchdowns against no interceptions, the thing to watch for are things that don't depend on the defense: when a slant comes open does Forcier see it and throw it on time and accurately? When Roundtree bursts open deep does Forcier hit him? How many horrible interceptions, or balls that should rightly have been horribly intercepted, did he throw? By this measure, Forcier did very well.

Your larger point about the seemingly huge dropoff to the second-string defense, well… yeah. I got nothing for that.

This next one caused this late mailbag to be posted today, because today is "Michigan Football Solstice":

Today (April 15) is the longest possible point between actually, non-scrimmage Michigan football games.

There are 288 days between Nov. 22, 2008 (when Michigan last played, @ OSU) and Sept. 5 (when they next play, at home against Western.)

Nov 22. was 144 days ago.

Sept. 5 is 144 days from now.

We’re now closer to the next Michigan football game than we were to the last one.

I've got a listserv with fellow alumni where we're discussing how to celebrate.  Pop in the DVD of the 2004 Michigan/MSU game?  Scour the internet to discover if any former D1 athletes have a year of eligibility left and might be interested in enrolling at UM and trying out at QB?  In honor of this year's Michigan Football Solstice falling on April 15th, maybe we could have a Teabag Paulus Party?  Can we institute some kind of MGoBlog approved ritual for Michigan fans to celebrate this solemn occasion every year? 

- Daryl Vautour

Well, hopefully Michigan football solstice isn't ever on April 15th again. This is usually going to be an early summer sort of event, so early summer sorts of activities would be best: grilling outside, having a beer, maybe lighting a squirrel on fire with a magnifying glass.* Most of the suggestions above are sad or temporary things, but setting aside some time to watch an old glory past sounds good. So: grill tubes of meat, drink beer, and watch… uh… something uplifting from the 1985 season, if available. And you're not doing anything RIGHT NOW.

*(Just me? Oh.)

Comments

West Texas Blue

April 15th, 2009 at 6:28 PM ^

early summer sorts of activities would be best: grilling outside, having a beer, maybe lighting a squirrel on fire with a magnifying glass. Substitute the statement on the squirrel with "spending a ridiculous amount of time on the lake" and that's my summer in a nutshell.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 15th, 2009 at 6:35 PM ^

I don't think the worrisomeness of the new scheme can be overlooked for the defense. I mean, let's see, attempting to implement brand-new scheme while at the same time very worried over the depth of the line.....I think we've seen that movie before. To be fair, the changes on defense are not as earth-shattering as last year's changes on offense, but still.

jamiemac

April 15th, 2009 at 7:18 PM ^

Sweet, my favorite UM team all time!!! Not sure whats available for video. I know you can buy the Fiesta Bowl win over Nebraska at NCAA On Demand. Wolverine Historian also has several highlight clips. Otherwise, Merry Michigan Solstice Day Everybody and May God Bless Your Cotton Pickin' Maize And Blue Hearts.

Ernis

April 15th, 2009 at 7:51 PM ^

Wouldn't this date be better described as an equinox? Which are the times equidistant from the solstices, while the solstices are the extremes signaling the change of seasons. /correct

Cosmic Blue

April 16th, 2009 at 1:27 PM ^

by your own reasoning, this is definitely more like a solstice. This would equate to the winter solstice, the extreme dead-time in michigan football where the days are shortest, etc. The equinox's (equini?) would be more equivalent to the first and last games of the season

travelingblue

April 15th, 2009 at 10:44 PM ^

Assuming our second and third team defenses are equal to or greater than Eastern's, Delaware St's, Indiana's, and, maybe, Western's, our offense should rock in at least four games this year!

Don

April 16th, 2009 at 9:47 AM ^

It would have been far better if he'd gone 5-14 with no TDs and three picks. Then we would feel great about the depth on our defense.

imafreak1

April 16th, 2009 at 9:51 AM ^

I'm just indulging myself here picking at something that has become pretty standard in various types of media. The fact that Michigan's defense is learning a new system is important for this season's preformance. Does the knowledge that Michigan's defense was learning a new system last year and the year before hold any predictive power or offer insight into this season? I don't think so. Consequently, it is interesting to note that this is the 3rd defensive system in 3 years but not applicable to the future. At first I was confused by the MSM's use of the term "teabagger" for the 4/15/09 protestors--"does that mean what I thought it meant?" Then I surprised, "do they not know what that means?" Now I'm just amused. Some of the media must not have realized (they did dump tea bags after all) while others must be chuckling to themselves.