Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (48)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 1 hour ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 1 day ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 2 days ago
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 2 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 799 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 730 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 713 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 686 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 489 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 16 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 12 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    28 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    143 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    28 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    41 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    67 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    29 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    56 replies
  • Rivals 250 notes
    59 replies
  • ESPN: Michigan BBall article featuring GRIII.
    6 replies
  • Arkansas QB Mitchell to NC State
    24 replies
  • Detroit Lions to start new bowl pitting Big Ten vs. ACC in 2014
    45 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • ESPN: Trey Burke Articles/Video/Fluff/Etc.
    13 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    83 replies
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    42 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 7
  • ››
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    10 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    18 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    123 replies
  • Lewan Makes Feldman's "Freak List"
    18 replies
  • NFL: Pro-Bowl Considers A Bounty System
    31 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    83 replies
  • Putting out the MGoBatsignal for.......the Michigan Stormtrooper!
    27 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    127 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    51 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    57 replies
  • OT - Brian Urlacher retires
    35 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    46 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    143 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    29 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    77 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    143 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    127 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    123 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    83 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    2 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Live Blog Chaos Mitigation Post

By Brian — September 13th, 2008 at 11:31 AM — 40 comments

Take everything that follows under that context and realize these are solely our observations from moderating the live chat during the game and our goal is to make the chats better for everyone going forward.

GENERAL COMMENTS

1. This isn't as easy as it seems. We are putting lots of effort into making this an enjoyable experience for everyone, and sacrificing a bit of our own enjoyment of the game to do so. All we ask in return is the benefit of the doubt in that our actions are well-intentioned.

2. The number one complaint so far is "why aren't my posts being published?" There are 3 possible reasons for this.

First, we just didn't see it. This is highly likely if your comment is right after a big play.

Second, your comment is the same thing 5 other people said at the same time. In this case, we prefer to choose the clearest version of the comment.

Third, your post was neither witty, insightful, relevant, nor original (see next topic). Brandon Minor RAGES, we get it, everyone gets it.

Submitting "MINOR RAGE" clutters our view and limits what we can post. If someone makes a tackle or a pick, typing their name, "Graham!" is the same thing.

A list of common one-liners that destroy continuity:
Minor Rage
Death Roh
Yeah!
<name of person involved in play>!
WTF?
Shoelace!

Those kill us. It kills the live blog. Please refrain.

Also, please please PLEASE do not submit a "why aren't my comments showing up?" comment. There is a well-intentioned reason, it's not a technical glitch, and all you're doing with this type of comment is adding to the clog that the moderators have to deal with and making it more likely somebody else's comment will get missed. Don't do this, or Big Gay Heart will come to your house and murder your puppies.

We aren't looking to accept paragraphs of technical analysis. One word posts aren't acceptable.

3. Technical problems crop up from time to time. Moderator computer crashes, stream violations, cil software freezing, all of these happen. Please be patient.

4. How to make your post better? The best thing you can do to make it easier on us and to increase the chances your post stands out is to make it look like you expended a small amount of effort. "stveie brown suckS1!!" will never be chosen over "Stevie Brown sucks." We realize it's a chat, but when 50 people are submitting comments and only 1 person is approving them, little things like that are used in order to reduce the need to read each comment in its entirety. We only see the first 10 words or so of the comment in the queue LiveBlog provides, and in order to keep the chat moving we can't really click and open each comment. LiveBlog software doesn't automatically scroll to the most recent comment. So when we click "accept", we're stuck there and have to catch up to more current action. That means we scroll all the way (sometimes quickly) to the here and now. Which means we skip over things. It's the way things are.

If your comments are "cleaner" it helps keep things orderly and on topic. During commercial breaks and halftime, this is definitely relaxed as there aren't as many comments to filter. Typical exclamations like "woo!" and "yes!" and "nice job!" are almost automatically glanced over, and approved only if the moderator is bored. Start your comment as if you're starting a sentence, and the moderator will assume your comment is worth reading.

5. Are we censoring comments? Definitely not. There were several viewpoints we disagreed with that we allowed through, and that will continue. Period.

SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS

1. Please keep the doom and gloom comments to a minimum, especially when we are winning the game. We're just as big a bunch of fans as you are, but piling on and bitching when we all know this is going to be a rough season really makes it less enjoyable for everyone. There were hundreds of comments ignored for this reason. Sarcastic, self-deprecating, and/or just plain funny doom and gloom, on the other hand, is encouraged (e.g. "my life is a rudderless, meaningless mess unless Stevie Brown screws up multiple times every Saturday")

2. Playcalling. The coaching staff only knows how the players performed in practice, and now in 2 live games. This is the information they have to make play calls. We guarantee you they aren't saying "Hey, this never worked in practice might as well try it now!" As a result, let's try to keep the bitching about playcalling to a minimum until we know a bit more about the team. Our biggest pet peeve is second-guessing play calls, but only after they go wrong. Second-guessing ahead of time, conversely, is somewhat allowed- as moderators it's a little annoying to click through everyone's "suggestions" for RichRod, but on the other hand it might spark good discussion and it's probably not negative, so we'll try our best to put it through. Bottom line: if you're in the mood to offer suggestions, then by all means give it a try but only before the play begins.

3. If you want to comment on the QBs, you had better make it insightful and/or positive. The moderators will be in no mood to approve "dammit Threet/Sheridan why couldn't you hit that?" comments.

4. Streams. We try to find the most reliable streams and put them into the static box. Understand that once it's game time, we may not have be researching active streams. In the event of a stream outage, we will ask the audience for help. We thank you guys for replying with streams you are using. Also be aware that stream technical problems might be addressed, but after the first few explanations (ie www.xyz.com's streaming software isn't compatible with Mac), we will ignore peoples' requests for tech support.

FINAL THOUGHTS

Things will get better. We ask for patience, we want to improve the liveblogging experience. Constructive criticism is fine. Second-guessing and bitching is reserved for Notre Dame and Penn State fans (and Mike Debord). Thank you and Go Blue!


  
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
September 13th, 2008 at 12:28 PM | eff it' auto approve everyone (Score:1)
ttifiblog
ttifiblog's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2703

let chaos reign.  Chaos, it's what the internet is for.  (well, that and porn)

http://ttifi.blogspot.com/ for interesting vids

http://ttifiblog.tumblr.com/ for interesting pics

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 1:07 PM | We can't. There's a limit... (Score:1)
cfaller96
cfaller96's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1327

We can't auto-approve everybody, the software has a limit on that number.

The Wolverine Liberation Army- saving Michigan fans one dick joke at a time.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 1:06 PM | Yikes (Score:1)
GCS
GCS's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 777

Relax, guys. Most of us don't let our self-esteem be determined by the amount of posts a bunch of people we've never met approve of.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 1:30 PM | Check our email (Score:1)
dex
dex's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1883

Maybe most don't have a problem, but there is quite the vocal minority out there with a real issue about not having their opinions approved and posted.

great and omniscient Grand Poobah of the WLA

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 1:43 PM | Since I don't know how the moderation system works... (Score:1)
GCS
GCS's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 777

Is there a way to ban IP's for posting "why aren't my messages showing up" too much, so you don't have to wade through their mess any more?

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 1:40 PM | if everyone was auto approved (Score:1)
gater
gater's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3999

if everyone was auto approved this wouldn't be a live blog, it would be an AOL chatroom. age, sex, location anyone?

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 1:56 PM | yea but...... (Score:1)
maizerulz
maizerulz's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 0

i understand everything said.....but really.....stevie brown does suck

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 2:20 PM | Yeah, but he is OUR sucky safety (Score:1)
Other Chris
Other Chris's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1204

So we'll just have to embrace him until he gets better or gets replaced.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 13th, 2008 at 2:28 PM | Would it be possible to save (Score:1)
Farnn
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2346

Would it be possible to save some of the dumb comments not approved and post them later?  Could more for some good laughs.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 14th, 2008 at 3:43 AM | Ruining the experience (Score:1)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

When I come to mgoblog to chat about the game I don't come to solely read ninjafootball or cfaller's comments on the game. I come to partcipate in the discussion and the approval of one comment in ten if I am lucky takes away from the experience. This occurs during the game despite the fact that I don't make comments such as, "Stevie Brown sucks." Also, why should I put great thought in a comment if only one in ten will be approved? I recommend going back to the old halo format as you may have 10-15 comments saying, "TD" or "Taco pants just caught another," but everyone gets heard.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 14th, 2008 at 8:56 AM | Time for a lesson (Score:1 Flamebait)
dex
dex's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1883

Despite what the schools and your parents teach you, not everyone is a special little snowflake.

Letting everyone be heard is pointless. There were over a 1000 of you. Nobody would have been able to follow the discussion or participate meaningfully, it would just be a lot of noise.

 

But then again, it's not that you want to talk, is it? It's that you want people to see what you have to say. You don't have any interest in a real discussion.  

great and omniscient Grand Poobah of the WLA

  • Login or register to post comments
September 14th, 2008 at 9:18 AM | Ugh (Score:1)
Blue Durham
Blue Durham's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 985

I recommend going back to the old halo format as you may have 10-15 comments saying, "TD" or "Taco pants just caught another," but everyone gets heard

That is interesting for about 10 seconds.  That is why I for one think this format (both live chat and MGoBlog's new format) is far superior. 

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 2:15 AM | The moderators had a lot to (Score:1)
mjv
mjv's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 364

The moderators had a lot to deal with during the game.  do the math, with over 1,000 people online, if each one makes only one comment every five minutes, that generates 200 comments per minute to go through.  I wouldn't want to completely sacrifice my ability to watch the game in order to moderate the discussion.  Many thanks to the moderators for their service.

Even with the moderated chat, it was challenging reading all of the posts and watching the game closely enough.  

Is the format pefect?  No.  But I'm not sure that there is a better method.

A question to the moderators:   How many of the posts are bulk blasts of "Taco Pants" or "Stevie Brown this or that?" or "that call sucks!!"?  If these bulk posts represent a large portion of the comments, would there be a way to put some buttons on the page that allowed the audience to push a button for "Tacopants" and have everyone see how many people are "voting" tacopants during the last 60 seconds?  This may offload a large burden and give the audience some idea of the number of people with a certain take on a given play.

Just an idea.  Take it for what its worth -- not much.

Go Blue!! Viva La Revolucion!!
www.wolverineliberationarmy.com

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 12:15 PM | You have given the (Score:2 Normal)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

very reasons why in the end everyone will angered by the format. If there were a 1,000 people online and they made comments how could you or 100 moderators for that matter happen to select my nice comment out of lets say 100 posts made? You have also stated that you are unwilling to give up watching the game yourself which further cripples your ability to find the good posts to select. Not to mention the moderators making comments themselves. In fact, you will notice that the moderators make just as many comments as those who are not. All this means is if you have a limited amount of moderators making as many comments as those 1,000 chatters then you have many ticked off people.

The format is just not perfect; its not even a good method when I or others make several comments and only having one (if we are lucky) approved. I, finally, and I am sure I am not alone, gave up posting.

My questions: Do you want to make this an enjoyable experience for everyone or only a select few? What reasons were used from going away from the halo format last year to this new format that must be moderated? Someone mentioned a chat room; what is wrong with having a chat room for partcipated discussion during the game?

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 12:29 PM | Coherent conversation (Score:1)
GCS
GCS's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 777

There are 1000 people trying to post. Of those, only about 10-20 are actually trying to have a conversation with each other, responding to previous statements, etc. The rest are just trying to post their own stream of consciousness. The Scout and Rivals boards are much better places to put those comments.

If you were actually trying to put in something useful, I think they've mentioned how many messages are coming in every minute. Things will get lost when you have to go through that many. It happens. If they just auto-approved everything, nobody would be able to read a message before the next one popped up. It would be chaos.

Seriously, why do people get so upset over this? What grievous harm have they inflicted on you by not approving your message? The fact that people spend so much time saying "Post my message!" astounds me.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 1:41 PM | Because most people want to (Score:2 Normal)
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2505

Because most people want to be a special snowflake, so they think the moderators aren't recognizing their special snowflakeness by not approving their posts.  A moderated chat with 1000 posters brings the hard reality that your snowflake isn't that special, and some people don't want to accept that and blame others.

HOWEVA, if you go in hoping for some good jokes, gsimms giving insight to what is really going on, some fellow fans sharing the joy and pain, and the realization that only 1/3 of your posts are getting approved because the other 2/3 are either repetitive or crap, it's pretty nice.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 2:39 PM | A special snowflake??? (Score:2 Normal)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

I am sure most posters just care about talking about the game and couldn't give a crap about being a, "special snowflake." Apparently those who decide to post, "Fumble, DRINK," represents a special snowflake as those comments were numerous.

I, personally, would rather read ten posts that say TD so that the informative comments will be posted then none of them making it or an extremely rare informative comment make it. Actually, lets face it, 90-95% percent of the comments made including that of the moderators are uninformative but made for interactive purposes.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:14 PM | Apparently quite a few (Score:3 Normal)
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2505

Apparently quite a few people do care about being a special snowflake, given the number of "My posts aren't being approved, mods suck, I quit!" posts that are in every live chat.  Yes, some of the posts that do get approved aren't particularly special, but an unmoderated chat would be overloaded with unspecial comments.

The people complaining about lack of approval aren't trying to make the chat better for everyone.  They just want to make the chat better for themselves by having everyone else see how insightful or funny they are.  The problem is that they aren't that insightful or funny, otherwise they would be getting approved.  But it's easier to blame the moderators for stifling their incredible wit than to make better posts.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:17 PM | If the moderators (Score:1)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

get a number of posts that state, "My posts aren't being approved, mods suck, I quit!" Then that should tell you that hey, "maybe, this new format isn't the best." The resolution should not be, "well, those people who's post are getting approved just think they are something special." Once again, people don't come here because they think they are something special (At least, I don't), they come because: 1) They enjoy Michigan Football and 2) They want to interact with other fans during the game. I am sure people who complain about lack of approval don't immediately come on here and start complaining. They could be like me posting numerous comments (not Stevie Brown sucks, etc) and only seeing one or none.

Having moderators who are limited in their ability (and numbers) against the sheer volume of non-mods will eventually tick everyone off including the "special snokflakes."  I am not even sure if I saw your name during the game as a mod wile_e8.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:23 PM | Uh huh (Score:1)
dex
dex's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1883

wile_08 isn't a mod. that's my point. a lot of people do enjoy the new format.

 

for the record, we posted pretty much every single "why aren't I approved" comment, simply to use the opportunity to explain in case anyone else was wondering. if you want to go through and check how many that was you can - but i'll tell you it was less than 15. out of 7000 comments and 2000 unique views. So, apparently 1,985 people didn't care enough to complain - it was you and a couple others that kept doing it. 

great and omniscient Grand Poobah of the WLA

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:42 PM | In the end (Score:1)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

there is little value in complaining during the game as you realize that most posts are not going to be registered anyway. I am sure you had far more complaints the first game. I personally only complained once each time during every game and realized it was pointless.

A poll on the website would actually provide a more accurate showing as to those who approve/disapprove of the new format.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:50 PM | So, tell us, what did you have to say that was so important? (Score:1)
Other Chris
Other Chris's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1204

I see you just registered on this site on Sunday, so it's not like you have had much to say about Michigan football in the past that you couldn't wait to sign up for MGoBoard (unlike some of us with an Internet addiction).

Few of my comments got through Saturday, IIRC.  Maybe one did.  Am I bitching?  No.  My heart wasn't in it, for one thing, and I got almost all of my comments through the previous week (more verve in my posting, I suspect) so it all evens out.  Make Plays! and your comments will make it through.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 4:16 PM | No, it won't tick off (Score:3 Normal)
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2505

No, it won't tick off everyone, only the people who incorrectly believe their crap would be a worthwhile contribution to the chat.  Appeasing these people in order cut down on the approval complaints would just lead to too many posts to read while following the game and a poorer experience for everyone else.  You may be a sad panda because only one or none of your numerous posts make it through, but everyone else is happy that there aren't too many posts to read in between plays.

And no, I'm not a mod.  Just an occasional poster who gets approved about 1/3 of the time (which is where I came up with that in my original post).

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 10:23 AM | mjvancam, IMO, having (Score:1 Normal)
chitownblue (not verified)

mjvancam,

IMO, having moderated Utah, and moderating in fits and starts on Saturday, "Stevie Brown sux" are extremely frequent. However, the thing that makes it the hardest are posts that have no joke/opinion/observation, but are just "woo hoo!" or "nice run!" or "fuck!". These posts almost never, ever, get through, but they flood the comment queue - which makes it hard to see everyone else's.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 10:25 AM | The best way, IMO, to get a (Score:0)
chitownblue (not verified)

The best way, IMO, to get a comment through is to write in intelligble english and be funny.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 12:36 PM | I'm not sure, sdogg1m, if you (Score:0)
chitownblue (not verified)

I'm not sure, sdogg1m, if you were in the live chat this weekend or not. The scroll window was going extremely fast - to the point that each comment was in view for roughly 45 to 50 seconds. That was with moderators approcing around 40% to 50% of them. Approving EVERYTHING would have things move fast that no one, literally, could read it.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 2:29 PM | Then that (Score:1)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

is absolutely a format that will not work. I am not blaming anyone and I appreciate the moderators doing the best they can when they are clearly outnumbered. My point is that if only a tiny number of posts from each poster gets approved then that will breed frustration. At some point people will migrate to other places where they are able to partcipate. I don't want to see that happen. I like having the Wolverine faithful coming to one spot on the web and chatting up the game.

A couple of ideas: A chat format for the game! I really don't mind forum posting knowing that even though my posts are buried swiftly that at least I get to make a comment.

I will continue to provide ideas as I think of them or stumble across them on the internet.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:14 PM | An idea (Score:1)
dex
dex's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1883

if you want a chat room - start a chat room.

There is obviously a massive, much larger than you, silent majority who seems to enjoy the format as it is currently. 

great and omniscient Grand Poobah of the WLA

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:22 PM | Dex (Score:1)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

If they are silent then how can you automatically assume they enjoy the format?

I am giving the site recommendations to improve the format. If I wanted to start a chat room myself then I would have started one already.

My purpose is not to invoke hostility but to 1) Bring up issues with the new format. 2) Make suggestions on improving it.

Obviously, I am not the only one who has problems or Brian wouldn't have felt the need to make this post so apparently your massive, much larger, than me conclusion could be wrong.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 3:56 PM | Learn, son (Score:1)
Maize4Blue
Maize4Blue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 280

You may not recognize me, but I am a silent partner in the WLA. I've moderated on all 3 games so far and have seen and heard everything. People will complain (as with anything), but there is a large amount of people who have thoroughly enjoyed the experience. Haloscan or a chat would be a nightmare. Brian has decided to go with the Cover It Live software for everyone's benefit. He can put a few trusting individuals in charge of his site and not have to worry about massive chaos. I don't think he's too concerned with a few people not liking the "new" format. It's a learning experience for everyone, you, me, everyone that stops by on game day.

I can say that during the ND game, I noticed a few commenters that were contributing to the community. They were instantly auto-approved by me. I don't think you're getting the main issues the WLA deals with:

1) We are new at this, give us a break
2) We honestly appriove any good/useful/funny comment
3) Contribute to the community or just watch
4) There will be bumps along the way
5) We are all Michigan fans and enjoy watching the game, plus interacting on MGoBlog
6) There will be dick jokes
7) Brian's sticking to this format
8) There is no #8
9) We're fully capable of keeping up with the comments
10) Stop arguing

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 4:52 PM | So no chance (Score:1)
sdogg1m
sdogg1m's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 269

that any recommendations for a different format will work?

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 4:57 PM | http://mgoblog.com/content/i (Score:1)
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2505

http://mgoblog.com/content/irc-channel

And the unmoderated chat might actually work nicely as long as there are only 10-20 people on there at a time.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 15th, 2008 at 12:40 PM | Is a Mad Money style array (Score:1)
mjv
mjv's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 364

Is a Mad Money style array of buttons that would include "F---", "woo hoo", "Tacopants", etc that would allow people to express the emotion of the moment and have a tally displayed be possible?  It sounds like that would likely cut back on the absolute number of comments and free up the forum for more conversation.  As well as free up the moderators' band width.

Again, my comment is more of a brainstorm than well hashed out idea.  take it for what its worth.

Go Blue!! Viva La Revolucion!!
www.wolverineliberationarmy.com

  • Login or register to post comments
September 16th, 2008 at 9:51 AM | DON'T BUY! DON'T BUY! (Score:1)
colin
colin's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1332

i like this idea, though i don't know if it's conceivable outside of a poll or something?  not exactly what you're looking for.

 

but seriously, who is this guy and his complaints and such?

...the Canadians make up for it with their emotion and classic ice-dancing skill.

  • Login or register to post comments
September 16th, 2008 at 2:41 PM | I think Steve Szabo was right (Score:1)
ts
ts's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 20

I think Steve Szabo was right when he said "Anyone who needs a keyboard to watch a football game is a communist." I hope you all die in a fire.

http://mgovideo.com | email

  • Login or register to post comments
October 10th, 2009 at 3:30 PM | I am in Shanghai, China on a (Score:1)
BigTGoBlue
Joined: 10/10/2009
MGoPoints: 2

I am in Shanghai, China on a business trip, and reallly want to see this game, especially since we may be wearing white pants!

Can someone please reply to this thread with a way to stream live video of the game? I would greatly appreciate it! Let's go blue!!!

UM CoE Commencement Speaker, 2007

  • Login or register to post comments
November 13th, 2010 at 2:00 PM | Tate? (Score:1)
CAwolverine
CAwolverine's picture
Joined: 01/18/2010
MGoPoints: 270

Anyone else want to see Tate get a series? Also how about leading with the passing game. It is wide open. The running game is not there right now.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 13th, 2010 at 6:14 PM | Now I feel really bad. (Score:1)
kevin holt
kevin holt's picture
Joined: 03/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2817

I'm usually not part of the liveblog, as I am either at the game or watching on tv, but today I was in the library watching on a stream, so I was on here.

I knew that comments were being approved by mods, but I had a long period where nothing was showing up. I was submitting seemingly relevant comments and even posted a stream that I found when others were asking about ones that weren't skipping. I thought maybe it was a glitch, I had no idea not to make a huge deal about it and to maybe make more acceptable and clear cut comments. And I especially feel bad for submitting "Why are my comments not being approved? I thought everything I've said has been relevant, unless it's technical problems" or something along those lines. I should've just shut up.

Mike Martin told me he loves me. My life is quite possibly complete.

Join the bone marrow donor registry today: www.dkmsamericas.org (do it.)

  • Login or register to post comments
September 1st, 2012 at 7:53 PM | I Did Not Think (Score:1)
OldBlueMan
OldBlueMan's picture
Joined: 06/06/2011
MGoPoints: 198

That Stevie Brown sucked.

 

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
January 1st, 2013 at 2:01 PM | Thank god no Spielman (Score:1)
Norcal Trublue
Norcal Trublue's picture
Joined: 10/14/2011
MGoPoints: 20

Thank god no Spielman

There can only be one! Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.