Life on the Margins: Michigan v. Iowa Comment Count

Tim

stonumdrop.png

Based on Dr. Saturday's sadly extinct "Life on the Margins" series, this post breaks down the Michigan-Iowa game past the score and total yardage.

Michigan v. Iowa
Category Iowa Michigan
Total Yards 383 522
First Downs 21 29
Yards Per Play 6.38 6.07
Yards Per Possession 29.46 43.50
Average Start Own 34 Own 23
Turnovers 0 4
Penalties Against 3-36 8-66
Yards For Points 405 296
"Wasted" Yards 32 196
Final Score 38 28
Yards for Points and Wasted Yards include penalties; Michigan's 'assistance' to Iowa makes their scoring drives longer than their total yardage.

By total yardage and average drive performance, Michigan should have won this game, possibly comfortably. Without their starting quarterback for most of the second half, the Wolverines outgained Iowa by nearly 150 yards. However, it was the Michigan mistakes [ed: (tm)?] that killed the team.

Turnovers

On top of four turnovers - two by Tate Forcier, one each by Denard Robinson and Vincent Smith - the Wolverines also had a 38-yard field goal blocked and returned into positive territory for the Hawkeyes. That's a five-possession swing, more than enough to compensate for a two-score loss by the Wolverines.

Michigan's turnovers occurred at inopportune times as well. Vincent Smith fumbled in the redzone with the Wolverines down 14 points, and Tate Forcier offered up an interception around midfield on the following drive.

Those Damn Penalties

Drive-killing penalties (on themselves) or drive-extending penalties (graciously extended to the Hawkeyes) also played a major role. Though Iowa took a few penalties as well, Michigan's errors had a greater impact on the game:

  • A facemask on the opening kick return of the game gives Iowa the ball in good field position at their own 38. Thanks to a Hawkeye penalty (see above), the drive stalls. IMPACT: minimal field position swing.
  • The Wolverines had a 2nd and 3 until a Taylor Lewan personal foul pushed Michigan back 13 yards. Second and 16 led to a three-and-out. IMPACT: Loss of drive.
  • JT Floyd breaks up an Iowa pass in the redzone, but interferes with Allen Reisner on the play. The play only nets the Hawkeyes two yards and a free down. They go on to score a touchdown on the drive (after Jordan Kovacs can't reel in an interception two plays later). IMPACT: four points for Iowa since they would have been kicking on fourth and ten without the unnecessary hold around the waist.
  • Michigan has a 3rd and 5 at midfield, but a Stephen Schilling false start pushes it back to 3rd and 10. Michigan is forced to pass, and Denard Robinson throws an interception on the next play. IMPACT: partially responsible for turnover.
  • Michigan is threatening with a 1st-and-10 on Iowa's 15. A false start penalty leads to three straight plays for loss or no gain, and Seth Broekhuizen's 38-yard field goal attempt is blocked. IMPACT: significant. Most likely three points, maybe more.
  • After an Iowa score, Jeremy Gallon returns the ball to the 25. A block in the back brings it to the seven. Michigan is able to move the ball on the drive, but eventually punts to close out the half. IMPACT: 50/50 loss of TD. With the additional 19 yards Michigan would have been at the Iowa 25 and would have had an opportunity to go for it on fourth and one.
  • With Michigan in serious catch-up mode down 21 in the third quarter, a false start penalty on their first play of a drive doesn't prevent them from scoring a touchdown. It does take a little more time off the clock. IMPACT: minimal.
  • On the ensuing drive, JT Floyd pulls Adam Robinson down at the Michigan 40-yard line... by the facemask. The Hawkeyes are able to punch it in from the 25 in three plays, pushing their lead back to three scores. IMPACT: aided Hawkeye TD drive considerably.
  • Michigan kicks the ball out of bounds TWICE in the fourth quarter, giving the Hawkeyes the ball on their own 40-yard line. The Hawkeyes score on both ensuing drives (one touchdown, one field goal). IMPACT: argh.

Volume and timing of penalties conspired to doom Michigan on the day. Maybe a really good team can overcome those errors, but...

But What Does It All Mean?

Like Rich Rodriguez has been saying for the better part of three years, this team isn't good enough to play poorly and win. If "playing poorly" can include running up over 500 yards of offense, it should be happy times in Ann Arbor when they do finally play well. What's exciting is that we've seen that earlier this year, when Michigan had zero turnovers against UConn and Notre Dame.

So, can a bye week cure all the ills that plague Michigan? Probably not. But it can cure some. The coaches did an excellent job preaching discipline in fall camp, and the Wolverines committed very few turnovers and penalties to start the year. If they can drill that again in this two-week period, improvement is sure to follow.

Couple that with the healthy return of the team's best quarterback (and I don't mean to bag on Forcier, because he was mostly good, but the team's backup quarterback was responsible for 2 turnovers), running back, offensive lineman, and defensive lineman, and the future is maybe not as bleak as it seemed after Saturday's game.

[Ed: This shouldn't be construed as a "Michigan deserved to win" post. Errors are errors, and Michigan's were severe. The field position difference is enormous: 11 yards over 11 drives is 121 yards, or almost all of Michigan's yardage advantage.

We should distinguish between talent breakdowns like Denard bombing away to Tyler Sash and plain stupid crap like Lewan's PF and the false starts or the kicker putting two(!) kickoffs out of bounds. The former's more likely to recur than the latter, and Michigan made a number of their mistakes because they were forced into them in ways that Michigan's defense could not replicate. Some of the extra mistakes are a real trend... but how many?

The next three weeks will tell.]

Comments

Bosch

October 20th, 2010 at 5:33 PM ^

I couldn't disagree more with your conclusion that this play had minimal impact on the game.

Michigan is threatening with a 1st-and-10 on Iowa's 15. A false start penalty leads to three straight plays for loss or no gain, and Seth Broekhuizen's 38-yard field goal attempt is blocked.

ciszew

October 20th, 2010 at 5:31 PM ^

...when I team continually plays "poorly," i.e. makes these kind of mistakes on a continual basis in conference play, is there something more to it? 

Youth, inexperience, size, lack of dicispline all add in making mistakes.  My concern going forward is that it won't stop.  In these next 5 games and specifically in the last 2 games what I would love to see, even if the score doesn't end up in our favor, is a really well played football game by a Rich Rodriguez Michgan team.  It feels like under his regime Michigan is suffering from a "if only" syndrome.  If only this happened, or this happened, then we would win.  What would make me feel better going into the future is a solid in conference game for 4 quarters, again win or lose, that the team plays sound, fundelmental football.  I hope it happens.   

JFW

October 20th, 2010 at 5:54 PM ^

" It feels like under his regime Michigan is suffering from a "if only" syndrome.  If only this happened, or this happened, then we would win.  What would make me feel better going into the future is a solid in conference game for 4 quarters, again win or lose, that the team plays sound, fundelmental football.  I hope it happens. "

 

Which has the Wolverines depressingly sounding like the Lions. I'm not happy right now. 

TennBlue

October 20th, 2010 at 6:01 PM ^

that is loaded with juniors and seniors who have the experience to know better, I'll get concerned. 

I'm acceding to reality that these guys just have to learn how to deal with pressure and not make unforced errors.  If we're still doing these things at this rate next year, I'll get out my torch and pitchfork.

zlionsfan

October 21st, 2010 at 12:59 AM ^

Right now, at this very minute, Michigan is good enough to beat about half of all I-A teams and possibly some of the rest (Notre Dame may actually belong in the top half). A reasonable estimate has Michigan finishing 7-5 plus a bowl.

Right now, Detroit is good enough to beat St. Louis. A reasonable estimate has Detroit finishing 5-11.

Michigan is in the middle of a transition from Carr to Rodriguez; there has been some loss of talent, but it is difficult to say how much can be attributed to the coach(es). They have had records that are significantly worse than many in school history, but at no time could they even be considered the worst in the conference, much less AQ schools or all of I-A.

Detroit is recovering from nearly eight years of being run by an incompetent fool who can reasonably be considered one of the worst general managers in the history of North American sports. In that time, they were regularly one of the worst teams in the NFL, posting the first 0-16 record in NFL history ... and looking at everything from two-season runs to eight-season runs (giving Millen blame for the entire 2008 season), the Lions under Millen posted at least one run that ranked among the worst 3% of comparable stretches in NFL history. His eight-year record of 31-97, .242, is the ninth worst in NFL history. The eight eight-year stretches worse than that belong to two franchises, the Cardinals and Eagles, and both date back to WWII-era football: the Eagles' runs overlap from 1933-40 to 1936-43, and the Cardiinals' runs from 1936-43 to 1939-46.

During the same period, the worst eight-year run of any other team that overlapped with any part of Millen's tenure was the Raiders from 2002-09, .313 (67th-worst). The Raiders also had the second-worst record during Millen's tenure, 45-83 (.352, 151st). Yes, Millen managed to post a record that was almost a full season's worth of losses worse than every other franchise in the NFL.

Of course, this directly followed a period where the Lions made the playoffs six times in nine seasons, narrowly missing out on a seventh trip in 2000 when Paul Edinger's field goal broke a tie and knocked the Lions out of the final wild-card spot.

Yes, what Michigan football is going through right now is painful for any fan, whether or not you're old enough to remember the days when a Big Ten title was completely out of the question (for the record, I'm not that old myself). And there are some similarities between the resurgence at Michigan and the resurgence at Ford Field - yes, the Lions are greatly improved on the defensive line and on offense this year, no, the secondary isn't any better, and yes, it'll take at least another year for them to be decent.

But comparing it to Detroit Lions football is wildly inaccurate, even for hyperbole. Rodriguez would have to post 0-12 seasons like MSU players post bail to approach Millen's swath of destruction, and even then, Brandon, unlike the Fords, would never allow it to reach anywhere near the depths that Millen dug. Rodriguez is struggling a bit, but apparently has the ship heading in the right direction. Millen created disaster on a scale that hadn't been seen in the NFL by any franchise in more than 60 years.

Blue in Seattle

October 21st, 2010 at 7:02 PM ^

It is becoming very boring to read a great analytical diary post, only to see someone throw out the comment, "and the coaches aren't doing their job I'm upset"

This comparison is horrible for the reasons you state and more.  I just wish more readers of this blog realized the work that goes into this analysis.  And that this analysis is the closest thing we have to sitting in the film review meetings that go on with the real team.  It's as if everyone thinks the players and coaches weren't trying to win the game and are apathetic about it.

But wishing people could provide value versus venting on a blog board is a hopeless task.

ty@thelionsinwinter

October 21st, 2010 at 10:18 AM ^

I agree wholeheartedly with the editorial asides, and it's because I've been saying the same thing at my Lions blog.  Saying "Well if Denard just doesn't throw any interceptions, we win" isn't productive--just as the "Well if the Lions just don't commit 15 penalties a game, we win" piece every Lions blogger's been writing for weeks isn't productive either.

There's a difference between coachable mental mistakes, like Cliff Avril's late hit on Eli Manning, and talent issues, like "oh no I'm getting burned so I'd better grab this guy's jersey and pray."

Peace
Ty

Bodogblog

October 20th, 2010 at 9:45 PM ^

in fact, +1 because I'm sick of hearing myself in the same excuse dialogue. 

But knowing the details, actually reviewing the game, I'm seeing a bulk of the players on Offense beating their man or making their play.  Lewan IS doing well, as is Omameh, as is Schilling, Molk, and Dorrestien's been solid.  TE's are trucking people.  WR's are making plays and blocking well.  RB's haven't yet joined the star party

In the losses, it really does seem like a single player's bad pass, penalty, decision or turnover is killing an offensive win.  The Smith fumble: Schilling stands up his man and moves to the LB, leaving the beaten DT for the TE under the assumption he'll smash him (this has to be part of the blocking scheme)... he doesn't.  The TE runs right by.  Mistake.  If that doesn't happen Vincent has an easy 5+ yards instead of a turnover. See 1:56 of this video

I hope I'm not being Pollyanna.  I don't think I am

EDIT: Schilling may not have intentionally left the DT for the TE, but regardless it's a mistake for Moore to run by an unblocked man.  If he picks him up, everyone's blocked.  And start the video at 1:48 for a nice bonus Hopkins run

ciszew

October 20th, 2010 at 10:53 PM ^

...God that sucks to watch.  It is totally on Kevin Koger who didn't pick up the block.  And here is the coaching moment.  Do you bench Koger?  The guy has been in the system for 3 years now.  When do you stop working with a kid, the balance between teaching and winning.  I know Webb has been better this year, and if he was in on that play it likely wouldn't have happened.

The bigger question being though, is that RichRod's fault?  I have to say yes.  It is his responsibility to put the best players on the field with the best oppurtunity to succeed.  People can be angry at that statment all they want, it is the truth.

It is not enough to be close, good teams kill opponents for making mistakes, and it only takes one missed block to destroy you.  That's why I hope to see a really solid game out of this team.  I want to believe they are capable of doing that, but I am unfortunately starting to have my doubts.  It doesn't mean I hate the coaching staff, I actually quite like them, but they are not succeeding yet. 

UMaD

October 20th, 2010 at 5:33 PM ^

That Iowa still gained more yards per play than Michigan.  Even if some of the turnovers and penalties and field positions issues are eliminated, you end up with an even game.

As long as underclassmen dominate the 2-deep, we'll continue to see the sum of mistakes come out in the oppositions favor.  This team will need to outperform their opponents badly to make up for the big, game-changing mistakes inherent to inexperience/youth.

Bosch

October 20th, 2010 at 5:46 PM ^

turnovers and penalties but if Michigan corrected those mistakes the past couple of weeks, they would have played, as you note, an even game against what is looking to be 2 of the top 3 teams in the Big ten this year.

I see that as a pretty bright light at the end of this miserable tunnel.

UMaD

October 20th, 2010 at 6:07 PM ^

If by bright light you mean next year.  The costly mistakes (esp. turnovers) on offense will continue with a sophomore QB who should have redshirted last year and underclassmen at RB, LT, WR, and RG.  This offense is moving the ball. Once the mistakes are less frequent, we'll be in good shape. 

As for defense, it is where the offense was 2 years ago in terms of personnel. The problem is - that the path forward is less defined.  There is no equivalent to RR's vision on this side of the ball.  Yet, with most of the starters returning, we should expect improvement approaching competancy in 2011 (like the offense showed last year).

mejunglechop

October 20th, 2010 at 5:35 PM ^

Good article, but it would be interesting to see the impact of penalties from a win probability or expected points perspective. As it stands now the reasoning behind the individual impact analyses is pretty opaque.

Papochronopolis

October 20th, 2010 at 5:37 PM ^

I like the new content.  Good take on Matt Hinton's stuff.

As for this game, we kept up with a better team but the mistakes need to be corrected.  Let's hope we can move the ball well AND NOT TURN THE BALL OVER against PSU.

Gustavo Fring

October 20th, 2010 at 5:51 PM ^

But calling Tate "mostly good" is a bit unfair.  The guy made some really, really amazing passes, and I have been one of his most staunch critics.  In the pocket, when in rhythm, the guy can make any throw. 

They need to use both players

MileHighWolverine

October 20th, 2010 at 5:51 PM ^

and not harp on that last INT too much.  He had no choice but to chuck a long ball there and it was picked off as the Iowa D was ready for that type of play.

1st one was a killer, though

SirJack

October 21st, 2010 at 10:44 AM ^

I don't know how anyone could disagree that Tate was better than Denard in this game. Tate did more than "pretty good" and to dismiss him as a backup when he was on the field for three of our touchdowns is not fair.

Also, the fact that we got more yards than Iowa is to a large extent due (as pointed out above) to the fact that Iowa was able to play conservatively because of their three touchdown lead.

john22

October 20th, 2010 at 5:57 PM ^

killed iowa but turnovers and kicking the ball out bounds really hurt are chances of winning the game.Lets hope the bye-week helps us get focus again.Go Blue

qwatkins

October 20th, 2010 at 6:07 PM ^

On Iowa's 3rd and 14, where Adam Robinson converted it on a 16 yard run, Van Bergen was blatantly held from making a clear  tackle for a loss.  This missed call was likely a 7, and at least a 4, point swing. 

Jivas

October 20th, 2010 at 6:33 PM ^

At the moment the game was effectively decided? (I'd say this was when Iowa went up 3 TDs). I look at yards after this point - for both teams - with a jaundiced eye, as Iowa was in full conservative shut-down mode at that point. I'm interested in seeing the UFRs to get an idea as to what extent that played a role.

jmblue

October 20th, 2010 at 6:46 PM ^

The game was effectively decided when Iowa kicked the FG.  You can't choose a time before then.  Think about it: if they'd missed, we'd have had the ball at our 20 with 3 minutes to go and a one-possession game.  How could the game have been over? 

Incidentally, Iowa actually closed the yardage gap after this point, as we lost nine yards on our final possession while they gained around 10-15 after that.

erik_t

October 20th, 2010 at 7:29 PM ^

I'm not certain that "drive-extending" facemask was a bad idea. Who can honestly state that the tackle would have succeeded otherwise? It might have been a touchdown on that play instead of several plays later.

MGoShoe

October 20th, 2010 at 8:32 PM ^

...this is a very enlightening compendium of the team's mistakes against Iowa.  I think it actually shows how close this team is to being really good.

Marley Nowell

October 20th, 2010 at 9:46 PM ^

Seeing the penalties broken down this way shows how they were more impactful than they appear (8-66 doesn't seem like a significant amount when you put up 500+ yards of offense)

UMfan21

October 21st, 2010 at 12:01 AM ^

Certainly the kicks out of bounds were disappointing, but were they really "back breaking"?  With our "bend but dont' break" defense, isn't it likely they move the ball against us whether they start on the 20 or the 40?  So we are talking about the difference of maybe 2-3 plays which is about a minute off the clock tops...

I realize it's POSSIBLE we make them go 3 and out (we did it a time or two in the 4th quarter) but with time running down and GERG being forced to gamble more, it's probably equally likely they bust a big one on us. 

I guess I feel the kickoffs were very unfortunate, but the other penalties listed were more critical.

Paskanen

October 21st, 2010 at 12:19 AM ^

The impact of the Lewan "hit after the play" was understated. Michigan had a chance to go up 14-0 with a quality drive. Instead they go on to 21 unanswered points.

The worst part of that whole friggin call is that the hit was clearly before the whistle. It looked to me like the kid was simply making a downfield block.

uminks

October 21st, 2010 at 1:50 AM ^

The tougher the opposing defense the more prone our young spread offense is in making mistakes. Hopefully we will not see any more very good defenses until WI and OSU!  It will be interesting to see how the team responds after the bye weak on their road game to Happy Valley.  Even if we lose, I hope we play well but if we play well we should win!!!

Yard Dog

October 21st, 2010 at 10:26 AM ^

We all realized ball security was an issue from last year, and I chalked up the turnovers to youthful indiscretion due to playing so many freshmen.  I really thought the improvment over the first couple of weeks showed that we had this issue taken care of, and now it is again rearing it's ugly head.  I was frustrated with Tate last year because he tended to be very cavalier with the ball when under extreme pressure.  He still has that tendency this year to carry the ball loosely when scrambling.  Denard exhibits better ball security, but has been chucking up some poor passes when he should just throw it away and live for the next play.

The ball security issues are fixable.  Tate has shown some improvement, and as Denard will learn patience to just throw the ball away as he gains experience.

I also think the penalties will clean themselves up.  As I mentioned in a previous post, I'd rather have a overly aggressive Lewan rather than a passive Lewan.  He's just another young kid with immense talent that needs some maturation on the field. 

Johnpaldak

October 21st, 2010 at 1:01 PM ^

What is really something is we are ranked what 3rd in the nation on offensive and we have not even run the whole playbook yet some people have said that if you seen Rich's playbook it looks bigger than a Dictionary.  And what is amazing is we have not seen Rich's Quarterback option play yet with Denard and that's what really impresses me about this offensive.

bdneely4

October 21st, 2010 at 9:10 PM ^

that the Penn State game next week could be the most imporatnt game on the schedule for the rest of the season for RichRod and staff.  This week is our bye week, so there are a lot of things that the coaches can focus on and try to correct.  A lot of the things I have been reading on this blog is that the mistakes that the team has made the last 2 weeks are mostly correctable mistakes.  Well this week and next week are RichRod's time to hopefully correct a lot of them.  If they are not corrected, then we might as well assume the last two weeks is how our team will play out the rest of the season.

I know there have been a lot of importatnt games already this season, but IMO the Penn State game at this point is the most important.

GO BLUE!