Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (42)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 18 hours ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 2 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 3 days ago
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 1 week ago
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 week ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,381 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 553 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 384 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 158 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 2 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    34 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    2 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    30 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    37 replies
  • Michigan Women's Tennis Swept by UCLA
    1 replies
  • OT: Preakness Stakes
    25 replies
  • M Softball hosting Cal in Regional - 5/18
    21 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    112 replies
  • Marvin Robinson to FSU
    50 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    30 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    22 replies
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    8 replies
  • OT: RIP Dick Trickle and Ken Venturi
    14 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    61 replies
  • Softball Open Thread 7pm vs Valpo ESPN3
    35 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Marvin Robinson to FSU
    50 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    34 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    30 replies
  • OT: Preakness Stakes
    25 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    112 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    30 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    37 replies
  • M Softball hosting Cal in Regional - 5/18
    21 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    61 replies
  • Brady Hoke Calls Notre Dame A Chicken
    163 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    22 replies
  • OT: RIP Dick Trickle and Ken Venturi
    14 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    2 replies
  • Michigan Women's Tennis Swept by UCLA
    1 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings @ Ducks Game 7 Open Thread
    229 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Shane Morris to wear the famed #7 jersey, J.J. McGrath #46
    175 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • Brady Hoke Calls Notre Dame A Chicken
    163 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Saturday night drinking thread
    121 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    112 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • GoBlueWolverine's Dre Barthwell: Marvin Robinson to leave Michigan
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • This week in schadenfreude - Chicago Bulls
    84 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments

Let's Not And Say We Did

By Brian — March 24th, 2011 at 3:26 PM — 320 comments
Filed under:
  • brady hoke
  • brady hoke is the one true notriguez
  • column-type things
  • frank beckmann
  • pro-style fit
  • spread n shred

 denard-robinson-04jpg-6399aa0c7cd519fe_large bj-askew
Michigan's ground game stopped being effective in 1995.

I'm not sure if Jon Chait was reacting to the latest MANBALL quote from Brady Hoke or not, but when an article titled "You Can't Go Home Again" pops up the day after Michigan's new head coach says this:

"Once we get the power play down, then we'll go to the next phase. You know, because we're gonna run the power play."…

"We don't have a lot of fullbacks." Hopkins works out well at FB "for a lot of the old 49ers stuff" with split backs. Hoke wants fullbacks to block so hard they "come in at about 6-3, and leave the program at 6-1." …

It's hard to think otherwise. Of course, even ESPN folk have picked up on Hoke's love affair with the word "toughness"—the article could have been spurred by anything Hoke's said over the last three months. There are consistent reports that Hoke makes condescending comments about the spread at alumni events. Manball? Manball.

Some people love this. In my mind they all look like this…

image

yes, that's the Beckmann aficionado

…and could be coaching Purdue. I would not want to get in a conversation with any of these people because they would have very strong opinions about things they know nothing about. They would repeat inane aphorisms as if those were the final word on any subject, and they would regard any dispute as evidence of a diseased mind. I have talked to these people on the radio some. It's not fun. I close my eyes and imagine the exact dimensions and color of their mustaches. They are boringly consistent.

My hope is Hoke is a brilliant, innocent-as-snow delegator or a con man. He's got a quarterback who was an All-American as a true sophomore last year because of his legs. He's got an offensive coordinator whose track record suggests he prefers to air it out and that things get desperately bad when MANBALL advocates push him away from his mad bombing ways. He's got a set of running backs best described as underwhelming, a center who can teleport his way into tough reach blocks, and a guard who can block Manti Te'o twenty yards downfield. If the offseason could be spent fixing whatever it is that causes Robinson to turn the ball over willy-nilly, Michigan's offense would be insane. According to statistical things it already is.

Switching to an actual pro-style offense would be doing exactly what Michigan did last year when it installed the 3-3-5 despite the total unsuitability of its personnel for the scheme. It would be exactly as stupid. It can't be as bad statistically because instead of true freshman two star Ray Vinopal backed up by a duck, next to a walk on, and vaguely in front of more freshmen you have ten returning starters and Denard Robinson, but it would be just as dumb. If Hoke's bravado about being a bunch of tough bastards who love grinding out four yards on a power play is true I'm worried for the immediate and long term future of the program in the same way I was when hiring Greg Robinson caused me to dig out a picture of Tweek.

On the other hand, Beckmann aficionados love that stuff, and so do the newspapers that are no longer read by anyone other than Beckmann aficionados. English has developed lingo to distinguish words meant to be true from words meant to produce inoffensive newspaper blather: the latter is coachspeak. Rich Rodriguez was beyond awful at coachspeak. Hoke is a grand master. When IBM develops "Jim" and challenges Hoke to a duel, Watson-style, Hoke will destroy his opponent so badly smoke will come out of its nonexistent ears like that robot asked to rhyme something with "orange" in a story I read when I was eight. Hoke will lament Jim's lack of toughness.

This is a real skill the last three years have shown is way more important than you'd think. It's a relief when every press conference is Hoke being gently tickled on the belly and fed peeled grapes, and telling everyone you're establishing a mindset of toughness is fine. It's something that will help the program in the long run.

As long as you don't believe yourself. It won't help as much as winning a crapton of games, and even if the defense gets vastly better the best way to do that next year is to have an offense that puts up points, and the best way to do that is to very gently shift the offense towards your long term vision while still keeping Denard in the Heisman race.

This isn't 2008, when Michigan was screwed no matter what offense they put in. Getting Michigan's offense to go from explosive but inconsistent to world-destroying is a matter of getting a kicker, finding a good running back, working on Denard's reads and accuracy, and leaving everything else the hell alone. Michigan can't reasonably do that because they've got new coaches, but how hard is it to run a QB lead draw and follow that with QB Lead Oh Noes? The secret of Michigan's 2010 offense is that the zone read was hardly used. The other secret is it was a power running offense, one more effective than anything Michigan's run in at least the last decade and probably a lot longer.

Michigan YPC Career Leaders Since 1949 (min: 100 carries)

# Name Att Yds Yd/Att TD Lng From To
1t D. Robinson 325 2053 6.3 19 87 2009 2010
1t Jon Vaughn 226 1421 6.3 9 63 1989 1990
2 Kerry Smith 154 950 6.2 5 29 1980 1983
3 Tyrone Wheatley 688 4178 6.1 47 88 1991 1994
4 Tshimanga Biakabutuka 472 2810 6 24 60 1993 1995
5 Rob Lytle 557 3307 5.9 26 75 1973 1976
6 Allen Jefferson 175 1002 5.7 14 70 1987 1990

Michigan YPC, Team, Since 2001

# Year YPC
1 2010 5.58
2 2009 4.52
3 2006 4.27
4 2003 4.25
5 2007 3.97
6 2008 3.91
7 2005 3.89
8 2004 3.83
9 2002 3.82
10 2001 3.59

Borges should install his passing game immediately and Michigan should start running power schemes more frequently—power did feature occasionally last year—if they want to, but lining up under center to hand it off to Vincent Smith isn't going to be any better of an idea in 2011 than it was in 2010.

You can run a "pro-style" offense, but run it from the shotgun and run downhill using Denard Robinson as one of three primary tailbacks. You can't get rid of the scare quotes because he's Denard Robinson. If you do run a no-scare-quotes pro-style offense he's not Denard Robinson anymore. He's the guy handing off and you're walking back into the days where Michigan averaged less than four yards per carry and ran 65% of the time.

I think Borges knows this, but Hoke's coachspeak is going to make this the most terrifying spring game of all time.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 24th, 2011 at 6:12 PM | The offense was literally one (Score:1)
kylebennett7127
Joined: 08/18/2008
MGoPoints: 148

The offense was literally one big speedy mike hart away from being one if the best offenses ever. But I would like to be able to control the ball and clock and hopefully the game. But we were never really in any games with good teams. Most of that is the defense but I loved the old offenses too. I feel like they controlled games and that offense of rich rod would just get people out of position and get lucky

Hot girls we have problems too. We're just like you. Except we're hot.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:21 PM | Again (Score:1)
Hail-Storm
Hail-Storm's picture
Joined: 06/07/2010
MGoPoints: 2382

you are stuck on this control the clock thing.  There is NO correlation! you percieved this to be the case, but it is not a truth.  Michigan was a bad defense away from having a successful year.

When your argument is "I feel" your probably going to get beat up pretty good here. Especially when you say that you feel RR got lucky on offense. It is not luck. It is an offensive scheme that he pioneered and ran successfully at WV.  He is a great offensive mind, who was stuborn as a mule in forcing a defensive scheme on a DC that had no idea how to run it (as well as a freshman 5 starting on one side of the ball).

I think Brian is hoping all the coach speak is just that, and Hoke doesn't really overstep his bounds with Borges, like RR did with Gerg and Schafer. I am pretty certain (based on those damn liing stats at SDSU) that there really should be little concern.

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest." -Mark Twain


 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:07 PM | I am not arguing that offense (Score:1)
kylebennett7127
Joined: 08/18/2008
MGoPoints: 148

I am not arguing that offense wasn't great. We would have had an exceptional season if the defense was better. Like I said it was fun to watch. I just wished it could grind a little more. I'm glad rr is gone. And the offense would have been even better this year. Although the results would have been the same. One more year for those defensive players wouldn't help them line up correctly since gerg had no idea what he was doing....and I will admit if we had a kicker it would have been better

Hot girls we have problems too. We're just like you. Except we're hot.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:11 PM | Apparently you're too dumb to (Score:1)
cbuswolverine
Joined: 08/14/2008
MGoPoints: 1762

Apparently you're too dumb to figure out which post I was responding to.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:30 PM | There are way too many posts (Score:1)
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 1863

There are way too many posts here to try to enter this argument, but I can tell that you're a dick.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:08 PM | You mean like (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6230

when our offense had over 500 yards against an Iowa defense that allowed 317 per game? Hell, even though they only scored 7, the offense still gained 100 yards more than OSU typically gave up per game. But don't let silly things like numbers get in the way of anything that a bad defense made you believe.

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:19 PM | So you don't like (Score:1)
BlueHills
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 704

older M fans. Fine.

They're the only ones with a chance of remembering what a truly dominant Michigan team was, because they were around in 1947-8.

They're the ones who attended the '69 OSU game. Helluva game.

It's possible that they saw some good football and got spoiled by all that Manball.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:31 PM | It's also possible that (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

It's also possible that college football in 1969 != college football in 2011

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:34 PM | Um, the 1997 team would like (Score:1)
Blue In NC
Blue In NC's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 511

Um, the 1997 team would like to have a word with you.  

And the 2006 team is thinking of stopping over as well.  But guess what, that 2006 team with a dominant defense was beaten by a 2006 OSU team that featured (you guessed it) a mobile QB in a spreadish offense.  Times have changed and more importantly the rules have changed.  Strict manball teams can be good but very few are elite.  Those that are good have dominant RBs (something UM does not have for 2011).  I have to agree with Brian on this point.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:54 PM | Spreadish Offense (Score:1)
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1945

You mean a passing style spread offense?  OSU definitely didn't call on Troy Smith to run the ball much that year.  His rushing totals for each game were:

1 for -1 yds

7 for -13 yds

4 for 5 yds

3 for 18 yds

7 for 20 yds

7 for 54 yds

3 for 10 yds

4 for 38 yds

6 for 43 yds

11 for 37 yds

5 for 15 yds

4 for 12 yds (Michigan game)

62 rushing attempts in 12 games isn't very much, especially when you consider some of those were probably broken passing plays were he scrambled or occassionally was sacked.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:34 PM | 53 Points Against in 1947 (Score:1)
BlueHills
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 704

Maybe I don't know what Manball is. I know what defense is.

Anyway, I'm old and don't care.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:43 PM | Yeah, because nothing has (Score:1)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7575

Yeah, because nothing has changed in the game of college football since 1947.

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:16 PM | Bo ran the option (Score:1)
Maize and Blue ...
Maize and Blue 4 Life's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 3516

the complete opposite of manball.  Maybe you should learn terminology and understand it.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 9:57 PM | Settle down (Score:1)
bleedzblue
bleedzblue's picture
Joined: 09/03/2009
MGoPoints: 1146

Grandpa.

HAIL TO THE VICTORS VALIANT, HAIL TO THE CONQUERING HEROES!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:29 PM | "'Once we get the power play (Score:1)
MGoAero
MGoAero's picture
Joined: 03/16/2009
MGoPoints: 619

"'Once we get the power play down, then we'll go to the next phase. You know, because we're gonna run the power play.'…"

then,

"The other secret [of the 2010 offense] is it was a power running offense, one more effective than anything Michigan's run in at least the last decade and probably a lot longer."

Sooooo......  what exactly is Brian worried about? 

1) Hoke says he wants to run lots of power play

2) Brian frets

3) Brian says the 2010 offense was a power running offense

4) Brian frets some more

I beg to be set straight on Brian's worry regarding the running game.  Also, regarding consistency: "Getting Michigan's offense to go from explosive but inconsistent..."  I will note that inconsistency only really seemed to be a problem when the defense had a pulse.  Just my observation.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:49 PM | I think the thing that Brian (Score:1)
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 4884

I think the thing that Brian is worried about, is that our power running game from last year was run by a guy who runs a 4.3 and can find tiny cracks in the defense, ending the season with 1700 yards rushing and 6.3 yards on average.  The protypical power running in a pro-style offense switches that guy above with a RB who hasn't really shown they can do any of the above (as of yet at least).  If an RB emerges who can do the same, I don't think anyone, Brian included, will complain in the least bit.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:14 PM | Not to mention (Score:1)
Maize and Blue ...
Maize and Blue 4 Life's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 3516

for the end of the LC era and all of RR's time here we ran the zone blocking scheme that Hoke hates.  We haven't been to successful at lining up man on man and gaining yards.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:28 PM | "If an RB emerges who can do (Score:1)
cjpops
cjpops's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 1708

"If an RB emerges who can do the same, I don't think anyone, Brian included, will complain in the least bit."

 

Mike Cox will start at RB in the Fall.  (I knew I'd find a place to sneak this in this thread somewhere.

:-)

"If you shoot me, you're liable to lose a lot of those humanitarian awards."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:27 PM | Better than those who became fans of the spread (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38747

And losing, rather than Michigan Football.

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:33 PM | This whole "MANBALL" meme is (Score:1)
TimH
TimH's picture
Joined: 01/26/2010
MGoPoints: 296

This whole "MANBALL" meme is really becoming annoying.  I don't see how you can admit this is generic coachspeak but in the same breath divine from it the intracacies of the offense like a Babylonian reading a sheep's liver.  Just him saying "toughness" doesn't mean that we're going to run goal line sets from the 50 yard line for Pete's sake.  Honestly, I love coming here for the MGoBoard, but some of these main page posts are becoming a real chore.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:19 PM | Must be tough (Score:1)
Hail-Storm
Hail-Storm's picture
Joined: 06/07/2010
MGoPoints: 2382

to be forced to read someone's sports blog for free. I wish there was another option for you, like not reading it.

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest." -Mark Twain


 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:25 PM | Agreed.  "Manball" is (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27440

Agreed.  "Manball" is annoying.  And all the sheep are copying it because it's a phrase that Brian started using with some frequency.

Just like Tacopants, it was funny the first few times.  Tacopants is no longer funny, and "manball" has run its course, too.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 13

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:38 PM | I think that's the point.  I (Score:1)
Blue In NC
Blue In NC's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 511

I think that's the point.  I read Brian's comments as wanting to belive that Hoke will not revert to primarily power run football but being concerned about that based on Hoke's comments. I think that is reasonable to be concerned.

Personally, I hope and think those comments are made because right now the offense is focused on learning the things that the offense does not do well (the power run formations) rather than "our offense will be based on the power run."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:40 PM | Yuck yuck yuck! (Score:1)
.M.etaphysics
Joined: 09/24/2010
MGoPoints: 180

I have been reading this blog for nigh on 6 years and I simply cannot believe the downward spiral Brian has taken.  His writing was THE beacon for positivity and hope during the three long years of Rodriguez's tenure and it seems as if he cannot handle the hand we have been dealt as a program.

Rodriguez did some fantastic and inspiring things that could have kept improving, but failed significantly in a number of ways.  He lost his job, and we have a new coach.  What good could possibly come from fomenting angst, fear and self-perpetuating hostility in a man who very well may be our coach for a long time?  It seems as if Brian and many others have adopted the *EXACT SAME* determination to find potential fault and hand-wringing potential in Hoke that so many knuckle draggers did when Rodriguez the "outsider" was hired...

If we run a lot of plays from under-center at the spring game, gallons of ink will be spilt declaring the ruination of Denard's career and the inevitable transfer that awaits when he realizes how horrible and old-fashioned Hoke is.  We will hear again and again that Borges is fat and incapable of comprehending the time-bending genius of Rodriguez's offensive masterwyrx, that our slots will be rendered ineffective, and that we are doomed to nothing but a shell of Wisconsin's slovenly ancient bore-fest.  We will be treated to paranoid "worries" from fool after fool who simply cannot look to the obvious positives of this coaching change.

I choose to focus on the fact that SDSU had 2(!) 1000yd receivers and a 1400yd back last year.  I also rely on common sense enough to expect our new staff to be well aware of their prececessors' failure to minimize the transitional pains and also be wise enough to extract/assimilate any value that Rodriguez's quantum-mind left behind.

There is no fawking way that Hoke/Borges do not want to replicate the offensive successes this team has had in the past.  If anything, we will finally see a hybrid of Michigan football as it has been traditionally with the stat-producing philosophies of the modern spread game.

Fear is for fools and those burned by their support of Rodriguez.  I suppose I can understand Brian feeling punked after so many years of fighting the good fight, but we need to all realize as a fanbase that things are looking up for the program- despite what the fearful voice in the back of your head may tell you.

We will win ball games this year and hopefully the old Brian will come back to delight us all with rational optimism instead of parasitic spartybuck-level whinings.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:52 PM | (Score:1)
AAK15
AAK15's picture
Joined: 01/02/2011
MGoPoints: 188

I want to +10000000 you sir

UMich 13

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:52 PM | (Score:1)
AAK15
AAK15's picture
Joined: 01/02/2011
MGoPoints: 188

I want to +10000000 you sir

UMich 13

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:11 PM | great post (Score:1)
rcrichlo
Joined: 09/16/2010
MGoPoints: 36

I agree. Time for everyone to move on for RR. This coming for a diehard supporter. I went to the miss st bowl game hoping for a convincing win tha twould give RR another year. I sat through the whole game and took it ALL in.

By the time I got back to my hotel I had excepted the fact that changes was needed. RR was dealt a crappy hand but it was time to mix it up. The defense had no clue and the offense often stalled when it was needed the most (to extend a 7pt lead or come back from7-10pts down).

 

enough RR whining. lets move on.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:34 PM | Concern about Borges/Hoke (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

Concern about Borges/Hoke offense != RR whining. Conflating the two does not a reasonable argument make.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:42 PM | Except they're kinda like Temptation (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38747

And the Hawaiian War Chant....

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:58 PM | +1 for cleverness, -1 for (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

+1 for cleverness, -1 for suggesting that any criticism of Hoke is automatically nostalgia for RR. Nowhere in the OP do I see any implication that RR should not have been fired.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:20 PM | sycophantic homerism (Score:1)
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 5144

was never really Brian's thing, IIRC. I mean, aren't there all kinds of wood-panelled homosocialist venues where the duffers can sit around and shout hurhur in unison, win or lose? That sounds like what went down in Barton Hills the other night--immature boyishness of a kind I'd prefer not to associate with my school.  

This thing is that Brian was excited about the possibilities in RR's spread offense, and people MISTOOK it for homerism, when he was not really of (some of) their superannuated culture, just their alma mater. 

It does raise the question whether he should keep at this, though. I'd find it tiring. But--hey--even if Hoke does manage to be more loyal to Tressel than RichRod, it does sound like he plans to have kids graduate; that's something.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:33 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:1)
Markymark
Joined: 10/02/2010
MGoPoints: 25

This.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:11 PM | Man I'm like totally (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6230

surprised that someone would be skeptical of a coach who went 47-50 at mid-major schools. Normally, coaches with that resume would be FIRST on my list.

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:48 PM | If you looked at the last 5 years (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38747

Does that mean you'd hire Hoke over Rich?

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:49 PM | What I'm saying is (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6230

that I would probably have wanted someone better than Hoke to replace RR.

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 9:24 PM | Thank you for contributing a (Score:1)
Magnum P.I.
Magnum P.I.'s picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2745

Thank you for contributing a petty, worthless response to a very well articulated argument.

"There was a time I could have been mistaken for Burt Reynolds. I had a moustache and so did he. But he was the number one star in the world, so there wasn't really much confusion."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:43 PM | Sigh (Score:1)
S.G. Rice
S.G. Rice's picture
Joined: 07/18/2008
MGoPoints: 512

The only thing this post was missing was a few cracks at how much Hoke hates zone blocking.

I guess I fall in with the less-than-impressed-with-the-09-offense crowd.  Other than Denard, that is.  I'm willing to give Coach Borges the benefit of the doubt, that he'll come up with a way to use the returning talent in a way that wins football games.

redefining epic fail, one comment at a time

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:07 PM | serious motha-fletchin FAIL equals (Score:1)
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 5144

real possibility from where I sit. Trashing the spread, meanwhile, equals not bright when you are likely to be shredded by two or three of them in the coming year.

And the fact that Brandon may be participating in these trashfests??? They better hope they get this right because that would not only equal egg on your face but becoming a g.d. egg salad sandwich and being consumed for lunch by history. 

Manball, my ass. In a game PREDICATED on toughness, going around talking about the size of your pen*s only leaves its size more suspect. I can really see some OSU players yucking over that after beat-down number 47. Crikey.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:51 PM | (Score:1)
AAK15
AAK15's picture
Joined: 01/02/2011
MGoPoints: 188

just curious but how many years of football did you play Brian?

UMich 13

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:58 PM | emotional (Score:1)
Jasper
Jasper's picture
Joined: 12/30/2010
MGoPoints: 995

Eh, I'll bite.

AAK15, how many years of football would be required (in your world) to make comments on Michigan's program?  You sound like an 8th-grader.

"500 channels and nothing but cats."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:37 PM | To be fair, that was low hanging fruit, but there is (Score:1)
Wolv54
Wolv54's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 98

some validity to his question.  To excuse that validity is just as narrow-minded.  Not having played or coached football at all or very little would lead some to believe that Brian's opinions are based on second hand knowledge or theory.  Theoretical knowledge clings to it's charts, graphs, and other statistical information while practical or applied knowledge leans on it's experience.  Since no one has seen this offense in action and how it will feature Denard, then Brian's opinions are speculative.  It is not ridiculous to question the extent of the Author's practical knowledge, IMO.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:39 PM | Mr Brandon? (Score:1)
htownwolverine
htownwolverine's picture
Joined: 09/02/2009
MGoPoints: 3361

Is that you?

Who is Jon Falk?
  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:12 PM | Matt Millen played 12 years (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6230

in the NFL....so your point is what?

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:52 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:1)
mackbru
mackbru's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3066

Last year, at SDSU, the so-called Manball offense was pretty electric. By the end of the season, it was better than Michigan's offense, and certainly more diverse and unpredictable. I think you're falling back into the "If only RR had one more this or that." Which is always easy to say.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:05 PM | Totally Agree (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11209

I have now watched 4 SDSU games - all pretty damn exciting on offense.  I think that we need to get past the "if RR had one more year" attitude. 

I also can't stand the whole "Hoke better win 10 games this year" otherwise firing RR was a mistake.  What did we see from RR that led us to believe that he would win 10 games?  Most of his wins were decided by 1 score (some by 1 play). 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:28 PM | Year to year improvement. 10 (Score:1)
GBOD79
GBOD79's picture
Joined: 07/14/2009
MGoPoints: 3005

Year to year improvement. 10 returning starters on Offense. Playing Non-Freshman on Defense, etc. I think those are all indicators that 9-10 wins was the barometer next season. Nothing should change for Hoke. In fact, if Hoke is a better coach than RR, which people are saying, the expected win count should be higher.

Those who stay will be champions!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:57 PM | Wow, I bet you were also (Score:1)
raiderblue
Joined: 01/23/2011
MGoPoints: 570

Wow, I bet you were also predicting 9-10 wins in '09, and when that didn't happen 2010 was going to be the year since we were returning so many players. That didn't pan out either, so 2011 would have been it. It was always next year for the RR fan club. 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:10 PM | Seriously (Score:1)
Maize and Blue ...
Maize and Blue 4 Life's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 3516

SDSU played against 6 of the 20 worst defenses in the country not including their 4-7 FCS opponent while Michigan played against 7 of the top 30.  STFU.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:17 PM | You make (Score:1)
Kermits Blue Key
Joined: 09/04/2010
MGoPoints: 439

You make a very valid point and I tend to agree with you.  However, I don't feel his point was so controversial as to warrant a "STFU".

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:37 PM | Its not like SDSU had very (Score:1)
Seattle Maize
Seattle Maize's picture
Joined: 03/24/2011
MGoPoints: 267

Its not like SDSU had very much talent though and the fact that they improved as the season went on shows that the coaches did a good job developing players.  Something that has not happened at Michigan the last few years under either RR or LC

  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.