Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (52)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 1 day ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 2 days ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 2 days ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 3 days ago
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 3 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 842 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 769 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 743 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 644 views
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 529 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 17 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 17 comments
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 11 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    0 replies
  • Mark May Trolls Ohio State Again, Buckeyes Fans Let Him Have It On Twitter
    5 replies
  • OT - Entymological Voracity
    7 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    107 replies
  • Baseball Eliminated from B1G
    17 replies
  • Denard, other rookies discuss Star Trek
    43 replies
  • Urbs and his obsession with butts
    48 replies
  • Very OT: The Hangover 3 *Thread May Contain Spoilers*
    55 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    138 replies
  • Awesome Uniform Timeline on MVictors
    33 replies
  • Baby’s life saved with 3D printed device at C.S. Mott
    34 replies
  • OT: Mott Takeover
    15 replies
  • Jersey Name Patches
    24 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    70 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    53 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    107 replies
  • Mark May Trolls Ohio State Again, Buckeyes Fans Let Him Have It On Twitter
    5 replies
  • OT - Entymological Voracity
    7 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    0 replies
  • Denard, other rookies discuss Star Trek
    43 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    138 replies
  • Baseball Eliminated from B1G
    17 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    146 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    90 replies
  • Very OT: The Hangover 3 *Thread May Contain Spoilers*
    55 replies
  • Awesome Uniform Timeline on MVictors
    33 replies
  • Urbs and his obsession with butts
    48 replies
  • Baby’s life saved with 3D printed device at C.S. Mott
    34 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    70 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade AA for some Red Hot Softball (EDIT: Fri 2pm & Sat Noon)
    32 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    146 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    145 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    139 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    138 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    107 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    90 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • This college baseball team is the best at postgame interviews

    national champs baby

    0 comments
  • Rounding up the latest in NCAA absurdities.

    Patrick Hruby is doing God's work.

    0 comments
  • Cornell wrestler tops Michigan's Trey Burke for Sports Illustrated award | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

    first comment: "EVERY ATHLETE HAS ASPIRATIONS OF WINNING AND WE HAVE OUR FAVORITES BUT IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO OTHER STUDENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, TOO!"

    0 comments
  • Burke hearing he'll go two through six in NBA draft

    stupid Pistons and their refusal to tank properly

    0 comments
  • 2013 NHL Draft Prospect: Andrew Copp

    rundown of Michigan's riser

    0 comments
  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Lizard Brain Tornado Apocalypse Derp Derp Derp

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — October 17th, 2011 at 11:49 AM — 255 comments
Filed under:
  • 2011 michigan state
  • al borges denard fusion cuisine
  • craig roh
  • dave brandon creates the future
  • derp
  • derpbord
  • jake ryan
  • jonas mouton suspension fiasco
  • uniforms
  • uniformz
  • william gholston has emotional problems

10/15/2011 – Michigan 14, Michigan State 28 – 10/15/2011, 6-1, 2-1 Big Ten

tornado-witchdenard-throwing-msu

right via Melanie Maxwell/AnnArbor.com

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING THROWING 30 YARDS DOWNFIELD IN A CYCLONE
YOU'RE ASKING DENARD ROBINSON TO BE JOE MONTANA IN A TRASH TORNADO
YOU'RE COMING OUT FIVE WIDE
RUN THE FOOTBALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-Brian Cook's brain channeling Mike Valenti, 3:07 PM 10/15/2011

---------------------

The now rapidly developing lizard brain theory of college football coaching states that there is a certain level of pressure above which rationality goes out the window and coaches revert to who they really are. It came to me in a horrible epiphany when Lloyd Carr punted in the 2005 Ohio State game less than a quarter after going for it on his side of the field. Coaches panic, go to their binkies, and then try to convince you otherwise in the post-game.

Different coaches have different levels. Ron Zook reverts to the lizard brain on the opening kickoff of every game. Kirk Ferentz makes it about five minutes in. We don't know about Tressel because he constructed his team such that the lizard brain was right. Les Miles exists on an entirely different axis with taffy on one end and victory on the other. He is the only one who escapes. The lizard brain is unavoidable.

Al Borges's lizard brain kicked in after Vincent Smith ran for two yards on Michigan's first offensive play of the second half. First and ten after that:

  1. Robinson sacked for –9 yards
  2. Smith rush for two yards
  3. Gardner incomplete
  4. Robinson incomplete
  5. Offsides MSU
  6. Gardner rush for four yards
  7. Robinson rush for –1 yard
  8. Robinson slant complete for 34 yard touchdown
  9. Robinson sacked
  10. Robinson rush for –1 yard
  11. Robinson INT

While this doesn't paint a pretty picture for the run game, either, after halftime Michigan passed on 60% of its first downs, got one completion on a short route that turned into a big gain when Roundtree broke a tackle, and did nothing else.

For the game Michigan tried to pass at least 41 times*, averaging 2.8 yards per attempt and giving up a defensive touchdown.
TWO POINT EIGHT YARDS
DEFENSIVE TOUCHDOWN
RUN THE FOOTBALL!!!!
…

…

Sorry. Sorry.

Michigan tried to run the ball 26 times and averaged… oh, Jesus… 5.2 yards per carry. Fitzgerald Toussaint got two carries, Denard twelve.

I just realized this is what it's like to be Walter Sobchak.

calmer-than-you-are

MARK IT 2.8.
(This is not a threat against anyone's person. Do I look like Will Gholston?)

So, yeah. There is no way to put this without getting an email from some guy concerned about his eleven year old without resorting to Bloom County methods. That was the dumbest goddamned $%&*^-*$#*ing #&!$brained dip*&%$ mother*(%$ing horse_+$# goat-&^%t &%$*y-infested $%^&stick playcalling I have ever &*$ing seen in my life. I see you, Valenti. I get it now. I get it.

----------------------------

ON FOURTH AND ONE AL BORGES HAD THE QUARTERBACK, WHO IS THE MOST DANGEROUS RUNNING QUARTERBACK IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL, TURN HIS BACK TO THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE AS IF EVERY DEFENSE EVER CONCEIVED AGAINST THE GUY DOESN'T HAVE EDGE CONTAIN OF HIM AS THEIR FIRST THREE PRIORITIES

----------------------------

ON FOURTH AND ONE AL BORGES HAD THE QUARTERBACK, WHO IS THE MOST DANGEROUS RUNNING QUARTERBACK IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL, TURN HIS BACK TO THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE AS IF EVERY DEFENSE EVER CONCEIVED AGAINST THE GUY DOESN'T HAVE EDGE CONTAIN OF HIM AS THEIR FIRST THREE PRIORITIES

-----------------------------

THAT AGAIN

-----------------------------

Okay, okay… sorry. Sorry. I'm vented.

What we have to deal with now is the cold certainty that the honeymoon is over and our football coaches are football coaches, like they always are, and we cannot assume that everything will be honeydew and game theory from now on. Hoke punted on fourth and short-ish from inside the opponent 40. Borges did that above.

That's okay, really. Given the crapfest we endured on offense I almost can't blame Hoke for the punts. And in many other situations I prefer an offensive coordinator who wants to throw when he's in trouble to one who wants to go into a shell. The Morris/upperclass Gardner offense won't put the Ferrari in neutral until the second half. Recruit like they're recruiting and coach like it seems they can and eventually we'll get to a nice place to be.

In the near term, though, those happy thoughts over the first few weeks about Borges adjusting to Denard evaporated in a flurry of sacks after which you look at the receivers and there are three guys thirty yards downfield with no one between them and the carnage. You can fake it against defenses that can't play, but when it comes down to it the combination of Borges and Denard makes everyone wonder that bad old question about whether he should really play QB. IE: the worst-case scenario from the offseason.

A certain genre of Michigan fan will say this was always who Denard was, but last year he completed 58% of his passes for 9.3 YPA and a 12-9 TD:INT ratio in the Big Ten. Whatever his limitations were they seemed a lot less limiting last year, when Michigan stressed the defense to the edges and exploited the ruthless equation of the spread: a running quarterback means someone's open if you can just find him.

I don't blame Borges for that. You can't up and be someone else at the drop of a hat. If we are again pointing the finger of blame it's aiming at Rich Rodriguez for not deserving a fourth year. I do blame Borges for throwing almost two-thirds of the time when that should be inverted. The incoherent grab-bagginess of the offense is a natural effect of hiring a pro-style guy with a spread offense. Running Denard twelve times in a trash tornado is not.

So here we are, with football coaches instead of magical fairies who can do anything. That sucks. The honeymoon over, life re-asserts itself.

*[I'm not sure how many QB carries were scrambles. I counted the 8-yard Gallon scramble as a pass.]

Non-Bullets of I Wish They Were Real Bullets

Hurray clowniformz! So much for a one-time thing. It's as if they knew they would need to both play and look like Yakety Sax:

That's the third time this year we've had a uniform stunt, this one the ugliest and stupidest of them all*. It's like Dave Brandon took in the majesty that is the Spartan Stadium game experience and said "someday this will be mine." Chengelis's headline on the subject…

Spartans, Wolverines compete with fashion statements, too

…is even more evidence that Dave Brandon Gets It less than anyone has ever not Gotten It before.

I had a wow experience. Did you? Everyone looking forward to the analwowing in Dallas next year when we take our freshman defensive tackles and paper-thin offensive line into a game we are absolutely not prepared for? CEOs are psychopaths.

[Bonus: last time we did this was 1976, the very heart of the era when people lost their minds about fashion. We lost then, too.]

*[No, that guy on every message board who could spin Denard Robinson's arm being torn off by William Gholston as a positive for the program, they did not look good. A sane political system would prevent you from voting. You suck. I'm sure you've got a comment all lined up to complain about the complaining. Bring it, I've got an itchy trigger finger today.]

Obligatory personal foul section. Yeah, it was ugly. The truly sad thing was that band of morons getting away with 120 yards in penalties without losing. If we had a sane offensive plan and/or a plan to deal with snap jumping those personal fouls are only 10% enraging—the intent to injure bits—and 90% hilarious Sparty being Sparty. That's where we are as a program right now: we can play the stupidest 85 people ever assembled on one football team and still lose by two touchdowns.

Gholston should obviously be suspended at least two games for the helmet rip—as bad an intent-to-injure play as the Reynolds-Sorgi incident—and the punch, which has been established by the great Jonas Mouton Suspension Fiasco as a one-gamer. There was also a less obvious judo chop that forced Lewan out of the game for a few plays. I bet nothing happens, because that's the way life goes.

This is the second consecutive year a player has been knocked out late after the game is decided by a dirty hit. Look at Dantonio's jaw… you are feeling very sleepy… you cannot put together incidents to see a pattern forming… so much… fake… bible… Spock.

I guess targeting other football players is progress relative to beating up mechanical engineers en masse.

Edge destruction. Early candidates for big negative days in the defense UFR: Roh and Ryan, who were targeted by the MSU offensive coaching staff to good effect. MSU's first TD drive was a series of easy outside runs as those two got destroyed. They improved a bit as the day went on but were clearly a weak spot targeted effectively.

Woolfolk also got pulled after a series or two; he's obviously hurt. Avery was the nickel corner since MSU doesn't spread to run much.

Man, Baker. It kills me whenever I see a really good running back go against Michigan because the mind immediately plugs that guy into rotation at the RB spot post-Minor and groans. Baker is one of those guys, a leg-churning tackle-breaker who would turn a lot of Michigan's two yard runs into five or six or more.

Penetration. They had it. Michigan didn't. Why not?

One part: It's clear all these late-developing passing routes are exposing the Mark Huyge we saw trying and failing to block for Tate Forcier as a sophomore. After a year of being covered up by the spread 'n' shred he's back to allowing sacks on a three man rush.

But the interior line? I saw Molk ole guys. Molk! How is this year four of MSU using a simple parlor trick of slanting under at the snap without two different coaching staffs being able to do anything about it?

Old school punting. Positive of a sort: When asked to coffin-corner punts Will Hagerup does a pretty good job. Haven't seen that in 15 years—you know it's old school when Sap is referencing Harry Kipke when handing out helmet stickers.

Why "of a sort": if you can coffin-corner a punt you probably shouldn't be punting.

The Minnesota plays. Doesn't seem too smart to have run a zillion new things against Minnesota now, does it? Michigan brought out the sprint counter once and it got stuffed—would MSU have been prepared for it if they hadn't seen it against Minnesota? Since Michigan isn't running the QB stretch that motion was a tipoff the counter was coming and an expected counter is a dead counter.

Here

Inside the Box Score points out a huge swing play:

The refs did miss one backwards pass from Cousins, who clearly let go of the ball on state’s 37 and hit his receiver’s hands on the 36. The explanation was really lame, something along the lines of Michigan didn’t recover the football right away. The way I saw it, the ball hit the ground and the Michigan defender bent down and picked it up. What am I missing?

With no one around the ball except Wolverines if that's correctly called that is a potentially game-changing defensive score. This isn't a bad offsides penalty or uncalled false start, it's a touchdown being wiped off the board because the refs blew it dead too early. Very frustrating. I thought they were supposed to let it go if it was too close to be sure about now.

Also there is this:

Our leading tacklers were Gordon, Kovacs, Roh, and Countess, with 8, 6, 6, and 6, respectively. Do you notice what’s missing? Linebackers. Demens was the leading tackler among the linebackers with 5. I noticed this week that Touch the Banner was high on Demens for last week’s performance against NU, but Brian was critical of him in the UFRs. I think this game was the tie-breaker. I don’t think our LBs were productive enough. Baker gashed us all day long. His longest run was only 25 yards, yet he gained 167 yards on 26 carries. State was consistently able to pound the football against us.

How many times did MSU linebackers shoot out to the sideline on plays that looked like they were going to work and hold them down to a few yards, and how many times did Michigan linebackers do that? That's not always on the linebackers—could be on the M OL not getting out or DL not taking on doubles effectively—but given what we saw against Northwestern I'm betting some of the big chunk plays from Baker see linebacker minuses aplenty.

Hoke for Tomorrow is briefer. I would like to interject about this amongst the things learned:

That strong winds + Kirk Cousins > strong winds + Denard Robinson.

Cousins averaged 5 YPA and threw a backwards pass that should have been a disaster. Drops had a lot to do with it but it's possible the wind messed with both WR and QB, which is even more reason that throwing 41 times in the trash tornado was inexplicably dumb.

Elsewhere

Media, as in stuff. The official site valiantly found highlight-type-substances in the wreckage:

There are also postgame interviews if you'd like to watch everyone on Michigan's team refusing to answer questions about the personal fouls. Mike DeSimone collects pictures from across the world.

Blogs. Come on, Braves and Birds picture comparison. Come on. The Hoover Street Rag does something long and complicated that I don't understand. Parody of a bad NBC hour-long drama? Mathlete says Michigan underperformed expectations by 28 points, his worst number of the season for all of I-A. Various bullets from MVictors. Touch the Banner also has them.

BWS says something about little brother, which no offense whenever I hear the word "brother" in relation to Michigan State now my eyes glaze over. Holdin' the Rope recaps. MZone as well.

National variety from Doctor Saturday:

On seven trips into MSU territory after the opening possession, Michigan punted on five and turned it over on downs on a sixth.

Series by series, punt by punt, the sense of progress over the first half of the season dissolved into a disheveled mess. The running game stalled. The two-quarterback shuffle failed to gin up any semblance of a steady passing game, or a big play with Robinson lined up as a wide receiver. The pass protection broke down. In almost every aspect, it was Michigan's worst nightmare: At the exact point on the calendar that optimistic starts began to give way to collapse each of the last two years, the Wolverines  looked like a team on the verge of collapse.

Newspapers. Michigan fell to 17th/18th in the polls. I did not find anything else of a newspapery variety that is open in my tabs.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
October 17th, 2011 at 1:09 PM | The same ESPN (Score:2)
stubob
stubob's picture
Joined: 08/20/2008
MGoPoints: 1263

that's been pushing Vonzante Burfect all season as a player who "plays hard, except for that whole personal foul thing." They were talking about him on Gameday and said they basically thought he should play more like last year.

"Why would you ask a dumb question like that?"  -Lloyd Carr

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:12 PM | Me neither (Score:2 Normal)
itauditbill
Joined: 06/30/2010
MGoPoints: 118

Hell I was listening to 107.3 this morning, the announcers had on Dantonio and he was suggesting that perhaps the refs were a little quick to throw the flags.

We know he's not going to do anything.

I don't think Delaney will either.

Perhaps MSU is channeling James Caan from Rollerball here!

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:45 PM | I agree on the bad offensive gameplan (Score:2 Normal)
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1054

I felt we should have been attacking the perimeter more, and doing REAL ACTUAL ZONE READS where the QB and RB both sell the run and it's not clear who has the ball until they are both at the LoS.  That 4th and Inches was particularly bad.  

That said, Brian--you really have your blinders on about our offense in the Big 10 last year.  You present stats on Denard's passing and running...but what about against MSU in non-wind last year?

PASSING: 17/29 for 215 yards and 1/3

RUNNING: 21 carries for 86 yards

Those are not good numbers.  Sure they're better than this year, but it's hard not to imagine we'd end up in a roughly similar place had there been no 40mph wind, at least in terms of passing.

As for his running, he averaged only 2.3 yards/carry this year against MSU, so that's actually MEASURABLY WORSE than his YPA (5.2 yards per attempt).  

When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing. -Bo

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:51 PM | Come on (Score:1)
msoccer10
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 1585

Last year we moved the ball against State. The part of last years numbers that weren't good are the interceptions, which were crippling but not Rodriguez's fault.

The wind was obviously a factor, but the offense would have been better this year with 10 returning starters. Instead it is worse. There is no evidence I have seen to the contrary.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:04 PM | I really fail to see how the (Score:5 Normal)
BlueVoix
BlueVoix's picture
Joined: 06/25/2009
MGoPoints: 5546

I really fail to see how the offense is that much worse.  We're a different offense, and arguably less exciting, but we control the ball better, hold on to it (at least the RBs do), and have put up a good number of points against everyone but one team.  The teams we have played this year are better on defense than the teams from last year, so naturally you see a slight statistical drop.  It's not fair to say the offense is definitely worse until we play the full slate of games.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:32 PM | OK (Score:1)
msoccer10
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 1585

Yes, we do need to see what this team does against Iowa, Illinios, Nebraska and OSU. And the numbers for the beginning of the season aren't bad. Top 30 before the MSU game.

But at this point last year Denard was completing better than 60% of his passes, we had a lot more yards and everything seemed easy. This year its a struggle. Nothing seems crisp on offense the way it did last year and our stats were better up to this point last  year.

I don't think the teams we have played this year are better on defense than last year to this point. To me it seems about the same, without doing the stats research.

And I have made several posts in this thread about our offense last year compared to this. Let me just say, I like Hoke. I think he will end up with a much better career at Michigan than Rodriguez had. Our team is exactly where I expected them to be this year (actually, maybe a little better) I figured we'd be 5-2 or 6-1 (depending on the ND game). I thought our defense would be better but our offense would take a step back, which I think it has.

For the rest of the year I am looking for a few things. Do we keep improving each game? Do we finish 9-3? Do we beat OSU? Does our team collapse down the stretch? If this team keeps improving and we don't tank like the last two years, Hoke will have proven he is the right man for the job, even if we are suffering some pains on offense right now.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 3:08 PM | We moved the ball when down 31-7 (Score:3 Normal)
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1054

Which is the same thing that happened against Penn State (when down 31-10), Iowa (when down 28-7) and Wisconsin (when down 24-0).  In none of those games was the outcome in question.  

Against Ohio and Purdue, our offense was just bad.  

 

When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing. -Bo

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:52 PM | caveat (Score:1)
Qmich
Joined: 03/30/2011
MGoPoints: 58

about passing attempts and inteceptions being WAY more common than rushes and fumbles.

Also a caveat about last year's defense being last year's defense.

I believe that Michigan Football will not merely endure: it will prevail

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:54 PM | Futile (Score:-1 Flamebait)
ForeverVoyaging
Joined: 09/24/2011
MGoPoints: 262

Trying to convince Brian we didn't have the single greatest offense in the history of college football last year is futile. We scored 24 points on MSU and OSU combined, and all he can talk about for the next 6 months is how we put up 3 touchdowns on Wisconsin in garbage time.

If only Brian could convince the NCAA to let them score football games based on total yards instead of, you know, actual points . . .

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:07 PM | Dude (Score:2 Normal)
coastal blue
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1791

You seriously don't get it. 

It's not that the offense was the greatest thing ever last year.

It's that it showed potential to be great and could have gotten there this year. 

I can't believe people cannot fathom it in their dense little heads that maybe, just maybe, running an offense he was comfortable in and having a capable defense to back him up, Denard might have improved this year and in turn, seen the offense take another step forward. 

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 4:06 PM | Would believe in the potential more if we had done anything agai (Score:1)
blue in dc
Joined: 01/23/2011
MGoPoints: 222

I don't see how people who have so much faith that the offense would have been better at scoring reconcile that with the Mississippi State game. At that point, Denard had a full year of experience under his belt and we had a ton of time to prepare, but still, we saw the same old same old - can't score against a decent defense.



Unless RR was better than Borgess at teaching Denard to throw downfield, I think we'd still be having problems scoring against good teams.

You can be blue and still be green

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:26 PM | Seriously? (Score:1)
MichNukeEng
MichNukeEng's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 912

 

Trying to convince Brian we didn't have the single greatest offense in the history of college football last year is futile.

Just like it apparently is futile for him to try to convince you that you're using a strawman to refute Brian. His position has always been that the offense was one of the best in the country at moving the ball forward (which all offenses are trying to do at all times), but scoring offense was plagued by turnovers, field position, field goal kicking, and untimely penalties. Of these, two variables are outside the offense's control, while turnovers are correlated to a first-year underclassman QB and penalties were mostly due to Lewan being a redshirt freshman (some receivers also had holding/PFs kill drives). Had the offense been able to mature for another year or two (and the defense/special teams not been putrid), scoring offense would also have been very high in the country.

But seeing as how those opposed to last year's offense will never believe Brian when he uses stats/advanced metrics to support his opinions, this is probably a waste of time too.

EDIT: beaten to it by Coastal Blue.

Michigan's offensive style requires more players that have greater interactions with the Higgs field.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:53 PM | field position and FG kicking (Score:1 Normal)
2plankr
Joined: 03/13/2009
MGoPoints: -456

field position and FG kicking are certainly influenced by the offense

Again, we are top 10 THIS YEAR in advanced metrics (so far)

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 3:24 PM | Missing the point (Score:2 Normal)
MichNukeEng
MichNukeEng's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 912

If the offense is good at moving the ball forward, that means field position would improve and FG kicking made easier because of the offense. Defense/special team contributions to field position and FG kicking are negative enough such that the offense can be good at moving the ball forward but less good at scoring points.

Also, not sure which advanced metrics you're referring to, but FEI for 2011 is highly influenced by last year's ratings until after this week. I just checked FEI, and so far offensive rankings aren't available for 2011. Until they are, their current ranking is irrelevant.

Michigan's offensive style requires more players that have greater interactions with the Higgs field.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 2:14 PM | SACK YARDS AAAAAAARGH (Score:3 Normal)
Jivas
Jivas's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 2373

You're seriously going to leave the sack yards in the net rushing totals and pretend like Denard averaged 2.3 yards per carry?  Back them out and he's over 5 YPC.

This is either (1) being dumb or (2) being intellectually dishonest.

Denard's 2010 was spent redefining what one man can do.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:52 PM | Rushing totals? (Score:3 Normal)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19220

According to ESPN box score:

Denard: 18 carries for 42 yds total, long of 15; take that long run out, and he ran 17 times for 27 yds, or 1.58 yds per carry.

Vincent Smith: 8 carries for 37 yds total, long of 26: take that long run out, and he ran 7 times for 11 yds, or 1.57 yds per carry.

On the other side of the ledger:

Edwin Baker: 26 carries for 167 yds total, long of 25; take that long run out, and he ran 25 times for 142 yds, or 5.68 yds per carry.

That's a meaningful difference.


  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:59 PM | Don ... doesn't Denard's numbers include sacks? (Score:2 Normal)
Indiana Blue
Indiana Blue's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 1521

Go Blue!

No place on earth I'd rather be on a football Saturday than Michigan Stadium !

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:06 PM | You can't do statistics like that (Score:2 Normal)
schnoxl
schnoxl's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 278

You can't pull out outliers on only one side, especially when the distributions are heavily skewed to have a lot of small runs and an occasional large run. Pulling out the long runs is cherrypicking and a meaningless way to analyze the statistics.

Also, you didn't remove Denard's sacks when calculating his rushing yardage. Without those he's at 5.4 YPC. You also have to remove Gardner's sacks when analyzing the team rushing performance.

I sometimes write at the Hoover Street Rag.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:33 PM | Hold it right there. Stop. (Score:1)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14310

Your avatar needs to be made into an MGoShirt.  Or has that been accomplished already?

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:41 PM | Not until Brian stops (Score:5 Normal)
schnoxl
schnoxl's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 278

Not until Brian stops inadvertently trolling my HSR posts by calling Community "a bad hour-long NBC drama."

I sometimes write at the Hoover Street Rag.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 5:56 PM | No, actually (Score:1)
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1054

Removing outliers that skew the distribution and distort evident patterns is standard statistical practice.  Actually, normalizing a distribution skewed by a single or small discrete number of outliers this is something you should learn in Stats 101.  

When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing. -Bo

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 7:31 PM | Stats 101 is where you assume (Score:3 Normal)
schnoxl
schnoxl's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 278

Stats 101 is where you assume everything is normally distributed and thus learn a lot of things that are wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong when applied to any other statisical distribution and almost every real world application. I hope you weren't insinuating I don't have a familiarity with Stats 101.

Removing only the big runs is deliberately distorting in this case because the distribution of yards per carry is not Gaussian and probably better estimated by an exponential or a power law. Big runs are not outliers caused by measurement noise: the measurement noise can be at most +/- 1 yard! They are predictable events that are part of a running back's entire performance. Taleb would call them the black swans.

If you're going to massage your data in order to prove your point, you need a better reason than "That's what they do in Stats 101." Smith's numbers are still not good compared to Baker's without any need to resorting to statistical trickeration. Robinson's numbers weren't up to his usual standards, but the math used to get this meaningless YPC stat is nonsense.

 

I sometimes write at the Hoover Street Rag.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 8:43 PM | Maybe you are (Score:-1 Flamebait)
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1054

But that was unclear from your false assertion that removing outliers is unacceptable.  It's a basic practice that should be well known to you IF you have studied statistics, even at the introductory level.  

If you run 

2, 3, 3, 2, 5, 3, 56, 3, 3, etc...then 56 is an outlier that skews the distribution.

 

 

When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing. -Bo

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 9:26 PM | OK, I'm willing to admit my (Score:2)
schnoxl
schnoxl's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 278

OK, I'm willing to admit my sentence was poorly constructed. I did not mean to imply that removing outliers is universally poor procedure. But since you're going to be an ass about it and accuse me of being an ignoramus, it's time for me pull my argument from authority card.

Confession time: I didn't take Stats 101 at Michigan. I took Stats 620, 621, and 625 at Michigan. Is that enough for you? Google my user name, then find and Google my real name. Look up the name of the workshop I helped run last month. Look up the numerous papers I have written on stochastic processes. Then keep on telling me I know nothing about statistics.

"If you run 2, 3, 3, 2, 5, 3, 56, 3, 3, etc...then 56 is an outlier that skews the distribution." Sure it skews the distribution, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's not important. Believe it or not, sometimes distributions are naturally skewed!!! That 56-yard run is the difference between Barry Sanders and Kevin Jones and that is really damn important when fairly evaluating running backs. You do not remove outliers blindly assuming a Gaussian distribution, which is what you do if you have taken Stats 101 and never actually considered the deeper reasons as to why you perform statistical procedures and when you should perform them.

Removing the longest run in order to make your statistical comparison is massaging your data and is the football equivalent of a baseball announcer saying "Brandon Inge is 3 for 11 against southpaws on day games on Thursdays." It's cherry-picking. The fact that it's OK in Stats 101 doesn't mean it applies here.

 

I sometimes write at the Hoover Street Rag.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 11:53 PM | Doesn't it depend on whay you're trying to understand? (Score:1)
blue in dc
Joined: 01/23/2011
MGoPoints: 222

If you run 9 times for 1 yard and 1 time for 91 yards, you average 10 yards a run. This is very different than running 10 times for 10 yards a pop. In the second case, you'd be an idiot not to keep running, in the first case, i'd rather remove the outlier and not assume I'd be getting 10 yards a pop. I haven't taken stats 600 so my thinking may be wrong.

You can be blue and still be green

  • Login or register to post comments
October 18th, 2011 at 7:01 AM | Summary statistics are dangerous. (Score:2)
schnoxl
schnoxl's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 278

They are different sure, but that's why you shouldn't assume taking the mean explains everything. You don't need to remove the outlier to understand why you'd rather have the second guy. My points are:

1) Don't remove outliers if they don't diminish your point. You don't need to remove outliers to show that Edwin Baker had a better day than Vincent Smith; and

2) Good procedure (which is different from commonly used procedure) is that you don't assume inconvenient data is an outlier. If it's an outlier, you explain why it doesn't belong. For example, in a data set I work with, we remove one subject as an outlier because the experimenter reported that he/she didn't obey the conditions under which the study was being conducted (he/she took some drug that wasn't allowed, I think). In that case, I've explain why it's not part of the distribution.  That 91-yard run is just as much part of the distribution as all the others, as football is a game of a lot of short plays and the occasional long play. I used Barry Sanders as my example because that's how I remember him: lots of runs of 0,1, or 2 yards, and then occassionally busting out a 15+ yard one. Sanders's 5 YPC for his career hides a distribution that I think was somewhat less than optimal for an RB.

That doesn't require high level stats knowledge. It just requires thinking about what sort of distribution you'd expect and want from YPC.

I sometimes write at the Hoover Street Rag.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 18th, 2011 at 2:19 PM | Apology: I DON'T think you're an ignoramus (Score:2 Insightful)
Eye of the Tiger
Eye of the Tiger's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1054

And shouldn't have implied that.  Given your experience in statistics and this last post, that's clearly not the case.  But this set me off:

"Pulling out the long runs is cherrypicking and a meaningless way to analyze the statistics."

I had a problem with the know-it-all/patronizing tone of that, while disagreeing with the statement.  I apologize if I went too far in my reaction though.  I shouldn't have said the thing about Stats 101, and should have just stated the opinion that it's fine given the circumstances of Denard's running.  With all the post-Sparty panic and return of the tiresome "CC" debate infecting the board, I guess I was feeling a little too prickly.  

So to get more serious about things, how would you analyze the data then?  I would pull the outliers if they do skew the distribution, as the other guys did, but first deduct the sack numbers (as I don't and never will understand why the NCAA pulls sack numbers out of rushing stats when they're pass plays).  If when removing the sack numbers, there's a high and low outlier, I'd remove both.  

 

When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing. -Bo

  • Login or register to post comments
October 18th, 2011 at 2:32 PM | Sorry if I sounded (Score:3 Insightful)
schnoxl
schnoxl's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 278

Sorry if I sounded patronizing. I think that removing the outliers requires a good justification and I just don't see it in this case. I think the numbers look pretty bad for Michigan even with the long runs included. Sacks don't count in my analysis because they're passing plays not running plays.

If I were to pull outliers, I'd pull the highest and lowest designed run for each player, just to be symmetric. In this case, I'd just say, looking at all the data says Vincent Smith had a bad day, and pulling out the high & low runs says he had a really bad day.

I got a little carried away. I was in full on XKCD "Something is wrong on the Internet" mode.

I sometimes write at the Hoover Street Rag.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 7:34 PM | Stats 101 is where you assume (Score:2)
schnoxl
schnoxl's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 278

Sorry, double post.

 

I sometimes write at the Hoover Street Rag.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:18 PM | Sack totals are counted in (Score:4 Normal)
LandonC
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 1998

Sack totals are counted in the rushing numbers.  He was sacked 4 times for a loss of 34 yards.   So Denard ran 14 times for 76 yards.  5.4 yards per carry.  

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:53 PM | Borges is inferior to even Mack Brown and is the real dinosaur (Score:0 Normal)
hfhmilkman
Joined: 04/15/2009
MGoPoints: 137

Bowden took a strugglinger QB in Charlie Ward and put him in the shotgun and he won a Heismen.  Mr ultra conservative took a head case in Troy Smith and put him in the shotgun and nearly won a NC.  Mack Brown, the most basest of lizard brains who could not out scheme a rock put Vincy Young in the shotgun and told him to adlib to a NC.

What does our Ocoordinator do?  He takes the most explosive spread QB in the nation and sticks him under center.  If you have a Indy Race Car, don't use it to haul dirt!!!!  If MSU and Oregon meet in the Rose Bowl is there any doubt in the obliteration?  At the college level unless you have an absolutely dominating defense because you can pick the best ten players every year to play at your school, the spread be it run or pass based is going to destroy the conventional under center teams.

Look at the NFL.  Name the teams that are destroying opposing offenses.  NO, GB, and NE all give spread looks at least 60% of the time.  How come half the NFL is reverting to the 3-4 when 15 years ago 95% of the league was 4-3? 

Al Borges is out of date.  I had an extreme amount of trepidation that Borges was going to blow it.  This is a team with the entire offense back.  Another 7-5 year is going to be an extreme set backwards since next year could be utter destruction.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:59 PM | Yeah because Oregon sure put (Score:3 Normal)
dcmaizeandblue
Joined: 04/01/2010
MGoPoints: 674

Yeah because Oregon sure put up boatloads of points against Auburn...  Any offense can be shut down with a good gameplan, you're going way beyond overreacting take a few breaths.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 2:16 PM | Auburn's offense (Score:3 Normal)
Jivas
Jivas's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 2373

Did you notice the offense Auburn used to win that game and to win the national championship?

Denard's 2010 was spent redefining what one man can do.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 18th, 2011 at 9:55 AM | Yup. (Score:-1 Offtopic)
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 300

A modified spread offense with far less reliance on the zone read play and a QB who was big enough to see over lineman and had/has an NFL caliber arm and accuracy to make ALL the throws, not just the HS level throws.

You coach the TEAM not a SCHEME.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 2:23 PM | Quit the freakin (Score:2 Normal)
RobSk
Joined: 03/01/2010
MGoPoints: 56

Dude, that's just absurd. 7-5 is not going to happen. Purdue, Iowa, Illinois, OSU, Nebraska.

They will beat Purdue. To predict that the team that was within 20 yards of tying the game on the road against the 2nd best team in the big 10 is going to go 0-4 against the other 4 teams is nonsensical. At this point, 1-3 is a pessimistic outlook there. I think they will go 2-2 in those games, and 3-2 overall in the remaining games, for a 9-3 season. That's a pretty damn good year (better than I predicted). 

While I agree with you (and Brian) that Borges didn't do the things he needed to do to adjust properly to the situation, I think that of the remaining teams, only OSU has a defense anywhere close to as talented as MSU. Further, to somewhat disagree with both Brian and yourself, I thought MSU played the right D and played to stop the run all day. We played to counter that instead of playing to our strength. While it didn't work, I'm not clear it was a mistake.

      Rob

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 3:28 PM | Nebraska (Score:1)
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1948

might not have the greatest defense but my bigger worry is our defense against their offense.  Nebraska will probably constantly attack UM's d'ends with their running game.  I could see this game being a shootout.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:56 PM | Typical Brian (Score:-1 Normal)
BILG
BILG's picture
Joined: 08/31/2008
MGoPoints: 473

Putting it on the play calling.  4th and 1 was a horrible call, agreed.  But them having 9 men in the box the entire game was a function of the weather and Denard's inability to throw a 10 yard out.  If you recall, the same thing happened last year with your beloved RR making the play calls in nice weather.  Every good defense shuts the gimmick offense down.

I know you would never dare entertain the idea that Denard isn't a Big Ten QB, but perhaps its time you analyze all of the past two years instead of finding the 10 plays from this past game that support your bad play calling claims.

Run Fitz?  Why.  They stacked the box.  Might as well run Denard and use the rb as a blocker.  An effective run game from a rb with 9 in the box is impossible, unless running behind Wisconsin's O-line against Huron High School.

Has Borges figured out the best way to utilize Denard...absolutely not.  But genius RR couldn't beat good Big Ten defenses with a pure spread option.  It's no the fault of Borges that we have no go to play on 3rd and 7 when the defense stacks the box and blitzes. It's the reality of having a qb that can't throw accurately.

BILG

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:15 PM | Honest question: (Score:2 Normal)
tubauberalles
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1034

Did we run many 10 yard outs to even test this theory?

 

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 2:37 PM | Answer (Score:1)
InterM
InterM's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1102

No.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:27 PM | Gimmick Offense (Score:1)
M
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 236

Good thing Auburn didn't run into a good defense last year to shut down their gimmick offense.

Better shut it down, kid.  Your ignorance is showing.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 18th, 2011 at 10:03 AM | Easy now, comparing Auburns (Score:1)
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 300

Easy now, comparing Auburns 2010 offense to anything RR ever ran is just a little bit disingenous dont you think??

Auburn's QB never even approached the # of rushing attempts that Pat White or Denard did.

Auburns QB could exploit a D using his downfield passing skills which forced defenses to respect the traditional "vertical" game. When this occur's it frees up the "horizontal" game and allows an athletic QB like Cam to take advantage with his legs.

Auburns QB was the size of a linebacker.

I wont accuse you of comparing apples to oranges, but definately apples to pears.

You coach the TEAM not a SCHEME.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:57 PM | I thought the team played (Score:5 Normal)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7967

I thought the team played hard but not good and I am cool with that, at this stage of the program against a good team, and MSU is a well coached, good team. I don't get the disconnect of calling this a 5 loss team and then having a caniption fit when the "fall" to 6-1. Falling to 6-1 in a game they came close to winning. Expectations: lower them.

If you are of the opinion that M would have been better served running the ball, you may be right, but I don't think anything was going to work with the lack of blocking going on out there. M's O-line needs to play better to give passing or running any chance of working

What I see are too many people with their feelings hurt because Michigan lost a football game and as usual, lashing out, in need of a scapegoat. As for me, I will be tuning in in a couple weeks looking forward to seeing M in action for the 8th time this season.

You only get 12 or 13 opportunities to watch M football a year, how about trying to enjoy at least one of the games? Ask not what Michigan football can do for you, ask what you can do for Michigan football.

Crying about playing Alabama and crying about playing a shitty schedule doesn't really add up. Just sounds like someone is having a temper tantrum and lashing out at the Evil AD because M lost a football game.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:02 PM | Ilargely agree.  I think (Score:2 Normal)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12591

Ilargely agree.  I think Brian's annoyance with the Alabama game is, as he noted, it is a money-grab and not a home-and-home game.  This team was going to be destroyed by a good Alabama team regardless of where it was played, but coupled with the Evil Pop, the multiple "throwback" jerseys, the lack of water on sweltering days, etc. is starting to show a pattern of a guy who wants to make money, not necessarily keep in line with the traditions of the program. 

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:06 PM | An excellent outlook (Score:2)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

We are only at the beginning of Michigan getting back to being Michigan. 

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 4:07 PM | Smartest thing in this thread (Score:0 Normal)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38863

I don't know why people even want to be fans when it makes them so miserable.  Yeah, losing sucks...but people have been miserable for 7 weeks, complaining about every win, too. And low and behold, I was right- we did lose a game, and people have something to be mad about.  Man, it was a good a productive use of time to make yourself sick over all those wins too...because the lost games aren't bad enough.

Some of it was bad playcalling, and adjustments, some bad play by players and positions groups, some that we were playing a pretty good team.  But certain things people will find a way to hate on either way.

The big 4th and inches play was outthinking themselves, sure. But if they had pounded with Fitz and it had gotten stuffed, you can bet we'd be hearing "MANBALL- just like Lloyd ARGH". And I can't even comprehend complaining that we were passing too much on first down, when this space has advocated passing more on non-passing downs to catch the other team off guard and make it easier on Denard. (Was throwing Devin in there to telegraph it a seeming abortion? I'd say yes, but I don't know what Denard's health and throwing situation is right now.)

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:58 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:1)
ryebreadboy
ryebreadboy's picture
Joined: 12/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1791

I just really want to stop talking about what happened. It just never gets any better. And correct me if I'm wrong, to win the Legends we now need Sparty to lose twice to in-division foes? Nebraska and Iowa? I know they'll ge crushed by Wisconsin, but doesn't division record trump overall record in determining division champion?

Denard has spent the offseason working really hard and smiling at people.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:11 PM | No (Score:3 Normal)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4163

Nope, overall conference record is used to determine the division winners.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 1:42 PM | Needs is right (Score:1)
msoccer10
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 1585

If we win out, we need MSU to lose twice, but that's it. If we assume MSU loses to Wisconsin, we need help from Nebraska and/or Iowa. I don't see them losing to NW, Indiana or Minnesota.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 2:07 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:1)
ryebreadboy
ryebreadboy's picture
Joined: 12/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1791

Oh perfect, thank you! That's actually a weight off my mind.

Denard has spent the offseason working really hard and smiling at people.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 17th, 2011 at 12:58 PM | Not to rag on Brian, but when (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12591

Not to rag on Brian, but when have we ever enjoyed a "honeymoon" with a coach here at UM?  Even with Carr, people were PO'ed about Moeller being a drunk and coming off some rough seasons.  Then Carr scuttled through a mediocre year before turning it around.  RR came under constant fire, and Hoke was only viewed as a savior by the media and people who hated RR and the fact the team lost. 

I wasn't blown away by Hoke calling for the fade against ND, for going for it on 4th-and-2, or anything else.  He's a youngish coach who isn't Carr, but he's not a 13-year-old playing Madden 2012 either.  I actually didn't care about punting that often because they were locking MSU deep in their end of the field and were making stops.  What killed me was the poor playcall on the late 4th down conversion and the insistence on (a) passing all the time, and (b) putting Devin in and out as often as he did.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.